IsATPbindingresponsibleforinitiatingdrug translocation
by themultidrugtransporter ABCG2?
Christopher A. McDevitt
1
, Emily Crowley
1
, Gemma Hobbs
1
, Kate J. Starr
2
, Ian D. Kerr
2
and Richard
Callaghan
1
1 Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, UK
2 Centre for Biochemistry and Cell Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK
Resistance to chemotherapy presents a continuing and
significant obstacle in the treatment of both solid
tumours and haematological malignancies. One of the
most prevalent primary cellular defence mechanisms
against chemotherapeutic agents isthe membrane-
bound transporter [1]. The defining feature of these
transporters is their ability to interact with a broad
range of structurally unrelated compounds, a property
that has led them to be described as ‘multidrug trans-
porters’ [2–4]. The resistant phenotype is conferred by
the reduction in cytoplasmic concentrations of chemo-
therapeutic drugs to levels below that required for
cytotoxicity. Resistance to chemotherapy has been
attributed to the expression of three ‘multidrug trans-
porters’, all members of theATPbinding cassette
(ABC) superfamily, designated as ABCB1, ABCC1
and ABCG2. Specifically, ABCG2 has been implicated
in clinical multidrug resistance in acute myeloid leu-
kaemia [5–8]. However, although ABCB1 and ABCC1
have been extensively characterized, there are many
unresolved issues relating to the basic biochemistry of
ABCG2.
ABCG2 is a 72 kDa integral membrane protein con-
sisting of six transmembrane helices and an amino
terminal nucleotide binding domain (NBD) [9–11]. It is
described as being a ‘half-transporter’ as the canonical
ABC transporter typically consists of two transmem-
brane domains (TMDs) and two NBDs. Furthermore,
the topological organization of ABCG2 is distinct
from ABCB1 and ABCC1, as NBD is N-terminal to
TMD [9]. To date, there are no high-resolution
structures available for any of the eukaryotic ABC
Keywords
ABC transporter; chemotherapy; membrane
protein; multidrug-resistance; power-stroke
Correspondence
R. Callaghan, Nuffield Department of Clinical
Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe
Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3
9DU, UK
Fax: +44 1865 221 834
Tel: +44 1865 221 110
E-mail: richard.callaghan@ndcls.ox.ac.uk
(Received 28 May 2008, revised 24 June
2008, accepted 27 June 2008)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06578.x
ABCG2 confers resistance to cancer cells by mediating the ATP-dependent
outward efflux of chemotherapeutic compounds. Recent studies have indi-
cated that the protein contains a number of interconnected drug binding
sites. The present investigation examines the coupling of drugbinding to
ATP hydrolysis. Initial drugbinding to the protein requires a high-affinity
interaction with thedrugbinding site, followed by transition and reorien-
tation to the low-affinity state to enable dissociation at the extracellular
face. [
3
H]Daunomycin binding to the ABCG2
R482G
isoform was examined
in the nucleotide-bound and post-hydrolytic conformations. Binding of
[
3
H]daunomycin was displaced byATP analogues, indicating transition to
a low-affinity conformation prior to hydrolysis. The low-affinity state was
observed to be retained immediately post-hydrolysis. Therefore, the dissoci-
ation of phosphate and ⁄ or ADP is likely to be responsiblefor resetting
of the transporter. The data indicate that, like ABCB1 and ABCC1,
the ‘power stroke’ fortranslocation in ABCG2
R482G
is thebinding of
nucleotide.
Abbreviations
ABC, ATPbinding cassette; ATP-c-S, adenosine 5¢-[c-thio]-triphosphate; NBD, nucleotide binding domain; TMD, transmembrane domain;
TNP-ATP, 2¢,3¢-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) adenosine 5¢-triphosphate.
4354 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
transporters, although an 18 A
˚
structure of ABCG2
was obtained using electron microscopy [12]. This
report indicated that soluble purified ABCG2 dis-
played a propensity to form a higher order oligomer, a
tetramer of dimers, which is consistent with the obser-
vations of higher order oligomeric species in cell
membranes [13]. Although the precise molecular
composition remains controversial, there is a growing
weight of evidence favouring a higher order structure
[12–16].
ABCG2 displays distinct, but not exclusive, sub-
strate specificity compared with other multidrug trans-
porters. In particular, the protein confers resistance to
the anticancer drugs mitoxantrone [17], methotrexate
[18] and the camptothecins [19]. Although early cellu-
lar studies failed to generate a consensus forthe sub-
strate profile, the discrepancies were attributed to a
mutation generated during long-term selection in the
presence of anticancer drugs. Selection in mitoxantrone
produced R482G or R482T point mutations that pres-
ent considerably broader substrate selectivity [20,21].
For example, the R482G isoform is a gain-of-function
mutation which mediates the transport of doxorubicin,
daunomycin and rhodamine 123, whereas it has a loss
of function with respect to methotrexate transport.
Recent investigations have demonstrated that
ABCG2
R482G
, like other multidrug transporters, con-
tains more than one drugbinding site. In addition, the
binding sites are linked by both negative and positive
heterotropic allostery. In a departure from the drug–
protein interactions with ABCB1, the R482G isoform
also contains multiple sites of interaction for a single
drug (daunomycin), which can manifest as homotropic
allostery [22]. The latter has been observed for the
bacterial half-transporter LmrA, but not for any
eukaryotic ABC protein [23].
The translocation of drugs across the plasma mem-
brane requires that thedrugbinding event(s) in TMD
is intrinsically coupled to the catalytic cycle within
NBDs. The best evidence for an interaction between
the two domains isthe ability of numerous substrates
and modulators of ABCG2 (and the R482G isoform)
to stimulate the rate of ATP hydrolysis [21,24,25],
albeit to a lesser degree than that commonly encoun-
tered with ABCB1. Thetranslocation event requires
that thedrugbinding sites switch from the initial
high-affinity, inward-facing configuration to an
outward-facing, low-affinity configuration to facilitate
dissociation [26]. Originally, the impetus forthe switch
in binding site affinity and orientation was thought to
be the energy produced by nucleotide hydrolysis. In
the case of ABCB1, this was revised through the obser-
vations that nucleotide binding in the absence of
hydrolysis could cause the conformational alteration
(reviewed in [27,28]). The low-affinity conformation of
drug binding sites in ABC multidrug efflux pumps is
assumed to correspond to the outward-facing confor-
mation. The energy produced bythe hydrolysis of
ATP is harnessed forthe resetting of the transporter
to the initial high-affinity, inward-facing configuration.
Similar results were also obtained for ABCC1. Thus,
the eukaryotic multidrug transporters are thought to
mediate drugtranslocation through a ‘power stroke’
which is obtained bythebinding of nucleotide.
The focus of the present investigation was to ascer-
tain whether thebinding of nucleotide to ABCG2
R482G
was the power stroke required to switch the configura-
tion of thedrugbinding site(s). This hypothesis was
examined using a direct measure of drugbinding to
the protein, which was trapped in both pre- and post-
nucleotide hydrolytic conformations.
Results
Characteristics of drugbinding to ABCG2
R482G
-
containing membranes
The expression of ABCG2
R482G
has previously been
established in High-5 insect cells using recombinant
baculovirus [22]. [
3
H]Daunomycin (300–350 nm) bound
to the membranes with a total binding capacity of
107 ± 13 pmolÆmg
)1
, which was significantly reduced
following the addition of a large molar excess of doxoru-
bicin (30 lm). The remaining [
3
H]daunomycin associ-
ated with the membranes corresponded to nonspecific
binding at sites other than the ABCG2
R482G
protein.
This fraction corresponded to 37 ± 8 pmolÆmg
)1
, and
therefore the specific binding component in the mem-
branes was 70 pmolÆmg
)1
. The dissociation constant for
[
3
H]daunomycin binding to ABCG2
R482G
has previ-
ously been estimated as 98 nm [22], and all subsequent
binding assays in this study were conducted with 300–
350 nm of the radioligand. There was no detectable dis-
placement of [
3
H]daunomycin binding to membranes
that did not express ABCG2
R482G
(data not shown).
A heterologous drug displacement assay was under-
taken with ABCG2
R482G
-containing membranes to
characterize the potency of the drug–protein interaction.
Figure 1A demonstrates that doxorubicin is able to dis-
place 90 ± 2% of the specific binding component of
[
3
H]daunomycin. Moreover, the potency to displace
[
3
H]daunomycin bindingis IC
50
= 1.73 ± 0.51 mm
(n = 9), which is in good agreement with the value
previously described [22]. Thus, High-5 insect cell
membranes provide a specific method to examine the
drug binding characteristics of ABCG2
R482G
.
C. A. McDevitt et al. The power stroke in ABCG2
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4355
Characteristics of nucleotide binding to purified
ABCG2
R482G
Photolabelling of ABCG2
R482G
by [a
32
P]azido-ATP was
used to characterize the interaction of nucleotides with
the transporter. As shown in Fig. 2A, [a
32
P]azido-ATP
binds to ABCG2
R482G
in a dose-dependent manner.
Unfortunately, commercial preparations of the
photo-active nucleotide do not attain sufficiently high
concentrations to enable complete saturation of binding.
However, thebinding isotherm in Fig. 2A provides an
estimate of thebinding affinity for [a
32
P]azido-ATP as
K
D
= 201 ± 80 lm. This affinity is similar to the value
obtained forATPbinding to ABCB1 [29]. The ability of
nucleotides to displace bindingis shown in Fig. 2B, with
values normalized to the amount bound in the absence
of added nucleotide. Neither ADP nor AMP altered the
photolabelling of [a
32
P]azido-ATP bound, whereas the
ATP analogues adenosine 5¢-[c-thio]-triphosphate
(ATP-c-S) and 2¢,3¢-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) adenosine
Fig. 1. Heterologous displacement of [
3
H]daunomycin binding to
ABCG2
R482G
by doxorubicin. (A) ABCG2
R482G
-containing insect cell
membranes (20 lg) were incubated with [
3
H]daunomycin (300 nM)
in the presence or absence of varying concentrations of doxorubicin
(1 n
M to 300 lM). Incubations were performed at 20 °C for a period
of 120 min to ensure that equilibrium had been reached. Unbound
[
3
H]daunomycin was removed using a rapid filtration assay, and the
amount of bound radioligand was determined by liquid scintillation
counting. Values refer to the mean ± SEM of at least three inde-
pendent membrane preparations, and the dose–response curve
was fitted using nonlinear least-squares regression. (B) A series of
nucleotides was examined for their propensity to displace the bind-
ing of [
3
H]daunomycin (300 nM) to ABCG2
R482G
containing High-5
insect cell membranes (20 lg). The radioligand was incubated with
the ABCG2
R482G
-containing membranes in the presence of 10 mM
nucleotide. The only exception was theATP analogue TNP-ATP,
which was used at a concentration of 0.6 m
M. The amount of
[
3
H]daunomycin bound to the membranes in the absence of nucleo-
tide was assigned a value of unity, and all other data were
expressed as a fraction of this. Values correspond to the mean ±
SEM of three independent membrane preparations.
Fig. 2. Thebinding of nucleotides and analogues to ABCG2
R482G
.
(A) Purified ABCG2
R482G
(0.25 lg) was photolabelled with
[a
32
P]azido-ATP (3–300 lM) as described in Materials and methods.
Labelled protein was visualized and quantified by autoradiography
of SDS-PAGE analysis. The amount of bound protein was plotted
as a function of nucleotide concentration, and the data were fitted
with the Langmuir binding isotherm using nonlinear least-squares
regression. (B) Photoaffinity labelling of purified ABCG2
R482G
(0.25 lg) was undertaken using a fixed concentration (30 lM)of
[a
32
P]azido-ATP in the presence or absence of ADP (10 mM), AMP
(10 m
M), ATP-c-S (10 mM) or TNP-ATP (1 mM). The intensity of
labelling in the absence of excess nucleotide was assigned a value
of unity.
The power stroke in ABCG2 C. A. McDevitt et al.
4356 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
5¢-triphosphate (TNP-ATP) produced considerable
reductions in the amount of bound nucleotide.
Screening nucleotides for propensity to modify
drug binding to ABCG2
R482G
ABCG2
R482G
-containing membranes were incubated
with [
3
H]daunomycin and a series of adenine nucleo-
tides and three analogues to assess interactions. A
fixed concentration of nucleotide (10 mm) was used,
apart from TNP-ATP which was administered at
0.6 mm because of its higher potency. Figure 1B dem-
onstrates the ability of the nucleotides to reduce the
fraction of [
3
H]daunomycin bound to ABCG2
R482G
.In
the presence of AMP, thebinding of [
3
H]daunomycin
remained at 93 ± 4% (n =8, P > 0.05) of that
obtained in the untreated control, and the addition of
ADP produced a marginal decrease to 80 ± 5%
(n =4, P > 0.05). The addition of ATP produced a
statistically significant decrease (n =4, P < 0.05) in
the amount of [
3
H]daunomycin bound to a value of
59 ± 9%. The nonhydrolysable nucleotide, ATP-c-S,
produced an even greater decrease to 59 ± 4%
(n =8, P < 0.05). Despite the use of a considerably
lower concentration (0.6 mm), the fluorescent and
slowly hydrolysable analogue TNP-ATP reduced the
binding to 35 ± 4% (n =6,P < 0.05).
Binding of [
3
H]daunomycin to ABCG2
R482G
in a
pre-hydrolysis configuration
ATP, and its nonhydrolysable analogues ATP-c-S and
TNP-ATP, reduced the degree of [
3
H]daunomycin
binding to ABCG2
R482G
, thus warranting further
examination of the effect of these nucleotide
analogues. Figure 3 shows the effects of a range of
ATP-c-S concentrations on the interaction of [
3
H]dau-
nomycin with ABCG2
R482G
. At the highest concentra-
tion of nucleotide, only approximately 20% of the
radioligand was bound to the protein. The extent of
binding was fitted with a dose–response curve, which
generated a potency of IC
50
= 11.8 ± 1.6 mm for
ATP-c-S. Similar analysis was undertaken for the
slowly hydrolysable analogue TNP-ATP, as shown in
Fig. 4. At a concentration of 2 mm, < 10% of the ini-
tial binding of [
3
H]daunomycin was observed. The
potency of TNP-ATP to displace [
3
H]daunomycin
binding was characterized by IC
50
= 0.27 ± 0.02 mm,
which is 44-fold greater than that of ATP-c-S.
Both TNP-ATP and ATP-c-S cause a decrease in
the extent of [
3
H]daunomycin binding to ABCG2
R482G
.
Given the distinct sites forbinding of nucleotides and
drugs to the protein, this decrease occurs via a nega-
tive allosteric mechanism. The addition of either nucle-
otide analogue will effectively trap the protein in a
conformation closely resembling the pre-hydrolytic
state. The decrease in capacity fordrugbinding reflects
a lower affinity interaction between [
3
H]daunomycin
and the protein immediately prior to ATP hydrolysis.
