1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo Dục - Đào Tạo

Business strategy of Thac Mo Hydro Power Plant Joint Stock Company stage 2010-2020, vision 2025

106 336 0
Tài liệu được quét OCR, nội dung có thể không chính xác

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 106
Dung lượng 59,5 MB

Nội dung

Trang 1

GRIGGS UNIVERSITY

GLOBAL ADVANCED MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM

CAPSTONE PROJECT REPORT

BUSINESS STRATEGY OF

THAC MO HYDRO POWER PLANT JOINT STOCK COMPANY

STAGE 2010 - 2020, VISION 2025

Nguyen Thanh Phu Nguyen Van Thu Tran Le Minh

Huynh Van Khanh

Class GaMBA01.D0109

Trang 2

Thac Mo hydro power plant

Without a strategy, an organization is like a ship without a rudder, going around in circles It’s like a tramp; it has no place to go

Trang 3

UNIVERSITY ane ¬ eC 9.œ Gg@o9 Capstone proJect report GaMBA01.DI09-Group N0.6 GUARANTEE STATEMENT

We, all members of Group NO.6 would like to guarantee that this Capstone project report of Master Program of Business Administration of GRIGGS University is the research project conducted by ourselves

Trang 4

Galccd) Capstone project report GaMBA01.DI09-Group N0.6

UNIVERSITY

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

During one year and a half studied and fulfilled our graduation capstone project report of Master Program of Business Administration of GRIGGS University, we would like to give sincere thanks to MBA Program of GRIGGS University, Viet Nam national University, Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh Electricity College for providing us the most advantageous condition for our studying We owe a debt of gratitude to our professors, whose enthusiastic teaching and valuable knowledge encouraged and motivated us all the time of study We also owe a special debt to our supervisors, who helped us a lot in fulfilling this capstone project report

In addition, we would like to give thanks to our tutors for supporting us enthusiastically, leaders of Thac Mo for valuable data and information

Finally, we would like to give special thanks to our employer and families for giving us time, financial aids and energy to accomplish the course

Please receive the deepest and the most sincere thanks from us

Authors

Trang 5

UNIVERSITY

Capstone prorect report GaMBAOI!.D109-Group N0.6

Griccs) „m port _ TOU TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUC TIƠN Q22 022221111125221 111522111111 221 11 1151111111111 11 1E x kh grky 12 I — Problem staftemen( 22 22211222122 211221 112111111211 xe 12 PIN oi) nh e 13 3 SCOD€ OÍr€S€ATCHh 022002201 1211122 1101112 1121112011111 1kg 13 4 — Research method 1 2222122111211 221 115112 11121122151 821 1281181 re 14 5 Academic and practical significanes “ca ẽ so 14

CHAPTER I:_ THEORETICAL BASIC 555522cccccccccsreree l6

1 Basic definition of business sfraf€gy - S2 1 2211121122211 trg 16 2 Classification of business sfraf€gy 2c S212 2221112211132 re 17

:LIINNG 6 ybooemit nec 17

Huệ 0U UV VÌ HỘI sang seasebirotiibndbsuerdisslisddtesieslatlorkikavseisstbieslirsstokiik4suspilitExiAið 17 BA | UNEDWVWMHED WI seisee.sesnsiandodeesesasLnodioisasdibltsuecaaplEsusoslisegsosdiniteek l7 Bade, NI recesses ott nlnernind iin helenae rn tubes lines ess 18 Disses ` FUNÔLHDI| BUHNIUIEE eiensuisiokiieieniiiiioebrokesinesskrekskeesbatie 19 3 ẨWfWfØÏ1GIMNGBBBEBHIEHÍ WfGĐGSH s ŸŸ 2 ŸSBẰ-ŸiỶỶYii =eee 19 Đ.i.( :, VMhkiqiplltiele(GUEHNHE u eaaaiiioiiianraindnndieieianaiiuy-e 20 3.1.2 ExXlerndlenviioimeitevilusfoH, 21 3.1.3 — Internal environment evaluafion ¿+ + +2 2z 2+ £zverrrzrerree ae 3.2, Husinessstrafesv fofmmiailion 23 3.3 _ Business strategy Implemenfation -5- +52 +Scs‡cxvsvcsxeses 24 đất — TPUSÌHSS SHHE6DV HRSEBSHNGHỦ ei cecnineoieeenooanndideandddeoaiea 24 3.5 _ Tools and experlences to select business strategy - 24 3.5.1 _ External factors evaluaflon mafrIX .: ccc c2 svsreerxes 24 3.5.2 _ Intemail factor evaluation matfrIX - i5 St sneierrrsrrrxee 26 3.5.3 _ Competitive profile matrix (CPM) 0 S1 22x22 2srrrsrrrrrses 27

NA - TNG:! TH cette iptables rth bc a dt 27

Trang 6

GR o3) Capstone project report St C | GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6 |

UNIVERSITY

3.5.5, Strategic position and action evaluation matrix- SPACE 28 3.5.6 Internal-Extermal matrix 0 00 00cc ccc ccceecceecceeeceeeeseecsesteeeseensetees 30 3.5.7 Grand Strategy Matrix cece cece ceecessceeeeeeseeeeeecseeeeeeeeeseees at 3.5.8 | Quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPMI 32 3.5.9 Experiences to choose busines strafegy 2222222 sse 34 CHAPTER Il: ANINTRODUCTION TO VIETNAM ELECTRICITY:

STATUS QUO AND DEVELOPMENT 35 N11 NsllaaaaẳaẳaẳaiiiiiẳiäáäẳắẳiẳiẳỎ.ẳđđá 35 I.I _ Vietnam power generating StruCfUTe ¿+ 2222 2223122211 E225c2zxxxs2 36 1.2 Electricity production ofFEVN from 01/2010 to 09/2010 38 I.3 — E]eCtTICIfV DFIC€ 2 2.0222 2111222112 2 1112k 38 131 —— ElsctrleiiyftleeinMtÌHH e« 38 1.3.2 _ Electricity price in developing counfrI€s -. 5 55555 2-<c+<ss2 39 2 Future development of electricify sources to 2020 55525 5<ss+52 4I

Trang 7

UNIVERSITY

Griccs) Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6

1.2.4 Business flelds ẰẶ22 S222 Ằ 52 1.3 Business situation of Thac Mo hydro power JSC - 54

13.1 Product OUPtut oo o.oo Ă 54

THÁC MO JSC STRATEGY FORMULATION TO 2020 57 2.1 Business missions and obJeCfIV€S - c1 2212221222212 22212 eres aT

2.1.1 MISSIONS! 57

"` 7N: - 57

2.2 _ External and internal environment analySIs 25 222cc S52 58 2.2.1 External environment anaÌySIS - 5-2 2c 2211211521121 set 58

Ded (0i ;I85i020/0101/12 00175 aAa 67

Trang 8

Capstone project report GaMBAO1!.D109-Group NO0.6

2.5.4 Operations managemein c c2 c2 nhanh 92 2.5.5 Corporate CuÏ{UT© ò 2222222222122 1n ynyyn 93 2.0 Strategic communIicafion SVySfem c cc c2 12 22k sesssee 95 aad RiSk TIE(HEGITEHE ác So gen enieeiiadvinnaunesusnsiiueaneanse 96 2.6 CONCLUSION 2 000 re erse 96 PE A sss stats otcsmiithnsiihtgtaiily nein int tnmnblt 98 Fa Leet x scans eh se esa Ses A Roh PR NL Oe a a 107

FIGURE INDEX:

Trang 9

GRIGG UNIVERSITY Capstone project report GaMBA01.D109-Group N0.6

TABLE INDEX

Table II-I: External factor evaluation mafrIX c2 c1 2212113222222 2sx+2 25 Table [-2: Internal factor evaluation mmafTIX c2 2 1112252222222 crsxee 26 Table H-3: Competitive Profile mafrIx - - 22222232221 121 11 2521522555255 12x55 27

l l!' S 3s ; ma 28

Table I-Š: QSPM mafrIX Ỏ 2 2522221111211 111211 111111120111 201 1110211122111 1 E2 1112 11 ng 33 Table III-1: Electricity consumption 1990-2009 ooo - Q2 2111211112511 1511 12x 35 Table HHI-2: average electricity sale price in 2007-2009 - 2222221222 c2 czzxs2 38 Table HI-3: Electricity price at poWer pÏanfs - - 52c S1 12112112212 rreerrrei 39 Table III-4: Electricity demand growth and maximum capacity of three regions 09281992) 0/09//Ý/A 54s: 0v.) nn` -.-®^"”.- 42 Table IH-ŠS: Electricity sources development program period 2010-2020 43 Table III-6: Pure coal mining quantity: basic case (PAI) -: 52c 2x <2 45 Table IV=1: Brusatess TIGNIS ss.cscscosnxccwaantnacaswnssncnsiuassensasnienasadsesstansasunedsebamineansenadansas 55 Table TY-2: Elecwietty production 1995-2008 cic nnncnecnnnnenenvnnsnansinaraedinndtiimenansndinbe 54 18016 1V HUSIH@WS TGIHIHNINEE csc ncn cenenirro seneawranechdininvetesderorcsduwenveriehworeseivnksterit 55 Table IV-4: Annual goods and services value .00 00ccccceeeccseeeseeccsssetesseeessees 56 TT EG I tc acces sic wl nce tne pln elidel eden bn n7 1ãBI€ TY -G:HleCtiieitV DIOdUGEOHEoeiaaaeseenaesiuasnroaiielnaderddsrsasbblsssbkisdzlzasgsssaSsi 68 Table TY-7- HusiHess perfotrtanog 2006 TUÌỔ .Ÿ ki iii-Ỷsee 69 Table IV-8: Disposable cash flow 2008-2010 - 2 22222222212 2tsrerrrerrei 70 The LÝ-2 Exiorripnl facbor evaliinitoi THỦ vua he kuniiindieioieoddaoioakassaosssrel 72 Hi LÍ": C/00 )00 TP NGẽẽ 6U 73 Table IV-I 1: Competitive Profile Matrix for Thac Mo JSC 75 Tabl[e TV-12: riermal actor matrix fur Thao Mo TSC co -niieo 76 Table IV-13 : Matrix SWOT -1 for Thác Mo JŠC LH eeieeekẰ 77 Table IV-14 : Matrix SWOT-2 for Thac Mo JSC ccecceceeccecceeeeeeceeeeeeeeeeneeees 78 Table IV-15 : Matrix SPAC3- Score table for Thac Mo JSC - 79 Table IV-16: Grand strategy matrix for Thac Mo JSC -.¿ 55-2222 x22ccxrrss 82

Trang 10

Griccs) Capstone project report GaMBAO1.D109-Group N0.6

Trang 11

Griccs) Capstone project report GaMBAO1!.D109-Group N0.6 INTRODUCTION 1 PROBLEM STATEMENT

Electricity is an essential energy which has highly specific character It holds a very important role in all aspects of economic, political, cultural and social conditions of a country As a secondary energy, power factors are the inputs for most business activities of enterprises, as well as the driving force for industrialization and modernization

From the very first days, a huge investment and national energetic security in most countries have made the production and trading of power a natural monopoly

Vietnam’s power sector from production, transmission and distribution, with no

exception, are within the control of the country for a long time

In the early stages of development, the Electricity Corporation of Vietnam (EVN) has successfully completed its mission as a representative of monopoly in power sector From the small grid and power scattered in different locals, Vietnam power system is connected into the unified national grid through the construction of 500kV

transmission lines, which are associated with the power scales like Tri An, Yaly,

Pha Lai, Hoa Binh, Phu My However, with continuously high growth of Vietnam’s economy and the annual electricity demand growth of 15-20% per year, it is essential to build more large power plant s with total capacity of over 2000MW per year with suitable synchronous transmission systems Despite of the assistance of national petroleum corporation of Vietnam (EVN) and Securities Group of Vietnam Coal (TKV), EVN could not ensure electricity supply for the economy Vietnam The electricity prices, which are controlled by the Government to keep out of inflation, have not stimulated investment in electricity generation process Under these circumstances, Vietnam government has decided to restructure the electricity industry and market-oriented electricity sector with the schedule of three levels To sustain and develop in this competitive environment, the power companies need to determine their business strategy in the coming years

Trang 12

Griccd) Capstone project report GaMBAO1!.D109-Group NO.6

Thac Mo hydro power joint stock company was established on the basis of stocking

Thac Mo Hydro power Company, with a Vietnamese trade name: CONG TY CO

PHAN THUY DIEN THAC MG The company officially works with ancient forms

from 01/01/2008, for stakes of EVN To survive and develop in the present trend,

this joint stock company needs to build appropriate business strategy based on its advantages

From the demands of the allegation, we have chosen "Thac Mo Hydro power Joint- stock Company: Business strategies to 2020" as our topic for graduate assignment

2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Research objectives are

- Assess Vietnam’s macro-economic development, government policy on electricity generation business as well as power competitive environment in Vietnam and other competitors to identify opportunities and connections threatening

- Make a general assessment on business activities of Thac Mo Hydropower JS Company and resources from the within to help us identify its strengths and weaknesses

- Propose suitable business strategies for Thac Mo hydropower JS Company based on internal strengths/weakness and external opportunities/threats, and also construct different solutions to support the implementation of effective business strategies outlined

3 SCOPE OF RESEARCH

Trang 13

Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6

Griccs) UNIVERSITY | |

4 RESEARCH METHOD

Focus on researching and analyzing information, primary and secondary data as shown below:

- Secondary information was collected at Thac Mo hydropower JSC and some other competitoes Besides, the data also collected through the mass media, the

Bureau of Statistics, the Ministry of Industry, survey information from Thac

Mo hydropower JSC

- Primary information: The construction of matrix strategic choices was made by expert methods to identify the environmental factors inside and outside, which affected business activities of enterprises, and to determine the importance of these factors

While this method is simple to make, its disadvantage is that stem from the

subjective assessment should be limited to the level of precision However, the

opinions from leading, practical experience experts that I invited to comment in this capstone project report is more than enough to build a good business strategy

5 ACADEMIC AND PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANES

Academic significance:

In market economies, business strategy is crucial to the success or failure of one’s business To survive and sustainably develop, one enterprise needs a good business strategy and performance

There are many approaches to build a business strategy for any business This is a significant academic theory that has been synthesized from various sources to build a business strategy in a most basic, easy to understand and to use

Practical significance:

Thac Mo Hydro power Joint Stock Company is now operating under JSC model This topic will analyze strengths and weaknesses of this company to identify the core competencies which could create competitive advantage for companies, as well

Trang 14

Griccd) Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6

as indentify opportunities and challenges in current and future leaders to help companies develop a strategic direction

This topic would provide Thac Mo hydropower JSC a reference source in quantifying the influence of these factors that has and will have an impact on the

Trang 15

¬ Capstone project report GaMBA01.D109-Group N0.6 Griccs) 7 =“y | " CHAPTER |: THEORETICAL BASIC

1 BASIC DEFINITION OF BUSINESS STRATEGY

The concept “strategy” appeared very early from researches on historical wars The earliest definition of strategy was belonging to Greek Historian Xenophon in sixth century BC In this time, Sun Tzu, a Chinese military theorist also wrote “The Art of War” which analyzed military strategies

Till the middle of twentieth century, researches and development of business strategy did actually start to occur From scholars such as Drucker, Chandler, Ansoff, Andrew studied the successes of American economic corporations before

and within World War II, to nowadays managers, economists such as Michael E Porter, Fred R David, Rudolf Grunig, Richard Kuhn there have been many

different approaches to business strategy These are some of them:

“The determination of the basic long-term goals and objectives of an enterprise and the adoption of the course of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals”.- Chandler (1962)

- Strategy is a mediating force between the orginization and_ its environment: consistent patterns of streams of organizational decisions to deal with the environment (Mintzberg, 1979)

- Strategy is a framework or plan to integrate main objectives, policies and sequences of actions into a strong and robust combination - Quinn (1980) - Strategy is about being different It means deliberately choosing a

different set of activities to deliver a unique mix of value - Michael E

Porter(1996)

- Strategies are the means by which long-term objectives will be achieved - Fred R David (2003)

- Strategy is long-term, direction of management and assurance of fulfillment of basic objectives and purposes of company - Rudolf Grunig va Richard Kuhn (2003)

Trang 16

Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0O.6

Griccs) UNIVERSITY ee cần

Although there have been many different approaches and definitions, a business strategy consists of the following contents:

- Identifying basic long-term objectives of company - Establishing general action programs

- Choosing courses of action, deploying and allocating resources to achieve those objectives

2 CLASSIFICATION OF BUSINESS STRATEGY

There are many different types of strategies within a company, depends on level, approaches business strategy can be divided by two categories:

2.1 STRATEGY LEVEL

According to level, a company has at least three levels of strategy:

- Corporate strategies: Strategies towards general purposes and extent of the organization

- Business level: Relating to sucessful competitive methods on specific markets

- Functional strategies: Strategies which help corporate and business strategies implemented effectively by components built on resources, human process and necessary skills

In a highly competitive and globalized environment, borders between nations were almost abolished; as a result there was a fourth level of strategy called global strategy

2.2 STRATEGY TYPES

2.2.1 CORPORATE LEVEL

Corporate strategies are often towards basic long-term objectives, consequently there are many types of corporate strategies According to Fred R David, there are

Trang 17

( IRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAOl [)109-Croup N0.6 3 UNIVERSITY - Forward integration - Backward integration - Horizontal integration Intensive strategies - Market Penetration - Market Development - Product Development - Related Diversilication - Unrelated Diversilication - Conglomerate Diversilication Other strategies - Joint Venture - Retrenchment - Divestiture - Liquidation Mixed strategies 2.2.2 BUSINESS LEVEL

Business strategies are related to successful competitive methods on specific markets Business strategies include competitive methods chosen by organizations, ways to position itself on the market to gain competitive advantages and different positioning strategies can be used in industrial circumstances

Trang 18

Griccs) Capstone project report GaMBAO1!.D109-Group N0.6

UNIVERSITY

2.2.3 FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES

Functional strategies are strategies of functional units such as marketing, finance,

human resource, etc These strategies help to enhance operational efficiency of company and support to business and corporate strategies implemented effectively

3 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS

Strategic management process consists of three stages: - Strategy formulation stage

- Strategy implementation stage - Strategy evaluation stage

Figure I-1: Comprehensive strategic management model + Develop Vision Mission and statement | Strategy planning Implementation _, Evaluation | mĩ T T

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David Figure I-1 illustrates a comprehensive strategic management model created by Fred R David In which strategy formulation stage includes: Identifying vision, mission,

Trang 19

Grigcd) Capstone project report GaMBAQO!.D109-Group N0.6

strategic objectives; analyzing external factors to identify opportunities and threats; analyzing internal factors to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of company; basing on these previous information, company identify business objectives and establishes long-term objectives and chooses strategies to implement Strategy implementation stage consists in allocating resources to set up annual objectives and policies The final stage is strategy measurement and evaluation

Strategy formulation process

According to Fred R David, strategy formulation process consists of three stages:

Figure [-2: Strategy formulation process ae Phase 1: Input

External factor Competitive profile matrix Internal factor

evaluation matrix (CPM) evaluation matrix (IFE)

(EFE)

Phase 2: Combination

Strengths, Strategic Boston Internal- Grand

weaknesses, position and consulting external Strategy opportunities and = action evaluation group matrix matrix(IE) matrix

threats matrix matrix (SPACE) (BCG) (SWOT) Phase 3: Decision Quantitative Strategic planning matrix (QSPM)

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David 3.1.1 VISION AND BASIC OBJECTIVES

This is the first stage of strategic management process, mission and basic objectives of company provide a cirumstance to build up strategies A mission presents reasons for the existence of company and points out what will company do Each company has a specific mission

Trang 20

ms Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group NO.6

Griccs) UNIVERSITY | | | RUN

Basic objectives of company identify what company expect to meet in medium and long term; target which company will develop to They are the first and the most important foundation to formulate business strategy Mission of company is a general concept, objectives break it down into details

Objectives are built on the foundation of mission; external and internal factors of company Objectives must be appropriate to objective and subjective conditions

3.1.2 EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION

Purposes of external environment evaluation are to develop a limited list of opportunities that will benefit to company and threats that company should avoid to mitigate negative impacts from external environment There are many different external evironmental factors (macro and micro), external environment evaluation just covers factors that have impacts on company

Macro environment include: - Economic environment,

- Political and legal environment, - Social and cultural environment,

- Demographic and geographical environment, - Technological environment,

- Global environment

Micro environment is competitive environment or the so-called industrial environment, is the environment affect directly to company, most of operational and competitive activities of company take place in this exvironment

