A study on common mistakes made by Vietnamese beginners of English in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ and possible solutions

Being fully aware of the necessity of correcting mistakes for students as well as Vietnamese learners of English, the writer of this paper decided to conduct the study entitled “A study

A study on common mistakes made by

Vietnamese beginners of English in

pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ and possible

solutions

Lê Ngọc Hân

University of Languages and International Studies M.A Thesis: English Linguistics; Code: 60 22 15

Supervisor : Prof.Dr Võ Đại Quang Year of graduation: 2011

Abstract It is undeniable that English has become the most popular foreign

language in Vietnam nowadays Nevertheless, among millions of people speaking English in Vietnam, there are many people who make mistakes in pronunciation This paper is focused on the mistakes made by Vietnamese beginners of English when pronouncing the six English sounds θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ Causes for the mistakes and some tentative suggestions to mitigate the problem are then discussed The mistakes are identified in terms of both wrong manner of articulation and wrong place of articulation of the sounds It is argued that the mistakes can be explained in terms of inadequate knowledge of the articulation of the sounds and, more importantly, the interference of the mother tongue Suggestions for effective ways to overcome the difficulty include careful instructions in how to pronounce the sounds, comparative and contrastive analysis of the phonetic features of the sounds in

English and the equivalents in Vietnamese, and emphasis on drills and practice

Keywords Phát âm; Phụ âm; Tiếng Anh

Content

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

Chapter one “Introduction” includes the reasons of choosing the thesis, the aims, the objectives, the scope, research questions and the organization of the study

1.1 Rationale

English, the most popular foreign language in Vietnam, has been taught from the early age (at the age of 7 or even younger) in most of schools and universities throughout the country as a

compulsory subject however, not many of them “have intelligible English pronunciation so that they can be understood easily in direct communication with foreigners” It is the exact fact happening in Bac Ninh Specialized High School Over many years of teaching English in this school, the writer of the study has observed that there are quite a number of students who frequently make mistakes with English sounds Being fully aware of the necessity of correcting mistakes for students as well as Vietnamese learners of English, the writer of this paper decided to conduct the study entitled “A study on common mistakes made by Vietnamese beginners of English in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ and possible solutions”

1.2 Aims and objectives of the study

1.2.1 Aims

The research aims at:

- improving students‟ pronunciation of the six English consonants θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ

- providing English teachers with a reference for the pronunciation of θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ

1.2.2 Objectives

To achieve these aims, the following objectives are set forth as tasks of the study:

- identify Vietnamese learners‟ common mistakes in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ

- find out causes of mistakes made by Vietnamese learners in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ,

ʧ

- find out solutions to make teaching and learning process better so that mistakes in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ can be avoided

1.2.3 Research questions

The above-mentioned objectives can be elaborated into the following research questions: Question 1: What common mistakes do Vietnamese learners have in pronouncing the English sounds θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ?

Question 2: What are the causes of those mistakes?

Question 3: What are possible solutions to those mistakes?

1.3 Scope of the study

In thesis we only concentrate on common mistakes made by 30 students who are studying English as major field in Bac Ninh Specialized High School in pronouncing “θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ” and causes of those mistakes as well as possible solutions to eliminate them These collected mistakes are considered as the common ones made by Vietnamese learners

1.4 Organization of the study

To achieve the aims of the study, this paper is divided into five chapters

Chapter one : Introduction

Chapter two :Literature Review

Chapter three :Methodology

Chapter four : Findings and discussions

Chapter five :Conclusion

CHAPTER TWO : LITERATURE REVIEW

Chapter two “Literature Review” is devoted to the presentation of the theoretical background relevant to the research Firstly, the review of pronunciation as well as factors affecting pronunciation learning are introduced Then the literature related to mistakes is given It

includes the notion of mistakes in language learning, types of mistakes and the main causes

of mistakes Lastly, articulatory features of the six consonnants are mentioned

2.1 Theoretical Background

2.1.1 The role of pronounciation in language teaching

2.1.2 Factors affecting pronunciation learning

2.1.2.1 The native language

2.1.2.2 The age factor

2.1.2.3 Pronunciation ability

2.1.2.4 Motivation and concern for good pronunciation

2.1.3 Articulatory phonetics

2.1.4 Consonants

2.1.4.1 General description of English consonants

2.1.4.2 Articulatory features of θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ

2.1.4.2.1 Articulatory features of /θ, δ / and /ʃ, ʒ /

2.1.4.2.2 Articulatory features of /ʤ, ʧ/

2.1.5 Mistakes in language learning

2.1.5.1 Mistakes in language learning

2.1.5.2 Types of mistakes

2.1.5.3 Possible causes of mistakes in language learning

2.1.5.3.1 The interference of the mother tongue

2.1.5.3 2 Causes other than interference by first language

2.2 Previous works

As mentioned above, there have been a great deal of notable works about pronounciation issues and pronounciation teaching ones but some of them express the writers‟ concern about pronounciation problems especially the learners‟ difficulties in pronouncing English sounds However, it can be confirmed that Avery & Ehlrich (1992:67) are the two first people mentioning problems Vietnamese learners may face with when studying English “As the sound systems of English and Vietnamese differ greatly, Vietnamese speakers can have quite serve pronounciation problems”

Recently, an article named Common pronunciation problems of Vietnamese learners of English by Ha Cam Tam (2005:7) also pointed out some main problems in pronunciation of

Vietnamese learners, namely sound omission, sound confusion and sound redundancy However, many previous studies found in books, linguistic magazines or on the Internet are only about general pronunciation problems of wide issues, none of them specifies in certain consonants that most impede Vietnamese learners from communication and common mistakes in English pronunciation For this reason, the research is carried out to find out the common mistakes made by the students studying in Bac Ninh Specialized High School in pronouncing some English consonants and improve their pronunciation

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY

Chapter three “Methodology” describes in detail the research methodology which comprises the principles based on which the study is carried out It also presents techniques employed in this thesis, namely questionnaire, tape recording and interview

In order to fulfill the study, a combination of survey questionnaire, tape recording and interview is employed

3.1 Survey research

Among the research methods, survey research is one of the most important areas of measurement in applied social research The broad area of survey research encompasses any measurement procedures that involve asking questions of respondents A “survey” can be anything form a short paper-and- pencil feedback from to an intensive one-on-one in-depth interview

Survey research can be also defined in terms of the type of information gathered or the purposes for which the information is collected Alreck and Settle (1995:98) contended that the reasons for conducting survey include influencing a selected audience, modifying a service or product, and understanding or predicting human behaviour Rea and Paker (1997:88) added understanding people‟s interests and concerns as motivations for using surveys, with data reflecting descriptive, bahavioural or preferential characteristics of respondents

3.1.1 Steps for conducting a survey research

In this process of conducting a survey research, the researcher must make a series of careful decisions about how the study will be carried out These include a great deal of steps such as: determining the purpose of the study; stating the research questions; specifying the population and drawing a sample from the population; deciding on the methods of data collection; developing instruments, and training data collectors or interviewers ; collecting data ; analyzing the data; and addressing non response Understanding these steps will help researchers assess and construct their own meaning from reports of surveys that they read

3.1.1.1 Defining a population

After stating the research questions, it is advisable to define a population The population is the entire group of entities or people to which the results of a study are intended to apply The population can vary widely depending on the research questions and the purpose of the study

It can be a set of schools, a group of people such as students or teachers or a set of instances

of language uses

3.1.1.2 Sampling

Sample is a crucial factor in the survey research as it is not possible to survey the entire group

of interest (the population) but a subgroup (a sample) The selected sample must be similar to the population of interest in important ways if the results of the study are intended to apply to (be representative of) that population

3.1.1.3 Methods of collecting survey data

While conducting the research, the most prevalent data-collection methods are questionnaires, interviews and direct observations of language use In addition, many other types of information can be gathered including test results, compositions, or reactions to L2 oral or written language data

Questionnaire is the most common methods of data collection L2 survey research It can range from short items to long documents which require one or two hours to complete Items

in the questionnaire can be open-ended format (allowing respondents to reply in their own words) or closed one, requiring the respondent to select one from among a limited number of responses

3.1.1.4 Data analysis

Descriptive Analyses of the results of a survey are often reported in frequency and percentages These descriptive statistics are numbers that summarize the data

Correlational Analyses can be applied along with the descriptive to analyze relationships among variables

3.2 Techniques employed in this thesis

3.2.1 Data collection instruments

In order to complete this minor thesis, both quantitative and qualitative methods have been conducted to collect data They include: tape recording, questionnaire and interview

3.2.1.1 Tape recording

A task was designed to record the students‟ pronounciation including two main parts: In part one, students read aloud sounds and words which the sounds appear In part two, there is a short passage for students to read aloud, this passage has many words with the sounds students always mispronounce

3.2.1.2 Questionnaire

Questionnaire was used as the first tool to collect data for this study This kind of method has proved to be effective and time-saving since it could yeild a variety of data ranging from factual, behavorial to attitudinal from numerous respondents in different situations

In this research, a great number of question types categorized by Youngman (1986, as cited

in Nunan, 1992: 144) including frequency, list, category and ranking questions had been applied In that way, some serious limitations of questionnaires as cited in Dornyei (2003:10), which are simplicity and superficiality of answers, unreliable and unmotivated respondents, respondent literacy problems and fatigue effects, seemed to have been solved

a Aims of the questionnaire

The questionnaire is designed to clarify:

-Students‟ attitude toward pronunciation (question 4)

-Students‟ perception about their pronounciation mistakes (questions 5,6)

-Students‟ perception about causes of their mistakes in pronouncing some consonants.(question 7)

-Students‟ self-treatment to oversome those mistakes (question 9)

-Reflection on teachers‟ methods to help students eliminate their mistakes in pronouncing some English consonants (question 11)

b Selection of participations

Thirty students from English Department of Bac Ninh Specialized High School participated All of the students are studying English as major field and 100% of the students taking part in the study spent 7 years and more studying English

3.2.1.3 Interview

Interview is one kind of questionnaire, it is the vocal questionnaires and it has been used by second language acquisition researchers seeking data on stages and processes of acquisition (Johnson,1985: 44), and also by language testers, who use the oral interview as a mean of assessing proficiency (Ingram, 1984: 24)

3.2.2 Methods of data analysis

The approach offered by Strauss and Corbin (1998 :201) had been applied to analyze the collected data for the study.Thanks to this approach, the researcher, who is initially concerned

with describing exactly what they understood, can rebuild the data into a noticeable reality for those who have participated in this study Hence, the researcher‟s understanding of the factors affecting pronunciation learning and articulatory features of θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ was combined with the statistics, information provided by the students to result in certain interpretation The data were presented, thoroughly analyzed and discussed after the data had been collected and synthesized The interviews were used to provide more information as evidence to the findings in the data

3.3 Procedure

The first step of data collection is to record the students‟ pronunciation when reading aloud some English sounds and some words that the sounds appear and a short passage to find out whether the students make any mistakes with these sounds and how often the mistakes are After being piloted two times, the questionnaires were conducted on April 27th 2011 and collected on the same day They were not distributed to respondents to fill out on their own The participants were assisted in the process of completing the research questions, specially

by reading the questions in the definite order out load to the respondents, explaining each question clearly to avoid misunderstanding and noting down their answers

3.4 Summary

This study is carried out in the light of the action research so an overview of the action research is provided including the definition, processes of the action research Moreover, it presents techniques employed in this thesis, namely survey questionnaire, tape recording and interview as well as the aims of each technique and the procedure of collecting the data

CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

4 1 Findings from tape recording

There are two main types of errors found in the data Among common errors, omission of ending sounds was more frequent than others It is easy to understand why ending sound such

as /ʤ/ was so frequently (85 % of the students omitted this sound as ending sounds) because

Vietnamese learners do not have to pronounce the ending sounds In addition, the sound /ʤ/

is really hard for Vietnamese learners to pronounce especially when this sound occurs at the end of words Regarding the second type of errors, sound confusion, the most frequent errors are /θ/, /ʧ/, / ʃ / In brief, the data presented shows that when the subjects read the words or the sentences consisting of those consonants, all of the subjects seemed to fail to produce the sounds appropriately enough to make their speech comprehensible to native speakers

4.2 Findings and discussions from the questionnaire

4.2.1 Students’ attitude towards pronunciation

The importance of pronunciation is acknowledged by most of the questionnaire respondents, 57% of students thought it was very important It can be referred that only by mastering good pronunciation can the English learners speak English fluently and make others understand Meanwhile, 20 % of them considered pronunciation important in studying English About 13

% of the participants did not know whether it is important or not Only 10 % of the students considered pronunciation not very important in English studying This is due to the focus of lexical grammar in their studying

4.2.2 Students’ perceptions of their frequency of pronunciation mistakes

When being asked about their frequency of making mistakes in pronouncing English sounds, 43% of the participants thought that they often mispronounce English sounds 33% of them thought their frequency of mispronunciation was sometimes Only 10% of students reported that they always made mistakes in pronouncing English sounds Meanwhile, there were some

of them thought they seldom or never made mistakes with English sounds

4.2.3 Students’ perceptions of the causes of those mistakes

Finding out the causes of the students‟ mistakes with English sounds can be considered as a key to solve the problems so that is the reason why question number 7 is carefully designed

to find out the students‟ mistakes In this question, possible causes were listed and students were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with these causes

It can be seen in figure 5, about 45 % of the subjects agreed that they don‟t know how to use their tongue or mouth Meanwhile, 20 % of the students thought English sounds and Vietnamese ones are the same More than 47% of the participants agreed that they didn‟t practice much They didn‟t dare to ask teachers or friends for help Some of them were even afraid of their teachers‟ feedback

4.2.4 Students’ self-treatment to overcome those mistakes

Besides being asked about causes of mistakes, students were also questioned about their own ways to improve their pronunciation About 82% of them have ever tried some methods to improve their own pronunciation Here are some of the commonly applied methods of the students

4.2.5 Reflection on teachers’ methods used to help students to overcome those mistakes

Not all the students thought that their teachers did something to help them improve their pronunciation (90%)

From the figure above, it can be seen that minimal pair drills ranks as the most frequent methods (98%) as it can be easily applied in all skills not only in pronunciation lesson, and then follows reading aloud (95%)- an other common activity in all English classes Recording

is also one of the teachers‟ favorite options but it can be utilized in pronunciation course only with the support of the modern technology especially in the lavatory Listening and imitating

is also a very commonly used activity in any English lesson as it does not require a very great condition, only with a radio and a tape this can help students to practice more However, this can not always motivate students as the students would not have chances to check their own pronunciation and do not know whether they have made progresses or not Rarely did the teachers give the phonetic training to the students

4.3 Findings from the interviews

Students were asked which sound in the word “worth” they cannot pronounce correctly Ten

subjects answered that is the sound / θ / and explained why they mispronounced this sound

was because they did not know how to use their tongue and their teeth appropriately Besides, they tended to make it in the same way with the sound /th/ in Vietnamese

The same questions were raised with the sound /δ/ in the word “that/this”, /ʃ/ in “English”, / ʒ / in “television” All students confirmed that these are the sounds they found difficult to produce correctly When being asked about the causes of their mispronunciation of the sounds / θ, δ/, they said that they were not used to put the tongue outside the mouth between upper teeth and the lower teeth Moreover, blowing the air out was not an easy task for them

With the sounds / ʃ, ʒ, /, they said they often made it as the sound /s/ and /z/.They found it hard to raise the tongue up and make the mouth rounded at the same time On being asked about the mispronunciation with the sound /ʧ/, they thought they always made it more softly than it should be, like „ch‟ in Vietnamese For the sound /ʤ/, most of the students had no idea about the way to produce it exactly

4.4 Summary

This chapter can be considered as the most significant one of the study as it provides the necessary data and evidence for the writer to fulfill the task Firstly, students‟ mistakes with English sounds were found out through the recorded tape Next a questionnaire was given to find out their opinions about their mispronunciations of some sounds and their confirmation

of the causes and their methods and teachers‟ methods to improve their pronunciation Last but not least, interviews were conducted to cover the shortcomings left by the questionnaire

CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION

5.1 Recapitulation

This part of the study covers types of common mistakes made Vietnamese learners in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ, causes of these mistakes and some recommendations to mitigate the problems

5.2 Concluding remarks

Concluding remarks on Research Question 1: “What common mistakes do Vietnamese

learners have in pronouncing θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ?”

It can be confirmed that Vietnamese learners do make some common mistakes in pronouncing some English sounds such as θ, δ, ʃ, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ by looking at the data collected and the analyzed data especially at the findings of the recorded tapes Their common mistakes are sound omission and sound confusion

Concluding remarks on Research Question 2: “What are the main causes of those

mistakes?”

This research question of the thesis is concerned with the causes of these mistakes and the writer had two chances to understand clearly about these causes by looking at the findings of the questionnaire and the interviews Firstly, students were not fully aware of articulatory features of these sounds And in real communication, they failed to make natives understand Thirdly, there exists the negative interference of the mother tongue Last but not least, there were insufficient drill and practice among the students Some didn‟t dare to ask teachers or friends for help Others didn‟t pay enough attention to their pronunciation

Concluding remarks on Research Question 3: “What are possible solutions to those

mistakes?”