Fig. 3. Heterologous displacement of [
3
H]daunomycin binding to
ABCG2
R482G
by the nonhydrolysable nucleotide ATP-c-S. The effect
of the nonhydrolysable ATP analogue ATP-c-S (100 l
M to 20 mM)
on [
3
H]daunomycin (300 nM) binding to ABCG2
R482G
was examined
using High-5 cell membranes (20 lg). Incubations were undertaken
at 20 °C for a period of 120 min, and the membrane-bound radioli-
gand was harvested by vacuum filtration through a manifold. The
general dose–response relationship was fitted to the data
(mean ± SEM, n ‡ 3) using nonlinear least-squares regression.
Fig. 4. Heterologous displacement of [
3
H]daunomycin binding to
ABCG2
R482G
by TNP-ATP. [
3
H]Daunomycin (300 nM) was incubated
with ABCG2
R482G
-containing High-5 insect cell membranes (20 lg)
in the presence or absence of varying concentrations of the fluores-
cent ATP analogue TNP-ATP (10 l
M to 1.2 mM). Incubations were
performed at 20 °C for a period of 120 min to ensure that equilib-
rium had been reached. Unbound [
3
H]daunomycin was removed
using a rapid filtration assay, and the amount of bound radioligand
was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Values refer to the
mean ± SEM of at least three independent membrane prepara-
tions, and the dose–response curve was fitted using nonlinear
least-squares regression.
C. A. McDevitt et al. The power stroke in ABCG2
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4357
Binding of [
3
H]daunomycin to ABCG2
R482G
in a
post-hydrolysis configuration
Given that the [
3
H]daunomycin binding site is
switched to a low-affinity configuration on nucleotide
binding, what isthe consequence of ATP hydrolysis
for thedrugbinding sites? To address this issue,
ABCG2
R482G
was trapped immediately post-hydroly-
sis using sodium orthovanadate [21]. The metal oxo-
anion vanadate serves as a transition state mimic,
exploiting its chemical similarity to phosphate. Thus,
ATP and vanadate generate an ADP-vanadate struc-
ture mimicking the transition state forthe hydrolysis
of the c-phosphate of ATP [30]. Figure 5 demon-
strates the effect of pre-incubation of ABCG2
R482G
-
containing membranes with 100 lm NaVO
3
and a
series of ATP concentrations. The data show a 90%
decrease in the amount of [
3
H]daunomycin bound to
the membranes, indicating that the capacity for sub-
strate interaction is considerably reduced. The
potency for vanadate trapping to reduce [
3
H]dauno-
mycin binding to ABCG2
R482G
was 21.3 ± 3.3 mm
of nucleotide. Therefore, the data demonstrate that
ABCG2
R482G
remains in a conformation that contains
a low-affinity binding site for [
3
H]daunomycin imme-
diately post-nucleotide hydrolysis.
Discussion
A precise molecular mechanism for substrate translo-
cation by any ABC protein remains unresolved,
despite considerable investigation using varied
approaches and recent high-resolution X-ray crystal
structures. Investigations with multidrug transporters,
involved in conferring drug resistance in cancer cells,
have provided the most information. For two of the
proteins, ABCB1 and ABCC1, it has been demon-
strated that thebinding of nucleotide imparts marked
and essential conformational changes within TMDs.
The present study provides the first evidence that nucle-
otide binding per se also plays a role in the initiation of
the drugtranslocation process for ABCG2, despite its
structurally dissimilar architecture to the aforemen-
tioned transporters.
A radioligand binding approach was used in the
investigations and has previously been evaluated for use
with the ABCG2
R482G
isoform [22]. The ‘gain-of-func-
tion’ mutation confers resistance to the anthracycline
daunomycin by transporting it out of the cytoplasm
[31]. A previous study has indicated that there are two
allosterically coupled binding sites for daunomycin,
although it is unclear whether the coupling is between
the two monomers in a transporter, or between distinct
dimeric units [22]. Measurement of [
3
H]daunomycin
binding provides a useful insight into the pharmacology
of the ABCG2
R482G
isoform, as thebinding site is in
communication with those for different drug substrates.
The initial nucleotide screen revealed that several
nucleotide species were capable of modulating drug
binding, thereby reaffirming the interdomain communi-
cation reported for ABCG2. However, despite using
relatively high concentrations, neither AMP nor ADP
was capable of altering the drug–ABCG2 interaction.
In the case of the monophosphate AMP, this was
entirely expected as this nucleotide plays no role in the
catalytic process of ABCG2, and was therefore a
control for specificity of the interaction. The lack of
effect of the diphosphate nucleotide indicates that,
following inorganic phosphate release, the ADP-bound
ABCG2
R482G
isoform adopts a conformation capable
of supporting thebinding of [
3
H]daunomycin.
The triphosphate nucleotide ATP caused a consider-
able decrease in the ability of ABCG2
R482G
to bind
[
3
H]daunomycin. This decrease in drugbinding was
also observed in the presence of theATP analogues
ATP-c-S (nonhydrolysable) and TNP-ATP (slowly
hydrolysable), although the magnitude of effect with
the latter was more pronounced. TheATP analogues
were preferred for subsequent investigations, as ATP
is an inherently unstable or reactive compound in
aqueous solutions, even at the reduced temperatures
employed in radioligand binding assays. Detailed
investigation revealed that [
3
H]daunomycin binding by
ABCG2
R482G
was essentially abrogated in the presence
Fig. 5. Thebinding of [
3
H]daunomycin to vanadate-trapped
ABCG2
R482G
. ABCG2
R482G
was trapped in the presence of sodium
orthovanadate (100 l
M) and a series of ATP concentrations (100 lM
to 300 mM)at37°C for 30 min. The vanadate-trapped protein was
then incubated with [
3
H]daunomycin (300 nM) for 120 min at 20 °C.
Bound and free radioligand were separated using a rapid filtration
assay, and the former was detected using liquid scintillation count-
ing. Values correspond to the mean ± SEM of at least three inde-
pendent membrane preparations, and the dose–response curve
was fitted using nonlinear least-squares regression.
The power stroke in ABCG2 C. A. McDevitt et al.
4358 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
of sufficient ATP-c-S or TNP-ATP. Thus, the ATP-
loaded conformation of ABCG2
R482G
([E]Æ[ATP],
where ‘E’ refers to ABCG2
R482G
) facilitates a negative
heterotropic allosteric effect of NBDs on TMDs. This
finding with ABCG2
R482G
is entirely consistent with
the observation forthe interaction of [
3
H]vinblastine
with ABCB1 and for [
3
H]estrone-sulfate binding to
ABCC1 [32,33]. Such a decrease in the affinity or
capacity of drugbinding to ABCG2
R482G
is likely to
represent the outward-facing conformation of the
transporter, as the presence of an inward-facing drug
binding site with low affinity would preclude an effi-
cient rate of translocation. A possible alternative
explanation is that, although thebinding of ATP
reduces thedrugbinding site to low affinity, it does
not generate an outward-facing conformation. How-
ever, this would require that thedrugbinding site
adopts an occluded inward-facing conformation to
prevent dissociation, and that reorientation occurs fol-
lowing harnessing of the energy from ATP hydrolysis.
If one of the initial events in the nucleotide catalytic
cycle isresponsibleforthe decrease in affinity (and pre-
sumably reorientation) of drugbinding sites, what role
do subsequent steps play in thetranslocation process?
As mentioned above, the [E]Æ[ADP] conformation
appears to have returned to high affinity, and the inter-
vening steps in the catalytic cycle are responsible for
the restoration of binding capacity. In order to main-
tain ABCG2
R482G
in a stable post-hydrolysis conforma-
tion, we employed the vanadate trapping procedure.
The data revealed that vanadate-trapped ABCG2
R482G
protein ([E]Æ[ADP]Æ[Vi]) remained in a low-affinity
[
3
H]daunomycin binding conformation. By inference,
therefore, the step in the catalytic cycle corresponding
to the release of inorganic phosphate ([P
i
]) is likely to
correspond to the restoration of a high-affinity
conformation forthe transporter, which is supported
by the restoration of high-affinity binding in the ADP-
bound conformation. That this step of the catalytic
cycle is associated with the greatest free energy change
also makes it ideal forthe mediation of drug binding
site reorientation, although thebinding data cannot
unequivocally inform on the orientation of the sites,
only their affinity for interaction with drugs.
The data presented here suggest that the ABC-
G2
R482G
isoform undergoes the following sequence of
conformational transitions:
½E
H
$½E
L
Á½ATP$½E
L
Á½ADP½P
i
$½E
H
Á½ADP$½E
H
where [E]
H
and [E]
L
correspond to the high- and low-
affinity conformations of ABCG2
R482G
, respectively.
The sequence, based on the measurement of drug–
protein binding, indicates that thebinding of ATP
per se isthe ‘power stroke’ fordrug translocation, and
that energy obtained from the hydrolysis process is
used to reset the transporter. That ATPbinding is
responsible forthe shift in binding affinity from high to
low has now been demonstrated for all three eukaryotic
multidrug efflux proteins in the ABC family.
Materials and methods
Materials
[
3
H]Daunomycin (0.185 TBq Ci Æ mmol
)1
) was purchased
from Perkin Elmer LAS (Beaconsfield, UK) and Ready
Protein
+
scintillation fluid was obtained from Beckman
Coulter (High Wycombe, UK). Doxorubicin, sodium ortho-
vanadate, ATP, ADP, AMP, ATP-c-S and TNP-ATP were
purchased from Sigma (Poole, UK). GF ⁄ F filters were
purchased from VWR International (Lutterworth, UK).
Insect Xpress medium was obtained from Cambrex (Read-
ing, UK) and Ex-cell 405 medium from JRH Biosciences
(Andover, UK).
Insect cell culture and membrane preparation
The Trichoplusia ni (High-5) cell line was routinely used for
the expression of ABCG2
R482G
and maintained in shaking
suspension cultures, as described previously [22]. High-5
cells at a density of approximately 3 · 10
6
cellsÆmL
)1
were
infected with recombinant baculovirus (approximately
1 · 10
8
plaque-forming unitsÆmL
)1
) at a multiplicity of
infection of five. After 1 h of incubation with virus, the
cells were diluted to a density of 1.5 · 10
6
cellsÆmL
)1
and
maintained in suspension for 3 days before harvesting by
centrifugation (2000 g, 10 min).
