(Luận án tiến sĩ) finite dimensional asymptotic behavior of navier stokes voigt equations

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING HANOI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION NGUYEN THI NGAN FINITE-DIMENSIONAL ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF NAVIER-STOKES-VOIGT EQUATIONS DOCTORAL DISSERTATION OF MATHEMATICS Hanoi - 2021 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING HANOI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION NGUYEN THI NGAN FINITE-DIMENSIONAL ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF NAVIER-STOKES-VOIGT EQUATIONS Speciality: Differential and Integral Equations Speciality Code: 9.46.01.03 DOCTORAL DISSERTATION OF MATHEMATICS Supervisor: PROF DR CUNG THE ANH Hanoi - 2021 COMMITTAL IN THE DISSERTATION I assure that the scientific results presented in this dissertation are new and original To my knowledge, before I published these results, there had been no such results in any scientific document I take responsibility for my research results in the dissertation The publications in common with other authors have been agreed by the co-authors when put into the dissertation February, 2021 Author Nguyen Thi Ngan i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation was carried out at the Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Hanoi National University of Education It was completed under the supervision of Prof Cung The Anh First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Prof Cung The Anh, for the continuous support of my PhD study, for his carefulness, patience, enthusiasm and immense knowledge His guidance helped me in all the time of research to learn and grow a lot, both professionally and personally Sometimes he set me back on the road when I got lost I would like to say that I am proud to be his student Besides my supervisor, I am greatly grateful to Assoc Prof Tran Dinh Ke for his encouragement during the time I have studied at Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Hanoi National University of Education I am deeply indebted to Dr Vu Manh Toi for his help and many interesting discussions during my first one year I thank all the lecturers and PhD students at the seminar of Division of Mathematical Analysis for their stimulating consultation and valuable comments I would like to thank all my colleagues at University of Education Publisher and Foreign Language Specialized School, VNU, for supporting me to study during the last three years I also thank my friends, who always encourage me to overcome difficulties during my period of study Last but not least, I am greatly thankful to my beloved family for respecting all my decisions and supporting me spiritually throughout my life Hanoi, 2021 Nguyen Thi Ngan ii CONTENTS COMMITTALINTHEDISSERTATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS LISTOFSYMBOLS INTRODUCTION Chapter PRELIMINARIES AND AUXILIARY RESULTS 1.1 Function spaces 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4 1.2 The global attractor 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.3 Determining functionals 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 1.4 The Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with p 1.5 The Gronwall inequalities Chapter BOUNDS ON THE NUMBER OF DETERMINING NODES FOR 3D NAVIER-STOKES-VOIGT EQUATIONS 2.1 Problem setting 2.2 Preliminaries 2.3 Determining nodes for instationary solutio 2.4 Determining nodes for stationary solution 2.5 Determining nodes for periodic solutions Chapter FEEDBACK CONTROL OF NAVIER-STOKES-VOIGT EQUATIONS iii BY FINITE DETERMINING PARAMETERS 3.1 Problem setting 3.2 Preliminaries 3.3 Stabilization of Navier-Stokes-Voigt equa operator as feedback controllers 3.3.1 Feedback control employing finite v onto Fourier modes as an interpol 3.3.2 Feedback control employing finitely m Chapter ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL NON-HOMOGENEOUS NAVIER-STOKES-VOIGT EQUATIONS 4.1 Problem setting 4.2 Preliminaries 4.3 Existence and uniqueness of weak solutio 4.4 Existence of a global attractor 4.4.1 Existence of an absorbing set 4.4.2 The asymptotic compactness 4.5 Fractal dimension estimate of the global a 4.6 Existence and exponential stability of a st 4.7 Determining projections and functionals fo CONCLUSIONSANDFUTUREWORKS LISTOFPUBLICATIONS REFERENCES iv LIST OF SYMBOLS R Rd A:=B ¯ A (., )X ∥x∥X ∗ X ′ x , x X∗,X X,→Y p L (Ω) L (Ω) ∞ ∞ C0 (Ω) ¯ C(Ω) m,p H (Ω), m Wm (Ω), H0 (Ω) m H − L (Ω) (., ) ((., )) ((., ))1 |.| ∥.∥ ∥.∥1 x·y (Ω) ∇ ∇y y·∇ ∇ · y, div y V H, V p L (0, T ; X), < p < ∞ the space of functions f : [0, T ] → X such ∞ L 1,p W (0, T ; X) C([0, T]; X) {xk} xk → x xk ⇀ x ∗ xk ⇀ x i.e a.e p 2D 3D (0,T;X) INTRODUCTION Motivation and overview of the problems Fluid dynamics is a subdiscipline of fluid mechanics that describes the flow of fluids (liquids and gases) Fluid dynamics has a wide range of applications, including calculating forces and moments on aircraft, determining the mass flow rate of petroleum through pipelines, predicting weather patterns, understanding nebulae in interstellar space and modelling fission weapon detonation One of the most important equations in fluid dynamics is the Navier-Stokes equations Navier-Stokes equations, are partial differential equations that describe the flow of incompressible fluids The equations are generalization of the equations devised by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler in the 18th century to describe the flow of incompressible and frictionless fluids In 1821, French engineer ClaudeLouis Navier introduced the element of viscosity (friction) for the more realistic and vastly more difficult problem of viscous fluids Throughout the middle of the 19th century, British physicist and mathematician Sir George Gabriel Stokes improved on this work, though complete solu-tions were obtained only for the case of simple two-dimensional flows The complex vortices and turbulence, or chaos, that occur in three-dimensional fluid (including gas) flows as velocities increase have proven intractable to any but approximate numerical analysis methods The Navier-Stokes equations are ut − ν∆u + (u · ∇)u + ∇p = f(x, t), ∇ · u = 0, d posed on a spatial domain Ω ⊂ R , d ∈ {2, 3}, supplemented with appropriate boundary conditions Here u is the unknown velocity, the parameter ν > is the kinematic viscosity, and p is the scalar pressure, which serves to enforce the divergence-free condition ·u = The right hand side is a ”body force”, which serves to maintain some nontrivial motion of the fluid 4.7 Determining projections and functionals for weak solu-tions Following [28], we give the following definition ∞ Definition 4.7.1 Let u, v ∈ L (0, ∞; H (Ω)) be weak solutions to the two following Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations, respectively ut − α ∆ut − ν∆u + (u · ∇)u + ∇p = f in Ω × (0, T ), ∇ · u = in Ω × (0, T ), (4.43) u = φ on ∂Ω, u(0) = u0, vt − α ∆vt − ν∆v + (v · ∇)v + ∇p = g in Ω × (0, T ), ∇ · v = in Ω × (0, T ), (4.44) v = φ on ∂Ω, v(0) = v0, ∞ where f, g are given external forces in L (0, ∞; L (Ω)) and satisfy lim |f(t) − g(t)| = t→∞ The projection operator RN : H (Ω) → VN ⊂ L (Ω), N = dim(VN ) < ∞, is called a determining projection for weak solutions of 3D NavierStokes-Voigt equations if tlim |RN (u(t) − v(t))| = 0, →∞ implies that 2 lim (|u(t) − v(t)| + α ∥u(t) − v(t)∥ ) = t→∞ N N Let {ϕi} i=1 be a basis of VN and let {li} i=1 be a set of bounded linear functionals from L (Ω) We can construct a projection operator as N X RN (u) := i=1 li(u)ϕi Suppose that whenever lim |li(u(t) − v(t))| = 0, i = 1, , N, t→∞ 84 N it implies that (4.45) holds, then we can say that the set {l i} i=1 forms a N set of determining functionals We see that the basis {ϕi} i=1 neither be divergence-free nor span a subspace of H (Ω) Moreover, Definition 4.7.1 encompasses each of the concepts of determining nodes, modes and N N volumes by making particular choices for the sets {ϕ i} i=1 and {li} i=1 For more details, we refer the interested reader to [27, 28] We define the generalized Grashof number Gr0 in dimension three as Gr0 = ˆ ˆ ∞ where f = f + ν∆ψ − (ψ · ∇)ψ, f ∈ L (0, ∞; L (Ω)) The following theorem is the main result in this section ∞ Theorem 4.7.2 Let u, v ∈ L (0, ∞; H (Ω)) be the weak solutions to problems (4.43) and (4.44), respectively, and f(t), g(t) are given ∞ forces in L (0, ∞; L (Ω)) satisfying lim |f(t) − g(t)| = t→∞ If there exists a projection operator RN : H (Ω) → VN , N = dim(VN ), satisfying tlim |RN (u(t) − v(t))| = 0, →∞ and satisfying for some θ > the approximation inequality −θ |u − RN u| ≤ C1N ∥u∥1, for some positive constant C1 and N satisfying ∞>N> where c and Gr0 are given in (4.9) and (4.46), respectively, then 2 lim (|u(t) − v(t)| + α ∥u(t) − v(t)∥ ) = t→∞ Proof Let ψ ∈ H (Ω) be a fixed function satisfying (4.11)-(4.12) We set ue = u −ψ, ve = v −ψ then u,e ve ∈ V and satisfy the following problem, respectively ˆ uet + α Auet + νAue + B(u,e ue) + B(u,e ψ) + B(ψ, ue) = f, ue(0) = ue0, 85 vet + α Avet + νAve + B(v,e ve) + B(v,e ψ) + B(ψ, ve) = g,ˆ ve(0) ˆ = ve0, where f = f + ν∆ψ −(ψ ·∇)ψ, gˆ = g + ν∆ψ −(ψ ·∇)ψ, ue0 = u0 −ψ, ve0 = v0 − ψ Setting z = ue − ve then z ∈ V is a solution of the following problem d dt (z + α Az) + νAz + B(u, u) − B(v, v) + B(u, ψ) − B(v, ψ) ee and z(0) := z0 = ue0 − ve0 = u0 − v0 We take the scalar product of (4.49) with z to obtain d 2 2 dt (|z| + α ∥z∥ ) + ν∥z∥ = −b(u,e u,e z) + b(v,e v,e z) − b(u,e ψ, z) b(v,e ψ, z) − b(ψ, u,e z) + ˆ + b(ψ, v,e z) + (f − g,ˆ z) ˆ = −b(z, v,e z) − b(z, ψ, z) + (f − g,ˆ z) (4.50) Using Lemma 4.3.2, inequality (4.9) and Young’s inequality, we ν have b(z, ψ, z) ≤ 4∥z∥ , 1/2 1/2 b(z, v,e z) ≤ c∥z∥ ∥ve∥ ∥z∥ |z| 3/2 ≤ c∥z∥ ≤ ∥z∥2 + e 8ν3 ν ∥ve∥ |z| 54c4 1/2 ∥v∥4|z|2 Applying the Cauchy inequality we get ˆ (f − g,ˆ z) ≤ Therefore, (4.50) implies that dt 2 2 (|z| + α ∥z∥ ) + ν∥z∥ − From the supposition (4.47), we have 2 −2θ 2 |z| ≤ 2C1 N ∥z∥ + 2|RN z| 86 Therefore, (4.51) is equivalent to d dt 216c ≤ ν From (4.24), (4.46) then t for Hence, using (4.6) then (4.52) becomes d dt ≤ for t large enough From the assumption, we have and tlim |RN z(t)| = tlim |RN (u(t) − v(t))| = tlim |RN (u(t) − v(t))| = →∞ then 3456c (1 + λ where γ = Furthermore, from (4.53) we have where β = 87 Applying Lemma 1.5.2, we obtain 2 2 2 lim (|z(t)| + α ∥z(t)∥ ) = lim (|ue(t) − ve(t)| + α ∥ue(t) − ve(t)∥ ) = t→∞ t→∞ Since u = ue + ψ and v = ve + ψ, we have 2 lim (|u(t) − v(t)| + α ∥u(t) − v(t)∥ ) = t→∞ This completes the proof Remark 4.7.3 It is worthy noticing that when ψ ≡ 0, from Theorem 4.7.2 we can get the bounds on some determining functionals such as determining modes, nodes and finite volumes for 3D NavierStokes-Voigt equations with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, which are similar to those in the case of periodic boundary conditions obtained recently in [29, 36] The existence of global solutions and of a finite-dimensional global attractor to three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with non-homogeneous boundary conditions in this chapter can be seen as an extension of previous results in the case of homogeneous boundary con-ditions (i.e φ ≡ 0) obtained in [17, 36] Conclusion of Chapter In this chapter, we have studied the existence and long-time behavior of solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with non-homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions We have achieved the following results: 1) The existence and uniqueness of global weak solutions (Theorem 4.3.3); 2) The existence of a global attractor for the semigroup generated by weak solutions (see Remark 4.1.1 and Theorem 4.4.4); 3) The finiteness of the fractal dimension of the global attractor (see Remark 4.1.1 and Theorem 4.7.2); 4) A sufficient condition for exponential stability of weak stationary so-lutions (Theorem 4.6.2); 88 5) The existence of determining projections for weak solutions (Theorem 4.7.2) These are the first results about long-time behavior of solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with nonhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions 89 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS Conclusion In this dissertation, we have been investigated the long-time behavior of solutions to three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations by some approaches: the global attractor, determining nodes and stabilization of stationary solutions by finite-dimensional feedback controls The main contributions of the dissertation are to the following: 1) Give bounds on the number of determining nodes for solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with periodic boundary conditions 2) Prove the stabilization of stationary solutions to the Navier-StokesVoigt equations with periodic boundary conditions by finitedimensional feedback controls 3) Prove the existence and long-time behavior of solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations with nonhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions in terms of the existence of a finite-dimensional global attractor and the existence of determining projec-tions The results obtained in the dissertation are meaningful contributions to the Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations as well as the theory of infinite-dimensional dissipative dynamical systems Future works Some suggestions for potential future works are proposed below: 1) Existence of approximate internal manifold for the threedimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations (see the survey article [56] for related results on Navier-Stokes equations) 2) Data assimilation for three-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations (see [9, 19] for results on Navier-Stokes equations) 90 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS Published papers [CT1 ] V.M Toi and N.T Ngan (2020), Upper bounds on the number of determining nodes for 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations, Ann Pol Math 125, no 1, 83-99 [CT2 ] N.T Ngan and V.M Toi (2020), Feedback control of NavierStokes-Voigt equations by finite determining parameters Acta Math Viet-nam 45 (2020), no 4, 917-930 Submitted papers [CT3 ] C.T Anh and N.T Ngan (2020), Asymptotic behavior of threedimensional non-homogeneous Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations, sub-mitted to Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 91 REFERENCES [1] R.A Adams (1975), Sobolev Spaces, Academic Press, New York [2] D.A.F Albanez, H.J Nussenzveig-Lopes and E.S Titi (2016), Con-tinuous data assimilation for the three-dimensional NavierStokes-α model, Asymptot Anal 97, 139-164 [3] C.T Anh, N.T.M Toai and V.M Toi (2020), Upper bounds on the number of determining modes, nodes, and volume elements for a 3D magenetohydrodynamic-α model, J Appl Anal Comput 10, 624-648 [4] C.T Anh and V.M Toi (2017), Stabilizing the long-time behavior of the Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations by fast oscillating-in-time forces, Bull Polish Acad Sci Math 65, 177-185 [5] C.T Anh and P.T Trang (2013), Pull-back attractors for threedimensional Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations in some unbounded do-mains, Proc Roy Soc Edinburgh Sect A 143, 223-251 [6] C.T Anh and P.T Trang (2016), Decay rate of solutions to the m 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations in H space, Appl Math Lett 61, 1-7 [7] C.T Anh and P.T Trang (2017), On the regularity and convergence of solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations, Comput Math Appl 73, 601-615 [8] C.T Anh and N.V Tuan (2020), Stabilization of 3D Navier-StokesVoigt equations, Georgian Math J., 27 (2020), no 4, 493-502 [9] A Azouani, E Olson and E.S Titi (2014), Continuous data assim-ilation using general interpolant observables J Nonlinear Sci 24, 277-304 [10] A Azouani and E.S Titi (2014), Feedback control of nonlinear dissipative systems by finite determining parameters: a reactiondiffusion paradigm, Evol Equ Control Theory 3, 579-594 92 [11] L.C Berselli and L Bisconti (2012), On the structural stability of the Euler-Voigt and Navier-Stokes-Voigt models, Nonlinear Anal 75, 117-130 [12] R.M Brown, P.A Perry and Z Shen (2000), On the dimension of the attractor of the nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations in non-smooth domains, Indiana Univ Math J 49, 1-34 [13] D Catania (2011), Global attractor and determining modes for a hyperbolic MHD turbulence model, J Turbul 12, Paper 40, 20 p [14] A.O Celebi, V.K Kalantarov and M Polat (2009), Global attractors for 2D Navier-Stokes-Voight equations in an unbounded domain, Appl Anal 88, 381-392 [15] B Cockburn, D Jones and E.S Titi (1997), Estimating the asymp-totic degrees of freedom for nonlinear dissipative systems, Math Comp 66, 1073-1087 [16] P Constantin and C Foias (1988), Navier-Stokes Equations, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics University of Chicago Press, Chicago [17] M Coti Zelati and C.G Gal (2015), Singular limits of Voigt models in fluid dynamics, J Math Fluid Mech 17, 233-259 [18] M.A Ebrahimi, M Holst and E Lunasin (2013), The Navier-StokesVoight model for image inpainting, IMA J Appl Math 78, 869-894 [19] A Farhat, E Lunasin and E.S Titi, Abridged continuous data assimilation for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations utilizing measure-ments of only one component of the velocity field, J Math Fluid Mech 18 (2016), 1-23 [20] C Foias, O.P Manley, R Temam and Y Treve (1983), Asymptotic analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations, Physica D 9, 157-188 [21] C Foias, O Manley, R Rosa and R Temam (2001), NavierStokes Equations and Turbulence, Cambridge University Press [22] C Foias and G Prodi (1967), Sur le comportement global des solutions des solutions non-stationnaires des equations de NavierStokes en dimension 2, Rend Semin Mat Univ Padova 39, 1-34 93 [23] C Foias and R Temam (1984), Determination of the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations by a set of nodal values, Math Comp 43, 117-133 [24] C Foias and E.S Titi (1991), Determining nodes, finite difference schemes and inertial manifolds, Nonlinearity 4, 135-153 [25] J Garc´ıa-Luengo, P Mar´ın-Rubio and J Real (2012), Pullback at-tractors for three-dimensional non-autonomous NavierStokes-Voigt equations, Nonlinearity 25, 905-930 [26] J.D Gibbon and E.S Titi (1997), Attractor dimension and small length scale estimates for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equa-tions, Nonlinearity 10, 109-119 [27] M Holst, E Lunasin and G Tsogtgerel (2010), Analysis of a general family of regularized Navier-Stokes and MHD models, J Nonlinear Sci 20, 523-567 [28] M.J Holst and E.S Titi (1997), Determining projections and functionals for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations Re-cent developments in optimization theory and nonlinear analysis (Jerusalem, 1995), 125–138, Contemp Math., 204, Amer Math Soc., Providence, RI [29] N.D Huy, N.T Ngan and V.M Toi (2020), On the number of deter-mining volume elements for 3D Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations, Acta Math Viet., 45 (2020), no 4, 967-980 [30] D Jones and E Titi (1992), On the number of determining nodes for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations, J Math Anal Appl 168, 72-88 [31] D.A Jones and E.S Titi (1992), Determining finite volume elements for the 2D Navier-Stokes equations, Physica D, vol 60, no 1–4, pp 165-174 [32] D Jones and E.S Titi (1993), Upper bounds on the number of de-termining modes, nodes, and volume elements for the Navier-Stokes equations, Indiana Univ Math J 42, 875-887 [33] N Ju (2000), Estimates of asymptotic degrees of freedom for solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinearity 13, 777-789 94 [34] V.K Kalantarov (1988), Attractors for some nonlinear problems of mathematical physics, Zap Nauchn Sem LOMI, 152, 50-54 [35] V.K Kalantarov, B Levan and E.S Titi (2009), Gevrey regularity for the attractor of the 3D Navier-Stokes-Voight equations, J Nonlinear Sci 19, 133-152 [36] V.K Kalantarov and E.S Titi (2009), Global attractor and determining modes for the 3D Navier-Stokes-Voight equations, Chin Ann Math Ser B 30, 697-714 [37] V.K Kalantarov and E.S Titi (2016), Finite-parameters feedback control for stabilizing damped nonlinear wave equations, Nonlinear analysis and optimization, 115-133, Contemp Math., 659, Amer Math Soc., Providence, RI [38] V.K Kalantarov and E.S Titi (2018), Global stabilization of the Navier-Stokes-Voight and the damped nonlinear wave equations by finite number of feedback controllers, Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 23, 1325-1345 [39] P Korn (2011), On degrees of freedom of certain conservative turbu-lence models for the Navier-Stokes equations, J Math Anal Appl 378, 49-63 [40] R.H Kraichnan (1967), Interial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence, Phys Fluids, 10, 1417-1423 [41] O Ladyzhenskaya (1991), Attractors for Semigroups and Evolution Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [42] L Landau, E Lifschitz (1953), Fluid Mechanics, AddisonWesley, New-York [43] E.M Lunasin, Y Cao and E.S Titi (2006), Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous and inviscid simplied bardina turbulence models, Commun Math Sci 4, 823-848 [44] E Lunasin and E Titi (2017), Finite determining parameters feed-back control for distributed nonlinear dissipative systems-a compu-tational study, Evol Equ Control Theory 6, 535-557 95 [45] A Miranville and X Wang (1996), Upper bounded on the dimension of the attractor for nonhomogeneous Navier-Stokes equations, Disc Cont Dyn Syst 2, 95-110 [46] C.J Niche (2016), Decay characterization of solutions to Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations in term of the initial datum, J Differential Equations 260, 4440-4453 [47] A.P Oskolkov (1973), The uniqueness and solvability in the large of boundary value problems for the equations of motion of aqueous solutions of polymers, Zap Nauchn Sem Leningrad Otdel Math Inst Steklov (LOMI) 38, 98-136 [48] Y Qin, X Yang and X Liu (2012), Averaging of a 3D NavierStokes-Voigt equations with singularly oscillating forces, Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 13, 893-904 [49] G Raugel (2002), Global Attractors in Rartial Differential Equations Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol 2, 885-982, NorthHolland, Amsterdam [50] J.C Robinson (2001), Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom [51] J.C Robinson (2001), Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems An Introduction to Dissipative Parabolic PDEs and the Theory of Global Attractors, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [52] R Temam (1979), Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis, 2nd edition, Amsterdam, North-Holland [53] R Temam (1984), Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis, 3rd edition, Amsterdam, North-Holland [54] R Temam (1995), Navier-Stokes Equations and Nonlinear Func-tional Analysis, second ed., SIAM, Philadelphia [55] R Temam (1997), Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Me-chanics and Physics, 2nd edition, Springer, New York [56] E.S Titi (1990), On approximate inertial manifolds to the NavierStokes equations, J Math Anal Appl 149, pp 540-557 96 [57] D Wu and C Zhong (2006), The attractors for the nonhomogeneous nonautonomous Navier-Stokes equations, J Math Anal Appl 321, 426-444 [58] X.G Yang, L Li and Y Lu (2018), Regularity of uniform attractor for 3D non-autonomous Navier-Stokes-Voigt equation, Appl Math Comput 334, 11-29 [59] X Yang, B Feng, T.M de Souza and T Wang (2019), Long-time dynamics for a non-autonomous Navier-Stokes-Voigt equation in Lipschitz domains, Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 24, 363-386 [60] G Yue and C.K Zhong (2011), Attractors for autonomous and nonautonomous 3D Navier-Stokes-Voight equations, Discrete Cont Dyna Syst Ser B 16, 985-1002 [61] C Zhao and H Zhu (2015), Upper bound of decay rate for solutions to the Navier-Stokes-Voigt equations in R , Appl Math Comput 256, 183-191 [62] C.Zhao, Y Li and M Zhang (2018), Determining nodes of the global attractor for an incompressible non-Newtonian fluid, J Appl Anal Comput 8, 954-964 97 ... the solution of Navier- Stokes- Voigt equations is not smoother than initial condition Note that when α = 0, we recover the Navier- Stokes equations of motion The Navier- Stokes- Voigt equations has... to Navier- StokesVoigt equations have attracted the attention of a number of mathematicians The existence and long-time behavior of solutions in terms of existence of attractors to the Navier- Stokes- Voigt. .. the three -dimensional NavierStokes -Voigt equations with periodic boundary conditions (P2) The stabilization of stationary solutions of the Navier- StokesVoigt equations in both cases of dimension