330 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING velocity difference is greater when the channels are spaced farther apart (in systems with chromatic dispersion). To quantify the power penalty due to four-wave mixing, we will use the results of the analysis from [SBW87, SNIA90, TCF+95, OSYZ95]. We start with (2.37) from Section 2.4.8: Pi Pj Pk L2. This equation assumes a link of length L without any loss and chromatic dispersion. Here Pi, Pj, and P~ denote the powers of the mixing waves and Pijk the power of the resulting new wave, ~ is the nonlinear refractive index (3.0 x 10 -8 #m2/W), and dijk is the so-called degeneracy factor. In a real system, both loss and chromatic dispersion are present. To take the loss into account, we replace L with the effective length Le, which is given by (5.24) for a system of length L with amplifiers spaced I km apart. The presence of chromatic dispersion reduces the efficiency of the mixing, and we can model this by assuming a parameter 17ijk , which represents the efficiency of mixing of the three waves at frequencies (_oi, &)j, and o)1,. Taking these two into account, the preceding equation can be modified to ( )2 Pijk 17ijk ~ 3cAe PiPjP L . For on-off keying (OOK) signals, this represents the worst-case power at frequency coijk, assuming a 1 bit has been transmitted simultaneously on frequencies coi, coj, and co~. The efficiency rlij~ goes down as the phase mismatch A/3 between the interfering signals increases. From [SBW87], we obtain the efficiency as .2 [ 4e r]ijk 0t 2 -~-(Aft) 2 1 + (1 e-~ 2 " Here, A/3 is the difference in propagation constants between the different waves, and D is the chromatic dispersion. Note that the efficiency has a component that varies periodically with the length as the interfering waves go in and out of phase. In our examples, we will assume the maximum value for this component. The phase mismatch can be calculated as ,Aft fl i -~- fl j fl k fl i j k , 5.8 Fiber Nonlinearities 331 where fir represents the propagation constant at wavelength )~r. Four-wave mixing manifests itself as intrachannel crosstalk. The total crosstalk power for a given channel coc is given as )-~oi+o)j-~o~=~Oc Pijk. Assume the amplifier gains are chosen to match the link loss so that the output power per channel is the same as the input power. The crosstalk penalty can therefore be calculated from (5.12). Assume that the channels are equally spaced and transmitted with equal power, and the maximum allowable penalty due to FWM is 1 dB. Then if the transmitted power in each channel is P, the maximum FWM power in any channel must be < ~P, where ~ can be calculated to be 0.034 for a 1 dB penalty using (5.12). Since the generated FWM power increases with link length, this sets a limit on the transmit power per channel as a function of the link length. This limit is plotted in Figure 5.30 for both standard single-mode fiber (SMF) and dispersion-shifted fiber (DSF) for three cases: (1) 8 channels spaced 100 GHz apart, (2) 32 channels spaced 100 GHz apart, and (3) 32 channels spaced 50 GHz apart. For SMF the chromatic dispersion parameter is taken to be D = 17 ps/nm-km, and for DSF the chromatic dispersion zero is assumed to lie in the middle of the transmitted band of channels. The slope of the chromatic dispersion curve, dD/d)~, is taken to be 0.055 ps/nm-km 2. We leave it as an exercise (Problem 5.27) to compute the power limits in the case of NZ-DSF. In Figure 5.30, first note that the limit is significantly worse in the case of dispersion-shifted fiber than it is for standard fiber. This is because the four-wave mixing efficiencies are much higher in dispersion-shifted fiber due to the low value of the chromatic dispersion. Second, the power limit gets worse with an increas- ing number of channels, as can be seen by comparing the limits for 8-channel and 32-channel systems for the same 100 GHz spacing. This effect is due to the much larger number of four-wave mixing terms that are generated when the number of channels is increased. In the case of dispersion-shifted fiber, this difference due to the number of four-wave mixing terms is imperceptible since, even though there are many more terms for the 32-channel case, the same 8 channels around the dis- persion zero as in the 8-channel case contribute almost all the four-wave mixing power. The four-wave mixing power contribution from the other channels is small because there is much more chromatic dispersion at these wavelengths. Finally, the power limit decreases significantly if the channel spacing is reduced, as can be seen by comparing the curves for the two 32-channel systems with channel spacings of 100 GHz and 50 GHz. This decrease in the allowable transmit power arises because the four-wave mixing efficiency increases with a decrease in the channel spacing since the phase mismatch Aft is reduced. (For SMF, though the efficiencies at both 332 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING Figure 5.30 Limitation on the maximum transmit power per channel imposed by four-wave mixing for systems operating over standard single-mode fiber and dispersion- shifted fiber. For standard single-mode fiber, D is assumed to be 17 ps/nm-km, and for dispersion-shifted fiber, the chromatic dispersion zero is assumed to lie in the middle of the transmitted band of channels. The amplifiers are assumed to be spaced 80 km apart. 