1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kinh Doanh - Tiếp Thị

Tailored wealth management exploring the cause and effect of financial success

191 43 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 191
Dung lượng 2,9 MB

Nội dung

Exploring the Cause and Effect of Financial Success Niall J Gannon Tailored Wealth Management Niall J. Gannon Tailored Wealth Management Exploring the Cause and Effect of Financial Success Niall J. Gannon The Gannon Group St Louis, MO, USA Information contained herein has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we not guarantee their accuracy or completeness The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or entities in which the author is in employment or association All opinions are subject to change without notice Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security Past performance is no guarantee of future results ISBN 978-3-319-99779-7    ISBN 978-3-319-99780-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99780-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018959110 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations Cover illustration © Piriya Photography / Moment / Getty Cover design by Tjaša Krivec This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland For Riley and Fiona Acknowledgments I offer gratitude to my editor, Tula Weis at Palgrave Macmillan, for believing in this project two years ago and for having the vision to help see it through I am grateful to my developmental editor, Ellen Coleman, for not only completing her task with skill but also bringing new perspective to my views on the central topics of the book Thank you to the families whom I have come to know and serve over the past 25 years for believing in me and offering a classy example of how to lead a well-lived life Thank you to my wife, Gretchen, and my two daughters, Riley and Fiona, for enduring my loud and aggressive typing style that echoed through our home on many a day and night over the past year I remain grateful to Pat Kearns for offering me an internship at Shearson Lehman Brothers in 1991 that has led to such a fulfilling career Thanks to Mark Bebensee from The Citadel and the late Sister Agnes Catherine Williams, OSU Thank you to colleagues and members of the CFA Institute for providing peer review on the Efficient Valuation Hypothesis, especially Brett Neubert, CFA.  Overwhelming thanks to Scott Seibert, CFA, who co-authored the Efficient Valuation Hypothesis whitepaper and agreed to update valuation formulas, graphs, and tables for inclusion in this work Thank you to the editors at Seeking Alpha, especially Mark Pentacoff, for highlighting our paper and agreeing to start a new debate in the financial services industry about the driver of portfolio returns over time Thanks to Charlotte Beyer, founder of the Institute for Private Investors and author of Wealth Management Unwrapped (Wiley, 2nd edition, 2017), for being so insistent that I continue to research ways to improve private investor outcomes vii viii Acknowledgments Thank you to Dr Aswath Damodaran, finance professor at New  York University, for making his historical models available in an open-sourced format upon which we built our models Thank you to Charlie Henneman of the CFA Institute, whose invitation to address the delegates of the 2008 CFA Annual Conference led to my first book, and the models and refinements that grew from it Thank you to the members of Tiger 21, the Family Office Exchange, the Institute for Private Investors, Campden Wealth, and the Portfolio Management Institute for allowing me to share my work with their members Thank you to His Holiness, Pope Francis, for helping me understand and act on ways to improve the human condition in the poorest parts of the world I maintain the ultimate level of respect and gratitude to Matt Rogers, Sarah Govreau, and Cindy Feaster for their dedication to the wealth management and family office profession Contents Part I The Landscape of Wealth Around the World    1 1 Introduction   3 2 Average Americans: Stories of “Ordinary” Success   7 3 Wealth: How Much Do You Need; How Much Is Enough  17 4 The Growth of American Wealth: Its Impact on the Average Household Compared with the Forbes 400  25 5 The Six Robbers of Wealth and How to Avoid Them  35 6 The Wealth Lifecycle: From Building It to Passing It On  45 Part II Technical Aspects of Tailored Wealth Management   55 7 The Efficient Valuation Hypothesis: The Long View  57 8 Asset Allocation: Choices and Challenges  65 9 Defining Moment: Your Objectives, Assumptions, and Other Factors Affecting Long-Term Returns  77 10 Taxation at the Top: Its Long-Term Effect on the Assets  93 ix x Contents 11 Portfolio Optimization: The Impact of Taxation, Turnover, and Time Horizon on Net Returns 111 12 Building Your Investment Team 127 13 Educational Resources for Investors 139 Part III Successful Spending, Philanthropy, Gifting and Estate Planning  147 14 Spending: How Much Is Too Much? 149 15 Philanthropy: What You Need to Know to Donate Wisely 157 16 Gifting and Estate Planning: Determining the Right Time to Transfer Wealth 173 17 Epilogue 181 Index183 List of Figures Fig 10.1 Fig 10.2 Fig 10.3 Fig 10.4 Fig 10.5 Fig 10.6 Fig 11.1 Fig 15.1 Fig 15.2 Top marginal tax bracket Top capital gains tax bracket Estate tax rates Historical estate tax rates versus dollar amounts Gift tax rates Historical gift tax rates versus dollar amounts Growth of $100 (1957–2017) Donor type in billions Donation beneficiaries 96 100 103 104 107 108 124 158 159 xi 176  N J Gannon Giving Now versus Giving Later The challenge becomes HOW and WHEN to give your heirs access to the money? Most people agree that handing a $5 million check to a 21-year-old is a bad idea Many would agree that forcing a trust to distribute income of $100,000 per year at age 21 (as many trusts do) can create a disincentive for the beneficiary to gain meaningful employment I gained valuable insight into this debate at a meeting of IPI in New York The interactive session was led by an estate tax attorney and a trust officer The moderators, requesting a show of hands, asked at what age a child could be given a large financial inheritance or trust distribution WITHOUT it disrupting their lives, career plans, choice of spouse, or character Age 30? A couple of hands went up Age 35? About five more hands Age 40? Eighty percent of the hands in the room went up This was a fascinating exercise as it was a poll taken among a group that had witnessed wealth transfers occur at a much earlier age and had seen firsthand the benefits and pitfalls that resulted While it is not a legal term, I have come to describe trusts terms that distribute everything at a certain age or year as a bullet trust Pros and Cons of Different Trusts Most trusts established for young beneficiaries contain language that keeps the assets held in trust up until specified ages, with the trustee having the discretion of making distributions for the health, welfare, and education of the beneficiary More liberally written documents include the word “lifestyle,” which I consider a dangerous addition The common trust also dictates that at age 21, income from the trust is to be distributed to the beneficiary In these cases, it is common to see two distributions of principal, such as 50% at age 30 and the remainder at age 35 or 40 The income mandate creates a situation where a $10 million trust could create $200,000 in dividend income, even more if the vehicle contained higher-yielding bonds The bullet trust contains neither an income mandate nor staggered distributions On a specified day, such as the 40th birthday of the beneficiary, the trust either makes a full distribution or makes the beneficiary a co-trustee in order to “learn the ropes”—in other words, how the trust is managed Proponents of the standard trust claim that since the child is going to live an upper-class lifestyle anyway, staggering the ages to 21, 30, and 35 gives them the opportunity to learn along the way so that when the trust terminates they will be experienced in managing a large financial asset There is merit to this claim   Gifting and Estate Planning: Determining the Right Time to Transfer…  177 Proponents of the bullet trust value something else: they believe that their children have the right to select their own career path, spouse, city of residence, and place of employment without the financial overlay of a trust, which most certainly will influence their decisions For this group of clients, I ask, at the time the trust is established, to write a letter to the beneficiary that can be delivered either verbally or in writing if the grantor has passed away The letter would read something like this: Dear son/daughter Happy 40th Birthday! When you were young, your father and I made a decision to forego a portion of our wealth for your benefit as you grew older We viewed it as planting a tree that was watered, fertilized, pruned, and protected so that it could grow into something wonderful for you at this stage of your life You have just turned 40 years old Your own children may be thinking about college Precious time on vacation with them will become rarer You may be considering what your own retirement will look like The tree has now come into bloom and we hope it will lighten that burden It may help you send them to a better school It may help you take a nice vacation It may allow you to retire a few years earlier It is now your choice, your tree, and your task to protect We did this because we love you and at the time we felt it was the wisest decision we could make Love, Mom and Dad This letter may sound completely ridiculous to some and wise in its simplicity to others The benefit of the bullet trust (and the accompanying letter) is that at all times in the beneficiary’s life, the trustee maintains the ability to use trust assets for the health and education of the beneficiary If the child gets into Harvard and the family is $50,000 short, the trustee can make up the gap Similarly, if a life-threatening illness strikes the child, the trust can be used for the very best care available What the trust will NOT fund are swimming pools, BMWs, hot tubs, or drug habits The right age for the “bloom” of the tree differs among families They generally select an age at which, they believe, the child will have self-actualized, when the financial benefit of the trust is more likely to help, rather than hurt, him There is a downside or criticism to this structure, which is that there are no training wheels since the distribution or co-trusteeship is a single event Families who choose this structure may have set up smaller Uniform Gifts to Minors Act accounts where their children take control, usually between the ages of 18 and 21, which allows them to learn how to manage their i­ nvestments, cash flow, and long-term goals It is critical that I point out that if you have failed to teach your children the lessons of saving, having a work ethic, and 178  N J Gannon delaying gratification (discussed in Part I), the bullet trust could still be damaging to them Nota bene: If you choose not to pursue a bullet trust structure, you and your advisor should model a list of scenarios as to what the trust might be worth when income is distributed or at the point(s) where a distribution of principal is authorized A $10 million trust in 2018 with a 2% yield could produce $200–300,000 in interest and dividends Only you, as the grantor, can make a determination as to whether this will help or harm your beneficiary Pros and Cons of a Simple Wealth Transfer What about a “traditional” inheritance that happens at the death of the senior generation? It’s been around for thousands of years of human history It still is one of the most popular wealth transfer vehicles even though many millions of dollars are squandered in estate taxes and lost opportunities Those who prefer to transfer assets at death likely share some thinking in common with the group who prefer bullet trusts They both want to refrain from financially meddling in the lives of their children Admittedly, many who choose a simple transfer at death so because it was too difficult for them to deal with the complexities of lifetime wealth transfer, literally ignoring the job One obvious drawback to the transfer at death model in our age of longer life expectancy is that one’s children might not inherit anything until they were in their late 60s or even 70s if one or both of the spouses see their 90s Choosing an Estate Plan That Fits Your Values There are many complex vehicles; among the most popular are family limited partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, charitable remainder trusts, charitable lead annuity trusts, and family insurance trusts It is critical for a couple not to become bogged down with the legal terms or the buffet of estate and gifting vehicles that are available to them Rather, they should spend their time discerning the issues of HOW, WHO, and WHEN on a long walk on the beach These determinations can and should take place over many discussions and be free of the complexities that bog down effective decision-making Once the couple has figured out what method fits their values, it is time to   Gifting and Estate Planning: Determining the Right Time to Transfer…  179 assemble their financial advisor, accountant, and estate planning attorney to discuss the roadmap A word of caution: If you jump into a plan too early and fund a vehicle before your values have been refined, it is difficult to put the genie back into the bottle Of course, the issue of philanthropy comes into play in estate planning For some, the existence of a defined philanthropic plan is the glue that brings the family together for a common purpose; to something worthwhile with a portion of the funds from the estate Billionaires who have signed the Giving Pledge are precise in how they practice this It is not uncommon for a billionaire to give $100 million each to his three children, and then bequest the remaining $700 million to a charitable foundation As such a donor sees it, nobody will miss any meals with a $100 million net worth and the act of stewarding the remaining $700 million for the greater good will give purpose to their lives and, for those who need it, will create a counterbalance to the guilt that some feel from being so lucky Maintaining Your Estate Plan An estate plan should be reviewed by your financial advisor and attorney every three to five years For younger families, reviewing the named guardian for minor children is an important consideration, especially as the children’s needs vary As they become older, an older named guardian’s ability to care for them may diminish, so it is important to ensure that you have selected the right person The second most important aspect of your estate plan is the naming of a successor trustee It is important that this individual possesses the skills, temperament, and age that will allow them to faithfully discharge their fiduciary duty on behalf of the beneficiaries While it may seem obvious, don’t neglect ensuring that your named trustee is willing to act in that capacity You may be surprised to learn how many grantors name a successor trustee without ever asking if they are willing to serve Another task that should be performed along with the three- to five-year review is to simply ensure that assets that are supposed to be titled in the name of the trust are correctly titled at the financial institutions that serve as your custodian It is not at all uncommon for families to go to the trouble of creating a well-thought-out estate plan and then failing to go through the steps of properly titling securities accounts, properties, and bank accounts 180  N J Gannon Before You Start, Make Sure You’re Clear The most important thing for a couple to consider is the cause and effect relationship their work and their financial success have had in their own lives and to make a financial plan that does not diminish or hinder the raw materials that drove that success and the pride of self-accomplishment Only once they have determined what feels right in their gut (including the ability for both spouses to explain in plain English what the purpose of the transfer is intended to accomplish) should they meet with their advisors to discuss strategy and ultimately determine a course of action This is yet another one of the complex decisions that must be made by families of means in which a slide rule or calculator has limited value 17 Epilogue Ron Read, the gas station attendant, was wealthier than gas company (Enron) CEO Ken Lay There was a cause and effect that led to Read’s rise and Lay’s fall We can become wealthier when we recognize our own circumstances on a global scale, then make choices to allocate resources and habits that can feed OUR definition of wealth—whatever that may be Managing wealth can be accomplished by filtering out the noise that has led to the complex portfolios that have failed investors over the past two decades Understanding the relationship between earnings and interest rates is key—remembering that success is always swayed by the price you pay for an asset The only investment performance that counts over time is that which exists after mistakes, inflation, taxes, and fees Composting or redistributing wealth is a necessary and healthy part of the financial ecosystem of our communities and our world A conscious plan for spending, philanthropy, and legacy for our heirs can and should be a rewarding exercise I love to hear when a meat cutter, teacher, or police officer say that they are wealthy—that they have enough Seek out those who smile as they maximize the resources of their life and situation and ask yourself whether wealth is within your grasp I believe that it is © The Author(s) 2019 N J Gannon, Tailored Wealth Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99780-3_17 181 Index1 A Adjusted gross income (AGI), 27, 28, 162 Affordable Care Act, 97 After-tax returns, 41, 57, 95, 102, 112–117, 120, 122, 125, 143 stocks vs bonds, 57 Amazon, 33, 34, 45, 140 American dream, 3, 11 Annualized return, 35, 42, 60, 62, 63, 78n2, 81, 116, 120–122 Annuities, 89, 90 Asset allocation, 3, 29, 38, 64–76, 78, 82–84, 111, 127, 128, 130–132, 141, 143 and do-it-yourself investor, 69–71, 74, 127–128 and mutual funds, 69 Assets, 3, 21, 22, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 38, 43, 44, 58, 59, 64–78, 81–84, 86–89, 93–109, 111, 125, 127, 128, 130–132, 134, 136–138, 140–144, 151, 152, 154, 162, 170, 175–179, 181 Assumptions, long-term, 41, 77–92 role of on objectives, 77–92 Average American household assets, 28, 29, 30, 84 Average American household income, 28, 29 impact on wealth of, 25–34 Average investor, 140 traits of, 69 B Balanced mutual fund(s), 43, 69, 72–73, 83 Balance sheet, 26, 28, 30, 31 Bear Stearns, 39 Beneficiary, 132, 134, 142, 156, 159, 176–179 letter to, 177 Benefits retirement, 27, 97 unemployment, 97 welfare, 97 Berkshire Hathaway Corporation, 32  Note: Page numbers followed by ‘n’ refer to notes © The Author(s) 2019 N J Gannon, Tailored Wealth Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99780-3 183 184 Index Bevard, Bishop Herbert, 160 Beyer, Charlotte, 57n1, 111, 130, 142, 143 Bezos, Jeffrey, 15, 29, 33, 34 Big Lots, 75, 128 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 167 Blum, Michael, 111 Bogle, Jack, 83 Bond buyer, 80, 118, 121–123 Bond Buyer Index of 20 Year General Obligation Bonds, 80, 121 Bonds agency, 26 corporate, 26, 66, 98 government, 66, 67, 98, 143 high-yield, 66 junk, 66, 143 municipal (munis), 26, 41, 80, 82, 86, 87, 98, 102, 122, 124, 143 tax exempt, 83, 92, 125 US Treasury, 26, 41, 77, 80, 86 Boutwell, George S., 95 Branson, Sir Richard, 161 Brunel, Jean, 57n1, 111 Budget, 13, 36, 76, 94, 99, 150, 152, 153 flexibility, importance of, 152 Buffett, Warren, 32, 37, 70, 90, 164 Burman, Leonard, 100, 101n10 Bush, George H.W., 97 Bush, George W., 97, 104, 120 Business ownership corporate equities, 26 equity in private businesses, 26 mutual fund shares, 26 BVI Unite campaign, 161 C CalPERS, 43, 69 Campden FB, 143 Campden Research Global Family Office Report (survey), 68 Capital gains tax long-term, 27, 99, 101, 118 short-term, 143 Carnegie, Andrew, 102 Carter, Jimmy, 99 Cave, Andrew, 158 Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA), 143 Certified public accountant (CPA), 127, 132, 135–136, 155 Charitable deduction, 162 Chief investment officer (CIO), 69, 71, 74, 127, 130–132 in-sourced, 130, 132 outsourced, 74, 130–132 Chronicle of Philanthropy, 136 Coca-Cola, 140 College endowment investors, 68 Common stocks, 37, 38 Congress, 94, 95, 97, 98, 100, 104, 109 Congressional Research Service, 103, 104 Consumer Price Index (CPI), 81, 82, 84, 85, 141 Copycat investors, 71–72 Cost of Living Extremely Well Index (CLEWI), 85 Currency trading, 66 Customs tax, 94 D Day-trading, 12, 39, 40 Debt, 3, 10–11, 25, 26, 98, 103, 142, 171 Dent, Harry, 140 Derivatives, 39, 89 Discounted present value, 26 Distributions, 23, 34, 80, 84, 89, 122, 150, 156, 176–178 of principal, 176, 178 Diversification, 67, 73, 83, 91, 130  Index  Dodd, David, 140 Dodge & Cox, 41, 43, 69, 72, 74, 83, 84 Dodge & Cox Balanced Fund (DODBX), 43, 69, 72, 83 Do-it-yourself investor, 69, 74–76, 82, 127–128 and asset allocation, 69–71, 75, 127 Donor-advised fund, 132, 136–137, 163 Dow Jones Industrial Average, 30, 33, 91, 140 Dual role manager, 74 Due diligence, 75, 129, 131 E Earnings, see Yield(s) Earnings/price (E/P) ratio, 33, 41, 59, 60, 67, 75, 77, 82, 112, 118, 128, 140 Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, 104 Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, 97 Education, 8, 20, 22, 46, 141–144, 163, 165, 174, 176, 177 Educational resources, 139–145 Efficient Valuation Hypothesis, 5, 57–64, 81, 81n4, 82, 111, 112, 145 Elliott Management Company, 70 Equity investor(s), 66 Equity portfolio, 30, 58, 66, 87, 111, 112, 117, 118, 121, 122, 124, 125 Equity risk premium, 42, 75, 82, 111, 112, 121, 127 Equity strategies, 66, 98 certificates of deposit (CDs), 98 commodity trading, 98 corporate bond, 98 hedge fund, 41, 81, 98, 99, 143 high turnover long term private, 41, 71, 98, 101 low turnover equity, 98, 102, 117 185 municipal bonds, 41, 98, 124, 143 tax efficient, 84, 98 tax inefficient, 98 US government bonds, 98 Estate plan, 43, 52, 105, 127, 132, 133, 138, 142, 155, 173–180 incorporating your values into, 178–179 Estate planning attorney, 127, 133, 179 Estate