Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 65 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
65
Dung lượng
1,31 MB
Nội dung
UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM ERASMUS UNVERSITY ROTTERDAM INSTITUTE OFSOCIAL STUDIES THE NETHERLANDS VIETNAM – THE NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS EFFECTSOFSOCIALCAPITALON SELFRATED LIFE-SATISFACTION AMONG RESIDENTS: EVIDENCEFROMVIETNAM By TRUONG NGOC ANH THU MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY, November 2016 UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM INSTITUTE OFSOCIAL STUDIES THE HAGUE THE NETHERLANDS VIETNAM - NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS EFFECTSOFSOCIALCAPITALON SELFRATED LIFE-SATISFACTION AMONG RESIDENTS: EVIDENCEFROMVIETNAM A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS By TRUONG NGOC ANH THU Academic Supervisor: Dr PHAM KHANH NAM HO CHI MINH CITY, November 2016 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the thesis “Effects ofsocialcapitalon self-rated lifesatisfaction among residents: evidencefrom Vietnam”, which is submitted to Vietnam – Netherlands Programme, is my original research work All of the contents which are not from my own work are cited carefully and clearly in this thesis I certified that the contents of this thesis have not been and are not being submitted for any other degrees This thesis was done under the supervision and guidance of Dr Pham Khanh Nam Any other contributions to this thesis are presented in the acknowledgement section Signature Truong Ngoc Anh Thu Ho Chi Minh City, 2016 In my capacity as the supervisor of this thesis, I certified that the statements above are true to the best of my knowledge Signature Dr Pham Khanh Nam Date: i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First, I would like to express my great appreciation and huge thanks to VNP Lecturer Team for their dedication and enthusiasm in teaching and guiding me in studying, giving me so much knowledge and inspiring me in my academic study as well as my career I am so thankful to all of them Second, I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr Pham Khanh Nam, my research supervisor, for his patient guidance and useful critiques of this research work I would also like to extend my thanks to all of my friends in VNP and VNP Staffs for their great support and helpful activities during my time in VNP Finally, I would not forget to send my deepest thanks to my family, my dear friends who always stand by me and encourages me to keep up with my study objectives I am so grateful to all of above people and many others that I could not name here Thank you very much for supporting me! ii ABSTRACT This dissertation provides an insight into the relationship between self-rated lifesatisfaction and social capital, controlling for some demographic and individual characteristics in rural Vietnam as well as tests the theoretical predictions of the socialcapital investment model from the data ofVietnam Access To Resources Household Survey in 2014 Socialcapital is measured as a multidimensional concept including social network, formal institution, cooperation and social trust The results are quite consistent with the predictions, which supports the theory about the socialcapital investment of Glaeser et al (2002) that people who have higher education would have more investment in their social capital, and being stable in the residence also contributes to their investment ofsocialcapital while relatively higher income affects their social network and trust negatively Finally, the association between age and formal institution follows the inverted U-shaped trend Using order probit model on data for 3415 households from twelve provinces in Vietnam, it is found out that there is a significantly positive relationship between socialcapital in forms ofsocial network, formal institution and cooperation and an individual’s subjective satisfaction However, trust, on the other hand, is examined to be insignificantly associated with a person’s self-rated satisfaction in this research Keywords: social capital, social network, cooperation, formal institution, social trust, happiness, life-satisfaction, order probit model, rural Vietnam iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND QUESTIONS 1.3 RESEARCH SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 1.4 THESIS STRUCTURE CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1.1 Concept ofsocialcapital 2.1.2 Model ofsocialcapital investment 2.1.3 Becker and Murphy (2000)’s theory on the relationship between socialcapital and life-satisfaction 2 PREVIOUS EMPIRICAL STUDIES CHAPTER 3: DATA AND METHODOLOGY 11 3.1 DATA 11 3.2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 11 3.2.1 Variable description 11 3.2.2 Econometric model 14 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 15 4.