1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Summary of Economic Doctoral thesis: Corporate social responsibility, brand - customer relationship quality and switching brand intention in the consumer goods in Vietnam

26 74 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 26
Dung lượng 375,47 KB

Nội dung

Research theories CSR, brand identification (BI), brand relationship quality (BRQ), switching brand intention; verify differences in the influence of variables CSR, BI, BRQ on the switching brand intention; contribute a suggestion to brand managers, marketers in raising customer’s perception about CSR.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ TRAN NGUYEN KHANH HAI CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY,  BRAND – CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP  QUALITY AND SWITCHING BRAND  INTENTION IN THE CONSUMER GOODS IN  VIETNAM Major: Administrations Code: 9340101 SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC DOCTORAL THESIS  Ho Chi Minh City ­ 2019 The research was  completed at University of Economics  Ho Chi Minh Scientific   instructors:   Assoc   Prof   Ph.D   Nguyen   Quang  Thu Reviewer 1: ……………………………………   Reviewer 2: ………………………………   Reviewer 3: ……………………………………   The dissertation will be defended in front of thesis scoring  council at the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City  at …. hour …. day …. month …. year ….  The thesis can be found at the library: …… …………………………………………………………… PUBLISHED SCIENTIFIC WORKS Tran   Nguyen   Khanh   Hai   and   Nguyen   Quang   Thu,   2018.  The role of brand identification in the relationship between  corporate   social   responsibility   and   intent   to   transform  brand. Economic Studies. Vol 4 (479), pp.50 ­ 59 Nguyen   Quang  Thu   and  Tran  Nguyen  Khanh   Hai,   2018.  The   impact   of   brand   identification   on   brand   –   consumer  relationship quality and switching brand intention. External   Economics. Vol 103, pp.30 ­ 42 Tran   Nguyen   Khanh   Hai   and   Nguyen   Quang   Thu,   2018.  The   impact   of   corporate   social   responsibility  on   brand   –  customer relationship quality and brand switching intention  in Vietnam. Journal of Science. Vol 60, no 3, pp.106 ­ 119 Tran Nguyen Khanh Hai, 2018. Consumers’ perceptions of  corporate social reponsibiliy: A review of the literature and  discuss directions for future research  Journal of Finance   and Marketing Studies. Vol 46, pp.52­64 Tran   Nguyen   Khanh   Hai   and   Nguyen   Quang   Thu,   2018.  Corporate   social   responsibility,   brand   identification,   and  brand switching intention in Vietnam  Journal of Finance   and Marketing Studies. Vol 45, pp.52­64 Tran   Nguyen   Khanh   Hai   and   Nguyen   Quang   Thu,   2018.  Impact   of   corporate   social   responsibility   on   brand  identification and brand switching intention in Vietnam CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW 1.1   Research background In the highly competitive service sector, it is important that  service   providers   have   a  developing   differentiated   service  brands  to create a sustainable competitive advantage (Sreejesh  and Roy, 2015). In reality, recently researches have shown that  consumers   distinguish   the   brand   based   on   the   relationship  which   they   have   developed   Therefore,   it   is   essential   to  establish a relationship with customers through the marketing  strategy of the business (Veloutsou, 2015) To begin with, corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays  a pivotal role in the context of customer interest in CSR. The  power of a brand depends on what the customer has learned,  felt, seen and heard about the brand through their experience,  that   is,   depending   on   customers’   mind   (Hoeffler   and   Keller,  2002)   Therefore,   related   images   that   derived  from   CSR   can  influence the brand through customers’ reaction In addition, when customers are skeptical about the brand,  along   with   the   diminishing   value   of   traditional   media   in  branding, questions related to branding identification are more  important in brand management (Tuškej et al., 2013) To   evaluate   brand­customer   relationships,   the   brand  identification (BI) and brand relationship quality (BRQ) are key  factors (Lam et al., 2010; Bruhn et al., 2012; Kieu, 2016). BI is  known as "the key psychological foundation for the profound,   committed,   and   meaningful   relationships   that   marketers   increasingly desire to build with their customers" (Bhattacharya  and Sen, 2003, p. 76) can be a useful dimension to understand  the underlying mechanisms that explain the interaction between  the brand and the customer While it is rare research of switching brand intentions to  mention about the customers’ emotional, state of relationship  even though it has impacted on the switching (Lin, 2010) Kieu   (2016)   examined   the   relationship   between   brand­ customer   relationship   quality   and   other   relationship   structure  such   as   brand   trust,   brand   identification,   loyalty   Future  research may explore the prefix of brand identification because  it is not included in the theoretical model. In addition, as the  theory proposes other results of brand identification and brand­ customer relationship quality, such as brand switching (brand  name, Lam et al., 2010), Further research should also consider  the results of this relationship Thus, the exploration of customers’ perceptions about CSR  is based on the triple­bottom line theory (TBL) in the BRQ and  the result of this relationship is switching brand intention     is  not interested. Therefore,  the study identifies the relationship  between customers’ perception of CSR based on TBL theory  with BRQ and switching brand intention in the consumer goods  in Vietnam, namely supermarket service is necessary Especially   in   the   context   combination   of   TBL   theory,  social   identification   theory,   relationship   marketing   theory   to  build   the   relationship   between   CSR   concepts,   brand  identification,   substance   brand   relationship   ­   the   customer   is  still a gap Briefly, BRQ is interested in growing; so BI, BRQ, and the  impact of CSR on the switching brand intention in Vietnam is a  new study 1.2   Research objectives ­ Research theories: CSR, brand identification (BI), brand  relationship quality (BRQ), switching brand intention ­ Identify and measure the impact of CSR, BI, BRQ on the  switching brand intention; ­ Verify differences in the influence of variables: CSR, BI,  BRQ on the switching brand intention; ­ Contribute a suggestion to brand managers, marketers in  raising customer’s perception about CSR  1.3   Objects and scope of the research  The research objects  are CSR, brand identification, brand  relationship quality and switching brand intention Theoretical   scope:   This   thesis   focuses   on   CSR   and   its  results,   namely:   BI,   BRQ,   switching   brand   intention   in   the  consumer   goods   in   Vietnam   The   author   is   based   on   the  customer’s perception of the above concepts The   survey   scope:   The   study   conducted   a   survey   of  customers who regularly shop at the general retail supermarket  in Ho Chi Minh City, in the context of the consumer goods,  namely retail supermarkets Time frame: Its data were collected from 2014 to 2018 1.4  Research implications Theoretical significance: CSR   has   been   implemented   quite   a   lot   in   developed  countries,   but   in   developing   countries   it   is   still   quite   new.  Especially   in   Vietnam   with   specific   demographic  characteristics,   orientations   and   policies,   there   may   be  differences. The combination of these theories synthesized the  fundamental   theories:   sustainable   development,   TBL,   social  identification, relationship marketing and the concepts of CSR,  brand   identification,   brand   ­   customer   relationship   quality,  brand switching intention. This has contributed to the consumer  behavior theory system Practical significance: The research results show managers  and marketer in the field of retail supermarkets summarizing the  situation of customer awareness about CSR. Since then, they set  out suitable CSR plans, programs and actions to reduce their  intention to switch brands Research   also   helps   managers   and   marketers   understand  the   benefits   of   being   aware   of   CSR   by   customers   It   makes  customers increase trust, satisfaction, commitment and reduce  switching brand intention Research supports the viewpoint in developing economies,  businesses   should   invest   in   CSR   strategies   and   activities   to  enhance   brand   identification,   strengthen   brand­customer  relationship quality and reduce switching brand intention.  1.5   Structure of the thesis The  thesis   includes   five  chapters:   Chapter   1:   Overview;  Chapter   2:   Theoretical   Foundations   and   Research   Models;  Chapter 3: Research Methodology; Chapter 4: Research results  and Chapter 5: Conclusions CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND  RESEARCH MODELS 2.1   CSR theory The   TBL   theory   (triple­bottom   line   theory)   is   used   to  verify   and   reflect   the   effectiveness   of   businesses   in   three  factors:   economy,   environment   and   society   Accordingly,  corporate   must   ensure   both   economic,   social   benefits   and  environmental protection benefits.  2.2   Social identity theory Social identity is the person’s perception that he belongs  to   a   certain   social   group,   which   has   the   same   meaning   of  affection,   interests,   characteristics   and   values   with   himself  (Tajfel,   1972)   It   helps   to   predict   customers'   behaviors   and  ability to move through other groups based on their perceptions  of differences (Escalas, 2004) A   social   identity   theory   is   an   appropriate   approach   to  research   customers   and   brands;   so   many   researchers   have  proposed   a   consumer   social   identity­brand   model   that  illustrates   the   relationship   between   brand   and   customer;  between   customers   and   social   identity;   and   between   social  identity and branding (Nguyen et al., 2015). This combination  occurs   when   there   is   a   match   between   the   customer,   social  identity and the brand they own.  2.3   Relationship quality theory Crosby   et   al   (1990)   argue   that   the   quality   of   the  relationship is the customer's perception of trust and satisfaction  with the seller to reflect their positive relationship. Since then,  many   scientists   have   inherited   and   developed   based   on   this  definition   when   conducting   research   on   relationship   quality  (Bejou et al., 1996; Dorsch et al., 1998; Roberts et al., 2003;  Golicic, 2007) 2.4 Reasonable action theory Theory of Reasoned Action ­ TRA was first researched and  introduced by Fishbein ­ Ajzen in 1967, continued to be revised  and   supplemented   twice   in   1975   and   1987,   showing   that  consumption   trend   was   the   factor   best   guess   consumer  behavior The   author   has   studied   the   impacted   of   the   social  responsibility   to   switching   brand   intention   through   brand  identification and brand ­ customer relationship quality in the  perspective   of   customers;   so   only   focusing   on   customer’s  perception   about   corporate   social   responsibility,   the  relationship   between   awareness,   attitudes   and   behavioral  intentions. This is shown in figure 2.4 below: Figure 2.4: Compact theoretical behavior model (Source: Author's synthesis) 2.5   Research model 2.5.1 Research concepts CSR concept This thesis has inherited the CSR concept stated by Du et  al. (2011, page 1) “CSR is a company's commitment to maximize   10 the   economic,   social   and   environmental   long­term   benefit   through   activities,   business,   policies   and   resources"   for  research CSR   perception   of   customers   referred   to   CSR   is  customer’s perception about CSR. For a comprehensive study  of   CSR,   this   study   has   incorporated   many   components   in   a  multidimensional  approach based on sustainable development  theory   to   measure   CSR   through   three   responsible   issues:  economic, social, environment with CSR perspective according  to customers' perception Brand identification concept Brand identification is a person who realizes that he has  "the mentality associated with the fate of the group, sharing the   common destiny and experiencing the success and failure of the   brand" (Mael and Ashforth, 1992, p. 104­ 105). In this view,  brand   identification   is   a   sense   of   personal   similarity   with   a  social group Brand ­ customer relationship quality concept Quality   of   brand­customer   relationship   is   defined   as  "strength" and "depth" in brand­customer interaction (Smit et  al., 2007; Hudson et al., 2015). It increases when customers feel  the   brand's   program   meets   their   expectations   and   wants   to  continue to stick with it The   model   of   brand   commitment   seems   to   be   the   most  appropriate   framework   to   investigate   the   impact   of   both  cognitive components (trust, satisfaction) and affective (brand  12 Customers   stayed   with   brands   that   have   higher   brand  satisfaction and commitment (Şahin et al., 2011; Kokkiadi and  Blomme, 2013). Therefore, when customers were not satisfied,  the   risk   of   customers   switching   to   a   more   attractive   brand  becomes bigger (Gulamali and Persson, 2017). This showed that  the quality of the brand relationship was stronger; customer’s  trust, satisfaction and commitment with the brand was higher.  Since then, the hypothesis H1 has been as follows: H1:   Brand   ­   customer   relationship   quality   has   a   negative   impact on switching brand intention The   impact   of   brand   identification   on  brand   ­   customer  relationship quality, switching brand intention  Based   on   the   social   identification   theory   that   when  customers identified with the brand, they were ready to repeat  purchase (Tukeke et al., 2013) One   of   the   important   consumer   needs   was   the   self­ expression   and   improvement   of   their   image   At   the   time   of  buying the brand, they conveyed a specific image or social role.  They   tended   to   identify   themselves   with   reputable   brands,  because it increased their self­esteem and the need to belong to  the   group   (Tajfel   and   Turner,   1985)   Customers   switched   to  another brand with the aim of enhancing identification (Lam et  al.,   2010)   In   other   words,   brand   identification   would   make  customers feel more attached, consistent with the brand and the  intention to transform the brand to become rarer Research   by   Lam   et   al   (2010)   showed   that   brand  identification   define   the   viability   of   brand­customer  relationships 13 From the above arguments, author has hypotheses H2a and  H2b as follows: H2a: Brand identification has a negative impact on switching   brand intention H2b:   Brand   identification   has   a   positive   impact   on   brand   ­   customer relationship quality The   impact   of   CSR   on   switching   brand   intention,   brand­ customer relationship quality, brand identification Stanaland   et   al   (2011)   suggested   that   CSR   encourages  consumers   to   trust   the   brand   Garcia   de   los   Salmones   et   al.  (2005) pointed out that customer trust in a company's products  or   services   is   directly   affected   by   their   perception   of   CSR.  McDonald and Lai (2011) and Pérez and Rodríguez del Bosque  (2015) found a significant  positive relationship between CSR  and   customer   satisfaction   Besides,   CSR   also   affected   the  customer’s   commitment   (Inoue   et   al,   2017)   It   means,   when  customers   trusted   through   CSR,   they   tended   to   bind   more  brands,   switching   brand   intention   will   become   rare   and   the  brand ­ customer relationship quality will be strengthened The   attitude   of   customers   would   be   more   positive   for  businesses that perform CSR activities than for businesses that  do not  implement  CSR (Murray and Vogel,  1997) and when  planning or conducting purchases they based on CSR images of  businesses (Vlachos et al., 2009; Choi and Ng, 2011; Du et al,  2011). Obviously, CSR of enterprises affected the decision to  own customers' goods directly and indirectly through customer  identification with enterprises (Pérez et al, 2013). In this view,  many scholars have shown that CSR affects brand identification  14 (Lichtenstein et al., 2004; Marin et al., 2009; He et al., 2011,  Mobin   Fatma   et   al.,   2016)   From   the   above   analysis,   the  hypotheses H3a, H3b, H3c are set as follows: H3a: CSR has a negative impact on switching brand intention H3b:   CSR   has   a   positive   impact   on   of   brand   ­   customer   relationship quality H3c: CSR has a positive impact on brand identification Since   then,   the   author   has   proposed   the   research   model   as  follows: Figure 2.5: Recommended theoretical research model (Source: author) 15 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1   Research design The   study   was   conducted   in   two   steps:   preliminary  research and primary research.  Preliminary research was conducted by qualitative research  and quantitative research. Based on theoretical and hypothetical  frameworks developed in Chapter 2, with in­depth interviewing  techniques for exploration. Then, discussing  group to develop,  adjust   the   measurement   scale   in   accordance   with   the  characteristics of Vietnam. A quantitative preliminary research  was conducted by direct interviewing with 115 samples through  a detailed questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha reliability and  the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were used Primary study was conducted by quantitative method. It uses  direct interview technique with detailed questionnaire with   regular customers in the retail supermarket in Ho Chi Minh city.  It used convenience sampling with 507 samples. The collected  data was measured by the Cronbach alpha reliability and the  EFA. Then, analyzed the CFA to measure  all  the research,  measurement scales. Finally, the theoretical model and  hypotheses in the model were tested through the SEM,  Bootstrap models and multi – group analysis  3.2   Measurement  Measure of CSR The   CSR   used   in   this   study   is   a   second­order   concept  consisting  of   three  responsible  components:   economic,   social  and environmental. They were measured by 20 items based on  Alvarado­Herrera et al. (2017) and qualitative research results Table 3.1: Scale of CSR Cod e Economic responsibility Items Author 16 Ec1 Ec2 Ec3 Ec4 Ec5 Ec6 I believe brand X tries to maximize profits to  sustain business I   believe   brand   X   tries   to   build  solid  relations  with  its  customers  to  assure  its  long­term economic success I   believe   brand   X   tries   to   continuously  improve the  quality  of the  services that  they  offer I believe brand X tries to have  a  competitive  pricing policy I believe brand X tries to do  its  best  to  be  more productive I believe brand X tries to  organize   its   services:   security,   car,   fire  protection, hygiene to meet customer needs Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017)  Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) author   synthesized  from   discussion  group’s conclusion Social responsibility So1 So2 So3 So4 So5 So6 So7 So8 So9 I believe brand X tries to sponsor educational  programs I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  sponsor  public  health programs   I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  be  highly  committed to well­defined ethical principles I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  sponsor  cultural  programs I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  make  financial  donations to social causes I  believe  brand  X  tries  to  help  to  improve  quality of life in the local community I believe brand X tries to provide products  that meet food hygiene and safety standards,  quality assurance, provenance Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017)  Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017)  Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) author   synthesized  from   discussion  group’s conclusion author   synthesized  I believe brand X tries to create jobs for local  from   discussion  people group’ conclusion author   synthesized  I believe brand X tries to sponsor programs:  from   discussion  Vietnamese people use Vietnamese goods,  group’s conclusion gratitude.  Environmental responsibility En1 I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  sponsor  pro­ environmental programs Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) 17 En2 En3 En4 En5 I believe brand X tries to  allocate  resources  to  offer  services  compatible  with  the  environment I believe brand X tries to carry  out  programs  to reduce pollution I believe brand X tries to  recycle  its  waste  materials properly I   believe   brand   X   tries   to  use  only  the  necessary natural resources Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Alvarado­Herrera   et  al. (2017) Note: X is the supermarket brand name ((Source: Author's synthesis)) Measure of Brand identification Some   researchers   have   passed   the   Mael   and   Ashforth  (1992) initial organizational identification scales in the context  of the consumer goods brand (He and Li, 2011; Keh and Xie,  2009; Kuenzel and Halliday, 2008, 2010; Zhou et al., 2012) and  the results were good. The brand identification scale of 05 items  was based on the Mael and Ashforth (1992) scale and group  discussion results (table 3.2) Table 3.2: Scale of brand identification Cod e Bi1 Bi2 Bi3 Bi4 Bi5 Items When   someone   criticizes   brand   X,   it  feels   like   a   personal   insult   (no  happiness) I   am   very   interested   in   what   others  think about brand X Author Mael   and   Ashforth  (1992) Mael   and   Ashforth  (1992) Mael   and   Ashforth  X’s successes are my happiness (1992) When someone praises brand X, it feels  Mael   and   Ashforth  like a personal compliment (1992) author   synthesized  When I want to shop, I think of the brand  from   discussion  X group’ conclusion Note: X is the supermarket brand name (Source: Author's synthesis) 18 Measure of BRQ The   BRQ   scale   consists   of   three   components:   trust,  satisfaction and commitment. This conceptual scale is based on  the Nyffenegeer et al. (2015) and Lo et al. (2017) scales and was  revised after qualitative research (table 3.3) Table 3.3: Scale of BRQ Code Items Author Trust Tr1 I rely on brand X Tr2  X is an honest  brand Tr3  X is a safe brand Tr4 X acts in customers’ best interests X  group  makes  an  effort  to  know  its  Tr5 customers Satisfation I  am consistently satisfied  with my decision to  Sa1 fly with X Sa2  I am completely satisfied with X X  offers  exactly  what  I  expect  from  a  Sa3 supermarket Brand   X   always   create   sympathy   with  Sa4 customer:   giving   birthday   gifts,   Tet   gifts,  Commitment Co1 Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) Lo et al. (2017) Lo et al. (2017) Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) Nyffenegger   et  al. (2015) author  synthesized  Lo et al. (2017) I  am  emotionally attached to  the  hotel  group I  am  committed  to  the  relationship   with  Lo et al. (2017) brand X                                  Note: X is the supermarket brand name Co2 (Source: Author's synthesis) Measure of switching brand intention After   the   two   groups   discussed,   switching   brand  intention was measured by seven – point Likert on three  item   scales,   developed  by   Shin   et   at   (2008)   (see  Table  3.4) Table 3.4: Scale of switching brand intention 19 Cod e Sw1 Sw2 Sw3 Items Author I intend to switch supermarket Shin et al. (2008) Next   time,   I   shall   buy   in   another  Shin et al. (2008) supermarket I would not continue to buy at X  Shin et al. (2008) Note: X is the supermarket brand name (Source: Author's synthesis) 3.3   Measurement Validation Measuring reliability of the scale used the Cronbach alpha.  The results of the analysis showed that the scales of the research  concepts are reliable with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.6 and the item­  total correlation coefficient > 0.5 following the exclusion these  items scalers: Ec1, Ec6, Bi3, Bi4, So5, So9 The EFA outcomes showed that there are total eight factors  is extracted at 67.858> 60%, Eigenvalue = 1.093. This proves  that these scales will explains the research concepts. In other  words, the EFA model is appropriate and the research concepts  are of distinct value. The factor loadings of the items are in the  range of 0.583 to 0.911, all > 0.5, practical significance 20 CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS 4.1   Characteristics of samples Statistical sampling included 396 females, accounting for  78.1%;   111   males   accounted   for   21.9%   The   number   of  respondents aged 25­34 is the majority, 205 people make up  40.4%; Next is the group of people aged 35­44 with 105 people,  accounting for 20.7%. Most of them have college degrees 476  (93.9%)  In  terms  of  income,  the  prevailing  income  is  10­20  million VND / month, 181 people make up 37.5%; Next is from  5­10 million per month, 127 people make up 25%.  4.2   The reliability and exploratory factor analysis  Results of Cronbach's alpha analysis showed that 33 items  had the item – total correlation coeffiencey > 0.5 and a high  Cronbach's alpha coefficient > 0.6, ranging from 0.813 to 0.897.  So that, all 33 items of scales were tested the exploratory factor  analysis There   were   eight   factors   extracted   at   61.092>   60%,  Eigenvalue = 1.018. Thus, the concepts were well explained, or  in other words, the EFA model is appropriate and the research  concepts are worth distinguishing. The factor loadings of the  items were > 0.5, practical significance 4.3   Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) CFA   performed   in   the   following   order:   CFA   CSR  concept; CFA brand relationship quality concept; and CFA  the final measurement model. The results showed that the  scales   are   both   valid   and   relevant   to   the   market   statistics  (Table 4.1) 21 Table 4.1: The final measurement model testing Fact or Scaler CSR Economic al  responsib Social  responsib ility Environm ent  responsib Code The  reliabil ity General Average  Variance  Extracte Factor  Loading Agreeme nt Ec alpha 0.813 So 0.890 0.8904 0.5373 0.7327 Agreeme nt En 0.845 0.8444 0.5206 0.7212 Agreeme 0.862 0.8618 Brand Identification BRQ Number  observe d  Cronba variable ch  s Bi 0.8142 0.5229 0.7230 Agreeme nt 0.6755 0.8213 nt Agreement Trust Tr 0.896 0.8961 0.6334 0.7950 Agreeme nt Satisfacti on Sa 0.897 0.8973 0.6861 0.8280 Agreeme nt Commitm ent Co 0.881 0.8820 0.7892 0.8880 Agreeme nt 0.830 0.8313 Switching brand intention Sw 0.6217 0.7883  (Source: Research results) 4.4   Theoretical Model Testing Figure 4.1: SEM results (standardized) (Source: Research results) The   model   showed   in   Fig   4.1   with   484   degrees   of  freedom, in accordance with the set of survey data. Because,  it has a chi­square value = 667.378 (p = 0.000), Chi­square /  df   =   1.379     TLI   =   0.978,   CFI   =   0.980,   GFI   =   0.929   and  RMSEA   =   0.027   are   all   satisfactory   The   unnormalized  estimation   result   of   the   parameters   is   shown   in   Table   4.1.  With the value of p  Bi ate CSR SE CR P­value 0.901 0.063 14.356 0,000*** Bi ­> BRQ 0.198 0.059 3.343 0,000*** CSR ­> BRQ 0.171 0.076 2.241 0.025 Bi ­> Sw ­0.134 0.065 ­2.071 0.038 CSR ­> Sw ­0.451 0.084 ­5.347 0,000*** BRQ ­> Sw ­0.574 0.082 ­6.962 0,000*** Note: *** p

Ngày đăng: 08/01/2020, 15:01

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN