Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 80 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
80
Dung lượng
1,28 MB
Nội dung
UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES THE HAGUE THE NETHERLANDS VIETNAM - NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DEMOGRAPHICFACTORSANDECONOMIC GROWTH: THE BI-DIRECTIONAL CAUSALITYINSOUTHEASTASIA BY VO TAN THANH DIEP MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY, November 2015 UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS HO CHI MINH CITY VIETNAM INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL STUDIES THE HAGUE THE NETHERLANDS VIETNAM - NETHERLANDS PROGRAMME FOR M.A IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DEMOGRAPHICFACTORSANDECONOMIC GROWTH: THE BI-DIRECTIONAL CAUSALITYINSOUTHEASTASIA A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS By VO TAN THANH DIEP Academic Supervisor: PROFESSOR NGUYEN TRONG HOAI HO CHI MINH CITY, December 2015 i DECLARATION “I certify the content of this dissertation has not already been submitted for any degree and is not being currently submitted for any other degrees I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, any help received in preparing this dissertation and all source used, have been acknowledged in this dissertation.” Signature Vo Tan Thanh Diep Date: ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Nguyen Trong Hoai for his professional knowledge, perceptive guidance and for giving me valuable opportunities His guidance really helped me for the direction of the research and writing of this thesis In addition my advisor, I would like acknowledge the love from my family to me over the last 24 years A special thank is to my parents for their support throughout my life, to my sister and my relation in Ho Chi Minh City for valuable support during my studies Furthermore, I would also like to thank all lecturers and staff at the Vietnam Netherlands Program and my VNP 20 classmates Most of all, a special thanks go to my better haft – Nguyen Son Kien - for the motivation, encouragement and affectionate care that he bring to my life iii ABSTRACT This study has demonstrated new evidence sustaining the idea that variation indemographicfactors is an important determinant of growthin per capita income Using an annual panel dataset from 1990 to 2013 at the country-level inthe Southeast Asia, this study is conducted to analyze the following key areas in comparing with current literature First, the determination of the impact of a number of thedemographicfactors on theeconomicgrowth by using a various aspect of demographic factors, including: population growth, life expectancy, and age structure Second, the interpretation of the bi-directional causality among: (i) the population growthandtheeconomic growth; and (ii) the life expectancy andtheeconomicgrowth Furthermore, the two new econometric techniques, Driscoll and Kraay estimation, and structural equation model, in parallel with the panel regression technique are applied It is noticeable about the following key contribution, including: (i) the specification of the various aspects of demographicfactors on theeconomicgrowth is analyzed inthe new context (Southeast Asia) where most countries have experienced thedemographic transition, and have received thedemographic dividend; and (ii) the worth analysis of the bi-directional causality has been recognized since it is one of the first in its line of current literature that confirms the inverse effect of theeconomicgrowth on population growth, and life expectancy simultaneously Key words: Demographic transition, economic growth, population growth, life expectancy, age structure, Southeast Asia, Panel data, SEM iv TABLE OF CONTENT Declaration ii Acknowledgement iii Abstract iv Table of content v List of tables viii List of figures ix Chapter Introduction 1.1 Problem statement 1.2 Research objective 1.3 Research questions 1.4 Research scope 1.5 Thesis structure Chapter Literature review 2.1 Theoretical literature 2.1.1 2.1.1.1 Demographicfactors 2.1.1.2 Demographic Transition 2.1.2 Demographicfactorsandeconomicgrowth 2.1.2.1 The perspective of Malthusian Regime 2.1.2.2 The perspective of Post-Malthusian 10 2.1.2.3 The perspective of Modern Growth Regime 11 2.1.3 2.2 Key concepts Demographic transition andeconomicgrowth 13 2.1.3.1 The labor supply mechanism 13 2.1.3.2 The savings mechanism 14 2.1.3.3 The Human capital mechanism 14 Empirical studies 15 2.2.1 Population growthand age structure 15 2.2.2 Life expectancy 18 2.2.3 Bi-directional causality 19 2.2.4 Determinants of economic growth, population growth, and life expectancy 20 2.2.4.1 Economicgrowth 20 2.2.4.2 Population growth 21 2.2.4.3 Life expectancy 21 v 2.3 Hypothesis construction and conceptual framework 22 2.3.1 Hypothesis construction 22 2.3.1.1 Demographicfactorsandeconomicgrowth 22 2.3.1.2 Two-way relationship 24 2.3.2 Conceptual framework 25 Chapter Research methodology 27 3.1 Data 27 3.2 Model specification 29 3.2.1 Model specification for one way effects 29 3.2.2 Model specification for the bi-directional causality 30 3.3 Research methodology 32 3.3.1 Models of panel data regression 32 3.3.1.1 The model of Pooled regression 32 3.3.1.2 The model of fixed effects estimation 32 3.3.1.3 The model of random effects estimation 34 3.3.1.4 Driscoll and Kraay standard errors and panel models 34 3.3.2 The structural equation model (SEM) 36 3.3.2.1 The causal effect and mediate mechanism 36 3.3.2.2 The simultaneous (non-recursive) structural equation model 37 3.3.2.3 The logic of SEM 39 Chapter 4: Empirical results 40 4.1 Overviews of demographic transition in Southeast Asian 40 4.2 Data description 42 4.2.1 Descriptive statistic 42 4.2.2 The possible relationship by scatter 44 4.2.3 Correlation 45 4.2.4 Demographicfactors by deciles 46 4.3 Panel data regression 47 4.3.1 Diagnostic analysis 47 4.3.2 One-way direction - Driscoll and Kraay estimation 49 4.4 The bi-directional causality estimation 52 Chapter Conclusions and policy implication 56 5.1 Concluding remarks 56 5.2 Policy implication 58 vi 5.3 The limitation and directions for further research 61 Reference 62 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1: Variable descriptions 28 Table 4.1: Summary statistic .43 Table 4.2: Pairwise correlations 45 Table 4.3: Demographic variables by GDP per capita deciles 46 Table 4.4: Variance inflation factor (VIF) 47 Table 4.5: Model comparison .48 Table 4.6: Diagnostic problem 48 Table 4.7: Panel regression 51 Table 4.8: SEM regression 54 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Life Cycle Income and Consumption Figure 2.2: The process of demographic transition and population growth Figure 2.3: Population growthand food supply Figure 2.4: Population growthandeconomic growth, in period of 1300-2000 10 Figure 2.5: The exogenous growth model 12 Figure 2.6: The endogenous growth model 13 Figure 2.7: Conceptual framework .26 Figure 3.1: The causal effect and mediate mechanism 37 Figure 3.2: The non-recursive mechanism 38 Figure 3.3: The logic of SEM .39 Figure 4.1: Demographicfactors during the period of 1960-2013 .41 Figure 4.2: The orientation of age structure in Southeast Asian countries 41 Figure 4.3: The population pyramids in Southeast Asia .42 Figure 4.4: Relationship between economicgrowthanddemographicfactors 44 ix CHAPTER CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY IMPLICATION 5.1 Concluding remarks Using an annual panel dataset from 1990 to 2013 at the country-level inthe Southeast Asia (classified by United Nations, 2015), this study is conducted to analyze the following key areas in comparing with current literature First, the determination of the impact of a number of thedemographicfactors on theeconomicgrowth by using a various aspect of demographic factors, including: population growth, life expectancy, and age structure Second, the interpretation of the bi-directional causality among: (i) the population growthandtheeconomic growth; and (ii) the life expectancy andtheeconomicgrowth Furthermore, the two new econometric techniques, Driscoll and Kraay estimation, and structural equation model, in parallel with the panel regression technique are applied Moreover, the noticeable contribution of this study are: (i) the specification of the various aspects of demographicfactors on theeconomicgrowth is analyzed inthe new context (Southeast Asia) where most countries have experienced thedemographic transition, and have received thedemographic dividend (Bloom and Finlay, 2009); and (ii) the worth analysis of the bi-directional causality has recognized since it is the first one in its line of current literature that confirms the inverse effect of theeconomicgrowth on population growth, and life expectancy simultaneously Findings from this study provides the empirical evidence of significant effect on theeconomicgrowth from the three key following areas First, there is the positive effect of the population growth which is consistent with the empirical results from Azomahou and Mishra (2008) and Bloom and Williamson (1998) Second, the life expectancy presents a substantial boost to the economy which is verified inthe papers of Barro and Lee, (1994); Gallup and Sachs, (2000); and Ashraf et al., (2008) Third, the significant results of age structure are presented, including: (i) the negative effect dependence population (proxied by population 0_14, and population 65) andthe dependence working-age structure (proxied by dependence young, and dependence old); and (ii) the positive effect of working age P a g e | 56 population (proxied by population 15_64) The former is quite compatible with Bloom et al (2010) in negative effect of both young and old dependence on short-term growth, while the later has been confirmed inthe argument of Crenshaw et al., (1997), and Azomahou and Mishra (2008) that the improvement in participation rate of labor force would directly lead to a raise ineconomicgrowth These finding could infer that the old population is becoming a pressure in Southeast Asiain future unless the government don’t make a suitable pension policy and health care system In addition, this study has demonstrated the significant inverse effects of theeconomicgrowth on the two following demographicfactors First, the negative effect of GDP per capita on the population growth are present which is reflected by the impact of different population policy control inthe Southeast Asia Second, the GDP per capita affects positively on the life expectancy In general, these findings have filled the gap of current literature by confirms the significant presence of the bi-directional causality between thedemographicfactors (population growth, and life expectancy) andtheeconomicgrowth P a g e | 57 5.2 Policy implication From the conclusion remarks, it is evident that the variation in population factors, for instance population growth, age structure, and life expectancy, clearly related to economicgrowth process in Southeast Asia during the two recent decades Therefore, this section will provide some key policies and programs which related to demographicfactorsand their impact on economicgrowth Population growth Policy Since the population growth was the main subject of demographers for centuries, the policy on population growth have been concerned as an important policy in most of the countries in Southeast Asia According to World Population Policies Database (WPPD henceforth), it is clear that there was an effort of Southeast Asian governments to stabilize population growth Particularly, inthe low income countries such as Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Vietnam with the relatively high population growth, the governments have been applying the lower population growth policy in order to reduce pressures on national resources, and prepare for the employment and basic social services of all citizens On the contrary, the governments in higher income countries like Malaysia, Thailand have been satisfactory with their population growthand maintaining their population Moreover, the countries with highest income - Singapore – have been put effort into raising their population growth since the proportion of population over 65 in Singapore considerably rose by about 5% inthe period of 1990-2013 (1) The success of Singapore could reflect through the fact that its population growth have significantly improved in recent times Furthermore, Thailand and Malaysia should learn by experience of Singapore since there was a moderate reduction in their population growthand fraction of population under 15 during the past decade Besides, the low-income countries should consider the situation of Thailand or Malaysia to capture full benefit from demographic transition inthe next period In conclusion, the governments should observe the experience of other countries and concern different policies due to the stage of demographic transition in each countries P a g e | 58 Age structure Policy Nevertheless, the population growth itself could not provide the general picture of population status, hence the policymakers should concern more about the age structure as an important signal for the variation in population From the results of this study, the expansion of population, especially the working age group has undoubtedly accelerated thegrowth of GDP per capita in Southeast Asia during the past two decades However, the reduction inthe share of young people implies that these countries could face the shrink in working age population inthe future; hence it will depress economicgrowthinthe region Consequently, there could be certain tradeoffs between the cost for current population burden and future benefit from huge working age group, and policymakers should consider carefully these costs and benefits of in order to maintain the sustainable growthand ensure the benefit for the next generation Moreover, the inevitable consequences of the larger working age in present period is the aging population in future The dawn of this issue in Southeast Asian countries was marked by the increase inthe share of old people associated with the improvement in life expectancy As suggested by Bloom et al (2010), the negative impact of the increase in fraction of old population just exist in short run, yet not inthe long run However, Eggleston and Fuchs (2012) claimed the new demographic transition with the longevity could lead to a difficulty for policymakers to maintain the positive relationship between life expectancy and income per capita since almost the increase in life expectancy in recent times come from the decline in mortality of population over 65 As a results, the portion of working time to life expectancy will decrease, hence reduce the income per capita Indeed, the aging population could affect a large range of the economy, such as theeconomic performance, savings rate, employment, and health Although the proportion of population over 65 in Southeast Asia just increased by 1.6%, the negatively remarkable impact of this change on GDP per capita may reflect the incipient social security systems in this region Therefore, governments should adopt some measures to address this phenomenon and endeavor some policies to deal with the coming of an aging population inthe next period The sustainable pension system andthe improvement in statutory retirement age were some considered P a g e | 59 decisions that Southeast Asian government should endeavor to prepare for the potential risk from aging population Health Policy The pronounced contribution of health to economicgrowth process was confirmed by the significantly positive impact of life expectancy on GDP per capita in Southeast Asia On the other hand, the significant relatively small effect of output per capita on life expectancy may reflect the incipient health services in this area In order to preserve the positive impact of life expectancy on income per capita and prevent the pressure from aging population, the measures to improve life expectancy should more focus on the child and working-age health As suggested from SEM results, the developed immunization programs for children could be a direct method to improve health, hence the medical care for infants and children should be concerned as a paramount objective to increase the survival change of child to complete the working age Moreover, the evidence also suggest that the health of woman should be more concerned due to the fact that the participant of female have direct relation with population growthandthe lower fertility could lead to an increase in life expectancy Although there is an insignificant relationship between health and human capital in this study, education is still considered as an important factor in health development Particularly, the benefit from the increase in life expectancy could be maximized through the education system andthe educated people seem to be more healthy (Bloom et al., 2003) Therefore, the improved health program should consider the impact of education as the complementary method to capture the full benefit of human capital to income growth P a g e | 60 5.3 The limitation and directions for further research Although this study is conducted to analyze the various aspects of demographicfactors to theeconomic growth, there is several related issue should be considered inthe further research First, there could be a several elements can affect theeconomic growth, but these have not been presented in this study due to missing data problem Second, the time span in this study is over two decade, but it should be concerned in longer (some papers argued about 60 years) It means that there could be a case of nonlinear phenomena, or other effects of macro-factors, if the study can approach more data set Third, this study can consider a several new econometric technique, including: (i) nonparametric estimation; (ii) Var; or (iii) instrumental variables, to test and robust the study’s findings The emergence of analyzing demographicfactors to theeconomicgrowth is still a new interest field since there is new changing trend of demographic idiosyncrasy Therefore, the limitation can be understood in a way of looking forward to the broad vision in future research P a g e | 61 REFERENCE AbouZahr, C., & Royston, E (1991) Maternal mortality: a global factbook Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S (2007) Disease and Development: The Effect of Life Expectancy on EconomicGrowth Journal of Political Economy, 115(6) Adams, S J (2002) Educational attainment and health: Evidence from a sample of older adults Education Economics, 10(1), 97-109 Aguirre, D., Hoteit, L., Rupp, C., & Sabbagh, K (2012) Empowering the third billion: Women andthe world of work in 2012 Booz An, C B., & Jeon, S H (2006) Demographic change andeconomic growth: An inverted-U shape relationship Economics Letters, 92(3), 447-454 Ashraf, Q H., Lester, A., & Weil, D N (2008) When does improving health raise GDP? (No w14449) National Bureau of Economic Research Azomahou, T., & Mishra, T (2008) Age dynamics andeconomic growth: Revisiting the nexus in a nonparametric setting Economics Letters, 99(1), 67-71 Baltagi B H (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Wiley Barlow, R (1994) Population growthandeconomic growth: Some more correlations Population and Development Review, 153-165 Barro, R J., & Lee, J W (1994, June) Sources of economicgrowth InCarnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol 40, pp 1-46) North-Holland Barro, R (1996) Health andeconomicgrowth Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Bloom, D E., & Finlay, J E (2009) Demographic change andeconomicgrowthinAsia Asian Economic Policy Review, 4(1), 45-64 Bloom, D E., Canning, D., & Finlay, J E (2010) Population aging andeconomicgrowthinAsiaInTheEconomic Consequences of Demographic Change inEast Asia, NBER-EASE Volume 19 (pp 61-89) University of Chicago Press Bloom, D E., & Williamson, J G (1998) Demographic transitions andeconomic miracles in emerging AsiaThe World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419-455 Bloom, D E., Canning, D., & Malaney, P N (2000) Population dynamics andeconomicgrowthinAsia Population and Development Review, 257-290 Bloom, D E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J (2001) Economicgrowthandthedemographic transition (No w8685) National Bureau of Economic Research Bloom, D E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J (2004) The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach World development, 32(1), 1-13 P a g e | 62 Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J (2003) Thedemographic dividend: a new perspective on theeconomic consequences of population change Rand Corporation Boucekkine, R., De la Croix, D., & Licandro, O (2002) Vintage human capital, demographic trends, and endogenous growth Journal of Economic Theory,104(2), 340-375 Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., & Lefort, F (1996) Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics Journal of economic growth, 1(3), 363-389 Cervellati, M., & Sunde, U (2011) Life expectancy andeconomic growth: the role of thedemographic transition Journal of Economic Growth, 16(2), 99-133 Coale, A J., & Hoover, E M (1958) Population growthandeconomic development in lowincome countries: a case study of Indias prospects Crenshaw, E M., Ameen, A Z., & Christenson, M (1997) Population dynamics andeconomic development: Age-specific population growth rates andeconomicgrowthin developing countries, 1965 to 1990 American Sociological Review, 974-984 Cuberes, D., & Teignier, M (2014) Gender inequality andeconomic growth: a critical review Journal of International Development, 26(2), 260-276 Cutler, D M., Richardson, E., Keeler, T E., & Staiger, D (1997) Measuring the health of the US population Brookings papers on economic activity Microeconomics, 217-282 Dawson, J W (1998) Institutions, investment, and growth: New cross-country and panel data evidence Economic Inquiry, 36, 603-619 De la Croix, D., & Licandro, O (1999) Life expectancy and endogenous growth Economics Letters, 65(2), 255-263 De la Croix, D., Lindh, T., & Malmberg, B (2009) Demographic change andeconomicgrowthin Sweden: 1750–2050 Journal of Macroeconomics, 31(1), 132-148 Eggleston, K N., & Fuchs, V R (2012) The new demographic transition: most gains in life expectancy now realized late in life The journal of economic perspectives: a journal of the American Economic Association, 26(3), 137 Ehrlich, P (1970) The population bomb New York Times, 47 Fogel, R W (1994) Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: the bearing of longterm processes on the making of economic policy (No w4638) National Bureau of Economic Research Frankel, J A., & Romer, D (1999) Does trade cause growth? American economic review, 379399 Gallup, J L., & Sachs, J D (2001) Theeconomic burden of malaria The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 64(1 suppl), 85-96 Galor, O (2011) Unified growth theory Princeton University Press P a g e | 63 Galor, O., & Weil, D N (1996) The Gender Gap, Fertility, andGrowthThe American Economic Review, 86(3), 374-387 Goodfriend, M., & McDermott, J (1995) Early development The American Economic Review, 116-133 Greene, W.H (2012) Econometric analysis (Seventh ed.) England: Prentice Hall Gujarati D N., & Porter D C (2009) Basic Econometrics (5 ed.) McGraw-Hill Irwin Gylfason, T (1999) Principles of economicgrowth OUP Catalogue Halsey, N., & Galazka, A (1985) The efficacy of DPT and oral poliomyelitis immunization schedules initiated from birth to 12 weeks of age Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 63(6), 1151 Higgins, M (1998) Demography, national savings, and international capital flows International Economic Review, 343-369 Higgins, M., & Williamson, J G (1997) Age structure dynamics inAsiaand dependence on foreign capital Population and Development Review, 261-293 Hoechle, D (2007) Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence Stata Journal, 7(3), 281 Hoyle, R H (Ed.) (2012) Handbook of structural equation modeling New York: Guilford Press.Chapter 5, pp 68-91 Inter-American Development Bank, Facing up to Inequality in Latin America, Washington, D.C.: IDB, 1999 Jöreskog, K G., & Sörbom, D (1993) LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language Scientific Software International Kelley, A C., & Schmidt, R M (1995) Aggregate population andeconomicgrowth correlations: the role of the components of demographic change.Demography, 32(4), 543-555 Kelley, A C., & Schmidt, R M (1999) Economicanddemographic change: a synthesis of models, findings, and perspectives Kelley, A C., & Schmidt, R M (2005) Evolution of recent economic-demographic modeling: A synthesis Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 275-300 Kormendi, R C., & Meguire, P G (1985) Macroeconomic determinants of growth: cross-country evidence Journal of Monetary economics, 16(2), 141-163 Kuznets, S (1960) Population change and aggregate output InDemographicandeconomic change in developed countries (pp 324-351) Columbia University Press Lee, R (2003) Thedemographic transition: three centuries of fundamental change The journal of economic perspectives, 17(4), 167-190 P a g e | 64 Lee, R., Mason, A., & Miller, T (2000) Life cycle saving andthedemographic transition: The case of Taiwan Population and Development Review, 194-219 Liao, P J (2011) Does demographic change matter for growth? European Economic Review, 55(5), 659-677 Livi-Bacci, M (2012) A concise history of world population John Wiley & Sons Lutz, W., & Qiang, R (2002) Determinants of human population growth.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,357(1425), 1197-1210 Maddison, A (1982) Phases of capitalist development (pp 164-164) Oxford: Oxford University Press Maddison, A (2007) The world economy volume 1: A millennial perspective volume 2: Historical statistics Academic Foundation Malthus, T R (1798) An essay on the principle of population Oxford University Press (reprinted in 1993), Oxford Markus, K A (2012) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling by Rex B Kline Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 509-512 McDonald, S., & Roberts, J (2002) Growthand multiple forms of human capital in an augmented Solow model: a panel data investigation Economics letters,74(2), 271-276 Minh, N T (2009) Dynamic demographics andeconomicgrowthin Vietnam.Journal of theAsia Pacific Economy, 14(4), 389-398 Paxton, P., Hipp, J R., Marquart-Pyatt, S., & Marquart-Pyatt, S T (2011) Nonrecursive models: Endogeneity, reciprocal relationships, and feedback loops (Vol 168) SAGE Publications Poland, G A., Tosh, P., & Jacobson, R M (2005) Requiring influenza vaccination for health care workers: seven truths we must accept Vaccine,23(17), 2251-2255 Preston, S H (1975) The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development Population studies, 29(2), 231-248 Pugesek, B H., Tomer, A., & Von Eye, A (Eds.) (2003) Structural equation modeling: applications in ecological and evolutionary biology Cambridge University Press Qin, X., & Hsieh, C R (2014) Economicgrowthandthe geographic maldistribution of health care resources: Evidence from China, 1949-2010.China Economic Review, 31, 228-246 Ross, C E., & Wu, C L (1995) The links between education and health.American sociological review, 719-745 Sanderson, W C., Lutz, W., & Scherbov, S (2013) The End of World Population Growthinthe 21st Century: New Challenges for Human Capital Formation and Sustainable Development Routledge P a g e | 65 Sarafidis, V., & Wansbeek, T (2012) Cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis Econometric Reviews, 31(5), 483-531 Shaw, J W., Horrace, W C., & Vogel, R J (2005) The determinants of life expectancy: an analysis of the OECD health data Southern Economic Journal, 768-783 Sibly, R M., & Hone, J (2002) Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357(1425), 1153-1170 Soares, R R (2007) On the determinants of mortality reductions inthe developing world Population and Development Review, 33(2), 247-287 Solow, R M (1956) A contribution to the theory of economicgrowthThe quarterly journal of economics, 65-94 StataCorp 2013 Stata 13 Base Reference Manual College Station, TX: Stata Press Steinmann, G (1984) A model of the history of demographic-economic growthInEconomic Consequences of Population Change in Industrialized Countries(pp 29-49) Springer Berlin Heidelberg Trussell, J., & Pebley, A R (1984) The potential impact of changes in fertility on infant, child and maternal mortality Studies in family Planning, 267-280 Tsen, W H., & Furuoka, F (2005) The relationship between population andeconomicgrowthin Asian economies ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 314-330 United Nations Dept of Economic (2004) World population to 2300 (Vol 236) United Nations Publications UNFPA (2014) The Power of 1.8 Billion: Adolescents, Youth andthe Transformation of the Future United Nations (2013) World Population Ageing 2013 New York: United Nations United Nations (2015) World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision New York: United Nations Wei, Z., & Hao, R (2010) Demographic structure andeconomic growth: Evidence from China Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(4), 472-491 Wooldridge, J (2012) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach Cengage Learning P a g e | 66 APPENDIX Appendix A One-way regressions Model Regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors Method: Pooled OLS Group variable (i): id maximum lag: lngdp Coef pop_growth lnlife lnlifebase fe_ma trade gcf dum cl lndensitybase _cons 3457083 7.79809 3.875019 -.0030197 0061641 -.0189721 2915626 -.0930458 -.4473369 -38.7149 Drisc/Kraay Std Err .0911707 7691333 2799068 0025026 0007746 005366 1213419 0539855 0193406 2.974981 t 3.79 10.14 13.84 -1.21 7.96 -3.54 2.40 -1.72 -23.13 -13.01 Number of obs Number of groups F( 9, 9) Prob > F R-squared Root MSE P>|t| 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.258 0.000 0.006 0.040 0.119 0.000 0.000 Model P a g e | 67 = = = = = = 216 10 2117.67 0.0000 0.7809 0.6395 [95% Conf Interval] 1394658 6.05819 3.241826 -.0086809 0044119 -.0311109 0170682 -.2151696 -.4910884 -45.44477 5519508 9.537991 4.508212 0026415 0079164 -.0068334 566057 029078 -.4035853 -31.98502 Regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors Method: Pooled OLS Group variable (i): id maximum lag: lngdp Coef pop0_14 pop65 lnlifebase fe_ma trade gcf dum cl lndensitybase _cons -.1059098 -.5327396 4.088387 0063166 0099676 -.0092686 2849647 0027989 -.2961979 -2.416459 Drisc/Kraay Std Err .0058659 0783167 5048692 0053514 0004673 0055275 1468837 0267684 0454516 2.003408 t -18.06 -6.80 8.10 1.18 21.33 -1.68 1.94 0.10 -6.52 -1.21 Number of obs Number of groups F( 9, 9) Prob > F R-squared Root MSE P>|t| 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.268 0.000 0.128 0.084 0.919 0.000 0.258 = = = = = = 216 10 3441.87 0.0000 0.8232 0.5744 [95% Conf Interval] -.1191793 -.7099042 2.946294 -.0057891 0089105 -.0217725 -.0473094 -.0577553 -.3990167 -6.948483 -.0926403 -.355575 5.230481 0184224 0110248 0032354 6172387 0633531 -.1933791 2.115565 Model Regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors Method: Pooled OLS Group variable (i): id maximum lag: lngdp Coef depo_ratio depy_ratio lnlifebase fe_ma trade gcf dum cl lndensitybase _cons -.3219621 -.0221325 4.406163 0081531 0100834 -.0092869 427901 0112998 -.2839611 -6.419655 Drisc/Kraay Std Err .0468335 0018643 4914765 0050537 0005041 0055412 1223229 0225394 0428255 2.111333 t -6.87 -11.87 8.97 1.61 20.00 -1.68 3.50 0.50 -6.63 -3.04 Number of obs Number of groups F( 9, 9) Prob > F R-squared Root MSE P>|t| 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.141 0.000 0.128 0.007 0.628 0.000 0.014 Model P a g e | 68 = = = = = = 216 10 1933.93 0.0000 0.8269 0.5684 [95% Conf Interval] -.4279067 -.0263498 3.294366 -.003279 0089431 -.021822 1511873 -.0396879 -.3808391 -11.19582 -.2160174 -.0179152 5.51796 0195853 0112237 0032482 7046148 0622875 -.1870831 -1.643488 Regression with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors Method: Pooled OLS Group variable (i): id maximum lag: lngdp Coef pop15_64 lnlifebase fe_ma trade gcf dum cl lndensitybase _cons 0583743 4.891064 -.0141455 0093171 -.0173553 0848371 0570614 -.5056741 -12.81881 Drisc/Kraay Std Err .0126863 5201905 0028953 0004891 0056524 1761342 0589788 0319125 1.942476 t 4.60 9.40 -4.89 19.05 -3.07 0.48 0.97 -15.85 -6.60 Number of obs Number of groups F( 8, 9) Prob > F R-squared Root MSE P>|t| 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.013 0.642 0.359 0.000 0.000 216 10 453.65 0.0000 0.7400 0.6950 [95% Conf Interval] 0296758 3.714312 -.0206951 0082106 -.0301419 -.3136062 -.076358 -.5778651 -17.213 Appendix B Bi-directional causality regressions P a g e | 69 = = = = = = 0870728 6.067817 -.007596 0104236 -.0045687 4832805 1904808 -.4334831 -8.424625 Structural equation model Estimation method = ml Log likelihood = -4623.7497 Coef Number of obs OIM Std Err z P>|z| = 184 [95% Conf Interval] Structural lngdp