Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
Features of skeletal data with the human postures obtained from Kinect camera are extracted using a PCA algorithm.. For fall recognition and sending notification message, a SVM a[r]
(1)The 1st UTS-VNU Research School
Advanced Technologies for IoT Applications
PROBLEM STATEMENT
- Establish a system can recognize fall and then generate alarm signals for emergency
- This system have to accurate distinction between normal and fall activities in the indoor
RESULTS
REFERENCES
[1] E.E.Stone and M.Skubic, “Falls Detection in Homes of Older Adults Using the Microsoft Kinect,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol 19, pp 290-301, 2014
[2] A.Dubois, and F.Charpillet, “Human Activities Recognition with RGB-Depth Camera using HMM,” The 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp 4666 – 4669, 2013
[3] C Kawatsu, J Li, and C J Chung, “Development of a Fall Detection System with Microsoft Kinect,” International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications, vol 208, pp 623-630, 2012
FUTURE WORK
- Developing real time recognition uses embedded systems - Improving the accuracy of recognition applies other
algorithm (HMM, NN, …) and more than samples - Using internet to monitor and control system
- Development for the mobile app
ABSTRACT
Falls are the major reason of serious injury and dangerous accident for elderly people A recognition system is necessary to recognize falls early for help and treatment In this research, three subjects were introduced a system of fall recognition with five pairs of human postures (non-fall-fall, fall-stand, fall-sit, fall-bend, fall-lying) using a Kinect camera system Features of skeletal data with the human postures obtained from Kinect camera are extracted using a PCA algorithm For fall recognition and sending notification message, a SVM algorithm is applied for training the feature data and classifying these postures Experimental results show that the high effectiveness of the proposed approach for fall recognition and alert is nearly 82%
CONTRIBUTIONS
PCA-SVM ALGORITHM FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SKELETAL DATA-BASED EIGEN POSTURES
An Hoai Trinh, an.th@sgu.edu.vn
Department of Electronics – Telecommunications, Saigon University, Vietnam
- PCA method applied to extract features of data SVM algorithm employed to classify of fall and non-fall
- Skeletal data was obtained from Kinect camera system
Figure System of fall recognition and alert
- The subjects were performed on three people by eight postures with 2400 samples
- 1200 falls (fall front, fall back, fall left, fall right)
- 1200 non-falls (stand, sit on chairs, bend, lie down on the floor)
- Analysis data based on the skeletal (3D) data of “Head” joints at y-axis as figure 2,3
Figure Data of “head” joints at y-axis
Figure Illustrating activities of human falls
Figure Block diagram of an alarm
system
Activity Type Sample
Recognized
results Accuracy (%)
Fall Non-fall
Fall Training 1200 976 224 81.8
Test 600 491 109 81.3
Non-fall
Training 1200 996 204 83.5 Test 600 501 99 83
No Recognized
case Activity Samples
Accuracy (%)
1 Fall - Stand Fall 600 81.9 Stand 300 83.6
2 Fall - Sit on a chair
Fall 600 81.1 Sit on a chair 300 82.9
3 Fall - Bend Fall 600 81.4 Bend 300 82.3
4 Fall - Lie down
on the floor
Fall 600 80.9 Lie down on floor 300 79.6
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure “Head” joints data of fall:(a) Fall
forward (b) Fall backward.(c) Fall left (d) Fall right
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
Time (second)
A
m
p
lit
u
d
e
(a)
(d) (c)
(b)
Figure “Head” joints data of non-fall:
(a) Stand (b) Sit on chair (c) Bend (d) Lie down on floor
Table Recognition Results of Fall and Non-fall Table Recognition Results of Fall and other postures
Figure Operation of the fall system with
notification message and calls
- The distribution data of fall and normal postures at “head” joint shows in figure 5,6
- The average accuracy of system is about 82.2% for trained samples and 82.7% for test samples as table