HỘI NGHỊ KHCN TỒN QUỐC VỀ CƠ KHÍ - ĐỘNG LỰC NĂM 2017 Ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2017 Trường ĐH Bách Khoa - ĐHQG TP HCM INCREASINGTHEWORKINGEFFICIENCYOFABRASIVEGRAINSINMACHININGSKD11STEELBYUSINGNEWLYDEVELOPEDINCLINEDSEGMENTEDGRINDINGWHEEL Tien Dong Nguyen* Hanoi University of Science and Technology, No 1, Dai Co Viet, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi, Viet Nam ABSTRACT: In this paper, newlydevelopedinclinedsegmentedgrindingwheel (ISGW), which have segments on theworking surface; angle between these segments and a shaft ofgrinding machine β=15º, were used to grind SKD11steel which is popular material in mold making technology The percentage of discontinue on wheel surface symbolized by η, is defined as the ratio between the area does not containing abrasivegrains and the total area ofwheel surface Four ISGWs, with different percentage of discontinue η (16.37, 18.19, 20.01 and 21.83%) and a conventional wheel with η = 0% were used in experimental process The number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second , was calculated to evaluate theefficiencyofabrasivegrainsbywheel rotation speed, feeding speed and percentage of discontinue η Surface roughness of ground sample was employed When the number ofabrasive grain increase or the feeding speed S decrease, the surface roughness of surface ground by conventional grindingwheel decrease, but it obtained the same values byusing ISGWs It seems that the surface roughness does not depend on number ofabrasive grain participate inthegrinding process In other word, theworkingefficiencyofabrasivegrains can increase up to 20% as increasingofthe feeding speed from 12 m/min to 15 m/mm usinginclinedsegmentedgrinding wheels Keywords: inclinedsegmentedgrindingwheel (ISGW), SDK11 steel, roughness, abrasivegrains INTRODUCTION Inthe last few years, grinding process is a strategic process for machining new materials with tough characteristics, such as hard and brittle materials, ceramics, etc, which required a good accuracy and a high quality of surface roughness Grinding process can be used to combine high removal rate with high accuracy [1] Alternatively, grinding can be employed with moderate removal rates to produce high accuracy parts in large volumes In manufacturing mold plate, spherical grinding plays an important role because it is the simplest and least expensive process for machining materials which is popular in mold making technology To increase the productivity and quality ofgrinding process, researchers not only spend time to optimize the parameters on machine, apply new materials but also present new design of wheels to reduce average force and temperature to have better surface roughness, such as cup-type diamond-grindingwheels with hexagonal pattern were used to grind ceramic material shows advantage ofincreasing effective workingabrasivegrainsin comparison with conventional grinding wheels [2] According to the previous researches, smoother surface can be obtained by decreasing speed rate or decreasing cutting depth [3-14], but speed rate or cutting depth have the limit depending on ground samples or grinding machines In this work, newlydevelopedinclinedsegmentedgrinding wheels - ISGW with different number of segments on thewheel surface are used to grind SKD11 steel, which is applied widely in manufacturing mold plate and base The effects ofabrasivegrains and surface roughness of ground sample are evaluated This paper reveals a new mechanism ofgrinding process bythe proposed ISGWs Trang 145 HỘI NGHỊ KHCN TỒN QUỐC VỀ CƠ KHÍ - ĐỘNG LỰC NĂM 2017 Ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2017 Trường ĐH Bách Khoa - ĐHQG TP HCM EXPERIMENTAL Newlydevelopedgrindingwheelinclinedsegmented experiment, grinding wheels were dressed by industrial diamond grinding stone with grinding conditions of 0.1 mm cutting depth, 450 rpm wheel rotation speed in order to obtain flatness on thewheel surface Figure Inclinedsegmentedgrindingwheel which has outside diameter D = 350 mm, inner diameter d = 127 mm, wide of segment w = 10 mm, height of segment h = 15 mm, thickness B = 40 mm and inclined angle β=15 These wheels are characterized by number of segment Z, and inclined angle of segment β=15º All the wheels have outside diameter of 350 mm, inner diameter of 127 mm, wide and height of segment are 10 mm and 15 mm respectively Percentage of discontinue η, is defined as the ratio between the area does not containing abrasivegrains and the total area of wheels Four inclinedsegmentedgrinding wheels with different η (16.37, 18.19, 20.01 and 21.83%) and a conventional wheel with η = 0% were used as shown in Table Figure Grinding machine AMADA WASINO SE63 Figure Surface roughness Mitutoyo SJ-301 Table Number of segment Z and % discontinue η ofgrinding wheels Z η Z=0 Z = 18 Z = 20 Z = 22 Z = 24 0% 16,37% 18,19% 20,01% 21,83% Experiment procedures Samples are SKD11steel with dimensions of Length x Wide x Height = 60x30x10 mm A sample was placed at the center of machine table so that long edge was perpendicular to the shaft of machine Conventional and inclinedsegmentedgrinding wheels (Cn46 MV2 350x40x127-35m/s) were used Before each Trang 146 Grindingwheel rotation speed 450 rpm for the whole experiment process On each grinding wheel, experiment was carried out on different cutting conditions with cutting depth was 0.02 mm per pass, feeding speed were 12, 15 and 20 m/min alternatively The wheels were redressed before each grinding experiment The coolant water was sprayed into the contact zone between grindingwheel and sample during grinding process Grinding conditions are listed in Table The surface roughness, was measured using roughness tester Mitutoyo SJ-301 HỘI NGHỊ KHCN TỒN QUỐC VỀ CƠ KHÍ - ĐỘNG LỰC NĂM 2017 Ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2017 Trường ĐH Bách Khoa - ĐHQG TP HCM Table Specifications ofgrinding wheels, grinding conditions and sample Grinding wheels Inner diameter: 127 mm Outside diameter: 350 mm Thickness: 40mm Segment wide: 10 mm Segment height: 15 mm Inclined angle: 15º Cn: Corundum abrasive 46: Size ofabrasive grain MV2: Hardness Grinding condition Rotation speed: 450 rpm Cutting depth: 0.02mm and 0.05mm Feeding speed: 12, 15 and 20 m/min Sample Material: SKD11 Length: 60mm Wide: 30mm Height: 10mm RESUTS AND DISCUSSION Figure and show surface roughness Ra as function of number of segment Z for different feeding speed S = 12 and S = 15 m/min respectively The same trend ofthe surface roughness on sample ground by ISGW with different feeding speeds can be observe Discussion With small change in number of segment Z, depth of cut a or feeding speed S It is difficult to recognize the differences of input parameter between different cutting conditions Number ofabrasive grain participate ingrinding process is possible choice in this situation Figure Peripheral surface of conventional grindingwheel Number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second on conventional grinding wheel: ∙ = (grain) (1) Where grindingwheel revolution to complete thegrinding process along the length of workpiece inthe experiment; is a number ofabrasive on working surface ofgrinding wheel, inthe conventional wheel used inthe experiment = 109900 grains Figure Sample surface roughness Ra as function of number of segment Z at S = 12 m/min, a = 0.02 mm on SKD11 = 12 m/min = 200 mm/s Time need to complete thegrinding process along the length of workpiece: = = = 0.3 (s) (2) Grindingwheel revolution to complete thegrinding process along the length of workpiece: ∙ V = 0.3 ∙ 24.17 = 7.251 (rev) = (3) Number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second by conventional grinding wheel: = Figure Sample surface roughness Ra as function of number of segment Z at S = 15 m/min, a = 0.02 mm on SKD11 ∙ = ∙ = 332 (grains) (4) = 15 m/min = 250 mm/s Time need to complete thegrinding process along the length of workpiece: Trang 147 HỘI NGHỊ KHCN TOÀN QUỐC VỀ CƠ KHÍ - ĐỘNG LỰC NĂM 2017 Ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2017 Trường ĐH Bách Khoa - ĐHQG TP HCM = = = 0.24 (s) (5) Grindingwheel revolution to complete thegrinding process along the length of workpiece: = (6) ∙ V = 0.24 ∙ 24.17 = 5.801 (rev) Number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second by conventional grinding wheel: ∙ = = 5.801 ∙ = 266 (grains) (7) The number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second on ISGW can be calculated due to percentage of discontinue η on table Table Number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second on each grinding wheels at S = 12 m/min and S = 15 m/min TT Z % discontinu eη Number ofabrasive grain Z=0 332 266 Z = 18 16,37% 278 222 Z = 20 18,19% 272 218 Z = 22 20,01% 266 213 Z = 24 21,83% 260 208 Figure 7, illustrate the relation between number ofabrasive grain in contact with surface sample per unit area per second XS and surface roughness Ra On conventional grinding wheel, the surface roughness Ra decrease when the number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second increase or the feeding speed S decrease This result is in accord with metal cutting theory, which has been published in many researches about grinding operation, there are clear differences in surface roughness among different number ofabrasive grain [4-6] However, on ISGW, the desired surface roughness can be achieved at the cutting conditions with less number ofabrasive grain To put it differently, on ISGW, surface roughness does not depend on number ofabrasive grain participate inthegrinding process As shown in Figure 8, Curve (I) for feeding speed S = 12 m/min and Curve (II) for feeding speed S = 15 m/min in figure By multiplying 0.75 to the value of for the feeding speed S = 12 m/min, Curve (I) of feeding speed S = 12 m/min superposes on Curve (II) for feeding speed S = 15 m/min as shown in Figure In other words, workingefficiencyofabrasive grain on ISGW can increase by 25% byincreasingthe feeding speed from 12 m/min to 15 m/min Figure Surface roughness, versus number ofabrasivegrains XS Curve (I) for feeding speed S = 12 m/min and Curve (II) for feeding speed S = 15 m/min Figure Number ofabrasive grain in contact with sample surface per unit area per second as function of surface roughness Ra at a=0.02m/min Trang 148 HỘI NGHỊ KHCN TỒN QUỐC VỀ CƠ KHÍ - ĐỘNG LỰC NĂM 2017 Ngày 14 tháng 10 năm 2017 Trường ĐH Bách Khoa - ĐHQG TP HCM Figure Surface roughness, Ra versus number ofabrasivegrains XS Curve (I) of feeding speed S = 12 m/min is superposed on Curve (II) of feeding speed S = 15 m/min by multiplying 0.75 to the value of XS of feeding speed S = 12 m/min [3] S Malkin, Grinding Technology Theory and Applications Machining with Abrasives, Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood Limited Publication, 1989 [4] M C Shaw, Principles of Processing, USA: Oxford Publications, 1996 [5] J E Mayer and G P Fang, "Effects ofGrinding Parameters on Surface Finishing of Ground Ceramics", Annals ofthe CIRP, vol 44, 1995 [6] G Warnecke and U Rosenberger, "Basic of Process Parameter Selection inGrindingof Advanced Ceramics", Annals ofthe CIRP, vol 44, 1995 [7] J Pe´rez, S Hoyas, D.L Skuratov, Yu.L Ratis, I.A Selezneva, P Ferna´ndez de Co´rdoba, J.F Urchueguı´a eHeat “Transfer analysis of intermittent grinding processes”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 51 (2008) 4132–4138 [8] Taghi Tawakoli, Bahman Azarhoushang* (2011) “Intermittent grindingof ceramic matrix composites (CMCS) utilizing a developedsegmented whell” [9] Xiarui Fan, Michele Miller, Force analysis for segmental grinding, chining Science and Technology, 10 (2006), 435-455 CONCLUSIONS In this work, samples made bySKD11steel are ground by a conventional and newlydeveloped ISGWs Theabrasive grain efficiency and surface roughness were evaluated The following can be concluded: Surface roughness of sample ground by conventional wheel decrease as the number ofabrasive grain increase On ISGWs, surface roughness obtained the same values when feeding speed S are changed from 12 m/min to 15 m/mm alternately In other words, surface roughness does not depend on number ofabrasive grain participate inthegrinding process It is possible to increase theworkingefficiencyofabrasive grain on ISGW by 25% byincreasingthe feeding speed from 12m/min to 15m/min REFERENCES [1] W B Rowe, Principles of Modern Grinding Technology, Massachusetts: Elsevier, 2013 [2] Tien Dong NGUYEN, Koji MATSUMARU, Masakazu TAKATSU and Kozo ISHIZAKI, "Abrasive Grain Efficiency And Surface Roughness For Machining Ceramics ByNewlydeveloped Cup-Type DiamondGrindings-Wheels," Advantage in Technology of Material and Material Processing, vol 10, pp 77-84, 2008 Abrasive Science [10] Agarwal S, Venkateswara Rao P, “A new surface roughness prediction model for ceramic grinding”, Proc Inst Mech Eng, B J Eng Manuf, 219 (11) (2005) 811–821 [11] Young HT, Liao HT, Huang HY, “Surface integrity of silicon wafers in ultra precision machining”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 29(3–4) (2006) 372–378 [12] W H Tuan, J C Kuo, “Effects ofgrinding parameters on the reliability of alumina”, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 52 (1998) 41-45 [13] R Gupta, K S Shishodia, G.S Sekhon, “Optimization ofgrinding process parameters using enumeration method”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 112 (2001) 63-67 [14] G F Li, L S Wang, L B Yang, “Multi- parameter optimization and control ofthe cylindrical grinding process”, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 129 (2002) 232-236 Trang 149 ... EXPERIMENTAL Newly developed grinding wheel inclined segmented experiment, grinding wheels were dressed by industrial diamond grinding stone with grinding conditions of 0.1 mm cutting depth, 450 rpm wheel. .. of abrasive grain participate in the grinding process It is possible to increase the working efficiency of abrasive grain on ISGW by 25% by increasing the feeding speed from 12m/min to 15m/min... conventional grinding wheel: ∙ = (grain) (1) Where grinding wheel revolution to complete the grinding process along the length of workpiece in the experiment; is a number of abrasive on working surface of