MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAININGHO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OFTECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATIONFINAL REPORTResearch on The Effect of Brand Ambassador onCosmetic Purchase Intention in Ho Chi Min
Trang 1MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION
FINAL REPORT Research on The Effect of Brand Ambassador on Cosmetic Purchase Intention in Ho Chi Minh City
Course Code: PLSK320605E
Class Code: 212PLSK320605E_01CLC
Student Performance: Group 1
Lecturer: Ph.D.TRUONG THI HOA
Ho Chi Minh City, June in 2022
Trang 2LIST OF MEMBERS PARTICIPANTING IN THE REPORT
SEMESTER II, SCHOOL YEAR: 2021-2022
- Testing research model and hypotheses
Trang 3- Clean dataset
- Descriptive statistics
- Run data
- Testing reliability of measurement scales (cronbach’s alpha)
4 Tô Thanh Th@y 20124228 - Make questionnaire
85%
6 H+ Th9 Thu HuyFn 20124185 - Make questionnaire
- Create table survey
- Make codebook
- Survey
- Clean dataset
- Exploratory factor analysis EFA
100%
7 Ngô Đ+o PhưHng CIt 20124212 - Make questionnaire 100%
Trang 4- Survey
- Clean dataset
- Descriptive statistics
- Exploratory factor analysis EFA Note Leader: Nguy*n Ho+ng Thi Thơ
Lecturer’s Comment
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
………
Date Month Year
Score
Trang 5Table of Contents
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS i
LIST OF TABLES ii
LIST OF FIGURES i v CHAPTER 1: RESEARCH OVERVIEW 1
1.1 Reason to choose the research topic 1
1.2 Research objective 2
1.3 Research question 2
1.4 Research object and research subject 2
1.5 Research method 2
1.6 Research structure 3
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2.1 Theoretical foundation 4
2.1.1 Brand Ambassador 4
2.1.2 Purchase Intention 4
2.1.3 Theory of Consumer Behavior 5
2.1.4 Theory on the impact of brand ambassadors on consumer behavior 5
2.2 Related Studies Matrix 6
2.3 Research hypotheses 6
2.3.1 Reliability 6
2.3.2 Attractiveness 7
2.3.4 Familiarity 8
2.3.5 Suitability 9
2.3.6 Negative Information 9
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH PROCESS 11
3.1 Research process 11
3.2 The process of building the scale, and designing the survey form 12
3.2.1 The process of building the scale 13
Trang 63.2.2 Design of questionnaires and surveys 16
3.3 Sampling process and data collection 16
3.3.1 Sample selection process 16
3.3.2 Data collection process 17
3.4 Quantitative analysis 17
3.4.1 Summary of the quantitative analysis process 17
3.4.2 Check the difference between statistical groups (Descriptive Statistics) 18
3.4.3 Quantitative analytical methods 18
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH CONCLUSIONS 22
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 22
4.1.1 Frequancy table and descriptive statistics 22
4.1.2 CROSS TABULATION TABLES 24
4.1.3 Graphs 29
4.2 TESTING RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT SCALES (CRONBACH’S ALPHA) 30
4.2.1 Reliability Scale 30
4.2.2 Attraction Scale 31
4.2.3 Specialization Scale 32
4.2.4 Familiarity Scale 33
4.2.5 Suitability Scale 34
4.2.6 Negative Information Scale 35
4.2.7 Purchase Intention Scale 36
4.3 EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS EFA 37
4.3.1 Exploratory Factor Analysis EFA with Independent variables 37
4.3.2 Exploratory Factor Analysis EFA with Dependent variable 42
4.4 TEST MODELS AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESES 45
4.4.1 Correlation Analysis 45
4.4.2 Regresstion Analysis 47
CHAPTER 5: RESEARCH CONCLUSIONS 56
REFERENCES 58
APPENDIX 63
Trang 7Appendix 1: QUESTIONNAIRE 63 Appendix 2: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 69 Appendix 3: TESTING RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENT SCALES (CRONBACH’S ALPHA) 72 Appendix 4: EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFA) 76 Appendix 5: TEST MODELS AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESES 82
Trang 8P a g e | iTABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS
2 e-WOM Electronic Word of Mouth
3 V.I.P Very Important Person
4 EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis
5 KMO Kaiser– Meyer– Olkin
6 VIF Variance Inflation Factor
7 D-W Durbin-Watson Value
Trang 9P a g e | iiLIST OF TABLES
Table 3.2.1 - Table of Scales
Table 4.1.1.1 - Frequency tables
Table 4.1.1.2 - Descriptive Statistics
Table 4.1.2.1 - Thu nhap*Hoc van Crosstabulation
Table 4.1.2.2 - Hoc van*Nghe nghiep*Gioi tinh Crosstabulation
Table 4.1.2.3 - Custom Tables
Table 4.2.1 - Results of assessment of Reliability Scale
Table 4.2.2 - Results of assessment of Attraction Scale
Table 4.2.3 - Results of assessment of Specialization Scale
Table 4.2.4 - Results of assessment of Specialization Scale
Table 4.2.5 - Results of assessment of Specialization Scale
Table 4.2.6 - Results of assessment of Negative Information Scale
Table 4.2.7 - Results of assessment of Purchase Intention Scale
Table 4.3.1.1 - KMO and Bartlett test results for independent variables
Table 4.3.1.2 – Total Variance Explained
Table 4.3.1.3 - The first exploratory factor analysis results
Table 4.3.1.4 - KMO and Bartlett’s Test result for independent variables for the final
Table 4.3.1.5 – Total Variance Explained
Table 4.3.1.6 - Final exploratory factor analysis results
Table 4.3.2.1 - KMO and Bartlett’s Test - scale of entrepreneurship intention of students
Table 4.3.2.2 – Total Variance Explained
Table 4.3.2.3 – Component Matrix
Table 4.4.1 - Correlation analysis results
Table 4.4.2.1 - Variables Entered/Removeda
Table 4.4.2.2 - Explanatory Level of the Model
Trang 10P a g e | iii
Table 4.4.2.3 - Model Fit: Analysis of Variance ANOVA
Table 4.4.2.4 - Table Residuals Statisticsa
Table 4.4.2.5 - Table Model Summaryb
Table 4.4.2.6 - Statistical analysis of regression coefficients
Trang 11P a g e | ivLIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.3 - Research Model
Figure 3.1 – 12-step Research Process
Figure 4.1.3 - Pie Chart Percent of tuoi
Figure 4.4.2.1 – 4.4.2.4 - Scatter charts
Figure 4.4.2.5 - Histogram of the normalized residuals
Figure 4.4.2.6 - Histogram
Figure 4.4.2.7 - Scatterplot: Regression Standardized Residual
Trang 86P a g e | 75
PURCHASE INTENTION SCALE
Trang 87P a g e | 76Appendix 4: EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFA)
Exploratory Factor Analysis EFA with Independent variables.
Part 1
Trang 88P a g e | 77
Trang 89P a g e | 78Part 2
Total Variance Explained
Rotated Component Matrixa
Trang 90P a g e | 79
o Exploratory Factor Analysis EFA with Dependent variable.
Trang 91P a g e | 80
Appendix 5 : TEST MODELS AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESES
Trang 92P a g e | 81
Regression Analysis
Trang 93P a g e | 82
Hypothesis
CHECK THE VIOLATION OF ASSUMPTIONS
ASSUMPTION 1: CHECK SCATTERPLOT
Trang 94P a g e | 83
Trang 95P a g e | 84
ASSUMPTION 2: RESIDUALS ARE NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
Trang 96P a g e | 85
Trang 97P a g e | 86ASSUMPTION 3: DURBIN-WATSON VALUE
ASSUMPTION 4: NO OR LITTLE MULTICOLLINEARITY: THE
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES ARE NOT HIGHLY CORRELATED WITH EACH OTHER [COV(XI,XJ) =0]
ASSUMPTION 5: VIOLATION OF ASSUMPTIONS
Trang 98P a g e | 87