THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng | |
---|---|
Số trang | 414 |
Dung lượng | 14,46 MB |
Nội dung
Ngày đăng: 12/03/2018, 10:17
Nguồn tham khảo
Tài liệu tham khảo | Loại | Chi tiết |
---|---|---|
15. W3C: SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Accessed 01 Jan 2016 | Link | |
16. O ’ Connor, M.: SWRL language FAQ. ProtegeWiki. http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SWRLLanguageFAQ (2013) | Link | |
18. The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. http://protege.stanford.edu/Formal Acceptability of Digital Evidence 347 | Link | |
4. Cohen, F.: Challenges to Digital Forensic Evidence. ASP Press (2008) | Khác | |
5. Losavio, M., Adams, J., Rogers, M.: Gap analysis: judicial experience and perception of electronic evidence. Digit. Forensic Pract. 1(1), 13 – 17 (2006) | Khác | |
6. Mason, S.: Judges and technical evidence. In: The 2nd Internationa Conference on Cyberforensics Education and Training (2008) | Khác | |
7. Cosic, J.: Building an open framework for establishing and maintenance a chain of custody of digital evidence in forensic analysis of digital evidence. Doctoral Thesis, University of Zagreb (2014) | Khác | |
8. Zainudin, N.M., Merabti, M., Llewellyn-jones, D.: A digital forensic investigation model for online social networking (2010) | Khác | |
9. Kerr, O.S.: Computer Crime Law, 2d (American Casebook), 2 edn. West (2009) | Khác | |
10. Calhoun, M.C.: Scienti fi c evidence in court: Daubert or Frye. 15 years later. Leg.Backgrounder (2008) | Khác | |
11. Frakes, K., Rogers, M., Martin, S., Scarborough, C.: Survey of law enforcement perceptions regarding digital evidence. In: Advanced in Digital Forensics III, International Federation for Information Processing, Digital Library, vol. 242, pp. 41 – 52 (2007) | Khác | |
12. Insa, F.: The admissibility of electronic evidence in court (AEEC): fi ghting against high-tech crime — results of a European study. J. Digit. Forensic Pract. 1(4), 285 – 289 (2007) 13. Vujevic, M.: Uvo đ enje u znanstveni rad: u podru č ju dru š tvenih znanosti. Informator, Zagreb(1988) | Khác | |
14. Rada, D.: Measure and control of non-response in a mail survey. Eur. J. Mark. 39(1), 16 – 32 (2005) | Khác | |
17. Cosic, J., Ba č a, M.: Do we have full control over integrity in digital evidence life cycle? In:32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), 2010, pp. 429 – 434 (2010) | Khác |
TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG
TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN