1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

Introduction to Fracture Mechanics phần 3 docx

10 321 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 205,9 KB

Nội dung

Plane Crack Problem Airy Stress Function For the plane problem, the equations of equilibrium are satisfied when the stress components are expressed by the Airy stress function through x , , 11 22 xxx rr           21 , , 222 r r rr rr           . 1               x rr r Using these definitions for the stresses and Hooke’s law, the strains can be expressed in terms of . x It can be shown that the compatibility equation, when expressed in terms of the Airy stress function, satisfies the biharmonic equation:   . 11 ,0 2 2 22 2 222            rrrr The boundary conditions for this plane crack problem 22 The boundary conditions for this plane crack problem are: for 0      r .     These conditions express the fact that the crack is traction-free (no loads applied to crack face). Note: there is no condition on . rr  A choice of the Airy stress function for the present crack problem should be such that x has a singularity at the crack tip, and is single-valued. We try a solution of the form:     ,,, 2  rqrpr  23 Where p and p are harmonic functions of r and θ (i.e. and 0 2  p ).0 2  q Now consider a separate solution, of the following form (Williams, 1957):     ,     rR ,sincos 21   rArAp        .2sin2cos 2 2 2 1     rBrBq This form leads to the following expression for x:           2coscos 11 2 BArx       . 2 sin sin 2        B A r 24       . 2 sin sin 22 2        B A r Note that we have expressed x as a symmetric part and an anti-symmetric part. The symmetric part provides the Mode I solution while the anti-symmetric part provides the Mode II solution. We will derive the Mode I solution here. 2 2 r                 2coscos12 11  BAr               rx rr r 1 25           2sin2sin1 11  BAr Apply the boundary conditions:   ,0cos 11    BA     .0sin2 11       BA The admissible cases are: (i) cos λ π = 0, hence where Z is an integer including zero, and thus B 1 = A 1 λ /(λ + 2) or (ii) sin λπ = 0 and hence λ = Z and B 1 = A 1 . Since the governing equations are linear, any linear combination of the admissible solutions provides a solution, hence λ can have any satisfying: 2 12   Z    26 a solution, hence λ can have any satisfying: , 2 Z   Where Z is a positive or negative integer, including zero. Out of all the possible values of λ, how do we decide the appropriate value of λ? The value of λ cannot be found from any mathematical argument. We need to use a physical, based on the total strain energy around the crack tip. From the expressions for the stresses, and Therefore the   r ~ . ~   r 27 for the stresses, and Therefore the strain energy density is given by   r ij ~ . ~   r ij .~ 2 1 2   r ijij  The total strain energy within an annular region,with inner and outer radii r 0 and R, respectively, centered at the crack tip, with unit thickness is   .~ 2 1 00 12 2 0 2 0    drdrrdrd R r ijij R r    28 We assert that the strain energy should be bounded (Φ < ∞) as r 0 0. Using this physical argument, we see that λ > -1. (λ = 1 gives ). If λ < 1, the strain energy will not be bounded. 0  ij  2    Thus the physically admissible values of λ are , 2 )( ,,2, 2 3 ,1, 2 1 ,0, 2 1 Z or   where Z is –1, 0, or a positive integer. Taking the most dominant singular term (λ = 1/2 and thus B 1 =A 1 /3) we find that:  29 we find that:                  2 5 2 1 2 3 2 3 cos 3 1 2 cos rrAr         ~ 2/10 2 1 1   rrrA ijij I ijij  The higher order terms, with exponents greater than zero, vanish as r  0. We write where K I is the stress intensity factor. Thus we have that:  2/ 1 I KA    . ~ 2 jxix I ij I ij r K     30 The first term is the leading singular term for linear elastic mode I crack problems. is a function of θ alone (no r dependence). The second term, generally referred to as the ‘ T term’, is a non-singular term which can be important in some situations involving fatigue. is the Kronecker delta function. I ij  ~ ij  . B 1 =A 1 /3) we find that:  29 we find that:                  2 5 2 1 2 3 2 3 cos 3 1 2 cos rrAr         ~ 2/10 2 1 1   rrrA ijij I ijij  The higher order. values of λ are , 2 )( ,,2, 2 3 ,1, 2 1 ,0, 2 1 Z or   where Z is –1, 0, or a positive integer. Taking the most dominant singular term (λ = 1/2 and thus B 1 =A 1 /3) we find that:  29 we find. of λ? The value of λ cannot be found from any mathematical argument. We need to use a physical, based on the total strain energy around the crack tip. From the expressions for the stresses,

Ngày đăng: 08/08/2014, 17:20