Strategic management accounting by austin sams

Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams, Strategic management accounting by austin sams

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW PROGRAM: BA [HONS] ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT MODULE: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING MODULE CODE: APC309 MODULE TUTOR: MR MIKE BAKER SUBMISSION DATE: 22ND MAY, 2009 MANAGEMENT REPORT ON BUDGETING SYSTEM & MANAGING MANAGING WORKING CAPITAL PREPARED BY 089003624 AUSTIN SAMS UDEH Life changing changing Word counts 3450 TABLE OF CONTENT 1.0 2.0 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Budgeting, strategy and Organizational control system 1.2 Behavioural Aspect of budgeting PART I: TRADITIONAL BUDGETING BUDGETING SYSTEM 2.1 2.2 Argument infavour of traditional budgeting Argument against traditional budgeting 2.3 ALTERNATIVES APPROACHES TO TRADITIONAL BUDGETING 2.3.1 Better budgeting approach 2.3.1.1 Zero-Based Budgeting 2.3.1.2 Rolling Budget & forecasts 2.3.1.3 Activity-based budgeting 2.3.1.4 Balanced Scorecard 2.3.2 Beyond budgeting approach 9 10 12 13 14 BUDGETING SYSTEMS & BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT 15 2.4.1 Budgeting system and Stable environment 2.4.2 Budgeting system and Dynamic environment 15 17 2.4 3.0 PART II: WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEM MANAGEMT ANAGEMT 3.1 Objectives and Components of Working capital 18 18 3.2 Working Capital cycle of a manufacturing firm 3.3 Improving the working capital cycle 22 3.3.1 Management of inventory 22 3.3.2 Management of debtors 23 3.3.3 Management of cash 24 3.3.4 Management of payables 24 4.0 CONCLUSION 5.0 REFERENCES REFERENCES 24 1.0 I GENERAL INTRODUCTION t is an established dictum that, accounting is not an end in itself, but a means to an end The end is to facilitate business strategy towards achieving success Accounting theorists have long recognized that traditional accounting information provides critical decision-influencing and decision-facilitating information for organizational control [ e.g Baiman [1982]; Birnberg et al 1988; Merchant, 1985a; Tiessen and Waterhouse, 1983] Unfortunately, critics1 of management accounting argued that management accounting has failed to provide relevant, useful and timely information for planning and control in the rapidly changing and highly competitive business environment The quest to overcome the weakness in traditional management accounting system gave birth to “Strategic Management accounting2” Lying critically, at the heart of the managerial control functions is budgeting and budgetary control [as depicted in fig below] Figure [1] Phases of management control system [University of Sunderland, 2008 p 14 Critics of management accounting e.g Goldratt [1983]; Kaplan and Johnson, [1987]; Cooper and Kaplan [1988] Jayson, [1987]; Shank & Govindarajan, [1998]; Umble and Srikanth, [1990], shares similar views, that traditional management accounting systems is incompatible with modern production systems The notion of “strategic management accounting” centre’s around linking business strategy & budgeting, and increasing competitive advantage with strategic accounting information see, Simmonds, [1981, cited in Drury, 2007]; Lord, [1996]; Wilson, [1995]; Bromwich, [1990]; Dixon, [1998]; Tim Blumerntritt, [2006]; Snow & Hambrick, [1980]; Philip Sadler,[ 2003]; Johnson and Scholes, [1998:55] 1.1 Budgeting, Strategy and Organizational control system Budgeting as a conventional tool for management control system [Ekholm and Walin, 2000; Merchant and Van der Stede, 2003] has received an overwhelming popularity in recent times, regarding it strategic role in organizational control system Budget has been defined as a “predictive model” of organizational activity, quantitatively expressed, for a set time period “or simply a plan that is measurable and timely [Bruns & Waterhouse, 1975; Fredrick, 2001; Proctor, 2006; Terry Lucey, 1992:85] While budget can simply be likened to a ‘financial road-map3, budgetary control is a technique whereby actual results are compared with budgets and corrective actions are taken should there arise any variance The two basic categories of budgets [Cohen, et al, 1994:171] are operational and financial budgets Both operational budget4 and financial budget5 are usually transformed into what is known as the “master budget” as an overall financial plan for the fiscal year ahead (See figure below) F Figure [2] components of Master’s budget Budgeting and organizational strategy while budget is been likened to a financial road map, showing where an organization is heading and how to get there, organizational strategy help provides answers to questions such as “where are we now?; where are we going? And how we get there? The operational budget has components such as; sales budget, production budget, R&D budget; Administrative expense budgets etc Financial budget comprises of the cash budget; budgeted profit and loss, and budgeted balance sheets 1.2 Behavioural aspect of budgeting The effectiveness of budgeting and budgetary control depends largely on the behavior and attitudes of managers6 and possibly other employees [CIMA, 2007] Researches7 on the behavioural effects of budget concludes that improperly administered budget is capable of generating conflicts in an organization (see fig below) Figure [2] the effect of level of budget difficulty on motivation and performance Budget is positive and good for the organization when used as a motivating factor Ironically, human factor in budgeting process has a negative effect The lesson here for managers is that care should be exercise in budget design and implementation Researches on the behavioural effects of budget e.g Argyris, [1952]; Vroom,[1960]; Hopwood, [1974]; Hofstede, [1968]; Horngren etal, [2005: 491], concludes that improperly administered budget is capable of generating conflicts in an organization Researches on the purpose of budgeting and budgetary control concludes that budget serves a multiple of roles8 in an organization [Emmanuel etal, 1990 cited in Bhimani,(ed,2005) The crucial role of the budget as an organizational control tool has long been recognized, see Bruns & Waterhouse [1975]; Khalladwalla, [1972]; Merchant, [1984]; Horngren etal, [2005]; Drury, [2008] Although authors such as Barrett and Fraser, [1977]; Churchill, [1984]; Epstein and Manzoni, [2002]; Merchant and Manzoni, [1989], McWatters, Morse and Zimmerman, [2001:242] have claimed that a given budgetary control system cannot serve multiple purposes (e.g., planning versus performance evaluation, planning versus motivation) equally well Their argument concludes that by implication, different purposes of budgetary control systems cannot be the same if they are in conflict The central purpose of budget as summarized by CIMA, [2008]; Atrill and Mclaney, [2007]; Drury, [2008]; Kral, [2006]; Anthony & Govindarajan, [2000]; Ronald Hilton, [2008: 348]; Fibirova etal, [2007] includes; a means of authorizing actions, focus for forecasting and compel planning a channel of communication and enhance coordination, a means of motivating organizational participants and a vehicles for performance evaluation and control Unfortunately, Fraser & Hope [2005], took an entirely different view by questioning the relevance of budgeting in recent times At the forefront of anti-budgeting crusade with several titles9, canvassing for “dismantling” the budgeting system”is BBRT The report is in two main parts: while part one critically analyses argument infavour and against the “traditional budgeting and budgetary control” in the light of its suitability to stable and dynamic business environment, part two extensively discusses managing working capital cycle of xyz limited, a typical manufacturing organization The multiple roles of the budget e g “The End of traditional Budgeting”, “Time to Replace traditional budgeting”; “Traditional Budgeting time is Up” etc], 2.0 TRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL BUDGETING SYSTEM Research conducted by Kennedy and Dugdale, [1999, cited in better budgeting forum report, 2004:2] claimed that today, 99% of European and US companies are still using traditional budgeting system10 and have no intention of abandoning it Paradoxically, [p.2] of the same report stated that up to 60% of those companies still claim that they are not wholly satisfied with the traditional budgeting system but are working assiduously to improving the system Traditionally, this type of budgeting system can be performed in several ways, the two extremes are; are the bottom-up11, and the top-down approach12 See [appendix 4], for benefits and problems 2.1 Argument in favour of traditional budgeting It seems reasonable to describe traditional budgeting as a historic bag containing both benefits and problems within it Wildavsky et al, [2001:147], has argue that traditional budgeting is simpler, easier, more controllable, flexible than advanced budgeting techniques13 and more likely to be the appropriate budgeting system for a firm operating in a stable market Terry Lucey, [2003: 204, has claimed that benefit from traditional budgeting system does not accrue automatically, it must be properly designed and administered Lucey further explains, that its a major formal way of translating organizational objectives into plans; an important medium for communication, coordination; helps in promoting a coalition of interest and increase motivation and saves managerial time an attention directed to areas of greatest concern by the exception principle at the heart of budgetary control 10 Traditional budgeting system basically, based next year’s budget on the current year’s results plus an amount for estimated growth or inflation [CIMA, 2004] It simply assumes that the activities will continue in the same fashion in an approach described as incremental budgeting system 11 In bottom-up approach- unit managers prepare their own budgets and these are reviewed and consolidated by a central department Changes are then suggested from the centre and eventually, after some negotiation, a budget is agreed 12 In top-down approach - an initial estimate is prepared by the centre, with targets for each unit This is then expanded by unit managers to form a detailed budget 13 The name given to ‘Better budgeting’ and ‘Beyond Budgeting’ techniques 2.2 Argument against traditional budgeting Traditional budgeting has for long been criticized for its inadequacy as a means of management control Criticisms of its inadequacy in the fast-changing business world dates back to mid 1980’s with the emergence of Johnson & Kaplan, (1987) seminal book titled “Relevance Lost.” The classical weaknesses inherent in traditional budgeting system as commonly examined by authors [ e.g Alan Upchurch 2002:495; Horngren et al 2005; Terry Lucey, 1992:99; Fraser and Hope, 2005; Drury, 2007] is that, past will dominate the future, with past inefficiencies being carried forward to future periods Bunce and Fraser, [1997]; Hope and Fraser, [1997]; Fanning, [1999], view traditional budgeting process as bureaucratic and protracted, full of inefficiencies and ineffectiveness For a better understanding, Adams et al [2003: 23], classify weaknesses in traditional budgeting practices under three principal headings, from research conducted by Cranfield School of management as; Competitive Strategy: budgets are rarely strategically focused and are often contradictory; budgets concentrate on cost reduction and not on value creation; budgets constrain responsiveness and flexibility, and are often a barrier to change; and budgets add little value- they turn to be bureaucratic and discourage creative thinking Business process: budgets are time consuming and costly to put together; budgets are developed and updated too infrequently- usually annually; budgets are based on unsupported assumptions and guesswork; and budgets encourage gaming and vicious behavior Organizational capability: budgets strengthen vertical command and control; budgets not reflect the emerging network structures that organizations are adopting; budgets reinforce departmental barriers rather than encourage knowledge sharing; and budgets make people feel undervalued Drawing from the foregoing, its seems logical, to infer that flaws14 in traditional budgeting system collectively results in business underperformance and an alternative system is needed 2.3 Alternative approaches to traditional system It is quite interesting to know that no other innovations in management accounting research have ever triggered such an overwhelming, highly divergence views and yet-unresolved debate than that of alternative to traditional budgeting system15 The current debate on the appropriate alternatives to traditional budgeting system has two approaches namely; a Better budgeting group led by CIMA and ICAEW16 The approach advocates17 improvement to traditional budgeting system [Fanning, 1999; Better budgeting report, 2004:2] b Beyond budgeting group led by BBRT18 The “beyond budgeting” approach advocates19 a radical changes to budgeting process Now, what is the appropriate alternative to replace the traditional budgeting system? Is the question begging for an answer 2.3.1 Zero-based budgeting In an attempt to overcome the weaknesses in traditional budgeting system, Zero-based approach was born to help find answers to two basic questions: “Are current activities efficient and effective?” and should current activities be eliminated or reduced to fund higher-priority?” ZBB is an approach that tries to find answers to these questions by using a decision-package ranking 14 The implications of flaws in traditional system tend towards promoting inward-looking, focuses on achieving a budget figure, rather than on implementing business strategy and shareholder value creation over a long-term 15 Movement of alternative to traditional budgeting system as initiated by practitioners in Europe and U.S 16 Source:www.bbrt.com Improving the traditional budgeting system with tools such as rolling forecasts, balance scorecard etc to make budget forward-looking, flexible and dynamic to cope with the fast-changing environment rather than abandoning it 18 Better Budgeting Reports available at http://www.icaew.com/index.cfm/route/117649/icaew_ga/pdf 19 It’s of the philosophy, that the whole budgeting system be abolished and be replaced with a more pragmatic, more adaptive, a decentralized and participative model See, Hope and Fraser, [1997]; better budgeting report, [2004:2]; Atrill & Mclaney,[ 2007:196] 17 process 20 [Pyhrr, 1977] This approach basically involves preparing one budget for each centre from a zero base and that each cost element be specifically justified to be included in the next year’s budget The major benefits includes; efficient allocation of resources, removal of inefficiencies and obsolete operations Weaknesses on the other hand includes; high degree of skill in it construction, consume managerial time and involves high volumes of paper work 2.3.2 Rolling Budgets and forecasts The struggle for survival in highly competitive business environment was long recognized by Herbert Spencer as early as 1851, when he coined a phrase “survival of the fittest”21 Business must be flexible and innovative What seems difficult is that of integrating the effects of innovations into traditional budgeting system, to worsen the case, is where fixed annual budget is in use Firms operating in a rapidly changing industry have adopted a rolling budgets and forecasts, in an effort trying to overcome the rigidity in traditional systems and to cope with uncertainties [Hayes, 2002:116] Rolling budget is simply a quantitative plans that is continually updated or simply “budget for life22” A rolling budget [Drury, 2007; Atrill and Mclaney, 2007:173] will add a new month to replace the month that has just passed, thereby ensuring that, at all times, and there will be a budget for a full planning period Figure [3 below] compare four-quarter rolling with traditional calendar-based budget 20 This process provides management with an operational tool to evaluate and allocate its resources efficiently and effectively, providing individual manager a system for identifying, evaluating and communicating his activities and alternatives to higher levels of management 21 In 1851, Herbert Spencer coin the phrase “Survival of the fittest” to explain competition in free market economies 22 Rolling budget is often called “budget for life” by many 10 The BBRT28 maintains that “better budgeting” is not the answer to problems of traditional planning and budgeting caused by fast-changing business world [Better budgeting report, 2004:8] Adding that the only radical way is by “dismantling budgeting system and move towards” a more adaptive planning model as depicted in figure [5] below Figure Tradtional versus Beyond budgeting model Benefits and problems of beyond budgeting 28 BBRT- denote; Beyond Budgeting Round Table 15 One of the fundamental benefits of the model as opined by Fraser & Hope is that, its eradicate the traditional mentality of performance measurement and in the fast-changing business environment, the “adaptive” model enables quick response to changing circumstances Unfortunately, beyond budgeting is only a set of best practices which requires a combination of management tools to be customized29 to firm’s budgeting system for the model to work A snapshot of how various techniques discussed above has been able to attack a specific weakness of traditional budgeting is diagrammatically represented in Figure [6] below Figure [6] A snapshot of attach launched to address weaknesses in traditional budgeting system 29 In reality, only companies that operates in a highly competitive market and have successfully implement various management tools such as BSC, ABM or rolling forecasts, should be ideal candidates for the Beyond Budgeting model 16 2.4 BUDGETING SYSTEM & BUSINESS BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT An appropriate budgeting system for an Organization largely depends on the nature, industry and general business environment of operations This report makes recommendations of appropriate budgeting system for business operating in a stable and dynamic market below 2.4.1 The Stable environment For the purpose of this report, a business is said to operate in a relatively stable environment when there is little changes in method of operations, and in terms of either its products or demand on a year to year basis Apart from been the most compatible budgeting system with other costing approaches and less expensive Traditional budgeting is simpler, easier, more controllable, and flexible than advanced budgeting techniques30 and the most appropriate for a firm operating in a stable market It seems reasonable, drawing from critical evaluation of various budgeting approaches, to recommend traditional budgeting for a firm in a stable environment 2.4.2 Dynamic environment Dynamism in today’s business environment renders a rigid approach to budgeting and budgetary control obsolete [ Adams et al 2003; Hope and Fraser, 1997] Budgeting system must be aligned with organization’s strategic planning on a continuous basis towards responding to the ever-changing needs of customers and compete successfully Tanaka, [1993], say’s that an unpredictable corporate environment makes it difficult to prepare plans in advance, rolling budgeting proves effective as it increases the frequency of feedback as well as budget revisions by shortening the budget period, see figure [3] above There is no doubt of the suitability of rolling budget/ forecasts in the presence of other approaches31, in such environment Therefore, rolling budget is recommended for firm operating in a dynamic market 30 31 The name given to ‘Better budgeting’ and ‘Beyond Budgeting’ techniques Zero-based, Activity based, Kaizen budgeting, flexible budgeting, probabilistic budgeting etc 17 3.0 PART II: WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Fundamentally, there is virtually no other “sensitive” aspect of business organization that boosts performance when efficiently managed and drag an organization prematurely into bankruptcy when inefficiently managed than working capital Studies have shown that 85% of bankrupt companies around the world have been traced to poor working capital management The quote of Naughton32 that “a well-managed working capital can be a competitive advantage to a firm” is a confirmation of the importance of working capital management to the firm The concept of “working capital33”is a fundamental concept in finance literature, though has been a source of controversy34 on the true meaning of working capital as the concept is easily misunderstood even among board members and professionals managers [Bhattacharya, 2006] Hence, discussions of this nature should start clearly with the meaning of working capital The term “Working capital” as used by authors e.g Atrill and Mclaney, [2007]; Watson & Head, [2004]; Arnold, [2004], Proctor, [2006]; pike & Neale, [2003]; Ross & Westerfield, [1999], is simply current assets less current liabilities They added further, that while “gross working capital” is the total investment in current assets, “net working capital” is the term used to describe net investment in short-term assets Managing working capital simply denotes the administration of the firm’s current assets and the financing needed to support current assets Most likely, working capital management will direct impact on corporate profitability and liquidity [Shin & Soenen, 1993] A clear specification of objectives and policies are required to help achieve success 32 Todd R Naughton ,Vice President, Finance Zebra Technologies Corporation 33 The concept was traceable, first to the monumental work of Karl Max’s,”Das Kapital” (1867, cited in Bhattacharya, 2006) Karl Max constracts in his word “constant capital” vs “variable capital” and the working capital as we understand today was originally embedded in his “variable capital” 34 While an accountant will regard working capital as the excess of current assets over current liabilities and call this “net working capital” a financial analyst will consider gross current assets as working capital Both may be right, because concerns of the accountant differ from that of the financial analyst The accountant major concern is arithmetical accuracy of the two sides of the balance sheet while the analyst concerns is to find fund for each items of current assets at such costs and risks that the evolving financial structure remains balanced between the two 18 3.1 THE OBJECTIVE AND COMPONENTS OF WORKING CAPITAL In a typical manufacturing firm like xyz ltd, the basic elements of investment in current asset may includes; inventory of raw materials, work-in-progress, finished goods, debtors, short-term investments and cash while current liabilities [i.e sources of finance] may includes; trade creditors, overdrafts and short-term loans The two main objectives of working capital management are; to maintain sufficient liquidity35 for effective and efficient functioning and to improve the profitability of the business36 [Watson and Head, [2004] In addition, minimization of risk and maximizing returns on assets from current assets still fall under the objective [Arnold, 2004] Unfortunately, liquidity and profitability objectives37 are not easily achieved at the same time as both often conflicts in practice On this ground, Watson and Head, [2004], argued that while liquidity is needed for a firm to operate, a firm may choose to hold more cash than is needed for transactional motive38 [ Keynes, 1936] This report emphasis on the concept of time value of money and that Cash kept in safe generate no returns which otherwise should have earned should it be deposited in a bank for a time period Finance managers should strive for a balance between liquidity and profitability For meeting day-to-day cash flow needs; pay wages and salaries when they fall due; pay creditors; pay taxes and providers of capital and ensure the long term survival of the business entity 36 Adequate liquidity & profitability [Pass and pike, 1984; Arnold, 2004; Watson & Head, 2004; Proctor, 2006; Atrill and Mclaney, 2007; University of Sunderland, 2008), are the main objectives of working capital management 37 There is a trade-off between the two primary objectives of liquidity and profitability in practice 35 38 J.M Keynes (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money available at http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ 19 Working capital Policies and Principles Experience has shown that firms only achieve these objectives with clear working capital policy and principles [i.e Principle of Risk variation39 , cost of capital40 , equity position,41 and maturity of payment42] regarding the quantum of various components of working capital required as depicted in figure below [Kavitha, 2007] The level of investment in working capital is directly dependent on the firms policies regarding the level of current assets considered sufficiently and reasonably safe, in terms of risk and returns [Proctor, 2006; Pike & Neale, 2003; Watson & Head, 2004] Figure [a] Principles of working capital management 39 [b] working capital policies The principle holds that the inability of a firm to meet its short term obligations, as they fall due breeds risk and stresses the inverse relationship between the degree of risk and return(profitability) Management who prefers to minimize risk by maintaining a higher level of current assets or working capital end up making low returns 40 The principle of cost of capital indicated the existence of a strong correlation between risks and cost of capital Stressing further, that the higher the risk the lower is the cost and lowers the risk, higher is the cost of capital Management should always strike to achieve a proper balance between these two 41 The Principles of equity position is concerned with planning the total investment in Current Asset in such that every pounds invested in the current assets should contribute to the net worth of the firm 42 This principle holds the need for adequate planning for sources of finance for working capital and that firms should make every effort to relate maturities of payment to its flow of internally generated funds 20 Firms may adopt conservative43, moderate44 and aggressive45 working capital policies [see figure 2b] above, depending on risk taking capability as adoption of any of the approaches specific impact on corporate profitability 3.2 Working capital cycle of a XYZ ltd Working capital cycle is the period of time which elapses between the point at which cash begins to be expended on the production of a product and the collection of cash from a customer46 [Watson & Head, 2004] Figure [3] below depict a typical working capital cycle of a manufacturing firm While the upper part of the diagram in blue boxes shows a simplified chain of events in xyz, each of the boxes can be seen as tanks through which funds constantly flow into and out of them resulting from daily activities Figure Source: adapted from [Arnold, 2004] Figure [4] working capital cycle of manufacturing firm 43 In conservative policy, firms prefers to hold more cash on hands and finance part of the current assets with long term funds which are more expensive This actually leads to low-risk but with associated low returns as excess cash in hand yield no returns Firms may decide to adopt approach called matching policy, which simply matches’ assets and liabilities ie long term sources to finance fixed assets and permanent current assets and short term financing for temporary current assets 44 Firms may decide to adopt approach called matching [moderate] policy, which simply matches’ assets and liabilities ie long term sources to finance fixed assets and permanent current assets and short term financing for temporary current assets 45 When a firm adopts aggressive policy, it takes high-risk where short term funds are used to a very high degree to finance all current and even part of fixed assets and the returns are usually high 21 3.3 Improving the Working capital cycle of Xyz Ltd Improvement in working capital cycle of xyz ltd requires efficient management of the various components of working capital This report emphasis seriously, on the implications of overcapitalization and overtrading as shown in figure [3] below Figure [5] implications of overcapitalization and undercapitalization 3.3.1 Managing inventory One of the most significant components of working capital of xyz with considerable impacts on corporate profitability is the inventory Manufacturing concern hold three classes of inventory namely; raw material, semi-finished goods and finished goods A fundamental question in 22 inventory management is why firms hold stock? A good inventory management should address strategic inventory management questions shown on figure Xyz holds inventories for several motives, but the most common is that of meeting the day-today production and customers demand requirements Holding inventory is associated with costs So, there is always a trade –off of risk of too low and tool high inventory To improve the working capital cycle, requires efficient inventory management which in turn needs, appropriate forecast for future customer demand, good recording & re-ordering system, applying the use of models[ e.g e.g EOQ, JIT, ERP,MRP etc] to strike a balance between inventory trade-off as shown in figure[5] Figure [5] Inventory trade-off [Risk of too low or too high 23 3.3.2 Managing of Debtors Strategically, xyz may have allowed credit to their customers in attempt to the achieve corporate objective of gaining good market share and in order to improve working capital cycle, efficient debtors’ management which aim at striking a balancing the risk of illiquidity as consequence of reasonable amount in customers hands and losing customers, should address certain questions47 xyz policy of giving customers cash discount encourages prompt (earlier) collection of receivables, the use of factor agents where necessary and analysis of debtors and probably stop the supply of more goods to customers with load of excuses Xyz should always make provision for bad and doubtful debts for the purpose of planning while finance managers are warn of the use of factoring agent in debt collection for it implications 3.3.3 Cash management The fundamental question48 of why xyz ltd holds cash saw what is regarded as a convincing answer in the work of J.M Keynes [1936]49 The Keynesian economists posit that, firms prefer to hold part of their assets in the form of cash for what they described as “transactionary”, speculative” and precautionary50” motive Cash is the most sensitive components of working capital of firms of all kinds and may be held for reasons identified above To improve cash inflow and outflow, models51, such as upper & lower limit cash balance, cash budget are essentially good cash management tools Maynard Rafuse, [1996]52, noted that improving working capital cycle by delaying payment to creditors is counter-productive and has implication of reducing xyz credit standing with its 47 Do we allow all customers credit? Who should receive credit? Are there criteria for checking credit worthiness of customers? What is potential customers score for 5Cs of credit? What is the maximum credit period allowed to customers? How much credit we allow? How we encourage prompt payment? 48 Why we prefer to hold part our assets in the form cash? How much cash should be held? Does amount of cash held impact on profitability? Studies have shown that cash management policies of successful firms tend to provide answers to these questions 49J.M Keynes (1936), The General Theory available at http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ 50 According to Keynesian economists, transactionary motives means holding cash for day-to-day operations, speculative motives denote holding cash for profit reason and precautionary motives is holding cash for emergency in the future 51 Exercising control over inflows and outflows of cash balance with models such as: upper and lower limit, cash budgeting model; cash operating cycles models are good means of enhancing cash management 52 Managing Director, Bennecon Limited, Process Analysis and Stock Management Consultants, London, UK available @ http: //www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight 24 suppliers He added that, inventory reduction generates system-wide financial improvements Although caution must be taken in reducing the level of inventory as consideration should be given to current customers demand Xyz can opt for earlier payment from customers and delay to make payments on the last due dates or negotiate for extension with their suppliers all aimed at boosting cash flows In period of surplus cash, xyz should invest in marketable securities and sell the securities or arrange to borrow when cash shortage are envisaged through the cash budget Outlined in figure [3] are, other techniques for improving cash management [Atrill and Mclaney, 2007; Proctor, 2006] Operating cash cycle Cash operating cycle is basically, the time lapse between cash out and cash in from sales The shorter the cash operating cycle the better for xyz ltd [see figure below] Source: [Atrill and Mclaney, 2007 p 410] Figure Operating cash cycle 25 While Besley and Brigham, (2005) confirm that, the average cash conversion cycle of European firms are twice that of US firms, summary of strategic approaches employed in reducing the operating cash cycle53 are highlighted in figure appendix 3.3.4 Managing trade payables Managing the relationship between xyz ltd, their suppliers and other sundry creditors desires serious attention as an important element of working capital cycle According to Maynard, [1996], creditors’ management is essentially a Darwinian situation54 To improve the working capital cycle, creditors management need to optimize the use of trade payables otherwise known as interest-free source of finance or what Brealey et al, (2007), described as implicit loan from suppliers Negotiating a long period of payment with suppliers, making payments on the due date and negotiating a better credit terms are steps towards improving the trade payables [see figure 3] The strategy of delaying payment to creditors may reduce xyz credit rating as suppliers may simply misconstrue the financial situation of xyz for a symptom of working capital deterioration which may brings drastic restrictions on supplies Care must be taken in employing delay tactics with suppliers 4.0 Conclusion Efficient working capital cycle lies at the heart of successful firms, playing increasing role towards shareholders wealth maximization Xyz manufacturing limited can successively improves its working capital cycle by optimizing inventory; recievables, cash and payables 53 suggestions on ways to reduce the length of cash operating cycle includes; lowering the level of inventories held, imposing tighter credit control, offering discounts, charging interests on overdue accounts, and extending the period of credit taken to pay suppliers could all help 54 Darwinian situation, according to Maynard, the survival of the fittest Large companies enforce their terms with smaller com panies, who in turn enforce their terms with those smaller yet 26 References ACCA, (2007), P5 Advanced performance management, Emily Wolf international, ifp Atrill Peter,(2003),Financial management for non-specialists, Essex, financial times Prentice Hall Atrill P & McLaney E,(2007) Management Accounting for Decision-makers, 5thedn.Essex, financial times Prentice Hall Anthony, R.N., Govindarajan, V (2003), Management Control Systems, 11th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY Brealey, Myers & Marcus (2007), Fundamentals of corporate finance, Int’l ed New York, McGraw Hill Brigham & Huoston,(2004) Fundamentals of financial management, 13th Ed Thomson South-western Bhattacharya, H (2004) Working Capital Management: Strategies and Techniques PHI Learning Pvt Ltd J Birnberg, C Snodgrass (1988), "Culture and control", Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol 13 pp.447 - 464 S Baiman (1982), "Agency research in managerial accounting", Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol pp.154 - 226 Babbini Christian, (1999) Reality Check is traditional budgeting under siege? CMA Management [Online] Available at:http://www.allbusiness.com/accounting/budget/363030-1.html (Accessed 28 April, 2009) Bhattacharya, H (2004) Working Capital Management: Strategies and Techniques PHI Learning Pvt Ltd Bill and Trefor, (2004), Business Finance: A value-Based Approach, Essex Pearson ltd Bunce, P., Fraser, R., Woodcock, L (1995) ‘Advanced Budgeting’, a journey to advanced management systems Management Accounting Research, [online] 6, 253-265 Belinda Steffan (2008), Essential management http://books.google.co.uk [Accessed 5th May, 2009] accounting, [e-book] available CIMA, (2006) Management Accounting- Performance Evaluation 2nd Ed BPP Professional Education CIMA & ICAEW, (2004) Better Budgeting Faculty of Finance and Management [Online report] Available at: www.icaew.co.uk/fmfac (Assessed 2nd May, 2009) 27 at Drury, Collin (2008) Management and Cost Accounting 7th edn London, Cengage Learning EMEA Drury Colin (2000) Management Accounting 5th ed London Thomson Emmanuel, Otley & Merchant,(1992),Readings control(edited),London,Chapman & Hall in accounting for management Eruns, W.J and J.H Waterhouse,( 1975) "Budgetary Control and Organization Structure," Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1975) pp 177-204 Ekholm & Walin, (2000) Is the annual budget really dead?, The Eureopean Accounting Review vol 9, No.o 4, 519-539 Galbraith, J.( 1977), Designing Complex Organizations; Addison- Wesley Glen Arnold, (2002), corporate financial management, 2ed Pearson ltd, Essex Garrison etal(2008), Managerial Accounting:12th ed nNew York, Mcgraw-Hill Horngren, Bhimani, Datar & Foster,(2005), Management Accounting & cost accounting, rd ed Essex, financial times Prentice Hall Horngren, Sundem & Stratton,(2005), introduction to Management Accounting, 13th ed New Jersey ,Pearson education limited Hopwood , A.G., An Accounting System and Managerial Behaviour (London: Saxon House, 1973) Hope, J & Fraser, R (2003) Beyond budgeting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA Johnson & Scholes (1998) Expolring strategic financial management ;Essex pearson education ltd Johnson & Kaplan, (1987) Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting, Harvard business press Kaplan and Norton, (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action[e-book] available at http://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumKaplanNorton96.htm [accessed 16 th may , 2009] Kemp & Dunbar, (2003), Budgeting for http://books.google.co.uk[Accessed [1oth May, 2009] Kavitha, (2007) Understanding working capital @ www.indianmba.com/Faculty_Column/FC547/fc547.html 28 managers, [e-book] available at Merchant K., Van der Stede W (2003), Management control systems, Pearson Education, Prentice HallFinancial Times, Harlow, England) Mohan Nair,(2004),Essential of Balanced Scorecard, New Jersey, John wiley M Lindsay & T Libby, (2006), Svenska Handelsbanken: Accomplishing radical decentralization through “Beyond Budgeting” [online] available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm [accessed on 20 April, 2009] Merville J, Tavis A (1973) “Optimal working Capital Policies” The Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, Vol 8, No.1 University of Washington School of Business Administration Myers, R (2001) ‘Budgets on a Roll’ Journal of Accountancy [online journal] (192,6) pp41-46, available at www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2001/Dec/BudgetsOnARoll.htm [accessed 12th May, 2009] Ray Proctor, (2006) Managerial accounting for Business Decisions, 2nd ed Financial times press Pike & Neale, (2003) Corporate Finance & investment: Decisions and strategies 4th ed Hertfordshire, prentice Hall Europe Ross & Westerfield, [1999], Corporate finance 5th ed Singapore, McGraw Hill Shin H & Soenen L (1998) Efficiency of Working Capital Management and Corporate Profitability, Financial Practice and Education,37-45 Smith, K (1980) Profitability versus liquidity tradeoffs in working capital management: West Publishing Company Wildavsky, A Swedlow, B White, J (2006) Budgeting and Governing Transaction Publishers Watson and Head, (2004), Corporate Finance; principles and practice, 3rd ed, Essex pearson Education ltd 29 [...]... journey to advanced management systems Management Accounting Research, [online] 6, 253-265 Belinda Steffan (2008), Essential management http://books.google.co.uk [Accessed 5th May, 2009] accounting, [e-book] available CIMA, (2006) Management Accounting- Performance Evaluation 2nd Ed BPP Professional Education CIMA & ICAEW, (2004) Better Budgeting Faculty of Finance and Management [Online report] Available... 2009) 27 at Drury, Collin (2008) Management and Cost Accounting 7th edn London, Cengage Learning EMEA Drury Colin (2000) Management Accounting 5th ed London Thomson Emmanuel, Otley & Merchant,(1992),Readings control(edited),London,Chapman & Hall in accounting for management Eruns, W.J and J.H Waterhouse,( 1975) "Budgetary Control and Organization Structure," Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1975)... budget really dead?, The Eureopean Accounting Review vol 9, No.o 4, 519-539 Galbraith, J.( 1977), Designing Complex Organizations; Addison- Wesley Glen Arnold, (2002), corporate financial management, 2ed Pearson ltd, Essex Garrison etal(2008), Managerial Accounting: 12th ed nNew York, Mcgraw-Hill Horngren, Bhimani, Datar & Foster,(2005), Management Accounting & cost accounting, 3 rd ed Essex, financial... Huoston,(2004) Fundamentals of financial management, 13th Ed Thomson South-western Bhattacharya, H (2004) Working Capital Management: Strategies and Techniques PHI Learning Pvt Ltd J Birnberg, C Snodgrass (1988), "Culture and control", Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol 13 pp.447 - 464 S Baiman (1982), "Agency research in managerial accounting" , Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol 1 pp.154 -... yet 26 References ACCA, (2007), P5 Advanced performance management, Emily Wolf international, ifp Atrill Peter,(2003),Financial management for non-specialists, Essex, financial times Prentice Hall Atrill P & McLaney E,(2007) Management Accounting for Decision-makers, 5thedn.Essex, financial times Prentice Hall Anthony, R.N., Govindarajan, V (2003), Management Control Systems, 11th ed., McGraw-Hill, New... Horngren, Sundem & Stratton,(2005), introduction to Management Accounting, 13th ed New Jersey ,Pearson education limited Hopwood , A.G., An Accounting System and Managerial Behaviour (London: Saxon House, 1973) Hope, J & Fraser, R (2003) Beyond budgeting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA Johnson & Scholes (1998) Expolring strategic financial management ;Essex pearson education ltd Johnson & Kaplan,... Manufacturing concern hold three classes of inventory namely; raw material, semi-finished goods and finished goods A fundamental question in 22 inventory management is why firms hold stock? A good inventory management should address strategic inventory management questions shown on figure 3 Xyz holds inventories for several motives, but the most common is that of meeting the day-today production and customers... siege? CMA Management [Online] Available at:http://www.allbusiness.com /accounting/ budget/363030-1.html (Accessed 28 April, 2009) Bhattacharya, H (2004) Working Capital Management: Strategies and Techniques PHI Learning Pvt Ltd Bill and Trefor, (2004), Business Finance: A value-Based Approach, Essex Pearson ltd Bunce, P., Fraser, R., Woodcock, L (1995) ‘Advanced Budgeting’, a journey to advanced management. .. & Head, 2004] Figure 2 [a] Principles of working capital management 39 [b] working capital policies The principle holds that the inability of a firm to meet its short term obligations, as they fall due breeds risk and stresses the inverse relationship between the degree of risk and return(profitability) Management who prefers to minimize risk by maintaining a higher level of current assets or working... cycle, requires efficient inventory management which in turn needs, appropriate forecast for future customer demand, good recording & re-ordering system, applying the use of models[ e.g e.g EOQ, JIT, ERP,MRP etc] to strike a balance between inventory trade-off as shown in figure[5] Figure [5] Inventory trade-off [Risk of too low or too high 23 3.3.2 Managing of Debtors Strategically, xyz may have allowed ... business environment The quest to overcome the weakness in traditional management accounting system gave birth to Strategic Management accounting2 ” Lying critically, at the heart of the managerial control... shares similar views, that traditional management accounting systems is incompatible with modern production systems The notion of strategic management accounting centre’s around linking business... to advanced management systems Management Accounting Research, [online] 6, 253-265 Belinda Steffan (2008), Essential management http://books.google.co.uk [Accessed 5th May, 2009] accounting,