Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 260 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
260
Dung lượng
2,37 MB
Nội dung
AnanalysisofthenatureandeffectivenessofcorporategovernanceinsmallerlistedAustraliancompanies Kevin Plastow B Comm (Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment ofthe requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the School of Accountancy Queensland University of Technology February 2011 Abstract The objective of this thesis is to investigate thecorporategovernance attributes ofsmallerlistedAustralian firms This study is motivated by evidence that these firms are associated with more regulatory concerns, the introduction of ASX CorporateGovernance Recommendations in 2004, and a paucity of research to guide regulators and stakeholders ofsmaller firms While there is an extensive body of literature examining theeffectivenessofcorporate governance, the literature principally focuses on larger companies, resulting in a deficiency inthe understanding ofthenatureandeffectivenessofcorporategovernanceinsmaller firms Based on a review of agency theory literature, a theoretical model is developed that posits that agency costs are mitigated by internal governance mechanisms and transparency The model includes external governance factors but in many smaller firms these factors are potentially absent, increasing the reliance on the internal governance mechanisms ofthe firm Based on the model, the observed greater regulatory intervention insmallercompanies may be due to sub-optimal internal governance practices Accordingly, this study addresses four broad research questions (RQs) First, what is the extent andnatureofthe ASX Recommendations that have been adopted by smaller firms (RQ1)? Second, what firm characteristics explain differences inthe recommendations adopted by smallerlisted firms (RQ2), and third, what firm characteristics explain changes inthegovernanceofsmaller firms over time (RQ3)? Fourth, how effective are thecorporategovernance attributes ofsmaller firms (RQ4)? Six hypotheses are developed to address the RQs The first two hypotheses explore the extent andnatureofcorporate governance, while the remaining hypotheses evaluate its effectiveness A timeseries, cross-sectional approach is used to evaluate theeffectivenessofgovernance Three models, based on individual governance attributes, an index of six items derived from the literature, andan index based on the full list of ASX Recommendations, are developed and tested using a sample of 298 smaller firms with annual observations over a five-year period (2002-2006) before and after the introduction ofthe ASX Recommendations in 2004 With respect to (RQ1) the results reveal that the overall adoption ofthe recommendations increased from 66 per cent in 2004 to 74 per cent in 2006 Interestingly, the adoption rate for recommendations regarding the structure ofthe board and formation of committees is significantly lower than the rates for other categories of recommendations With respect to (RQ2) the results reveal that variations in rates of adoption are explained by key firm differences including, firm size, profitability, board size, audit quality, and ownership dispersion, while the results for (RQ3) were inconclusive With respect to (RQ4), the results provide support for the association between better governanceand superior accounting-based performance In particular, the results highlight the importance ofthe independence of both the board and audit committee chairs, andof greater accounting-based expertise on the audit committee In contrast, while there is little evidence that a majority independent board is associated with superior outcomes, there is evidence linking board independence with adverse audit opinion outcomes These results suggest that board and chair independence are substitutes; inthe presence ofan independent chair a majority independent board may be an unnecessary and costly investment for smaller firms The findings make several important contributions First, the findings contribute to the literature by providing evidence on the extent, natureandeffectivenessofgovernanceinsmaller firms The A governance code The findings regarding board and chair independence, and audit committee characteristics, suggest that policy-makers could consider providing additional guidance for smaller I ? A“X rather than a prescriptive rules-based approach ii Table of Contents Abstract i Table of Contents iii List of Tables ix List of Figures xi Statement of Original Authorship xii List of Abbreviations xiii Acknowledgements xvi Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Motivation 1.3 Corporategovernanceinsmaller firms 1.3.1 The external governance environment 1.3.2 The internal governance environment 1.4 Research objectives and research questions 1.5 Theoretical framework 1.6 Research design 1.7 Summary of major findings 10 1.8 Contribution ofthe study 11 1.9 Organisation ofthe thesis 12 Chapter Two: Institutional setting 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 Development ofcorporategovernance principles and disclosure in Australia 15 2.2.1 Voluntary period (1991-1996) 16 2.2.2 Introduction of Listing Rule 3C(3)(j) (1996-2004) 17 2.2.3 Principles of Good CorporateGovernanceand Best Practice Recommendations 18 2.2.4 Changes subsequent to the introduction ofthe ASX recommendations (post 2003) 20 2.2.5 ASX recommendations inthe context of theories of regulation 21 2.3 Overview ofgovernance codes internationally 22 2.3.1 United States 23 2.3.2 United Kingdom 24 2.3.3 European Union 26 2.3.4 New Zealand 27 2.3.5 Hong Kong 27 2.3.6 Singapore 28 2.3.7 Summary 30 2.4 Corporategovernance codes andsmallercompanies 34 2.5 Conclusion 40 iii Chapter Three: Literature review 3.1 Introduction 43 3.2 Agency theory 43 3.3 Regulation ofcorporate disclosure 46 3.4 The relevance ofcorporategovernance 49 3.5 Theeffectivenessofcorporategovernance 51 3.5.1 Governanceand performance and valuation studies 51 3.5.2 Governanceand disclosure research 53 3.5.3 Governanceand ASX queries 53 3.5.4 Governanceand modified audit opinions 54 3.6 Internal governance factors 55 3.6.1 Board characteristics 56 3.6.2 Board committees 61 3.6.3 Internal control systems 64 3.7 External governance influences 65 3.7.1 Debt 65 3.7.2 External Audit 65 3.8 The relevance ofcorporategovernanceinsmallercompanies 66 3.9 Conclusion 68 Chapter Four: Theoretical framework and hypothesis development 4.1 Introduction 71 4.2 A framework for corporategovernance 72 4.3 Introduction ofthe ASX Best Practice Recommendations 77 4.3.1 Adoption of recommendations (RQ1) 77 4.3.2 Factors influencing the adoption ofcorporategovernance recommendations (RQ2) 80 4.3.3 Factors associated with changes incorporategovernance (RQ3) 84 4.4 Corporategovernanceand firm outcomes (RQ4) 85 4.4.1 Performance 86 4.4.2 Disclosure 87 4.4.3 ASX price movement queries 88 4.4.4 Modified audit opinions 89 4.5 Summary 90 Chapter Five: Research method 5.1 Introduction 91 5.2 Study period 91 5.3 Sample selection 92 5.4 Data sources 94 5.5 Research method 94 5.5.1 Internal corporategovernance environment 94 iv 5.5.2 Development ofgovernance index 95 5.5.3 Research method H1, H2A and H2B 97 5.5.4 Change in levels ofgovernance 99 5.5.5 Outcome-related research models (H3 H6) 99 5.5.6 The relationship between ASX recommendations and outcome variables 100 5.5.7 Internal governance variables 101 5.6 Outcome (dependent) variables 101 5.6.1 Performance 101 5.6.2 Disclosure 102 5.6.3 ASX price movement queries 104 5.6.4 Modified audit opinions 104 5.7 Definition of independent variables 105 5.7.1 Board size (BRDSZE) 105 5.7.2 Board independence (BDIND) 105 5.7.3 Independence of board chair (CHIND) 105 5.7.4 Board expertise (BDEXP) 106 5.7.5 Board meetings 106 5.7.6 Audit committee (AC) 106 5.7.7 Remuneration committee and nomination committee (RC and NC) 106 5.8 Control variables 107 5.8.1 Firm size (SIZE) 107 5.8.2 Industry (IND) 107 5.8.3 Audit firm (AUDIT) 108 5.8.4 Leverage (LEV) 108 5.8.5 Growth (GROWTH) 108 5.8.6 Ownership dispersion (SHLDRS) 109 5.8.7 Age (AGE) 109 5.8.8 Commitment test entities (CTE) 109 5.8.9 Pre-post (PREPOST) 110 5.9 Regression models 110 5.9.1 Regression models for theeffectivenessofcorporategovernance 2002-2006 111 5.9.2 Regression model for indices based on ASX recommendations 113 5.10 Summary 113 5.11 Conclusion 115 Chapter Six: Results ofthe extent andnatureofcorporategovernance 6.1 Introduction 117 6.2 Observation andanalysisofcorporategovernance reporting 117 6.3 Commencement ofthe Best Practice Recommendations 119 6.4 Change in ASX governance recommendations 2004-2006 122 6.5 Categories ofgovernance recommendations 126 v 6.6 Factors influencing adoption of recommendations 130 6.6.1 Descriptive statistics 131 6.6.2 Correlations 134 6.7 Regression analysisof factors associated with conformance with ASX recommendations (H2A) 137 6.7.1 Factors associated with overall governance score (GOVSC) 137 6.7.2 Behavioural index 138 6.7.3 Structural index 139 6.7.4 Disclosure index 140 6.7.5 Summary of regression analysis 141 6.8 Robustness testing 142 6.9 Change ingovernance 142 6.10 The relationship between committee formation and board size 144 6.11 Conclusion 147 Chapter Seven: Results of tests on theeffectivenessofcorporategovernance 7.1 Introduction 149 7.2 Descriptive statistics for variables inthe outcomes models 149 7.2.1 Data transformations 151 7.3 Correlations 153 7.4 Results for performance variables 2002- 2006 158 7.4.1 Return on assets (H3A) 158 7.4.2 Market performance (H3A) 161 G - H A 162 7.4.4 Governanceand market-sensitive disclosure (H4A) 165 7.4.5 Governanceand ASX queries (H5A) 166 7.4.6 Governanceand modified audit opinions (H6A) 168 7.4.7 Summary of results 170 7.5 Additional analysis 172 7.5.1 Non-contemporaneous association between governanceand return on assets (ROA) (2002-2006) 172 7.5.2 Board independence 174 7.5.3 Audit committee characteristics 176 7.5.4 Audit committee characteristics and performance outcomes (H3A) 178 7.5.5 Audit committee characteristics and disclosure (H4A) 179 7.5.6 Audit committee characteristics and ASX queries (H5A) 181 7.5.7 Audit committee characteristics and modified audit opinions (H6A) 181 7.5.8 Summary of associations between audit committee characteristics and dependent variables 182 7.5.9 Robustness testing 183 7.5.10 Summary of additional analysis 184 7.6 Governance indices created from the ASX recommendations 2004-2006 184 vi Bartholomeusz, S., and Tanewski, G (2006) The relationship between family firms andcorporategovernance Journal of small business management, 245-267 Bassett, M., Koh, P-S., and Tutticci, I (2007) The association between employee stock option disclosures andcorporate governance: Evidence from an enhanced disclosure regime The British Accounting Review, 39, 303-322 Baxt, R., Ramsay, I., and Stapledon, G (2002) Corporategovernancein Australia: the evolving legal framework and empirical evidence In L Keong (Ed.), Corporate Governance: an Asia-Pacific Critique Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia Beaver, W (1998) Financial reporting: an accounting revolution Upper saddle River: Prentice-Hall Becker, C., DeFond, J., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K., (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 1-24 Beekes, W., and Brown, P (2006) Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33, 422-450 Beneish, M (1999) Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP The Accounting Review, 74, 425-457 Berry, T., Fields, L., and Wilkins, M (2006) The interaction of multiple governance mechanisms in young newly public firms Journal ofCorporate Finance, 12, 449-466 Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., and Romano, R (2007) The promise and perils ofcorporategovernance indices Retrieved 25/08/09, from http://ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1019921 Bird, H., Chow, D., Lenne, J and Ramsay, I (2003) ASIC Enforcement Patterns: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, The University of Melbourne Blom, J., and Schauten, M (2006) Corporategovernanceandthe cost of debt Retrieved 22/02/2007, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=933615 Bonn, I (2004) Board structure and firm performance: evidence from Australia Journal oftheAustralianand New Zealand Academy of Management, 10, 14-24 Bosch, H (1991) Corporate practices and conduct Sydney: Business Council of Australia Bosch, H (1995) Corporate practices and conduct (3rd ed.) South Melbourne: Pitman Publishing Botosan, C (1997) Disclosure level andthe cost of equity capital The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323349 Bound, J., Jaeger, D., and Baker, R (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments andthe endogenous explanatory variable is weak Journal ofthe American Statistical Association, 90, 443-450 Brown, L., and Caylor, M (2006) Corporategovernanceand firm operating performance Retrieved 12/01/2007, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=586423 Brown, P (1994) Capital Markets-Based Research in Accounting: An Introduction Melbourne: Coopers and Lybrand, and Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand Brown, P., Taylor, S., and Walter, T (1999) The impact of statutory sanctions on the level and information content of voluntary corporate disclosure Abacus, 35, 138-162 Brown, R., and Gorgens, T (2009) Corporategovernanceand financial performance inanAustralian context Canberra: Australian Treasury Bruno, V., and Claessens, S (2007) Corporategovernanceand regulation: can there be too much of a good thing? Retrieved 25/02/2007, from http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2007/02/21/000016406_200 70221115016/Rendered/PDF/wps4140.pdf Bushee, B., Core, J., Guay, W., and Wee, J (2006) The role ofthe business press as an information intermediary Retrieved 01/06/2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=955021 Bushman, R., and Smith, A (2001) Financial accounting information andcorporategovernance Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 237-333 Bushman, R., and Smith, A (2003) Transparency, Financial Accounting Information, andCorporateGovernance Economic Policy Review, 9( April 2003), 65-87 Cadbury Committee (1992) Report ofthe Committee on the Financial Aspects ofCorporate Governance: The Code of Best Practice (Cadbury Code) London: Gee and Company Ltd Carcello, J., and Neal, T (2000) Audit committee composition and auditor reporting The Accounting Review, 75, 453-467 Carson, E (1996) Corporategovernance disclosure in Australia: the state of play Australian Accounting Review, 6, 3-10 224 Carter, D., Simkins, B., and Simpson, W G (2003) Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value The Financial Review, 38, 33-53 Chau, G., and Gray, S (2002) Ownership structure andcorporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 247-265 Chavent, M., Ding, Y., Fu, L., Stolowy, and Wang, H (2006) Disclosure and determinants studies: an extension using the divisive clustering method (DIV) European Accounting Review, 15, 181-218 Cheng, E., and Courtenay, S (2006) Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure The International Journal of Accounting, 41, 262-289 Christensen, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., and Stewart, J (2010) Are corporategovernance recommendations relevant for small Australianlisted companies? Research paper Gold Coast: Bond University Christy, J., Matolcsy, Z., Wright, A., and Wyatt, A (2009) The association between the market risk of equity and board charcteristics, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1368503 Claessens, S (2006) Corporategovernanceand development The World Bank Research Observer, 21, 91-122 Clarke, A (2006) SMEs andcorporate governance: politics, resources and trickle-down effects, Corporate Law Teachers' Association Conference Brisbane Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., and Wright, A (2004) Thecorporategovernance mosaic and financial reporting quality Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 87-152 Collett, P., and Hrasky, S (2005) Voluntary disclosure ofcorporategovernance practices by listedAustraliancompaniesCorporate Governance, 13, 188-196 Comrey, A., and Lee, H (1992) A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Core, J., Holthausen, R., and Larcker, D (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406 Core, J (2000) The directors' and officers' insurance premium: an outside assessment ofthe quality ofcorporategovernance Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 16, 449-477 CorporateGovernance Committee (2001) Code ofCorporateGovernance Singapore Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (CLERP) (1997) Proposals for Reform: Paper no Retrieved 06/09/2005, from http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?Navid=017&ContentID=286 Cranston, R (1982) Regulation and deregulation: general issues University of New South Wales Law Journal, 5, 1-28 Cremers, K., and Nair, V (2005) Governance mechanisms and equity prices The Journal of Finance, LX, 2859-2894 da Silva Rosa, R., Izan, H., and Lin, M (2004) Board characteristics ofAustralian IPOs: ananalysisin light ofthe ASX best practice recommendations Australian Accounting Review, 14, 25-32 Dallas News (2009) SEC's expansion of Sarbanes-Oxley Act could mean big costs for smaller companies, Dallas News Dallas: The Compliance Exchange Dalton, D., Daily,C., Johnson, J., and Ellstrand, A (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674-686 Davidson, R., Goodwin-Stewart, J., and Kent, P (2005) Internal governance structures and earnings management Accounting and Finance, 45, 241-267 De Angelo, L (1981) Auditor size and audit quality Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183-199 Dechow, P., Sloan, R., and Sweeney, A (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: ananalysisof firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36 DeFond, M., and Jiambalvo, J., (1994) Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, 145-176 DeFond, M., Hann, R., and Hu, X., (2005) Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Joournal of Accounting Research, 43, 153-193 Dignam, A., and Galanis, M (2004) Australia inside-out: thecorporategovernance system oftheAustralianlisted market Melbourne University Law Review, 28, 623-653 Dunteman, G (1989) Principal components analysis Newbury Park: SAGE Publications Inc 225 Dybvig, P., and Warachka, M (2010) Tobin's Q does not measure performance: theory, empirics and alternative measures Retrieved May 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1562444 Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., and Wells, M (1998) Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54 Eisenhardt, K (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74 Eng, L., and Mak, Y (2003) Corporategovernanceand voluntary disclosure Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22, 325-345 European CorporateGovernance Forum (2006a) Annual report 2005 Brussels: ECGF European CorporateGovernance Forum (2006b) Statement ofthe ECGF on the comply-or-explain principle Brussels: ECGF Fama, E (1980) Agency problems andthe theory ofthe firm The Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288307 Fama, E., and Jensen, M (1983) Separation of ownership and control Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325 Farinha, J., and Viana, L (2009) Board structure and modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Portuguese Stock Exchange International Journal of Auditing, 13, 237-258 Farrer, J (2008) Corporate governance: theories, principles and practice (Third ed.) South Melbourne: Oxford University Press Fearnley, S., Hines, T., McBride, K., and Brandt, R (2000) A peculiarly British institution: ananalysisofthe contribution made by the Financial Reporting Review Panel to accounting compliance inthe UK.: Centre for Business Performance, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Ferguson, A., and Matolcsy, Z (2004) Audit quality and post-earnings announcement drift Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11, 121-137 Feroz, E., Park, K., and Pastena, V (1991) The financial and market effects ofthe SEC's accounting and auditing enforcement releases Journal of Accounting Research, 29,( Supplement), 107-142 Financial Reporting Council (2009) About the FRC Retrieved 29/05/2009 from http://www.frc.org.uk/about/ Financial Reporting Council (2005) The Smith Guidance on Audit Committees Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/frc/Smith%20Report%202005.pdf Financial Reporting Council (2008) The Combined Code on CorporateGovernance Retrieved September 03, 2008, from http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/frc/Combined%20code%202006%20OCTOBER pdf Fleming, G (2003) Corporategovernancein Australia Agenda, 10, 195-212 Fogarty, M., and Lansley A (2002) Sleepers awake! Future directions for Auditing in Australia University of New South Wales Law Journal,, 25, Available from, http://www.mallesons.com/publications/alerts/6164629W.htm Gallery, G., Gallery, N., and Sidhu, B (2004) Quarterly cash flow reporting - is it useful? JASSA (Journal ofthe Securities Institute of Australia), Spring 2004(3), 14-18 Gallery, G., Cooper, E., and Sweeting, J (2008) Corporate disclosure quality: lessons from Australiancompanies on the impact of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards Australian Accounting Review, 18, 257-273 Garson, G D (2010) Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis, Factor analysis Retrieved 4/1/2010, from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/factor.htm GEM (2008) About GEM, from http://www.hkgem.com/aboutgem/market/e_main.htm Gillan, S (2006) Recent developments incorporate governance: an overview Journal ofCorporate Finance, 12, 381-402 Gillan, S L., Hartzell, J C., & Starks, L T (2003) Explaining Corporate Governance: Boards, Bylaws, and Charter Provisions, from http://ssrn.com/paper=442740 Gold, M (2006) Corporate governance, activism andthe role ofthe trustees JASSA (Journal ofthe Securities Institute of Australia), Winter 2006(2), 34-40 Gong, N (2007) Effectivenessand market reaction to the Stock Exchange's inquiry in Australia Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34, 1141-1168 226 Goodwin-Stewart, J., and Kent, P., (2006) The relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit Retrieved 29/05/2009, from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=business_pubs Gordon, E., Henry, E., and Palia, D (2004) Related party transactions: associations with corporategovernanceand firm value Retrieved 10 January 2007, from SSRN_ID572841_code22765.pdf Gorsuch, R (1983) Factor analysis New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Gul, F., and Leung, S (2004) Board leadership, outside directors' expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 351-379 Gujarati, D., and Porter, D (2009) Basic Econometrics New York: McGraw-Hill Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R (2010) Multivariate data analysis Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc Hart, O (1995) Corporate governance: some theory and implications The Economic Journal, 105, 678689 Healy, P., and Palepu, K., (2001) Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, andthe capital markets: a review ofthe empirical disclosure literature Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 405-440 Heck, R H (1998) Factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory approaches In Marcoulides G (Ed.), Modern methods for business research New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hendry, J (2002) The principal's other problems: honest incompetence andthe specification of objectives Academy of Management Review, 27, 98-113 Henry, D (2008) Corporategovernance structure andthe valuation ofAustralian firms: is there value in ticking boxes? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35, 912-942 Henry, D (2010) Agency costs, ownership structure andcorporategovernance compliance: A private contracting perspective Pacific-basin Finance Journal, 18, 24-46 Hines, T., McBride, K., and Page, M (1999) An investigation ofthe stock market reaction to press notices issued by the Financial Reporting Review Panel Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 5, 54-83 Hong Kong Exchange (2004) Amendments to the listing rules relating to the Code on CorporateGovernance Practices and Rules on theCorporateGovernance Report Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.hkex.com.hk/news.10dec2007/hkexnews/0411192news.htm Hong Kong Exchange (2005a) Appendix 14, Code on corporategovernance practices Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://www.hkex.com.hk/rule/listrules/appendix_14.pdf Hong Kong Exchange (2005b) Appendix 23, Corporategovernance report Retrieved September 03, 2008, from http://www.hkex.com.hk/rule/listrules/mb%20app%2023%20(e).pdf Hope, O.-K (2003) Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards and analysts' forecast accuracy: an international study Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2), 235-272 Horwath (2005) Corporategovernance report Sydney: Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd Horwath (2006) Corporategovernance report Sydney: Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd Horwath (2008a) Corporategovernance report Sydney: Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd Horwath (2008b) Mid-cap corporategovernance report Sydney: Horwath (NSW) Pty Ltd Huntley Investment Company (2003) Annual Report Sydney Institute of Internal Auditors (2006) Definition of Internal Auditors Retrieved 06/11/2006, from http://www.theiaa.org/index.cfm?doc_id=123 Institutional Analysis Pty Ltd (2002) A report on corporategovernance at five companies that collapsed in 2001 Melbourne: IA Research James, H (1999) Owner as manager: extended horizons andthe family firm International Journal ofthe Economics of Business,41-56 Jensen, M., and Meckling, W (1976) Theory ofthe Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360 Jensen, M (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, andthe failure of internal control systems The Journal of Finance, XLVIII, 831-880 John, K., and Senbet, L (1998) Corporategovernanceand board effectiveness Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 371-403 Kent, P., and Stewart, J (2008) Corporategovernanceand disclosures on the transition to International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting and Finance, 48 Keong, L (2002) Thecorporategovernance debate In L Keong (Ed.), Corporate Governance: an AsiaPacific Critique Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia 227 Kiel, G., Nicholson, G (2003) Board composition andcorporate performance: how theAustralian experience informs contrasting theories ofcorporategovernanceCorporate Governance, 11, 189-205 Klein, A (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 375-400 Klein, A., and Mohanram, P (2005) Why did so many poor-perfroming firms come to the market inthe late 1990s?: Nasdaq listing standards andthe bubble Retrieved 19/06/2006, from SSRN_ID724044_code152633.pdf Kline, P (1994) An easy guide to factor analysis London: Routledge Kohlbeck, M., and Mayhew, B (2004) Related party transactions Retrieved 10 January 2007, from SSRN_ID591285_code269522.pdf Krishnan, G., and Visvanathan, G (2009) Do auditors price audit committee expertise? The case of accounting versus nonaccounting financial experts Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 25, 115-144 La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A (2006) What works in securities laws? The Journal of Finance, LXI, 1-32 Lamba, A., and Stapledon, G (2001) The determinants ofcorporate ownership structure: Australian evidence, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=279015 Lang, M., & Lundholm, R (1993) Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings ofcorporate disclosures Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246-271 Larcker, D., Richardson, S., and Tuna, I (2005) How Important is Corporate Governance?, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=595821 Larcker, D., Richardson, S., and Tuna, I (2007) Corporate governance, accounting outcomes and organizational performance The Accounting Review, 82, 963-1008 Lawrence, J (1999) The economics of market confidence: (ac)costing securities market regulations: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, The University of Melbourne Leftwich, R (1980) Market failure fallacies and accounting information Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1980, 193-211 Lehn, K., Patro, S., and Zhao, M (2003) Determinants ofthe Size and Structure ofCorporate Boards: 1935-2000, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=470675 Lev, B., and Penman, S (1990) Voluntary forecast disclosure, nondisclosure, and stock prices Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 49-76 Lev, B., and Thiagarajan S., (1993) Fundamental information analysis Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 190-215 Linden, P., and Matolcsy, Z (2004) Corporategovernance scoring systems: what they tell us? Australian Accounting Review, 14, 9-16 Lion Selection Group (2005) Annual Report Melbourne Lobo, G., and Zhou, J (2001) Disclosure quality and earnings management Retrieved 19/06/2006, from http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=265550 London Stock Exchange plc (2010) AIM Market Statistics Retrieved 29 April 2010, from http://www.londonstockexchange.com/statistics/historic/aim/mar-10.pdf Long, J S., and Freese, J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata College Station: Stata press Mak, Y (2007) Improving the implementation ofcorporategovernance practices in Singapore Retrieved September 16, 2008, from http://www.mas.gov.sg/resource/news_room/press_releases/2007/CG_Study_Complete_Report _260607.pdf Mallin, C., and Ow-Yong, K (1998) Corporategovernancein small companies - the Alternative Investment Market Corporate Governance, 6(4), 224-232 Marsden, A., and Poskitt, R (2009) Ananalysisof ASX price queries Australian Accounting Review, 50, 217-230 Matolcsy, Z., Stokes, D., and Wright, A (2004) Do independent directors add value? Australian Accounting Review, 14, 33-40 McKinsey and Company (2002) Global investor opinion survey: key findings, from http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/organizationleadership/service/corpgovernance/pdf/Gl obalInvestorOpinionSurvey2002.pdf 228 McNamara, C., Gallery, G., and Fargher, N (2004) Management reluctance to disclose earnings information in a continuous disclosure environment: evidence from the association of between unexplained stock returns and subsequent disclosure Working Paper: University of New South Wales MinterEllison (2004) Corporate governance: Australian best practice recommendations: MinterEllison Mitnick, B (1980) The Political Economy of Regulation New York: Columbia University Press Molina, L (2006) ASX seeks smaller market listings The Courier-Mail 13 April 2006 Myers, S (2000) Capital structure The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81-102 Nam, S., and Nam, I (2004) Corporategovernancein Asia Chiyoda-ku: Asian Development Bank Institute NASDAQ (2008) Listing standards and fees Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.nasdaq.com/about/nasdaq_listing_req_fees.pdf Neagle, A., and Tsykin, N (2001) 'Please explain', ASX share price queries andtheAustralian continuous disclosure regime Melbourne: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, The University of Melbourne New York Stock Exchange (2003) CorporateGovernance Standards, from http://www.nyse.com/Frameset.html?nyseref=http%3A//www.nyse.com/regulation/listed/1101 074746736.html&displayPage=/lcm/lcm_subsection.html New York Stock Exchange (2004) Listed Company Manual Retrieved September 17, 2008, from http://www.nyse.com/Frameset.html?nyseref=http%3A//www.nyse.com/regulation/listed/1101 074746736.html&displayPage=/lcm/lcm_subsection.html New Zealand Exchange (2004) CorporateGovernance Best Practice Code Retrieved September 3, 2008, from http://www.nzx.com/asset/b2.pdf New Zealand Securities Commission (2004) Corporategovernancein New Zealand, Principles and Guidelines: a handbook for directors, executives and advisors Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://www.seccom.govt.nz/downloads/corporate-governance-handbook.pdf Nguyen, H., and Faff, R (2006) Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence Corporate Ownership and Control, 4, 24-32 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004) OECD Principles ofCorporateGovernance Paris Owusu-Ansah, S (1998) The impact ofcorporate attributes on the extent of mandatory disclosure and reporting by listedcompaniesin Zimbabwe International Journal of Accounting, 33, 605-631 Pallant, J (2007) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS Sydney: Allen and Unwin Palmer, P (2008) Disclosure ofthe impacts of adopting Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards Accounting and Finance, 48 Parsa, S., Chong, G., and Isimoya, E (2007) Disclosure ofgovernance information by small and mediumsized companiesCorporate Governance, 7, 635-648 Peasnell, K., Pope, P., and Young, S (2005) Board monitoring and earnings management: outside directors influence abnormal accruals Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32, 13111346 Peter, P (2005) The handbook of international corporategovernance London: Institute of Company Directors and Kogan Page Ltd Peterson, M Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Retrieved 20/12/2010 from http://nber.org/papers/w11280.pdf Pham, P., Suchard, J-A., and Zein, J (2007) Corporate governance, cost of capital and performance: evidence from Australian firms Retrieved 10/12/2007, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015986 Posner, R (1974) Theories of economic regulation Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 6, 335-358 Raber, R., and Lajoux, A (2005) The handbook of international corporategovernance London: Institute of Company Directors and Kogan Page Limited Ramsay, I M., and Hoad, Richard (1997) Disclosure ofcorporategovernance practices by Australiancompanies Melbourne: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation 229 Reddy, K., Locke, S., Scrimgeour, F., and Gunasekarage, A (2008) Corporategovernance practices of small cap companiesand their financial performance: an empirical study in New Zealand International Journal of Business Governanceand Ethics, 4, 51-78 Reise, S., Waller, N., and Comrey, A (2000) Factor analysisand scale revision Psychological Assessment, 12, 287-297 Scott, W (2003) Financial Accounting Theory (3rd ed.) Toronto: Pearson Education Canada Inc Securities and Exchange Commission (2002) SEC proposes additional disclosures, prohibitions to implement Sarbanes-Oxley Act, from http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2002-150.htm Securities and Exchange Commission (2004) Concept release concerning self-regulation, from http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/34-50700.htm Securities and Exchange Commission (2007a) Speech by SEC Commissioner: remarks before the CNMV CorporateGovernanceand Securities Markets Conference Retrieved 28/02/2007, from http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2006/spch020807rcc.htm Securities and Exchange Commission (2007b) SEC votes to adopt three rules to improve regulation for ofsmaller businesses Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-233.htm Securities and Exchange Commission (2007c) Testimony: Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: New evidence on the cost for smaller companies, from http://www.iasplus.com/usa/sec/0712coxsox404.pdf Securities and Exchange Commission (2009) Smaller Reporting Company Regulatory Relief and Simplification; Final Rule Retrieved 09/04/2009 from http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2008/338876fr.pdf Sengupta, P (1998) Corporate disclosure quality andthe cost of debt The Accounting Review, 73, 459474 Shapiro, S., Lasarev, M., McCauley, L (2002) Factor analysisof gulf war illness: What does it add to our understanding of possible health effects of deployment? American Journal of Epidemiology, 156, 578-585 Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R (1997) A survey ofcorporategovernanceThe Journal of Finance, LII, 737783 Shrader, C., Blackburn, V., and Iles, P (1997) Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study Journal of Managerial Issues, IX, 355-372 Sims, M., and Heazlewood, T (2003) The Past, Present and Future ofCorporateGovernance Regulation in Australia Paper presented at theThe 3rd Accounting History International Conference 2003, Siena, Italy Singapore Exchange (2001) Code ofCorporateGovernance Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://info.sgx.com/weblist.nsf/newDOCNAME/ST_CCGReport?opendocument Singapore Exchange (2005) Corporate governance: the role of watchdogs Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://info.sgx.com/webnewscentre.nsf/VPrintNews/48256838002F07B1482570C200096447?Op enDocument Singapore Exchange (2007) MAS and SGX to oversee corporategovernance for listedcompanies from September 2007 Retrieved September 9, 2008, from http://info.sgx.com/webnewscentre.nsf/b9c790d0d5ba5d2548256dcf0049ce28/48256838002f0 7b1482572ea0044e0a6?OpenDocument Smith, C., and Watts, R (1992) The investment opportunity set andcorporate financing, dividend and compensation policies Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263-292 Stigler, G (1971) The Theory of Economic Regulation Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3-21 Switzer, L (2007) Corporate governance, Sarbanes-Oxley, and small-cap firm performance The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47, 651-666 Tabachnick, B., and Fidell, L (2007) Using multivariate statistics Boston: Pearson Education Inc Teen, M Y (2007) Improving the implementation ofcorporategovernance practices in Singapore Monetary Authority of Singapore and Singapore Exchange Teoh, S., and Wong, T (1993) Perceived Auditor Quality andthe Earnings Response Coefficient The Accounting Review, 68, 346-366 The Independent (1994, 10 May 1994) Cadbury code rules are toned down for smallercompanies 230 Vafeas, N (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance Journal of financial economics, 53, 113-142 Verrecchia, R (1983) Discretionary disclosure Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179-194 Walker, R (1987) Australia's ASRB A case study of political activity and regulatory 'capture' Accounting and Business Research, 17, 269-286 Weber, J., and Willenborg, M (2003) Do expert intermediaries add value? Evidence from auditors in microcap IPOs Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 681-720 Weinberg, J (2003) Accounting for corporate behavior Economic Quarterly (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond), 89, 1-20 Welker, M (1995) Disclosure policy, information asymmetry and liquidity in equity markets Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 801-827 West, M (2006) Lend lease faces 9/11 dust-up The Australian, 06/06/2006 Wilson, S (2008, 26/2/2008) ASX looking to ease rules for 'penny dreadfuls' TheAustralian Xie, B., Davidson, W., and Da Dalt, P (2003) Earnings management andcorporate governance: The role ofthe board andthe audit committee Journal ofCorporate Finance, 9, 295-316 Yermack, D (1996) Higher market valuation ofcompanies with a small board of directors Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-211 Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., and Zhou, N (2007) Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 300-327 231 232 Appendix A Members ofthe ASX CorporateGovernance Council Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia Ltd Australasian Investor Relations Association Australian Council of Superannuation Investors Australian Institute of Company Directors Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees A “ A Australian Stock Exchange Limited Business Council of Australia Chartered Secretaries Australia CPA Australia Group of 100 Institute of Actuaries of Australia Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia Institute of Internal Auditors Australia International Banks and Securities Association of Australia Investment and Financial Services Association Law Council of Australia National Institute of Accountants Property Council of Australia Securities & Derivatives Industry Association Securities Institute of Australia Members ofthe Working Group for the Corporate Practices and Conduct Australian Institute of Company Directors Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants Business Council of Australia Law Council of Australia (Business Law Section) Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia Securities Institute of Australia 233 234 Appendix B The ASX Best Practice Recommendations 1.1 Formalise and disclose the functions reserved to the board and those delegated to management 2.1 A majority ofthe board should be independent directors 2.2 The chairperson should be an independent director 2.3 The roles of chairperson and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual 2.4 The board should establish a nomination committee 2.5 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 3.1 Establish a code of conduct to guide the directors, the chief executive officer (or equivalent), the chief financial officer (or equivalent) and any other key executives as to: 3.1.2 the responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices 3.2 Disclose the policy concerning trading in company securities by directors, officers and employees 3.3 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 4.1 Require the chief executive officer (or equivalent) andthe chief financial officer (or financial reports present a true and fair view, in all material respects, ofthe operational results and are in accordance with relevant accounting standards 4.2 The board should establish an audit committee 4.3 Structure the audit committee so that it consists of: only non-executive directors a majority of independent directors an independent chairperson, who is not chairperson ofthe board at least three members 4.4 The audit committee should have a formal charter 4.5 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 5.1 Establish written policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior management level for that compliance 5.2 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 6.1 Design and disclose a communications strategy to promote effective communication with shareholders and encourage effective participation at general meetings 6.2 Request the external auditor to attend the annual general meeting and be available to answer shareholder questions about the conduct ofthe audit andthe preparation and 235 7.1 The board or appropriate board committee should establish policies on risk oversight and management 7.2 The chief executive officer (or equivalent) andthe chief financial officer (or equivalent) should state to the board in writing that: 7.2.1 the statement given in accordance with best practice recommendation 4.1 (the integrity of financial statements) is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal compliance and control which implements the policies adopted by the board system is operating efficiently and effectively in all material respects 7.3 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 8.1 Disclose the process for performance evaluation ofthe board, its committees and individual directors, and key executives 9.1 P enable investors to understand (i) the costs and benefits of those policies and (ii) the link between remuneration paid to directors and key executives andcorporate performance 9.2 The board should establish a remuneration committee 9.3 Clearly distinguish the structure of nonfrom that of executives 9.4 Ensure that payment of equity-based executive remuneration is made in accordance with thresholds set in plans approved by shareholders 9.5 Provide the information indicated in Guide to reporting on Principle 10.1 Establish and disclose a code of conduct to guide compliance with legal and other obligations to legitimate stakeholders 236 Appendix C Australian Stock Exchange Listing Rules Appendix 4A List ofcorporategovernance matters The following is an indicative list ofcorporategovernance matters that an entity may take into account when making the statement in its annual financial statements under rule 4.10.3: If the entity is a body corporate, whether individual directors, including the Chair, are executive or non-executive directors (in the case of a trust, whether individual directors ofthe management company, including the Chair, are executive or non-executive directors) The main procedures the entity has in place for: reviewing the membership of that body; and nominating representatives to that body If a procedure involves a nomination committee, set out, or summarise, the main responsibilities, the names of committee members and their positions in relation to the entity (eg, director ofthe company) The policies relating to the appointment and retirement of non-executive directors (in the case of a trust, non-executive directors ofthe management company) The main procedures by which the governing body or individual members of it can seek independent professional advice, at the entit duties If the entity is a body corporate, the main procedures for establishing and reviewing the compensation arrangements for: the chief executive officer (or equivalent), and other senior executives ofthe governing body, and non-executive members ofthe governing body If a procedure involves a remuneration committee, set out, or summarise, the main responsibilities and rights, andthe names of committee members If a member ofthe committee is director If the entity is a trust, the main procedures for establishing and reviewing the compensation arrangements for the governing body If a procedure involves a remuneration committee, set out, or summarise, the main responsibilities and rights, andthe names of committee members If director ofthe management c 237 The main procedures the entity has in place for the nomination of external auditors, and for reviewing the adequacy of existing external audit arrangements (particularly the scope and quality ofthe audit) If a main responsibilities and rights, andthe names of committee members If a member ofthe company), s T putting arrangements in place to manage them T to standards 238 ... examining the effectiveness of corporate governance, the literature principally focuses on larger companies, resulting in a deficiency in the understanding of the nature and effectiveness of corporate. .. governance items that can be assessed in both phases, aiding the analysis of changes induced by the introduction of the recommendations Assessing the nature and extent of corporate governance in smaller. .. ownership and monitoring In Figure 1.1, the right-hand side of the diagram demonstrates the flow of information from companies to their investors and financial intermediaries In considering the roles