Mammalianmitoticcentromere-associatedkinesin (MCAK)
A newmoleculartargetofsulfoquinovosylacylglycerols novel
antitumor andimmunosuppressive agents
Satoko Aoki
1,2
, Keisuke Ohta
1
, Takayuki Yamazaki
1
, Fumio Sugawara
1,2
and Kengo Sakaguchi
1,2
1 Department of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
2 Genome and Drug Research Center, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
Several kinds of synthetic sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols
(SQAGs) may be potent and clinically promising
agents for cancer chemotherapy and immunosuppres-
sion [1,2]. However, the molecular targets of SQAGs
are ambiguous. The aim of the present study was to
identify molecular targets that could be of significance.
Earlier, effects of SQAGs were found and reported
independently by two laboratories screening directly
for antitumoragents in vivo [1] and for mammalian
DNA polymerase inhibitors in vitro [3–5]. One mole-
cular targetof SQAGs is thus DNA polymerases [6]
but there is a strong evidence for other targets [7–9].
SQAGs are found as natural compounds in higher
plants [3], sea algae [4,5] and sea urchins [1]. They
have been reported to have a wide range of bioactivi-
ties: antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV-1) [7], P-selectin receptor inhibition [8],
antitumor activity [1], tumor cell growth inhibition [6]
and immunosuppressive activity [2]. Sahara et al.
showed that SQAGs effectively inhibit the growth of
implanted human lung adenocarcinoma cells, A549, in
nude mice [1]. Moreover, Ohta et al. reported that a
wide variety of cultured tumor cells were sensitive to
SQAGs [6]. It is very difficult to collect and purify
SQAGs from natural sources but we have succeeded in
the chemical synthesis ofa number of forms. We have
found a-anomers that possess potent antitumor activ-
ity but do not have many of the serious side-effects of
Keywords
mammalian DNA polymerases; MT
depolymerization activity of MCAK; SQAGs;
T7 phage display method
Correspondence
K. Sakaguchi, Department of Applied
Biological Science, Tokyo University of
Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278–
8510, Japan
Fax: +81 4 7123 9767
Tel: +81 4 7124 1501 (ext. 3409)
E-mail: kengo@rs.noda.tus.ac.jp
(Received 30 October 2004, revised 20
January 2005, accepted 7 February 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04600.x
Sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols (SQAGs), in particular compounds with C18
fatty acid(s) on the glycerol moiety, may be clinically promising antitumor
and ⁄ or immunosuppressive agents. They were found originally as inhibitors
of mammalian DNA polymerases. However, SQAGs can arrest cultured
mammalian cells not only at S phase but also at M phase, suggesting they
have several molecular targets. A screen for candidate target molecules
using a T7 phage display method identified an amino acid sequence. An
homology search showed this to be amammalianmitotic centromere-asso-
ciated kinesin (MCAK), rather than a DNA polymerase. Analyses showed
SQAGs bound to recombinant MCAK with a K
D
¼ 3.1 · 10
)4
to
6.2 · 10
)5
m.Anin vivo microtubule depolymerization assay, using EGFP-
full length MCAK fusion constructs, indicated inhibition of the micro-
tubule depolymerization activity of MCAK. From these results, we
conclude that clinically promising SQAGs have at least two different
molecular targets, DNA polymerases and MCAK. It should be stressed
that inhibitors of MCAK have never been reported previously so that there
is a major potential for clinical utility.
Abbreviations
a-SQDG(18:0), saturated 1,2-O-diacyl-3-O-(a-
D-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride; b-SQDG(18:0), saturated 1,2-O-diacyl-3-O-(b-D-sulfoquinovosyl)-
glyceride; a-SQMG(18:0), saturated 1-O-monoacyl-3-O-(a-
D-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride; a-SQMG(18:1), unsaturated 1-O-monoacyl-3-O-(a-D-
sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; MCAK, mitotic centromere-associated
kinesin; MTs, microtubules; MCAK184, His
6
-tagged MCAK truncated form (P184-G593); SQAGs, sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols.
2132 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS
standard cancer chemotherapeutics [10]. In contrast,
b-anomers did not show antitumorogenicity but
were toxic to lymphocytes [2]. The active SQAGs are
1-O-monoacyl-3-O-(a-d-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride with
saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, and 1,2-O-diacyl-
3-O-(a-d-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride and 1,2-O-diacyl-3-
O-(b-d-sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride, both with saturated
fatty acids [11]. The degree of inhibitory activity is
greatly dependent upon the size of the fatty acid;
SQAGs with fatty acid elements with fewer than 14
carbons do not show inhibitory effects in vitro or
in vivo [10,11]. Our studies have identified possible
discrepancies with regard to mechanistic aspects of
SQAG activity in cancer cells. These compounds are
considered to block replicative DNA synthesis by sup-
pressing the activity of the DNA polymerases, thus
arresting the cell cycle at S and consequently killing
the cancer cells. However, aphidicolin, a well-estab-
lished DNA polymerase inhibitor with cytotoxicity
very similar to SQAGs, shows little bioactivity in vivo.
As shown previously, moreover, SQAGs arrest cells
not only at the S but also at M phase [6]. These obser-
vations allow us to speculate that other molecular tar-
gets may be involved in vivo, possibly inducing cell
death.
T7 phage display methods are powerful and high
throughput tools for in vitro [12] and in vivo [13] iden-
tification of peptides or protein ligands. In this study,
we used a T7 phage display method in combination
with immobilized biotinylated SQAG prepared on an
avidin solid phase [14–16]. A sequence was thereby
identified that exhibited similarity with human mitotic
centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK). Kinesins are
molecules that convert chemical energy into physical
reactions to perform functions such as vesicle trans-
port, chromosome segregation, and organization of the
mitotic spindle. Therefore, one of the other targets of
the SQAGs is probably a MCAK. We show here that
SQAGs suppress microtubule depolymerization by
binding to MCAK. To our knowledge, this is the first
report of an inhibitor to MCAK.
Results
Screening for peptide sequences selectively
binding to SQAG in the T7 phage random
peptide library
We selected four representative SQAGs for binding
analysis: 1-O-monoacyl-3-O-(a-d-sulfoquinovosyl)-gly-
ceride with saturated [a-SQMG(18:0)] or unsaturated
fatty acid [a-SQMG(18:1)]; 1,2-O-diacyl-3-O-(a-d-
sulfoquinovosyl)-glyceride with saturated fatty acid
[a-SQDG(18:0)]; and, 1,2-O-diacyl-3-O-(b-d-sulfo-
quinovosyl)-glyceride with saturated fatty acid
[b-SQDG(18:0)] (Fig. 1A). Although the distribution
of a- and b-anomers in the body would be expected
to differ [10], the levels of the cytotoxicity are similar
when the size of the fatty acid is the same [6]. Each
chemically pure compound was synthesized in our
laboratory. For screening peptides specifically binding
to SQAGs, 1.5 · 10
8
p.f.u. per 30 lL of the T7 phage
library expressed random peptide sequences was
applied onto streptavidin-coated wells bearing an
immobilized SQAG biotinylated derivative (Fig. 1B).
We found that effective biopannning required a
Fig. 1. (A) Structure of SQAGs: structure 1, R
1
¼ CH
3
(CH
2
)
16
CO;
R
2
¼ H[a-SQMG(18:0)]. Structure 2, R
1
¼ CH
3
(CH
2
)
7
CH¼
CH(CH
2
)
7
CO; R
2
¼ H[a-SQMG(18 : 1)]. Structure 3, R
1
¼ R
2
¼
CH
3
(CH
2
)
16
CO [a-SQDG(18:0)]; Structure 4, R
3
¼ R
4
¼
CH
3
(CH
2
)
16
CO [b-SQDG(18:0)]. (B) Biotinylated derivative, SQAG.
S. Aoki et al. Amoleculartargetof SQAGs
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS 2133
number of rounds of elution with 1.5 m NaI followed
by washing with 0.1% Tween-20 in 100 mm Tris ⁄ HCl
(pH 8.0). An illustrative example of the results of bio-
panning is shown in Fig. 2. For b-SQDG(18:0), the
recovery rate of round 5 (i.e. the eluted fraction of 5th
biopanning) was 7.7%, which was almost sixfold
higher than those of rounds 1–4. The DNA sequences
of 47 clones picked from round 5 were analyzed, and
finally, an oligopeptide sequence was obtained as the
clone which was highly concentrated. It was composed
of 14 amino acids (NSRMRVRNATTYNS), and here-
after is called ‘clone-14’ for convenience.
When the binding titer of the phage ‘clone-14’ on
the b-SQDG(18:0)-solid phase was compared to the
unselected clone (Fig. 3), the recovery rate of the for-
mer was 5.1-fold higher. The ‘unselected clone’ which
harbored five amino acids (NSNTR), was hardly con-
centrated in round 5 at all. The data indicate that
‘clone-14’ was effectively concentrated in the bio-
panning procedure, presumably due to selective bind-
ing to the b-SQDG(18:0) molecule. As indicated
below, as with the other a-anomeric SQAGs used,
a-SQMG(18:0), a-SQMG(18:1) and a-SQDG(18:0)
also bind tightly and selectively to ‘clone-14’, binding
must be unrelated to the anomeric structure (Table 1).
A homology search (fasta3) demonstrated that the
amino acid sequence of ‘clone-14’ is similar to the ‘neck
region’ of the rat, human and mouse mitotic centro-
mere-associated kinesin(MCAK) (Fig. 4) [17–19]. Kine-
sin family proteins generally contain the motor domain
in the N- or C-terminal of the primary sequence, and the
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12345
round
Recovery rate (%)
Fig. 2. Biopanning for selecting peptide sequence bound to the
SQAG molecule. The graphic indicates the process of biopanning.
A biotinylated derivative of b-SQDG(18:0) was immobilized on a
Streptavidin-coated well, and then incubated with the T7 phage lib-
rary composed of cDNA fragment inserts from Drosophila melano-
gaster. In every round, unbound phages were removed by washing
three times with 100 m
M Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 8.0) containing 0.1% (v ⁄ v)
Tween-20, and bound phages were eluted with 200 lL of 1.5
M
NaI at 4 °C, overnight. Recovery rate (%) ¼ [titer of the elute frac-
tion (p.f.u.) ⁄ titer of input (p.f.u.)] · 100. These data are shown as
the averages of two individual experiments.
Fig. 3. Comparison of affinity for SQAG between the clone-14 and
unselected clone. Binding strengths of clone-14 and unselected
clone on SQAG molecule were compared. Both clones were puri-
fied, amplified and adjusted the titer to 1.0 · 10
13
p.f.u.ÆmL
)1
.One
hundred microliters of each clone were applied onto SQAG-solid
phase. The washing and the eluting conditions were same as those
of biopanning in Fig. 2. The biotinylated SQAG did not immobilize
on the control well. Increase rate of recovery for control ¼ titer of
SQAG immobilized well ⁄ titer of control well.
