What Has Government Done to Our Money? by Murray N. Rothbard The Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn University Auburn, Alabama 36832 What Has Government Done to Our Money? Thanks to Burton S. Blumert of Camino Coin, Burlingame, California, for the coins used on the cover. Copyright © 1963, 1985, 1990 by Murray N. Rothbard All rights reserved. Written permission must be secured from the publisher to use or reproduce any part of this book, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or arti- cles. Published by Praxeology Press of the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 90-63803 ISBN: 0-945466-10-2 Introduction to Fourth Edition by Llewellyn H. Rockwell I. Introduction 2 • The Ludwig von Mises Institute Murray N. Rothbard II. Money in a Free Society 1. The Value of Exchange 2. Barter 3. Indirect Exchange 4. Benefits of Money 5. The Monetary Unit 6. The Shape of Money 7. Private Coinage 8. The Proper Supply of Money 9. The Problem of Hoarding 10. Stabilize the Price Level? 11. Coexisting Moneys 12. Money-Warehouses 13. Summary III. Government Meddling With Money 1. The Revenue of Government 2. The Economic Effects of Inflation 3. Compulsory Monopoly of the Mint 4. Debasement 5. Gresham's Law and Coinage 6. Summary: Government and Coinage 7. Permitting Banks to Refuse Payment 8. Central Banking: Removing the Checks on Inflation 9. Central Banking: Directing the Inflation 10. Going Off the Gold Standard 11. Fiat Money and the Gold Problem 12. Fiat Money and Gresham's Law 13. Government and Money IV. The Monetary Breakdown of the West 1. Phase I: The Classical Gold Standard, 1815-1914 2. Phase II: World War I and After 3. Phase III: The Gold Exchange Standard (Britain and the United States) 1926-1931 4. Phase IV: Fluctuating Fiat Currencies, 1931-1945 5. Phase V: Bretton Woods and the New Gold Exchange Standard (the United States) 1945 1968 6. Phase VI: The Unraveling of Bretton Woods, 1968-1971 7. Phase VII: The End of Bretton Woods: Fluctuating Fiat Currencies, August-December, 1971 8. Phase VIII: The Smithsonian Agreement, December 1971-February 1973 9. Phase IX: Fluctuating Fiat Currencies, March 1973-? About the Author About the Ludwig von Mises Institute The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 3 What Has Government Done to Our Money? For citation purposes a sequence of bracketed numbers has been placed in the document corresponding to the original pagination. 4 • The Ludwig von Mises Institute Murray N. Rothbard The Ludwig von Mises Institute wishes to thank the following contributors whose generosity made this volume possible: O.P. Alford, III Burton S. Bulmert Dr. William A. Dunn Robert D. Kephart Victor Niederhoffer The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 5 What Has Government Done to Our Money? 6 • The Ludwig von Mises Institute Murray N. Rothbard Introduction to Fourth Edition Monetary policy is—aside from war—the primary tool of state aggrandizement. It ensures the growth of government, finances deficits, rewards special interests, and fixes elections. Without it, the federal leviathan would collapse, and we could return to the republic of the Founding Fathers. Our monetary system is not only politically abusive, it also causes inflation and the business cycle. What is to be done? In answer to that question, the Mises Institute is pleased to present this fourth and slightly expanded edition of Murray N. Rothbard's classic What Has Government Done to Our Money?. First published in 1964, this is one of Professor Rothbard's most influential works, despite its length. I can't count the number of times academics and nonacademics alike have told me that it forever changed the way they looked at monetary policy. No one, having read this book, hears the pronouncements of Fed officials with awe, or reads monetary texts with credulity. What Has Government Done to Our Money? is the best introduction to money, bar none. The prose is straightforward, the logic relentless, the facts compelling—as in all of Professor Rothbard's writings. [7] His themes here are theoretical, political, and historical. On theory, he agrees with Ludwig von Mises that money originated through voluntary exchanges on the market. No social contract or government edict brought money into being. It is a natural outgrowth of individuals seeking economic relations more complex than barter. But unlike all other commodities, an increase in the stock of money confers no social benefit, since money's main function is to facilitate the exchange of other goods and services. Indeed, increasing the stock of money through a central bank like the Fed has horrific consequences, and Professor Rothbard provides the clearest explanation available of inflation. In policy, he argues that the free market can and should be charged with the production and distribution of money. There is no need to make it a monopoly of the U.S. Treasury, let alone of a public-private banking cartel like the Fed. A successful money needs only a fixed definition rooted in the commodity most suited to a monetary use, and a legal system that enforces contracts and punishes theft and fraud. In a free market, the result has been, and would be, a gold standard. In such a free-market system, money would be convertible domestically and internationally. Demand deposits would have 100% reserves, while the reserve ratios for time deposits would be subject to the economic prudence of bankers and the watchful eye of the consuming public. It is, however, the historical dimension of Professor [8] Rothbard's work that makes it so persuasive. Starting with the 19th-century classical gold standard, he ends with the likely emergence of a European Currency Unit and an eventual world The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 7 What Has Government Done to Our Money? fiat money. Especially notable are his explanations of the Bretton Woods system and the closing of the gold window in the early 1970s. Professor Rothbard shows that government has always and everywhere been the enemy of sound money. Through banking cartels and inflation, government and its favored interests loot the people's earnings, water down the value of the market's money, and cause recessions and depressions. In mainstream economics, most of this is denied or ignored. The emphasis is always on the "best" way to use monetary policy. What should guide the Fed? The GNP? Interest rates? The yield curve? The foreign exchange value of the dollar? A commodity index? Professor Rothbard would tell us that all such questions presuppose central planning, and are the root of monetary evil. May this book be distributed far and wide, so that when the next monetary crisis arrives, Americans will, finally, refuse to put up with what the government is doing to our money. Llewellyn H. Rockwell The Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn University November 1990 [9] 8 • The Ludwig von Mises Institute Murray N. Rothbard The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 9 What Has Government Done to Our Money? I. Introduction Few economic subjects are more tangled, more confused than money. Wrangles abound over "tight money" vs. "easy money," over the roles of the Federal Reserve System and the Treasury, over various versions of the gold standard, etc. Should the government pump money into the economy or siphon it out? Which branch of the government? Should it encourage credit or restrain it? Should it return to the gold standard? If so, at what rate? These and countless other questions multiply, seemingly without end. Perhaps the Babel of views on the money question stems from man's propensity to be "realistic," i.e., to study only immediate political and economic problems. If we immerse ourselves wholly in day-to-day affairs, we cease making fundamental distinctions, or asking the really basic questions. Soon, basic issues are forgotten, and aimless drift is substituted for firm adherence to principle. Often we need to gain perspective, to stand aside from our everyday affairs in order to understand them more fully. This is particularly true in our economy, where interrelations are so intricate that we [11] must isolate a few important factors, analyze them, and then trace their operations in the complex world. This was the point of "Crusoe economics," a favorite device of classical economic theory. Analysis of Crusoe and Friday on a desert island, much abused by critics as irrelevant to today's world, actually performed the very useful function of spotlighting the basic axioms of human action. Of all the economic problems, money is possibly the most tangled, and perhaps where we most need perspective. Money, moreover, is the economic area most encrusted and entangled with centuries of government meddling. Many people—many economists—usually devoted to the free market stop short at money. Money, they insist, is different; it must be supplied by government and regulated by government. They never think of state control of money as interference in the free market; a free market in money is unthinkable to them. Governments must mint coins, issue paper, define "legal tender," create central banks, pump money in and out, "stabilize the price level," etc. Historically, money was one of the first things controlled by government, and the free market "revolution" of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries made very little dent in the monetary sphere. So it is high time that we turn fundamental attention to the life-blood of our economy—money. Let us first ask ourselves the question: Can money be organized under the freedom principle? Can we have a free market in money as well as in other goods and services? What would be the shape of such a market? And what are the effects of various governmental controls? If we favor the free market in other directions, if we wish to eliminate government [12] invasion of person and property, we have no more important task than to explore the ways and means of a free market in money. [13] 10 • The Ludwig von Mises Institute [...]... von Mises Institute • 35 What Has Government Done to Our Money? III Government Meddling With Money 6 Summary: Government and Coinage The compulsory minting monopoly and legal tender legislation were the capstones in governments' drive to gain control of their nations' money Bolstering these measures, each government moved to abolish the circulation of all coins minted by rival governments [10] Within... reduced to fourteen grains Soon the gold coin was too light to circulate, and it was converted into a silver coin weighing twenty-six grains of silver The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 33 What Has Government Done to Our Money? This, too, was debased, and by the mid-fifteenth century, the maravedi was only 1.5 silver grains, and again too small to circulate [7] [7] On debasement, see Elgin Groseclose, Money. .. • 17 What Has Government Done to Our Money? II Money in a Free Society 8 The "Proper" Supply of Money Now we may ask: what is the supply of money in society and how is that supply used? In particular, we may raise the perennial question, how much money "do we need"? Must the money supply be regulated by some sort of "criterion," or can it be left alone to the free market? [29] First, the total stock,... Ludwig von Mises Institute • 19 What Has Government Done to Our Money? gold-unit There is no need to tamper with the market in order to alter the money supply that it determines At this point, the monetary planner might object: "All right, granting that it is pointless to increase the money supply, isn't gold mining a waste of resources? Shouldn't the government keep the money supply constant, and prohibit... and another part to a tailor? Even where the goods are divisible, it is generally impossible for two exchangers to The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 11 What Has Government Done to Our Money? find each other at the same time If A has a supply of eggs for sale, and B has a pair of shoes, how can they get together if A wants a suit? And think of the plight of an economics teacher who has to find an egg¦producer... Contrary to many writers, there is nothing special about money that requires extensive governmental dictation He, too, free men will best and most smoothly supply all their economic wants For money as for all other activities, of man, "liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order." [54] The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 29 What Has Government Done to Our Money? III Government Meddling With Money 1... Institute • 23 What Has Government Done to Our Money? restore the "purchasing power parity" of the exchange rate; as gold gets cheaper in terms of silver, silver prices of goods go up, and gold prices of goods go down The free market, in short, is eminently orderly not only when money is free but even when there is more than one money circulating What kind of "standard" will a free money provide? The... other hand, an increased supply of money will frustrate public demand for a more effective sum total of cash (more 33 effective in terms of purchasing power) The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 21 What Has Government Done to Our Money? People will almost always say, if asked, that they want as much money as they can get! But what they really want is not more units of money more gold ounces or "dollars"—but... for their owners (100 percent reserve) as a matter of course—in fact, it would be considered fraud or theft to do otherwise Their profits are earned from service charges to their customers The banks can charge for their services in the same way If it is objected that The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 25 What Has Government Done to Our Money? customers will not pay the high service charges, this means... resources also promises to add to living standards, present and future But what about money? Does an addition to the money supply also benefit the public at large? Consumer goods are used up by consumers; capital goods and natural resources are used up in the process of producing consumer goods But money is not used up; its function is to act as a medium of exchanges to enable goods and services to . What Has Government Done to Our Money? by Murray N. Rothbard The Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn University Auburn, Alabama 36832 What Has Government Done. What Has Government Done to Our Money? I. Introduction Few economic subjects are more tangled, more confused than money. Wrangles abound over "tight money& quot; vs. "easy money, ". prices, and the money- commodity serves as a common denominator for all prices. Only the establishment of The Ludwig von Mises Institute • 13 What Has Government Done to Our Money? money- prices