Thông tin tài liệu
Chris Middup
CM20145
CM20145
Transactions &
Transactions &
Serializability
Serializability
Lecture Plan
Lecture Plan
1. Basic Concepts
2. Data, Information & Knowledge
3. Data Models (The E-R Model)
4. The Relational Algebra
5. Introduction to SQL
6. Further SQL (Joins, RA Equivalences)
7. Database Design
8. Further DB Design – Normalisation
9. Architectures and Implementations
10.Integrity and Security
Lecture Plan
Lecture Plan
11.Ethics and Professional Conduct
12.Legal Issues
13.Transactions
14.Recovery
15.Concurrency Control
16.Storage and File Structure
17.Indexing and Hashing
18.Query Processing & Optimisation
19.XML Databases
20.Revision
A While Ago
A While Ago
…
…
Architectures and Implementations
Introductions to Transactions & Storage
Architecture concerns:
Speed, Cost, Reliability, Maintainability.
Architectural Types:
Centralized, Client/Server, Parallel, Distributed
Integrity and Security
Domain Constraints
Referential Integrity
Foreign Keys, Cascading Actions
Assertions
Triggers
Authorization
Grant, Revoke, Roles, Audit Trails
Now: Transactions, Concurrency & Recovery
Overview
Overview
Transaction Concepts
ACID
Possible States
Schedules
Serializability
Conflict
View
Others
Testing for Serializability
Precedence Graphs
Conflict
View
Introduction to Transactions
Introduction to Transactions
A transaction is a unit of program execution
that accesses and possibly updates various data
items.
A transaction starts with a consistent database.
During transaction execution the database may
be inconsistent.
When the transaction is committed, the
database must be consistent.
Two main issues to deal with:
Failures, e.g. hardware failures and system
crashes.
Concurrency, for simultaneous execution of
multiple transactions.
©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan
Modifications & additions by S Bird, J Bryson
The ACID Test
The ACID Test
To preserve integrity of data, the
database system must ensure:
Atomicity: Either all operations of the
transaction are properly reflected in the
database or none are.
Consistency: Execution of a transaction in
isolation preserves the consistency of the
database.
Isolation: Although multiple transactions
may execute concurrently, each transaction
must be unaware of other concurrently
executing transactions; intermediate
transaction results must be hidden from other
concurrently executed transactions.
Durability: After a transaction completes
successfully, the changes it has made to the
database persist, even if the system fails.
Example: A Fund Transfer
Example: A Fund Transfer
Transfer $50 from account A to B:
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A)
4. read(B)
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B)
Consistency: the sum of A
and B is unchanged by the
execution of the transaction.
Atomicity: if the transaction
fails after step 3 and before
step 6, the system must
ensure that no updates are
reflected in the database, else
an inconsistency will result.
Durability: once the
user notified that the
transaction complete,
the updates to the
database by the
transaction must
persist despite
failures.
Isolation: between
steps 3-6, no other
transaction should
access the partially
updated database, or
it would see an
inconsistent state
(A + B will be less
than it should be).
Transaction States
Transaction States
Active, the initial state; the transaction stays in this
state while it is executing
Partially committed, after the final statement has
been executed.
Committed, after successful completion.
Failed, after the
discovery that normal
execution can no
longer proceed.
Aborted, after the
transaction has been
rolled back and the
database restored to
its state prior to the
start of the
transaction.
Transaction Definition in SQL
Transaction Definition in SQL
Data manipulation languages must
include a construct for specifying
the set of actions that comprise a
transaction.
In SQL, a transaction begins
implicitly.
A transaction can be explicitly
ended by:
Commit work: commits current
transaction and begins a new one.
Rollback work: causes current
transaction to abort.
[...]... sufficient conditions for view serializability can still be used Overview Transaction Concepts ACID Possible States Schedules Serializability Conflict View Others Testing for Serializability Precedence Graphs Conflict View Summary Transaction Concepts ACID Possible States Schedules Serializability Conflict View Others Testing for Serializability Precedence Graphs Conflict View Reading & Exercises Reading Silberschatz... Testing for Serializability Precedence Graphs Conflict View Testing for Serializability Consider some schedule of a set of transactions T1, T2, , Tn Precedence graph: a directed graph where the vertices are transaction names We draw an arc from Ti to Tj if the two transactions conflict, and Ti accessed the data item before Tj We may label the arc by the item that was accessed Example: x y Schedule & Precedence... ACID Possible States Schedules Serializability Conflict View Others Testing for Serializability Precedence Graphs Conflict View Schedules & Concurrency Advantages to Concurrent execution (executing transactions simultaneously): Increased processor and disk utilization; better throughput E.g one transaction uses CPU while another uses disk Reduced average response time Short transactions need not wait behind... control schemes: Mechanisms to achieve isolation Control concurrent transactions interaction to maintain database consistency Schedules: Def: Sequences that indicate the chronological order in which instructions of concurrent transactions are executed A schedule for a set of transactions must consist of all instructions of those transactions Must preserve the order in which the instructions appear... linear order consistent with the partial order of the graph For example, one serializability order for this graph is : T1 → T2 → T4 → T3 → T5 (note there’s another!) Example of an acyclic precedence graph Testing View Serializability The precedence graph test for conflict serializability must be modified to apply to a test for view serializability The problem of checking if a schedule is view serializable... serializable if it is equivalent to a serial schedule Different forms of equivalence lead to different kinds of serializability: conflict and view Recovery is the point of serializability Serialization makes recovery easier, but can slow down throughput Conflict Serializability Instructions li and lj of transactions Ti and Tj respectively, conflict iff there exists some item Q accessed by both li and lj, and... not conflict serializable: T3 read(Q) write(Q) T4 write(Q) Conflict Serializability (3) This concurrent schedule can be transformed into the serial one (where T2 follows T1) by a series of swaps of nonconflicting instructions Therefore it is conflict serializable View Serializability Let S and S´ be two schedules with the same set of transactions S and S´ are view equivalent if the following three conditions... Transaction Concepts ACID Possible States Schedules Serializability Conflict View Others Testing for Serializability Precedence Graphs Conflict View Concurrency & Serializability Goal – to develop concurrency control protocols that will ensure serializability These protocols impose a discipline that avoids nonseralizable schedules A common concurrency control protocol uses locks While one transaction... running concurrent transactions? Recoverable schedule: if a transaction Tj reads a data item previously written by a transaction Ti , the commit operation of Ti appears before the commit operation of Tj A Database must ensure that schedules are recoverable! Serializability Basic Assumption: Each transaction, on its own, preserves database consistency That is, serial execution of transactions preserves... T2 be the transactions defined previously This schedule is not a serial schedule, but it is equivalent to the previous schedule In both this and the sequential schedule, the sum A + B is preserved Concurrency Gone Bad This concurrent schedule does not preserve the value of A + B BAD Overview Transaction Concepts ACID Possible States Schedules Serializability Conflict View Others Testing for Serializability . Chris Middup
CM20145
CM20145
Transactions &
Transactions &
Serializability
Serializability
Lecture Plan
Lecture. Schedules
Serializability
Conflict
View
Others
Testing for Serializability
Precedence Graphs
Conflict
View
Concurrency &
Concurrency &
Serializability
Serializability
Ngày đăng: 22/03/2014, 23:20
Xem thêm: Chris MiddupCM20145 Transactions & Serializability doc