Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 15 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
15
Dung lượng
10,37 MB
Nội dung
Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship Faculty & Staff Scholarship 8-31-2020 An alternative method for surface energy estimation of substrates Bilge Nazli Altay Rochester Institute of Technology Paul D Fleming Western Michigan University Alexandra Pekarovicova Western Michigan University Bruce Myers Rochester Institute of Technology Cem Aydemir Marmara University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other Recommended Citation Altay, Bilge Nazli; Fleming, Paul D.; Pekarovicova, Alexandra; Myers, Bruce; Aydemir, Cem; and Karademir, Arif, "An alternative method for surface energy estimation of substrates" (2020) Accessed from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/1003 This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff Scholarship at RIT Scholar Works It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations and other scholarship by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works For more information, please contact ritscholarworks@rit.edu Authors Bilge Nazli Altay, Paul D Fleming, Alexandra Pekarovicova, Bruce Myers, Cem Aydemir, and Arif Karademir This presentation is available at RIT Scholar Works: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/1003 An alternative method for surface energy estimation of substrates Bilge Nazli Altay1,2,3, Paul D Fleming1, Alexandra Pekarovicova1, Bruce Myers3, Cem Aydemir2 and Arif Karademir4 Chemical and Paper Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA Technologies, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey Media Science and Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA Division of Pulp and Paper, Forestry Industry Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, Turkey Printing Surface free energy (SFE) estimation ource: www.thinfilm.no SFE needed in many industries • Paper, printing, ink, coating, adhesives • Printed and flexible electronics • Surface chemistry • Biomaterials • Oil recovery • Medical engineering To understand • • • • • • • wettability, spreading ink consumption solubility surface contamination liquid adsorption absorptivity poor adhesion or bonding Source: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~yzuo/research3-methodology.html Measurement methods Theoretical models Surface tension, Static method Pendant drop method Wilhelmy plate method Ring/Du-Noüy method Spinning drop method Surface tension, Dynamic methods Bubble pressure method Drop volume/weight method Falling curtain (Mach angle) • Fowkes Surface tension, Static method Pendant drop method Wilhelmy plate method Ring/Du-Noüy method Spinning drop method • Owens-Wendt • Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble • van Oss et al Contact angle, Static methods Sessile drop Wilhelmy method Washburn method Spinning drop method Dispersive component Surface tension, Dynamic methods Bubble pressure method Drop volume/weight method Falling curtain (Mach angle) Polar component • Fox • Wu Surface energy = Dispersive + polar • Zisman • Schultz • Good-Girifalco Owens-Wendt method Contact angle (°) • Neumann et al 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 DI water MI Equilibrium - ∆ angle 20 40 Time (sec.) 60 Cont Sessi Wilh Wash Spinn Common test liquids • Water [21-32] • Propylene glycol [24] • Diiodomethane [21-23,25- • Aminoethanol [29] 28,30,31] • Thiodiglycol [22] • Glycerol [29,32] • 2-ethanol amine [32] • Ethylene glycol [22-24,28,29,31] • Hexadecane [32] • Formamide [24,32] • Dimethyl sulfoxide [8] Common practice for SFE • Most use literature surface tension values • Water 72.80 dyne/cm • MI 50.80 dyne/cm • HD 27.50 dyne/cm • Few uses real-time data Contact angle (°) Contact angle 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 DI water MI Owens-Wendt surface energy calculation Equilibrium - ∆ angle 20 40 Time (sec.) 60 DI water angle: 72º MI (methylene iodide) angle: 34º Surface Energy: 44 mN/m Dispersive: 36.89 mN/m Polar: 7.10 mN/m SFE estimation software Krüss FTA200 Alternative method – AMF method Good – Girifalco method !"# = !#& + !"& − 2Φ"# !"& !#& Chan’s equality !"# = !"% + !#% !"% ≤ !"# + !#% - The largest of three interfacial tensions cannot exceed the sum !"# ≤ !"% + !#% of the other two !#% ≤ !"% + !#" Antonow’s rule Advanced Mat Interfaces, 2020, 1901570 • Owens-Wendt method that commonly used in research provides different surface energy values when different test liquids used PET tested with different liquid combinations o DI water o MI (diiodomethane) o HD (hexadecane) • Our method aligns with Antonow’s [36,37] thermodynamic rule AMF method excel estimator AMF method web-estimator http://homepages.wmich.edu/~fleming/AMF/AMF-Surface-Energy.html Thank you! bilgenazli.altay@wmich.edu ... tension, Static method Pendant drop method Wilhelmy plate method Ring/Du-Noüy method Spinning drop method Surface tension, Dynamic methods Bubble pressure method Drop volume/weight method Falling... curtain (Mach angle) • Fowkes Surface tension, Static method Pendant drop method Wilhelmy plate method Ring/Du-Noüy method Spinning drop method • Owens-Wendt • Owens-Wendt-Rabel-Kaelble • van Oss et... Contact angle, Static methods Sessile drop Wilhelmy method Washburn method Spinning drop method Dispersive component Surface tension, Dynamic methods Bubble pressure method Drop volume/weight method