50 GHz and 100 GHz are small, the efficiency at 50 GHz is much higher than at 100 GHz.) Four-wave mixing is a severe problem in WDM systems using dispersion-shifted fiber but does not usually pose a major problem in systems using standard fiber. In fact, it motivated the development of NZ-DSF fiber (see Section 5.7). In general, the following actions alleviate the penalty due to four-wave mixing: 1. Unequal channel spacing: The positions of the channels can be chosen carefully so that the beat terms do not overlap with the data channels inside the receiver bandwidth. This may be possible for a small number of channels in some cases, but needs careful computation of the exact channel positions. 2. Increased channel spacing: This increases the group velocity mismatch between channels. This has the drawback of increasing the overall system bandwidth, requiring the optical amplifiers to be flat over a wider bandwidth, and increases the penalty due to SRS. 3. Using higher wavelengths beyond 1560 nm with DSF: Even with DSF, a signifi- cant amount of chromatic dispersion is present in this range, which reduces the 5.8 Fiber Nonlinearities 333 effect of four-wave mixing. The newly developed L-band amplifiers can be used for long-distance transmission over DSE 4. As with other nonlinearities, reducing transmitter power and the amplifier spac- ing will decrease the penalty. 5. If the wavelengths can be demultiplexed and multiplexed in the middle of the transmission path, we can introduce different delays for each wavelength. This randomizes the phase relationship between the different wavelengths. Effectively, the FWM powers introduced before and after this point are summed instead of the electric fields being added in phase, resulting in a smaller FWM penalty. 5.8.5 Self-/Cross-Phase Modulation As we saw in Section 2.4, SPM and CPM also arise out of the intensity dependence of the refractive index. Fluctuations in optical power of the signal causes changes in the phase of the signal. This induces additional chirp, which in turn, leads to higher chromatic dispersion penalties. In practice, SPM can be a significant consideration in designing systems at 10 Gb/s and higher, and leads to a restriction that the maximum power per channel should not exceed a few milliwatts. CPM does not usually pose a problem in WDM systems unless the channel spacings are extremely tight (a few tens of gigahertz). In this section, we will study the system limitations imposed by SPM. The combined effects of SPM-induced chirp and dispersion can be studied by numerically solving (E.15). For simplicity, we consider the following approximate expression for the width TL of an initially unchirped Gaussian pulse after it has propagated a distance L: TL r Le L ( 4 L2e ) L2 ~- 1 q 2 9 (5.27) TO LNL LD 3~/~ LNL L 2 This expression is derived in [PAP86] starting from (E.15) and is also discussed in [Agr95]. Note the similarity of this expression to the broadening factor for chirped Gaussian pulses in (2.13); Le/LNL in (5.27) serves the role of the chirp factor in (2.13). Consider a 10 Gb/s system operating over standard single-mode fiber at 1.55 #m. Since/32 < 0 and the SPM-induced chirp is positive, from Figure 2.11 we expect that pulses will initially undergo compression and subsequently broaden. Since the SPM-induced chirp increases with the transmitted power, we expect both the extent of initial compression and the rate of subsequent broadening to increase with the 334 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING 2- 1.8 1.6 1.4 ~a 1.2 0.8 0.6 mW,.w 10 i I i , , i l 5~~____~~,'"'"'/ 1 O0 150 200 250 L (km) Figure 5.31 Evolution of pulse width as a function of the link length L for transmitted powers of 1 mW, 10 mW, and 20 mW, taking into account the chirp induced by SPM. A 10 Gb/s system operating over standard single-mode fiber at 1.55/zm with an initial pulse width of 50 ps is considered. transmitted power. This is indeed the case, as can be seen from Figure 5.31, where we use (5.27) to plot the evolution of the pulse width as a function of the link length, taking into account the chirp induced by SPM. We consider an initially unchirped Gaussian pulse of width (half-width at 1/e-intensity point) 50 ps, which is half the bit period. Three different transmitted powers, 1 mW, 10 mW, and 20 mW, are considered. As expected, for a transmit power of 20 mW, the pulse compresses more initially but subsequently broadens more rapidly so that the pulse width exceeds that of a system operating at 10 mW or even 1 mW. The optimal transmit power therefore depends on the link length and the amount of dispersion present. For standard single-mode fiber in the 1.55/zm band, the optimal power is limited to the 2-10 mW range for link lengths on the order of 100 km and is a real limit today for 10 Gb/s systems. We can use higher transmit powers to optimize other system parameters such as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) but at the cost of increasing the pulse broadening due to the combined effects of SPM and dispersion. The system limits imposed by SPM can be calculated from (5.27) just as we did in Figure 5.31. We can derive an expression for the power penalty due to SPM, following the same approach as we did for chromatic dispersion. This is detailed in Problem 5.25. Since SPM can be beneficial due to the initial pulse compression it can cause, the SPM penalty can be negative. This occurs when the pulse at the end of the link is narrower due to the chirping caused by SPM than it would be in the presence of chromatic dispersion alone. 5.9 Wavelength Stabilization 335 5.8.6 In amplified systems, as we saw in Section 5.5, two things happen: the effective length L e is multiplied by the number of amplifier spans as the amplifier resets the power after each span, and in general, higher output powers are possible. Both of these serve to exacerbate the effects of nonlinearities. In WDM systems, CPM aids the SPM-induced intensity dependence of the re- fractive index. Thus in WDM systems, these effects may become important even at lower power levels, particularly when dispersion-shifted fiber is used so that the dispersion-induced walk-off effects on CPM are minimized. Role of Chromatic Dispersion Management As we have seen, chromatic dispersion plays a key role in reducing the effects of non- linearities, particularly four-wave mixing. However, chromatic dispersion by itself produces penalties due to pulse smearing, which leads to intersymbol interference. The important thing to note is that we can engineer systems with zero total chro- matic dispersion but with chromatic dispersion present at all points along the link, as shown in Figure 5.20. This approach leads to reduced penalties due to nonlinear- ities, but the total chromatic dispersion is small so that we need not worry about dispersion-induced penalties. 5.9 Wavelength Stabilization Luckily for us, it turns out that the wavelength drift due to temperature variations of some of the key components used in WDM systems is quite small. Typical mul- tiplexers and demultiplexers made of silica/silicon have temperature coefficients of 0.01 nm/~ whereas DFB lasers have a temperature coefficient of 0.1 nm/~ Some of the other devices that we studied in Chapter 3 have even lower temperature coefficients. The DFB laser source used in most systems is a key element that must be kept wavelength stabilized. In practice, it may be sufficient to maintain the temperature of the laser fairly constant to within +0.1 ~ which would stabilize the laser to within 4-0.01 nm/~ The laser comes packaged with a thermistor and a thermo-electric (TE) cooler. The temperature can be sensed by monitoring the resistance of the thermistor and can be kept constant by adjusting the drive current of the TE cooler. However, the laser wavelength can also change because of aging effects over a long period. Laser manufacturers usually specify this parameter, typically around +0.1 nm. If this presents a problem, an external feedback loop may be required to stabilize the laser. A small portion of the laser output can be tapped off and sent to a wavelength discriminating element, such as an optical filter, called a wavelength locker. The 336 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING output of the wavelength locker can be monitored to establish the laser wavelength, which can then be controlled by adjusting the laser temperature. Depending on the temperature range needed (typically -10 to 60~ for equip- ment in telco central offices), it may be necessary to temperature-control the multiplexer/demultiplexer as well. For example, even if the multiplexer and de- multiplexer are exactly aligned at, say, 25~ the ambient temperature at the two ends of the link could be different by 70~ assuming the given numbers. Assuming a temperature coefficient of 0.01 nm/~ we would get a 0.7 nm difference between the center wavelengths of the multiplexer and demultiplexer, which is clearly intolerable if the interchannel spacing is only 0.8 nm (100 GHz). One problem with tempera- ture control is that it reduces the reliability of the overall component because the TE cooler is often the least reliable component. An additional factor to be considered is the dependence of laser wavelength on its drive current, typically between 100 MHz/mA and i GHz/mA. A laser is typically operated in one of two modes, constant output power or constant drive current, and the drive circuitry incorporates feedback to maintain these parameters at constant values. Keeping the drive current constant ensures that the laser wavelength does not shift because of current changes. However, as the laser ages, it will require more drive current to produce the same output power, so the output power may decrease with time. On the other hand, keeping the power constant may require the drive current to be increased as the laser ages, inducing a small wavelength shift. With typical channel spacings of 100 GHz or thereabouts, this is not a problem, but with tighter channel spacings, it may be desirable to operate the laser in constant current mode and tolerate the penalty (if any) due to the reduced output power. 5.10 Design of Soliton Systems While much of our discussion in this chapter applies to the design of soliton systems as well, there are a few special considerations in the design of these systems, which we now briefly discuss. We discussed the fundamentals of soliton propagation in Section 2.5. Soliton pulses balance the effects of chromatic dispersion and the nonlinear refractive index of the fiber, to preserve their shapes during propagation. In order for this balance to occur, the soliton pulses must not only have a specific shape but also a specific energy. Due to the inevitable fiber attenuation, the pulse energies are reduced, and thus the ideal soliton energy cannot be preserved. A theoretical solution to this problem is the use of dispersion-tapered fibers, where the chromatic dispersion of the fiber is varied suitably so that the balance between chromatic dispersion and nonlinearity is preserved in the face of fiber loss. 5.10 Design of Soliton Systems 337 In practice, soliton propagation occurs reasonably well even in the case of systems with periodic amplification. However, the ASE added by these amplifiers causes a few detrimental effects. The first effect is that the ASE changes the energies of the pulses and causes bit errors. This effect is similar to the effect in NRZ systems although the quantitative details are somewhat different. While solitons have a specific shape, they are resilient to changes in shape. For example, if a pulse with a slightly different energy is launched, it reshapes itself into a soliton component with the right shape and a nonsoliton component. When ASE is added, the effect is to change the pulse shape, but the solitons reshape themselves to the right shape. A second effect of the ASE noise that is specific to soliton systems is that the ASE noise causes random changes to the center frequencies of the soliton pulses. For soliton propagation, per se, this would not be a problem because solitons can alter their frequency without affecting their shape and energy. (This is the key to their ability to propagate long distances without pulse spreading.) To see why this is the case, consider the soliton pulse shape given by U(~, r) = ei~/2sechr. (5.28) Here, the distance ~ and time r are measured in terms of the chromatic dispersion length of the fiber and the pulse width, respectively. The pulse U(~, 75 + ~)e i(f2t+f22~/2 (5.29) is also a soliton for any frequency shift Q, and thus solitons can alter their frequency without affecting their shape and energy. However, due to the chromatic dispersion of the fiber, changes in pulse frequencies are converted into changes in the pulse arrival times, that is, timing jitter. This jitter is called Gordon-Haus jitter, in honor of its discoverers, and is a significant problem for soliton communication systems. A potential solution to this timing jitter problem is the addition of a bandpass filter whose center frequency is close to that of the launched soliton pulse. In the presence of these filters, the solitons change their center frequencies to match the passband of the filters. For this reason, these filters are called guiding filters. This has the effect of keeping the soliton pulse frequencies stable, and hence minimizing the timing jitter. This phenomenon is similar to the solitons reshaping themselves when their shape is perturbed by the added ASE. The problem with the above solution is that the ASE noise accumulates within the passband of the chain of filters. As a result, the transmission length of the system, before the timing jitter becomes unacceptable, is only moderately improved compared to a system that does not use these filters. The solution to this problem 338 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENGINEERING is to change the center frequencies of the filters progressively along the link length. For example, if the filters are used every 20 km, each filter can be designed to have a center frequency that is 0.2 GHz higher than the previous one. Over a distance of 1000 km, this corresponds to a change of 10 GHz. The soliton pulses track the center frequencies of the filters, but the accumulation of ASE noise is lessened. This technique of using sliding-frequency guiding filters significantly minimizes timing jitter and makes transoceanic soliton transmission practical. 5.11 Design of Dispersion-Managed Soliton Systems There are a few drawbacks associated with conventional soliton systems. First, soli- ton systems require fiber with a very low value of anomalous chromatic dispersion, typically D < 0.2 ps/nm-km. This rules out the possibility of using solitons over the existing fiber infrastructure, which primarily uses SMF or NZ-DSF, since these fibers have much higher values of dispersion. Second, solitons require amplifier spacings on the order of 20-25 kmmmuch closer than what is typically used in practical WDM systems. Finally, cross-phase modulation (CPM) in WDM systems using con- ventional solitons causes soliton-soliton collisions, resulting in timing jitter. For these reasons, soliton systems have not been widely deployed. The use of chirped RZ pulses (see Section 2.5.1), also called dispersion-managed (DM) solitons, overcomes all three problems associated with soliton transmission. First, these pulses can be used over a dispersion-managed fiber plant consisting of fiber spans with large local chromatic dispersion, but with opposite signs such that the total, or average, chromatic dispersion is small. This is typical of most fiber plants used today for 10 Gb/s transmission since they consist of SMF or NZ-DSF spans with dispersion compensation. Thus, no special fiber is required. Second, DM solitons require amplification only every 60-80 km, which is compatible with the amplifier spacings in today's WDM systems. Finally, the effect of CPM is vastly reduced because of the large local chromatic dispersion and thus there is no timing jitter problem. For the same reason, the Gordon-Haus jitter is also reduced, and the sliding-frequency guiding filters used in conventional soliton systems are not required. In a dispersion-managed system, the spans between amplifiers consist of fibers with alternating chromatic dispersions, as shown in Figure 5.32. Each fiber could have a fairly high chromatic dispersion, but the total chromatic dispersion is small. For example, each span in a dispersion-managed system could consist of a 50 km anomalous chromatic dispersion segment with a chromatic dispersion of 17 ps/nm-km, followed by a 30 km normal chromatic dispersion segment with a chromatic dispersion of-25 ps/nm-km. The total chromatic dispersion over the span is 50 x 17- 30 x 25 = 100 ps/km. The average chromatic dispersion is 5.11 Design of Dispersion-Managed Soliton Systems 339 Figure 5.32 A typical dispersion-managed span consisting of a segment of fiber with anomalous chromatic dispersion followed by a segment with normal chromatic dispersion. 100/80 = 1.25 ps/nm-km, which is anomalous. A dispersion-managed system could have an average span dispersion that is normal or anomalous. In the same example, if the normal fiber had a chromatic dispersion of -30 ps/nm-km, the average span dispersion would have been -50/80 = -0.625 ps/nm-km, which is normal. When NRZ pulses are used, the average chromatic dispersion can be anomalous or normal, without having a significant impact on system performance. However, in a DM soliton system, the average chromatic dispersion must be designed to be anomalous in order to maintain the shape of the DM solitons. This is similar to the case of conventional solitons, but with the crucial difference that the chromatic dispersion need not be uniformly low and anomalous. An important aspect of the design of DM soliton systems is the choice of the peak transmit power and the average chromatic dispersion. Both should lie within a certain range in order to achieve low BER operation. This range can be plotted as a contour in a plot of peak transmit power versus average chromatic dispersion, as shown in Figure 5.33. In this figure, we show a typical contour for achieving a BER of 10 -~2 (or ~, = 7) in a 5160 km system with 80 km spans. For values ofthe transmit power and average chromatic dispersion lying within this contour, the desired BER is achieved or exceeded. In the same plot, the contour for a 2580 km NRZ system with 80 km spans is also shown. In both NRZ and DM soliton systems, the allowed transmit power has both a lower bound, determined by OSNR requirements, and an upper bound determined by fiber nonlinear effects. From Figure 5.33, note that not only is the DM soliton system capable of achieving regeneration-free transmission for twice the distance as the NRZ system, it is also able to tolerate a much wider range of variation in the transmit power and the average chromatic dispersion. . constant at wavelength )~r. Four-wave mixing manifests itself as intrachannel crosstalk. The total crosstalk power for a given channel coc is given as )-~ oi+o)j-~o~=~Oc Pijk. Assume the amplifier. dispersion that is normal or anomalous. In the same example, if the normal fiber had a chromatic dispersion of -3 0 ps/nm-km, the average span dispersion would have been -5 0/80 = -0 .625 ps/nm-km, which. required to stabilize the laser. A small portion of the laser output can be tapped off and sent to a wavelength discriminating element, such as an optical filter, called a wavelength locker.