cover letter format sample
Employment agreement in letter format (long form)
... information as the Employer may from time to time designate as being confidential to the Employer. Confidential information will not include information that is in the public domain, or information ... Confidential information of the Employer includes any and all trade secrets, confidential, private or secret information of the Employer including without limitation (i) business and financial information ... of the Employer’s confidential information is extremely important to the success of the Employer and, consequently, any breach of the confidentiality of information policies or procedures which...
Ngày tải lên: 16/10/2013, 10:15
Employment agreement in letter format (short form)
... EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT IN LETTER FORMAT (SHORT FORM) [DATE, ex. Wednesday, June 11, 1998] [NAME, COMPANY AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYEE, ... ex. July 1, 1998]. As you know, you will be employed as [TITLE DESCRIPTION OF EMPLOYMENT]. This letter will set out the terms and conditions of your employment. 1. Scope of Work: As [TITLE DESCRIPTION...
Ngày tải lên: 18/10/2013, 16:15
The Ad Response - Resume Cover Letter
... your letter or for considering you as a candidate. The following sample closings will help you out in a variety of jobhunting situations, as will the many examples contained in the sample letters ... promised. So do. You ’ll find examples of this vital step in virtually every sample letter in this book. Here are just a few: Samples of instructing. ■ I look forward to hearing from you. My address ... 6/27/03 9:21 AM Page 64 LETTER 5-33: ADVERTISING/MARKETING—SALARY Beginning with the creative use of the company’s motto, this writer weaves industry lingo into a strong cover letter that resulted...
Ngày tải lên: 25/10/2013, 18:20
Tài liệu Trình bày một lá thư xin việc (cover letter) ấn tượng pptx
Ngày tải lên: 09/12/2013, 19:15
Better-Understanding-Sample.pdf
... soon as we secure the global network of the scientific enlightened institutes. The network will cover most of the nations and all the scientists will have international allegiance. It is time ... N_10A 54 54 Click_Here\Fig_29A\Fig_29A.doc Click here to see ‘The Magic Transformation of Ugly Creatures.’ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ... been under observation by the scientists of Planet Progress. These scientists were amazed to discover the great similarities between the two planets. They also understood the criticality of the...
Ngày tải lên: 06/09/2012, 10:03
One-Sample Estimation Problems (TOÁN)
... = ∑ Chương 6: One -Sample Estimation Problems Giảng viên: Nguyễn Phương Contents Introduction Point Estimation Interval Estimation Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Single Sample: Estimating ... n; µ (0;1) / X N S n µ − ; /2 /2 1P X z X z n n α α σ σ µ α − ≤ ≤ + = − Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Từ bảng trên, ta tính được: 2 17 15.1176( ) 4.2353 2.0580( ... µ µ µ = = = = = − = − − − = − − − − + − = − − − ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ Single Sample: Estimating a Proportion Single Sample: Estimating the Mean Ta có 1-α=0.99 Tra bảng ta được: Khoảng...
Ngày tải lên: 12/09/2012, 16:20
AC R Sample Task Type 1 Task
... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts. For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries. The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about onefifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity. The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest. Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause. In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land. The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s. To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides. Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 19601985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent. The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 19751984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies. The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984. A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes). The removal of subsidies also stopped landclearing and overstocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion. Sample task type 1 Questions 10 – 12 Choose the appropriate letters A, B, C or D. Write your answers in boxes 1012 on your answer sheet. 10 ... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts. For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries. The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about onefifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity. The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest. Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause. In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land. The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s. To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides. Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 19601985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent. The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 19751984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies. The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984. A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes). The removal of subsidies also stopped landclearing and overstocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion. Sample task type 1 Questions 10 – 12 Choose the appropriate letters A, B, C or D. Write your answers in boxes 1012 on your answer sheet. 10 ... Sample task type 1 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of government subsidies to farmers. The text preceding this extract explained how subsidies can lead to activities which cause uneconomical and irreversible changes to the environment.] All these activities may have damaging environmental impacts. For example, land clearing for agriculture is the largest single cause of deforestation; chemical fertilisers and pesticides may contaminate water supplies; more intensive farming and the abandonment of fallow periods tend to exacerbate soil erosion; and the spread of monoculture and use of high yielding varieties of crops have been accompanied by the disappearance of old varieties of food plants which might have provided some insurance against pests or diseases in future. Soil erosion threatens the productivity of land in both rich and poor countries. The United States, where the most careful measurements have been done, discovered in 1982 that about onefifth of its farmland was losing topsoil at a rate likely to diminish the soil's productivity. The country subsequently embarked upon a program to convert 11 per cent of its cropped land to meadow or forest. Topsoil in India and China is vanishing much faster than in America. Government policies have frequently compounded the environmental damage that farming can cause. In the rich countries, subsidies for growing crops and price supports for farm output drive up the price of land. The annual value of these subsidies is immense: about $250 billion, or more than all World Bank lending in the 1980s. To increase the output of crops per acre, a farmer's easiest option is to use more of the most readily available inputs: fertilisers and pesticides. Fertiliser use doubled in Denmark in the period 19601985 and increased in The Netherlands by 150 per cent. The quantity of pesticides applied has risen too: by 69 per cent in 19751984 in Denmark, for example, with a rise of 115 per cent in the frequency of application in the three years from 1981. In the late 1980s and early 1990s some efforts were made to reduce farm subsidies. The most dramatic example was that of New Zealand, which scrapped most farm support in 1984. A study of the environmental effects, conducted in 1993, found that the end of fertiliser subsidies had been followed by a fall in fertiliser use (a fall compounded by the decline in world commodity prices, which cut farm incomes). The removal of subsidies also stopped landclearing and overstocking, which in the past had been the principal causes of erosion. Farms began to diversify. The one kind of subsidy whose removal appeared to have been bad for the environment was the subsidy to manage soil erosion. Sample task type 1 Questions 10 – 12 Choose the appropriate letters A, B, C or D. Write your answers in boxes 1012 on your answer sheet. 10 ...
Ngày tải lên: 04/10/2012, 09:39
AC R Sample Task Type 4 Task
... Sample task type 4 [Note: This is an extract from an Academic Reading passage on the subject of dung beetles. The text preceding this extract gave some background facts about dung beetles, and went on to describe a decision to introduce nonnative varieties to Australia.] ... matched with smaller (half this size), temperate-climate Spanish species. The former are slow to recover from the winter cold and produce only one or two generations of offspring from late spring...
Ngày tải lên: 04/10/2012, 09:39
Bạn có muốn tìm thêm với từ khóa: