Introduc corporate finance ch18

Dividend Policy: Does It Matter 18.1 Different Types of Dividends 18.2 Standard Method of Cash Dividend Payment 18.3 The Benchmark Case: An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy 18.4 Taxes, Issuance Costs, and Dividends 18.5 Repurchase of Stock 18.6 Expected Return, Dividends, and Personal Taxes 18.7 Real World Factors Favoring a High Dividend Policy 18.8 A Resolution of Real-World Factors? 18.9 What We Know and Do Not Know About Dividend Policy 18.10 Summary and Conclusions Different Types of Dividends  Many companies pay a regular cash dividend     Often companies will declare stock dividends    Public companies often pay quarterly Sometimes firms will throw in an extra cash dividend The extreme case would be a liquidating dividend No cash leaves the firm The firm increases the number of shares outstanding Some companies declare a dividend in kind   Wrigley’s Gum sends around a box of chewing gum Dundee Crematoria offers shareholders discounted cremations Standard Method of Cash Dividend Payment Cash Dividend - Payment of cash by the firm to its shareholders Ex-Dividend Date - Date that determines whether a stockholder is entitled to a dividend payment; anyone holding stock before this date is entitled to a dividend Record Date - Person who owns stock on this date received the dividend Procedure for Cash Dividend Payment 25 Oct Nov Nov Nov Dec … Declaration Date ExCumdividend dividend Date Date Record Date Payment Date Declaration Date: The Board of Directors declares a payment of dividends Cum-Dividend Date: The last day that the buyer of a stock is entitled to the dividend Ex-Dividend Date: The first day that the seller of a stock is entitled to the dividend Record Date: The corporation prepares a list of all individuals believed to be stockholders as of November Price Behavior around the ExDividend Date  In a perfect world, the stock price will fall by the amount of the dividend on the ex-dividend date -t … -2 -1 +1 +2 … $P $P - div The price drops Exby the amount of dividend Date the cash dividend Taxes complicate things a bit Empirically, the price drop is less than the dividend and occurs within the first few minutes of the ex-date The Benchmark Case: An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy  A compelling case can be made that dividend   policy is irrelevant Since investors not need dividends to convert shares to cash they will not pay higher prices for firms with higher dividend payouts In other words, dividend policy will have no impact on the value of the firm because investors can create whatever income stream they prefer by using homemade dividends Homemade Dividends    Bianchi Inc is a $42 stock about to pay a $2 cash dividend Bob Investor owns 80 shares and prefers $3 cash dividend Bob’s homemade dividend strategy:  Sell shares ex-dividend homemade dividends Cash from dividend $160 Cash from selling stock $80 Total Cash $240 Value of Stock Holdings $40 × 78 = $3,120 $3 Dividend $240 $0 $240 $39 × 80 = $3,120 Dividend Policy is Irrelevant   Since investors not need dividends to convert shares to cash, dividend policy will have no impact on the value of the firm In the above example, Bob Investor began with total wealth of $3,360: $42 $3,360 = 80 shares × share • After a $3 dividend, his total wealth is still $3,360: $39 $3,360 = 80 shares × + $240 share • After a $2 dividend, and sale of ex-dividend shares,his total wealth is still $3,360: $3,360 = 78 shares × $40 + $160 + $80 share Irrelevance of Stock Dividends: Example Shimano USA has million shares currently outstanding at $15 per share The company declares a 50% stock dividend How many shares will be outstanding after the dividend is paid? A 50% stock dividend will increase the number of shares by 50%: million×1.5 = million shares After the stock dividend what is the new price per share and what is the new value of the firm? The value of the firm was $2m × $15 per share = $30 m After the dividend, the value will remain the same Price per share = $30m/ 3m shares = $10 per share Dividends and Investment Policy  Firms should never forgo positive NPV projects  to increase a dividend (or to pay a dividend for the first time) Recall that on of the assumptions underlying the dividend-irrelevance arguments was “The investment policy of the firm is set ahead of time and is not altered by changes in dividend policy.” A Resolution of Real-World Factors?  Reasons for Low Dividend    Personal Taxes High Issuing Costs Reasons for High Dividend  Information Asymmetry   Lower Agency Costs     capital market as a monitoring device reduce free cash flow, and hence wasteful spending Bird-in-the-hand: Theory or Fallacy?   Dividends as a signal about firm’s future performance Uncertainty resolution Desire for Current Income Clientele Effect What is the “information content” or “signaling” hypothesis?  Managers hate to cut dividends, so they will not raise dividends unless they think a raise is sustainable So, investors view dividend increases as signals of management’s view of the future  Therefore, a stock price increase at the time of the dividend increase could reflect higher expectations for future EPS, not a desire for dividends Clientele Effect  Different groups of stockholders prefer different dividend payout policies some investors prefer high payouts: many retirees, pension funds, and university endowment funds are in a low (or zero) tax bracket, and have a need for current cash income  other investors prefer low payouts: investors in their peak earnings years who are in high tax brackets and who have no need for current cash income should prefer low payout stocks  What We Know and Do Not Know About Dividend Policy    Corporations “Smooth” Dividends Dividends Provide Information to the Market Firms should follow a sensible dividend policy:    Don’t forgo positive NPV projects just to pay a dividend Avoid issuing stock to pay dividends Consider share repurchase when there are few better uses for the cash Fama-French JFE 2001    Paying dividends was the norm until the late 1970s In 1978, 66.5% of companies paid dividends By 1999, that percentage had fallen to 20.8% Startups, small companies, and high-growth companies were the least likely to pay dividends, but the practice of paying dividends had fallen off across all major categories Why the change?  “Double taxation”?    But that disparity existed before and after the late 1970s An increasing portion of stock holdings are now in taxdeferred retirement accounts, where tax calculations aren’t relevant Two other trends that began in the 1970s provide a better explanation  The boom in mergers and acquisitions and the explosion of stock options Stock issued to finance a merger or to pay option benefits means less available money to pay out as dividends to shareholders M&A and Stock Buybacks  The consensus among scholars of the two recent M&A waves is that most big mergers failed to maximize shareholder value    Acquiring companies often paid too much (the so-called winner’s curse) Insider executives of the enlarged enterprise, however, commanded heftier compensation Free cash spent on a stock buyback (which has the convenient effect of pumping up the stock price for a chief executive waiting to exercise an option) is money that can’t be spent on dividends Alternatives to Paying Dividends Select Additional Capital Budgeting Projects Share Repurchase Acquire Other Companies Purchase Financial Assets Stock Dividends Vs Stock Splits  Stock dividend: Firm issues new shares in lieu of paying a cash dividend  10% stock dividend each 100 owned get 10 shares for  Stock split: Firm increases the number of shares outstanding  2:1 split owned get new share for each share Stock Dividends Vs Stock Splits,  Both stock dividends and stock splits increase continued the number of shares outstanding, so the “pie is divided into smaller pieces”  Unless the stock dividend or split conveys information, or is accompanied by another event like higher dividends, the stock price falls so as to keep each investor’s wealth unchanged  When should a firm consider declaring a stock dividend? Hard to come up with a good argument for small stock dividends such as 5% or 10%  Administrative costs hurt, and there are few if any benefits   When should a firm consider splitting its stock? There is a widespread belief that the optimal price range for stocks is $20 to $80  Stock splits can be used to keep the price in the optimal range  Stock splits generally occur when management is confident, so are interpreted as positive signals  Accounting Treatment of Splits and Stock Dividends A Before:  Common stock 1M $1 par; $1million shares) Add paid in capital Retained earnings 9M 100M Total equity$110M Market price per share $50  B “Small” stock dividend (10%)  100,000 new shares at $50 each = $5M, so Common $1.1M ($1 par; 1.1 million shares) Add paid in capital Retained earnings Total equity Market price per share 13.9M 95M $110M $45.45 If I had 100 shares at $50 = $5000/110 = $45.45  C A 4-for-1 stock split Common ($.25 par; million shares) $1M Add paid in capital 9M Retained earnings Total equity$110M 100M Summary and Conclusions       The optimal payout ratio cannot be determined quantitatively In a perfect capital market, dividend policy is irrelevant due to the homemade dividend concept A firm should not reject positive NPV projects to pay a dividend Personal taxes and issue costs are real-world considerations that favor low dividend payouts Many firms appear to have along-run target dividend-payout policy There appears to be some value to dividend stability and smoothing There appears to be some information content in dividend payments ... Investors can create positions in high dividendyield securities that avoid tax liabilities Thus, corporate managers need not view dividends as tax-disadvantaged Agency Costs  Agency Cost of Debt... explanation  The boom in mergers and acquisitions and the explosion of stock options Stock issued to finance a merger or to pay option benefits means less available money to pay out as dividends to