Numerical simulation of sediment transport and morphological evolution

293 401 0
Numerical simulation of sediment transport and morphological evolution

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION LIN QUANHONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2009 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION LIN QUANHONG (B.Eng. and M.Eng., Tianjin University, China) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2009 To My Parents i Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisors, Professor Cheong Hin Fatt and Professor Lin Pengzhi, for their guidance, support and encouragement throughout my study at National University of Singapore. Numerous meetings and discussions are the origins of the research ideas and the directions of the way going forward. Their attitude for the research will lead me further in the future career. The time spent with me and the patience allowing me to improve myself should be appreciated. Without them, this thesis would not have been possible. I also like to thank my previous supervisor, Professor Zhang Qinghe at Tianjin University during my study for the Master of Engineering from 2001 to 2004. His knowledge and virtue are always worthy of my respect. I have also benefited from the generosity of many others and special thanks go to the following persons. The numerical model developed in this study is partially based on the PhD thesis of Dr. Yong-Sik Cho at Cornell University. And the program for the turbulence spectrum analysis was generously provided by Dr. Ren-Chieh Lien at the University of Washington, who also gave me valuable guidance in this research field. In addition, analytical solutions of the shock wave for the numerical testing of the morphological evolution equation were kindly provided by Dr. Wen Long at University of Maryland. Their generosity is appreciated. I would like to acknowledge the Research Scholarship provided by National University of Singapore from 2004 to 2008. I am grateful for the financial support from the Research Engineer position provided by Professor Cheong Hin Fatt from 2008 to 2009. ii I am happy to thank Mr. Zhang Dan, Mr. Zhang Wenyu, Dr. Liu Dongming, Mr. Chen Haoliang, Mr. Sun Yabin, Mr. Xu Haihua, Dr. Ma Peifeng, Dr. Anuja Karunarathna, Dr. Pradeep Fernando, Dr. Cheng Yonggang, Mr. Shen Wei, Mr. Chen Zhuo, Mr. Lim Kian Yew, Mr. Satria Negara, Dr. Gu Hanbin, and Dr. Zhang Jinfeng, for their friendship and valuable discussion during the study. Special thanks go to Dr. Wang Zengrong, for his helpful discussion about the signal analysis with me. Thanks are extended to Mr. Krishna and Ms. Norela for their help between office and laboratory and to Mr. Semawi and Mr. Roger for their assistance my experiments at Hydraulics Laboratory. Last but not least, I would like to express the gratitude from my heart to my parents and my sister, who have been giving me the unconditional love in my life. I also like to thank my wife for her care, patience and love. I could not finish my study without the support from all of them iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Table of Contents iv Summary viii List of Tables x List of Figures xi List of Symbols xx Introduction 1.1 Background of Sediment Transport Study …………………………………….1 1.2 Background of Shallow-Water Equations Models …………………………… 1.3 Review on Considerations of Slope Effect on Sediment Transport … .……12 1.4 Objective and Scope of Present Study ………………………………… .……16 Mathematical Formulation of the Numerical Model 2.1 2.2 2.3 20 Shallow-Water Equations …………………………………………………….20 2.1.1 Continuity equation …………………………………………………… 20 2.1.2 Momentum equation ………………………………………………… 22 Depth-Averaged kˆ  ˆ Turbulence Closure ………………………………….26 2.2.1 Three-dimensional k   model ……………………………………… 26 2.2.2 Depth-averaged kˆ  ˆ model ………………………………………… 28 Sediment Transport Model ……………………………………………………30 2.3.1 Some parameters for sediment transport ……………………………… 31 2.3.2 Bed load transport equations ………………………………………… 33 2.3.3 Suspended load transport equation …………………………………… 34 2.3.4 Sediment deposition function ………………………………………… 35 2.3.5 Sediment entrainment function ……………………………………… 36 2.4 Morphological Change Model ………………………………………………38 2.5 Correction for Bed Shear Stress ………………………………………………38 iv 2.6 2.7 2.8 Effect of Bed Slope on Sediment Transport …………………………………44 2.6.1 Effect of bed slope on critical shear stress…………………………… 45 2.6.2 Van Rijn (1989)’s method…………………………………………… 49 2.6.3 Application to some cases…………………………………………… 50 2.6.4 Verification of the slope effect equation……………………………… 51 2.6.5 Modification of sediment transport direction………………………… 53 2.6.6 Procedure of considering the effect of bed slope……………………… 58 Initial and Boundary Conditions ………………………………………………59 2.7.1 Initial conditions ……………………………………………………… 59 2.7.2 Boundary conditions ………………………………………………… 60 Summary of Governing Equations …………………………………………….62 Numerical Implementation 3.1 65 Model Implementation …………….…………………………………….… 65 3.1.1 Sketch of computational domain ……………………………………… 65 3.1.2 Shallow-water equations ……………………………………………… 67 3.1.3 Depth-averaged kˆ  ˆ equations ……………………………………… 71 3.1.4 Suspended load transport equation …………………………………… 74 3.1.5 Morphological evolution equation …………………………………… 76 3.1.6 Computational cycle ………………………………………………… 82 3.2 Stability Analysis ……….……………………………………………….…….82 3.3 Special Numerical Treatments ……………… ……………………………….85 3.3.1 Boundary condition for kˆ  ˆ equations on solid boundary ………… 85 3.3.2 Approximate calculation method for gradually varied beds ………… 86 Numerical Testing 4.1 4.2 88 1D Hydrodynamic Module …………….………………………………….… 88 4.1.1 Solitary wave propagation …………………………………………… 88 4.1.2 Idealized dam-break …………………………………………………… 95 4.1.3 Partial dam-break ……………………………………………………… 99 4.1.4 Hydraulic jump ……………………………………………………… 103 2D Hydrodynamic Module …………….……………………………….… 106 v 4.3 4.4 4.2.1 Sloshing in a tank …………………………………………………… 106 4.2.2 Uniform flow in a straight channel ………………………………… 112 4.2.3 Recirculating flow near a groyne …………………………………… 114 Convection-Diffusion Equation ……….……………………………….…….120 4.3.1 1D Gaussian hump …………………………………………………… 120 4.3.2 2D Gaussian hump …………………………………………………… 123 4.3.3 2D point source …………………………………………………… 127 1D Morphological Equation ……………… ……………………………….131 Sediment Transport in 1D Situations 136 5.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….136 5.2 Sediment Transport in a Trench …………………………………………….137 5.3 5.2.1 Experimental setup …………………………………………………….137 5.2.2 Velocity and concentration fields ……………… .………………… 141 5.2.3 Verification of approximate calculation method .………………… 150 5.2.4 Calculations of morphological evolution .……… ………………… 153 5.2.5 Sensitivity analysis .……… ………………………………………… 158 Sediment Transport over a Dune …………………………………………….164 5.3.1 Experimental setup .……… ………………………………………… 164 5.3.2 Experimental results .……… ………………………………………… 166 5.3.3 Numerical simulation and results .……… ………………………… 169 5.3.4 Sensitivity analysis.……… ………………………………………… 172 Turbulent Flows and Morphological Evolution in Channels with Abrupt CrossSection Change 174 6.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….174 6.2 Turbulent Flow in a Channel with an Abrupt Expansion ………………….177 6.3 6.2.1 Laboratory experiments ……………………………………………….177 6.2.2 Analysis of experimental data ………………………………………….179 6.2.3 Numerical simulation ………………………………………………….187 6.2.4 Results and discussions ……………………………………………….188 Morphological Evolution in a Channel with an Abrupt Expansion ………….195 6.3.1 Laboratory experiments ……………………………………………….195 vi 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.3.2 Experimental results ………………………………………………….196 6.3.3 Numerical simulation ………………………………………………….210 6.3.4 Results and discussions ……………………………………………….210 Turbulent Flow in a Channel with an Abrupt Contraction ………………….211 6.4.1 Laboratory experiments ……………………………………………….211 6.4.2 Numerical simulation ………………………………………………….213 6.4.3 Results and discussions ……………………………………………….214 Morphological Evolution in a Channel with an Abrupt Contraction ……….221 6.5.1 Laboratory experiments ……………………………………………….221 6.5.2 Experimental results ………………………………………………….221 6.5.3 Numerical simulation ………………………………………………….228 6.5.4 Results and discussions ……………………………………………….228 Morphological Evolution in a Channel Consisting of a Contraction and an Expansion …………………………………………………………………….234 6.6.1 Laboratory experiments ……………………………………………….234 6.6.2 Numerical simulation ………………………………………………….236 6.6.3 Results and discussions ……………………………………………….237 Summaries ……………………………………………………………………246 Conclusions and Future Work 249 7.1 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………249 7.2 Recommendations for Future Work …………………………………………253 7.2.1 Cohesive sediment transport ………………………………………….253 7.2.2 Bed evolution in channel bends ……………………………………….254 7.2.3 Bed evolution in dam-break problems ……………………………….254 References 256 vii Summary A two-dimensional depth-averaged numerical model has been developed to simulate long-term sediment transport and morphological evolution. Furthermore, considering the fact that the detailed experimental studies on the turbulent flows involving sediment transport and morphological evolution are few, a series of experiments have been conducted in the laboratory flume to provide valuable measured data for purposes of model validation. The numerical model consists of three modules: the hydrodynamic module, the sediment transport module and the morphological evolution module. Firstly, the hydrodynamic conditions are computed by solving the shallow-water equations with the depth-averaged kˆ − εˆ turbulence closure. Based on the flow conditions, the suspended sediment concentration is evaluated by solving the convection-diffusion equation while the bed load transport is predicted from an empirical equation. Finally, the bed evolution is calculated using fifth-order accurate WENO (Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory) scheme. In order to improve the prediction, the bed shear stress obtained from the traditional Manning’s formula is corrected according to the secondary flow effect with the assumption of a “triangular model” for the main flow and the cross flow components. To simulate the sediment transport on the sloping bed more realistically, the effect of the bed slope, i.e., the effect of gravity on the sediment particle, is incorporated into the model. Both the critical shear stress for the sediment incipient motion and the sediment transport direction are corrected according to the local bed slope. In addition, utilizing the difference of the stability criteria between flow and sediment transport calculations, an viii slope effect will smooth the bed with relatively high gradient and make the simulation more realistic. In addition, the approximate calculation method proposed for the gradually varied beds has been validated in the trench case. The numerical results have shown that this approximate method will significantly improve the computational efficiency and at the same time keep the results with almost same accuracy. Therefore, it is a very promising method for simulating the gradually varied beds. After the studies of the one-dimensional situations, the studies of the two-dimensional situations covering the turbulent flows, the sediment transport and the morphological evolution in the channels with changed cross-section were carried out. Firstly, the flow field in a channel with an abrupt expansion has been studied in the laboratory flume. Three-dimensional velocity components were measured using MicroADV throughout the whole flow field. Based on the collected velocity data, the three-dimensional mean velocity components and the turbulent kinematic energy were calculated and the dissipation rate of TKE was estimated using the spectrum analysis to find out the Kolmogorov inertial subrange. Furthermore, the turbulent viscosity was calculated according to its definition. After obtaining all these mean and turbulent flow quantities for the whole three-dimensional space in the flow field, their depth-averaged values were calculated based on the data within the measurement depth. From the measurements, it was found that the main flow is in longitudinal direction with much smaller transverse component. Due to the presence of the obstacle corner, a recirculating region forms behind the expansion position and the turbulence has very strong intensity within this region. In addition to the experimental study, the numerical simulation was conducted for the flow filed in the expanded channel using the present model. The numerical results have shown 251 to be very encouraging when compared with the experimental data in terms of both mean flow and turbulent flow fields. Secondly, the bed load transport and morphological evolution in the same expanded channel were investigated experimentally under the same flow conditions. The main phenomenon observed in the expanded channel was the sand deposition due to the slowdown of the flow and a sand hump forming across the flume obliquely. The hump evolved in both longitudinal and transverse directions and the whole procedure which lasted for eight hours has been recorded by profiling the bed elevations hourly. In addition to the laboratory study, the present model was also applied for modeling the morphological evolution in the sudden-expanded channel. The numerical results gave the reasonably good prediction for the evolution trend although the deposited hump height was underestimated. Thirdly, the flow field in a channel with an abrupt contraction has been studied in the laboratory flume. Similarly to the one in the channel with an abrupt expansion, detailed measurements have been carried out in the sudden-contracted channel for the threedimensional velocities from which the mean velocity and the turbulence quantities as well as their depth-averaged values were obtained. The longitudinal component of the flow was found to be retarded by the obstruction on the one side and accelerated on the other side while the transverse one has very small magnitude. The turbulence field has extraordinarily strong intensity in the regions adjacent to the contraction wall in the narrow channel. The numerical results from the present model agree well with the measurements in terms of both mean and turbulent flow fields except some underestimations on those high turbulences. 252 Fourthly, the morphological evolution in the contracted channel was investigated in the laboratory flume. Under the flow condition, the sand bed was scoured due to the sudden contraction of the flume cross-section and a cone-shaped hole formed around the contraction position. In the modeling, the evolution of the scour hole was simulated accurately with the help of the bed shear stress correction. Lastly, the hydrodynamic conditions and the morphological evolution in a channel consisting of a contraction and an expansion were studied numerically using the present model. The available experimental data and the numerical results from 3D model were used for comparisons. The present model gives successful predictions for the water surface depression in the contracted channel and the velocity field. In addition, reasonable agreements have been shown for simulation of the sand bed deformations including both a scour ditch and a dune. 7.2 Recommendations for Future Work 7.2.1 Cohesive sediment transport In the present model, only cohesionless sediment transport has been considered. In the natural environment, fine-grained and cohesive suspended sediment plays a very important role in the water quality and the growth of ocean creatures. In order to increase the model’s applicability, cohesive sediment transport can be included. For the sediment with grain-size less than 63 µ m , a single particle has very low settling velocity and can be suspended in the water for a long time. However, the cohesive properties of the fine sediments can make them flocculate and form large aggregates or flocs which have much larger settling velocity than a single particle. There are many 253 factors affecting the settling velocity of flocs, including sediment particle size, water salinity, turbulence intensity and sediment concentration. On the other hand, after the sediment settles down onto the bed, the consolidation of the bed will occur associated with different time scales. With accurate description of the settling velocity, the processes of the flocculation and aggregation, deposition, consolidation and re-suspension are necessary to be represented in the numerical simulation of the cohesive sediment transport. 7.2.2 Bed evolution in channel bends Flow field and morphological evolution in the straight channels with changed crosssection have been studied in Chapter 6. The situation will become much more complex in channel bends as the water flows along the curve. Flow shows strong spiral characteristic due to the superposition of the secondary flow on the forward movement of the water. Therefore, the sediment transport is determined to be much more complex than in the straight channels. Due to the similarity to the alluvial natural rivers, the morphological evolution in the channel bends is of importance to be studied. Quite abundant experiments with different layout of bend have been carried out to study the bed evolution in channel bends, e.g., Zeng (1982) and Yen (1970). These provide valuable data base for the validation of the numerical model. 7.2.3 Bed evolution in dam-break problems In Chapter 4, some numerical testing for the flows in the ideal dam-break and the laboratory partial dam-break has been conducted using the present model. When the channel bed is movable, large amount of the sediment will be eroded and then transported 254 within a short time and the morphological change will become very significant. Due to the strong interaction between flow and sediment during the dam-break, the present model which is the uncoupled one with simplified governing equations will not be able to make satisfactory prediction for the problem. Therefore, the model coupling flow motion and sediment transport is necessary for the accurate description of the physical phenomenon. In addition, due to the constructions of the dams, this kind of model will have extensive application in predicting the environmental impact of the dam-break and should be developed in the future study. 255 References Abad, J.D., Buscaglia, G.C. and Garcia, M.H., 2008. 2D stream hydrodynamic, sediment transport and bed morphology model for engineering applications, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1443-1459. Abbott, M.B. and Larsen, J., 1985. Modelling circulations in depth-integrated flows Part 2: A reconciliation, J. Hydraul. Res., 23(5), 397-420. Abbott, M.B., Larsen, J. and Tao, J., 1985. Modelling circulations in depth-integrated flows Part 1: The accumulation of the evidence, J. Hydraul. Res., 23(4), 309-326. Apsley, D.D. and Stansby, P.K., 2008. Bed-load sediment transport on large slopes: Model formulation and implementation within a RANS solver, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(10), 1440-1451. Aureli, F., Maranzoni, A, Mignosa, P. and Ziveri, C., 2008. Dam-break flows: Acquisition of experimental data through an imaging technique and 2D numerical modeling, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(8), 1089-1101. Babarutsi, S. and Chu, V.H., 1998. Modeling transverse mixing layer in shallow openchannel flows, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(7), 718-727. Babarutsi, S., Ganoulis, J. and Chu, V.H., 1989. Experimental investigation of shallow recirculating flows, J. Hydraul. Eng., 115(7), 906-924. Babarutsi, S., Nassiri, M. and Chu, V.H., 1996. Computation of shallow recirculating flow dominated by friction, J. Hydraul. Eng., 122(7), 367-372. Bellos, C. and Hrissanthou, V., 1998. Numerical simulation of sediment transport following a dam break, Water Resour. Manage, 12(6), 397-407. Biglari, B. and Sturm, T.W., 1998. Numerical modeling of flow around bridge abutments in compound channel, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(2), 156-163. Bravo, H.R. and Holly Jr., F.M., 1996. Turbulence model for depth-averaged flows in navigation installations, J. Hydraul. Eng., 122(12), 718-727. Brooks, H.N., 1963. Discussion of “Boundary shear stress in curved trapezoidal channels”, by Ippen, A.T., Drinker, P.A. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 89(3), 327-333. Cao, Z., 1997. Turbulent bursting-based sediment entrainment function, J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(3), 233-236. 256 Cao, Z., Pender, G., Wallis, S. and Carling, P., 2004. Computational dam-break hydraulics over erodible sediment bed, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(7), 689-703. Celik, I. and Rodi, W., 1985. Sediment transport under steady, non-equilibrium situations, Euromech192: Transport of Suspended Solids in Open Channels, Munich, F.R.Germany, 97-100. Celik, I. and Rodi, W., 1988. Modeling suspended sediment transport in nonequilibrium situations, J. Hydraul. Eng., 114(10), 1157-1191. Celik, I. and Rodi, W., 1991. Suspended sediment-transport capacity for open channel flow, J. Hydraul. Eng., 117(2), 191-204. Chapman, R.S. and Kuo, C.Y., 1985. Application of the two-equation k   turbulence model to a two-dimensional, steady, free surface flow problem with separation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 5(3), 257-268. Cho, Y.-S., 1995. Numerical Simulations of Tsunami Propagation and Run-Up. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Chu, V.H. and Babarutsi, S., 1988. Confinement and bed-friction effects in shallow turbulent mixing layers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 114(10), 1257-1274. Cui, Y., Parker, G., Lisle, T., Pizzuto, J.E. and Dodd, A.M., 2005. More on the evolution of bed material waves in alluvial rivers, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 107-114. Damgaard, J.S., Whitehouse, R.J.S. and Soulsby, R.L., 1997, Bed-load sediment transport on steep longitudinal slopes, J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(12), 1130-1138. Dean, R.G. and Dalrymple, R.A., 1991. Water Wave Mechanics for Engineers and Scientists. Advances Series on Ocean Engineering (Ed. Liu, P.L.-F.), 2, World Scientific, Singapore. Dey, S, and Debnath, K., 2001. Sediment pickup on streamwise sloping beds, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 127(1), 39-43. Duan, J.G. and Julien, P.Y., 2005. Numerical simulation of the inception of channel meandering, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 30, 1093-1110. Durst, F. and Rastogi, A.K., 1979. Theoretical and experimental investigations of turbulent flows with separation, Turbulent Shear Flows I, Springer-Verlag, 208-219. Etheridge, D.W. and Kemp, P.H., 1978. Measurements of turbulent flow downstream of a rearward-facing step, J. Fluid Mech., 86(3), 545-566. Galappatti, G. and Vreugdenhil, C.B., 1985. A depth-integrated model for suspended sediment transport, J. Hydraul. Res., 23(4), 359-377. 257 Garcia, M. and Parker, G., 1991. Entrainment of bed sediment into suspension, J. Hydraul. Eng., 117(4), 414-435. Gharangik, A.M. and Chaudhry, M.H., 1991. Numerical simulation of hydraulic jump, J. Hydraul. Eng., 117(9), 1195-1211. Gonzalez, E.P., Marques, J.F., Diaz-Pache, F.S.-T, Agudo, J.P. and Gomez, L.C., 2008. Experimental validation of a sediment transport two-dimensional depth-averaged numerical model using PIV and 3D scanning technologies, J. Hydraul. Res., 46(4), 489-503. Gruschwitz, E., 1935. Turbulent reibungsschichten mit seckundarstromung, IngenieurArchiv., 4, 355-365. Guo, Q.-C. and Jin, Y.-C., 2002. Modeling nonuniform suspended sediment transport in alluvial rivers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 128(9), 839-847. Guo, Q.-C. and Jin, Y.-C., 1999. Modeling sediment transport using depth-averaged and moment equations, J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(12), 1262-1269. Harris, C.K. and Wiberg, P.L., 2001. A two-dimensional, time-dependent model of suspended sediment transport and bed reworking for continental shelves, Comput. Geosci., 27, 675-690. Hayter, E.J. and Mehta, A.J., 1986. Modelling cohesive sediment transport in estuarial waters, Appl. Math. Model., 10(4), 294-303. Hibma, A., de Vriend, H.J. and Stive, M.J.F., 2003. Numerical modelling of shoal pattern formation in well-mixed elongated estuaries, Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 57, 981991. Hinze, O.J., 1959. Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New York. Holz, K.-P. and Crotogino A., 1985. A simple model for suspended material transport in depth-averaged channel flow, Euromech192: Transport of Suspended Solids in Open Channels, Munich, F.R.Germany, 197-200. Huang, J., Borthwick, A.G.L. and Soulsby, R.L., 2008. One-dimensional modelling of fluvial bed morphodynamics, J. Hydraul. Res., 46(5), 636-647. Hudson, J., Damgaard, J., Dodd, N., Chesher, T. and Cooper, A., 2005. Numerical approaches for 1D morphodynamic modelling. Coast. Eng., 52, 691–707. Ikeda, S. and Nishimura, T., 1986. Flow and bed profile in meandering sand-silt rivers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 112(7), 562-579. Jang, C.-L. and Shimizu, Y., 2007. Vegetation effects on the morphological behavior of alluvial channels, J. Hydraul. Res., 45(6), 763-772. 258 Jansen, P.P., 1979, Principles of River Engineering: The Non-tidal Alluvial River. Pitman, London. James, C.S., 1985. Sediment transfer to overbank sections, J. Hydraul. Res., 23(5), 435452. Jia, Y. and Wang, S.S.Y., 1999, Numerical model for channel flow and morphological change studies, J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(9), 924-933. Johnston, J.P., 1960, On the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer generated by secondary flow, J. Basic Engrg., Trans., ASME, Series D, 82, 233-248. Kaimal, J.C. and Finnigan, J.J., 1994. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows. Oxford University Press, New York. Karambas, T.V. and Karathanassi, E.K., 2004. Longshore sediment transport by nonlinear waves and currents, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng., 130(6), 277-286. Kassem, A.A. and Chaudhry, M.H., 2002. Numerical modeling of bed evolution in channel bens, J. Hydraul. Eng., 128(5), 507-514. Katopodes, N.D. and Wu, C.T., 1986. Explicit computation of discontinuous channel flow, J. Hydraul. Eng., 112(6), 456-475. Kerssens, P.M.J., Prins, A. and van Rijn, L.C., 1979. Model for suspended sediment transport, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 105(5), 461-476. Krone, R.B., 1962. Flume Studies of the Transport of Sediment in Estuarial Shoaling Processes. Final Report, Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif Kuethe, A.M., McKee, P.G. and Curry, W.H., 1949. Measurements in the Boundary Layer of a Yawed Wing. NACA TN 1946. Kuipers, J. and Vreugdenhil, C.B., 1973. Calculations of Two-Dimensional Horizontal Flows. Report S 163, Part I, Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, Delft, The Netherlands. Lanzoni, S., 2008. Mathematical modelling of bedload transport over partially dry areas, Acta Geophys., 56(3), 734-752. Lardner, R.W. and Song, Y., 1991. An algorithm for three-dimensional convectiondiffusion with very different horizontal and vertical scales. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 32, 1303-1319. Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., 1974. The numerical calculation of turbulent flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 3, 269-289. Lean, G.H. and Weare, T.J., 1979. Modeling two-dimensional circulating flow, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 105(1), 17-26. 259 Lee, J.-J., Skjelbreia, E. and Raichlen, F., 1982. Measurement of velocities in solitary waves, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng., 108(WW2), 200-218. Lemos, C.M., 1992. Wave Breaking: A Numerical Study. Lecture Notes in Engineering, 71, Springer-Verlag. Lesser, G.R., Roelvink, J.A., van Kester, J.A.T.M. and Stelling, G.S., 2004. Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model, Coast. Eng., 51(8-9), 883915. Lien, R.-C. and D’Asaro, E.A., 2006. Measurement of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate with a Lagrangian float, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 964-976. Lin, P., 1998. Numerical Modeling of Breaking Waves. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Lin, P. and Liu, P.L.F., 1998. A numerical study of breaking waves in the surf zone, J. Fluid Mech., 359, 239-264. Liu, M., Rajaratnam, N. and Zhu, D.Z., 2004. Turbulence structure of hydraulic jumps of low Froude numbers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(6), 511-520. Liu, P.L.-F. and Cho, Y.-S., 1995. Runup of solitary waves on a circular island, J. Fluid Mech., 302, 259-285. Liu, P.L.-F., Cho, Y.-S. and Fujima, K., 1994. Numerical solutions of three-dimensional run-up on a circular island, Int. Symp.: Waves – Physical and Numerical Modelling, Vancouver, Canada, 1031-1040. Liu, P.L.-F., Yeh, H., Lin, P., Chang, K.-T. and Cho, Y.-S., 1998. Generation and evolution of edge-wave packets, Phys. Fluids, 10(7), 1635-1657. Long, W., Kirby, J.T. and Shao, Z.Y., 2008. A numerical scheme for morphological bed level calculations, Coast. Eng., 55(2), 167-180. Loose, B., Nino, C.Y. and Escauriaza, M.C., 2005. Finite volume modeling of variable density shallow-water flow equations for a well-mixed estuary: application to the Rio Maipo estuary in central Chile, J. Hydraul. Res., 43(4), 339-350. McAnally, W.H., 1989. STUDH: A two-dimensional numerical model for sediment transport, Sediment Transport Modeling: Proc. Int. Symp., 659-664. McGuirk, J.J. and Rodi, W., 1978. A depth-averaged mathematical model for the near field of side discharges into open-channel flow, J. Fluid Mech., 86(4), 761-781. Mehta, A.J., Hayter, E.J., Parker, W.R., Krone, R.B., and Teeter, A.M., 1989. Cohesive sediment transport i: process description, J. Hydraul. Eng., 115(8), 1076-1093. 260 Meyer-Peter, E. and Müller, R., 1948. Formulas for bed-load transport, 2nd Congress of the Int. Association for Hydraulic Structures Research, Stockholm, Sweden, 39-64. Minh-Duc, B. and Rodi, W., 2008. Numerical simulation of contraction scour in an open laboratory channel, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(4), 367-377. Minh-Duc, B., Wenka, T. and Rodi, W., 2004. Numerical modeling of bed deformation in laboratory channels, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(9), 894-904. Molls, T. and Chaudhry, M.H., 1995. Depth-averaged open-channel flow model, J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(6), 453-465. Molls, T., Chaudhry, M.H. and Khan, K.W., 1995. Numerical simulation of twodimensional flow near a spur-dike, Adv. Water Res., 18(4), 227-236. Moss, W.D., Baker, S. and Bradbury, L.J.S., 1979. Measurements of mean velocity and reynolds stresses in some regions of recirculating flow, Turbulent Shear Flows I, Springer-Verlag, 198-207. Mosselman E., 2005. Basic equations for sediment transport in CFD for fluvial morphodynamics. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics (Eds. Bates, P.D., Lane, S.N. and Ferguson, R.I.), John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom. Nagakawa, H. and Tsujimoto, T., 1980. Sand bed instability due to bed-load motion, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 106(12), 2029-2051. Nagata, N., Hosoda, T., Nakato, T. and Muramoto, Y., 2005. Three-dimensional numerical model for flow and bed deformation around river hydraulic structures, J. Hydraul. Eng., 131(12), 1074-1087. Nicholson, J. and O’Connor, A., 1986. Cohesive sediment transport model, J. Hydraul. Eng., 112(7), 621-640. Noye, B.J. and Tan, H.H., 1988. A third-order semi-implicit finite difference method for solving the one-dimensional convection-diffusion equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 26, 1615-1629. Noye, B.J. and Tan, H.H., 1989. Finite difference methods for the two-dimensional advection diffusion equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 9, 75-98. O'Connor, B.A. and Nicholson, J., 1988. A three-dimensional model of suspended particulate sediment transport, Coast. Eng., 12(2), 157-174. Pan, C.-H., Lin, B.-Y. and Mao, X.-Z., 2007. Case study: Numerical modeling of the tidal bore on the Qiantang River, China, J. Hydraul. Eng., 133(2), 130-138. Panofsky, H.A. and Dutton, J.A., 1984. Atmospheric turbulence: Models and methods for engineering applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 261 Partheniades, E., 1965. Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 91(1), 105-139. Pedrozo-Acuna, A., Simmonds, D.J., Otta, A.K. and Chadwick, A.J., 2006. On the crossshore profile change of gravel beaches, Coast. Eng., 53(4), 335-347. Pizzuto, J.E., 1987. Sediment diffusion during overbank flows, Sedimentology, 34, 301317. Ponce, V.M. and Yabusaki, S.B., 1981. Modeling circulation in depth-averaged flow, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 107(11), 1501-1518. Pope, S.B., 2000. Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press. Puri, A.N. and Kuo, C.Y., 1985. Numerical modelling of subcritical open channel flow using the k   turbulence model and the penalty function finite element technique, Appl. Math. Model., 9(2), 82-88. Rastogi, A.K. and Rodi, W., 1978, Predictions of heat and mass transfer in open channels, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 104(3), 397-420. Rodi, W., 1984. Turbulence Models and Their Application in Hydraulics - A State of the Art Review, I.A.H.R., Delft, The Netherlands. Seal, R., Paola, C., Parker, G., Southard, J.B. and Wilcock, P.R., 1997. Experiments on downstream fining of gravel: I. Narrow-channel runs, J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(10), 874884. Sekine, M., and Parker, G., 1992. Bed-load transport on transverse slope. I, J. Hydraul. Eng., 118(4), 513-535. Sharma, S. and Kavvas, M.L., 2005. Modeling noncohesive suspended sediment transport in stream channels using an ensemble-averaged conservation equation, J. Hydraul. Eng., 131(5), 380-389. Shields, A., 1992. Application of similarity principles and turbulence research to bed-load movement, Mitteilunger der Preussischen Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau und Schiffbau, 26, 5-24. Siviglia, A., Nobile, G. and Colombini, M., 2008. Quasi-conservative formulation of the one-dimensional Saint-Venant-Exner model, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(10), 1521-1526. Smart, G.M., 1984. Sediment transport formula for steep channels, J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(3), 267-276. Soares-Frazao, S, Le Grelle, N., Spinewine, B. and Zech, Y., 2007. Dam-break induced morphological changes in a channel with uniform sediments: measurements by a lasersheet imaging technique, J. Hydraul. Res., 45(SI), 87-95. 262 Soloviev, A. and Lukas, R., 2003. Observations of wave-enhanced turbulence in the nearsurface layer of the ocean during TOGA COARE, Deep-Sea Res., 50A, 371-395. Soulis, J.V., 2002. A fully coupled numerical technique for 2D bed morphology calculations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 38, 71-98. Sreenivasan, K.R., 1995. On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant. Phys. Fluids, 7, 2778-2784. Stelling, G.S. and Duinmeijer, S.P.A., 2003. A staggered conservative scheme for every froude number in rapidly varied shallow water flows, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 43(12), 1329-1354. Stoker, J.J., 1957. Water Waves, Interscience Publications, Wiley, New York. Struiksma, N., 1985. Prediction of 2-D bed topography in rivers, J. Hydraul. Eng., 111(8), 1169-1182. Struiksma, N., Olesen, K.W., Flokstra, C. and De Vriend, H.J., 1985. Bed deformation in curved alluvial channels, J. Hydraul. Res., 23(1), 57-79. Sukhodolov, A., Engelhardt, C., Kruger, A. and Bungartz, H., 2004. Case study: Turbulent flow and sediment distributions in a groyne field, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(1), 1-9. Sumer, B.M. and Fredsoe, J., 2001. Scour around pile in combined waves and current, J. Hydraul. Eng., 127(5), 403-411. Task Committee on Preparation of Sedimentation Manual Committee on Sedimentation, 1965. Sediment transportation mechanics: nature of sedimentation problems, J. Hydr. Div. ASCE, 91(2), 251-266. Thacker, W.C., 1981, Some exact solutions to the nonlinear shallow-water wave equations, J. Fluid Mech., 107, 499-508. Tingsanchali, T. and Maheswaran, S., 1990. 2-D depth-averaged flow computation near groyne, J. Hydraul. Eng., 116(1), 71-86. Toro, B.F.M., Meijer, K. and van Rijn, L.C., 1989. Quasi-3D and fully-3d modelling of suspended sediment transport, Sediment Transport Modeling: Proc. Int. Symp., 45-51. Tseng, C.-M., Hsu, S.M. and Shieh, C.-L., 2006. Formation processes and configuration of channel-flow dominated alluvial deltas by numerical simulation, J. Hydraul. Eng., 132(8), 825-838. Tseng, M.-H. and Yen, C.-L., 2004. Evaluation of some flux-limited high-resolution schemes for dam-break problems with source terms, J. Hydraul. Res., 42(5), 506-515. van Rijn, L.C., 1980. Computation of siltation in dredged trench, Report No. 1267-V, Delft Hydraulic Laboratory, Delft, The Netherlands. 263 van Rijn, L.C., 1984a. Sediment transport, Part I: Bed load transport, J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(10), 1431-1456. van Rijn, L.C., 1984b. Sediment transport, Part II: Suspended load transport, J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(11), 1613-1641. van Rijn, L.C., 1984c. Sediment pick-up functions, J. Hydraul. Eng., 110(10), 1494-1502. van Rijn, L.C., 1985. Mathematical models for sediment concentration profiles in steady flow, Euromech192: Transport of Suspended Solids in Open Channels, Munich, F.R.Germany, 49-68. van Rijn, L.C., 1986. Mathematical modelling of suspended sediment in non-uniform flows, J. Hydraul. Eng., 112(6), 433-455. van Rijn, L.C., 1989a. The state of the art in sediment transport modelling, Sediment Transport Modeling: Proc. Int. Symp., 13-32. van Rijn, L.C., 1989b. Handbook Sediment Transport by Currents and Waves, Delft Hydraulics. Vasquez, J.A., Steffler, P.M. and Millar, R.G., 2008. Modeling bed changes in meandering rivers using triangular finite elements, J. Hydraul. Eng., 134(9), 13481352. Wang, J.S., Ni, H.G. and He, Y.S., 2000. Finite-difference TVD scheme for computation of dam-break problems, J. Hydraul. Eng., 126(4), 253-262. Waterways Experiment Station (WES), 1960. Floods resulting from suddenly breached dams. Miscellaneous Paper No.2-374, Rep. 1: Conditions of Minimum Resistance, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss Weber, L.J., Schumate, E.D. and Mawer, N., 2001. Experiments on flow at a 90deg openchannel junction, J. Hydraul. Eng., 127(5), 340-350. Wei, G. and Kirby, J.T., 1995. Time-dependent numerical code for extended Boussinesq equatins, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng., 121, 251-261. Whitham, G.B., 1974. Linear and Nonlinear Waves. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Wu, C., Huang, G. and Zheng, Y., 1999. Theoretical solution of dam-break shock wave, J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(11), 1210-1215. Wu, W., 2004. Depth-averaged two-dimensional numerical modeling of unsteady flow and nonuniform sediment transport in open channels, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(10), 10131024. Wu, W., Rodi, W. and Wenka, T., 2000. 3D numerical modeling of flow and sediment transport in open channels, J. Hydraul. Eng., 126(1), 4-15. 264 Wu, W. and Wang, S.S.Y., 2007. One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable beds, J. Hydraul. Eng., 133(1), 48-58. Yang, C.T., 1996. Sediment Transport: Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill. Ye, J. and McCorquodale, J.A., 1997. Depth-averaged hydrodynamic model in curvilinear collocated grid, J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(5), 380-388. Yen, C.L., 1970. Bed topography effect on flow in a meander, J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 96(1), 57-73. Ying, X., Khan, A.A. and Wang, S.S.Y., 2004. Upwind conservative scheme for the Saint Venant equations, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(10), 977-987. Younus, M. and Chaudhry, M.H., 1994. A depth-averaged k   turbulence model for the computation of free-surface flow, J. Hydraul. Res., 32(3), 415-436. Zech, Y., Soares-Frazao, S., Spinewine, B. and Le Grelle, N., 2008. Dam-break induced sediment movement: Experimental approaches and numerical modelling, J. Hydraul. Res., 46(2), 176-190. Zeng, Q.H., 1982. On the bed-load movement in the channel bend (in Chinese), J. Sediment Res., 3, 59-65. Zhang, H., Nakagawa, H., Muto, Y., Muramoto, D. and Touchi, D., 2007. Bed deformation around groins in a river restoration project, Annu. J. Hydraul. Eng., JSCE, 51, 127-132. Zhang, H., Nakagawa, H., Muto, Y., Muramoto, Y., Touchi, D. and Nanbu, Y., 2007. Morphodynamics of channels with groins and its application in river restoration, Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., 50B, 635-651. Zhang, Y., Swift, D.J.P., Fan, S., Niedoroda, A.W., and Reed, C.W., 1999. Twodimensional numerical modeling of storm deposition on the northern california shelf, Mar. Geol., 154, 155-167. Zhou, J. and Lin, B., 1998. One-dimensional mathematical model for suspended sediment by lateral integration, J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(7), 712-717. Zhou, J.F. and Li, J.C., 2005. Modeling storm-induced current circulation and sediment transport in a schematic harbor, J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng., 131(1), 25-32. Zhou, J.G., 1995. Velocity-depth coupling in shallow-water flows, J. Hydraul. Eng., 121(10), 717-724. Zhou, J.G., Causon, D.M., Mingham, C.G. and Ingram, D.M., 2004. Numerical prediction of dam-break flows in general geometries with complex bed topography, J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(4), 332-340. 265 Zhou, J.G. and Stansby, P.K, 1999. 2D shallow water flow model for the hydraulic jump, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 29(4), 375-387. 266 [...]... morphological evolution resulted from the bed load transport is investigated and the evolution of the bed profiles are recorded Using the present model, the numerical simulation is carried out and good predictions for the trend of the bed evolution are obtained Lastly, the hydrodynamic conditions and the morphological evolution in a channel consisting of a contraction and an expansion are studied numerically... 7 Due to the importance of the experimental study and efficiency of numerical simulation, researchers usually combine both of them to study the sediment transport and morphological evolution For example, when investigating the vegetation effects on the morphological behavior of alluvial channels, Jang and Shimizu (2007) carried out both laboratory experiments and numerical simulations Zhang et al (2007)... earth and the human being Therefore, it is very important to study the sediment transport phenomena and the resulting morphological change Due to the complexity of the sediment transport mechanism, both numerical modeling and experimental investigation are very important methods for studying the sediment transport Compared with the experimental study, numerical simulation is probably a very convenient and. .. Comparisons between numerical results and observed data showed good agreement Duan and Julien (2005) employed a depth-averaged two-dimensional numerical model to study the inception and development of channel meandering processes Both bed load and suspended load were calculated assuming equilibrium sediment transport and the bank erosion consisted of the basal erosion and the bank failure The numerical results... 7.5 and 15 hours between numerical results simulated with and without bed slope effect Solid line: initial bed profile; Circles and triangles: experimental measurements of bed elevation after 7.5 and 15 hours respectively; Dash-dot line and dashed line: numerical results of bed elevation after 7.5 and 15 hours from present model with bed slope effect; Line with plus and with cross: numerical results of. .. solid wall  angle of repose mean quantities xxv Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Background of Sediment Transport Study Sediment transport under hydrodynamic conditions plays an essential role in the morphological evolution of rivers, estuaries and coastal areas (Guo and Jin, 1999) From the long-term point of view, it determines, for example, the local scour or deposition in the vicinity of the river structures... …………………………….……… 130 Figure 4.26: Numerical simulation of Gaussian hump evolution up to 10,000 s …… 133 Figure 4.27: Comparisons of the bed elevation between the analytical solution (solid line) and the numerical result (circle) at t=600 s (left), 2000 s (middle) and 6000 s (right) .134 xiii Figure 4.28: Time history of the total volume of the sand bed; the total volume of the sand bed is normalized by its... 7.5 and 15 hours respectively; Dash-dot and dashed lines: present numerical results after 7.5 and 15 hours respectively; Lines with plus and with cross: van Rijn’s numerical results after 7.5 and 15 hours respectively; Dotted line: numerical result of water surface after 15 hours ……………………………………….……………………………… 156 Figure 5.12: Bed elevation comparisons after 7.5 and 15 hours between numerical results and. .. ………………………………………………………………………………… 160 Figure 5.15: Comparisons of bed elevations in Test 3 after 7.5 and 15 hours between numerical results simulated with and without bed slope effect Solid line: initial bed profile; Circles and triangles: experimental measurements of bed elevation after 7.5 and 15 hours respectively; Dash-dot line and dashed line: numerical results of bed elevation after 7.5 and 15 hours from present model with... and with cross: xv numerical results of bed elevation after 7.5 and 15 hours respectively from present model without bed slope effect; Dotted line: numerical result of water surface after 15 hours …………………………………………………………………………………161 Figure 5.16: Comparison of bed elevations after 7.5 and 15 hours in Test 3 predicted using different values of angle of repose Solid line: initial bed profile; Circles and . NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION LIN QUANHONG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2009 NUMERICAL SIMULATION. SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION LIN QUANHONG (B.Eng. and M.Eng., Tianjin University, China) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF. conditions, the morphological evolution resulted from the bed load transport is investigated and the evolution of the bed profiles are recorded. Using the present model, the numerical simulation

Ngày đăng: 14/09/2015, 08:41

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • A1 Cover page v1

    • NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION

    • NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION

    • A2 Acknowledgements v4

    • A3 Table of Contents v1

      • 1 Introduction 1

      • A4 Summary Backv3

      • A5 List of Tables v1

        • List of Tables

        • A6 List of Figures v1

          • List of Figures

          • A7 List of Symbols v2

            • List of Symbols

            • 1 v2

            • 2 v8 after Oral

              • Chapter 2

              • Mathematical Formulation of the Numerical Model

                • 2.1 Shallow-Water Equations

                • 2.2 Depth-Averaged Turbulence Closure

                • 2.4 Morphological Change Model

                • 2.5 Correction for Bed Shear Stress

                • 2.7 Initial and Boundary Conditions

                • 2.8 Summary of Governing Equations

                • 3 v9 after Oral

                  • Chapter 3

                  • Numerical Implementation

                    • 3.1.3 Depth-averaged equations

                    • 3.1.4 Suspended load transport equation

                    • 3.1.5 Morphological evolution equation

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan