Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 554 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
554
Dung lượng
8,58 MB
Nội dung
The
Harvard
Research
in
International
Law:
Contemporary
Analysis
and
Appraisal
Edited
by
John
P.
Grant
J.
Craig
Barker
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal i 2007
Library
of
Congress
Cataloging-in-Publication
Data
The Harvard
research
in
international
law
:
contemporary
analysis
and
appraisal
/
Edited
by
John
P.
Grant
and
J.
Craig
Barker.
p.
cm.
ISBN
978-0-8377-3038-7
(cloth
:
alk.
paper)
1.
International
law
Codification
History.
2.
International
law
Research
History.
3.
Justice.
Administration
of-Interna-
tional
cooperation-History.
4.
Judicial
assistance-History.
5.
International
law
and
relations-History.
1.
Grant,
John
P.
II.
Barker,
J.
Craig,
1966-I
I.
Title:
Research
in
international
law.
KZ1293.H37
2007
341
dc22
2007024255
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal ii 2007
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
P
reface
v
C
ontributors
ix
Chapter
1.
The
Harvard
Research:
Genesis
to
Exodus
and
Beyond
John
P.
Grant
and
J.
Craig
Barker
I
Chapter
2.
Nationality
R
uth
D
onner
41
Chapter
3.
Responsibility
of
States
for
Injuries
to
Foreigners
James
Crawford
and
Tom
Grant
77
Chapter
4.
Territorial
Waters
John
P
.
G
rant
127
Chapter
5.
Diplomatic
Privileges
and Immunities
E
ileen D
enza
155
Chapter
6.
The
Legal
Position
and
Functions
of
Consuls
J. C
raig
B
arker
179
Chapter
7.
Competence
of
Courts
in
Regard
to
Foreign
States
H
azel
F
ox
203
Chapter
8.
Piracy
A
lfred
P.
R
ubin
229
Chapter
9.
Extradition
G
eoff
G
ilbert
247
Chapter
10.
Jurisdiction
with
Respect
to
Crime:
Universal
Jurisdiction
and
the
Harvard
Research
M ichael
P
.
Scharf
275
Chapter
11.
Law
of
Treaties
A
nthony
A
ust
307
Chapter
12.
Judicial
Assistance
Jerem
y
T
hom
as
337
Chapter
13.
Neutrality
Stephen
C
.
N
eff
381
Chapter
14.
Rights
and
Duties of
States
in
Case of
Aggression
Elina
Steinerte
and
Rebecca
M.M.
Wallace
405
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal iii 2007
Harvard
Research
on
International
Law
Appendix
1.
Draft
Convention
on
the
Law
of
Nationality
433
Appendix
2.
Draft
Convention
on
Responsibility
of
States
for
Damage
Done
in
Their
Territory
to
the
Person
or
Property
of
F
oreigners
437
Appendix
3.
Draft Convention
on
Territorial
Waters
441
Appendix
4.
Draft Convention
on
Diplomatic
Privileges
and
Im
m
unities
445
Appendix
5.
Draft Convention
on
the Legal
Position
and
Functions
of
Consuls
453
Appendix
6.
Draft
Convention
on
Competence
of
Courts
in
R
egard to
Foreign
States
463
Appendix
7.
Draft
Convention
on
Piracy
469
Appendix
8.
Draft
Convention
on
Extradition
475
Appendix
9.
Draft Convention
on
Jurisdiction
with
Respect
to
C
rim
e
487
Appendix
10.
Draft Convention
on
the
Law
of
Treaties
493
Appendix
11.
Draft
Convention
on
Judicial
Assistance
503
Appendix
12.
Draft
Convention
on
Rights
and
Duties
of
Neutral
States
in
Naval
and Aerial
War
513
Appendix
13.
Draft
Convention
on
Rights
and
Duties
of
States
in
Case
of
A
ggression
537
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal iv 2007
PREFACE
We
became
acutely
interested
in
the
Harvard
Research
in
Interna-
tional
Law
while
we
were
researching
all
aspects
of
international
law
for
the
second edition
of
the
Encyclopaedic
Dictionary
of
Interna-
tional
Law
in
the
early
2000s.
We
wrote,
in
fact
rewrote
from
the
first
edition,
an
entry
on the
Harvard
Research
and
that
set us
thinking
that, while
we
knew
of
its
existence
and
had
in
our
writings
and
teachings
referred
to
it,
we
were
embarrassingly
ignorant
of
how
such
an
endeavor
came
to
pass,
what
exactly
it
did
(and
how)
and
what
contribution
its
thirteen
projects
made
to
future
thinking
and
practice.
We set
about
an
initial
investigation
and
concluded
that
there was
a
gap
in
the
literature
of
international
law
in
that
no
one
had
attemp-
ted
a
systematic appraisal
of
the
Harvard
Research.
Determined
to
fill
that
void,
we
recruited
experts
in
the
various fields
covered
by
the
Harvard
Research
and
invited
them
to
contribute
an
appraisal
on
their
area
of
expertise.
The
questions
we
proposed
as
guidelines for
our
contributors
were
simple:
on
what
basis
did
the
thirteen Harvard
projects make
their
proposals for
codification
and
what,
if
anything,
has
been
the
continuing impact
of
these
proposals?
Beyond these
two
suggested
questions,
we
merely
indicated
a
page-limit, leaving
every-
thing
else
to
the
contributors-the
result
of
which
is
a
fairly
wide
range
of
approaches.
Along
with
diverse
approaches,
we
expected,
and
received,
a
variety
of
citation
styles,
which
we
have
left
essen-
tially unchanged.
Because
of
the
nature
of
this
collection
and the
linking
references
within
chapters,
we
decided
that
an
index
was
unnecessary.
We
had
no
pre-set
view
as
to
the
answers
to
these
questions-or
indeed
to
the
larger
question
of
the
overall
impact
of
the
Harvard
Research.
Insofar
as
we
thought
about
the
larger
question,
we
assumed
that
the
Research
had
probably
had
some,
but
probably
not
much,
effect
on
future
developments.
We
knew
it
was
cited
in
the
literature,
but often
merely
in
a
footnote
at
the
beginning
of
a
particu-
lar
section
of
a
work indicating
the
general
sources
on
which the
author
was
relying.
We
suspected that
it
was
one
of
these
sources
that
requires
to
be
cited
in
a
list
of
general
authorities,
but
that
it
might
only rarely,
and
in
the
most technical
areas,
be
used
as
an
authority
for
a
particular
proposition.
In
short,
we
thought that
it
might
be
often
cited
but probably
never
carefully
studied.
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal v 2007
Harvard Research
on
International
Law
We
have
arranged
the
contributions
in
the
order
in
which
they
were
originally
published
by
the
American
Society
of
International
Law
in
a
Special
Supplement (for
the
three
draft conventions
in
the
first phase
of
the
Research)
and
Supplements
(for
the
ten
draft
conventions
in
the
other
three
phases)
to
its
prestigious
Journal.
The
first chapter,
written
by us,
attempts
to
place
the
Harvard
Research in
its
historical context
and
in
the
context
of
subsequent
thinking
and
practice
in
the
thirteen
areas
with
which
it
dealt.
As appendices
to
the
book
are
the
texts
of
the
thirteen
draft
conventions
produced
by
the
Harvard
Research,
though not
the
lengthy
and
useful
"Comments"
that accompanied
each draft
convention.
At
the
time
of
the
publication
of
this book,
W.S.
Hein
is
publishing
a
reprint
of
the
entire
Harvard
Research,
including
the
draft
conven-
tions
and
the
"Comments,"
though
not
the
appendices
attached
to
each
Harvard
draft
convention.
All
the
material
is
available
in
the
American
Journal
of
International
Law,
and
electronically
at
HeinOnline,
but
we
are
delighted
that Hein
agreed
with
us
that
a
reprint
was
important
and
timely.
We
are
grateful
to
the
American
Society
of
International Law,
the
copyright-holder,
for
giving
permis-
sion
for
the
reproduction
of
the
Harvard
Research draft
conventions
and
"Comments."
The Society
not
only
published
the
Harvard
Research
phases
when
they
were
completed,
but,
through
its
members,
clearly
played
a
major
role
in
the
work
of
the
Research
itself.
The
purpose
of
all
research
being to
establish
the
need
for further
research,
we
are
committed
to
investigating what happened
to the
Harvard
recognition
project,
which
was
never
published
and
perhaps
never
completed.
Somewhere-in
the
papers
of
Manley
0.
Hudson,
the
Harvard
law
library
or
the papers
of
Edwin
D.
Dickinson
or
Lawrence
Preuss,
the
reporters
appointed
to
the
project-there
must
be
evidence
of
the
project's
fate.
There
are
many
to
thank.
First,
of
course,
are
the
contributors,
who
eagerly
embraced
this
project
from
the
outset,
followed
the
suggested
guidelines
and wrote
analytical
and
perceptive
chapters.
We
thank
Sheila
Jarrett,
Senior
Editor
at
William
S.
Hein &
Co.,
Inc.,
for
her
constant
encouragement,
assistance
and
patience.
We
want
to
place
on
record our
sincere
appreciation
to
three
fine
student
research
assistants
at
Lewis
&
Clark
School
of
Law: the
redoubtable
and
indefatigable Courtney
Watts,
Grant's
research
assistant for
two
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal vi 2007
Preface
vii
years,
who
helped
immeasurably
with the
introductory
chapter;
Tilah
Larson,
who also
worked
on
the
introductory
chapter,
especially
the
section
on
the
International Law Commission;
and
Sarah
Koteen,
who
assisted
Grant
with
the
chapter
on
territorial waters
with
a
masterly
analysis
of
the
Franconia
case.
For
this
project,
three
of
the ablest
members
of
the
Lewis
& Clark Boley
Law Library
were
drafted
into
service,
associate
director
Tami
Gierloff
and
reference
librarians
Wendy
Hitchcock
and
Seneca
Gray.
John
P.
Grant
J.
Craig
Barker
February
2007
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal vii 2007
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal viii 2007
CONTRIBUTORS
Anthony
Aust
retired
in
2002
as
Deputy
Legal
Adviser,
Foreign
and
Commonwealth
Office,
London.
He
is
the
author
of
Modern
Treaty
Law
and
Practice,
Cambridge
University
Press, 2nd
ed.
2007,
Chinese
ed.
2005,
and a
Handbook
of
International
Law,
Cambridge
University
Press,
2005.
He
is
a
consultant
to
governments,
interna-
tional organisations
and
Kendall
Freeman,
the
London
solicitors,
on
international
law;
and
a
visiting
professor
of
law
at
the
London
School
of
Economics,
University
College
London,
and
other
places.
J.
Craig
Barker
is
Professor
of
Law
at
the
Sussex
Law
School,
University
of
Sussex
where
he
teaches
Public International
Law
and
International
Criminal
Law.
He
is
the
author
of
The
Protection
of
Diplomatic
Personnel
(2006) and
is
co-editor
of
the
Encyclopaedic
Dictionary
of
International
Law
(2nd
ed.,
2003)
and
International
Criminal
Law
Deskbook
(2006),
both
with
John
P.
Grant.
James
Crawford
is
Whewell
Professor
of
International
Law
and
Director
of
the
Lauterpacht
Research
Centre
for International
Law,
University
of
Cambridge.
As
a
member
of
the
United
Nations
Interna-
tional
Law Commission
(1992-2001),
he
was
responsible for
the
first
draft
of
the
Statute
for
an
International
Criminal
Court
and
subsequently
was the
ILC Special
Rapporteur
on
State
responsibility.
He has
appeared
in
more than
40
cases before
international courts
and
tribunals,
including
the
International Court
of
Justice
and
the
Interna-
tional
Tribunal for
the
Law
of
the
Sea.
He
is
a
Senior
Counsel
of
the
New
South
Wales
bar
and
a
member
of
Matrix
Chambers,
London.
Eileen Denza
was
formerly
assistant Lecturer
in
Law, Bristol
University
and
a
Legal
Advisor
to
the
Foreign
and
Commonwealth
Office,
and Counsel
to
the
EC
Committee
of
the
House
of
Lords.
She
is
Visiting Professor
of
Law
at
University
College
London
and
author
of
Diplomatic
Law
(2nd
ed.,
1998)
and
The
Intergovernmental
Pillar
of
the
European
Union
(2002).
She
is
currently
preparing
a
third
edi-
tion
of Diplomatic
Law.
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal ix 2007
Harvard Research
on
International
Law
Ruth
Donner
is
former
Adjunct Professor,
and
Acting
Professor,
of
Public International Law,
Faculty
of
Law, University
of
Helsinki,
Finland.
Together
with
articles
and book
reviews
on
public
interna-
tional
law
topics,
her
publications
include:
The
Regulation
of
Na-
tionality
in
International
Law
(1
st
ed.
Helsinki
1983,
2nd
revised
ed.
Transnational
Publishers
N.Y.
1994),
International
Adjudication:
Using
the
International
Court
of
Justice
(Helsinki,
1988)
and
King
Magnus
Eriksson
"s
Law
of
the
Realm.
A
Medieval
Swedish
Code
(Helsinki,
2000,
translator
and
editor).
Lady
Fox
QC
(Hazel)
is
formerly
Director,
of
the
British
Institute
of
International
and
Comparative
Law
and General
Editor
of
the
Interna-
tional
and
Comparative Law
Quarterly.
She
is
a
member
of
the
Institut
de
droit
international,
a
Bencher
of
Lincoln's
Inn,
Hon
Fellow
of
Somerville College,
University
of
Oxford,
a
member
of
the
ILA
Committees
on
State
Immunity,
Diplomatic
Protection, Reparation
for
Victims
of
War
Damage
and
a
Barrister
at
4-5
Grays
Inn
Square,
She
has
published
extensively including
(with
J
L
Simpson)
Interna-
tional
Arbitration:
law
and
procedure
1959;
Editor
International
Law
and
Developing
States
Vol
11988:
vol.
II;
An
Introduction
to
Interna-
tional
Economic
law
1992;
Joint
Development
of
Qffshore
Oil
and
Gas:
A
Model Agreement
for
States
for
Joint
Development
with
Explanatory
Commentary
Vol
L
1989,
vol
.1f,
1990;
Law
of
State
Immunity
2002,
pb
2004.
Geoff
Gilbert
is
Professor
of
Law
in
the
Department
of
Law,
University
of
Essex.
He
was part
of
the
Human
Rights
Centre's
research
programme
on
human rights
in
situations
of
acute
crisis
that
was
carried out
on
behalf
of
DFID.
He
has carried out
human rights
training
on
behalf
of
the
Council
of
Europe
and
UNHCR
in
the
Russian
Federation
(Siberia,
the
Urals and
Kalmykskaya),
Georgia,
Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Croatia,
Macedonia
and
Kosovo.
He
has
advised governments
on
their
laws
in
Central and
Eastern Europe,
the
Balkans
and the
FSU,
and was the
Director
of
the
OSCE
training
programme
on
torture
for
judges
in
Serbia
&
Montenegro.
He
has
acted
as an
expert
consultant
on
refugees
and
terrorism
for
UNHCR.
He
is
Director
of
Studies
for
the
UNHCR
Thematic
Course
on
Refugee Law
and
Human
Rights
for
Adjudicators
He
is
the
Editor
in
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal x 2007
[...]... partner in the international law firm Ashurst, and he is based in London, England He is the author of numerous articles and has a special interest in the history of international law His publications include the Intertwining of Law and Theology inthe Writings of Hugo Grotius inthe Journal of the History of International Law (1999) and History andInternational Law in Asia: A Time for Review in Essays in. .. six HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal xi 2007 HarvardResearch on International Law governments andthe Prosecutor of an International Criminal Tribunal for the work they have done to help inthe prosecution of major war criminals During the first Bush and Clinton administrations, Scharf served inthe Office of the Legal... (1939) HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal 7 2007 HarvardResearch on International Law tise inthe topic under investigation), inthe hope that each draft 52 51 convention would be "of interest" to, or "merit the attention" of, those involved in codifying international law In his 1928 note announcing theHarvard Research, ... 1953) HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal 20 2007 TheHarvard Research: Genesis to Exodus explored: the extent to which theHarvardResearch was cited by scholars in law reviews; the extent to which the authors of the leading texts and treaties on general international law relied on theHarvard Research; the use made and. .. See The Final Act of the Conference for the Codification of International Law, L.N Doc V.Legal 1930.V.7 The Final Act was reprinted in 24 Am J Int'l L 169 (1930) and Rosenne, supra n 34, Vol 3, 840 HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal 5 2007 HarvardResearch on International Law law on nationality, 38 and not the single... and Materials (2001) She is a member of Lincoln's Inn, a non-practising member of the English Bar and a parttime Immigration Judge HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal xiii 2007 HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal xiv 2007 Chapter 1 THE HARVARD. .. statement at the beginning of the text of the each draft convention refers to the disclaimers contained inthe General Introduction 'o General Introduction, 29 Am J.Int'l L (Supp.) 1 at 2-3 and 5-7 (1935) HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal 11 2007 HarvardResearch on International Law gressive Codification of International. .. (1928) The conference to which Hudson referred in fact took place in 1930 2 An excellent overview of theResearchand Hudson's role in it is provided by Kenny, Manley 0 Hudson andtheHarvardResearchinInternational Law 1927-40, 11 Int Lawyer 319 (1977) HeinOnline 1 John P Grant & J Craig Barker, Harv ResearchinInternationalLaw:ContemporaryAnalysisandAppraisal 1 2007 HarvardResearch on International. .. teaches International Law, International Criminal Law, the Law of International Organizations, and a War Crimes Research Lab, which provides research assistance to the Prosecutors of theInternational Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, theInternational Criminal Court, the Extraordinary Chambers inthe Courts of Cambodia, andthe Iraqi High Tribunal on issues pending before... HarvardResearch in InternationalLaw (2008) The text of the draft convention appears below as Appendix 1 62 Ibid., 131 The draft convention and commentary have been reprinted by W.S Hein inthe HarvardResearch in InternationalLaw (2008) The text of the draft convention appears below as Appendix 2 63 Ibid., 241 The draft convention and commentary have been reprinted by W.S Hein inthe HarvardResearch in InternationalLaw . Harv. Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal iv 2007
PREFACE
We
became
acutely
interested
in
the
Harvard
Research
in
Interna-
tional. Harv. Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal xiii 2007
HeinOnline 1 John P. Grant & J. Craig Barker, Harv. Research in International