Table 1. SPR analysis of the binding of SQAGs to the immobilized
peptide, MCAK184 on a CM5 sensor chip. A synthetic peptide and
MCAK184 were coupled to the CM5 sensor chips. Binding analy-
ses of SQAGs were performed in running buffer (Experimental pro-
cedures) at a flow rate of 20 lLÆmin
)1
at 25 °C. BIAEVALUATION 3.1
software was used to determine the kinetic parameters.
SQMG
K
D
(10
)7
M)
14aa MCAK184
a-SQMG (18:0) 1700 3100
a-SQMG (18:1) 8.7 620
a-SQDG (18:0) 130 9800
b-SQDG (18:0) 15 490
A
B
Fig. 4. Alignment between clone-14 amino acids sequence and
human MCAK (A) Clone-14 amino acid sequence indicated similarity
to N212-S225 of human MCAK. (B) The similarity site (marked by
upward arrow ⁄ tripple underline) is a ‘neck region’ in MCAK. This
region affects the depolymerization activity of MCAK [20,29].
A moleculartargetof SQAGs S. Aoki et al.
2134 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS
position predicts the direction of walking on micro-
tubules. MCAK belongs to the Kin I subfamily and its
motor domain, unlike most kinesins, is in the interior of
the protein. Moreover, the protein localizes at centro-
meres, performs roles in the depolymerization of micro-
tubules, and affects chromosome segregation. The neck
region is adjacent to the N-terminus of the motor
domain in MCAK. From a study using a truncated
form, the neck region appears to be essential for micro-
tubule depolymerization activity. Our previous data
indicated that SQAGs arrest cultured cells not only at
the S phase but also at M phase, the place in which
microtubule depolymerization occurs [6]. Therefore,
SQAGs may inhibit microtubule depolymerization
activity and thereby induce cell death. For this reason,
we focused on the molecular interactions between
SQAGs and the recombinant MCAK.
Kinetic parameters via surface plasmon
resonance (SPR) analysis of binding between
SQAG and MCAK
The full length MCAK protein is not soluble and is
found in inclusion bodies. Therefore binding between
SQAGs anda truncated version (MCAK184) was
tested using a Biosensor BIAcore instrument. The
MCAK184 contains the neck region and the Kinesin
motor domain (Fig. 5). Three or four different concen-
trations of each of the four SQAG [1–4] derivatives
shown in Fig. 1 were employed for analyses of the
bindings to CM5 sensor chip conjugated 14aa or
MCAK184. The dissociation constants K
D
(m) were
determined using the biaevaluation 3.1 software
(Table 1). Values with 14aa were in the range of
K
D
¼ 1.3 · 10
)5
to 8.7 · 10
)7
m, and for MCAK184
were K
D
¼ 3.1 · 10
)4
to 6.2 · 10
)5
m.
SQAG inhibits the depolymerization activity
of MCAK in vitro
To test the possibility that the interaction of SQAGs
and MCAK184 inhibited depolymerization of MTs, we
performed an in vitro depolymerization assay in the
same manner as reported previously [20–22]. The trun-
cated MCAK constructed as a His
6
-tagged truncated
form (P184-G593; MCAK184), containing the neck
and motor domains (Fig. 5A), was purified to near
homogeneity (Fig. 5B). Depolymerization of the tubu-
lin polymer could be detected in SDS ⁄ PAGE as an
abundance ofa band of tubulin molecules released into
the supernatant. The in vitro depolymerization reac-
tions contained 120 nm MCAK184 and 1500 nm of
taxol-stabilized microtubules (taxol-stabilized MTs).
MCAK184 depolymerized MTs in vitro, when incuba-
ted at 24 °C for 30 min, but only in the presence of
1mm ATP (Fig. 6A). The presence of the ATPase
inhibitor AMPPNP abolished depolymerization activity
(Fig. 6A). Figure 6B shows the effects of 19.6 lm
a-SQMG(18:1) and 3.2 lm b-SQDG(18:0) on the
depolymerization reaction. The concentrations of the
SQAGs used were chosen from the minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) with MCAK184. In this case, the
reaction mixture contained 2% dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO), because of the solubility of the SQAGs.
DMSO had no effect on the reaction (Fig. 6B, upper
panel). Both a-SQMG(18:1) and b-SQDG(18:0) clearly
inhibited the depolymerization (Fig. 6B, middle and
lower panels). a-SQMG(18:0) and a-SQDG(18:0)
tended also showed the same inhibition pattern (data
not shown). Thus, at least under in vitro conditions,
SQAGs inhibit the depolymerization activity of MCAK
by selective binding. The tightness of binding may
determine the degree of inhibition.
SQAGs inhibit the depolymerization activity
of MCAK in vivo
To elucidate the MT-depolymerizing effects of SQAGs
in vivo, the fusion constructs of EGFP-full length
MCAK were transfected into cultured cells. After fix-
ation, the cells were stained for tubulin and DAPI
(Fig. 7) and digital images were acquired using a
A
B
Fig. 5. Construction and purification of MCAK184 (A) Schematic
representation of the truncated form of the human MCAK con-
struct. The homology domain is a ‘clone-14’ sequence. This con-
struct was subcloned into pET21a vector and expression in
BL21(DE3)-pLysS. (B) Western blotting of MCAK 184. The crude
extract was loaded onto an HiTrap Chelating HP column, then the
eluted fraction was subjected to SDS ⁄ PAGE and then transfered to
a poly(vinylidene difluoride) membrane. The membrane was stained
with anti-His
6
Ig and alkaline phosphatase. A single band was
present that corresponded to the molecular mass of MCAK184
(49 kDa).
S. Aoki et al. Amoleculartargetof SQAGs
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS 2135
cooled CCD camera. Loss of microtubule polymers
was observed in controls not treated with a-
SQMG(18:1) (Fig. 7Ab, unfilled arrow), indicating that
the polymers are rapidly depolymerized. However, in
the presence of a-SQMG(18:1), the polymers were not
depolymerized (Fig. 7Ae).
Figure 7B shows numbers of stained cells at various
concentrations of a-SQMG(18:1). The data are from
three independent experiments. The numbers of the
cells showing depolymerization of tubulin decreased
in a dose-dependent manner with increase in
a-SQMG(18:1). Similar effects were exhibited by the
other SQAGs (data not shown).
Discussion
In the present study, we have shown, using a T7 phage
display method, that mammalianmitotic centromere-
associated kinesin(MCAK) is amoleculartarget of
SQAGs. The SQAGs inhibit the MCAK function and
are likely to bind to its ‘neck region’. As this M-type
kinesin is localized at centromeres and depolymerizes
microtubules from their ends, an important feature of
remodeling during mitosis [20–23], it is conceivable
A
B
Fig. 6. Inhibition of the microtuble depolymerization activity of
MCAK184 by SQAG in vitro. In all assays, 120 n
M of MCAK,
1500 n
M of paclitaxel stabilized microtubles, SQAGs, and reaction
components were mixed, and then were incubated at 24 °C for
30 min. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 223 000 g and the
supernatant and the pellet were separated. (A) MCAK184 can depo-
lymerize microtubles in vitro. From left to right, paclitaxel stabilized
MTs were incubated without MCAK184, with MCAK184 and ATP,
with MCAK184 alone, and with MCAK184 and AMPPNP. Depoly-
merized microtubules were visualized in the lane of the supernatant
(S), and polymerized in the lane of pellet (P). (B) SQAGs inhibited
the depolymerization of microtubles. There were 2% DMSO and
ATP in all samples. (Upper) MCAK 184 was incubated with 2%
DMSO; (Middle) with 19.6 l
M,4.9lM of a-SQMG(18:1); (Lower)
with 3.2 l
M,0.8lM of b-SQDG(18:0).
A
B
Fig. 7. Inhibition on tublin depolymerization in CHO-cell transfected
with EGFP-MCAK. CHO cells transfected with EGFP-full length
MCAK were treated with a-SQMG(18:1). (A) (a–c) Control experi-
ment. (d–f) Photographs of cells treated with aSQMG (18:1). (a,d)
EGFP-MCAK, (b,e) staining with anti-tubulin Ig, (c,f) DAPI staining.
White arrow in b indicates a loss of microtubule polymer and low
intensity unpolymerized tublin staining. (B) The proportion of the
cells with depolymerized MTs was affected by the concentration of
a-SQMG(18:1). CHO cells were treated with 0 (control), 0.2, 2.3,
22.8 lM of SQAG for 24 h. The ‘depolymerized cell’ on Y-axis indi-
cates the number of tublin-unstained cell in 10 of EGFP-MCAK
expressed cell. The bar shows the standard deviation (n ¼ 5).
A moleculartargetof SQAGs S. Aoki et al.
2136 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS
that the anticancer effects of SQAGs are dependent on
the inhibition of MCAK.
Although the SQAGs were found as inhibitors of
mammalian DNA polymerases [3–5, 24], the impact on
these enzymes appears too weak to explain their in vivo
anticancer activity and their weak cytotoxicity. We
reported previously that SQAGs can not only arrest
cells at S phase but also at M phase [6]; thus the two dif-
ferent cell cycle phases may be impacted simultaneously.
SQAGs can be separated roughly into two groups
according to the number of fatty acid molecules: diacyl-
forms (SQDGs) and monoacyl-forms (SQMGs). Both
are sulfonic analogs of d-glucose bound with glycerol
and fatty acids. Our present results showed that the var-
ious derivatives of SQAG may strongly inhibit MCAK
activity. This inhibition may be independent of their
anomeric forms, as it is the case for their DNA poly-
merase inhibitor. Chemical synthesis of SQMG ⁄ SQDG
derivatives produces both a- and b-anomers. The b-ano-
mer is not present in nature. As described previously,
a-anomers of synthetic SQMG ⁄ SQDG derivatives could
be potent antitumoragents without severe side-effects.
In mice exposed to these agents, the immunosuppressive
effect was minor and the main visceral organs showed
no histological evidence of toxicity [10]. On the other
hand, the b-anomer may be potent immunosuppressive
agents with toxic effects on lymphocytes [2]. Therefore,
synthetic SQMG ⁄ SQDG, chemically composed only of
carbohydrate glycerol and fatty acids, could be ideal
cancer-chemotherapeutic and ⁄ or immunosuppressive
agents that could be applied clinically for longer peri-
ods. The reason for tissue-specific toxicity dependent on
the different configuration can be explained by the
inhibition of neither DNA polymerases nor MCAK,
pointing to the possibility of further molecular targets.
