Perspectives Successfulsanitationpromotionmustrecognizetheuseof latrinewastesinagriculture—theexampleofVietNam PeterKjærJensen,1PhamDucPhuc,2AndersDalsgaard,3&FlemmingKonradsen1 Introduction ToachievetheaimsoftheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals, significantinvestmentswillberequiredtoincreasesanitation coverageandimprovethemanagementofhumanexcreta.The UnitedNationsMillenniumTaskForceonWaterandSanitationputforward10crucialactionsthatwouldbeneeded,and amongtheseisapledgeforgovernmentstosupportsanitation solutions that are technically, socially, environmentally and financiallyappropriate(1) IneasternAsiaoneofthekeyaspectstobeconsidered whenpromotingappropriatesanitationsolutionsanddesigninghealtheducationprogrammesistheuseofhumanexcreta asanagriculturalfertilizer.Thecenturiesoldtraditionofusing humanexcretaonfarmlandhasbeenabandonedinEurope, butisstillwidespreadineastAsia,especiallyinChinaandViet Nam.Althoughtheremaybenegativehealthconsequences oftheuseofexcretaasfertilizer,itisarguedhere,inreference tothecurrentsituationinVietNam,thatifthisisacommon practice among farmers, then sanitation programmes andhygienecampaignsmustacknowledgeitsexistenceand designsystemsthatallowforexcretatobeusedinthesafest waypossible Excretareuseandhealth Fromanagriculturalpointofviewtheuseofhumanexcretais asoundpracticeforseveralreasons • Itprovidescheapfertilizerforcropsandthusreducesimportsofcommercialfertilizer • Itisagoodsoilconditioner • Itisanintegralpartofnutrientrecyclingindifferenttypes ofintegratedfarmingsystems However,dependingonthestandardofhygieneduringthe handling and composting of the faecal material, the use of excretacanhaveseverenegativehealthconsequences.These mayaffectfarmworkerswhoaredirectlyexposedtotheexcreta; childrenplayinginornearfields;andconsumersoffertilized produce.Inaddition,pathogensmaybetransmittedto,and spreadby,wildanddomesticanimals,havingwidergeographical healthandhygieneimplications Morethan75%ofthefarmersstudiedintheNgheAn provinceincentralVietNamwerereportedtousefreshor partlycompostedhumanexcretatofertilizetheirfarmlands orgardens(2).Thiscontinuoususeofexcretainagriculture islikelytocontributetotheveryhighrateofinfectionwith intestinal parasites in Viet Nam. For example, it has been estimatedthat22millionVietnamese,ornearly29%ofthe entirepopulation,havehookworminfection.Insomefarming communitiesinnorthandcentralVietNamreportedratesof hookworminfectionwere70%ormoreoftheentirepopulation(3,4).Furthermore,itislikelythatthetransmissionof otherimportantpathogenssuchasTrichurisspp.,Ascarisspp. andTaeniaspp.isfavouredbythecontinueduseofexcreta. SimilarproblemsareencounteredinChinawhereitisestimatedthatmorethan530millionpeopleareinfectedwith Ascarisspp.(5) TheauthoritiesinVietNamhaverecentlyrevisedthe regulationsonsanitationandhygienepromotion,includingthe practicesforthehandlingoflatrinewastes,withanemphasison adheringtoaminimumdurationofcompostingofexcretabeforeitisusedasanagriculturalfertilizer.Thisrevisionispartly aresponsetothecontinuedwidespreaduseofhumanexcreta inagriculture.Itisclearthatexcretamanagementsystemswill havetobeputinplacetotacklethesignificantpublichealth problemsassociatedwithunhygienicmanagementofexcreta intheregion.Thequestionis,whatsystemswillwork? Implementationproblems Evaluations from east Asia have shown that sanitation programmesoftenpromotelatrinesthatdonotaccommodatethe practiceoffarminghouseholdscollectingandusingexcretain agriculture(6,7).Thetypesoflatrinethathavebeenpromoted includethepourflushandseptictankswhicharesuperiorfrom ahygienicpointofviewtothetraditionalVietnamesedouble vaultcompostinglatrine.However,itisimportanttobearin