Lecture Communication research: Asking questions, finding answers (4e) Chapter 10: Testing for differences. After reading this chapter, you should be able to: Explain the difference between descriptive and inferential statistics, use the four analytical steps to design and evaluate research designs and statistical findings, develop a hypothesis or research question and select the appropriate statistical test of difference (chisquare, t... Đề tài Hoàn thiện công tác quản trị nhân sự tại Công ty TNHH Mộc Khải Tuyên được nghiên cứu nhằm giúp công ty TNHH Mộc Khải Tuyên làm rõ được thực trạng công tác quản trị nhân sự trong công ty như thế nào từ đó đề ra các giải pháp giúp công ty hoàn thiện công tác quản trị nhân sự tốt hơn trong thời gian tới.
Trang 1TESTING FOR RELATIONSHIPS
Chapter 11
Trang 2• 2 continuous variables
Regression
• 2 or more continuous level variables
Trang 3BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Data collected from sample to draw conclusion about population
Data from normally distributed population
Appropriate variables are selected to be tested using theoretical models
Participants randomly selected
Trang 4ALTERNATIVE AND NULL HYPOTHESES
Inferential statistics test the likelihood that the
alternative hypothesis is true and the null hypothesis
is not
Significance level of 05 is generally the criterion for
this decision
If p 05, then alternative hypothesis accepted
If p > 05, then null hypothesis is retained
Trang 5FOUR ANALYTICAL STEPS
1 Statistical test determines if a relationship
exists
2 Examine results to determine if the
relationship found is the one predicted
3 Is the relationship significant?
4 Evaluate the process and procedures of
collecting data
Trang 6 Also known as Pearson product-moment correlation
coefficient
Represented by r
Correlation reveals one of the following:
Scores on both variables increase or decrease
Scores on one variable increase while scores on the other
variable decrease
There is no pattern or relationship
Trang 7 Correlation coefficient or r reveals the degree to which
two continuous level variables are related
Participants provide measures of two variables
If p of the r statistic is 05
relationship is significant
hypothesis or research question accepted
Correlation cannot necessarily determine causation
Trang 8INTERPRETING THE COEFFICIENT
Direction of relationship
Positive– both variables
increase or both
variables decrease
Negative – one variable
increases while the
other decreases
Relationship strength
< 30 – weak or slight
relationship
.30-.70 – moderate or
substantial relationship
>.70 – strong or dependable
relationship
Trang 9SCALE OF CORRELATION
Trang 10DEGREE OF SHARED VARIANCE
r 2 – represents the
percentage of variance
two variables have in
common
Known as coefficient of
determination
Found by squaring r
• .2 or -.2 = 04 r 2
• .3 or -.3 = 09 r 2
• .4 or -.4 = 16 r 2
• .5 or -.5 = 25 r 2
• .6 or -.6 = 36 r 2
• .7 or -.7 = 49 r 2
• .8 or -.8 = 64 r 2
• .9 or -.9 = 81 r 2
Trang 11CORRELATION MATRIX
Trang 12LIMITS OF CORRELATION
Examines relationship between only 2 variables
Any relationship is presumed to be linear
Limited in the degree to which inferences can
be made
Correlation does not necessarily equal causation
Causation depends on the logic of relationship
Trang 13 Predicts some variables by knowing others
Assesses influence of several continuous level
predictor, or IVs, on a single continuous criterion, or DV
Used to examine causation without experimentation
“Variance accounted for”
the % of variance in the criterion variable accounted for by
the predictor variable
Trang 14LINEAR REGRESSION
Regression line – line drawn through the data
points that best summarizes the relationship
between the IV and DV
The better the fit of the line, the higher R
Adjusted R 2 – the proportion of variance
explained or accounted for on the DV by the IV
Trang 15BETA WEIGHTS
Also known as beta coefficients
Represented by β
Allows comparison among variables of different measuring units
Range from +1.00 to –1.00
Trang 16MULTIPLE REGRESSION
Tests for significant relationship between one
DV and multiple IVs
Independently
As a group
Use beta weights to interpret the relative
contribution of each IV
Trang 17STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
Exogenous variable
Endogenous variable
Is the theoretical model different from associations found in the data?
Trang 18STATISTICAL TEST OF RELATIONSHIP
Trang 19CAUTION IN USING STATISTICS
Use and interpretation of statistical tests is subjective
Many variations of each test
Researcher must interpret statistical result
Are the results worth interpreting statistically?
Was appropriate statistical test selected and used?
Are the results statistically significant?
Are the results socially significant?