Through the study, the solutions can be drawn out In order to improve the pronunciation of the learners, both teachers and students have to try hard For the teacher, it is advisable that chances for students to explore, sentilize English and their own speaking or pronunciation should be provided.However, the students still need introducing and showing how to pronounce these sounds Last but not least, the learners should be informed of the similarities and differences between the English and Vietnamese For the students, self practice is an advice they should pay much attention to

5.3 Pedagogical Implications

Teaching a foreign language is considered as a hard job as there are a great deal of requirements the teachers have to live up to This is not an easy job for language teachers in Vietnam That is the reason why English pronunciation is paid more attention to and this can only be improved when learners‟ difficulties in English pronunciation is understood This thesis can be considered as a reference for any teachers for any teachers who concerns about the learner‟s pronunciation

5.3 Suggestions for further research

After conducting this study, I discovered some limitations remained Firstly, the scripts for recording did not have enough typical examples of words to use for analysis of the most frequent mistakes

Moreover, during the data analysis, I found that all the subjects made mistakes with not only the six consonants but also the clusters of vowels, the pitch, intonation and the aspects of connected speech However, due to the scope of the study, the other problems would be taken consideration in another study

Therefore, the author wishes to study more about Vietnamese learners‟ pronunciation mistakes in pronouncing other consonants as well as vowels on the same subjects with the hope of helping her students improve their English so that they can use it for further study

References

Books:

1 Avery, P & Susan, E (1912), Teaching American English Pronunciation, OUP

2 Baker, A & Goldstein, S (1990), Pronunciation Pairs – An Introduction course for Students of English, CUP

3 Bowen, T & Mark, J (1992), The Pronunciation Book, OUP

4 Brown, J.D & Rodgers, T.S (2002), Doing Second Language Research, OUP

5 Cam Tam, Ha (2005), Common pronunciation problems of Vietnamese learners of

English, Journal of Science, VNU, pp 5-11

6 Celce-Murcia, M (Editero) (1996), Teaching Pronunciation, CUP

7 Cruttenden , A (2001), Gimson’s Pronunciation of English, Arnold

8 Davenport M & Hannahs S.J (1998), Introducing Phonetics & Phonology, Arnold,

Great Britain

9 Duley, H.C, Burt, M.K and Krashen, S.D (1982) , Language Two, OUP

10 Ellis, R (1997) , Second Language Acquisition, OUP

11 French, F.G (1958), Common Errors in English, OUP

12 George, H.V (1972), Common Errors in Language Learning, Newbury House

13 Jacobovists , L.A (1969), A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Second Language Learning

and Bilingualism, Illinois

14 Jain, M.P (1974), Error Analysis: Cause and Significance, Longman

15 Laroy, A (1995), Pronunciation, OUP

16 Littlewood,W.T (1980), Foreign and Second Language Learning, Cambridge

Language Teaching Library

17 Hancok, M (2003), English Pronunciation in Use, CUP

18 Katamba, F (1996), An Introduction to Phonology, Longman

19 Kelly, G (2000), How to Teach Pronunciation, CUP

20 Kenworthy, J (1987), Teaching English Pronunciation, Longman

21 O‟Cornnor , J.D (1980), Better English Pronunciation, Longman

22 O‟Cornnor , J.D (1980),Sounds english- a Pronunciation Practice Book, Longman

23 Roach, P (2000), English Phonetics and Phonology, Cambridge U.P

24 Richarchs, Jack C (1992), Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics,

Longman

25 Skandera, P & Burleigh, P (2005), A manual of English Phonetics and Phonology,

pp 12-26

26 Thi Nu, Duong.(2009), Mistake or Vietnamese English, Journal of Science, VNU,

pp 2-8

27 Wallace, M.J.(1998), Action Research for Language Teachers, Cambridge University

Press

28 Wisker G (2001), The postgraduate Research Handbook, Palgrave

Websites :

29 International Phonetic Alphabet video Retrieved May 15, 2011 from

http://www.shef.ac.uk/ipa/symbols.php

30 The Internet TESL Journal’s TESL /TESOL /ESL/ESOL .Retrieved May 15, 2011

from link /http://iteslj.org/links/ESL/Pronunciation/Tongue_Twisters/

31 Pronouncing English sounds Retrieved May 15, 2011 from http://www.antimoon.com/how/pronunc-soundsipa.htm