1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

PRODUCT LIABILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE pptx

379 478 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Cấu trúc

  • Cover

  • Half-title

  • Title

  • Copyright

  • Contents

  • Figures

  • Foreword

  • Contributors

  • Preface

  • 1 Introduction

    • Product liability and overlapping interests

    • The European Directive and harmonisation

      • Product liability: why compare?

    • Contents of the book

  • Part I: Country reports

    • 2 The use of comparative law in A & Others v National Blood Authority

      • Introduction

      • The medicine

      • The English legal principles

      • Preparation of the case

        • German law

        • Travaux préparatoires

        • Consulting the retired draftsman of the directive

        • Research in other EC Member States and in the United States concerning relevant writings and judicial experience

        • Carrying out research at the Max Planck Institute

        • Collecting all language versions of the legislation and preparing translations of other material

      • The request for a reference in 1999

      • The non-issues

        • Product

        • Producer

      • Consumer Protection Act versus Directive

      • The core issues

      • Comparative law features of the oral argument

      • The judgment

      • Envoi

      • Postscript by Nicholas Underhill QC

      • Afterword byMr Justice Burton

    • 3 Spanish product liability today – adapting to the ‘new’ rules

      • Introduction: the application of the Spanish Product Liability Act by the courts

      • Consumer Protection Act or Product Liability Act: which rules apply?

      • Strict liability versus fault liability. Which grounds for liability?

      • The legal concept of ‘product’: products or services?

      • The legal concept of ‘defect’. Manufacturing defects or useless products?

      • The legal concept of ‘manufacturer’: back door for the supplier?

      • Defences, in particular, the full development-risks defence for public bodies

      • Recoverable damage: how to compensate non-pecuniary loss and the problem of the ‘lower threshold’

        • Compensation for death and personal injury

      • The 500 ECU threshold

      • Conclusion

    • 4 Interaction between the European Directive on Product Liability and the former liability regime in Italy

      • Introduction

      • Italian background to the European Directive

        • The implementation of the European Directive

        • Definition of a product’s defect

        • The role of warnings and advertising

        • The expectation test and the distribution of liability between the parties

        • Manufacturer liability

        • Court’s pro-claimant attitude: joint and several liability

        • Recovery for emotional distress

        • The use of presumptions

        • Drawing a consumer model

      • The (dis)advantages of the European Directive in competition with other liability regimes

        • Limitations to the consumer’s right of claim

        • Product liability function betrayed

        • Access to justice in mass tort cases

      • Conclusion

    • 5 L’exception française? The French lawof product liability

      • Introduction

      • Damages liability under French law

      • Law of contract

        • Obligation to guarantee against defects

        • Obligation de sécurité

      • Tort law

        • Article 1384 (1) of the French Civil Code

      • Implementation of the Directive

        • González Sánchez v Medicina Asturiana SA

        • Commission v France

          • Damage

          • Liability of suppliers

          • Defences

      • Parallel regimes and extent of harmonisation

      • Conclusion

    • 6 German product liability law: between European Directives, American Restatements and common sense

      • Introduction

      • Product liability based on pre-market defects

        • Contract

        • Tort

          • 1. Breach of a duty of care

          • 2. Breach of statutory duty

        • Product Liability Act

          • 1. Defect

          • 2. Proof of defect without proving the specific defect

          • 3. Defences

          • 4. Causation

        • Liability based on breach of post-marketing duties

          • Duty of care

          • Product safety laws

        • Liability for drugs

          • Background

          • Scope of the Drug Act

          • Defective drug

          • Causation

          • Compulsory insurance

        • Liability for genetically modified products

        • State compensation schemes

        • Practice and procedure

          • Pre-trial discovery

          • Experts

          • Trial on preliminary issues

          • Fee arrangements and legal costs

          • Class or representative actions

    • 7 Dutch case law on the EU Product Liability Directive

      • Introduction

      • Defect and development risk defence

      • Presentation of the product and expected use

      • Proof of the defect

      • Proof of causal relationship between defect and damage

      • Information about the identity of producer or importer

      • Putting a product into circulation

      • The position of the supplier

      • The DES-case: proof of causation

      • Conclusion

    • 8 Defect in English law – lessons for the harmonisation of European product liability

      • Comparative law in the courtroom

      • Strict liability is different from negligence

      • General standard

      • Relevant factors

      • Non-standard products

      • Warnings

      • Implications

      • Application of defectiveness standard across Europe

      • Development risks

      • Development of European private law

  • Part II: European influences

    • 9 Product liability: basic problems in a comparative law perspective

      • Negligence or strict liability?

      • Was this decision correct?

      • Is the limitation of the amount of damages an essential feature of strict liability?

      • Development risk liability

    • 10 The development risks defence

      • Introduction

      • History

      • Implementation

      • The meaning of the defence

      • Decided cases

        • Early cases

        • The infringement proceedings

          • 1. The legal meaning of the provisions

          • 2. The arguments of the parties

          • 3. The Opinion of Advocate General Tesauro

          • 4. The judgment of the Court of Justice

          • 5. Discussion

        • Cases after the Infringement Proceedings

        • Unresolved issues

          • State of knowledge

          • Accessibility

          • Knowledge

          • Wide or narrow interpretation

          • Conduct of the producer

          • Manufacturing defects

          • Discoverability in the individual product

          • Definition of defect

        • Reform

        • Conclusion

    • 11 Approaches to product liability in the EU and Member States

      • The essential components of product liability

        • Substantive law

        • Funding and financial risk

        • Procedure

        • Damages

        • Jurisdictional issues

      • Does the Community have jurisdictional competence to propose a new Directive on product liability?

      • Conclusion

    • 12 Product liability – a history of harmonisation

      • Introduction

      • How much harmonisation is necessary?

      • Modernisation

      • Defect and development risk

      • Conclusion

  • Part III: Comparing systems

    • 13 Harmonisation or divergence? A comparison of French and English product liability rules

      • Liability according to the legislative rules

        • The liability of the manufacturer

        • The liability of the supplier

        • French court decisions under the new regime

      • The contractual and extra-contractual actions

        • The English law

        • The French law

      • The future of liability rules in France following the incorporation of the Directive

      • Conclusion

    • 14 Product liability law in Central Europe and the true impact of the Product Liability Directive

      • Introduction

      • Methodology and structure of the study

      • The political momentum for the implementation of the Directive – Central Europe striving to join the European Union

      • Implementation of the Directive

      • The internal momentum for change – Central Europeans striving for strict liability and beyond

      • The context of product liability laws in Europe – consumer policies, consumer position and consumer law – differences between the East and the West

      • Central Europe and consumers – particular sources of divergences

      • Central European legal systems and their effect upon the product liability regimes

      • Central European product liability regime – before the implementation of the Directive and the new regulation

        • Introductory remarks

      • Contractual liability

      • Tortious liability

        • Legal bases of tortious liability regimes

      • The possible defendants – fromthe seller to the manufacturer and the importer

      • The beneficiaries of the product liability regime – possible claimants

      • Products within the scope of application of product liability laws

      • The requisites of tortious product liability:

        • Introduction into circulation of a defective product

          • 1. Introduction into circulation

          • 2. Defective product

          • 3. Fault – the attribute of the defendant’s conduct

          • 4. Defences in a ‘fault’ liability system of Central European tort law and in the ‘strict’ liability system of the Directive

        • Damages

        • Causal link between the defendant’s act and the damage

          • 1. Time limits for bringing action

        • Conclusion

    • 15 Bugs in Anglo­American products liability

      • Introduction

      • Rough comparison of common law systems: formand substance of product regimes

      • Orientation of United States products regimes

      • Orientation of the European Union Directive and its clones

      • Pre-manufacture generic infection cases

      • Pre-manufacture generic infections: some United Kingdom statistics

      • Response of the Restatement Third

      • Response of the Directive and its clones: the problem of the European Commission and the ‘official’ record

      • Response of the Directive and its clones: the Hepatitis C judgment

      • Other responses to pre-manufacture generic infection cases

      • Conclusion

    • 16 Comparing product safety and liability law in Japan: from Minamata to mad cows and Mitsubishi

      • Mitsubishi, mad cows and Minamata

      • Comparing product liability and safety in Japan

      • Americanisation, Europeanisation or globalisation?

  • Appendix Council Directive of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the law, regulations and administrative…

    • THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

    • HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE

      • Article 1

      • Article 2

      • Article 3

      • Article 4

      • Article 5

      • Article 6

      • Article 7

      • Article 8

      • Article 9

      • Article 10

      • Article 11

      • Article 12

      • Article 13

      • Article 14

      • Article 15

      • Article 16

      • Article 17

      • Article 18

      • Article 19

      • Article 20

      • Article 21

      • Article 22

  • Index

Nội dung

This page intentionally left blank PRODUCT LIABILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE This book examines the law of product liability from a comparative per- spective. With the European Directive on Product Liability enacted over twenty years ago, this publication analyses the state of product liability in anumberofkeyjurisdictions including both Western European countries and new Member States. Account is also taken of recent developments further afield, including the United States and Japan. Distinguished con- tributors, including a high court judge, European Commission official, leading litigators and academics, provide individual country reports and a number of integrated comparative studies. The book is designed for prac- tical use by legal practitioners, academics, students and others interested in the area of contract, tort, civil procedure and multi-party litigation. In particular, practitioners will find the country reports an essential reference point. duncan fairgrieve is Director of the Tort Law Centre at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, and is also Ma ˆ ıtre de Conf ´ erences at Sciences Po, Paris. He is a qualified French avocat and practises in the fields of product liability and commercial litigation in Paris. PRODUCT LIABILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Edited by DUNCAN FAIRGRIEVE    Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge  ,UK First published in print format - ---- - ---- © Cambridge University Press 2005 Information on this title: www.cambrid g e.or g /9780521847230 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. - --- - --- Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of s for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org hardback eBook (EBL) eBook (EBL) hardback CONTENTS List of figures page vii Foreword by Sir Michael Burton ix List of contributors x Preface xiii 1Introduction 1 Duncan Fairgrieve and Luis Gonz´alez Vaqu´e part i Country reports 2Theuse of comparative law in A&Others v National Blood Authority 13 Michael Brooke and Ian Forrester, Postscript by Nicholas Underhill, Afterword by Sir Michael Burton 3Spanish product liability today – adapting to the ‘new’ rules 42 Miquel Mart´ın-Casals 4Interaction between the European Directive onProduct Liability and the former liability regime in Italy 67 Eleonora Rajneri 5 L’Exception fran¸caise? The French law of product liability 84 Duncan Fairgrieve 6German product liability law: between European Directives, American Restatements and common sense 100 Stefan Lenze 7Dutch case law on the EU Product Liability Directive 126 Cees C. van Dam v vi contents 8Defect in English law – lessons for the harmonisation of European product liability 138 Geraint Howells part ii European influences 9Productliability: basic problems in a comparative law perspective 155 Hans Claudius Taschner 10 The development risks defence 167 Mark Mildred 11 Approaches to product liability in the EU and Member States 192 Christopher Hodges 12 Product liability – a history of harmonisation 202 Geraint Howells part iii Comparing systems 13 Harmonisation or divergence? A comparison of French and English product liability rules 221 Simon Taylor 14 Product liability law in Central Europe and the true impact of the Product Liability Directive 244 Magdalena Sengayen 15 Bugs in Anglo-American products liability 295 Jane Stapleton 16 Comparing product safety and liability law in Japan: from Minamata to mad cows – and Mitsubishi 334 Luke Nottage Appendix 341 Index 350 FIGURES 16.1 Comparative PL law trajectories page 337 16.2 PL litigation in Japan over the 1990s 338 vii [...]... within the US and Europe, taking as a focus the increasingly controversial topic of pathogenically infected products, such as bacterial and viral infection of products, and diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD).40 Dr Luke Nottage examines the impact of the principles underpinning the European Directive in Japan.41 For ease of use, the text of the European Directive on Product Liability is included... of approach in reaching that outcome.15 The growing use of comparative law poses a challenge to judges and counsel It is recognised that scholarship also has an important role to play in making comparative material available in a systematic manner The role of comparative law in the judicial process is subject to increasing scrutiny, covering topics as diverse as the relevance and weight of comparative. .. publications examining European product liability in comparative perspective. 20 Any comparative study of 17 18 19 20 [2001] 3 All ER 289; [2001] Lloyd’s Rep Med 187 For detailed discussion, see chapter 2 For more details of the BIICL Product Liability Database, see www.biicl.org See e.g P Kelly and R Altree (eds.), European Product Liability (London: Butterworths, 1992); G Howells, Comparative Product Liability. .. publication of Comparative Product Liability, edited by Professor C J Miller and published by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law in association with the United Kingdom National Committee for Comparative Law The time was thus ripe to examine the topic again The origin of this book is a research project undertaken by the Tort Law Centre at the British Institute of International and Comparative. .. required translation in whole or in part into English German law The Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, Germany’s supreme civil court) rendered a series of judgments from 1956 concerning product liability In each case, undoubted injury was done due to the failure of a product: the fork of a bicycle broke and injured the rider; a mineral water bottle exploded, injuring a child; a consignment of vaccine infected a flock... unification We turn thus to the role of comparative law Product liability: why compare? Comparative law is increasingly recognised as an essential reference point for judicial decision-making Whilst the English courts have long been open to considering how legal problems are solved in other jurisdictions, and in tort cases the courts have even showed an interest in looking further afield than common law jurisdictions,14... appears to be considerable divergence in both systems, due in large part to the continuing co-existence of, and, in France, the preference for, pre-existing parallel liability systems The European theme is continued in the contribution of Magdalena Sengayen which touches upon a topic largely unexplored in Western academic writing, that of the product liability laws in Central Europe, namely Poland, the... extraordinary book, in which I am honoured to be included, and which I am even more privileged to be able to introduce It contains contributions from an array of the leading thinkers in the field of product liability; and it provides substantial food (non-standard, and certainly not defective) for thought for practitioners, academics and students alike The British Institute of International and Comparative. .. applying and interpreting that primary legislation This comes to the fore in the application of the Product Liability Directive The potential role for comparative law, as well as the challenges that it poses, are well illustrated in the seminal product liability case of A v National Blood Authority,17 in which Mr Justice Burton drew extensively upon comparative law as a core aspect of his decision-making.18... Comparative Law has been in the forefront of debate in the field of product liability, organising conferences from which no self-respecting practitioner or academic in the area could afford to be absent, and now, after ‘rounding-up all the usual suspects’, producing this totally riveting book As the judge in the Hepatitis C litigation, I had the opportunity of climbing a steep learning curve, supervised . page intentionally left blank PRODUCT LIABILITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE This book examines the law of product liability from a comparative per- spective. With the European Directive on Product. contents 8Defect in English law – lessons for the harmonisation of European product liability 138 Geraint Howells part ii European in uences 9Productliability: basic problems in a comparative law perspective. important role to play in making comparative material available in asystematic manner. The role of comparative law in the judicial process is subject to increasing scrutiny, covering topics as diverse

Ngày đăng: 28/06/2014, 21:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN