GSM and UMTS (P14)

Chapter 14: Voice Codecs Kari Ja ¨ rvinen 1 14.1 Overview Five voice codecs have been standardised for GSM. These are: † Full-Rate (FR) codec † Half-Rate (HR) codec † Enhanced Full-Rate (EFR) codec † Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) codec † Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) codec All voice codecs include speech coding (source coding), channel coding (error protection and bad frame detection), concealment of erroneous or lost frames (bad frame handling), Voice Activity Detection (VAD), and a low bit rate source controlled mode for coding background noise. The codecs operate either in the GSM full-rate traffic channel at the gross bit rate of 22.8 kbit/s (FR, EFR, AMR-WB), or in the half-rate channel at the gross bit rate of 11.4 kbit/s (HR), or in both (AMR). AMR and AMR-WB have also been specified for use in 3G WCDMA. The FR codec [1] was the first voice codec defined for GSM. The codec was standardised in 1989. It uses 13.0 kbit/s for speech coding and 9.8 kbit/s for channel coding. FR is the default codec to provide speech service in GSM. The HR codec [2] was developed to bring channel capacity savings through operation in the half-rate channel. The codec was standardised in 1995. It operates at 5.6 kbit/s speech coding bit rate with 5.8 kbit/s used for channel coding. The codec provides the same level of speech quality as the FR codec, except in background noise and in tandem (two encodings in MS-to-MS calls) where the performance is somewhat lower. The EFR codec [3] was the first codec to provide digital cellular systems with voice quality equivalent to that of a wireline telephony reference (ITU G.726-32 ADPCM standard at 32 kbit/s). The EFR codec brings substantial quality improvement over the previous GSM codecs. EFR was standardised first for the GSM based PCS 1900 system in the US during 1995 and was adopted to GSM in 1996. The EFR codec uses 12.2 kbit/s for speech coding and 10.6 kbit/s for channel coding. A further development in GSM voice quality was the standardisation of the AMR codec [4] in 1999. AMR offers substantial improvement over EFR in error robustness in the full-rate 1 The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of his affiliation entity. GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication Edited by Friedhelm Hillebrand Copyright q 2001 John Wiley & Sons Ltd ISBNs: 0-470-84322-5 (Hardback); 0-470-845546 (Electronic) channel by adapting speech and channel coding depending on channel conditions. Channel capacity is gained by switching to operate in the half-rate channel during good channel conditions. The AMR codec includes several modes for use both in the full- and half-rate channel. The speech coding bit rates are between 4.75 and 12.2 kbit/s in the full-rate channel (eight modes) and between 4.75 and 7.95 kbit/s in the half-rate channel (six modes). The AMR codec was adopted in 1999 by 3GPP as the default speech codec to the 3G WCDMA system. The AMR-WB codec [5] is the most recent voice codec. It was standardised in 2001 for both GSM and 3G WCDMA systems. Later in 2001, rapporteur’s meeting of ITU-T Q.7/16 choose the AMR-WB speech codec for the new ITU-T wideband coding algorithm of speech at around 16 kbit/s. AMR-WB is an adaptive multi-rate codec like the AMR (narrowband) codec. AMR-WB brings quality improvement through the use of extended audio bandwidth. While all previous codecs in digital cellular systems operate on narrow audio bandwidth limited below 3.4 kHz, AMR-WB extends the bandwidth to 7 kHz. Wideband coding brings improved voice quality especially in terms of increased voice naturalness. AMR-WB consists of nine modes operating at speech coding bit rates between 6.6 and 23.85 kbit/s. A voice codec related development in GSM and 3G WCDMA was the definition of in-band Tandem Free Operation (TFO). This feature was completed including TFO for AMR in March 2001 [23]. TFO brings improvement in speech quality for MS-to-MS calls by avoiding double transcoding in the network. TFO can be employed when the same speech codec is used at both ends of the call. The speech coding part in all the voice codecs is based on the use of Linear Predictive Coding (LPC). All except the FR codec belong to the class of speech coding algorithms generally known as Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP). All codecs operate at the sampling rate of 8 kHz except AMR-WB which uses 16 kHz sampling rate. Channel coding in all codecs is based on convolution coding for error correction combined with Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) for error detection. Three protection classes are typically used: bits protected by the convolutional code and CRC, bits protected by the convolutional code alone, and bits without any error protection. The voice codec specifications define the speech codec bit-exactly to guarantee high basic voice quality. For bad frame handling, only an example solution is given to allow the possibility for implementation-specific performance improvements in error concealment. Tables 14.1–14.3 give a summary of the GSM voice codecs: standards, implementation complexity, and algorithmic delay. 14.2 Codec Selection Process The development of GSM voice codecs has been carried out in ETSI SMG11 and in its predecessors. Finalisation of channel coding has taken place under SMG2. The AMR-WB codec was developed jointly by SMG11 and 3GPP TSG-SA WG4. All the voice codecs have been chosen through a competitive selection process among several candidate codec algorithms. Before the codec selection process starts, speech quality performance requirements and codec design constraints (e.g. implementation complexity and transmission delay) have to be defined. For the most recent codecs (AMR and AMR-WB), the launch of standardisation has been preceded by a feasibility study phase to validate the new codec concept. GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication372 Chapter 14: Voice Codecs 373 Table 14.1 Voice codec standards Codec Year of standard Speech coding bit-rate (in kbit/s) System/traffic channel Speech coding algorithm FR codec 1989 13.0 GSM FR Regular Pulse Excitation – Long Term Prediction (RPE-LTP) HR codec 1995 5.6 GSM HR Vector-Sum Excited Linear Prediction (VSELP) EFR codec 1996 12.2 GSM FR Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) AMR codec 1999 12.2, 10.2, 7.95, 7.4, 6.7, 5.9, 5.15, 4.75 GSM FR (all eight modes), GSM HR (six lowest modes), 3G WCDMA (all modes) Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) AMR-WB codec 2001 23.85, 23.05, 19.85, 18.25, 15.85, 14.25, 12.65, 8.85, 6.60 GSM FR (seven lowest modes), EDGE (all modes), 3G WCDMA (all modes) Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) Table 14.2 Implementation complexity of voice codecs Codec Speech codec complexity GSM channel codec complexity WMOPS Data RAM (16-bit kwords) Data ROM (16-bit kwords) Program ROM (1000 assembly instructions) WMOPS Data RAM (16-bit kwords) Data ROM (16-bit kwords) Program ROM (1000 assembly instructions) FR codec 3.0 1.2 0.1 0.9 1.7 1.7 0.8 0.3 HR codec 18.5 4.4 7.9 4.1 2.7 3.2 0.9 1.3 EFR codec 15.2 4.7 5.3 1.8 See complexity of the FR channel codec AMR codec a 16.8 5.3 14.6 4.9 5.2 (FR), 2.9 (HR) 2.6 (FR), 2.4 (HR) 5.2 1.3 AMR-WB codec a 35.4 6.4 9.9 3.8 3.5 2.9 3.2 0.6 a Complexity of channel quality measurement and mode control is counted as part of channel coding. The selection process typically consists of two phases: a qualification (pre-selection) phase and a selection phase. During the qualification phase, the most promising candidate codecs are chosen to enter the selection phase. The qualification is usually based on in-house listening tests. In the selection phase, the codec proposals are tested more comprehensively in several independent test laboratories and using multiple languages. The codec proposals are implemented in C-code with fixed-point arithmetics. For both phases, the codec propo- nents need to deliver documentation of their proposal including a justification of meeting all design constraints. The codec selection is based both on the speech quality of the candidate codecs and on fulfilling other design requirements. After codec selection, a verification phase and a characterisation phase will take place. An optimisation phase may be launched to improve some key performances of the codec if there is sufficient promise of improvement. During the verification phase, the codec is subjected to further analysis to verify its suitability for the intended systems and applications. A detailed analysis of implementation complexity and transmission delay is also carried out during this phase. The final phase of codec standardisation is the characterisation phase. This is launched after the approval of the codec standard to characterise the codec in a large variety of operational conditions. The output is a technical report on performance characterisation which provides information on codec performance. 14.3 FR Codec In the FR voice codec, the speech coding part is based on the Regular Pulse Excitation – Long Term Prediction (RPE-LTP) algorithm [6]. The frame length is 20 ms, i.e. a set of codec parameters are produced every 20 ms. The speech codec operates at 13.0 kbit/s while 9.8 kbit/ s is used for channel coding. FR is the default codec to provide speech service in GSM. The FR speech codec carries out short-term LPC analysis once every frame (without any lookahead over future samples). The rest of the coding is performed in 5 ms sub-frames. The short-term residual signal, after LPC analysis, is further compressed by using Long-Term Prediction (LTP) analysis. LTP removes any long-term correlation remaining in the short- term residual signal. The long-term residual is then decimated into a sparse signal in which only every third sample has a non-zero value. The non-zero samples are located on a regular grid. The grid starting position is determined separately for each sub-frame based on the energy of the sub-frame. This Regular Pulse Excitation (RPE) approach results in rather efficient coding. Only the non-zero samples in the long-term residual need to be quantised GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication374 Table 14.3 Algorithmic transmission delay components of the speech codecs Codec Frame length (ms) Lookahead in LPC analysis (ms) FR codec 20 0 HR codec 20 4.4 EFR codec 20 0 AMR codec 20 5 AMR-WB codec 20 5 and sent to the decoder. The parameters for each 20 ms frame consist of a set of LPC- coefficients (reflection coefficients) and a set of parameters describing the short-term residual for each sub-frame (LTP parameters, RPE parameters). A block diagram of the encoder is shown in Figure 14.1. The FR channel codec uses convolution coding for protecting the 182 most important bits out of the 260 bits in each frame [11]. A 3 bit CRC is employed for bad frame detection. The CRC covers the most important 50 bits. The FR codec, like all GSM and 3G WCDMA codecs, includes a low bit rate source controlled mode for coding background noise only (voice activity detection with discontin- uous transmission). This saves power in the mobile station and also reduces the overall interference level over the air-interface. The complexity of the FR speech codec is about 3.0 WMOPS (weighted million operations per second). The complexity has been estimated from a C-code implemented with a fixed point function library in which each operation has been assigned a weight representative for performing the operation on a typical DSP. The channel coding requires about 1.7 WMOPS [13]. 14.4 HR Codec The HR codec employs the Vector-Sum Excited Linear Prediction (VSELP) speech coding algorithm [7]. VSELP belongs to the class of CELP codecs. The codec uses 20 ms frame length. The speech codec operates at the bit rate of 5.6 kbit/s while 5.8 kbit/s is used for channel coding. Like most CELP codecs the HR VSELP employs two codebooks: a fixed codebook and an adaptive codebook. The adaptive codebook is derived from the long-term filter state (and therefore the content of the codebook changes frame-by-frame). The adaptive codebook is Chapter 14: Voice Codecs 375 Figure 14.1 Block diagram of the GSM FR speech encoder used to generate a periodic component in the excitation, while the fixed codebook generates a random-like component. The excitation sequence is coded by choosing the best match from each of the two codebooks. The excitation that produces the least decoding error is chosen (analysis-by-synthesis). The codebook indices and gains are computed once for every 5 ms subframe. A lookahead of 35 samples is employed in the LPC analysis. A specific feature in VSELP is the structure of the fixed codebook. The fixed codebook is constructed as a linear combination (vector sum) of only a small amount of basis vectors. There are four modes based on how voiced each 20 ms speech frame is. For the least voiced mode, the adaptive codebook is not used at all, and a second fixed VSELP codebook is used instead. The HR channel codec employs convolution coding protecting 95 out of the 112 bits in each frame [11]. A 3 bit CRC covers the most important 22 bits. The HR codec provides the same level of speech quality as the FR codec, except in background noise and during tandem (two encodings in MS-to-MS calls) where the perfor- mance lacks somewhat behind the FR codec. The computational complexity of the speech codec is about 18.5 WMOPS. The complexity of the channel codec is about 2.7 WMOPS [13,14]. 14.5 EFR Codec The EFR codec gives substantial quality improvement compared to the previous GSM codecs. EFR is the first codec to provide digital cellular systems with quality equivalent to that of a wireline telephony reference (ITU G.726-32 ADPCM standard at 32 kbit/s). The EFR codec standardisation started in ETSI in 1995. Wireline quality was set as a development target because GSM had become increasingly used in communication environ- ments where it started to compete directly with fixed line or cordless systems. To be compe- titive also with respect to speech quality, GSM needed to provide wireline speech quality which is robust to typical usage conditions such as background noise and transmission errors. A similar development of enhanced quality full-rate codec was carried out for the GSM based PCS 1900 system in the US during 1995. An EFR codec was standardised for the PCS 1900 system already in 1995. The PCS 1900 EFR codec was one candidate considered for the GSM EFR standard and it was adopted to GSM through a competitive selection process. In addition to voice quality performance, the advantage of using the same voice codec in PCS 1900 and in GSM was one factor in favour of this particular solution. The GSM EFR codec standard was approved in January 1996 (at SMG#17). The EFR speech codec is based on the Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) algorithm [8,18]. The speech coding bit rate is 12.2 kbit/s whereas 10.6 kbit/s is used for channel coding. The codec operates on 20 ms frames which are divided into four 5 ms sub- frames. Two sets of LPC parameters are calculated for each 20 ms frame with no lookahead over samples in the next frame. EFR employs an adaptive and a fixed codebook. The code- book parameters are computed once for each 5 ms sub-frame. The name ACELP refers to the type of fixed codebook where algebraic code is used to populate the excitation vectors. The ACELP codebook contains a small number of non-zero pulses with predefined interlaced sets of positions. In EFR, the 40 positions in each 5 ms sub-frame are divided into five tracks where each track contains two pulses. Each excitation vector contains ten non-zero pulses with amplitudes of 21or11. Figure 14.2 gives a block diagram of the EFR speech encoder. GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication376 The EFR channel codec is almost the same as the FR channel codec because a key design aim was to keep it as similar as possible. During the GSM EFR codec standardisation, the use of the existing FR channel codec (or existing GSM generator polynomials) was encouraged since this minimises hardware changes in the GSM base stations and thus potentially speeds up the introduction of the EFR codec. In the PCS 1900 EFR codec standardisation, the use of the existing FR channel codec was a mandatory requirement. Therefore, the FR channel codec was included in the EFR channel codec as a module together with additional error protection [11]. The additional 0.8 kbit/s error protection consists of an 8 bit CRC to provide improved detection of frame errors and a repetition code for improved error correction. The implementation complexity of EFR is lower than that of the HR codec. Computational complexity of the speech codec is about 15.2 WMOPS. The complexity of the channel codec is about the same as for the FR codec [13,16]. Figure 14.3a,b shows the performance of the EFR codec compared to the FR codec and to a wireline quality reference G.726-32 (32 kbit/s ADPCM) [15,16]. Figure 14.3a shows the performance for clean speech under transmission errors. The dotted line shows the perfor- mance of (error-free) G.726-32. The EFR codec gives substantial improvement over the FR codec in the error-free channel and in error conditions down to a carrier-to-interference ratio (C/I) of 7 dB. EFR provides wireline quality still at approximately 10 dB C/I. Figure 14.3b shows the performance in background noise for the error-free channel with four types of background noise (home 20 dB SNR, car 15 and 25 dB SNR, street 10 dB SNR, and office 20 dB SNR). The results demonstrate substantial improvement over FR. In many test cases EFR exceeds the performance of the wireline quality reference of 32 kbit/s ADPCM. 14.6 AMR Codec The EFR codec was the first codec to provide digital cellular systems with quality equivalent to that of a wireline telephony reference. However, it still left some room for improvements. In particular, the performance in severe channel error conditions could be improved by Chapter 14: Voice Codecs 377 Figure 14.2 Block diagram of the GSM EFR speech encoder employing a different bit allocation between speech and channel coding. This led into devel- opment of a new type of codec that is able to adapt to the channel quality conditions. The concept of adaptive multi-rate coding was born. The standardisation of AMR was launched in October 1997 (at SMG#23). Already before that a one-year feasibility study had been carried out to validate the novel AMR concept. The selection process consisted of a qualification and a selection phase. The qualification phase was carried out during spring 1998. Altogether 11 candidate codecs were submitted. In June 1998 (at SMG#26), the five most promising candidates were chosen to enter the selection tests. The selection phase took place from July 1998 until the selection of the codec in October 1998 (at SMG#27). After the selection, a short optimisation phase took place. The optimisation was focused on making improvements for the channel coding part and bringing corrections to the codec C-code. During the optimisation, the complexity of channel coding was reduced while at the same time obtaining some performance improvements. The AMR codec standard was formally approved in February 1999 at SMG#28 (speech coding part) and GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication378 Figure 14.3 GSM EFR performance: (a) in transmission errors for clean