Báo cáo khoa học nông nghiệp " Improving capability of provincial extensionists for assessing soil constraints to sustainable production through the use of the SCAMP decision support system ( Attachment 2 )" pdf
009/06 VIE Final Report 2009 Attachment2 1 009/06 VIE: ImprovingcapabilityofprovincialextensionistsforassessingsoilconstraintstosustainableproductionthroughtheuseoftheSCAMPdecisionsupport system. SCAMP Training Course Tay Ninh February , 2009 Pre- and post- training survey The 27 participants at the training course were given a pre- and post-course questionnaire. The pre- course questionnaire was designed to determine what the participants considered were the major soilconstraintsto productivity in their villages. The post-course questionnaire was designed to measure any changed perceptions of major soilconstraints and to determine what follow-up actions the participants planned to take when they returned from the course. Pre-course survey Sandy soil is one ofthe major cropping soil groups of Tay Ninh province. The structure ofsoil is weak and loose. This results in low water holding capacity and poor soil fertility. As a consequence, productive capacity can be seriously constrained. Questions Participants (%) 1. What are the main crops grown in your location? Fruit Peanut Maize Vegetable Sugar Rubber Cashew Flower Cassava Tobacco Pepper Coffee Grass 44 44 41 41 33 30 26 26 26 15 11 9 7 2. What are thesoil groups? Participants (%) Fluvisols Gleysols Acrisols Ferralsols Clay loam Loam Clays 96 77 44 19 26 22 11 009/06 VIE Final Report 2009 Attachment22 Sandy soils 4 3. What are theconstraintsto productive agricultural systems? Participants (%) Weak soil structure and erosion Shallow topsoil No organic amendments are applied Cultivation system is unsuitable Using inorganic fertilizer for several years leads tosoil degradation There is a large area of low fertility Acrisols Cropping system is unsuitable Irrigation system is unsuitable Unplanned and inappropriate land use Unsustainable management practices No soil maps of quality assessment Local policy Urbanization leads to decrease in cultivated area Gley soil is difficult for cropping 26 26 26 26 22 22 15 11 11 11 11 7 4 4 According tothe pre-course survey, many participants believe that the soils are infertile and this is a major reason forthe application of inorganic fertilizer. Weak soil structure is identified as a cause of susceptibility to erosion. There is no widespread useof organic materials. 4. What are thesoil characteristics that impact on soil fertility and productivity that need to be improved? Participants (%) Physical and chemical characteristics pH Soil structure Organic matter in soilSoil permeability and drainage Erosion hazard Irrigation water quality Buffer capacity ofsoil Slope Hard-setting soil surface Gley characteristics 48 41 26 22 15 11 11 11 7 7 4 Over 40% of participants suggested that it is necessary to improve soil pH and soil physical and chemical characteristics to improve productivity. From 22-26% of participants said that soil structure and soil organic matter should be improved. 009/06 VIE Final Report 2009 Attachment2 3 5. What are some methods forimprovingsoil productivity? Participants (%) Apply cow dung, organic amendments Use bio-fertilizer Retain crop residues Control erosion Reduce inputs of N-P-K fertilisers Crop rotation Suitable soil preparation Make a cropping map Use sparingly soluble fertilisers and apply sub-surface Fertilizer application after harvesting 33 22 19 15 15 11 11 7 7 7 Many participants recognised the importance of applying organic amendments and retaining crop residues as a means ofimproving productivity. Post-course survey According tothe post-course survey, the awareness ofthe participants had changed significantly compared with the pre-course survey. Most participants have increased awareness about the role of texture, structure, permeability, dispersion, erosion and hard-setting characteristics in determining productive capacity. 1. Which soil properties are important to productivity and need to be appropriately managed? Participants (%) Porosity and permeability Erosion Soil texture Nutrient holding capacity (CEC) Hard-setting Structure and consistence pH Clay dispersion Infiltration rate Physical and chemical characteristics ofsoilSoil surface cover and structural improvement Clay minerals Plant rotation Soil colour 79 66 62 45 38 34 31 31 31 24 21 14 7 7 009/06 VIE Final Report 2009 Attachment2 4 2. After the training course, what are your suggestions to improve soil fertility at your location ? Participants (%) Application of organic matter, green manure, cow dung Lime application Clay application to improve nutrient fixation capacity Soil conservation practices Suitable pH adjustment Improvement ofsoil surface Erosion prevention Planting green manure crops Suitable fertilizer application No-till farming system on wet soil 93 55 52 34 21 21 21 17 10 7 In order to improve soil fertility and crop yields, over 90% of participants suggested applying organic matter such as green manures and/or cow dung tothe soil. Lime and clay application was also suggested by a lot of participants (> 50%). 3. Do you intend to transfer your knowledge on SCAMPto your colleagues and farmers after taking SCAMP training course? Identify requirements tosupport training. Participants (%) Transfer SCAMPto local farmers Organize training courses for farmers Need soil analysis to determine soil fertility Need to identify suitable technology for effective use on local soils Require assistance from Institute and Universities 90 86 10 7 7 According tothe third question ofthe post-course survey, most participants want to transfer awareness and training in SCAMPto their local farmers (90%). 4. How can farmers be encouraged to evaluate soilconstraints and determine suitable methods to improve soil quality? Participants (%) Training courses Introduce successful decisionsupport tools Introduce SCAMP's usefulness as a decisionsupport tool Analysis of local soilconstraintsto interest farmers Combination of training courses Transfer new technologies to farmers step by step Develop a training course program 41 31 24 17 14 10 10 Training courses for farmers were identified as the major method forimprovingsoil management. 009/06 VIE Final Report 2009 Attachment2 5 5. Is it a necessary to have a mobile laboratory which can be moved from village to village to analyse and develop effective management solutions for farmers? Participants (%) A mobile laboratory is a necessity Mobile lab is not a necessity 93 7 The vast majority of participants considered that a mobile lab capable of carrying out on-the-spot analyses forthe key soil characteristics of pH, EC, extractable P and K and organic carbon would be very useful. 6. Student’s suggestion after training course Participants (%) Tutor worked hard Well organised Training course is very useful forextensionists and farmers Should have more training courses Improved knowledge ofsustainablesoil management Extend the length ofthe training course Training course has an important position in identifying and managing soilconstraints Should have more material for farmers 55 34 24 17 17 14 3 3 3 The course was assessed as being very useful, relevant and ofthe right duration. Conclusion The pre- and post-course questionnaires identified some major changes in the perceptions ofextensionists as a result ofthe course. In particular, a better understanding ofthe effects of specific soil properties on constraints resulted in more specific suggestions forsustainable management practices and the recognition that application of fertilisers was not the answer to all soil productivity problems. There was an increased awareness ofthe necessity for soil-specific management based on the inherent constraints identified forthe soil. It was clearly the desire oftheextensioniststo pass on their knowledge to farmers through training courses. The role of a mobile lab to improve the identification ofsoil fertility constraints was seen as a necessity. . 20 09 Attachment 2 1 009/06 VIE: Improving capability of provincial extensionists for assessing soil constraints to sustainable production through the use of the SCAMP decision support system. . on the inherent constraints identified for the soil. It was clearly the desire of the extensionists to pass on their knowledge to farmers through training courses. The role of a mobile lab to. methods to improve soil quality? Participants (% ) Training courses Introduce successful decision support tools Introduce SCAMP& apos;s usefulness as a decision support tool Analysis of local soil