Tài liệu Báo cáo khoa học: Medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR) Family characterizations including genome comparisons and active site modelling pdf

Medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR) Family characterizations including genome comparisons and active site modelling Erik Nordling 1,2 , Hans Jo¨ rnvall 1 and Bengt Persson 1,2 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics and 2 Stockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Completed eukaryotic genomes were screened for medium- chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR). In the human genome, 23 MDR forms were found, a number that prob- ably will increase, because the genome is not yet fully inter- preted. Partial sequences already indicate that at least three further members exist. Within the MDR superfamily, at least eight families were distinguished. Three families are formed by dimeric alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH; originally detec- ted in animals/plants), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenases (originally detected in plants) and tetrameric alcohol dehy- drogenases (originally detected in yeast). Three further families are centred around forms initially detected as mitochondrial respiratory function proteins, acetyl-CoA reductases of fatty acid synthases, and leukotriene B4 dehydrogenases. The two remaining families with polyol dehydrogenases (originally detected as sorbitol dehydro- genase) and quinone reductases (originally detected as f-crystallin) are also distinct but with variable sequences. The most abundant families in the human genome are the dimeric ADH forms and the quinone oxidoreductases. The eukary- otic patterns are different from those of Escherichia coli. The different families were further evaluated by molecular modelling of their active sites as to geometry, hydrophobicity and volume of substrate-binding pockets. Finally, sequence patterns were derived that are diagnostic for the different families and can be used in genome annotations. Keywords: medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases; genome comparisons; polyol dehydrogenase; cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; quinone oxidoreductase. Medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDRs) consti- tute a large enzyme superfamily with (including species variants) close to 1000 members [1,2]. The MDR enzymes represent many different enzyme activities of which alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) are the most closely investigated. They participate in the oxidation of alcohols, detoxification of aldehydes/alcohols and the metabolism of bile acids [3,4]. Another MDR branch has polyol dehydrogenase (PDH) activities originally detected for sorbitol dehydro- genase (SDH) [5]. All the corresponding substrates are widespread in nature because of their derivation from glucose, fructose, and general metabolism. In some organ- isms these substrates, such as polyols, can be accumulated at high concentrations constituting a protection against environmental stress, such as osmotic shock [6], and reduced or elevated temperature [7,8]. Polyol accumulation can, however, be harmful [9], suggesting a further protective role for these enzymes. An MDR family earlier recognized is cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, CAD. This enzyme type in plants catalyses the last step in the biosynthesis of the monomeric precursors of lignin, the main constituent of plant cell walls [10]. This enzyme family has been exten- sively characterized through CAD from plant sources [11–13], because of its importance for the pulp industry [14]. Down-regulation or inhibition of CAD will reduce wood lignin content and yield a pulp of high quality [15]. A further MDR family long since recognized is the quinone oxidoreductase (QOR)-type, of which one mammalian form functions as a lens protein (f-crystallin) [16], muta- tional loss of which may result in cataract formation at birth. This suggests that f-crystallin has a role in the protection of the lens against oxidative damage [17]. In common therefore, as demonstrated by the examples above, all MDR families appear to have some members with protective functions in different organismal defences [2]. All MDR enzymes utilize NAD(H) or NADP(H) as cofactor and several but not all of the members have one zinc ion with catalytic function at the active site. Some, in particular classical, dimeric ADHs, also have a second zinc ion at a structural site, stabilizing an external loop present in those forms [18]. The availability of completed genomes provides an opportunity to evaluate all these members of the MDR superfamily. We have therefore studied the MDR enzymes corresponding to the products from available eukaryotic genomes (and for comparison, the Escherichia coli genome is also included, but not further analysed because of the distant relationships). The total number of MDR forms in each species was evaluated, orthologies were assigned and evolutionary relationships were characterized. In addition, separate sequence motifs were defined and the active site variability was investigated. Correspondence to B. Persson, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Fax: + 46 8 337 462, Tel.: + 46 8 728 7730, E-mail: bengt.persson@mbb.ki.se Abbreviations:MDR,medium-chaindehydrogenases/reductases; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogen- ase; YADH, yeast alcohol dehydrogenase; MRF, mitochondrial response proteins; PDH, polyol dehydrogenases; QOR, quinone oxidoreductases; ACR, acyl-CoA reductase; LTD, leukotriene B 4 dehydrogenase. (Received 12 April 2002, revised 24 June 2002, accepted 15 July 2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 4267–4276 (2002) Ó FEBS 2002 doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03114.x MATERIALS AND METHODS Protein sequences translated from the complete genomes of Homo sapiens [19,20], Drosophila melanogaster [21], Caenorhabditis elegans [22], Arabidopsis thaliana [23], Saccharomyces cerevisiae [24] and Escherichia coli [25] were searched for MDR members using FASTA [26] with known MDR proteins [1,2] as query sequences. Hits with an expect value (E value) below 10 )10 were extracted and screened for MDR sequence patterns in order to find true members. These sequences were subsequently subjected to another round of FASTA searches against the protein sequences from each genome to find further homologues. Multiple sequence alignments were calculated using CLUSTALW [27]. Evolu- tionary trees were calculated from the alignments using the distance-based techniques, neighbour joining and UPGMA , and a heuristic search to find the most parsimonious tree. The neighbour joining tree was created using CLUSTALW and the other trees were created using PAUP [28]. The certainty of each branch point was assessed with bootstrap tests of the different trees. When all three methods agreed on a branch point with a bootstrap value above 90%, the corresponding branch was considered significant, and is marked with an asterisk in Fig. 1. Each protein that was not assigned an unambiguous placement during the bootstrap tests was manually investigated for the appearance of family specific sequence patterns to aid in the classification process. The resulting evolutionary trees were displayed with TREEVIEW [29]. All sequences were checked vs. the SWISSPROT database [30] for functional annotations. The active sites of the MDR proteins were investigated by homology modelling using ICM (Molsoft LLC, La Jolla, CA, USA) [31]. For the CAD and PDH families, the ketose reductase from Bemisia argentifolii (PDB accession no. 1e3j) [32] is the closest homologue with known three-dimensional structure. For the families of QOR, mitochondrial response factor proteins, leukotriene B4 dehydrogenases (LTDs) and acyl-CoA reductases (ACRs), the three-dimensional struc- ture of E. coli quinone oxidoreductase (PDB accession no. 1qor) [33] was used as template. Active site residues were assigned according to the crystal structure of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase with bound substrate (PDB acces- sion no. 3bto) [34]. For the homology modelling, the active site residues were replaced according to the multiple sequence alignment of each MDR family (cf. Fig. 1). The replaced residues were positioned initially in the same rotamers as the original residues. Each replacement was followed by a conjugate gradient minimization of 100 function evaluations [35]. The last step in the replacement procedure is a conjugate gradient minimization of 1000 functional evaluations to relieve any remaining unfavour- able side chain interactions. The volume of the active site is measured as the space accessible for a carbon probe in the interior of the protein. The hydrophobicity index was calculated by averaging the hydrophobicity values [36] of the active site residues. Fig. 1. Evolutionary tree of the MDR enzymes from the six genomes investigated. Confidence levels of over 90% from the bootstrap test are marked with an asterisk at the corresponding branch point. The tree branches early, which indicates a divergent superfamily of ancient origin where a limited number of ancestral genes have diverged during the evolution of the separate species. The eight families are enclosed by thick lines. 4268 E. Nordling et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION MDR forms in the completed genomes We find 23 MDR forms (Table 1) upon screening the human genome. In addition, we find three incomplete sequences, still too early to finally evaluate, and therefore not included in this study. Thus, the total number of human MDR forms can be expected to increase slightly. The A. thaliana genome is the one with the greatest number of MDR members (38), which is consistent with a high gene duplication tendency in this organism [23]. Surprisingly, the genome of S. cerevisiae (like that of E. coli)alsohasmany MDR members, especially in relation to its size vs. that of the larger genomes of C. elegans and D. melanogaster,with only 13 and 10 members, respectively (Table 1). Obviously, the MDR super-family exhibits different levels of variability and represents a number of different ancestral gene duplications followed by repeated acquirements of new functions, ÔenzymogenesisÕ [37]. From the consensus evolutionary tree (Fig. 1), construc- ted from the aligned MDR sequences of six genomes (human, D. melanogaster, C. elegans, A. thaliana, S. cere- visiae and E. coli), we can first divide the MDR super- family into families. Four families are clearly separated from the rest of the tree. These are the dimeric ADHs, CAD, yeast alcohol dehydrogenases (YADH) and mito- chondrial response proteins (MRF). Notably, CAD is not only found in plants, but also in the S. cerevisiae genome (as in the E. coli genome), indicating that CAD has a wider function than just lignin biosynthesis, which is consistent with the annotation in SWISSPROT recently changed to mannitol dehydrogenase. Two families contain sequences that are distantly related. These are the PDHs and QORs. Finally, there are the two families of ACRs and LTDs, and a few forms that do not belong to any of the families mentioned. Half of the families are zinc-containing MDRs and half are non-zinc-containing MDRs. A division can be drawn (dashed line in Fig. 1), with the zinc-containing MDRs in one of the halves (bottom Fig. 1, with families CAD, PDH, ADH, YADH) and the non-zinc-containing MDRs in the other (top Fig. 1 with families QOR, MRF, LTD, ACR). The number of enzymes in each genome belonging to the different families is listed in Table 1. ADH is the family branch most frequently found in the human genome, while ADH and CAD are the most frequent in the A. thaliana genome. The YADH-type of enzyme is present not only in yeast but also in C. elegans, A. thaliana (and E. coli). These latter organisms therefore have alcohol dehydrogenases of both the dimeric and tetrameric ADH families. In Table 1, the few forms that do not fit into the eight families are grouped in the column ÔOthersÕ. Comparing our results with those of other databases, e.g. PFAM [38] and COG [39], we find that several family members are also represented in the corresponding entries of those databases, supporting our results. However, in contrast to our work, PFAM does not subclassify the MDR superfamily. Inthe COG database, the human and A. thaliana sequences are presently lacking. Furthermore, COG groups the YADH and CAD families together in COG 1064, and the MRF and QOR families together in COG 0604. COG and PFAM also include six yeast proteins distantly related to MDR forms but with expect values far below our threshold of 10 )10 , while we include some members with better expect values which are more closely related to the MDR family but not listed in the other classifications. Two of the distantly related yeast proteins were included in a previous, different genome comparison [2], giving 17 S. cereivisae MDR forms instead of the present 15. However, for E. coli, the number of MDR forms (17) is unchanged. Of the MDR families now observed, the dimeric and tetrameric ADH families have been recently analysed elsewhere [40] while six families are further considered below: PDH, CAD, QOR, MRF, LTD and ACR. Family distinguishing sequence patterns are also recognized. The polyol dehydrogenase (PDH) family The PDH family contains SDH, ketose reductase and threonine dehydrogenase. SDH is present in all genomes of this study, and a corresponding gene with retained function is traceable from prokaryotes to man. This conservation emphasizes that this SDH has an important function common through a wide range of life forms. It further shows species-specific duplications, in a manner well known also in the classical ADH family [41]. The separate SDH duplications appear to have occurred independently in several lines as reflectedbythe human, C. elegans,D. melano- gaster and S. cerevisiae genomes. These isoforms show 81.2–99.7% residue identity in pairwise comparisons. In addition, S. cerevisiae has one further SDH form that is only 53% identical to the others, indicating the presence of widely separated duplications in the SDH group. TheactivesitevolumesofthePDHsrangebetween77 and 257 A ˚ 3 . SDH typically has large volumes of between Table 1. Number of sequences within each MDR family, discernible from the genomes investigated. The six enzymes that do not fit into the eight families are grouped in the column ÔOthersÕ. Genome ADH CAD YADH PDH QOR MRF LTD ACR Others Sum H. sapiens (38922 ORFs) 9 – – 2 7 1 2 1 1 23 C. elegans (19000 ORFs) 2 – 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 13 D. melanogaster (13500 ORFs) 1 – – 3 1 1 – 3 1 10 A. thaliana (25464 ORFs) 9 8 1 1 7 1 11 – – 38 S. cerevisiae (6000 ORFs) 1 2 4 5 1 1 1 – – 15 E. coli (4289 ORFs) 1 2 1 9 1 – 1 – 2 17 Total 23 12 8 22 18 6 16 5 6 116 Ó FEBS 2002 MDR family characterizations in complete genomes (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 4269 210 and 257 A ˚ 3 . Most of the active site residues are conserved through all PDH forms. Within the SDHs (entries 4–14 of Table 2), 10 out of 16 amino acid residues are strictly conserved, and remaining residues are exchanged only to a conservative extent in most cases. A few further enzymes in Table 2 are annotated as SDH, but their E values are much lower than those for the verified SDHs. In addition, the residues, hydrophobicity and geometry at the active sites are different from those of the confirmed SDHs, indicating that they are likely to represent further types of polyol activities. The zinc-liganding residues, Cys45, His70 and Glu156 (residue numbers according to human SDH) [42], are conservedinmostPDHforms.InsixPDHs,Glu156is exchanged for Asp, Gln or Ser. The Asp might act as a zinc ligand [43], but the Gln or Ser are not likely to contribute zinc ligands [43]. The exact nature of one ligand has been much investigated previously [44]. In DM_7300579, two of the zinc ligands, Glu156 and Cys45, are missing and we postulate that this protein does not bind zinc. The coenzyme-binding motif in this protein deviates further, having two of the three Ôcoenzyme-typicalÕ Gly residues [45] replaced by Cys and Ala, respectively. This is expected to give a change in the fold within this region, and this protein may therefore exhibit loss of enzymatic activity, or represent another activity [37]. The cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) family This family contains CAD and mannitol dehydrogenases (MTD), represented in A. thaliana by eight forms. However, we also find two of this family’s forms in S. cerevisiae (and in E. coli). This family has 43 residues strictly conserved, of which close to half (19) are glycines, typical of unaltered folds [46]. In addition, seven cysteine residues are strictly conserved, of which six correspond to the zinc-liganding positions of ADH, suggesting the presence of two zinc ions in the CAD family. In plants, the ancestral gene for the CAD family has been duplicated after the separation from fungi, giving rise to the CAD and MTD lines. The substrate specifi- city, however, has been retained, as both these enzymes act on primary alcohols/aldehydes. CAD is part of the shikimic acid pathway, which leads to synthesis of nearly all plant aromatic compounds. This pathway is unique for plants, bacteria and fungi [47], consistent with the fact that no CAD homologue could be found in the other organisms. The hydrophobicity index is typically between )0.3 and +0.3 for most CAD/MTD forms (Table 2). The molecu- lar modelling of the enzymes within the CAD family indicates that some enzymes have a deep (> 12 A ˚ )and narrow ( 8A ˚ ) active site, while others have a more shallow ( 9A ˚ ) and somewhat wider ( 10 A ˚ ) active site (Table 2). Apart from the strictly conserved Cys48, His70, Glu71 and Cys164 (residue numbers according to CAD1_ ARATH), the conserved active site residues of the CAD family are one Glu and four hydrogen-bonding residues (typically Ser/Thr/Gln). Six A. thaliana CAD forms cluster together (59–98% residue identity), while two A. thaliana CAD enzymes (MLD14.17 and F28P22.13) form two separate lines. The quinone oxidoreductase (QOR) family The family containing QORs is variable but has distinct borders (Fig. 1). One enzymatic activity described for these members is QOR [48], but additional activities are likely to exist in the QOR family. In plants, QOR members give protection against diamide compounds, which may be metabolites of alkylating diazoate-derivatives [49]. Several proteins from the QOR family are found in the human genome only (Fig. 1), showing that this family has given rise to novel functions in mammals. These enzymes may therefore be highly important for mammalian meta- bolic conversions. As some of these enzymes are homolog- ous to the synaptic vesicle protein VAT-1 from Torpedo californica ray, the group might be involved in neuronal functions. This would be consistent with the increased number of QOR forms in mammals. The human VAT-1 homologue displays the largest active site volume (289 A ˚ 3 ) of the OQR subgroup. The VAT-1 related proteins have hydrophobic substrate pockets with hydrophobicity indices up to 1.47 (Table 2). At the active sites of the proteins of the QOR family, three residues are conserved in close to all forms: Asn41, Asp/Glu44 and Thr127. The QORs and human f-crystallin contain Tyr46 and Tyr52. The human QOR has ortho- logues in all species investigated except D. melanogaster (Table 3). The absence of a QOR member in D. melano- gaster might indicate that another enzyme has evolved for this enzyme function in the fruit-fly, as is the case for ethanol dehydrogenase activity, which is often supplied by MDR enzymes, but in the fruit-fly is supplied by a short-chain dehydrogenase [5]. The mitochondrial respiratory function proteins (MRF) family In yeast, it has been shown that SC_YBR026C is essential for mitochondrial respiratory function (MRF) [50]. This protein has clearly discernible homologues in all investi- gated eukaryotic species (Table 3), forming a family, distinguishable from the other non-zinc-containing oxido- reductases (Table 2). The human orthologue (HS ENSP 234985) may be similarly important for mitochondrial function. The active site volumes are 169–243 A ˚ 3 , indica- ting large substrates (Table 2). The substrate pocket is polar with hydrophobicity indices as low as )1.48, in contrast to that of most of the other investigated proteins. The active sites of these MRF proteins have seven out of 17 residues strictly conserved. All but two of these conserved residues are polar, contributing to an active site concluded to have many hydrogen bonds to the substrate(s). The leukotriene B 4 dehydrogenases (LTD) family LTDs form a subgroup that have members from all genomes except that of D. melanogaster. In the human genome, we find two forms (LTB4_HUMAN and hCP39255), while in C. elegans and S. cerevisiae,thereis only one form (as in E. coli). All these proteins form an orthologue cluster with reciprocal relationships better than 10 )15 (Table 3). In addition, we find 11 A. thaliana members of this type. As plants have systems of host-defence 4270 E. Nordling et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 Table 2. Members of the MDR superfamily. Active site residues correspond to the noncontinuous sequence. Annotations within parentheses are less certain due to a log E value above )20. Protein Annotation log E value Active site residues Hydro- phobicity index Depth (A ˚ ) Width (A ˚ ) Volume (A ˚ 3 ) PDH a EC_4248.yjjN Sorbitol dehydrogenase )28 CTANQ-HEVVEILRNA )0.19 13.2 7.0 212 EC_4158.yjgV L -idonate 5-dehydrogenase )136 CSYVGFHEFSEVMFRF 0.37 16.7 7.2 173 DM_7300579 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )26 SSVNR-HDLNQLCFRS )0.72 16.2 5.9 144 EC_1742.b1774 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )45 CSGFIKHEFTEVTFRY )0.18 15.8 9.1 257 AT_MSG15–5 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )60 CSYCAFHEFTEVMFRY 0.16 16.4 7.2 211 CE_R04B5.5 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )71 CSYIGFHEFTEVLFRY 0.26 16.8 7.8 226 CE_R04B5.6 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )68 CSFIGFHEFTEVLFRS 0.55 15.8 7.6 244 DM_7298873 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )79 CSYIGFHEFTEVMFRY 0.14 16.9 8.9 210 DM_7299382 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )77 CSYIGFHEFTEVMFRY 0.14 15.9 8.4 210 DHSO_HUMAN Sorbitol dehydrogenase )141 CSYIGFHEFTEVLFRY 0.26 14.6 7.8 226 Q9UMD6 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )140 CSYIGFHEFTEVLFRY 0.26 14.6 7.8 226 SC_YLR070C Sorbitol dehydrogenase )72 CSYIAYHEFTEVMFRY 0.03 12.9 8.7 176 SC_YJR159W Sorbitol dehydrogenase )137 CSYIGYHEFTEVMFRY )0.11 12.9 7.7 207 SC_YDL246C Sorbitol dehydrogenase )136 CSYIGYHEFTEVMFRY )0.11 13.3 8.4 207 EC_1744.b1776 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )23 CAHGS-HENLDAMMAY )0.24 12.5 7.0 212 EC_3538.tdh Threonine 3-dehydrogenase )130 CTIWSKHEGVDNIYGR )0.68 12.5 8.0 205 EC_2496.b2545 Sorbitol dehydrogenase )24 CSYRAKHEKYSTEWVT )1.28 13.2 7.5 202 SC_YAL61W (Sorbitol dehydrogenase) )15 CTEIFSHELAQVMMCY 0.59 9.7 6.7 145 SC_YAL60W Butanediol dehydrogenase )152 CSEIFSHEFLEVVIGY 0.77 12.1 8.5 188 EC_0598.b0608 Glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase )67 CSLIP-HELYSTRFKM )0.34 10.2 5.9 77 EC_1550.rspB Starvation sensing protein RSPB )130 CSIHN-HEVVEIFRLN 0.05 16.0 6.8 161 EC_2050.gatD Galactitol-1-phosphate )133 CSRAH-HEFSEVTWMN )0.71 12.4 8.6 220 5-dehydrogenase CAD b AT_MLD14–17 Cinnamyl-alcohol )132 CTQGM-HEYVCTFTEE )0.05 9.7 10.7 160 dehydrogenase AT_F20D10–90 Mannitol dehydrogenase )84 CSCHS-HEYVCSITQE 0.09 12.5 9.8 213 AT_F20D10–110 Mannitol dehydrogenase )91 CSMGM-HEYPCTLTQE )0.01 8.3 9.0 181 AT_F20D10–100 Mannitol dehydrogenase )89 CTMGL-HESKCTLTQE 0.00 12.5 9.8 174 AT_T22F8–230 Mannitol dehydrogenase )87 CTTGY-HEYICTLTQE )0.39 10.9 8.0 183 AT_F7D8–5 Mannitol dehydrogenase )85 CSTGF-HEYRCTLTQE )0.32 12.8 7.3 223 AT_F7D8–21 Mannitol dehydrogenase )84 CSTGF-HEYRCTLTQE )0.32 12.8 7.8 223 AT_F28P22–13 Cinnamyl-alcohol )67 CAWGD-HEFICTITQQ 0.34 12.7 7.8 198 dehydrogenase EC_0317_b0325 Mannitol dehydrogenase )61 CSQAG-HEYPCTSTQE )0.69 9.1 10.2 213 EC_4160_yjgB Mannitol dehydrogenase )41 CSMGF-HEI-CTVLRK 0.44 12.7 7.8 204 SC_YCR105W Mannitol dehydrogenase )40 CSIGP-HEMPCTLIEQ 0.49 12.5 7.4 248 SC_YMR318C Mannitol dehydrogenase )40 CSCGN-HEYPCTLLNQ )0.03 12.0 8.1 237 QOR c HS_hCP39890 (Mycocerosic acid synthase) )18 NADLQYLALGETLFLSR 0.22 17.0 7.1 201 AT_F18E5–200 Quinone oxidoreductase )28 NADLQYLALGETLPAPR )0.21 18.5 6.7 220 SC_YBR046C Quinone oxidoreductase )34 NIEYFYRISTLTNSRLY )0.41 12.5 8.7 124 EC_3946_qor Quinone oxidoreductase )121 NIDYIYTAQLLTNNRLQ )0.43 22.0 7.3 218 AT_k11j9–30 Quinone oxidoreductase )52 NIDYFYMAGMLTQARMM 0.21 11.2 8.9 137 HS_hCP34852 (Quinone oxidoreductase) )16 NSDNYYF-YPVTFLAQG )0.35 18.4 6.7 204 AT_F14J22–2 (Alcohol dehydrogenase class III) )9 NSDNFYF-VFTTMLQAG 0.13 17.6 7.0 199 HS_VAT1_HUMAN Synaptic vesicle membrane )119 MAYMVLSVTMQCHL 0.97 18.8 10.2 289 protein VAT-1 homologue HS_hCP47235 + Synaptic vesicle membrane )25 NIDMVIFAFYMTLYVLW 1.47 17.0 6.3 160 hCP1631114 protein VAT-1 homologue HS_hCP38146 Synaptic vesicle membrane )22 STHFDYALLLIENAEEA 0.04 17.0 5.5 186 protein VAT-1 homologue Ó FEBS 2002 MDR family characterizations in complete genomes (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 4271 Table 2. (Continued). Protein Annotation log E value Active site residues Hydro- phobicity index Depth (A ˚ ) Width (A ˚ ) Volume (A ˚ 3 ) CE_F39B2–3 Quinone oxidoreductase )43 NVDYIYKYGAVTNVAMS 0.14 17.2 7.4 211 HS_QOR_HUMAN Quinone oxidoreductase )123 NVEYIYSSSSITSATS- )0.05 13.4 7.1 160 AT_T5P19–110 Quinone oxidoreductase )21 NANLQYSSFLVTFVYSY 0.35 16.4 7.9 222 HS_QORL_HUMAN Quinone oxidoreductase-like 1 )139 SINKLKRILDRRGLNVW )0.55 16.0 6.2 188 AT_K15M2–24 Quinone oxidoreductase )20 NLDRIGRALTFTGLYGI 0.30 13.1 5.3 168 AT_F5O8–27 Quinone oxidoreductase )109 NVDKRFYNVKLTG-VN- )0.56 19.1 7.6 252 AT_F25G13–100 (Quinone oxidoreductase) )18 NVDKIITVLLVTPMTKK 0.51 15.7 6.9 161 DM_7295851 (ToxD protein) )7 NIDAMGRVVQYTPLTGG )0.01 16.0 6.3 234 MRF d SC_YBR026C Mitochondrial respiratory function protein )137 NSDNQYNLQQVTGFWEK )1.48 16.6 7.3 198 CE_Y48A6B_9 Mitochondrial respiratory function protein )22 NLDNRYSFSTITGFAMW )0.18 14.0 6.5 168 AT_T6D9–100 (Mitochondrial respiratory function protein) )15 NSDNRYYSPSVTGFWSW )1.08 14.1 7.1 199 DM_7303260 Mitochondrial respiratory function protein )32 NADNTYNLALVTGFWRW )0.31 18.1 7.3 243 CE_W09H1–5 (Mitochondrial respiratory function protein) )15 NADNQYNDRLVTGFWRW )1.27 16.6 6.8 202 HS_ENSP234985 Mitochondrial respiratory function protein )38 NSDNMYNANLVTGFWQW )0.68 16.1 6.3 201 LTD e AT_F2K13–110 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDYMRKEEV-TMG-IE )0.62 17.6 6.7 242 AT_F2K13–140 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDYMGKEEV-TMN-IQ )0.56 16.4 6.5 251 AT_F2K13–150 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )20 SCDYMGKEEV-TMN-IQ )0.56 19.2 5.9 251 AT_F2K13–120 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDYMGQEEV-TMN-IQ )0.54 16.5 6.6 236 AT_F2K13–130 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )34 SCDYMGQY TMN-IQ )0.45 19.5 6.0 242 AT_T17B22–23 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDYMGEGEL-TMN-IK )0.41 17.0 5.8 247 AT_F28B23–3 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )39 SCDYMGVEEV-TMN-LQ )0.13 20.3 5.9 256 AT_K18L3–100 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDHSGKEEV-TMN-VQ )0.85 17.5 6.1 249 AT_k19a23–10 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )36 SCDHSGKEEV-TMN-VQ )0.85 17.5 6.6 249 AT_F24G16–110 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )35 SCDYMRKEET-TMN-MQ )1.25 17.0 10.1 245 AT_F5I14–32 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )37 SCDYMRQEEL-TMN-LE )0.85 18.5 7.3 225 HS_LB4D_HUMAN NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )118 TVDYMKMTTI-TAP-ME )0.02 18.8 7.3 218 EC_1420_b1449 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )44 SLDYMSGQDI-TLLRLQ )0.05 11.7 6.4 161 CE_M106–3_short NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )26 SVDAQNETKV-TQHNRE )1.65 20.0 6.8 248 HS_hCP39255 NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase )26 SVDYMNQQTI-TQANRE )1.18 19.5 7.3 192 SC_YML131W (NADP-dependent leukotriene dehydrogenase) )10 SNDAQSETTI-TAG-VK )0.57 17.9 6.4 291 ACR f HS_FAS_HUMAN Fatty acid synthase )199 NRDMLLTLVKVTKLLAF 0.78 16.3 4.8 140 CE_F32H2–5 Fatty acid synthase )92 NRDMLLAILQVTKLLSI 0.91 16.2 5.5 186 4272 E. Nordling et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 like animals, but based upon linolenic [51] rather than arachidonic acid, the functions may indeed be correspond- ing. Another claim for retained function of the LTD family is that Urtica urens (nettle plant) uses leukotriene B 4 as an immunoreactive agent in the defence against herbivores [52]. These proteins may also function as allyl ADHs as they have 70% sequence identity to a protein from Nicotiana tabacum that acts on monoterpene allylic alcohols [53]. The LTD active sites all are deep and narrow (Table 2). The active site is polar in all cases but one, and for the majority of the LTD members, several charged residues are present at the active site. The active site volumes are typically around 250 A ˚ 3 , all consistent with activity on leukotrienes or similarly sized molecules. The typical residues at the active site are Ser45, Cys46, Asp47, Tyr49, Met50, Glu63, Thr128, Met241, and Asn256. The acyl-CoA reductase (ACR) family ACRs form a family (Table 2) that contributes one domain of the fatty acid synthases and erythronolide synthases [54,55]. These ACR members have active site volumes ranging from 140 to 189 A ˚ 3 and they are only found in the human, D. melanogaster and C. elegans genomes. Orthologue analysis shows that only two of the three D. melanogaster forms are closely related to the human and C. elegans forms (Table 3). The active sites are hydrophobic (index between 0.64 and 1.08) with narrow and quite deep (15–17 A ˚ ) substrate pockets consistent with the nature of their fatty acid substrates. Four leucine residues are strictly conserved at the active site. Several conserved residues are clustered at a surface corresponding to the one that is perpendicular to the subunit interacting surface in dimeric MDR forms. It seems likely that these conserved residues are involved in protein–protein inter- actions in the multienzymes of fatty acid synthase and erythronolide synthase, defining the subunit-interacting areas. Sequence patterns The sequence comparisons and subdivisions make it possible to define sequence patterns useful for characterization of MDR members. For QOR, a PROSITE pattern [56] already exists (PS01162). However, this pattern is too insensitive to find all the sequences we now classify as QOR members. It only finds five of our presently recognized 18 QOR members. The QOR family is highly divergent, which may explain the poor result of the existing pattern. Based upon the sequences now available, we propose a new pattern that Table 2. (Continued). Protein Annotation log E value Active site residues Hydro- phobicity index Depth (A ˚ ) Width (A ˚ ) Volume (A ˚ 3 ) DM_7289423 Fatty acid synthase )59 NRDMLLIMVGVTKLLSL 1.08 17.4 5.7 159 DM_7295848 Fatty acid synthase )88 NRDMLLAMVKCTKLLSV 0.64 15.6 4.8 189 DM_7295849 Fatty acid synthase )91 NRDMLLAMVKCTKLLSV 0.64 17.3 6.4 189 a Active site residues are at positions 44, 46, 50, 56, 57, 59, 69, 70, 118, 121, 155, 159, 274, 297, 298 and 299 in the numbering of DHSO_HUMAN. b Active site residues are at positions 48, 50, 54, 60, 61, 70, 71, 122, 125, 164, 168, 284, 307, 308 and 309 in the numbering of in CAD1_ARATH. c Active site residues are at positions 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 53, 64, 89, 90, 93, 124, 128, 241, 255, 264, 267 and 268 in the numbering of EC_3946_qor (QOR_ECOLI). d Active site residues are at positions 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 73, 94, 121, 122, 125, 156, 160, 285, 300, 309, 312 and 313 in the numbering of SC_YBR026C (MRF1_YEAST). e Active site residues are at positions 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 55, 63, 92, 93, 96, 128, 241, 256, 267 and 268 in the numbering of LB4D_HUMAN. f Active site residues are at positions 1567, 1569, 1570, 1572, 1573, 1576, 1586, 1611, 1612, 1615, 1645, 1649, 1766, 1781, 1790, 1793 and 1794 in the numbering of FAS_HUMAN. Table 3. Orthologues recognized within the six analysed genomes. H. sapiens D. melanogaster C. elegans A. thaliana S. cerevisiae E. coli PDH family (SDH activity) a HS_DHSO_HUMAN DM_7298873 CE_R04B5.5 AT_MSG15–5 YLR070C EC_1742_b1774 HS_Q9UMD6 DM_7299382 CE_R04B5.6 YJR159W YDL246C QOR family (QOR activity) a QOR_HUMAN – CE_F39B2.3 AT_k11j9–30 SC_YBR046C EC_3946.qor MRF family (MRF) b ENSP 234985 DM_7303260 CE_W09H1.5 AT_T6D9–100 – – ACR family (ACR activity) a,c HS_FAS_HUMAN DM_7295848_short CE_F32H2.5 – – – DM_7295849_short LTD family HS_LB4D_HUMAN (LTD activity) a HS_hCP39255 – CE_M106.3_short – d SC_YML131W EC_1420.b1449 a Shown for the human member; b shown for the S. cerevisiae member; c in one domain of fatty acid synthases; d all A. thaliana forms show equidistant relationships to the LTD forms of other species. Ó FEBS 2002 MDR family characterizations in complete genomes (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 4273 will detect better the QOR members (Table 4). It finds 15 of the QOR members, threefold more than the existing PROSITE pattern, and it misses only three QOR forms, while detecting no false positives. The sequence patterns for the PDH and the CAD subgroups are based on residues that bind the catalytic zinc and the substrate. The PDH pattern (Table 4) is somewhat complex but captures all the different substrate specificities of this group and only one false positive when the pattern is screened vs. SWISSPROT . The CAD pattern (Table 4) is shorter and is highly specific due to an additional cysteine residue in the active site region, unique to this family. It finds no false positive match and misses no one of our members. The MRF and the ACR patterns are based upon unusual sequence stretches. The MRF proteins have a highly conserved T-Y-G-G-M motif ideal to base a pattern upon. The pattern finds all the members and no false positive matches from SWISSPROT (Table 4). The ACR pattern is based upon a sequence stretch with many aromatic residues, including two tryptophan residues, which are suitable for pattern recognition as this is the least frequently occurring amino acid (Table 4). The pattern for the LTD group is based upon the comparatively hydrophilic nature of the active site in this subgroup, is very specific, and recovers all members with no false positive matches in SWISSPROT (Table 4). The patterns are useful for proper recognition of new genomic sequences. They allow rapid annotation into the different families of the MDR superfamily of the huge amounts of sequences generated by ongoing genome projects. They are also ideal for finding particular enzymes in the ever increasing sequence databases. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research and Karolinska Institutet is grate- fully acknowledged. REFERENCES 1. Persson,B.,Zigler,J.S.Jr&Jo ¨ rnvall, H. (1994) A super-family of medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR). Sub-lines including f-crystallin, alcohol and polyol dehydrogenases, quinone oxidoreductase, enoyl reductases, VAT-1 and other proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 226, 15–22. 2. Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J O. & Persson, B. (1999) SDR and MDR: completed genome sequences show these protein families to be large, of old origin, and of complex nature. FEBS Lett. 445,261– 264. 3. Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J O., Persson, B. & Pare ´ s, X. (2000) Phar- macogenetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase system. Am. J. Phar- macol. 61, 184–191. 4. Marschall, H U., Oppermann, U.C., Svensson, S., Nordling, E., Persson, B., Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J O. & Jo ¨ rnvall, H. (2000) Human liver class I alcohol dehydrogenase cc isozyme: the sole cytosolic 3beta- hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase of iso bile acids. Hepatology 31, 990–996. 5. Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Persson, M. & Jeffery, J. (1981) Alcohol and polyol dehydrogenases are both divided into two protein types, and structural properties cross-relate the different enzyme activ- ities within each type. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4226–4230. 6. Yancey, P.H., Clark, M.E., Hand, S.C., Bowlus, R.D. & Somero, G.N. (1982) Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte sys- tems. Science 217, 1214–1222. 7. Czajka, M.C. & Lee, R.E. Jr (1990) A rapid cold-hardening response protecting against cold shock injury in Drosophila mel- anogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 148, 245–254. 8. Wolfe, G.R., Smith, C.A., Hendrix, D.L. & Salvucci, M.E. (1999) Molecular basis for thermoprotection in Bemisia: structural dif- ferences between whitefly ketose reductase and other medium- chain dehydrogenases/reductases. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29, 113–120. 9. Chakrabarti, S., Cukiernik, M., Hileeto, D., Evans, T. & Chen, S. (2000) Role of vasoactive factors in the pathogenesis of early changes in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 16, 393–407. 10.Boudet,A.M.,Lapierre,C.&Grima-Pettenati,J.(1995)Bio- chemistry and molecularbiology of lignification. New Phytol. 129, 203–236. 11. Sarni, F., Grand, C. & Boudet, A.M. (1984) Purification and properties of cinnamoyl-CoA reductase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase from poplar stems (Populus X euramericana). Eur. J. Biochem. 139, 259–265. 12. Halpin, C., Knight, M.E., Foxon, G.A., Campbell, M., Boudet, A.M., Boon, J.J., Chabbert, B., Tollier, M.T. & Schuch, W. (1994) Manipulation of lignin quality by down-regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant J. 6, 339–350. 13. Galliano, H., Cabane, M., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., San- dermann, H. Jr & Ernst, D. (1993) Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and elicitor-/ozone-induced accumulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase from Norway spruce (Picea abies L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 23, 145–156. 14. Persson, B., Hallborn, J., Walfridsson, M., Hahn-Ha ¨ gerdal, B., Kera ¨ nen, S., Penttila ¨ ,M.&Jo ¨ rnvall, H. (1993) Dual relationships of xylitol and alcohol dehydrogenases in families of two protein types. FEBS Lett. 324, 9–14. 15. Campbell, M.M. & Sederoff, R.R. (1995) Variation in lignin content and composition. Mechanisms of control and implications for the genetic improvement of plants. Plant Physiol. 110, 3–13. 16.Gonzalez,P.,Rao,P.V.,Nunez,S.B.&Zigler,J.S.Jr(1995) Evidence for independent recruitment of f-crystallin/quinone Table 4. Sequence patterns and screening results. The column hits gives number of MDR forms detected in the six genomes investigated, fp (false positives) gives number of nonmembers detected in SWISSPROT , fn (false negatives) gives the number of proteins classified as a member but not found by the pattern. Group Pattern hits fp fn QOR [GAS]-x-N-x(2)-[DEN]-x(5)-G-x(6,19)-[PS]-x(3)-[GA]-x-[ED]-x(2)-G-x-[VIL]-x(3)-G 15 0 3 MRF L-x(6)-[VL]-T-Y-G-G-M-[SA]-[KR] 600 PDH [GA]-[VIL]-[CS]-[GN]-[STA]-D-[VILMS]-[HKP]-x(14,27)-G-H-[ED]-x(2)-G-x-[VI]-x(10,12)-G-[DEQ]-x-[IV] 22 1 0 CAD C-G-x-C-x(2)-D-x(17)-G-H-E 12 0 0 LTD D-x-[YF]-x-[DE]-N-V-G-[GS]-x(3)-[DEN] 16 0 0 ACR W-x(5)-W-x(8)-P-x(2)-Y-x(3)-Y-Y 500 4274 E. Nordling et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 reductase (CRYZ) as a crystallin in camelids and hystricomorph rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 773–781. 17. Rao, P.V., Gonzalez, P., Persson, B., Jo ¨ rnvall,H.,Garland,D.& Zigler, J.S. Jr (1997) Guinea pig and bovine f-crystallins have distinct functional characteristics highlighting replacements in otherwise similar structures. Biochemistry 36, 5353–5362. 18. Bra ¨ nde ´ n, C.I., Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Eklund, H. & Furugren, B. (1975) Alcohol dehydrogenases. In The Enzymes,3rdedn.(Boyer,P.D., ed.), pp. 104–190. Academic Press, New York. 19. Venter, J.C., Adams, M.D., Myers, E.W., Li, P.W., Mural, R.J., Sutton, G.G., Smith, H.O., Yandell, M., Evans, C.A., Holt, R.A. et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304– 1351. 20. Lander, E.S., Linton, L.M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M.C., Baldwin,J.,Devon,K.,Dewar,K.,Doyle,M.,FitzHugh,W.et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921. 21. Adams, M.D., Celniker, S.E., Holt, R.A., Evans, C.A., Gocayne, J.D., Amanatides, P.G., Scherer, S.E., Li, P.W., Hoskins, R.A., Galle, R.F. et al. (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195. 22. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018. 23. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815. 24. Goffeau, A., Barrell, B.G., Bussey, H., Davis, R.W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H. & Galibert, F. (1996) Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 563–567. 25. Blattner, F.R., Plunkett, G. III, Bloch, C.A., Perna, N.T., Bur- land, V., Riley, M., Collado-Vides, J., Glasner, J.D., Rode, C.K., Mayhew, G.F., Gregor, J., Davis, N.W., Kirkpatrick, H.A., Goeden, M.A., Rose, D.J., Mau, B. & Shao, Y. (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277, 1453–1474. 26. Pearson, W.R. & Lipman, D.J. (1988) Improved tools for biolo- gical sequence comparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2444– 2448. 27. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673– 4680. 28. Swofford, D.L. (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Par- simony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 29. Page, R.D. (1996) TreeView: an application to display phyloge- netic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 357– 358. 30. Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. (2000) The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 45–48. 31. Abagyan, R. & Totrov, M. (1994) Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 983–1002. 32. Banfield, M.J., Salvucci, M.E., Baker, E.N. & Smith, C.A. (2001) Crystal structure of the NADP(H)-dependent ketose reductase from Bemisia argentifolii at 2.3 A ˚ resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 306, 239–250. 33. Thorn, J.M., Barton, J.D., Dixon, N.E., Ollis, D.L. & Edwards, K.J. (1995) Crystal structure of Escherichia coli QOR quinone oxidoreductase complexed with NADPH. J. Mol. Biol. 249, 785– 799. 34. Cho, H., Ramaswamy, S. & Plapp, B.V. (1997) Flexibility of liver alcohol dehydrogenase in stereoselective binding of 3-butylthio- lane 1-oxides. Biochemistry 36, 382–389. 35. Abagyan, R., Batalov, S., Cardozo, T., Totrov, M., Webber, J. & Zhou, Y. (1997) Homology modeling with internal coordinate mechanics: deformation zone mapping and improve- ments of models via conformational search. Proteins supplement 1, 29–37. 36. Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R.F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105–132. 37. Danielsson, O. & Jo ¨ rnvall, H. (1992) ÔEnzymogenesisÕ: classical liver alcohol dehydrogenase origin from the glutathione-depend- ent formaldehyde dehydrogenase line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9247–9251. 38. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Durbin, R., Eddy, S.R., Finn, R.D. & Sonnhammer, E.L.L. (1999) Pfam 3.1: 1313 multiple align- ments match the majority of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 260–262. 39. Tatusov, R.L., Natale, D.A., Garkavtsev, I.V., Tatusova, T.A., Shankavaram, U.T., Rao, B.S., Kiryutin, B., Galperin, M.Y., Fedorova, N.D. & Koonin, E.V. (2001) The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 22–28. 40. Nordling, E., Persson, B. & Jo ¨ rnvall,H.(2002)Differentialmultipli- city of MDR alcohol dehydrogenases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59, 1070–1075. 41. Hjelmqvist, L., Shafqat, J., Siddiqi, A.R. & Jo ¨ rnvall, H. (1996) Linking of isozyme and class variability patterns in the emerg- ence of novel alcohol dehydrogenase functions. Characterization of isozymes in Uromastix hardwickii. Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 563– 570. 42. Johansson,K.,El-Ahmad,M.,Kaiser,C.,Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Eklund, H., Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J. & Ramaswamy, S. (2001) Crystal structure of sorbitol dehydrogenase. Chem. Biol. Interact. 130–132, 351–358. 43. Vallee, B.L. & Auld, D.S. (1990) Active-site zinc ligands and activated H2O of zinc enzymes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 220–224. 44. Karlsson, C., Jo ¨ rnvall, H. & Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J O. (1995) Zinc binding of alcohol and sorbitol dehydrogenases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 372, 397–406. 45. Wierenga, R.K., Terpstra, P. & Hol, W.G. (1986) Prediction of the occurrence of the ADP-binding beta alpha beta-fold in proteins, using an amino acid sequence fingerprint. J. Mol. Biol. 187, 101– 107. 46. Jo ¨ rnvall, H., Danielsson, O., Ho ¨ o ¨ g, J O. & Persson, B. (1993) Alcohol dehydrogenase: patterns of protein evolution. In: Meth- ods in Protein Sequence Analysis (Imahori, K. & Sakiyama, F., eds), pp. 275–282. Plenum, New York. 47. Bentley, R. (1990) The shikimate pathway – a metabolic tree with many branches. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 307–384. 48. Rao, P.V. & Zigler, J.S. Jr (1991) f-Crystallin from guinea pig lens is capable of functioning catalytically as an oxidoreductase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 284, 181–185. 49. Mano, J., Babiychuk, E., Belles-Boix, E., Hiratake, J., Kimura, A., Inze, D., Kushnir, S. & Asada, K. (2000) A novel NADPH: dia- mide oxidoreductase activity in Arabidopsis thaliana P1 f-crystal- lin. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 3661–3671. 50. Yamazoe, M., Shirahige, K., Rashid, M.B., Kaneko, Y., Nakay- ama, T., Ogasawara, N. & Yoshikawa, H. (1994) A protein which binds preferentially to single-stranded core sequence of autono- mously replicating sequence is essential for respiratory function in mitochondrial of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15244–15252. 51. Bergey, D.R., Howe, G.A. & Ryan, C.A. (1996) Polypeptide signaling for plant defensive genes exhibits analogies to def- ense signaling in animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12053– 12058. 52. Czarnetzki, B.M., Thiele, T. & Rosenbach, T. (1990) Immuno- reactive leukotrienes in nettle plants (Urtica urens). Int. Arch. Allergy. Appl. Immunol. 91, 43–46. Ó FEBS 2002 MDR family characterizations in complete genomes (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) 4275 53. Hirata, T., Tamura, Y., Yokobatake, N., Shimoda, K. & Ashida, Y. (2000) A 38 kDa allylic alcohol dehydrogenase from the cul- tured cells of Nicotiana tabacum. Phytochemistry 55, 297–303. 54. Amy, C.M., Witkowski, A., Naggert, J., Williams, B., Randhawa, Z. & Smith, S. (1989) Molecular cloning and sequencing of cDNAs encoding the entire rat fatty acid synthase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 3114–3118. 55. Donadio, S., Staver, M.J., McAlpine, J.B., Swanson, S.J. & Katz, L. (1991) Modular organization of genes required for complex polyketide biosynthesis. Science 252, 675–679. 56. Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Falquet, L. & Bairoch, A. (1999) The PROSITE database, its status in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 27,215– 219. 4276 E. Nordling et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 269) Ó FEBS 2002 . Medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR) Family characterizations including genome comparisons and active site modelling Erik Nordling 1,2 ,. diagnostic for the different families and can be used in genome annotations. Keywords: medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases; genome comparisons; polyol dehydrogenase;