As DNA polymerases are essential for DNA replica-
tion and repair, their inhibition will induce cell cycle
arrest at the S phase. The MIC ranges for DNA
polymerases in vitro were low at 1–50 lm [6,11], while
cytotoxicity was evident at 50–100 lm. Inhibition of
MCAK activity occurred at 0.8–20 lm. Therefore, cell
death in vitro may occur as a result of synergistic
actions. SQAGs are also known to act against inflam-
mation [25], respiration of spermatozoa [26–28],
HIV-RT (human immunodeficiency virus-reverse tran-
scriptase) [4,5,7], AIDS virus [4], the P-selectin receptor
[8] and a-glucosidase [29]. With the exception of the
last two, the in vivo molecular targets for these effects
have yet to be elucidated. Interestingly, the binding
analysis of SQAGs and MCAK184 showed that the
kinetic constant (K
D
) for the interaction between
a-SQMG(18:1) and MCAK184 was lowest recorded
(6.2 · 10
)5
m) (Table 1). Of the SQAGs used here,
a-SQMG(18:1) is the strongest anticancer agent [10],
suggesting that the tightness of binding to MCAK is
important for in vivo bioactivity. As described previ-
ously, the inhibition of DNA polymerases occurs by
tight binding to molecular pockets on their surfaces.
The degree of inhibition depends on the K
D
(m)
between the SQAG and the enzyme.
Although there are many drugs that bind tubulin
directly (such as paclitaxel or nocodazole, which over-
or understabilize microtubules, respectively), a drug that
targets the M-type kinesin has never been reported.
Thus the SQAGs may be of particular significance, not
only with regard to their clinical applications, but also
for analysis of the functions of MCAK.
Experimental procedures
SQAGs
SQAGs anda biotinylated derivative of SQAG were syn-
thesized in our laboratory (Fig. 1) [3–5,14].
Construction ofa T7 phage library from
Drosophila melanogaster
Random primers, 5¢-methylated dCTP, T4 DNA poly-
merase, T4 ligase, EcoRI ⁄ HindIII linkers, EcoRI, HindIII,
T7Select10–3b vector, and T7 packaging extracts were pur-
chased from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany) [15]. Con-
struction of the phage library was carried out according to
the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, aliquots (80 lg) of
total RNA, extracted from D. melanogaster Kc cells, (pro-
vided by M Yamaguchi, Kyoto Institute of Technology,
Japan) were used to construct a cDNA library. Total RNA
was treated with Oligotex-dT30 super (Takara, Shiga,
Japan) to produce poly(A)+ RNA suitable for random
primed cDNA synthesis. cDNA synthesis was performed
using 4 lg of poly(A)+ RNA. 5¢-Methylated dCTP was
then incorporated into both strands, without extraction or
precipitation between the first and second strand synthesis.
The cDNA was then treated with T4 DNA polymerase to
generate flush ends and ligated with directional EcoRI ⁄ Hin-
dIII linkers. Following linker ligation, the cDNA was diges-
ted sequentially with EcoRI and HindIII, then inserted into
EcoRI ⁄ HindIII digested T7Select10–3b vector arms. The
cDNA was cloned into the EcoRI ⁄ HindIII site of the T7
phage 10–3b vector and packaged into phage [15]. The titer
of this library was 1.6 · 10
10
p.f.u.ÆmL
)1
.
T7 phage clone biopanning procedure and DNA
sequence analysis
A biotinylated derivative of SQAG was immobilized on a
Streptavidin-coated ELISA plate (Nalge Nunc International,
S. Aoki et al. Amoleculartargetof SQAGs
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS 2137
Wiesbaden, Germany) overnight at 4 °C. Unbound SQAG
was removed by washing three times with 150 lL Tris buf-
fer (100 mm Tris ⁄ HCl, pH 8.0) and plates were blocked
with 200 lL of Tris buffer containing 3% (w ⁄ v) BSA for
1 h. The plates were washed three times with 200 lLof
Tris buffer and then incubated, for 3 h with gentle rotation,
with a T7 phage library composed of cDNA fragment
inserts from D. melanogaster. Unbound phage was removed
by washing three times with 0.1% (v ⁄ v) Tween-20 in Tris
buffer. Bound phage was eluted from each plate by first an
overnight incubation at 4 °C with 200 lL of 1.5 m NaI,
and then four washes with 100 lL of 1.5 m NaI. The super-
natant (total 600 lL) from both steps was collected and
regarded as the eluted fraction. An aliquot (10 lL) was
used to determine the titer of detached phage at each round
of selection. The remainder was amplified by the plate ly-
sate amplification method [15] for anew round of selection
in the same manner as described above.
Following five rounds of selection, 47 plaques were
arbitrarily picked up from LB plates and each dissolved in
phage extraction buffer (20 mm Tris ⁄ HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mm
NaCl, 6 mm MgSO
4
). In order to disrupt the phages, the
extract was heated at 65 °C for 10 min. Phage DNA was
then amplified by PCR, using T7 SelectUP and T7 Select-
DOWN primers (T7Select Cloning kit, Novagen). PCR
products were cloned in the pGEM-T vector (Promega,
Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced using a DNA
Sequencer 4200S (Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). From these
sequence results, the amino acid sequence displayed on the
T7 phage capsid was determined. A homology search
(fasta3) demonstrated that the amino acid sequence of
clone-14 is similar to the neck region of the MCAK.
Some parameters were changed: Database, SwissProt;
Expectation upper value, 50; Matrix, BL50; Number of
alignments, 50.
Comparisons of affinity for SQAG with selected
and unselected T7 phage single clones
The affinity of the candidate clone (positive) for SQAG was
compared with that of an unselected clone (negative). The
negative clone showed low selectivity with biopanning.
Both single clone phages were amplified for liquid lysate
amplification [15] and adjusted to a titer of 1.0 · 10
13
p.f.u.ÆmL
)1
. One hundred microliters of each single phage
suspension (i.e. 10
12
p.f.u.) was applied onto SQAG immo-
bilized plates. Washing and eluting proceeded as described
above for biopanning. The titer of the eluted fraction was
determined.
Construction of recombinant human MCAK
MCAK cDNA was derived from a human peripheral blood
cDNA library by PCR (forward primer: 5¢-ATGGC
CATGGACTCGTCGCT-3¢, reverse primer; 5¢-TCACTG
GGGCCGTTTCTTGC-3¢). The neck and motor domains
of MCAK cDNA (550–1770), conjugated with NdeI and
XhoI restriction sites, were cloned into the pET21a expres-
sion vector (Novagen). EGFP-full length MCAK was made
by the cloning of XhoI-BamHI MCAK cDNA fragment
(forward primer: 5¢-CTCGAGATGGCCATGGACTCGT
CG-3¢, reverse primer: 5¢-GGATCCTCACTGGGGCCGTT
TCTT-3¢) into the pEGFP-C3 vector (BD Biosciences,
Tokyo, Japan).
His
6
-tagged MCAK184 protein preparation
MCAK184 protein was overexpressed, purified for SPR
analysis, and an in vitro MT depolymerization assay was
conducted. Protein expression was performed by transform-
ing the construct into BL21 (DE3)-pLysS (Novagen) and
growing these bacteria in 1 L of Luria–Bertani medium
containing 50 lgÆmL
)1
of kanamycin, 100 lgÆmL
)1
chlo-
ramphenicol. Cells were grown and treated with 1 mm of
isopropyl thio-b-d-galactoside. After 3 h, they were harves-
ted by centrifugation at 3000 g for 15 min. Cell pellets
(3.5 g) were resuspended in 30 mL of ice-cold column bind-
ing buffer (20 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 m NaCl,
35 mm imidazole) and sonicated. Cell lysates were centri-
fuged at 27000 g for 20 min and the soluble protein frac-
tion was collected as a crude extract and loaded onto a
5 mL HisTrap HP column (Amersham Biosciences, Foster
City, CA, USA) of the FPLC system (A
¨
KTA 1 explorer,
Amersham Biosciences) with a flow rate of 1 mL Æmin
)1
.
The column was washed firstly with 100 mL binding buffer
and then washed with 20 mL of buffer (20 mm sodium
phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 m NaCl, 65 mm imidazole). Finally,
MCAK184 was eluted with 100 mL of eluting buffer
(20 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.5 m NaCl, 270 mm
imidazole). For surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis,
the eluted MCAK184 protein was dialyzed against HBS ⁄ EP
buffer [10 mm Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 3 mm EDTA,
0.005% (v ⁄ v) Tween-20]. For the in vitro MT depolymeriza-
tion assay, the eluted MCAK184 protein was dialyzed
against sodium phosphate buffer (50 mm sodium phos-
phate, pH 7.0, 150 mm NaCl).
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis
The binding characteristics of SQAGs anda synthetic
peptide ‘NSRMRVRNATTYNS’ (ANYGEN, Gwang-ju,
Korea), MCAK184, was analyzed using a Biosensor 3000
instrument (BIAcore AB, Uppsala, Sweden) with CM5
research grade sensor chips (BIAcore). The synthetic pep-
tide (332 lgÆmL
)1
, 170 lL) in coupling buffer (10 mm
sodium carbonate ⁄ sodium hydrogen carbonate, pH 8.5)
was injected over a CM5 sensor chip at a 10 lLÆmin
)1
of
flow rate to capture the peptide on the carboxymethyl dex-
tran matrix of the chip by using amine coupling at 25 °C.
The surface was activated by injecting a solution containing
A moleculartargetof SQAGs S. Aoki et al.
2138 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS
0.2 m N-ethyl-N¢-dimethylaminopropyl carbodiimide (EDC)
and 50 mm N-hydroxysuccimide (NHS) for 14 min. The
peptide was injected and the surface was then blocked by
injecting 1 m ethanolamine at pH 8.5 for 14 min. This reac-
tion immobilized about 1500 resonance units (RU) of the
peptide. When MCAK184 (332 lgÆmL
)1
, 170 lL) in coup-
ling buffer (10 mm acetic acid ⁄ sodium acetate, pH 4) was
injected, about 2700 RU were immobilized. Binding analy-
sis of SQAGs was performed in running buffer [10 mm
Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 3 mm EDTA, 0.005% (v ⁄ v)
Tween-20, 8% (v ⁄ v) DMSO] at a flow rate of 20 lLÆmin
)1
at 25 °C. To measure the binding specificity and kinetics
for 14 amino acids (aa), various SQAGs were injected for
120 s [a-SQMG(18:0): 22.8, 91, 364, 728 l m; a-SQMG
(18:1): 0.2, 1.14, 2.28, 5.46 mm; a-SQDG(18:0): 60, 118,
236, 472 lm; b-SQDG(18:0): 7.4, 17.6, 23.5, 29.4 lm]. To
measure MCAK184, various SQAGs were injected for
120 s [a-SQMG(18:0): 91, 364, 728 lm; a-SQMG(18:1):
204, 319, 364 lm; a-SQDG(18:0): 118, 235, 470 lm;
b-SQDG(18:0): 70.6, 76.4, 82.3 lm]. Association and disso-
ciation were each measured for 120 s at 20 lLÆmin
)1
.
biaevaluation 3.1 software (BIAcore) was used to
determine the kinetic parameters.