Michael E Porter, Professor of business strategy, Harvard University created Five-

Trang 21

GRIGG Capstone project report €GaMBA01.DTI09-Group N0.6 UNIVERSITY Figure I-3: Porter’s Five-Forces model Threat of New Entrants : HN

Bargaining Among | Bargaining

Power of Existing Power of

Suppliers Competitors Buyers + Threat of Substitute Products or Services

Source: Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy- Michael E Porter

3.1.3 INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION

In each company, there are always different strongs and weaknesses at business units Internal strongs and weaknesses in associate with external opportunities and threats, and companion with mission statement are foundations to formulate objectives and strategies of company

Internal environmental factors: Finance:

Financial capability, management, accounting,

Management:

Including all managerial activities in order to ensure operational performances in reality are corresponding to expectations such as: Ability of human resources management; production management, quality management; materials management, financial, and sale management

Trang 22

( IRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAO1.D109-Group N0.6

hen

Marketing:

Marketing is described as a process of identification, forecast, establish and satisfy consumer’s demand to goods and services Marketing management include: Market development research; target market selection; distributional channels system; after-

sale services,

Personnel:

Human resources play a critical role to corporate performance Despite a right strategy, it can’t bring anything to company without effective workers Human resources include: human resoureces organizational structure, human resoureces quality, maintain and development policies

Operations management:

Include all the activities in order to bring inputs to goods and services of company Operations management process consists of: Production procedure design,

technological production line selection, production scale, production position, area;

product quality, services, manufactured price

3.2 BUSINESS STRATEGY FORMULATION

Basing on corporate objectives; external environmental factors and _ internal circumstance, to formulate business strategy with the following components:

- Identifying and selecting opportunities which could help company obtain business objectives

- Selecting target markets

- Selecting goods and services for target markets

- Building and analyzing strategy matrix to choose appropriate strategies - Building up marketing-mix strategy for selected goods and services

Trang 23

Capstone project report GaMBAO|] 1D109-Group NO.6

Griccs) UNIVERSITY | | |

3.3 BUSINESS STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

In order to implement effectively formulated business strategies, company must have solutions to operations management, business management; human resources, finance to carry out these strategies That is, organizing and allocating corporate resources to implement sucessfully selected business strategies, 1.e.:

- Organizing an appropriate organizational structure

- Allocating properly, maintaining and develop human resources - Allocating financial resources

- Building up operations management model scientifically and effectively - Bulding corporate culture matching with selected strategies

- Building strategic communication system, PR etc

3.4 BUSINESS STRATEGY ASSESSMENT

Evaluating whether a business strategy effective or not is very important A business strategy is effective when that strategy fits to real circumstances of company and socio-economic status around it; and utilize as much as possible opportunities to obtain proposed objectives Business strategy evaluation include the following steps:

- Examining and testing effecitiveness and fitness of business strategies before put in operation

- Evaluating operational and business performance of company period by period of strategy inplementation process in order to detect mistakes, disadvantages of strategy and creating timely regulations, repairments and supplements

3.5 TOOLS AND EXPERIENCES TO SELECT BUSINESS

STRATEGY

3.5.1 EXTERNAL FACTORS EVALUATION MATRIX

Estabishing a Matrix assesing External factors will help us to summarise and quantify influences of external environment factors on businesses, it affects

Trang 24

UNIVERSITY

= Capstone project report GaMBAO01.D109-Group N0.6

Griccs) P |

manufacturing and business operation of businesses; including many factors such as opportunities and challenges

To build a Matrix we manage to set a list containing all of the external factors affecting operation of a business Assesing the importance level of each factor by scoring weights; sum of scoring weights of all factors equals | Classification reveals the corresponding importance of those factors in business success

Assesing the importance level of each factor by classifying factors from | to 4; namely: level 4 means the company has the best reaction; level 3 is above average; 2 is average and | is the least Those levels depend on the effects of business strategy

The next step is determining weighted score of each factor by multiplying the the weight of factor with the corresponding rating Then, add sum of weighted scores with each variable to determine the total weighted score for a business; the highest is 4 and the least is 1 and average is 2,5 point

The total weighted score is 4 revealling that the company is taking advantage of external opportunities and controlling very well or minimizing external threats to the company

The total weighted score is | revealling that the company doesn’t seize the opportunities and minimize external threats

Trang 25

( IRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAQO1!.D109-Group N0.6

3

UNIVERSITY

——— een RA seb Asa 6 SSR ry oR ae ELT REE re Es SERRE —

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David

3.5.2 INTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION MATRIX

Building internal factor Matrix will help us to summarize and asses the important strengths and weaknesses of function business department, it affects manufacturing and business operation of businesses

To build a Matrix we manage to set a list including all of the external factors affecting operation of a business as mentioned in internal business assesment part Assesing the importance level of each factor by scoring weights; sum of scoring weights of all factors equals 1 Classification reveals the corresponding importance of those factors in business success

Assesing the importance level of each factor by classifying factors from 1 to 4; namely: level 4 means the company has the best reaction; level 3 is above average; 2 is average and | is the least Those levels depend on the effects of business strategy

The next step is determining weighted score for each factor by multiplying the weight of factor with the corresponding rating Then, add sum of weighted scores with each variable to determine the total weighted score for a business; the highest is 4 and the least is 1 and average is 2,5 point

The total weighted score is 4 revealling that the company is having strengths; and can overcome weaknesses On the contrary, the total weighted score is | revealling that the company doesn’t have strengths and has too many weakness to overcome

Trang 26

( apstone project report GaMBAQO!.D109-Group N0.6

Gariccs) UNIVERSITY | |

Total >w=l a rv

it r —— 2 C0 CÀ c Q CỘNG

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David

3.5.3 COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX (CPM)

Building competitive matrix help companies to identify rivals, pros and cons which help companies to have appropriate business strategy

This matrix including all of the internal and external factors of businesses plays an important role in the business success In the competitive image matrix, the competitors are also considered and calculate the weighted scores After that, we compare the total weighted scores of those companies with the prototype competitors Thereby, we will have a lot of information to build business strategy Table I-3: Competitive Profile matrix

Weight Sample company Competitor 1 Competitor Rating Weighted Rating Weighted Rating Weighted

Scores Scores Scores R S=W*R R S=W*R R S=W*R Factor | Ww, R, » a - a " Factor n Ww Ro Si x S lũ R Ẫ Tôn M, o iY 2M oy a, a Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David 3.5.4 SWOT MATRIX

Trang 27

( IRIGGS Capstone project report GaMBAO0I 1)109-Group NO.6

de

Table [-4: SWOT matrix

OPPORTUNITY (O) THEAT (T) j | | Strategy ST Xin Strategy SỐ” STRONG (S) Promote internal strengths to Promote internal strengths

take Opportunities advantage of to avoid external Threats |

[oo eee no SraegyWI =4

| WEAK (W) Overcome internal Weaknesses Overcome internal | to take advantage of Weaknesses to avoid

| Opportunities external Threats

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David SWOT matrix will help to establish 4 kinds of strategies

- Strength _ Opportunity Strategies (S_O) : Promote internal Strengths to take advantage of Opportunities

- Weakness Opportunity Strategies (W_O): Overcome internal Weaknesses to take advantage of Opportunities

- Strength Threat Strategies (S_T): Promote internal Strengths to avoid external Threats - Weakness Threat strategies (W_T): Overcome internal Weaknesses to avoid external Threats 3.5.5 STRATEGIC POSITION AND ACTION EVALUATION MATRIX- SPACE

SPACE matrix is a managerial tool used to analyze strategy It helps to identify which strategies company should carry out

Depending upon the of organization, numerius variables could make up each of the dimension represented on the axes of the SPACE matrix Factors that were included

Trang 28

Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group NO.6

Griccd) UNIVERSITY | | | a"

earlier in the firm’s EFE and IFE matrix shall be considered in developing Matrix SPACE Steps to develop a SPACE matrix:

Step 1: Choosing a group of variables represent for FS, CA, IS and ES

Step 2: Assessing from +1 to +6 for variables of FS IS and from -1! to -6 for variables of ES CA, which are worst and best respectively Basing on FS and CA to make comparision with competitors, ES and IS to make comparision with other industries

Step 3: Take average score for FS,CA, IS and ES Step 4: Plot these score into SPACE matrix

Step 5: Plus two average value on horizontal and plot this number on horizontal axis Similarly for vertical axis With these two number, we have a new point on the matrix

Step 6: Connect original point to this new point we will have a vector, this vector present the strategy of the evaluated company

Figure I-4: Matrix SPACE Conservative FS Aggressive Market penetration +6 Backward, forward, horizontal integration +5

Market development ia Market penetration Product development 43 Market development

Related diversification +2 Product development

+1 Diversification (related or unrelated ) CA 6 s8 A BB at 1 +1 42 +3 +4 +§S +6 IS

Defensive = Competitive

-3

Retrenchment A Backward, forward, horizontal integration

Divestiture -5 Market penetration Conservative -6 Market development

Liquidation " ES Product development

Trang 29

wig poe ( iI ) ) CT DO! GaMBAOI 11 ()9-¢ roup N Griccd) UNIVERSITY,

Cty +1 ' ơ meant â + ` 1;tin 17 > ‘ \

Irce: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David

Where: FS (financial strength), CA (competitive advantage), IS (industrial strengths) and ES (environmental stableness)

3.5.6 INTERNAL-EXTERNAL MATRIX

IE matrix analysis is to put every parts of company in the below figure: IE xay matrix is built upon two main factors:

Trang 30

Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group NO.6

Griccd) UNIVERSITY project ou

Figure I-6: Internal-External matrix (IE)

Total weighted score IFE

Strong = Average = Weak = : TT epee '4,00-400) (2/00-299) — (1,00-199) § I " H ề (3,00-4,00) | = Medium = 2 (2,00-2,99) IV V VI š oe ee = (1,00-1,99) vn vn IX Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David IE matrix includes:

- Grown and Build (area 1, I, 1V): Appropriate strategies are concentrated growth (access, develop new market, develop new product); integrated strategies (forward, backward and horizontal integration)

- Hold and maintain (area Ill, V, VID): Appropriate strategies are access new market and develop new product

- Harvest or devest (area VI, VIII, IX): cut, liquidate and abolish

ineffective units

3.5.7 GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX

Trang 31

GRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAO1.D109-Group NO.6 UNIVERSITY Figure I-7: Grand strategy matrix Rapid market growth Quadrant I] Quadrant |

Market development Market development Market penetration Market penetration

Product development Product development Horizontal integration Forward Integration

Devestiture Backwar ackward Integration sa

Weak Liquidation Quis Horizonal Integration : Strong

competi Related Diversification competive

tive position iti

7 Quadrant III Quadrant IV

position

Retrenchment Related Diversification Related Diversification Unrelated Diversification Unrelated Diversification Joint venture

Horizontal Diversification Devestiture

Liquidation

Weak market growth

Source: Strategic management concept-Edition 12, Fred E David

3.5.8 QUANTITATIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING MATRIX (QSPM)

QSPM is used to rank strategies to find the best strategies for company This matrix

use all the information from: IFE, EFE, SWOT

To develop a QSPM, there are 6 steps:

Step 1: List strengths and weaknesses (at least 10 factors) and opportunities and threats (at least 10 factors), these factors should be taken from IFE and EFE

Step 2: Assign Weight for these factor, as did in EFE and IFE matrix

Step 3: Identify a set of alternative strategies, organize them into specific groups Step 4: Set attractive score (AS), quantify attractiveness of each alternative strategy This score depends on the impacts that strategy have on the above internal and

Trang 32

apstone project report Ga MBA01.D109-Group N0.6 external factors We will set | — non-attractive, 2 — low-attractive, 3 — fair-attractive, 4 — very-attractive

Step 5: Count total attractive score (TAS) Plus weighted scores with equivalent AS High TAS, high attractiveness of the strategy

Step 6: Summarize total attractive score for each strategy This score show the attractiveness of each strategy

Table I-5: QSPM matrix | ý Important factors Strategies

Weight Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3

AS TAS AS TAS AS TAS Internal factors: Administration, finance, | accounting, marketing, operation, R&D, infromation system External factors: Economic, political, social, cultural, technological Total

Trang 33

Griccs) Capstone project report GaMBA01.DI09-Group N0.6

3.5.9 EXPERIENCES TO CHOOSE BUSINES STRATEGY

It is not simple to build up a strategy for a company because it depends on many

factors in past, present and future; furthermore, it also depends on sector, business

fields There are some experiences in formulating a business strategy: - Firstly, we need to have an appropriate process

- Business objectives must be suitable with company’s circumstance and external environment

- Collecting and analyzing information to find out strengths to enhance and weaknesses to improve

- Evaluating opportunites and threats on the market

- Focus on the most effective strategies of company and ensure the unity between implementing activities

Figure I-8 : Inside of powerhouse of Thac Mo hydro power plant

Trang 34

GR UNIVERSITY ce IGG GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6

CHAPTER II: AN INTRODUCTION TO VIETNAM

ELECTRICITY: STATUS QUO AND DEVELOPMENT

, STATUS QUO

The 500KV ultra-high-voltage transmission lines, which was operated in 1994, has linked a power system in North, Central and Southern of Vietnam to form a electrical system Since 1996, the renewal economics reform of Vietnam

Government has led the continuously growing of the economy over many years Along with its growth, electricity demand is also developed at high speed

Table U-1: Electricity consumption 1990-2009

: he Weight | Age = Weight oe Weight Services | Weght ee - Perpason Loss

Trang 35

Capstone project report GaMBA01.D109-Group N0.6 Griccd) UNIVERSITY | a T00 205 Z8 es | 5B | 13 1981 „ 42 | ` THẾ min 1 A6 226 44 %5 1 | zim | “ma | 4357 8 51468 cS ÉH- | H2 AU Z2 5 563 1 me MD H2 5884 148 Œ6 106 mse Z8H0 S4 Ml I0 Z6 46 s2 84 GH06 128 7 2 _AMĐ HSL | oe ao 288 4 5990 80 7467 133 —— - _ a a | vee Source: EVN source and Master Plan VI

The consumption of electricity in 1990 — 2008 has shown that power consumption in 2009 was 12 times higher than in 1990, with an anually average growth rate of

14 The 2000 — 2009 growth rate of average load demand was about 12.8% Figure II-1: Electricity production 2000-2009

- wet eeneeer ours _ ng Electricity production MWh 100000 90000 80000 + 70000 40008 ——— 30000 20000 10000 | Nam 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

In the first four months of 2010, EVN's electricity production and purchased increased 19.4% over the same period in 2009

1.1 VIETNAM POWER GENERATING STRUCTURE

Until July 2010, total available power of the plant s in Viet Nam was just 18.400MW, largely lower than master diagram VI which has been approved was 21.062MW Because of the late in process of the important electricity sources such

Trang 37

GRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAO!.D109-Group N0.6

UNIVERSITY

1.2 ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION OF EVN FROM 01/2010 TO

09/2010

In the nine months of 2010, electricity production and purchase of EVN was 72.031 billion kWh, reaching 74.25% of the plan, up 15.69 % over the same period last year, including electricity production was 44.001 billion kWh, up 4,34%, outsourcing purchased electricity 28.03 billion kWh, up 39.51% over the same period last year (buying from China: 4.062 billion kWh) Because the water level in the hydropower reservoirs lower than the average 20-25% of electricity for years so the output did not meet the electricity demand, thereby rotate cutting power has to applied By exploitation of resources with high cost as oil-fired power plant s to offset the lack of hydro power power, EVN has suffered losses to 6,500 billion dong

1.3 ELECTRICITY PRICE

1.3.1 ELECTRICITY PRICE IN VIET NAM

Current retail price of electricity sold to consumers remains the Government's price controls, this make negative affects in the negotiation of electricity sale price between electrictity producer and EVN

According to EVN report, average electricity price saling to consumers in 2007- 2009 are as folloss: Table II-2: average electricity sale price in 2007-2009 Everage electricity sale price 2007 2008 2009 VNd/kwh 860.15 871.03 970.79 USD/kwh (1USD= 20.000 VNd) 0043 0.0435 0.485

With controlled electricity sale price, due to benefits EVN will not want to invest electric generating sources or buy electricity from other producers having production cost higher than average electricity sale price

The following are some electricity price that EVN buy from power plants:

Trang 38

Grice) ipstone project report GaMBAO1.D109-Group N0.6

Table II-3: Electricity price at power plants

Average price | NO Name of Power plant Price unit (VND/Kwh;

USD/Kwh)

L it TBK Phu my 2-2 BOT USD 0.039

| 2 TBK Phu my 3 BOT USD 0.048

| 3 Hydropower Can Don BOT _ USD 0.045

L 4 Formusa Thermal Power USD 0.090 ES 5 Hiep Phuoc Thermal Power USD 0.186

6 TBK Ca mau USD 0.050

7 THERMAL POWER Nhon trach 1 USD 0.039

8 TQ 220 Kv- Lao cai USD 0.051

9 TQ 220 Kv- Ha giang USD 0.052

10 Na Duong Thermal Power VND 620

11 Cao Ngan Thermal Power VND 655

12 Hydropower Ngoi San VND 614

13 Hydropower Se San 3A ; VND 496 14 Hydropower Srok Phu Mieng VND 620

15 Cai Lan Thermal Power VND -

16 Hydropower Binh Dien VND 634

7 Hydropower Song Con VND 561

18 Hydropower Nam Chien 2 VND 588

19 Hydropower Bac Binh VND 525

20 Hydropower A Vuong VND 784

21 Hydropower Que Phong VND 610

22 O Mon 1 Thermal Power VND 3.687

23 Pha Lai Thermal Power VND 682

24 Ninh Binh Thermal Power VND 929

25 Thac Ba Hydropower VND 477

26 Thac Mo Hydropower VND 452

27 Vinh Son — Song Hinh Hydropower VND 428 28 Ham Thuan- Dami Hydropower VND 251

29 Ba Ria Thermal Power VND 883

30 Uong Bi Thermal Power VND 754,6

31 Can Tho Thermal Power VND 5.328 32 Thu Duc Thermal Power VND 4.177

33 Phu My Thermal Power VND 667

34 Hai Phong Thermal Power VND 385 35 Quang Ninh Thermal Power VND 462

36 Cua Dat Hydropower VND 630

| 37 Serepok 4 VND 582

Trang 39

GRIGG Capstone project report GaMBAO1!.D109-Group NO.6

UNIVERSITY

As attached in APPENDIX, electric price in developed and developing countries and countries in OECD in 2008-2009 is so higher than in Viet Nam

Average electricity price for industry: 0,133 USD/kwh Average electricity price for household: 0,199 USD/kwh Thailand: According to EGAT”’ annual report in 2009, average sales price is 2.508 Bath/kwh ~ 0.0845 USD/kwh Average Energy Sales Price Metropolitan ectricity Authority (MEA) 2.503 2.478 1.01

Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA) 2.510 2522 (0.48)

Direct customers 2.735 2.594 5.44

Standby power supply 4.15 2.498 69.53 Other minor customers 1,587 1.721 (7.79)

Jverall Average Sales Price 2.508 2.508

Source: EGAT REPORT-2009

In comparison of Viet nam electric sales price of 0,0485 USD with sales price of ).0845USD in Thailand and OECD, we realized that electricity sales price in Viet Nam is still so low and not exactly reflect production cost According to recent Feasibility study for import coal fired thermal power plants such as Long Phu 1, Song Hau, electricity sales prices have to be over 0,07 USD/kwh

Thus, once reaching competive electricity market in Viet Nam, it is necessary to put power plants having high production cost suc as coal fired , electricity sale price will at least approach to Thailand level

Trang 40

UNIVERSITY Capstone project report GaMBAO! D109-Group N0.6 Griccd) | | 2 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRICITY SOURCES TO 2020 2.1 LEGAL DOCUMENTS Currently, the development of Vietnam's power system need is based on the legal basis as follow: 2e

National Plan for Electric Power Development in the Period 2006 - 2015 with due consideration till 2025 prepared by Energy Institute

Ratification of national planning for electricity power development period 2006 -2015 with due consideration till 2025 — Decision No 110/2007/QD - TTg

Announcement No 106/TB-VPCP on 04/28/2010 about Conclusions of Deputy Prime Minister Hoang Trung Hai at the State Steering Committee meeting for the Electricity Planning VI

The across country electricity system connection planning for thermal power centers version 04/2009 by the Energy Institute

Statement to Prime Minister No 4011/BCT-NL of the Ministry of Industry and Trade on 05/5/2009 on electricity centers connection planning to the national electricity system

ELECTRICITY DEMAND FORECAST IN 2008-2025

Ngày đăng: 27/03/2015, 14:14

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w