TheHunchbackOfNotre Dame
A gem that has several very visible flaws; yet, with these
flaws, "The
Hunchback ofNotre Dame" shines as the best from the
Disney factory yet.
For, at first, the company name and movie title didn't
quite appear to sit
well together. You don't marry the king of novel Gothic
gloom (Mr. Victor
Hugo) with one ofthe world's most beloved (if not
biggest) animation
companies and expect the usual world population to be at
the reception; but
expect even Mr. Walt Disney to pat himself on the shoulder
blade (or what's
left of it) for allowing a hideous hunchback to be
transformed into a Gene
Kelly-Incredible Hulk combo type of hero.
This "hero" is Quasimodo (Tom Hulce), which by the way
means half-formed.
It's about his distorted education (whoever teaches the
alphabet using
abomination, blasphemy, condemnation, damnation and
eternal damnation ?),
his humiliation (being crowned the king of fools), his
first love and his
big, big heart. It's about how our outward appearances
should not matter
(sounds familiar?). It's about believing in yourself but
not being
self-righteous. And it's about reliving the magic of
Oscar-nominated
"Beauty and the Beast", directed by Kirk Wise and Gary
Trousdale (both,
incidentally, were also responsible for "Hunchback".)
Wise and Trousdale obviously had a vision that didn't
exactly conform to
your usual "and they lived happily ever after" type of
fairy tale. They
employed a lot of artistic license when rewriting the
plot. It was, after
all, a cartoon; but they didn't allow it to become an
excuse to dissolve the
poignancy and tragedy into nothingness. Quasimodo did not
get the girl.
Nobody exactly lived "happily ever after". There was an
amazing amount of
implicit blood and violence. All that with Quasimodo's
unrestrained
outburst near the end and the best animated celluloid
representation of the
kiss contribute to the real emotions that flowed from the
characters.
Talking about being real, the drawings in "Hunchback" were
simply
breathtaking. The two directors and chief artists actually
made their way
to the famed NotreDame cathedral in Paris to experience
first hand the
magnificence and beauty of it. For ten whole days, they
walked through,
looked from, sat on, literally lived and breathed Notre
Dame. The artists
even "swatched" some dirt just to match the colour! The
result was such
artistry that even George Lucas and Steven Spielberg would
have wanted to
call their own. The scenes in the market place, the
panoramic view of the
steps ofNotreDame and beyond all left me gaping in
wonder and sheer
excitement that such representation could be possible
through animation;
it's all thanks to computer animation.
Computer or no computer, animation has certainly come a
long way. From the
days of "101 Dalmatians", "Snow White and the Seven
Dwarves" and
"Cinderella" to "Hunchback" (Disney's 34th full-length
animated feature
film), there have been no lack of originality. Like its
predecessor,
"Hunchback" is definitely original material destined for
the Oscars. Like
the directors functioning as visionaries, the stars that
are being voice
casted work like magic. Tom Hulce takes centre stage as
Quasimodo's voice,
giving it a raw passion and sounding appropriately
un-handsome. A very
plucky, wild and fiery gypsy Esmeralda voiced very
convincingly by Demi
Moore. It is almost a reprisal of her recent role in
"Striptease" as an
exotic dancer (euphemism for stripper) , which censors
here will not take to
kindly. Kevin Kline did justice to the inclusion of the
devistatingly
handsome Captain Phoebus by giving him that wickedly
humorous edge. All the
voice actors gave such a brilliant performance that they
didn't allow the
celluloid to imprison their characters, rather they added
a very human
dimension that made very cartoon pop right out of the
screen.
The animated feature film, though being a highly
collaborative effort
(especially the case with Disney), hangs on three main
factors to work well:
the directors' vision, the voice casting and the drawings
themselves; all of
which we have looked at previous to this. In the case of a
Disney cartoon,
however, the music also features as one ofthe facets of a
Disney gem. What
I would have considered a loss for Disney with the death
of Howard Ashman
has been filled by Stephen Schwartz; this is not to say
that I am dismissing
the Elton John-Tim Rice-Hans Zimmer team responsible for
"The Lion King".
The incredible sensitivities that Ashman had with his
writing was what made
the songs to "Mermaid", "Beauty" and "Aladdin" so rich and
beautiful;
John-Rice-Zimmer's music to "The Lion King" worked well
because it was
supposed to be grandiose and wild. And by roping in
Schwartz for
"Pocahontas", Disney saved the audience the pain of having
the tenderness of
the script and characters shattered by inappropriate lyric
and musical
sensibilities. The same goes for "Hunchback". I can see
the amount of effort
Schwartz took with every little word; even with the
adaptation ofthe canto
Gregorian chants. The echoing of Quasi's wrongly instilled
self-perception by
making his first song lines "I am deformed, I am ugly".
The self-inflicted pun of
being "old and bent" (he's a hunchback) in "Out There".
The partying frenzy
he gets the audience into with "Topsy Turvy". The trio of
gargoyles Victor,
Hugo and Laverne (Murphy Brown's Charles Kimbrough,
Seinfeld's Jason
Alexander and Mary Wickes of "Sister Act") doing a very
Broadway "A Guy Like
You". Emeralda (singing voice provided by Heidi
Mollenhauer) a very
Christian "God Help The Outcasts". And the opening "The
Bells of Notre
Dame" by Clopin (my favourite character in the movie) all
point to
Schwartz's lyrical genius. Two lines that really stuck
were "And it's the
day we do the things that we deplore/ On the other three
hundred and
sixty-four" from "Topsy Turvy". The rhyme and convenience
of "deplore" and
"364" is nothing short of brilliant.
The one song that stands out as the highlight ofthe movie
the brilliant
juxtaposition of Quasi's "Heaven's Light" and Frollo's
"Hellfire". The
contact with Esmeralda sparking off two disparate
reactions from two very
different men; to borrow a phrase from the storyteller,
Clopin (Paul Kandel
doing a splendid and candid job), we all end up wondering
"who is the
monster and who is the man".
At the end ofthe day, "The HunchbackofNotre Dame"
succeeds where most
other Disney movies fail: to be a cartoon not for kids,
but for grown-ups
depicting grown-up problems. "Hunchback" will not gross as
much in terms of
merchandising as "The Lion King" did. It's also a safe bet
to say that kids
will go back home without the usual "boy meets girl, boy
falls in love with
girl, kills dragon that captured girl and they lived
happily ever after"
feeling. Yet, I still applaud their efforts in daring to
try something so
truthful and yet still so enjoyable. It made me laugh, it
made me cry, and
most importantly, it made me think. For a long time to
come, "Hunchback"
will be seen as the movie Disney took all kids (8-80) on a
field trip to
this place called "the real world".
. The Hunchback Of Notre Dame
A gem that has several very visible flaws; yet, with these
flaws, " ;The
Hunchback of Notre Dame& quot; shines as the. wondering
"who is the
monster and who is the man".
At the end of the day, " ;The Hunchback of Notre Dame& quot;
succeeds where most
other Disney movies