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 15 4.2 RESULTS OFSOCIALCAPITAL INVESTMENT MODEL 20 4.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIALCAPITAL AND SELF-RATED LIFESATISFACTION 24 4.4 ROBUSTNESS TESTS 36 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS 39 5.1 CONCLUSIONS 39 iv 5.1.1 Concluding remarks from the test of model ofsocialcapital investment 39 5.1.2 Concluding remarks from the estimations of relationship between socialcapital and subjective life-satisfaction 40 5.2 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 41 REFERENCES 44 APPENDIX A 48 APPENDIX B THE RESULTS OF ORDER PROBIT ESTIMATIONS 49 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Factor analysis ofsocialcapital 12 Table 2: Variable Description 13 Table 1: Descriptive statistics 16 Table 2: Correlation coefficients among key variables 18 Table 3: Regression of demographic variables onsocialcapital 23 Table 4: Results of estimations of the relationship between life-satisfaction and socialcapital 26 Table 5: Results of the test of the impact of relative income on the relationship between life-satisfaction and socialcapital 30 Table 6: Results of the test of the impact of children on the relationship between satisfaction and socialcapital 32 Table 7: Results of the test of the impact of the time of living in the same community on the relationship between satisfaction and socialcapital 34 Table 8: Results of estimations of the relationship between socialcapital and lifesatisfaction (robustness check) 37 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: The framework of the relationships amongsocial capital, other dependent variables and life-satisfaction 10 Figure 1: Average life-satisfaction in twelve provinces in 2014 17 Figure 2: The relationship between social network and life-satisfaction 19 Figure 3: The relationship between formal institution and life-satisfaction 19 Figure 4: The relationship between cooperation and life-satisfaction 20 Figure 5: The relationship between trust and life-satisfaction 20 vii knowledge to an individual as well as gives him or her chances to earn more skills, discover his or her strengths, and orient him/her in studying, working or in his or her life Furthermore, education may also improve an individual’s life in health, mindset, thus raising his or her life-satisfaction Making more money also helps to improve the quality oflife in health, living standard or increase the feeling of compliment and satisfaction In rural areas, many families give birth to many children so that they will have more work force in the family However, it is contrasted to their expectation, having more children brings them more poverty and difficulties, so that it then reduces their life-satisfaction Being sick and not able to perform normal activities decreases a person’s life-satisfaction too It is easy to understand that being unhealthy does not only affect a person’s physical status but also his or her mental and psychological one, contributing to his or her misery and dissatisfaction 5.2 POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Since socialcapital is positively associated with level of life-satisfaction, in order to increase the level of an individual’s life-satisfaction, it is advised to improve socialcapitalof an individual: Firstly, because education has a large impact onsocial capital, in order to improve the socialcapitalof an individual, it is suggested that the government shall be more focused on education It is encouraged that the government invests in the construction of schools and vocational training colleges which equip students with necessary knowledge and essential skills for their job and life Besides, the quality of teachers shall be more invested and improved so that the students can easily get more practical knowledge as well as well instructed in behaviors and ways of living or working It is said that not only does improving education help to increase the educational level of Vietnamese households, but also it generates the chances for local people to strengthen their socialcapital Furthermore, schools shall operate more clubs and activities for students to take part in, thus creating a good environment for them to build solid connections with their friends In addition to the benefits bringing to students themselves, those activities may also give their parents opportunities to know each other by attending parental meetings at school, cheering activities, thus widening their social relations and raising their socialcapital Secondly, it is very critical that after an individual graduating from university or colleges, he or she could find a job with a reasonable salary and good benefits The career 41 centers and universities, colleges shall play a more vital role in the process of introducing jobs to graduates Career centers, universities and colleges shall cooperate with each other to orient the career path to students as well as help them to connect with companies and enterprises so that students can find a suitable job Earning a good wage then helps to increase an individual’s socialcapital since he or she has money to hang out with friends, attend more activities and meetings Thirdly, the government shall invest more in the public organizations such as youth clubs, culture clubs as it seems that households can gain a good level ofsocialcapital at their young age in these activities Nowadays, people spend a lot of time watching television, using mobile phones or many other electronic devices instead of spending time for outdoor activities Hence, these organizations can offer people with the opportunities to meet each other, exchange their ideas and feelings so as to raise their intellect and awareness to social problems as well as tighten their solidarity Fourthly, settling down also contributes to level ofsocialcapital To raise social capital, it is advised that government supports to lend households money to encourage them to buy a convenient house or apartment in a good environment in order to settle down for a long time If people live in a community for a long time, they are likely to get familiar with the areas, be close to their friends, and neighbors Therefore, they can have a large network of support which is difficult to gain if they are more mobile Moreover, highly mobile people feel less bonded to the other people at their living place, which may lead to more crime (DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E L, 1999) and less trust or cooperation (Halpern, 2001) finds that when people trust each other, the crime is lower while it is illustrated that people trust each other more when people are not highly mobile, which means the community is highly homogenous (Alesina, A and La Ferrara, E., 2000) As for other elements affecting life-satisfaction, health is one of characters which is strongly related with an individual’s life-satisfaction Since many households in rural areas not have habit of going to hospital when they are sick, local government may need to launch a campaign to educate people to go to see the doctors whenever they feel not well instead of staying at home or taking any herbal medicines Moreover, it is suggested that the local government encourages all of households to buy health insurance for all family members since it does help them a lot for hospital and medicine fees The infrastructure of health services and hospital as well as the qualified level of doctors and nurses shall also be 42 improved more More health centers and hospitals should be built so that households can easily get access to those places for treatment In addition to physical health, mental health may even affect more an individual’s level of life-satisfaction Besides some internal elements such as characteristics, psychological illness affecting mental health of an individual, other external ones can be improved by socialcapital such as network with friends, neighbors, strong sense of family values and ties or the freedom in spirit and beliefs As being found in the estimation results, the environment and people surrounding positively affect the feeling of life-satisfaction of an individual Therefore, local government shall encourage the maintenance of the relationship by commending and rewarding good families who are friendly and supportive in the community Also, all households are allowed to freely follow their own spiritual paths or religions and engage in any spiritual activities provided that those activities not violate the law Finally, in rural areas of Vietnam, people seem to have a wrong notion that having more children will help to increase the work force of the household, thus making more money However, it turns out that more kids will lead to the poverty and difficulties, thus decreasing the level of life-satisfaction of households For this reason, local government shall encourage the households not to give birth to many children Each couple shall have from one to two kids only depending on the condition of the family All people shall be asked to join woman’s clubs or other organizations to be educated about sex protection so as to avoid getting pregnancy which is out of control as well as to have a good reproductive health 43 REFERENCES Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E L (1999) Participation in heterogeneous communities (No w7155) National bureau of economic research Argyle, M., & Lu, L (1990) The happiness of extraverts Personality and individual differences, 11(10), 1011-1017 Becker, G S (81) Murphy KM (2000) Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment Bjørnskov, C (2003) The happy few: Cross–country evidenceonsocialcapital and lifesatisfaction Kyklos, 56(1), 3-16 Bjørnskov, C (2006) The multiple facets ofsocialcapital European journal of political economy, 22(1), 22-40 Bjørnskov, C (2008) Socialcapital and happiness in the United States Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(1), 43-62 Blanchflower, D G., & Oswald, A J (2008) Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social science & medicine, 66(8), 1733-1749 Borgonovi, F (2008) Doing well by doing good The relationship between formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness Social science & medicine, 66(11), 2321-2334 Chang, W C (2009) Socialcapital and subjective happiness in Taiwan International Journal ofSocial Economics, 36(8), 844-868 Crandall, J E (1980) Adler's concept ofsocial interest: Theory, measurement, and implications for adjustment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 481 Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M (1993) The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195-223 Diener, E (1994) Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities Social indicators research, 31(2), 103-157 Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R E., & Smith, H L (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302 Diener, E., & Lucas, R E (2000) Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 41-78 44 Diener, E., & Seligman, M E (2002) Very happy people Psychological science, 13(1), 81-84 DiPasquale, D., & Glaeser, E L (1999) Incentives and social capital: are homeowners better citizens? Journal of urban Economics, 45(2), 354-384 Glaeser, E L., Laibson, D., & Sacerdote, B (2002) An economic approach to social capital* The Economic Journal, 112(483), F437-F458 Frey, B S., & Stutzer, A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic literature, 40(2), 402-435 Frey, B S., & Stutzer, A (2010) Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being Princeton University Press Gundelach, P., & Kreiner, S (2004) Happiness and lifesatisfaction in advanced European countries Cross-cultural research, 38(4), 359-386 Halpern, D (2001) Moral Values, Social Trust and Inequality Can Values Explain Crime? British Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 236-251 Helliwell, J F (2003) How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331-360 Helliwell, J F., & Putnam, R D (2004) The social context of well-being Philosophical transactions-royal society of London series B biological sciences, 1435-1446 Helliwell, J F (2006) WellBeing, SocialCapital and Public Policy: What's New?* The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34-C45 Helliwell, J F., & Barrington-Leigh, C P (2010) How much is socialcapital worth? (No w16025) National Bureau of Economic Research Hickey, G C (1964) Village in Vietnam American Behavioral Scientist,8(3), 27-29 Hudson, J (2006) Institutional trust and subjective well‐being across the EU Kyklos, 59(1), 43-62 Karen Jeffrey, Hanna Wheatley & Saamah Abdallah (2016) The Happy Planet Index 2016: A global index of sustainable well-being Retrieved from happyplanetindex.org: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5735c421e321402778ee0ce9/t/57e0052d440243730f df03f3/1474299185121/Briefing+paper+-+HPI+2016.pdf Kozma, A., & Stones, M J (1983) Predictors of happiness Journal of Gerontology, 38(5), 626-628 45 Krishna, A., & Shrader, E (2000) Cross-cultural measures ofsocial capital: a tool and results from India and Panama Socialcapital initiative working paper, 21 Lelkes, O (2006) Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 285-307 Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R (2013) Searching for happiness: The importance ofsocialcapital In The exploration of happiness (pp 247-267) Springer Netherlands Lu, L., & Argyle, M (1991) Happiness and cooperation Personality and Individual Differences, 12(10), 1019-1030 Miller, E., & Buys, L (2008) The impact ofsocialcapitalon residential wateraffecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community Society and Natural Resources, 21(3), 244-257 Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., Aro, H., Alanen, E., & Hyyppä, M T (2010) Socialcapital as a determinant of self-rated health and psychological well-being International Journal of Public Health, 55(6), 531-542 Paxton, P (1999) Is socialcapital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment American Journal of sociology, 105(1), 88-127 Peasgood, T (2007) Does talking to our neighbours enhance our satisfaction with life In meeting of the International Conference of Policies for Happiness, Siena, Certosa di Pontignano (Vol 24) Perneger, T V., Hudelson, P M., & Bovier, P A (2004) Health and happiness in young Swiss adults Quality ofLife Research, 13(1), 171-178 Pichler, F (2006) Subjective quality oflifeof young Europeans Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 419-444 Powdthavee, N (2008) Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys oflifesatisfaction to value social relationships The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459-1480 Putnam, R (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of community in America Simon and Schuster, New York, 389, 378-390 Ram, R (2010) Socialcapital and happiness: Additional cross-country evidence Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4), 409-418 Rodríguez-Pose, A., & von Berlepsch, V (2014) Socialcapital and individual 46 happiness in Europe Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 357-386 Uslaner, E M (1999) Democracy and socialcapital Democracy and trust, 121-150 Yamamura, E (2011) Different effectsofsocialcapitalon health status among residents: Evidencefrom modern Japan The Journal of Socio-Economics,40(5), 475-479 Yip, W., Subramanian, S V., Mitchell, A D., Lee, D T., Wang, J., & Kawachi, I (2007) Does socialcapital enhance health and well-being? Evidencefrom rural China Social science & medicine, 64(1), 35-49 47 APPENDIX A Table A.1 Level of life-satisfaction in rural Vietnam Hà Tây Đak Lak Đak Nơng Điện Biên Khánh Hòa Lai Châu Lâm Đồng Lào Cai Long An Nghệ An Phú Thọ Quảng Nam TOTAL Not at all pleased Not very pleased Rather pleased Very pleased Average lifesatisfaction 7.41% 7.54% 6.06% 10.57% 2.00% 4.05% 1.37% 1.38% 7.64% 3.90% 16.05% 12.42% 7.73% 36.71% 46.96% 44.70% 58.49% 38.00% 80.41% 34.25% 55.86% 50.64% 67.80% 51.84% 45.15% 51.10% 49.55% 43.48% 46.97% 30.94% 56.00% 15.54% 54.79% 42.07% 32.80% 27.80% 28.68% 37.58% 37.69% 6.33% 2.03% 2.27% 0.00% 4.00% 0.00% 9.59% 0.69% 8.92% 0.49% 3.42% 4.85% 3.48% 1.547920434 1.4 1.454545455 1.203773585 1.62 1.114864865 1.726027397 1.420689655 1.429936306 1.248780488 1.194736842 1.348484848 1.369253294 48 APPENDIX B THE RESULTS OF ORDER PROBIT ESTIMATIONS Figure B.1 Marginal effectsofsocial network and life-satisfaction at the level “rather satisfied” and at mean of the number of friends 49 Figure B.2 Marginal effectsof formal association and life-satisfaction at the level “rather satisfied” and at one organization 50 Figure B.3 Marginal effectsof cooperation and life-satisfaction at the level “rather satisfied” and at cooperative level 51 Figure B.4 Marginal effectsof network and life-satisfaction at the level “rather satisfied”, the number of friends is and the relative income is 0.5 52 Table B.1 The result of regression of interaction term between sex and socialcapital and life-satisfaction VARIABLES SatisfactionSatisfactionSatisfactionSatisfaction Network Sex & network 0.0307*** (0.00922) -0.00820 (0.0101) Formal network 0.143** (0.0565) -0.0965 (0.0635) Sex & formal network Cooperation 0.147 (0.105) -0.0480 (0.118) Sex & cooperation Trust Sex & trust shortvocational longvocational specializedschool college university master married widowed divorced separated sex age agesquare illdays -0.0290 (0.0582) -0.00644 (0.139) 0.337*** (0.0960) 0.459*** (0.172) 0.668*** (0.147) 0.262 (0.803) 0.193 (0.213) -0.188 (0.218) -0.174 (0.261) -0.586 (0.508) 0.0878 (0.0850) 0.0108 (0.00889) -2.34e-05 (8.05e-05) -0.00218*** -0.00635 (0.0580) 0.0238 (0.138) 0.345*** (0.0962) 0.415** (0.172) 0.711*** (0.147) 0.227 (0.803) 0.207 (0.213) -0.168 (0.218) -0.176 (0.261) -0.662 (0.508) 0.129 (0.0891) 0.0102 (0.00891) -2.61e-05 (8.05e-05) -0.00224*** 53 -0.00262 (0.0580) 0.0101 (0.138) 0.357*** (0.0959) 0.446*** (0.172) 0.730*** (0.147) 0.260 (0.803) 0.229 (0.213) -0.169 (0.218) -0.170 (0.261) -0.624 (0.507) 0.0551 (0.0756) 0.0125 (0.00889) -3.90e-05 (8.06e-05) -0.00228*** -0.108 (0.118) 0.0537 (0.136) -0.00599 (0.0580) 0.0135 (0.138) 0.360*** (0.0959) 0.446*** (0.172) 0.741*** (0.147) 0.219 (0.802) 0.233 (0.213) -0.168 (0.218) -0.158 (0.261) -0.577 (0.507) 0.00133 (0.135) 0.0114 (0.00888) -2.87e-05 (8.05e-05) -0.00226*** (0.000542) (0.000542) (0.000541) (0.000541) -0.0316** -0.0313** -0.0335** -0.0339** (0.0153) (0.0153) (0.0153) (0.0153) totalincome -5.92e-09 -4.07e-09 -3.50e-09 -4.16e-09 (6.10e-09) (6.13e-09) (6.16e-09) (6.14e-09) relativeincome 0.257*** 0.246*** 0.241*** 0.246*** (0.0523) (0.0524) (0.0526) (0.0525) yearsliving 0.00169 0.00146 0.00172 0.00176 (0.00164) (0.00164) (0.00164) (0.00164) averagesatisfaction 1.818*** 1.869*** 1.833*** 1.840*** (0.139) (0.139) (0.139) (0.139) Constant cut1 1.877*** 1.915*** 1.869*** 1.735*** (0.364) (0.365) (0.362) (0.377) Constant cut2 3.681*** 3.710*** 3.662*** 3.526*** (0.367) (0.368) (0.365) (0.380) Constant cut3 5.464*** 5.481*** 5.434*** 5.298*** (0.373) (0.374) (0.371) (0.385) Observations 3,415 3,415 3,415 3,415 Standard errors in parentheses *** p