tax, 20, 52, 93, 102–109, 134, 175, 176, 178 European fixed income markets, 67 Evaluating the Line-up of New Investment Approaches to Follow Modern Portfolio Theory, 145 Excess return, 64, 84, 112 Exchange-traded fund (ETF), 131 Exclusions, 100, 101, 103, 105, 108, 109 estate tax, 103, 108, 109 gift tax, 108, 109 Exemption, 98, 103–106, 134, 175 estate tax, 104–106, 175 F Faculty tax, 94 Fama, Eugene, 59 “Random Walks in Stock-Market Prices,” 59 Family attorney, 49, 132–138 business, 134, 155, 160, 163, 165 foundation, 25, 52, 53, 132, 136–138, 157, 160, 163–165, 170 Family office executive director, 132, 136–138 internal administrative costs, 44 Family Office Exchange (FOX), 144 Family Performance Tracking™ survey, 68, 78, 78n2, 143 Federal poverty line, 17 186 Index Federal Reserve, 25–27, 25n1, 77, 78, 88, 88n6, 139 Federal Reserve “Survey of Consumer Finances” (SCF), 27 Fees impact on portfolios, 57 of investment managers, 33, 44 performance based, 44 Financial advisor, 74–76, 84, 127–132, 145, 179 Fixed income, 58, 64, 67, 70, 72, 74, 82–84, 86, 87, 89, 112, 125, 128, 140, 152 Forbes 400, 15, 18, 20, 25–34, 78, 80, 84, 85, 142 Forbes 2018 Billionaires list, 28 Ford, Henry, 164 Futures, 9, 25, 27, 35, 40, 43, 44, 47, 50, 58, 59, 64, 66, 77, 78, 81, 83, 86, 91, 99, 118, 120, 122, 135, 141, 144, 149, 151 managed, 83 Goals, 8, 11, 13–15, 19, 22, 23, 28, 31, 34, 48, 50, 67, 70, 71, 77, 85, 130, 144, 163, 177 setting of, 48 Gold, 42 Google, 75, 128, 129 Government bonds, 66, 67, 98, 143 Graham, Benjamin, 140 Great Boom Ahead, The, 87, 140 Great Depression, the, 95, 97, 104 Great recession, the, 39 Greenspan, Alan, 86, 139 “irrational exuberance,” 86, 139 H Hamilton, Sarah, 144 Healthcare directive, 133 Hedge funds, 18, 19, 39–41, 66–68, 70, 71, 80, 81, 83, 87, 98, 99, 105, 141, 143 returns of, 87 High yield bonds, 66, 67, 83 Hulbert, Mark, 67 Huntsman, Jon, 158, 159, 161 G Galbraith, John Kenneth, 139 Gallea, Tony, 50 Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, 23 Gates, William (Bill), 3, 29, 32, 34, 164 General Education Diploma (GED), 46 General Electric, 140 Gifting, 106, 108, 109, 133, 134, 165, 173–180 when to, 22 Given Pledge, The, 168–171 Giving Pledge, The, 3, 34, 51, 133, 169, 171, 179 Giving USA Report, 2017, 157, 159 Global Investment Portfolio Standards (GIPS), 84, 131 Global Rich List, 18 calculator, 18 I Inception yield, 58 Income, 9, 10, 17–19, 22, 23, 26–28, 31, 33, 34, 58, 64, 67, 70, 72, 74, 82–84, 86, 87, 89, 94–104, 109, 112, 117, 118, 121, 124, 125, 128, 140, 152, 160, 162, 168–171, 176, 178 median US family, 18 Income tax history of, 94, 112n2 practice of, 41, 84, 93, 135, 168 theory behind, 57 top marginal brackets, 95, 97, 99 Index funds, 33, 34, 40, 67, 71, 75, 76, 84, 89, 128, 129 strategies, 75, 128  Index  treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS), 42 Index of General Obligation Bonds, 80, 118, 121, 124 Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, 157 Individual investors, 3, 34, 58, 64, 69, 75, 125, 128 Inflation, 23, 26, 33, 35, 42–43, 64, 70, 71, 77, 78, 81, 82, 84–86, 92, 105, 120, 141, 151, 169, 181 Inflection points, 75, 87, 128, 132, 135, 137, 141 Institute for Private Investors (IPI), 78, 78n2, 80–84, 111, 130, 142–144, 176 Institute for Private Investors (IPI) Family Performance Tracking Survey, 68 Insurance broker/agent, 137 Interest income, 68, 70 Interest rate/earnings yield, 30, 32, 33, 36, 38, 39, 41, 58–60, 62–64, 70, 75, 77, 78, 81, 86–88, 112, 118, 120, 122, 124, 125, 129, 140, 181 Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 91, 95, 98, 108, 135, 136, 167 Investing strategies, 39, 42, 83, 85, 90, 163 Investment consultant, 69, 73, 85, 130–132 The Investment Group for Enhanced Results (TIGER) in the 21st Century, 144 Investments, 8, 10, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41–44, 47, 58, 59, 63, 65–75, 77, 78, 80, 84, 82, 85–90, 97, 98, 99, 100, 102, 106, 109, 112, 116–122, 127–144, 151, 153, 157, 169, 177, 181 long-term, 12, 44, 78, 88, 100, 116 187 J Jobs and Growth Tax Reconciliation Act of 2003, 98 Jones, Dennis, 7, 90, 163 Jones, Judy, 7, 90, 163 Jones Medical Industries, 90 Jones Pharma (JMED), 90, 163 Journal of Wealth Management, 111 Junk bonds, 67, 143 K Kates, Trevor, Kennedy, John F., 120 King Pharmaceuticals (KG), 90 Kobes, Deborah, 100 Kozlowski, Dennis, 156 L Lay, Ken, 19, 181 Lehman Brothers Holdings, 39 Leveraged buyout, 66 Liabilities, 25, 58, 64, 77, 109, 135–137 unfunded liabilities, 58, 64, 77 Lifestyle, 9, 10, 15, 19, 