speech, and (b) under back- ground noise in June 1999 at SMG#29 (channel coding part). A detailed description of the AMR codec standardisation process can be found in [19]. The main principle behind AMR is to adapt to radio channel and traffic load conditions and select the optimum channel mode (full-rate or half-rate) and codec mode (bit rate trade-off between speech and channel coding) to deliver the best combination of speech quality and system capacity. AMR provides good overall performance and high granularity of bit rates making it suitable also for systems and applications other than GSM. In 1999, the AMR codec was adopted by 3GPP as the default speech codec to provide speech service in the 3G WCDMA system. The AMR codec contains a set of fixed rate speech and channel codecs, link adaptation, and in-band signalling. Each AMR codec mode provides a different level of error protection through a different distribution of the available gross bit rate between speech and channel coding. The link adaptation process bears responsibility for measuring the channel quality and selecting the optimal speech and channel codecs. In-band signalling transmits the measured channel quality and codec mode information over the air-interface. The in-band signalling is transmitted along with the speech data. The AMR speech codec utilises the ACELP algorithm employed also in the EFR codec. The frame length is 20 ms which is divided into four 5 ms sub-frames. A 5 ms lookahead is used. The codec contains eight codec modes with speech coding bit rates of 12.2, 10.2, 7.95, 7.4, 6.7, 5.9, 5.15 and 4.75 kbit/s [9,20]. As seen in Figure 14.4a, all the speech codecs are employed in the full-rate channel, while the six lowest ones are used in the half-rate channel. All the modes provide seamless switching between each other. The GSM EFR, D-AMPS EFR, and PDC EFR speech codecs are included in the AMR as the 12.2, 7.4 and 6.7 kbit/s modes, respectively. Some minor harmonisation to other modes (e.g. in the post-processing) has been carried out for these codecs when used within AMR. The AMR 12.2 kbit/s speech codec was later defined as an alternative implementation of the EFR speech codec. Error protection in GSM is based on Recursive Systematic Convolutional (RSC) coding with puncturing to obtain the required bit rates [11]. Each codec mode also employs a 6 bit CRC for detecting bad frames. All channel codecs use convolution polynomials previously specified for GSM (either for speech or data traffic channels) to maximise commonality with the existing GSM system. For 3G channels, the general channel coding toolbox of the 3G WCDMA system is used. Figure 14.5 shows a basic block diagram of the AMR codec in GSM. The Mobile Station (MS) and the Base Transceiver Station (BTS) both perform channel quality estimation for the receive signal path. Based on the channel quality measurements, a codec mode command (over downlink to the MS) or a codec mode request (over uplink to network) is sent in-band over the air-interface. The receiving end uses this information to choose the best codec mode for the prevailing channel conditions. A codec mode indicator is also sent over the air- interface to indicate the current mode of operation. The codec mode in the uplink may be different from the one used in the downlink on the same air-interface, but the channel mode (FR or HR) must be the same. The network controls the uplink and downlink codec modes and channel modes. The mobile station must obey the codec mode command from the network, while the network may use any complementing information, in addition to codec mode request, to determine the downlink codec mode. The mobile station must implement all the codec modes. However, the network can support any combination of them, based on the choice of the operator. In GSM, Chapter 14: Voice Codecs 379 the in-band signalling supports adaptation between up to four active codec modes. The set of active codec modes is selected at call set-up (and in handover). Codec mode command/ request and codec mode indication are transmitted in every other speech frame in GSM (alternating within consecutive frames). Therefore, the codec mode can be changed every 40 ms. In 3G WCDMA, AMR can adapt between all the eight modes and can switch modes every 20 ms. To obtain interoperability with GSM AMR under TFO, the 3G AMR adaptation rate can be limited to 40 ms in uplink. Link adaptation is an essential part of the AMR codec. It consists of channel quality measurement and codec/channel mode adaptation algorithms [12,21]. Link adaptation in AMR is two-fold: it adapts the bit-partitioning between speech and channel coding within a transmission channel (codec mode), and the operation in the GSM full- and half-rate channels (channel mode). Depending on the channel quality and possible network constraints (e.g. network load), link adaptation selects the optimal codec and channel mode. Figure 14.4b shows an example of how the codec mode adaptation operates in the GSM full-rate channel under dynamic error conditions. Channel quality varies between about 22 and 2 dB C/I. Based GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication380 Figure 14.4 (a) Bit rate trade-off between speech and channel coding in AMR. (b) AMR codec mode adaptation in GSM full-rate channel under dynamic error conditions [...]... Speech Coding, Porvoo, Finland, June 1999 Bruhn S et al Concepts and solutions for link adaptation and in-band signaling for the GSM AMR speech coding standard IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1999 Results of AMR Wideband (AMR-WB) codec selection phase, 3GPP TSG-SA TDoc SP-000555, Bangkok, Thailand, December 2000 TS 28.062, In-band Tandem Free Operation (TFO) of speech codecs ... equal to ITU-T 64 kbit/s wideband codec G.722-64k In the GSM full-rate channel, AMR-WB gives error-free quality at least equal to the 56 kbit/s wideband codec G.722-56k When restricted to codec modes with bit rates capable of 16 kbit/s submultiplexing over the A-bis/A-ter interface (14.25 kbit/s and below), quality in the GSM full-rate channel still exceeds that of the GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global... a wideband speech codec for GSM (with audio bandwidth up to 7 kHz instead of 3.4 kHz) was addressed already during the feasibility study of the AMR codec When the AMR codec standardisation was launched in October 1997 (at SMG#23), the work was focused on developing narrowband AMR codec Wideband coding was set as a possible longer-term target ETSI SMG11 carried out a feasibility study on wideband coding... major quality improvement over narrowband telephony through the use of extended audio bandwidth The introduction of a wideband speech service (audio bandwidth extended to 7 kHz) offers significantly improved voice quality especially in terms of increased voice naturalness With AMR-WB, the GSM and 3G WCDMA systems will provide speech quality exceeding that of (narrowband) wireline quality The AMR-WB codec... on the test setting and conditions and are not directly comparable between tests.) 382 GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication Figure 14.6 (a) AMR FR performance for clean speech, (b) AMR HR performance for clean speech, (c) AMR FR performance for clean speech, (performance curves of each codec mode), (d) AMR FR performance for speech under 15 dB SNR car noise, and (e)AMR HR performance... in the EFR and AMR codecs The codec uses a 20 ms frame length, divided into 5 ms subframes for coding of codebook parameters A 5 ms lookahead is used Coding is carried out separately for two frequency bands (50–6400 Hz and 6400–7000 Hz) The codec operates at the speech coding bit rates of 23.85, 23.05, 19.85, 18.25, 15.85, 14.25, 12.65, 8.85 and 6.6 kbit/s [10] Error protection in GSM FR and EDGE channels... EFR quality (equivalent to G.728 for clean speech, and to G.729 and error-free GSM FR for speech under background noise) Figure 14.6 shows examples of the performance in GSM full-rate channel taken from GSM AMR characterisation tests [17] Figure 14.6a,b shows the performance of the best codec mode for each C/I condition for clean speech in the full-rate and halfrate channels, respectively Figure 14.6c... showed that the target is feasible The study considered development of AMR-WB not only for GSM full-rate channel, but also for GSM EDGE channels, and for 3G WCDMA Based on the results, ETSI SMG launched in June 1999 (at SMG#29) a standardisation of AMR wideband codec 3GPP TSG-SA had approved a work item on wideband coding already a couple of months earlier in March 1999, but the effective start of the... et al GSM enhanced full rate codec Proc IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Munich, Germany, 20–24 April 1997 ¨ Jarvinen K Standardisation of the adaptive multi-rate codec Proc X European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2000), Tampere, Finland, September 4–8, 2000 Ekudden E et al The AMR speech codec Proc IEEE Workshop on Speech Coding, Porvoo, Finland, June... diagram of the AMR codec in GSM on estimated channel quality, one out of three codec modes (12.2, 7.95 or 5.9 kbit/s) is chosen The computational complexity of the AMR speech codec is about 16.8 WMOPS which is only about 10% higher than for EFR The complexity of the AMR channel codec is 5.2 WMOPS in the GSM full-rate channel and 2.9 WMOPS in the GSM half-rate channel [13,17] In the GSM full-rate channel, . Porvoo, Finland, June 1999. [21] Bruhn S. et. al. Concepts and solutions for link adaptation and in-band signaling for the GSM AMR speech coding standard concept. GSM and UMTS: The Creation of Global Mobile Communication372 Chapter 14: Voice Codecs 373 Table 14.1 Voice codec standards Codec Year of standard