mindthatthefarmersseeexcretaasavaluablefertilizerand, therefore,favourlatrineswheretheycanstoreexcretaandhave accesswhenneededforuseinagriculturalproduction(2,7). Thereareinstancesoffarmersforcingopenthesealoflatrines and/orseptictanksandbreakingthelatrines,togainaccess totheexcreta.InasanitationprojectinXomHaprovincein VietNam,30%ofthelatrineshadbeendestroyedwithintwo yearsbecausethefarmerscouldnotgainaccessstotheexcreta (7).Thus,itisclearthatforsanitationandhygienepromotion programmestobesuccessful,legislationmustacknowledgethe practiceofusingexcretaasfertilizer UniversityofCopenhagen,InstituteofPublicHealth,DepartmentofInternationalHealth,ØsterFarimagsgade5,Building16,EntranceI,POBox2099,1014 CopenhagenK,Denmark.CorrespondenceshouldbesenttoDrJensenatthisaddress(email:p.k.jensen@pubhealth.ku.dk) NationalInstituteofHygieneandEpidemiology,DivisionofEntericInfections,Hanoi,VietNam DepartmentofVeterinaryPathobiology,RoyalAgricultureandVeterinaryUniversity,Frederiksberg,Denmark Ref.No.05-025130 BulletinoftheWorldHealthOrganization|November2005,83(11) 873 Perspectives Latrinesandagriculture Legislationonexcretaanditsusein agriculture TheauthoritiesinVietNamdoallowtheuseofcomposted hygienic safe human excreta as a fertilizer in horticulture. However,untilveryrecentlythedefinitionof“hygienicsafe humanexcreta”wasbasedoncompostingtimeonly,andthe twomainresponsibleministries,theMinistryofHealthand theMinistryofAgricultureandRuralDevelopment,applied differentstandardsfortheminimumrequiredcomposting time(threeandsixmonths,respectively).Thislackofcommon standards hindered the promotion of safe practices. However,followingrecentrevisionstotheguidelinesboth ministriesnowrecommendacompostingtimeofsixmonths fortheproductionofhygienicsafeexcretathatcanbeused asfertilizer(8).Thisdurationofcompostingforhumanexcretatobeusedascropfertilizersislikelytoprotecthuman health,especiallyifthefarmerscontinuewiththecommon practiceofaddingkitchenashandlime(calciumoxide)to the latrines, a practice that has been found to reduce the composting time needed to obtain hygienic compost (9). EvenforAscariseggsadie-offof97%canbeexpectedafter 6–8 months of composting without increasing pH (10). However,oneprobleminensuringasufficientcomposting timerelatestotheagriculturalcalendar,astheclimaticbelt ofnorthandcentralVietNamaccommodatesthreecropsper year.Phuc(2)foundthatfarmersapplyinghumanexcreta paidmoreattentiontothefertilizerneedsoftheplantsthan tothepotentialhygienicproblems.Therefore,itislikelythat farmers would remove the excreta from the latrines every fourthmonthduringlandpreparation,regardlessofregulationsonthelengthofcomposting Futureresearchandimplementationneeds Whenconsideringpreviousexperienceswithsanitationinthe eastAsianregion,itseemsrelevantthatthenewguidelinesand promotionalactivitiesaddresstheprioritiesoffarmersandthat appliedresearchshouldfocusoncombiningthesanitationand healthobjectiveswiththeneedsofthefarmersforagricultural inputs.Importantissuestobeaddressedintheplanningand implementationprocessarediscussedbelow PeterKjærJensenetal. Focusonthefarmers’needs In areas where use of human excreta in agriculture is common,farminghouseholdswouldprobablyacceptsanitation technologiesandhygienepromotionalactivitiesiftheycould beaccommodatedwithintheagriculturalproductionsystem and be seen as offering an economic advantage.The focus shouldbeonthedevelopmentofsanitationsystemsthatallow fortheuseofexcretaasfertilizerratherthanonlyontheneed forimprovementsinhygiene Processdevelopment Onewayforwardmaybetofocusonmakingthecomposting processmoreefficientandshorteningthecompostingtime. Insteadoffocusingonaminimumsafecompostingtime,the advantageofaddingasufficientquantityoflimetotheexcreta toacceleratethecompostingprocesssothatittakeslessthan four months would be a better option. Another possibility wouldbetoaddcarbon-richmaterialtothelatrinewaste,such asricehuskorstrawmaterials,whichmayincreasethetemperatureinthepit Interdisciplinarydecision-making TheVietnameseexampleshowsthatlegislationshouldbebased onmultidisciplinaryknow-how.Inthecaseofpromotionof sanitation and hygiene, a single ministry will not have the specificexpertiseorawarenessrequiredtodesignsustainable programmes.Therefore,theemphasisshouldbeonforming aninterdisciplinarytaskforcethatwouldsupportandaccommodatethedifferentprioritiesofthehealth,agricultureand sanitationministries Adaptationoftechnology Cautionisnecessarywhenpromotingaparticulartechnology, suchastheeco-sanitarylatrines,alsoreferredtoascomposting latrines,becausetheymaynotbesustainableandhygienically soundifthetechnologyisnotinaccordancewiththelivelihoodsandprioritiesofthelocalcommunities.Thetechnology needs to be adapted through community involvement and people must see both the economic and health benefits of usingthetechnology.O Competinginterests:nonedeclared References 1. BartramJ,LewisK,LentonR,WrightA.Focusingonimprovedwaterand sanitationforhealth.Lancet2005Feb26-Mar4;365(9461):810-12 2. PhucDP.Studyofpeople’sperceptionandhandlingpracticesoftheuseof latrinewastesasfertilizersinagricultureinPhucSoncommune,NgheAn province,VietNam[MscThesis].Copenhagen:InstituteofPublicHealth, DepartmentofInternationalHealth,UniversityofCopenhagen;2003 3. vanderHoekW,DeNV,KonradsenF,CamPD,HoaNT,ToanNDetal. Currentstatusofsoil-transmittedhelminthsinVietnam.SoutheastAsianJ TropMedPublicHealth2003;34Suppl1:1-11 4. VerleP,KongsA,DeNV,ThieuNQ,DepraetereK,KimHTetal.Prevalenceof intestinalparasiticinfectionsinnorthernVietnam.TropMedIntHealth2003 Oct;8(10):961-4 5. PengW,ZhouX,CuiX.Comparisonsofthestructuresofnaturaland re-establishedpopulationsofAscarisinhumansinaruralcommunityof Jiangxi,China.Parasitology2002;124(Pt6):641-7 874 6. GovernmentofVietnam.NationalRuralWaterSupply&SanitationStrategy StudyNRWSS,Midtermreport,Socialandhygienicsituation.Hanoi: GovernmentofVietnam;1997;3. 7. WaterandSanitationProgramme.SellingsanitationinVietnam,whatworks? Jakarta:WaterandSanitationProgramme,EastAsiaandthePacific;2002 8. MinistryofHealth.Regardingissuingthesectorstandards.Hygienestandards forvarioustypesoflatrines.Hanoi:MinistryofHealth;2005.(Decisionof theMinisterofHealthNo.08/2005/Q§-BYT.) 9. SchưnningC,StenstrưmT.Guidelinesforthesafeuseofurineandfaeces inecologicalsanitationsystems.StockholmEnvironmentalInstitute: Stockholm;2004 10.FeachemRG,BradleyDJ,DarelickH,MaraDD.Sanitationanddisease–health aspectsofexcretaandwastewatermanagement.NewYork:JohnWiley& SonsfortheWorldBank;1983 BulletinoftheWorldHealthOrganization|November2005,83(11) ... processmoreefficientandshortening? ?the? ??compostingtime. Instead? ?of? ??focusingonaminimumsafecompostingtime,? ?the? ?? advantage? ?of? ??addingasufficientquantity? ?of? ??limeto? ?the? ??excreta toaccelerate? ?the? ??compostingprocesssothatittakeslessthan... Interdisciplinarydecision-making The? ??Vietnamese? ?example? ??showsthatlegislationshouldbebased onmultidisciplinaryknow-how.? ?In? ? ?the? ??case? ?of? ? ?promotion? ? ?of? ?? sanitation? ?? and hygiene, a single ministry will... suchas? ?the? ??eco-sanitarylatrines,alsoreferredtoascomposting latrines,becausetheymaynotbesustainableandhygienically soundif? ?the? ??technologyisnot? ?in? ??accordancewith? ?the? ??livelihoodsandpriorities? ?of? ? ?the? ??localcommunities.? ?The? ??technology