47, 49, 50, 82, 176 Livingston, JP, 8–10, 12 Living will, 133 balanced, 133 Long-term returns, factors affecting assumptions, 77–92 objectives, 77–92 other, 77–92 Luckey, John, 103, 104, 107 Ludwig, Daniel Keith, 32 M Madoff, Bernard, 70 Managed futures, 66, 68, 83 188 Index Marks, Howard, 141 Marston, Dick, 111, 143 McCauley, Phil (CFA), 174 Mean, 3, 26–28, 30, 31, 34, 37, 57–59, 64, 65, 82, 84, 152, 174 reversion to, 59 Median, 17, 26–28, 116, 120, 121, 136, 173 Median vs mean, 27, 28 Medicare, 97, 98, 102, 137 Millionaire Next Door, The, 140 Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), 145 Money habit, the, 8–10 Money manager, 73, 131, 132, 141 outsourced, 131 Morningstar Advisor Workstation, 122 Mortgage(s) interest on, 30 30 year fixed rate, 30 Most Important Thing, The, 141 Municipal bonds, 32, 41, 70, 80, 82, 86, 87, 98, 102, 112, 121, 122, 124, 125, 143 Mutual funds, 13, 26, 40, 41, 43, 69, 71–74, 83, 89, 116, 117, 122, 131 asset allocation, 69 See also by Name N Nasdaq, 71, 90, 102 National Association of College University Business Officers (NACUBO), 34, 44, 68, 69, 71, 78, 78n2, 80, 80n3, 82–84, 87, 141, 143 National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 59 Nebbitt, Raynard, 166 Nest egg, 8–11, 22, 23, 31, 169, 170 Net worth calculation of average, 26, 28, 29, 33 calculation of median, 26 New York Times, 140 O 100 Places to Take Your Kids Before They Grow Up, 174 Oaktree Capital Management, 141 Obama, Barack, 97 Old Navy, 152 Oracle of Omaha, see Buffett, Warren “Ordinary” success, 7–15 Outliers, 5, 14 P Pension plans, 4, 58 unfunded liabilities, 58, 64 Perot, Ross Sr., 32, 33 Pew, Howard, 164 Pfizer Inc., 91 Philanthropic plan, 3, 138, 179 mission statement, 171 Philanthropy altruistic, 51, 151 animal rights and welfare, 19 donors, 157–160, 162, 163, 166–168, 175, 179 education, 159, 163, 165, 174, 176, 177 environment, 160 faith-based (religious), 158–159 health, 159, 160, 177 human services, 159 international affairs (including for relief of non-US poverty), 160 manager, 133, 138 multipurpose foundations, 165 non-traditional channels, 166–167 public services (including parks, festivals, civic events, etc.), 160 social services, 163 Pitt, William, 94 triple assessment act of 1798, 94 Pollack Sheldon David, 96 Ponzi, Charles, 139 Portfolio management  Index  compounding, role of, 9, 36, 81, 124, 125 dividends, role of, 81, 116, 124, 153 drivers of long-term performance on, 30 forward forecasting, 4, 58–59, 81 framework for, impact of fees on returns, 33, 35, 43, 68, 87, 122 quality, role of in, 37, 66, 89 Portfolio return(s) annualized, 81, 82, 116–118, 120, 122 bonds vs equities, after tax impact on, 121–125 capital gains tax, impact of on, 99–102, 124 earnings yield, impact of on, 122 excess GDP growth, impact of on, 120 high turnover rates, impact of on, 41, 71, 117–118, 125 inflation, impact of on, 81, 82, 85 minimum expected, 58, 59, 62, 87 multiple expansions/contractions, impact of on, 120 net expected, 99 rolling, 59, 60, 112, 118, 122, 124, 125 state of residence, impact of on, 117 tax rate, impact of on, 81–82 time horizon, impact of on, 65, 88–90, 111–125 Portfolios, types of balanced global, 74, 128 diversified, 12, 43, 66, 67, 73, 77, 87, 89, 105, 134 equity, 30, 58, 66, 77, 87, 111, 112, 117, 118, 121, 122, 124, 125 institutional, 43, 71, 143 Poverty, 17, 18, 160, 165, 167 Precious metals trading, 66 Price/earning (P/E) ratio, 30, 33, 41, 49, 60, 66, 67, 75, 77, 81, 82, 86, 112, 118, 128, 140 189 over-valuation, 67 Private equity, 66, 68, 72, 81, 83, 98, 99, 141, 143, 154 Private wealth advisor, 131 Property tax, 94 Q Qualitative metrics book value, 75, 128 P/E ratios, 128 Quality, litmus test of, 66 Quantitative easing, 88 Quinnipiac University, 84 R Random walk, 59 theory of, 59 See also Fama, Eugene Reade, Ronald, 3, 11, 12, 15, 19, 23, 37, 151, 181 Reagan, Ronald, 97 Real estate, 25, 31, 32, 42, 68, 83, 88, 105, 133, 137, 143, 173 Remmer Ryczewic, Susan, 165 Retirement accounts 401k, 23, 42, 47, 88 Roth 401k, 35 Returns, see Portfolio return(s) Revenue Act of 1916, 103 Revenue Act of 1935, 105 Risk, 3, 13, 38, 39, 49, 58, 66–68, 70–72, 75, 80–85, 87, 89, 111, 128, 129, 131, 136–138, 143, 144, 153 equity premium, 42, 81, 82 Rockefeller, John D., 102 Roosevelt, Franklin, 97 Roosevelt, Theodore, 102, 103 “Man with the Muck-rake,” 103 State of the Union, 1906, 103 Russell 2000 Index of Small Capitalization Stocks, 67 190 Index S S&P 500 index, 33, 38, 57, 59, 70, 111, 116, 122, 124, 125 S&P 500 index fund, 34 Saint Louis Basilica, 161 Security Analysis, 140 Seibert, Scott B., CFA, 57, 57n2, 58, 111 Seligman, Edwin R.A., 94 Short History of Financial Euphoria, A, 139 Shoun, Stan, 46 Singer, Paul, 65n1, 70 Sixteenth Amendment, 95, 100, 103 Social security, 23, 26, 170 Social Security Act of 1935, 97 Social Security Administration, 23 Sonnenfeldt, Michael, 144 South Carolina v Baker, 98 Spesard, Jenna, 10, 11 Stanley, Thomas J., 140 St Louis Business Journal, “The End of the Danforth Foundation,” 164 Stocks common, 37, 38 international, 66 small capitalization, 66 Stocks for the Long Run, 40, 59, 87, 100 Successor trustee, 127, 179 Survey of college endowments, 68, 69, 71 Swensen, David, 71, 141 T Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, 97 Tax(es) capital gains, 27, 98–102, 109, 116, 118, 121 economic stress, impact of on, 96, 99 estate, 20, 52, 93, 102–109, 133, 134, 175, 176, 178 exempt bonds, 83, 92, 125 gift, 105, 107–109 history of, 93–99, 103, 107, 108 impact on portfolio returns, 81–82 income tax, 27, 94–104, 109, 117, 118, 121, 125 large budget deficits, impact of on, 99 long-term effect on the assets, 93–109 marginal brackets, 95, 97, 99 property, 94 triple-assessment, 94 Tax policy impact of politics on, 103 impact on revenue, 96 Tax Policy Center, 100 Tax Reform Act of 1976, 108, 109 Tax Reform Act of 1986, 97 Time horizon impact on decision to liquidate, 121 impact on investment strategy, 88–90, 98 as a predictor of investment results, 118–120 Tiny house movement, 11 Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS), 42 Triple assessment act of 1798, 94 T Rowe Price Tax Exempt Municipal Bond Fund, 122 Trump, Donald, 32, 33, 97, 104, 106 Trusts bullet (standard) trust, 176–178 charitable lead annuity trust (CLAT), 178 charitable remainder trust (CRT), 178 common trust income mandate, 176 simple wealth transfer, 178 Turnover rates, 116–118 impact of on after-tax returns, 117 Tyco, 156 U US Department of Health and Human Services, 17 poverty guidelines, 17 US Federal Reserve, 77  Index  US household net worth, 28, 29, 32–34, 78, 80, 84 US Supreme Court, 98 Unfunded liabilities of private pension plans, public pension plans, 58, 64 Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA) accounts, 177 Unit trusts, 89 V Valuation, 38, 60, 65–67, 73, 75, 78, 82, 102, 118, 128, 140, 175 Vanguard Wellington Fund (VWELX), 43, 69, 72, 83 Venture capital, 66, 83, 143 Virgin Atlantic, 161 Volatility, 31, 38, 65, 70, 74, 90 W Wall Street Journal, “When Philanthropy Goes Wrong,” 164 Wants vs needs, 10, 51 Wealth definitions of, 20–22 deployment of, effect, 31 growth of American, 25–34 ladder, 4, 21 lifecycle, 45–53 management of, 4, 19, 41, 45, 57, 82, 127, 132, 134, 138, 140, 144, 149 measures of, 18–20 myths about, pillars of, redistribution (composting) of, 149 three pillars of, US household, 25, 26, 28 Wealth, building of age, role of in, 49, 50, 176 compounding effect, role of in, 191 confidence, role of in, 51 diligence, role of in, 169 discipline, role of in, downsizing, role of in, 48 expectations, role of in, 31 frugality, role of in, 45, 50 goal setting, role of in, 50 hard work, role of in, 15 lifestyle, role of in, 19, 50 planning, role of in, 133, 173 prioritization, role of in, 10 total commitment, 169 Wealth, identification, landscape of, Wealth, robbers of fees, 43–44 inflation, 42–43 late starts, 35–36 mistakes, 37–41 spending, 36 taxes, 41–42 Wharton Executive Education Center, 111 Wharton/IPI Private Wealth Management Program, 111 Work ethic, 14, 45, 177 World War I, 96, 100, 103 World War II, 11, 97 www.gofundme.com, 166 Y Yale University Endowment Report, 71, 141 Yield(s) beginning of period, impact on, 59, 63 earnings, 38, 39, 41, 58–60, 62–64, 77, 86–88, 120, 122 inception, 58 interest rate/earnings, 87 to maturity, 77, 86, 124 negative, 67, 89 relative, 66 .. .Tailored Wealth Management Niall J. Gannon Tailored Wealth Management Exploring the Cause and Effect of Financial Success Niall J. Gannon The Gannon Group St Louis,... success and how they did it Before I get to these tales of ordinary financial success, I want to share two observations that speak to the causes of success in young people and its effect on them... and appreciate the fact that they are living the life they because of what they received Not all inheritors of wealth display a level of gratitude and contentment Ironically, perceptions of wealth

Ngày đăng: 08/01/2020, 09:51

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN