An evaluation on the coursebook Lifelines Elementary for non-English major students at Laocai Teachers Training College Ngô Thị Thu Nga Trường Đại học Ngoại Ngữ Luận văn ThS. Chuyên ngành: English Linguistics; Mã số: 60 22 15 Người hướng dẫn: Ph.D. Đỗ Tuấn Minh Năm bảo vệ: 2010 Keywords: Tiếng Anh; Giáo trình; Sinh viên Content: PART I: Introduction 1.1. Rationale and aims of the study Course books have played an important role in most language programs. However, research has suggested that despite their important role, course books are not always professionally designed and do not always fit the curriculum and closely correspond with the objectives of the course and the needs of the students. Thus, course books should be carefully evaluated and selected before being used for a language program. On the other hand, course book evaluation does help the managerial and teaching staff select the most appropriate materials available for a particular course. It also helps to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a particular course book that is already in use. This is to inform teachers in the process of course book adaptation and decision- making for the next courses. At Laocai Teacher Training College (LTTC), English has been a compulsory subject since 1992. However, there has not been an official course book which is approved by the Ministry of Education since then. The teacher there themselves choose the course book that they believe appropriate to their students without a research. The New Cambridge English course I (Michael Swan &Catherine Walter, 1990) was chosen to be the course book for 14 years, from 1992 to 2006. Then the teachers there found it no longer suitable because of the out-of-date information and boring tasks in the book. Again, they themselves chose another course book titled Lifelines (Elementary) (Tom Hutchinson, Oxford University Press, 2002), which is being used at many other colleges in some Northern mountainous province in Vietnam. The Lifeline (Elementary) has been the main course book for all the non-English major students there since 2006. Though, it has never been evaluated. The author of this study is one of the teachers who have work with this course book for some years. She wishes to know to what extent the course book suits her students. So she decided to conduct an official research to evaluate it. This study seeks to evaluate the course book Lifelines (Elementary) (Tom Hutchinson, Oxford University Press, 2002) which is in use for the non-English major students at Laocai Teacher Training College. Specifically, it seeks to examine the suitability of the course book to those students. That is, it seeks to answer the question “To what extent does the Lifelines (Elementary) course book suit the non-English major students at Laocai Teacher Training College?” As this is only a small-sized scale study, a number of issues, though intriguing, would be beyond the scope of inquiry and would be best dealt with in a further study. 1.2. Significance of the study This study can be significant in some ways. As discussed earlier, course book is a key component in most language programs. In the teaching context at Laocai Teacher Training College, it may even constitute the main source of language input that learners receive and the basis for language practice that occur both inside and outside the classroom. In order to serve their purposes most effectively, course books need to be professionally designed, fit the curriculum and closely correspond with the aims of the teaching program and the needs of the students. However, after four years of being used, the Lifelines (Elementary) reveals several problems which bring teachers and students working with it considerable difficulty in meeting students’ needs and achieving the ultimate goal of their teaching and learning program as well. The current research helps to identify the problems and suggests some recommendations to improve them. This contribution would be of practical value to teachers and teacher trainers in other colleges in some Northern mountainous province in Vietnam whose students and teaching context are the same as the author’s. 1.3. Research questions This study aims to answer the question “To what extent does the course book Lifelines (Elementary) suit the non-English major students at Laocai Teacher Training College?” In order to answer the research question, the following specific research questions were raised: 1. Is Lifelines (Elementary) appropriate to the students’ level and the objectives of the course? 2. To what extent does the course book meet the students’ needs? 3. Is the course book suited to current teaching and learning methods? 1.4. Methods of the study The methods employed in this study included document analysis, student survey, questionnaire, informal interview, and class observation. For the purpose of course book analysis, an in-depth evaluation of the Lifelines (Elementary) was conducted using the model of Hutchinson & Waters (1993). The student survey (Appendix 1) enabled to collect students’ opinions about the practicality as well as the suitability of the course book. In designing the survey the author used more closed questions than open-ended ones in order to easily quantify the data. The survey was written in English and included five sections. The first section gathered general information of the informants but allowed for anonymity. The second section consisted of three questions asking the appropriateness of the course book to the objectives of the course. The third section includes eight questions asking about the suitability of the course book to the students’ needs. The last two sections which involve 14 questions were designed to find out the teaching and learning methods, learning conditions, and students’ comments and suggestions. The respondents of the survey were 275 non-major English students at the college. The data collection took place during June 2010 at the college. Besides, three telephone interviews with three good former students were conducted. The purpose of conducting the interview was to get more objective and exactly results. This information would help to explain the findings in a more objective manner. Each interview lasted approximately 30 minutes and the author used note-taking techniques to record the information. 1.5. Design of the study This study mainly consists of three main parts: Part I begins with a general introduction covering the reasons for choosing the theme, aims, research questions, research methods, and design of the study. Part II contains two chapters: Chapter I deals with the literature review in which the most important notions related to materials evaluation are discussed. Readers are provided with concise understandings of the approaches, types, and methods of evaluation. Chapter II is devoted to the analysis of the survey questionnaire of the course book evaluation carried out at LTTC, in which objectives, description, data collation, and analysis are demonstrated in details. On the basis of the findings in the previous parts, part III shows some recommendations and conclusion which encloses practical suggestions for the future use of this course book. An useful appendix can be found at the end of the thesis. REFERENCES 1. Brown, J.D (1995), The Element of Language Curriculum, Newbury House Teacher Development 2. Candlin, C.N. & Breen, M. (1987), ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development. ELT document. London, Modern English Publications. 3. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your course book. Oxford: Heinemann. 4. Dudlley-Evans, T. & Students.John, M.J. (1998), Development in English for Specific Purposes: A Multidisciplinary approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 5. Ellis, R. (1997), The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials, ELT Journal 6. Foddy, W. (1993), Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in social research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 7. Gabrielatos, C. (2001), Materials Evaluation and Adaptation: A case Study of Grammar Teaching. Retrieved in August 15, 2006 8. Hutchinson, T. and Torres, E. (1994), The textbook as Agent of Change, ELT Journal. Volume 48/4 9. Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987), English for specific purposes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 10. Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1993), English for specific purposes, Cambridge University Press 11. Johnson, R.K. (1989), The Second Language Curriculum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 12. Nguyen Thi Huong Lan (2004), An Evaluation of the Piloted "English 10" Textbook 2 at Nguyen Tat Thanh School, MA Thesis, CFL-VNU 13. Madsen, K.S. and Bowen, J.D. (1978), Adaptation in Language Teaching, Rowley, MA: Newbury House 14. McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (1993), Materials and Methods in ELT, Oxford. Blackwell Publishers 15. McDonough, J. & McDonough, S. (1997), Research Methods for English Language Teachers, London: Arnold 16. McGrath, I. (2002), Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. 17. Michael Swan & Catherine Walter (1990), The New Cambridge English course I, 18. Tran Thanh Nhan (2006), An Evaluation of the Textbook "oxford English for Electronics" and Suggestions for New Material Design, MA Thesis, CFL-VNU 19. Nunan, D. (1991), Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers, Prentice 20. Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (1986), Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press 21. Richards, J. (2001), Curriculum Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press 22. Richards, J. (2005), The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program, Retrieved from the www in Nov 2007 at http://www.professorjackrichards.com/work.htm. 23. Robinson, P.C. (1991), ESP Today: A Practitioner's Guide, Prentice Hall 24. Sheldon, L.E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal 42/4, Oxford University Press 25. Tomlinson, B (1998), Materials Development in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press 26. Tom Hutchinson (2002), Lifelines-(Elementary, Oxford University Press 27. Williams, D. (1983), Developing Criteria for textbook Evaluation, ELT Journal 37/3 . English and included five sections. The first section gathered general information of the informants but allowed for anonymity. The second section consisted of three questions asking the appropriateness. An evaluation on the coursebook Lifelines Elementary for non-English major students at Laocai Teachers Training College Ngô Thị Thu Nga Trường Đại. those students. That is, it seeks to answer the question “To what extent does the Lifelines (Elementary) course book suit the non-English major students at Laocai Teacher Training College? ”