For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
In conclusion, I agree with this point of view that land should be left in its natural
condition. We need clean air and water and beautiful environment more than modern and
high buildings. We should not proudly say to our child that our heritage to you is forest of
cement. We should care of our environment.
Essay 900 Topic 181 Should lands be developed or left in their natural conditions?
Natural condition and its resources is the best asset that a country should have.
In my country Philippines, it is a known fact that our land is abundantly rich in natural
resources. If someone happened to be there, no one could ever imagine it still exists in
this period of time. But suffice it to say, our country has a greater need for land to be left
in its natural condition. Due to the emergence of the worldwide industrialization and
housing development, our land has been depleted and destructed big time.
First of all, industrialization plays a pivotal role for our country`s economy, which leads
to building factories in the city and some part of the province. The gradual depletion and
destruction of our natural condition are due to these deadly chemical product residues of
these factories that were being thrown out into our sea water which led to the destruction
of our marine, biological life forms and even death to own people living around the area.
Another thing is the cutting of trees in our forest for housing development. Having a
progressive housing development is one thing, but balding our virgin forest is another
thing. This is the reason why when calamities occurred; the problem arises which led the
water to overflow because of insufficient trees in the forest. Since our country is not rich,
our government has no choice, but to invite foreign investors to invest even if it will
jeopardize our need to preserve and maintain our natural condition.
Lastly, I wish our government should start to narrow down the problems. They should be
able to adapt the changing times without hurting our country and its people.
Essay 901 Topic 181 Should lands be developed or left in their natural conditions?
Vietnam is one of the developing countries in the world. It still does not have enough
facilities to support the needs of its people. Hence I feel there is more need for land to be
developed for housing and industry.
There are several reasons that support my choice. The population in Vietnam is very
high. Lack of buildings and houses to live in is one of the major issues for the
government. Firstly the house prices are higher than the controlled price. Secondly, most
people live in big cities making the housing distribution unbalanced. In fact in Vietnam
there are many lands which are still uncultivated and being neglected. To solve the above
problem, the government should use the uncultivated land to build more houses or
blocks, which would improve living conditions.
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
Although having rich resources like people and land, Vietnam has been importing many
products like cars, motorbikes, TV, etc. from other countries. Lack of factories and
manufacturers is the may cause for this. Therefore, building more factories is an urgent
requirement for the Vietnamese Industry. It creates more work opportunities thus
reducing the unemployment rate. Vietnamese can use their own products as well as
export the produces.
Therefore I strongly believe that Vietnam could be stronger and richer if the people know
how to use the land effectively to support their own lives. Vietnam needs land to be
developed for housing and industry more than ever.
Essay 902 Topic 181 Should lands be developed or left in their natural conditions?
It may sound nice to hear that there is more need for land to be left in its natural condition
in my country, Japan. However, to tell the truth, it is because we Japanese have already
developed immeasurable land for housing and industry. Little untouched land left have
become so precious because of wild animals and distinctive floras. Thus, it can be said
that there is some untouched land but there is no developable untouched land left.
However this is also true that there is still need of land for housing and industry. In order
to come off keeping land in its natural condition and creating more space for housing and
industry, more need for the sea to be developed for industry have emerged. For instance,
reclaiming land from the sea for building an airport, a rubbish tip, a warehouse, etc.
Although the propriety of the solution is questionable, this helps keeping untouched land
away from development.
On the other hand, there are increasing multistory buildings. As available land is limited
in spite of great needs for housing and industry, developing underground floors and
constructing higher buildings have become the other solutions. However, as this causes a
side effect such as heat island and space occupied by each person has been becoming
smaller and smaller, this solution cannot be perfect either.
After all, this is impossible to protect all aspects of nature unless we give up industrial
lifestyle. The next issue should be on how to deal with secondary problems caused by
solutions for keeping land in its natural condition.
Essay 903 Topic 181 Should lands be developed or left in their natural conditions?
When discussing the issue of land-use in Germany we should bear several points in mind.
Some people fight for saving the natural areas. Others want to use more land for housing
and industry. There are advantages and disadvantages on both sides.
People who support the statement to develop more land for industry and housing often
present following reasons: Firstly, they mention the high number of people without a
home. Regarding to them it is necessary to built new houses. Secondly, there is a trend to
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
move out of the city center. That means more people want to life outside the town. And
this include the building of new houses near a town. Thirdly, they argue that the
expansion of the industry is necessary to develop the economy. Related to this fact new
facilities and less unemployment should be the result. And the last point they often
mention is that there is a need to explore new natural resources, especially in the energy
sector.
All these facts are true to a certain extend but some important points are missing. In my
point of view there is enough space in the cities or in the industry areas. That means it is
not necessary to built new houses or halls because they just have to rebuilt the old ones,
even it is more expensive. Furthermore, the natural area is as important as the industrial
area because we need space to relax. That means woods for example are very important
and wood is needed to offer fresh air. Moreover we should bear in mind that the
destruction of natural land is related to the destruction of the habitat of animals. Natural
area is also needed for climate regulation and the environmental cycle.
So, to sum up and to make the point, I support the statement that there is more need for
land to be left in its natural condition. It is important to save our environment because we
depend on it.
Essay 904 Topic 181 Should lands be developed or left in their natural conditions?
As we all know that land in its natural condition mainly comprises of trees, rocks and
water. Natural vegetation plays a pivotal role in improving the economic conditions of
the people living in a country. It primarily helps in occurring the rainfall at regular
intervals of time during the year. So I feel that there should be more need for land to be
left in its natural condition rather than using the land for housing and industry.
My country is basically agricultural based country. So the farmers mainly depend on the
rainfall. In order for the rain to occur, there should be enormous number of trees growing
in the country and this can be only attained by not cutting the trees and by not using the
land for the construction of houses and industry. If the crops grow to hundred percent of
farmers expectation, the standard of living of the people will be enhanced. People would
be able to eat food twice a day. They would educate their children. They would provide
themselves with durable clothes. Apart from all these things they feel confident and
satisfied for the hard word they have invested in raising the crops.
My country acts as a central place where there is a good collection of myriad animals and
birds. These species need a lot of land, rich in natural vegetation. By not using the land
for building houses and industries we are indirectly helping the future generation know
the species present in our country. These birds and animals tend to enhance the scenic
beauty of our country. Foreigners would be interested in viewing the beauty which in turn
increases the revenue of the country. As the revenue increases, there would be a lot
developmental activities which would takes place which would improve the social
conditions of the people living in the country.
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
So I strongly feel that there should be more need for land to be left in its natural
conditions which would improve the country position in international markets. Apart
from these a lot trade would be developed with the neighboring countries.
Essay 905 Topic 181
Nowadays more and more lands are replaced by industrial factories or houses. The
number of sky scrapes is increasing rapidly and wild environment is ruined by human
activities. Although no one can deny need for house and shelter, most of today's building
and forest destroying is because of selfishness of human being. In my country, Iran there
is more need for land to be left its natural condition, because we need fresh air, natural
environment and more than modern building or building new factories. I live in the most
polluted city of the world, Tehran. Unfortunately, the number of population who migrate
from country to Tehran is increasing daily, consequently demanding for house and food
and job is increasing. The Empty lands are built for this huge number of population and
also many factories are founded to create jobs. In fact we face a crowded city with many
sky scrape and huge building which like monsters can be seen in the city. Furthermore,
much forest has destroyed and many trees and plants have cut down just because of
stupid behavior of human. No one pay attention to healthiness of people. Besides of
house, people need fresh air and diseases are gifts of pollution. In my opinion, trees and
forests are valuable nature for human and no one should destroy them easily and because
of greed not need. At last but not least, I strongly believe that we are responsible for next
generation. Many of the natural conditions back to thousands of years and we should care
of them. Maybe because of human activities and house building they vanish forever. Next
generation deserves fresh air, green and beautiful environment and pure water instead of
smoke, gas and high buildings. These are the first rights of human being to be alive. In
conclusion, I agree with this point of view that land should be left in its natural condition.
We need clean air and water and beautiful environment more than modern and high
buildings. We should not proudly say to our child that our heritage to you is forest of
cement. We should care of our environment.
Essay 906 Topic 181
It may sound nice to hear that there is more need for land to be left in its natural condition
in my country, Japan. However, to tell the truth, it is because we Japanese have already
developed immeasurable land for housing and industry. Little untouched land left have
become so precious because of wild animals and distinctive floras. Thus, it can be said
that there is some untouched land but there is no developable untouched land left.
However this is also true that there is still need of land for housing and industry. In order
to come off keeping land in its natural condition and creating more space for housing and
industry, more need for the sea to be developed for industry have emerged. For instance,
reclaiming land from the sea for building an airport, a rubbish tip, a warehouse, etc.
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
Although the propriety of the solution is questionable, this helps keeping untouched land
away from development. On the other hand, there are increasing multistory buildings. As
available land is limited in spite of great needs for housing and industry, developing
underground floors and constructing higher buildings have become the other solutions.
However, as this causes a side effect such as heat island and space occupied by each
person has been becoming smaller and smaller, this solution cannot be perfect either.
After all, this is impossible to protect all aspects of nature unless we give up industrial
lifestyle. The next issue should be on how to deal with secondary problems caused by
solutions for keeping land in its natural condition.
Essay 907 Topic 181
Natural condition and its resources is the best asset that a country should have. In my
country Philippines, it is a known fact that our land is abundantly rich in natural
resources. If someone happened to be there, no one could ever imagine it still exists in
this period of time. But suffice it to say, our country has a greater need for land to be left
in its natural condition. Due to the emergence of the worldwide industrialization and
housing development, our land has been depleted and destructed big time. First of all,
industrialization plays a pivotal role for our country's economy, which leads to building
factories in the city and some part of the province. The gradual depletion and destruction
of our natural condition are due to these deadly chemical product residues of these
factories that were being thrown out into our sea water which led to the destruction of our
marine, biological life forms and even death to own people living around the area.
Another thing is the cutting of trees in our forest for housing development. Having a
progressive housing development is one thing, but balding our virgin forest is another
thing. This is the reason why when calamities occurred; the problem arises which led the
water to overflow because of insufficient trees in the forest. Since our country is not rich,
our government has no choice, but to invite foreign investors to invest even if it will
jeopardize our need to preserve and maintain our natural condition. Lastly, I wish our
government should start to narrow down the problems. They should be able to adapt the
changing times without hurting our country and its people.
Essay 908 Topic 181
Nowadays more and more lands are replaced by industrial factories or houses. The
number of sky scrapes is increasing rapidly and wild environment is ruined by human
activities. Although no one can deny need for house and shelter, most of today's building
and forest destroying is because of selfishness of human being. In my country, Iran there
is more need for land to be left its natural condition, because we need fresh air, natural
environment and more than modern building or building new factories. I live in the most
polluted city of the world, Tehran. Unfortunately, the number of population who migrate
from country to Tehran is increasing daily, consequently demanding for house and food
and job is increasing. The Empty lands are built for this huge number of population and
also many factories are founded to create jobs. In fact we face a crowded city with many
sky scrape and huge building which like monsters can be seen in the city. Furthermore,
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
much forest has destroyed and many trees and plants have cut down just because of
stupid behavior of human. No one pay attention to healthiness of people. Besides of
house, people need fresh air and diseases are gifts of pollution. In my opinion, trees and
forests are valuable nature for human and no one should destroy them easily and because
of greed not need. At last but not least, I strongly believe that we are responsible for next
generation. Many of the natural conditions back to thousands of years and we should care
of them. Maybe because of human activities and house building they vanish forever. Next
generation deserves fresh air, green and beautiful environment and pure water instead of
smoke, gas and high buildings. These are the first rights of human being to be alive. In
conclusion, I agree with this point of view that land should be left in its natural condition.
We need clean air and water and beautiful environment more than modern and high
buildings. We should not proudly say to our child that our heritage to you is forest of
cement. We should care of our environment.
Essay 909 Topic 181
It may sound nice to hear that there is more need for land to be left in its natural condition
in my country, Japan. However, to tell the truth, it is because we Japanese have already
developed immeasurable land for housing and industry. Little untouched land left have
become so precious because of wild animals and distinctive floras. Thus, it can be said
that there is some untouched land but there is no developable untouched land left.
However this is also true that there is still need of land for housing and industry. In order
to come off keeping land in its natural condition and creating more space for housing and
industry, more need for the sea to be developed for industry have emerged. For instance,
reclaiming land from the sea for building an airport, a rubbish tip, a warehouse, etc.
Although the propriety of the solution is questionable, this helps keeping untouched land
away from development. On the other hand, there are increasing multistory buildings. As
available land is limited in spite of great needs for housing and industry, developing
underground floors and constructing higher buildings have become the other solutions.
However, as this causes a side effect such as heat island and space occupied by each
person has been becoming smaller and smaller, this solution cannot be perfect either.
After all, this is impossible to protect all aspects of nature unless we give up industrial
lifestyle. The next issue should be on how to deal with secondary problems caused by
solutions for keeping land in its natural condition.
Essay 910 Topic 181
Natural condition and its resources is the best asset that a country should have. In my
country Philippines, it is a known fact that our land is abundantly rich in natural
resources. If someone happened to be there, no one could ever imagine it still exists in
this period of time. But suffice it to say, our country has a greater need for land to be left
in its natural condition. Due to the emergence of the worldwide industrialization and
housing development, our land has been depleted and destructed big time. First of all,
industrialization plays a pivotal role for our country's economy, which leads to building
factories in the city and some part of the province. The gradual depletion and destruction
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
of our natural condition are due to these deadly chemical product residues of these
factories that were being thrown out into our sea water which led to the destruction of our
marine, biological life forms and even death to own people living around the area.
Another thing is the cutting of trees in our forest for housing development. Having a
progressive housing development is one thing, but balding our virgin forest is another
thing. This is the reason why when calamities occurred; the problem arises which led the
water to overflow because of insufficient trees in the forest. Since our country is not rich,
our government has no choice, but to invite foreign investors to invest even if it will
jeopardize our need to preserve and maintain our natural condition. Lastly, I wish our
government should start to narrow down the problems. They should be able to adapt the
changing times without hurting our country and its people.
Essay 911 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
In modern society, more and more people like to keep pets in their family. And some of
them treat their pets as a member in their family. They eat with their pets, stroll with their
pets, and even sleep with their pets. Although someone think there is no problem with
such relationship, I am not totally agreed with it.
Undoubtedly, keeping a pet at home can provide us a lot of fun. We can play with to our
pets when we feel lonely, we can tell our secret to our pets since they always be a good
listener and will never expose our secret. Moreover, some pets can protect their host
when they are in danger. But there are still many disadvantages.
We should notice that pets never can be real human, so it is impossible to establish a
relationship with your pet which is same as you establish with human. A pet cannot think
in the same way as us, and a pet cannot really understand human beings` emotion, so it is
stupid to assume that your pet can understand what you think or your pet is your best
friend in the world.
Furthermore, there are now more and more stores devoted entirely to pets. They sell pet
food, pet toys, pet clothes and pet homes. All of these stuff for pets are expensive,
however, some pets owner do not care about the price and spend hundreds of dollars on
supplies for their pets. Do they have ever thought about that there are still many children
in the world who do not have food, toys, and clothes? We feed our pets with the
expensive food but never care about some of the human beings is suffering hunger at the
same time! Why do not now use this money to help them first?
In addition, if you have the habit to read newspaper, you can find a lot of report like
Someone was attacked by neighbor`s dog yesterday. Pets bring so many problems to our
society administration and make us in danger.
In brief, compared to live with a pet and spend our money and time on it, it is wiser to
pay more attention to our parents, friends and other people in our society and spend
superfluous money on charity.
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
Essay 912 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
Pets in the past are often cats, dogs, birds, however, nowadays, even snakes and worms
are called pets too. It is undeniable that they are lovely friends of people, especially the
old, children and single ones, but I do not think that it is good to treat pets as members of
family as the following reasons.
First, pets are only animals, and cannot be treated as human beings. Although some
animals such as dogs and cats have been domesticated for a long time and are intelligent
in some aspects, they do not have human feelings. Their instincts only enable them to
distinguish between good and bad, love and hate, while people ourselves have many
kinds and levels of feelings. In addition, pets regard people as their master rather than
friends. Their actions towards people are fidelity, not friendliness. Treating them as
people can make them confused as they have not developed enough to understand these
treatments.
Second, while some pets are treated as man, other individuals are considered animals.
These people are the poor who have no homes, no food. Nobody cares about his or her
life, they get away from them as if these poor people suffer from an epidemic. They are
people but do not have the rights of man. Meanwhile, cats and dogs have either
wonderful houses or enough food or the care of people. These facts are unfair.
Some people may argue over the second reasons that the poor are none of their business.
They do not have any relation with them. Nevertheless, should people not raise pets, they
will have time caring about their relatives, their friends and their relationships. For
instant, single people raised cats, dogs or other animals because they feel lonely, but had
they not raised pet, they would have found their lovers.
In conclusion, I personally think that not treating pets as human beings would be better
for the animals themselves, the masters and other people. We should consider them as
they are, not as what we want them to be.
Essay 913 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
There is much disagreement over whether people should keep a close relationship with
their pets or not. Some people think that too close to pets could do harm to people. Other
people, however, argue that a good relationship with their pets can help them a lot. As far
as I am concerned, I like to have a close relationship with pets.
Why some people want to keep away from pets? For one thing, sometimes pets may be
out of control and hurt their owners. No matter how smart a pet is, it is still an animal
with wild animal features. For another, sometimes pets maybe spread diseases to people.
Although I agree that there may be one or two disadvantages of pets, I insist that a good
relationship with them far overweigh these disadvantages. In the first place, pets can give
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
people companionship under some circumstances, especially old people. In many west
countries, it is very popular that old people live only with their pets, because their
children are very busy and do not have time to spend with them or some other reasons. At
this time, their pets can company their owners 24 hours 7 days. To these old people, pets
are their members of family.
In the second place, some pets can help disable people. As we already know, trained dogs
can guild blind people walking. Although pets are just animals, sometimes they can do
something unexpectedly. For example, several years ago, there was a well-known news
that a dog dialed ?11?to save its very sick owner.
In conclusion, I believe that keeping a close relationship with pets is good to people not
only because the pets can make people feel not lonely, but also because pets can help
people in a special way.
Essay 914 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
There are some people that like their pets a lot and they think people should treat the pets
as family members. Others think that it is not good to keep a close relationship with pets.
If I would be asked this question, my opinion would follow the latter. In the following
discussion I would like to provide reasons and evidence to support my viewpoint.
No issue is more important today than the one that keeping a close relationship with your
pet may harm the relationship between you and other people. I will try to explain this
with some examples. Since you have to take care of you pet, you have no time to go out
with your friends and you may have no time to talk to your family. Also, if you feel that
it is easier to get along with animals, you may lose interest in getting along with people.
As a result, you will be isolated from the community. Moreover, some people treat their
pets even better than their sons or daughters, which is illogical. Do not you think the
examples given above are very persuasive?
Keeping a close relationship with a pet costs money. This is another main reason that I
have chosen to put here to support my argument. I could not think a better example to
illustrate my viewpoint as the following. If you treat your pets as your family members,
you will want to give the best thing to your pets. It will cost you a lot of money to buy the
pets` food. In addition, if the pet got ill, you would have to it to the animal hospital. You
will pay a good amount of money for its treatment and medicine fee. If you ever had a
pet, you should understand this point better.
However, having pets also has its advantages. Some animals are human`s friends and
sometimes they help us a lot. But the disadvantages of keeping a close relationship to pets
carry far more weight than those of its advantages. So the reason I think people should
not keep a close relationship with their pets is very obvious.
To sum up, given the reasons discussed above, which sometimes intertwine to form an
For more material and information, please visit TaiLieu Du Hoc at
www.tailieuduhoc.org
organic whole, and thus become more persuasive, we could safely arrive at the
conclusion that people should not keep such a close relationship with their pets. It affects
the relationship between you and other people and it also wastes your money.
Essay 915 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
I do not think any thing wrong with being close to one`s pets, having a dog myself;
however, pets are just pets, treating them like family members is a bit too extreme in my
points of view. Not that too close a relationship is not good though, since study has
shown those neglected by others often turn to animals for conversation and by doing that
they actually feel accepted and less lonely. Pets are indeed good friends for loners.
However, spending too much time with one`s pet can influence one`s character, in a bad
way. A friend of mine had a cat some years ago, a lovely purely-bred. She started talking
to the cat after a while, treating it like a human-being capable of rational thinking. She
became less sociable and very irritable at work and we all thought her sudden change of
temperament was due to the pressure and stress in the company. One day I went to her
house and I was shocked to see that she treated the cat like an equal. She helped the cat to
food first before we started dinner, she let the cat choose channel by putting its paws on
the remote control and she talked of the cat with such fondness that one would suspect
she was talking of her own child. I was horrified. Why one can go to such extremes to
spoil her pet is beyond my understanding and it is certainly not a healthy relationship. I
have once seen a dog wearing brand shoes on all four paws and a bright jumper; it strikes
me as total madness.
However, one should treat his pet well. A pet is after all a life and all lives on earth
deserve good treatment, love and care. Giving a dog or some other animal to a young
child whose parents are spoiling him is a good way to teach him what is to love and care
for others, apart from being loved and cared for. And a pet is a good playmate to a little
child especially if his parents are busy out working. Safety precautions should be taken if
the pet we are talking about here is some big animals like a dog but in most cases, it is
not an issue of concern. Child learns a lot from playing with the family pet and it is
indeed a good thing to get close to a pet in this case. The dog is a loyal friend and the
child learns to be loyal to his friends once he sees how the dog, his pet, would sacrifice its
life to save that of its master`s, as has happened countless times before; the touching
stories are often reported in newspaper and some magazines.
On the whole, it is definitely good to get close to one`s pet but the thing is not to go
extreme. Pets are human`s friends and indeed we should cherish and take care of these
loyal friends.
Essay 916 Topic 182 Is human relationship with pets useful?
Nowadays there are many people around the word who has close relationship with their
pets. you can see many people with their cats or dogs are roaming In the park, in street
. country`s economy, which leads
to building factories in the city and some part of the province. The gradual depletion and
destruction of our natural. educate their children. They would provide
themselves with durable clothes. Apart from all these things they feel confident and
satisfied for the hard word