THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng | |
---|---|
Số trang | 111 |
Dung lượng | 2,28 MB |
Nội dung
Ngày đăng: 01/08/2021, 15:59
Nguồn tham khảo
Tài liệu tham khảo | Loại | Chi tiết |
---|---|---|
8. Gardner, T. (2002, February 8). Peer review: Narrative. [Online Article]. Retrieved November 15, 2018, from the World WideWeb:http://www.readwritethink.org /lessons/ lesson_view.asp? id=122 | Link | |
34. Spencer, J. (2017). How Action Research Sparks Innovation and Boosts Creativity In Classroom. Retrieved from:http://www.spencerauthor.com/how-action-research-sparks-innovation- | Link | |
64. Oxford Learners Dictionaries, 2019. Writing. [Online] 65. Available at:https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/writing?q=writing | Link | |
1. Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multipole draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257 | Khác | |
2. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Teachers. CUP | Khác | |
3. Carr, W., and Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Lewes: The Falmer Press | Khác | |
4. Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 165-193 | Khác | |
5. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing,10, 161-184 | Khác | |
6. Ferris, D.R., Pezone, S., Tade, & C.R., Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Description and implications. Journal of Second language Writing, 6(2), 155-182 | Khác | |
7. Gocsik, K. (2005, July 12). Peer groups [Online Article]. Retrieved October 20, 2018, from the World WideWeb:www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/faculty/methods/peergroups.shtml | Khác | |
9. Gabriela, B.& Cabral, J., 2007. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), pp. 478-489 | Khác | |
10. Hitchcock, G., and Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher: A Qualitative Introduction to School-based Research. Routledge | Khác | |
11. Hodges, A. (2004, August 3). Peer review. [Online Article]. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from the World Wide Web | Khác | |
17. Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. (1998). Feedback on Student Writing: Taking the Middle Path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 307-317 | Khác | |
18. Jacobs, G. (1989). Mis-correction in peer feedback in writing class. REALL Journal, 20(1) | Khác | |
19. Johnson, D. M., and Chen, L. (1992). Researchers, Teachers, and Inquiry. In D. M. Johnson (Eds.), Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. Longman, 212-227 | Khác | |
20. Levine, A., Oded, B., Connor, U., &Assons, I. (2002). Variation in EFL - ESL Peer Response. TESLEJ (6) 3 | Khác | |
21. Lehtinen, B., & Yates, N. (2008). Using video to coach peer revision in writing. JALT 2007 Conference Proceedings. 1101-1022 | Khác | |
22. Ly, L. N., 2014. TRAINING STUDENT TO DO PEER REVIEW TO IMPROVE THEIR WRITTEN ENGLISH PROFICIENCY.NGÔNNGỮ&ĐỜISỐNG, 11(229), pp. 51-55 | Khác | |
23. Malina, M. A., Nứrreklit, H. S. &Selto, F. H., 2011. Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), pp. 59-71 | Khác |
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN