Should higher education be available to all? If we only allow access to college or university to good students, we, may have an economical advantage but we, apparently, destroy the future of those who have lower marks A student`s life should be of prime concern and I believe that all students should be eligible for higher education To begin with, good study does not guarantee the qualities of a good specialist on field A good student knows how to focus on all of the subjects of the learning program and have good marks in all of them, which gives him a good general preparation In contrast, a good specialist has to be perfect in a specific branch and go further than the learning program prescripts Thus, if we reduce the number of students in colleges and universities by only accepting good ones, the economical advantage for the whole society is not evident On the other hand, a ediocre?student, some times, is driven by a passion to specific discipline or subject and finally becomes a veritable specialist While total time of education is limited, this passion results in worse marks in other disciplines But it does not mean that this student really is mediocre When we accept all students to higher education we spend more for education but encourage development of person for the good of the whole society and, maybe, obtain a good specialist Finally, some talented persons not match to ordinary system of education They are considered as very bad students The classic example is that of Albert Einstein, the famous physicist, who had serious problems with arithmetic in high school We could continue with examples of our days by mentioning extraordinary computer and electronics designers with similar problems Availability of higher education has crucial meaning for the future of all students Notions of good student?and ad student? based on the marks, are not sufficiently sophisticated to define destiny of them Consequently, all students should have access to colleges or universities