Crude membrane preparations were isolated as described
previously [34], with the exception that buffers contained
20 mm Mops, pH 7.4, 200 mm NaCl and 0.25 m sucrose.
Briefly, cells were ruptured with four rounds of nitrogen
cavitation using 6500–10 000 kPa at 4 °C, with a 20 min
incubation between rounds. Cell debris was removed by
centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 min. Crude membranes were
isolated by ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g for 60 min at
4 °C. Membranes were resuspended at protein concentra-
tions of approximately 50 mgÆmL
)1
in isolation buffer
(0.25 m sucrose, 20 mm Mops, pH 7.4, containing a prote-
ase inhibitor cocktail) and stored at )80 °C.
Radioligand binding assay
Radiolabelled drugbinding assays were based on a previ-
ously published technique used to investigate ABCB1 [35].
Membranes (20 lg) were incubated with a radiolabel,
C. A. McDevitt et al. The power stroke in ABCG2
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4359
[
3
H]daunomycin, in a total volume of 100 lL in polypro-
pylene test tubes for 120 min to ensure attainment of bind-
ing equilibrium. The membranes, [
3
H]daunomycin and any
other drugs were incubated in hypotonic binding buffer,
comprising 50 mm Tris ⁄ HCl, pH 7.4. Hypotonic buffer was
used in binding assays to ensure no intraliposomal drug
accumulation. Nonspecific binding to the filters or the lipid
component of membranes was defined as the amount of
[
3
H]daunomycin bound in the presence of a large molar
excess (30 lm) of doxorubicin. Drugs were added from con-
centrated stocks in dimethylsulfoxide and the solvent con-
centration was maintained at < 1% (v ⁄ v). Actual
concentrations of [
3
H]daunomycin added to the tubes were
determined by liquid scintillation counting. Unbound ligand
was separated from bound ligand through porous glass-
fibre filters (GF ⁄ F) using rapid vacuum filtration on a
48-well manifold. The GF ⁄ F filters were pre-soaked in
wash buffer supplemented with 0.1% (w ⁄ v) BSA for
10 min. Samples on the filters were rinsed twice with 10 mL
of ice-cold wash buffer (50 mm Tris ⁄ HCl, pH 7.4, 20 mm
MgSO
4
). [
3
H]Daunomycin bound to the filters was mea-
sured by liquid scintillation counting using Ready Protein
+
scintillation fluid.
Heterologous displacement assays used ABCG2
R482G
-
containing crude membranes incubated with a single con-
centration of [
3
H]daunomycin (300–350 nm)at20°C for
120 min. Doxorubicin was added over the concentration
range 1 nm to 300 lm, obtained from the serial dilution of
a concentrated stock in dimethylsulfoxide. All nucleotides
and analogues were added from concentrated stocks in buf-
fer containing 5 mm MgCl
2
, 100 mm Mops at pH 6.8. The
NaVO
3
stock solution (100 mm) was treated as described
previously by Goodno [36] to remove polymeric species.
Membranes were incubated with 100 lm NaVO
3
in the
presence of varying concentrations of MgATP (100 lm to
300 mm) in ATPase buffer (150 mm NH
4
Cl, 50 mm
Tris ⁄ HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mm MgSO
4
). The vanadate trapping
of ABCG2
R482G
was achieved at 37 °C for 30 min prior to
the binding assay, according to a previously published
procedure [21].
The amount of [
3
H]daunomycin bound at each concen-
tration of heterologous drug or nucleotide was expressed as
a fraction of that obtained with radiolabel alone. The
fraction bound was plotted as a function of added drug
concentration, and nonlinear regression of the general
dose–response relation (Eqn 1) was used to ascertain the
potency (IC
50
) and degree of displacement (F
D
).
Binding of [a
32
P]azido-ATP to purified
ABCG2
R482G
ABCG2
R482G
was purified using immobilized metal affinity,
anion exchange and gel filtration chromatography; full and
extensive details have been described previously [22]. Binding
of nucleotide to ABCG2
R482G
was determined using photo-
affinity labelling with [a
32
P]azido-ATP. Purified protein
(0.25 lg) was incubated with [a
32
P]azido-ATP (3–300 lm)in
the dark for 20 min in ATPase buffer (150 mm NH
4
Cl,
50 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mm MgSO
4
, 0.02% NaN
3
)at4°C. At
this temperature, ABCG2 does not generate measurable ATP
hydrolysis. Samples were then irradiated with UV light
(k = 265 nm, 100 W, 5 cm) for 8 min, and the samples were
resolved by electrophoresis using 10% polyacrylamide gels.
The gels were dried, and photolabelled protein was detected
by autoradiography. Where displacement of nucleotide bind-
ing was examined, the [a
32
P]azido-ATP concentration was
fixed at 30 lm. Relative labelling intensities were determined
using densitometric analysis of autoradiograms.
Statistical analyses
Heterologous displacement assays were analysed using the
dose–response relationship shown below:
B ¼ B
min
þ
ðB
max
À B
min
Þ
1 þ 10
½ðlogIC
50
ÀLÞ
n
ð1Þ
where B isthe maximal [
3
H]daunomycin binding, B
max
is
the maximal binding, B
min
is the minimum binding, IC
50
is
the concentration of drug that leads to half-maximal bind-
ing of radiolabel (nm), n isthe Hill slope factor and L is
log
10
[ligand concentration (m)]. Thebinding capacities are
expressed as a fraction of the total obtained in the absence
of drug or nucleotide.
Equation (1) was fitted to the displacement data by non-
linear least-squares regression using the graphpad prism
4.0 program. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM
of multiple independent observations, and P < 0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant.
Acknowledgements
The work undertaken in this study was supported by
Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council
project grants awarded to RC. The authors would like
to thank TMW and DCS for critical assessment of all
aspects of the project.
References
1 Mellor HR & Callaghan R (2008) Resistance to chemo-
therapy in cancer: a complex and integrated cellular
response. Pharmacology 81, 275–300.
2 Ambudkar SV, Dey S, Hrycyna CA, Ramachandra M,
Pastan I & Gottesman MM (1999) Biochemical, cellu-
lar, and pharmacological aspects of themultidrug trans-
porter. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 39, 361–398.
3 Leonard GD, Fojo T & Bates SE (2003) The role of
ABC transporters in clinical practice. Oncologist 8, 411–
424.
The power stroke in ABCG2 C. A. McDevitt et al.
4360 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
4 Modok S, Mellor HR & Callaghan R (2006) Modula-
tion of multidrug resistance efflux pump activity to
overcome chemoresistance in cancer. Curr Opin Phar-
macol 6, 350–354.
5 Ross DD, Karp JE, Chen TT & Doyle LA (2000) Expres-
sion of breast cancer resistance protein in blast cells from
patients with acute leukemia. Blood 96, 365–368.
6 Sargent JM, Williamson CJ, Maliepaard M, Elgie AW,
Scheper RJ & Taylor CG (2001) Breast cancer resis-
tance protein expression and resistance to daunorubicin
in blast cells from patients with acute myeloid leukae-
mia. Br J Haematol 115, 257–262.
7 Steinbach D, Sell W, Voigt A, Hermann J, Zintl F &
Sauerbrey A (2002) BCRP gene expression is associated
with a poor response to remission induction therapy in
childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 16, 1443–
1447.
8 van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Sonneveld P & Pieters R
(2000) The prognostic significance of membrane trans-
port-associated multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins in
leukemia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 38, 94–110.
9 Allikmets R, Schriml LM, Hutchinson A, Romano-
Spica V & Dean M (1998) A human placenta-specific
ATP-binding cassette gene (ABCP) on chromosome
4q22 that is involved in multidrug resistance. Cancer
Res 58, 5337–5339.
10 Doyle LA, Yang W, Abruzzo LV, Krogmann T, Gao
Y, Rishi AK & Ross DD (1998) A multidrug resistance
transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 15665–15670.
11 Miyake K, Mickley L, Litman T, Zhan Z, Robey R,
Cristensen B, Brangi M, Greenberger L, Dean M, Fojo T
et al. (1999) Molecular cloning of cDNAs which are
highly overexpressed in mitoxantrone-resistant cells:
demonstration of homology to ABC transport genes.
Cancer Res 59, 8–13.
12 McDevitt CA, Collins RF, Conway M, Modok S,
Storm J, Kerr ID, Ford RC & Callaghan R (2006) Puri-
fication and 3D structural analysis of oligomeric human
multidrug transporter ABCG2. Structure 14, 1623–1632.
13 Xu J, Liu Y, Yang Y, Bates S & Zhang JT (2004)
Characterization of oligomeric human half-ABC trans-
porter ATP-binding cassette G2. J Biol Chem 279,
19781–19789.
14 Bhatia A, Schafer HJ & Hrycyna CA (2005) Oligomeri-
zation of the human ABC transporter ABCG2: evalua-
tion of the native protein and chimeric dimers.
Biochemistry 44, 10893–10904.
15 Kage K, Tsukahara S, Sugiyama T, Asada S, Ishikawa E,
Tsuruo T & Sugimoto Y (2002) Dominant-negative inhi-
bition of breast cancer resistance protein as drug efflux
pump through the inhibition of S–S dependent homodi-
merization. Int J Cancer 97, 626–630.
16 Liu Y, Yang Y, Qi J, Peng H & Zhang J T (2008)
Effect of cysteine mutagenesis on the function and
disulfide bond formation of human ABCG2. J Pharma-
col Exp Ther 326, 33–40.
17 Nakagawa M, Schneider E, Dixon KH, Horton J,
Kelley K, Morrow C & Cowan K H (1992) Reduced
intracellular drug accumulation in the absence of P-gly-
coprotein (mdr1) overexpression in mitoxantrone-resis-
tant human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 52,
6175–6181.
18 Chen ZS, Robey RW, Belinsky MG, Shchaveleva I,
Ren XQ, Sugimoto Y, Ross DD, Bates SE & Kruh GD
(2003) Transport of methotrexate, methotrexate poly-
glutamates, and 17beta-estradiol 17-(beta-d-glucuro-
nide) by ABCG2: effects of acquired mutations at
R482 on methotrexate transport. Cancer Res 63 , 4048–
4054.
19 Robey RW, Honjo Y, van de Laar A, Miyake K,
Regis JT, Litman T & Bates SE (2001) A functional assay
for detection of the mitoxantrone resistance protein,
MXR (ABCG2). Biochim Biophys Acta 1512, 171–182.
20 Mitomo H, Kato R, Ito A, Kasamatsu S, Ikegami Y,
Kii I, Kudo A, Kobatake E, Sumino Y & Ishikawa T
(2003) A functional study on polymorphism of the
ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2: critical role
of arginine-482 in methotrexate transport. Biochem J
373, 767–774.
21 Ozvegy C, Varadi A & Sarkadi B (2002) Characteriza-
tion of drug transport, ATP hydrolysis, and nucleotide
trapping bythe human ABCG2 multidrug transporter.
Modulation of substrate specificity by a point mutation.
J Biol Chem 277, 47980–47990.
22 Clark R, Kerr ID & Callaghan R (2006) Multiple drug
binding sites on the R482G isoform of the ABCG2
transporter. Br J Pharmacol 149, 506–515.
23 van Veen HW, Margolles A, Muller M, Higgins CF &
Konings WN (2000) The homodimeric ATP-binding
cassette transporter LmrA mediates multidrug transport
by an alternating two-site (two-cylinder engine) mecha-
nism. EMBO J 19, 2503–2514.
24 Ozvegy C, Litman T, Szakacs G, Nagy Z, Bates S,
Varadi A & Sarkadi B (2001) Functional characteriza-
tion of the human multidrug transporter, ABCG2,
expressed in insect cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun
285, 111–117.
25 Pozza A, Perez-Victoria JM, Sardo A, Ahmed-Belka-
cem A & Di Pietro A (2006) Purification of breast can-
cer resistance protein ABCG2 and role of arginine-482.
Cell Mol Life Sci 63, 1912–1922.
26 Krupka RM (1993) Coupling mechanisms in ATP-
driven pumps. Biochim Biophys Acta 1183, 114–122.
27 Callaghan R, Ford RC & Kerr ID (2006) The translo-
cation mechanism of P-glycoprotein. FEBS Lett 580,
1056–1063.
28 Higgins CF & Linton KJ (2004) TheATP switch
model for ABC transporters. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11,
918–926.
C. A. McDevitt et al. The power stroke in ABCG2
FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS 4361
29 Delannoy S, Urbatsch IL, Tombline G, Senior AE &
Vogel PD (2005) Nucleotide binding to the multidrug
resistance P-glycoprotein as studied by ESR spectros-
copy. Biochemistry 44, 14010–14019.
30 Davies DR & Hol WG (2004) The power of vanadate
in crystallographic investigations of phosphoryl transfer
enzymes. FEBS Lett 577, 315–321.
31 Honjo Y, Hrycyna CA, Yan QW, Medina-Perez WY,
Robey RW, van de Laar A, Litman T, Dean M &
Bates SE (2001) Acquired mutations in the
MXR ⁄ BCRP ⁄ ABCP gene alter substrate specificity in
MXR ⁄ BCRP ⁄ ABCP-overexpressing cells. Cancer Res
61, 6635–6639.
32 Martin C, Higgins CF & Callaghan R (2001) The
vinblastine binding site adopts high- and low-affinity
conformations during a transport cycle of P-glycopro-
tein. Biochemistry 40, 15733–15742.
33 Rothnie A, Callaghan R, Deeley RG & Cole SP (2006)
Role of GSH in estrone sulphate binding and transloca-
tion bythemultidrug resistance protein 1
(MRP1 ⁄ ABCC1). J Biol Chem 281, 13906–13914.
34 Taylor AM, Storm J, Soceneantu L, Linton KJ, Gabriel
M, Martin C, Woodhouse J, Blott E, Higgins CF &
Callaghan R (2001) Detailed characterization of cyste-
ine-less P-glycoprotein reveals subtle pharmacological
differences in function from wild-type protein. Br J
Pharmacol 134, 1609–1618.
35 Martin C, Berridge G, Mistry P, Higgins C, Charlton P
& Callaghan R (1999) The molecular interaction of the
high affinity reversal agent XR9576 with P-glycoprotein.
Br J Pharmacol 128, 403–411.
36 Goodno CC (1982) Myosin active site trapping with
vanadate ion. Methods Enzymol 85, 116–123.
The power stroke in ABCG2 C. A. McDevitt et al.
4362 FEBS Journal 275 (2008) 4354–4362 ª 2008 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2008 FEBS
. Is ATP binding responsible for initiating drug translocation
by the multidrug transporter ABCG2?
Christopher A. McDevitt
1
, Emily. that the binding of ATP
per se is the ‘power stroke’ for drug translocation, and
that energy obtained from the hydrolysis process is
used to reset the transporter.