In vitro microtubule depolymerization assay
A microtubule depolymerization assay using polymerized,
taxol-stabilized tubulin from bovine cytoskeleton (Denver,
CO, USA), was performed as described previously [20–22].
For the assay shown in Fig. 6A, 120 nm MCAK184 in
20 lL of column eluting buffer (250 mm imidazole, pH 7.0,
300 mm KCl, 0.2 mm MgCl
2
, 0.01 mm Mg-ATP, 1 mm
dithiothreitol and 20% glycerol) was mixed with 1500 nm
taxol-stabilized microtubules in 80 lL of BRB80 (80 mm
Pipes, pH 6.8, 1 mm EGTA, and 1 mm MgCl
2
), 12.5 lm
taxol, 1 mm dithiothreitol, and 1.25 mm Mg-ATP ⁄ 1.25 mm
Mg-adenyl-5¢-yl imidodisphosphate incubated at 24 °C for
30 min, and then centrifuged at 223 000 g for 15 min. For
the assay shown in Fig. 6B, there was 2% (final concentra-
tion) DMSO in all samples. Supernatants and pellets were
assayed for the presence of tubulin on Coomassie-stained
SDS ⁄ polyacrylamide gels.
Cell transfection and immunofluorescence
CHO-K1 cells (Japan Health Sciences Foundation, Tokyo,
Japan) were grown in Ham’s F12 medium with 10% (v ⁄ v)
fetal bovine serum. Transfection of pEGFP-C3-full length
MCAK was performed with Lipofectamine
TM
2000 (Invitro-
gen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After transfection, cells were cul-
tured for 24 h and various concentrations of SQAGs were
administered. Cells were exposed for 24 h, fixed with 1%
paraformaldehyde in cold methanol for 10 min, then incu-
bated for 1 h with a mouse anti-(a-tubulin DM1A IgG) Ig
(Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) at 1 : 1000 dilution
and a rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (Chemicon
International, Temecula, CA, USA) at 1 : 100 dilution in
NaCl ⁄ P
i
, 0.1% (v ⁄ v) Triton X-100 and 1% (w ⁄ v) BSA for
1 h. Finally they were washed with NaCl ⁄ P
i
and mounted
in mounting medium [NaCl ⁄ P
i
,4¢,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-
indole (DAPI), 10% (v ⁄ v) glycerol] for analysis under a
microscope (Axioskop 2 plus, Zeiss, Tokyo, Japan). Digital
images were acquired with a cooled CCD camera (Axio-
Cam HRm, ZEISS) controlled by axiovision 3.0 software
(Zeiss).
References
1 Sahara H, Ishikawa M, Takahashi N, Ohtani S, Sato
N, Gasa S, Akino T & Kikuchi K (1997) In vivo
anti-tumour effect of 3¢-sulphonoquinovosyl 1¢-mono-
acylglyceride isolated from sea urchin (Strongylocentro-
tus intermedius) intestine. Br J Cancer 75, 324–332.
2 Matsumoto Y, Sahara H, Fujita T, Shimozawa K,
Takenouchi M, Torigoe T, Hanashima S, Yamazaki T,
Takahashi S, Sugawara F, et al. (2002) An immunosup-
pressive effect by synthetic sulfonolipids deduced from
sulfonoquinovosyl diacylglycerols of sea urchin. Trans-
plantation 74, 261–267.
3 Mizushina Y, Watanabe I, Ohta K, Takemura M,
Sahara H, Takahashi N, Gasa S, Sugawara F, Matsuk-
age A, Yoshida S & Sakaguchi K (1998) Studies on
inhibitors ofmammalian DNA polymerase alpha and
beta: sulfolipids from a pteridophyte, Athyrium niponi-
cum. Biochem Pharmacol 55, 537–541.
4 Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, Takemura M, Sugaw-
ara F, Matsukage A, Yoshida S & Sakaguchi K (1998)
Sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol, KM043, anew potent
inhibitor of eukaryotic DNA polymerases and HIV-
reverse transcriptase type 1 from a marine red alga,
Gigartina tenella. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 46, 684–
686.
5 Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, Takemura M, Sugaw-
ara F, Matsukage A, Yoshida S & Sakaguchi K (1999)
Action ofanewmammalian DNA polymerase inhibi-
tor, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol. Biol Pharm Bull 22,
111–116.
6 Ohta K, Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Yamazaki T,
Saneyoshi M, Sugawara F & Sakaguchi K (2000)
Studies on anovel DNA polymerase inhibitor group,
synthetic sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols: inhibitory action
on cell proliferation. Mutat Res 467, 139–152.
7 Gustafson KR, Cardellina JH 2nd, Fuller RW,
Weislow OS, Kiser RF, Snader KM, Patterson GM &
Boyd MR. (1989) AIDS-antiviral sulfolipids from
cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). J Natl Cancer Inst
81, 1254–1258.
8 Golik J, Dickey JK, Todderud G, Lee D, Alford J,
Huang S, Klohr S, Eustice D, Aruffo A & Agler ML
(1997) Isolation and structure determination of sulfono-
S. Aoki et al. Amoleculartargetof SQAGs
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS 2139
quinovosyl dipalmitoyl glyceride, a P-selectin receptor
inhibitor from the alga Dictyochloris fragrans. J Nat
Prod 60, 387–389.
9 Sahara H, Hanashima S, Yamazaki T, Takahashi S,
Sugawara F, Ohtani S, Ishikawa M, Mizushina Y, Ohta
K, Shimozawa K, et al. (2002) Anti-tumor effect of
chemically synthesized sulfolipids based on sea urchin’s
natural sulfonoquinovosylmonoacylglycerols. Jpn J
Cancer Res 93, 85–92.
10 Hanashima S, Mizushina Y, Ohta K, Yamazaki T,
Sugawara F & Sakaguchi K (2000) Structure-activity
relationship ofanovel group ofmammalian DNA
polymerase inhibitors, synthetic sulfoquinovosylacyl-
glycerols. Jpn J Cancer Res 91, 1073–1083.
11 Mizushina Y, Maeda N, Kawasaki M, Ichikawa H,
Murakami C, Takemura M, Xu X, Sugawara F, Fuku-
mori Y, Yoshida H & Sakaguchi K (2003) Inhibitory
action of emulsified sulfoquinovosyl acylglycerol on
mammalian DNA polymerases. Lipids 38, 1065–1074.
12 Pasqualini R & Ruoslahti E (1996) Organ targeting
in vivo using phage display peptide libraries. Nature 380,
364–366.
13 Smith GP & Petrenko VA (1997) Phage Display. Chem
Rev 97, 391–410.
14 Yamazaki T, Aoki S, Ohta K, Hyuma S, Sakaguchi K
& Sugawara F (2004) Synthesis of an immunosuppres-
sant SQAG9 and determination of the binding peptide
by T7 phage display. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 14, 4343–
4346.
15 Novagen (2000) T7 Select System Manual, TB178. Nov-
agen, Darmstadt, Germany.
16 Danner S & Belasco JG (2001) T7 phage display: a
novel genetic selection system for cloning RNA-binding
proteins from cDNA libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
98, 12954–12959.
17 Desai A, Verma S, Mitchison TJ & Walczak CE (1999)
Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes.
Cell 96, 69–78.
18 Maney T, Wagenbach M & Wordeman L (2001) Mole-
cular dissection of the microtubule depolymerizing activ-
ity ofmitoticcentromere-associated kinesin. J Biol
Chem 276, 34753–34758.
19 Ovechkina Y, Wagenbach M & Wordeman L (2002)
K-loop insertion restores microtubule depolymerizing
activity ofa ‘neckless’ MCAK mutant. J Cell Biol 159 ,
557–562.
20 Wordeman L & Mitchison TJ (1995) Identification and
partial characterization ofmitotic centromere-associated
kinesin, a kinesin-related protein that associates with
centromeres during mitosis. J Cell Biol 128, 95–104.
21 Kim IG, Jun DY, Sohn U & Kim YH (1997) Cloning
and expression of human mitotic centromere-associated
kinesin gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1359, 181–186.
22 Maney T, Hunter AW, Wagenbach M & Wordeman L
(1998) Mitoticcentromere-associatedkinesin is impor-
tant for anaphase chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol
142, 787–801.
23 Hunter AW, Caplow M, Coy DL, Hancock WO, Diez
S, Wordeman L & Howard J (2003) The kinesin-related
protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that
forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule
ends. Mol Cell 11, 445–457.
24 Kasai N, Mizushina Y, Sugawara F & Sakaguchi K
(2002) Three-dimensional structural model analysis of
the binding site of an inhibitor, nervonic acid, of both
DNA polymerase beta and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
J Biochem (Tokyo) 132, 819–828.
25 Kikuchi H, Tsukitani Y, Maeda T, Fujii T, Nakanishi
H, Kobayashi M & Kitagawa I (1982) Marine natural
products. X. Pharmacologically active glycolipids from
the Okinawan marine sponge Phtllosospongia foliascens
(PALLANS). Chem Pharm Bull 30, 3544–3547.
26 Nagai Y & Isono Y (1965) Occurrence of animal sulfoli-
pid in the gametes of sea urchins. Jpn J Exp Med 35,
315–318.
27 Isono Y & Nagai Y (1966) Biochemistry of glycolipids
of sea urchin gametes. I. Separation and characteriza-
tion ofnew type of sulfolipid and sialoglycolipid. Jpn J
Exp Med 36, 461–476.
28 Isono Y, Mohri H & Nagai Y (1967) Effect of egg sul-
pholipid on respiration of sea urchin spermatozoa.
Nature 214, 1336–1338.
29 Kurihara H, Mitani T, Kawabata J & Hatano M (1997)
Inhibitory effect on the a-glucosidase reaction by the
aggregated state of sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol. Biosci
Biotech Biochem 61, 536–538.
A moleculartargetof SQAGs S. Aoki et al.
2140 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 2132–2140 ª 2005 FEBS
. Mammalian mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK)
A new molecular target of sulfoquinovosylacylglycerols novel
antitumor and immunosuppressive agents
Satoko. 684–
686.
5 Ohta K, Mizushina Y, Hirata N, Takemura M, Sugaw-
ara F, Matsukage A, Yoshida S & Sakaguchi K (1999)
Action of a new mammalian DNA polymerase inhibi-
tor,