1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Comparative empirical analysis of motivational differences of various generational cohorts

109 16 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 109
Dung lượng 2,14 MB

Nội dung

MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION – HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DISSERTATION Comparative empirical analysis of motivational differences of various generational cohorts in the Irish workplace A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Dublin Business School for the degree of M.B.A in Human Resource Management Katarzyna Raganowicz-Gargasz Student number 1257909 Thesis Advisor: Claire Devlin May 2014 Declaration: I Katarzyna Raganowicz - Gargasz declare that all the work in this dissertation is entirely my own unless the words have been placed in inverted commas and referenced with the original source Furthermore, texts cited are referenced and placed in the reference section A full reference section is included within this thesis 20th of May 2014 To my family Especially to my parents whose willing sacrifice and ongoing support made it all possible, for which I am forever grateful “An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking To generalize means to think” – Georg Wilhelm Hegel “All generalizations are false, including this one” – Mark Twain Abstract Building on previous research on inter-generational differences, this study seeks to examine whether differences in motivational factors truly exist in the Irish workplace across various generations Using the data gathered through Motivational Factors Questionnaire as measures of motivational drivers, the study examined cross-sectional differences in three groups of working population in Ireland: Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y Results are not entirely supportive of generational stereotypes that have been present in the popular and management literature and media This analysis found some radical differences between various drivers of different generations, however, these might be attributed to the age rather than generational difference overall Even though, statistically differences were quite significant, in practice they might not pose such difficulty in overall management approach Furthermore, analysis of current literature available on the subject has revealed some discrepancies and showed that present research did not have the same results on some occasions In order to get a better understanding of the profiles and factors that motivate Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y, all three age groups were tested against five motivational drivers: compensation, free-time, advancement potential, work environment and more responsibilities Differences found, although statistically significant, are not considerably impactful on the workplace and may be because of the various life stages presented by the age group However, it does not remove the fact that each age group does think differently because of the specific environment one was growing up in and various situations it was exposed to in their life-time It may mean that although they are different as people, in the work setting they will be similar Present analysis has many limitations and further research in the field is recommended Overall, organizations need to foster the environment for respect and mindfulness to create the bridge linking all age groups to build and maintain a productive workforce Key words: Generation, Motivation, Generation X, Generation Y, Baby Boomers, Human Resource Word count: Thesis - 19,866 Reflection on learning and development - 1,728 Table of Contents ABSTRACT LIST OF FIGURES: LIST OF TABLES: CHAPTER INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND OF THE TOPIC .9 BACKGROUND OF THE RESEARCHER 10 LEARNING STYLE 11 RESEARCH QUESTION 12 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 12 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS 13 THESIS DISPOSITION 13 RECIPIENTS OF THE RESEARCH 14 CHAPTER 15 LITERATURE REVIEW 15 FOREWORD 15 2.1 DEFINITIONS 16 2.1.1 Generation 16 2.1.2 Generation Gap 17 2.2 BABY BOOMERS – CHARACTERISTICS 18 2.3 GENERATION X – CHARACTERISTICS 19 2.4 GEN Y – CHARACTERISTICS 20 2.5 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF MOTIVATION 22 2.5.1 Motivation - definitions .22 2.5.2 What motivates employees? .23 2.6 REVIEW OF EXISTING STUDIES 24 CHAPTER 33 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 33 INTRODUCTION 33 3.1 DEFINITIONS 33 3.1.1 Research .33 3.1.2 Methodology .34 3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN 35 3.3 CHOSEN METHODOLOGY 35 3.4 THE RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY – POSITIVISM 36 3.5 THE RESEARCH APPROACH: DEDUCTIVE APPROACH: TESTING THEORY 37 3.6 RESEARCH STRATEGY: SURVEY 38 3.7 THE RESEARCH CHOICE: QUANTITATIVE MONO-METHOD APPROACH 40 3.8 TIME HORIZON: CROSS-SECTIONAL 42 3.9 RESPONDENTS: POPULATION & SAMPLE 43 3.9.1 Population 43 3.9.2 Sample .43 3.10 DATA ANALYSIS .45 3.11 DATA COLLECTION, EDITING & CODING 45 3.11.1 Data Collection 45 3.11.2 Data editing 47 3.11.3 Data coding 48 3.12 ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE RESEARCH .48 3.13 THE LIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH 49 3.14 QUALITY STANDARDS: VALIDITY & RELIABILITY 49 CHAPTER 51 DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 51 QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH THROUGH SURVEYS 51 4.1 RESPONDENTS PROFILE 52 4.1.1 Question 1: Out of the following three time periods, which one were you born in? 52 4.1.2 Question 2: What is your gender? 52 4.1.3 Question 3: What is your job classification? 54 4.1.4 Question 4: What is the highest level of education you have completed? 55 4.1.5 Question 5: Which one of the following would make you feel most motivated at work? 57 4.1.6 Question 6: Please rank below factors according to importance for you in the workplace with being the most important, and being least important 61 CHAPTER 69 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 69 5.1 5.2 5.3 CONCLUSION 69 IMPLICATIONS AND ADVICE FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 71 RECOMMENDATION FOR MANAGERS 72 CHAPTER 73 REFLECTION ON LEARNING AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT 73 6.1 6.2 LEARNING STYLE .73 SKILL AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT 77 APPENDICES 79 BIBLIOGRAPHY 85 List of figures: FIGURE THE LEARNING CYCLE (ADAPTED FROM KOLB, 2011) 11 FIGURE COMPARISON OF THREE GENERATIONS’ CHARACTERISTICS AND VIEWS OF WORK 21 FIGURE THE RESEARCH ‘ONION’ SOURCE: (SAUNDERS ET AL., 2009, P 108) .36 FIGURE RESEARCH CHOICES (SAUNDERS ET AL., 2009, P.152) 41 FIGURE RELATIVE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF LONGITUDINAL AND CROSS-SECTIONAL DESIGNS (MALHOTRA & BIRKS ET AL., 2006, P 77) 42 FIGURE TYPES OF SECONDARY DATA (SAUNDERS ET AL., 2009, P.259) 46 FIGURE RESPONDENTS GENDER BY GENERATION .52 FIGURE JOB CLASSIFICATION PER GENERATION 54 FIGURE HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION BY GENERATION 56 FIGURE 10 MAIN MOTIVATION GENERATIONAL BREAKDOWN .58 FIGURE 11 IMPORTANCE FACTORS BREAKDOWN BY GENERATION 63 FIGURE 12 KOLB’S LEARNING CYCLE 74 List of tables: TABLE NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS CLASSIFIED BY GENERATION 52 TABLE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS’ GENERATION AND GENDER 52 TABLE GENERATIONAL BREAKDOWN OF GENDER BY PERCENTAGE .53 TABLE BREAKDOWN OF JOB CLASSIFICATION PER GENERATION 54 TABLE PERCENTAGE OF JOB CLASSIFICATION PER GENERATION .54 TABLE HIGHEST EDUCATION ACHIEVED BY GENERATION 55 TABLE HIGHEST EDUCATION ACHIEVED BY GENERATION IN PERCENTAGE .55 TABLE MAIN MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS BREAKDOWN BY GENERATION 57 TABLE MAIN MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS BREAKDOWN BY GENERATION IN PERCENTAGE .57 TABLE 10 BABY BOOMERS IMPORTANCE SCALE IN NUMBERS 61 TABLE 11 BABY BOOMERS IMPORTANCE SCALE IN PERCENTAGE 61 TABLE 12 GENERATION X IMPORTANCE SCALE IN NUMBERS 61 TABLE 13 GENERATION X IMPORTANCE SCALE IN PERCENTAGE .62 TABLE 14 GENERATION Y IMPORTANCE SCALE BY NUMBERS 62 TABLE 15 GENERATION Y IMPORTANCE SCALE BY PERCENTAGE .62 TABLE 16 RESPONSIBILITIES: CROSS GENERATIONAL COMPARISON OF IMPORTANCE BY EACH COHORT 63 TABLE 17 COMPENSATION: CROSS GENERATIONAL COMPARISON OF IMPORTANCE BY EACH COHORT 64 TABLE 18 WORK ENVIRONMENT: CROSS GENERATIONAL COMPARISON OF IMPORTANCE BY EACH COHORT 65 TABLE 19 ADVANCEMENT POTENTIAL: CROSS GENERATIONAL COMPARISON OF IMPORTANCE BY EACH COHORT .66 TABLE 20 FREE TIME: CROSS GENERATIONAL COMPARISON OF IMPORTANCE BY EACH COHORT 68 Chapter Introduction Generational diversity has been a topic of much discussion, exploration, and debate among organisational scholars and researchers (Mhatre & Conger, 2011) Many studies have been undertaken in order to understand and make sense of differences between different generations which cannot be ignored It is not a current concept, many generations have been working together in the past, but today we are able to see and study the differences between them In today’s work and social organizations, it is quite common to find individuals who were born during different times, circumstances, and situations (Erickson, 2009) Most commonly there have three generations currently present in the workplace: Generation Baby Boomers, Generation X and most currently Generation Y, also known as Millennials As these various generations work side-by-side in the workplace, organizational behavior has changed to adapt to each generation Managers are dealing with the generations that have a unique work ethics when compared with each other (Kaifi, Nafei, Khabfar & Kaifi, 2012) What’s more exciting is that, “organizations and researches are now beginning to address issues related to generational differences that might have significant impact on leadership and success of an organization”(Salahuddin, 2010, p.1) With such understanding it becomes imperative to research and study generational differences in any workplace Personality of an individual is formed by the events experienced at their growth stage Therefore it is common that the communication style, values and expectations of the work cohorts will differ between generations (Glass, 2007) These differences showed the need for variety of needs and demands, which shaped organizational behavior and reward systems In today’s demanding and ever changing environment, organizations are realizing the importance of satisfied and well educated workforce Human resources became one of the key strategic functions in organizations, where key employee retention is an important factor Therefore, organizations must study and apply different motivational techniques tailored to needs of each generation in order to retain and attract best talent available Background of the topic Crumpacker & Crumparker (2007) highlighted that today’s workforce comprises of various age groups, ranging from twenties to sixties Because of that diversity, understanding of such varied workforce has become a priority for organisations in order to understand the challenges and opportunities created (Crumpacker & Crumpacker, 2007) The success of any organization largely depends on its employees Taylor 111 et al., (2006), points out that employee satisfaction is a closely related predictor of turnover, together with major categories of predictor variables, “one emphasizing job attitudes of satisfaction is perceived alternatives and job search behavior” (Mitchell et al., 2001) Bhatnagar (2008) explains that it is important for organizations to take an active role in identifying and cultivating their own people who have the capabilities and potential to become an effective leaders and “the most powerful talent management practices respond to an organization’s unique business and human capital context” (Franks et al., 2004) Employees job satisfaction promises to maintain low employee turnover therefore it is very important for the leaders of the organisations to address the subject and develop suitable motivational techniques This study will analyze three generations: Baby Boomers, Generation Y and Generation X and enquire for motivational differences and for levels of importance of these motivational factors, in an effort to determine which motivational factors are valued the most by each generation Knowledge of various importance levels assigned to each factor will allow for alteration of managerial techniques used to motivate employees in today’s Irish work environment making them more effective to all three generations Many Irish organizations are exposed to troublesome economy and human resources have become a major strategic component in keeping them afloat Therefore right motivational techniques, based on needs of each generation, will help to minimize staff turnover and help to retain best talent Gunnigle, Heraty & Morley (2011, p.137) explain that if motivational needs are met and satisfied, employees will be encouraged to work at high-performance levels High-performance levels are what can bring competitive advantage to an organization; it is the one factor that can make a difference between long-term success and a short-term victory or even failure Background of the researcher The researcher is a graduate in Business Management with specialization in Human Resource Management and currently completing her Master’s degree in Business and Administration with specialization in Human Resources During her professional career, the researcher noticed hat various groups of employees act and react differently to various managerial and motivational techniques posed by their peers Researcher herself belongs to generation Y and was trying to understand the way her managers, who belong to generation X, think, and noted reaction to same practice would differ between herself and her managers Whilst completing her MBA, researcher explored various differences between generations in the workplace in detail That knowledge brought an understanding to the topic and desire to make her own research on Irish population Researcher decided to present her findings in the form of dissertation Overall, it can be observed that researcher is very much interested in the topic, is qualified and psychologically prepared for conducting a research on the chosen topic 10 Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Johnson M., Johnson L (2011) Managing up the generational ladder Leader to Leader journal 60, 3438 [Online]Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ltl.466/abstract (Accessed April 2013) Johnson, P., & Clark, M (Eds.) (2006) SAGE Library in Business & Management: Business and management research methodologies (Vols 1-6) London: SAGE Publications Johnson, T (2007a), “Younger boss, older employee: get along on the job”, July [Online] Available at: ABC News.com (Accessed 16 June 2013) Johnson, T (2007b), “Generation gap creates office tension”, April [Online] Available at: ABC News.com (accessed 17 June 2013) Jorgensen B (2008) Baby Boomers, Gen-X and Gen-Y: Policy Implications for Defense Forces in the Modern Era Foresight 5, 4, 41-49 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Jurkiewicz, C L., & Brown, R G (1998) GenXers vs Boomers vs Matures: Generational comparisons of public employee motivation Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18, 18 –37 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: August 2013) Jurkiewicz, C.L (2000), “Generation X and the public employee”, Public Personnel Management, Vol 29 No 1, pp 55-74 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Kaifi A.B., Nafei A.W., Khanfar M N., Aifi M M (2012) A multi-generational workforce: managing and understanding millenialls International journal of business and management 7, 24 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R D (2008) Motivation: Past, present, and future New York, NY: Taylor Francis 95 Kapp, K.M (2007), “Tools and techniques for transferring know-how from boomers to gamers”, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Vol 26 No 5, pp 22-37 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Karp, H., Fuller, C and Sirias, D (2002), Bridging the Boomer Xer Gap, Davies-Black, Palo Alto, CA Keith Macky, Dianne Gardner, Stewart Forsyth, (2008) "Generational differences at work: introduction and overview", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol 23 Iss: 8, pp.857 – 861 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Kenneth P De Meuse, Kevin J Mlodzik, 2010 A second look at generational differences in the workforce: implications for HR and Talent management People & Strategy vol 33 issue Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Feb 2013) Ketan H Mhatre, Jay A Conger, 2011 Bridging the gap between gen X and gen Y – Lessons from authentic leadership Journal of leadership studies Vol 5, no Kim, H., Knight, D K., & Crutsinger, C (2009) Generation Y employees’ retail work experience: The mediating effect of job characteristics Journal of Business Research, 62, 548–556 Kodatt S (2009) I Understand "You": Leadership Preferences Within the Different Generations Northern State University/Our Lady of the Lake University, USA Proceedings of the European conference on management, leadership and governance 61-65 Kofman, B., &Eckler, K (2005) They are your future: Attracting and retaining Generation Y.Canadian Human Resource Reporter, 18(8), Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Kolb, A Y., Kolb, D A (2011) Kolb Learning Style Inventory 4.0 Boston MA: Hay Group Kolb, J A (1984) Experiential Learning experience as the source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 96 Kooij, D T A M., De Lange, A H., Jansen, P G., Kanfer, R., & Differs, J S E (2011) Age and workrelated motives: Results of a meta-analysis Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 197–225 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Kotler, P and Armstrong, G (2010) Principles of marketing 13th edn Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Kouloubandi, A., Jofreh, M., and Mahdavi, F (2012) 'Analysis the relationship between job stress, intrinsic motivation & employees creativity in Islamic Republic of Iran Railways Organization', Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 4(8), pp 39-53 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Kovach, K.A (1980), “Why motivational theories don’t work”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol 45 No 2, Spring, pp 54-9 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Kovach, K.A (1987), “What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers”, Business Horizons, Vol 30 No 5, September-October, pp 58-65 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: March 2013) Kowske J B., Rasch R., Wiley J (2010) Millenialls’ (lack of) attitude problem: an empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes Journal of business & psychology 25, 265-279 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: April 2013) Kumar, R (2005) Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners 2nd ed SAGE Publication Kupperschmidt, B R (2000) Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management The Health Care Manager, 19, 65–76 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Lancaster, L.C and Stillman, D (2002), When Generations Collide: Who They Are, Why They Clash How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work, HarperBusiness, New York, NY 97 Levy, L., Carroll, B., Francoeur, J and Logue, M (2005), “The generational mirage? A pilot study into the perceptions of leadership of Generations X and Y”, Hudson Global Resources, Sydney EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Locke, E A., & Latham, G P (2004) What should we about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century The Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403 [Online] Available at: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20159050?uid=3738744&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104057537617 (Accessed: January 2014) Loughlin, C., &Barling, J (2001).Young workers’ values, attitudes, and behaviours Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 543–558 [Online] Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/096317901167514/abstract (Accessed: 17 January 2014) Macon, M and Artley, J.B (2009), Can’t we all just get along? A Review of the challenges and opportunities in a multigenerational workforce International Journal of Business Research (6), pp 90-94 [Online] Available at: http://ehis.ebscohost.com [Accessed April 2013] Malhotra, N.K and Birks, D.F (2006) Marketing research : an applied approach 3rd European edn Harlow: Pearson Education Mannheim, K (1972) The problem of generations In P G Altbach & R S Laufer (Eds.), The New Pilgrims: Youth protest in transition (pp 101–138) New York, NY: David McKay Mark, N S., Philip, L., & Adrian, T 2009 Research Methods for Business Students 5th Edition England: Printise Hall Marston, C (2007), Motivating the “What’s in It for Me?” Workforce: Manage across the Generational Divide and Increase Profits, Wiley, New York, NY Martin, C (2005), “What managers need to know about Generation Y”, Industrial & Commercial Training, Vol 37 No 1, pp 39-44 Emerald Insight [Online] Accessed: July 2013) 98 Mason, J (2005), Qualitative Researching, 2nd ed., SAGE, London McDonald, K.S and Hite, L.M (2008), “The next generation of career success: implications for HRD”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol 10 No 1, pp 86-103 [Online] Available at: http://adh.sagepub.com/content/10/1/86.short (Accessed July 2013) McGinnis J (2011) Young and restless: generation Y in the nonprofit workforce Public Administration Quarterly 35, [Online] Available at: http://www.sp2.upenn.edu/docs/programs/npl/summer_fellows/McGinnis.pdf (Accessed Feb 2014) Md Aminl Islam, Te Wee Cheong, Dayang Hasliza Muhd Yusuf, Hazry Desa, 2011 A study on “generation Y” behaviors at workplace in Penang Australian journal of basic applied sciences (11):1802-1812 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Meier J., Austin F S., Crocker M (2010) Generation Y in the workforce: managerial challenges The journal of human resource and adult learning 6, [Online] available at: http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/8%20Justin%20Meier.pdf (Accessed July 2013) Melissa Wong, Elliroma Gardiner, Whitney Lang, Leah Coulon, (2008) "Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol 23 Iss: 8, pp.878 – 890 Emerald Insight [Online].( Accessed July 1013) Meriac P J., Woehr J D., Banister C Generational differences in work ethic: an examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts Journal of business & psychology 25, 315-324 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Meriac, John P., David J Woehr, Banister, Christina, 2010 Generational differences in work ethic: an examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts Journal of business & psychology 25:315-324 Emerald Insight [Online].( Accessed August 2013) Mhatre H K., Conger A J (2011) Bridging the gap between gen X and gen Y – Lessons from authentic leadership Journal of leadership studies 5, Emerald Insight [Online].( Accessed November 2013) 99 Mirvis, P.H and Hall, D.T (1994), “Psychological success and the boundary less career”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 15 No 4, pp 365-80 Emerald Insight [Online].( Accessed 17 Nov 2013) Mitchell, T R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., and Erez, M (2001), Why people stay: using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 44 (6), pp 1102 [Online] Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.318.8054&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed July 1013) Montana, P J., & Petit, F (2008) Motivating and managing generation x and y on the job while preparing for z: A market oriented approach Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6(8), 35-39 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: July 2013) Montana, P.J and Lenaghan, J.A (1999), “What motivates and matters most to Generations X and Y?”, Journal of Career Planning and Employment, Vol 59 No 4, pp 27-30 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Morton, I P (2002).Targeting Generation Y Public Relations Quarterly, 47(2), 46–48 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 20 August 2013) Myers, K K., & Sadaghiani, K (2010) Millennials in the workplace: A communication perceptive on Millennials’ organizational relationships and performance Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 225– 238 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Narelle Hess, Denise M Jepsen, (2009) "Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts", Career Development International, Vol 14 Iss: 3, pp.261 – 283 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Neil S (2010) Leveraging generational work styles to meet business objectives Information Management Journal 44, 28-33 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) 100 Ng, E S., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S T (2010) New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation Journal of Business & Psychology, 25(2), 281- 292 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Nicholson, N., Schuler, R., Van De Ven, A.H., Cooper, G and Argyris, C (Eds) (1995), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behaviour, Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, pp 330-9 Nikravan L (2011) ‘The gen Y workplace’ [Online] Available at: http://clomedia.com/articles/view/thegen-y-workplace (Accessed March 2013) Oblinger, D (2003) Boomers, Gen Xers, and millennials: Understanding the new students Educause Review, 38, 37–47 [Online] Available at: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0342.pdf (Accessed July 2013) Orb A., Eisenhauer L., Wynaden D (2001) Ethics in Qualitative Research Journal of nursing scholarship 93-96 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Palese, A., Pantali, G., & Saiani, L (2006) The management of a multigenerational nursing team with different qualifications The Health Care Manager, 25(2), 173–193 [Online] Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699333 (Accessed July 2013) Pathirage, CP, Amaratunga, RDG and Haigh, RP 2008, 'The role of philosophical context in the development of theory: Towards methodological pluralism' , The Built and Human Environment Review, (1) EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Po-Ju Chen, Youngsoo Choi, (2008) "Generational differences in work values: a study of hospitality management", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol 20 Iss: 6, pp.595 – 615 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Proserpio, L and Gioia, D.A (2007), “Teaching the virtual generation”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol No 1, pp 69-80 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) 101 Rai, A K (2008), The influence of management’s attitude towards internationalization of Indian Software Firms International MBA Dissertation, Dublin Business School Raimond, P (1993) Management Projects London: Chapman and Hall Reisenwitz H T., Iyer R (2009) Differences in generation X and generation Y: Implications for the organization and marketers Marketing Management Journal 19, 2, 91-103 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Remenyi D Williams, B Money A Swartz E, 1998, Doing Research in Business sand Management, Sage, London Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A & Swartz, E (2005) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Methods London, SAGE Publications Reynolds, L., Bush, E.C and Geist, R (2008), “The Gen Y imperative”, Communication World, Vol 25 No 3, pp 19-22 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Rhodes, S.R (1983), “Age-related differences in work attitudes and behaviour: a review and conceptual analysis”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 93 No 2, pp 328-67 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Dec 2013) Riley, M., Wood, R C., Clark, M A., Wilkie, E & Szivas, E (2003) Researching and Writing Dissertations in Business and Management London, Thomson Rowh, M (2007) Managing younger workers: Like it or not, even in the workplace, things go round and round in the circle game as a new generation moves to the forefront OfficeSolutions, 34(1), 29 [Online] Available at: http://business.highbeam.com/4403/article-1G1-159080113/managing-youngerworkers-like-not-even-workplace-things (Accessed: Dec 2013) 102 S W Ng, Linda Schweitzer, Sean T Lyons, Eddy., 2010 New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation Journal of business & psychology 25:281-292 [Online] Available at: http://www.academia.edu/1410939/New_generation_great_expectations_A_field_study_of_the_mille nnial_generation (Accessed Nov 2013) Salahudin M M (2010) Generational differences impact on leadership style and organizational success Journal of Diversity management 5, 2, 1-6 [Online] Available at: http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JDM/article/view/805 (Accessed Nov 2013) Saunders M., 2003, Research Methods for business students India: Pearson Education Saunders N S M., Lewis P., Thornhill A (2009) Research Methods for Business Students 5th Edition England: Prentice Hall Sayers, R (2007) The right staff from X to Y Library Management, 28(8/9), 474–487 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Sessa, V I., Deal, J J., Kabacoff, R., & Brown, H (2007) Generational differences in perceptions about leadership The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10, 47–74 [Online] Available at: http://gradworks.umi.com/35/44/3544180.html (Accessed: 14 Dec 2013) Shih, W., & Allen, M (2007) Working with generation-D: Adopting and adapting to cultural learning and change Library Management, 28(1/2), 89–100 Emerald Insight [Online] Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1585541&show=pdf& (Accessed: 14 Dec 2014) Short C J., Reeves T.C (2009) The graphic novel: A “cool” format for communicating to generation Y Business Communication Quarterly 72, 4, 414-430 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) 103 Shragay D, Tziner A (2011) The generational effect on the relationship between job involvement, work satisfaction and organisational citizenship behaviour Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones 27, 2, 143-157 [Online] Available at: http://www.copmadrid.org/webcopm/publicaciones/trabajo/tr2011v27n2a6.pdf (Accessed Dec 2013) Simon, E (2007), “China’s me generation”, Time, Vol 170 No 1, pp 32-7 [Online] Available at: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1675626,00.html (accessed Dec 2013) Sirias, D., Karp, H.B and Brotherton, T (2007), “Comparing the levels of individualism/collectivism between baby boomers and Generation X: implications for teamwork”, Managerial Research News, Vol 30 No 10, pp 749-61 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Smola K W., Sutton C D (2002) Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium Journal of Organizational Behaviour 23, 363-82 Society for Human Resource Management (2004), Generational Differences Survey Report, [Online] Available at: https://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Documents/Generational%20Differences%20Survey% 20Report.pdf (Accessed: 21 March 2013) Society for Human Resources Management (2010), 'Motivation in Today's Workplace: The Link to Performance' HR Magazine, 55 (7), pp 1-9 Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 18 March 2013) Stake E R (2010) Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work New York: The Guilford Press Steven H Appelbaum, Maria Serena, Barbara T Shapiro, (2004) "Generation X and the boomers: organizational myths and literary realities", Management Research News, Vol 27 Iss: 11/12, pp.1 – 28 Strauss, W and Howe, N (1991), Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069, William Morrow & Co, New York, NY 104 Sujansky, J (2002) The critical care and feeding of generation Y Workforce, 81(5), 15 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Sullivan S.E., Forret M.L., Carraher S.M., Mainiero L.A (2009) Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes Career Development International, Vol 14 No 3, 2009 pp 284-302 [Online] Available at: http://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/business-facultypubs/62/ (Accessed 13 Dec 2013) Susan P Eisner, 2005 Managing generation Y SAM advanced management journal Vol 70, Issue Taylor 111, L J., Murphy, B., and Price, W (2006), Galdratt’s thinking process applied to employee retention, Business Process Management Journal, Vol 12 (5), pp 640-70 Terjesen, S., Vinnicombe, S and Freeman, C (2007), “Attracting Generation Y graduates: organizational attributes, likelihood to apply and sex differences”, Career Development International, Vol 12 No 6, pp 504-22 [Online] Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1630835 (Accessed: Dec 2013) Tett, R P., & Burnett, D D (2003) A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Thau, R D., & Heflin, J S (Eds.) (1997) Generations apart: Xers vs Boomers vs the Elderly Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books Thomas E Bunton , Jeffrey L Brewer (2012) Discovering Workplace Motivators for the Millennial Generation of IT Employees Proceedings of the 1st Annual conference on Research in information technology Pages 13-18 New York, NY, USA [Online] Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2380795 (Accessed: June 2013) Timothy H Reisenwitz, Rajesh Iyer, 2009 Differences in generation X and generation Y: Implications for the organization and marketers Marketing Management Journal, volume 19, issue 2, pages 91-103 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 11 Nov 2013) 105 Trimble, D E (2006) Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover intention of missionaries Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 349–360 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 16 Nov 2013) Tulgan B (2011) Generation Y all grown up and now emerging as new leaders Journal of leadership studies 5, [Online] Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.20237/abstract (Accessed: June 2013) Twenge J M (2010) A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes Journal of business and Psychology 25, 201-210 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Twenge J.M (2000) The Age of Anxiety? Birth Cohort Change in Anxiety and Neuroticism:1952-1993 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, 6, 1007-21 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 21 Nov 2013) Twenge, J M., Campbell, S M., Hoffman, B J., & Lance, C E (2010) Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing Journal of Management, 36, 1117–1142 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 30 Nov 2013) Twenge, J M., Zhang, L., &Im, C (2004) It’s beyond my control: A cross-temporal meta analysis of increasing externality in locus of control, 1960–2002 Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 308–319 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Viorel, L., Aurel, M., Virgil, M and Stefania, P (2009) 'Employees motivation theories developed at an international level ', Annals Of The University Of Oradea, Economic 89 Science Series, 18 (4), pp 324328, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 19 March 2013) Vroom, V (1995), Work and Motivation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 106 Watson, T (1994), “Linking employee motivation and satisfaction to the bottom line”, CMA Magazine, Vol 68 No 3, April, p [Online] available at: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9410314251/linking-employee-motivation-satisfactionbottom-line (Accessed Oct 2013) Weingarten, R M (2009) Four generations, one workplace: A Gen X-Y staff nurse’s view of team building in the emergency department Journal of Emergency Nursing, 35, 27–30 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: April 2013) Wessler, R.L (1984), “The psychology of motivation”, Marketing Communications, May, pp 29-32 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: June 2013) Westerman, J.W and Yamamura, J.H (2007), “Generational preferences for work environment fit: effects and employee outcomes”, Career Development International, Vol 12 No 2, pp 150-61 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: August 2013) Whitney J G., Greenwood R A., Murphy E F (2009) Generational differences in the workpkace: Personal values, behaviors, and popular beliefs Journal of Diversity management 4, 1-8 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Wisker, G (2001) The Postgraduate Research Handbook: Succeed with your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD New York, Palgrave Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L (2008) Generational differences in personality and motivation Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 878–890 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: Nov 2013) Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J E (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work Academic Management Review, 28, 2, 179–201 EMERALD / EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 22 April 2013) Yang, S B., & Guy, M E (2006) GenXers versus Boomers: Work motivators and management 107 implications Public Performance and Management Review, 29, 267–284 EBSCOhost [Online] (Accessed: 16 Nov 2013) Yu, H.C., and Miller, P., 2003 The Generation Gap and Cultural Influence: A Taiwan Empirical Investigation, Cross Cultural Management, Vol 10 (1), 23-41 [Online] Available at: http://epubs.scu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=gcm_pubs (Accessed March 2013) Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B (2000) Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace New York, NY: American Management Association Zikmund, W G (2003) Business Research Methods 7th ed United States of America, Thomson 108 109 ... motivational differences and for levels of importance of these motivational factors, in an effort to determine which motivational factors are valued the most by each generation Knowledge of various. .. expectations of leadership, and desire for learning None of these studies addressed the issue of generational differences in motivation towards set motivational factors Interestingly, existing empirical. .. by examining whether there are generational differences in work motivation by testing for generational differences in response to five motivational factors Review of the available literature suggests

Ngày đăng: 26/04/2020, 22:01

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN