Báo cáo khoa học: Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity in plant cells ppt

MINIREVIEW Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity in plant cells Alejandro Tovar-Me ´ ndez 1 , Jan A. Miernyk 1,2 and Douglas D. Randall 1 1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA; 2 Plant Genetics Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Columbia, USA The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) is subjected to multiple interacting levels of control in plant cells. The first level is subcellular compartmentation. Plant cells are unique in having two distinct, spatially separated forms of the PDC; mitochondrial (mtPDC) and plastidial (plPDC). The mtPDC is the site of carbon entry into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, while the plPDC provides acetyl-CoA and NADH for de novo fatty acid biosynthesis. The second level of regula- tion of PDC activity is the control of gene expression. The genes encoding the subunits of the mt- and plPDCs are expressed following developmental programs, and are additionally subject to physiological and environmental cues. Thirdly, both the mt- and plPDCs are sensitive to product inhibition, and, potentially, to metabolite effectors. Finally, the two different forms of the complex are regulated by distinct organelle-specific mechanisms. Activity of the mtPDC is regulated by reversible phosphorylation catalyzed by intrinsic kinase and phosphatase components. An addi- tional level of sensitivity is provided by metabolite control of the kinase activity. The plPDC is not regulated by reversible phosphorylation. Instead, activity is controlled to a large extent by the physical environment that exists in the plastid stroma. Keywords: complex; chloroplast; enzymology; localization; metabolic regulation; mitochondria; phosphorylation. Introduction The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) is a multien- zyme complex catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetyl-CoA and NADH. The plant PDCs occupy strategic and overlapping positions in plant cata- bolic and anabolic metabolism (Fig. 1). Similar to other PDCs, the plant complexes contain three primary compo- nents: pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1), dihydrolipoyl acetyl- transferase (E2) and dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (E3). In addition, mitochondrial PDC (mtPDC) has two associated regulatory enzymes: pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) and phospho-pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (PDP). Here we briefly describe our current understanding of the regulation of PDC activity in plant cells. Detailed descrip- tions of the plant complexes are provided by more comprehensive reviews [1–3]. Compartmentation of the PDC It is widely believed that eukaryotic cells arose as the result of phagotrophic capture of bacteria and subsequent sym- biotic association. The progenitors of mitochondria are thought to be a-proteobacteria [4], possibly related to contemporary Rickettsia [5]. The plastids that are charac- teristic of plant cells are thought to have been derived from a single common primary symbiotic event with a cyanobac- terium [6]. Subsequently, there was extensive gene migration to the nucleus leaving both mitochondria and plastids as semiautonomous organelles. Most mitochondrial and plas- tidial proteins, including the subunits of the PDC, are encoded within the nuclear genome of land plants, synthes- ized in the cytoplasm and then post-translationally imported into the organelles [3]. In nonplant eukaryotes the PDC is exclusively localized within the mitochondrial matrix, and serves as an entry point for carbon into the Krebs cycle. The regulatory properties of mtPDC have been specialized to minimize activity in an environment where ATP levels are high. Plant cells contain an mtPDC that is closely related to those of animal cells, but additionally contain a plastidial form of the PDC (plPDC, Fig. 1) that is more closely related to the PDC from cyanobacteria [3,7]. In contrast to mtPDC, the regulatory properties of plPDC are specialized to minimize the effects of an environment with high levels of ATP. The physical environment within the chloroplast stroma changes markedly during the light/dark transition, and specialized regulatory mechanisms have evolved for control of plPDC activity in the dark. Mature plastids differentiate from proplastid progenitors to serve specialized functions in different plant organs. Plastid terminology is largely based upon pigmentation, Correspondence to J. A. Miernyk, USDA/ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit, 108 Curtis Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. Fax: + 1 573 884 7850, Tel.: + 1 573 882 8167, E-mail: miernykj@missouri.edu Abbreviations: PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; mtPDC, mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; plPDC, plastidial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; E1, pyruvate dehydro- genase; E2, dihydrolipoyl acetyltransferase; and E3, dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase; PDP, phospho-pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase. (Received 13 September 2002, accepted 29 November 2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 270, 1043–1049 (2003) Ó FEBS 2003 doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03469.x with leucoplasts, etioplasts, chloroplasts and chromoplasts being, respectively, unpigmented, pale yellow, green and red/orange. The chlorophyll-containing green plastids (chloroplasts) are the site of photosynthesis in autotrophic plant cells. Plastids, regardless of pigmentation or degree of differentiation, are the sole site of de novo fatty acid biosynthesis in plant cells [8]. All forms of plastids contain the plPDC, which provides the acetyl-CoA and NADH necessary for fatty acid biosynthesis [9]. Recently it has been discovered that certain animal cell parasites, such as Plasmodium spp., contain a type of nonphotosynthetic plastid termed the apicoplast [10]. Pos- sibly this type of plastid originated from an endosymbiotic event involving a red algal cell. The fragmentary informa- tion available indicates that red algal plPDCs are more closely related to other plPDCs than to any mtPDC [3,7]. There is as yet no sequence information concerning red algal mtPDC or plasmodial PDCs, but when this becomes available it should provide us with additional phylogenetic, evolutionary and regulatory insights. Plastidial PDC Based upon the results of cell-fractionation, it was proposed that developing oilseeds contain a plastidial glycolytic pathway in addition to the classical cytoplasmic glycolysis [11]. It was additionally reported that these same plastids contain a unique form of the PDC [12–14]. The plPDC from developing castor endosperm has the same kinetic mechan- ism as mtPDC, but has distinct catalytic and enzymatic properties. It was later reported that green leaves from pea seedlings also contain both mitochondrial and plastidial forms of the PDC [15]. The occurrence of plPDC was briefly controversial, however all of the subunits have now been cloned [7,16,17] and their plastidial localization verified by in vitro import studies [16,18] and confocal microscopy of GFP-fusion proteins [19]. Similar to bacterial and mtPDC, the activity of plPDC is sensitive to product inhibition by NADH and acetyl-CoA [9,20]. Another property that is shared with bacterial PDCs is that plPDC is not regulated by phosphorylation. Early enzymatic studies of plPDC noted that the pH optimum was significantly more alkaline than that of mtPDC, and that higher Mg 2+ concentrations were necessary for maxi- mal activity [9,12]. When plant leaves are shifted from dark to light there is a rapid alkalinization of the chloroplast stroma along with an increase in the free Mg 2+ concentra- tion [21]. Both of these changes would activate plPDC. De novo synthesis of fatty acids in green organs of plant cells is light-driven and occurs exclusively within the plastids [8]. The plPDC provides acetyl-CoA and NADH for fatty acid biosynthesis [9], so it is essential that PDC activity parallels that of fatty acid biosynthesis. Thus, a unique mechanism for regulating activity of plPDC activity has evolved based Fig. 1. Compartmentalization of metabolism in plant cells. PS l , the light reactions of photosynthesis; PS d , the dark reactions of photosynthesis. 1044 A. Tovar-Me ´ ndez et al.(Eur. J. Biochem. 270) Ó FEBS 2003 upon the physical conditions present in the chloroplast stroma (Fig. 2). It is additionally possible that the activity of plPDC [22] might be sensitive to light:dark changes in the redox state of the chloroplast stroma [23] as are several chloroplast regulatory enzymes [24]. Expression of plPDC Expression of genes encoding the component enzymes of plPDC is responsive to developmental and physiological cues. The level of plE1b mRNA expressed in A. thaliana siliques increased to a peak six to seven days after flowering, then decreased with seed maturity [25]. This pattern of developmental expression is parallel to that of plastidial acetyl-CoA carboxylase, consistent with a role for both enzymes in seed oil synthesis and accumulation [25]. The importance of plPDC in seed oil synthesis has been further supported by results from both digital Northern [26] and microarray [27] analyses of developing A. thaliana seeds. In addition to developing seeds, it has been reported that there were high levels of expression of plE1b [25], plE2 [16], and plE3 [17] in A. thaliana flowers. However, when the b-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene was fused to the A. thaliana plE3 promoter, and this chimera expressed in tobacco plants, high levels of expression were seen in developing seeds and mature pollen grains while low levels were present in young leaves and flowers [19]. This result suggests the previously reported elevated levels of plPDC subunit expression in flowers might instead reflect mRNAs present in the pollen. Mitochondrial PDC Product inhibition As with their mammalian and microbial counterparts, plant PDCs employ a multisite ping-pong kinetic mechanism. The forward reaction is irreversible under physiological condi- tions, but activity is sensitive to product inhibition by NADH and acetyl-CoA. The K i values for NADH (20 l M ) and acetyl-CoA (20 l M ) are within the physiological concentration range [28]. While the results from in vitro studies suggest that NAD + /NADH is the more important regulator, results from analyses using isolated intact mito- chondria suggest that acetyl-CoA/CoA can also have a significant regulatory influence because of the small size of the total CoA pool [29]. Fig. 2. Schematic overview of the regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity in autotrophic plant cells. Distinct regulatory mechanisms control the activity of mtPDC in the light and plPDC in the dark. PS, photosynthesis; PR, the photorespiratory pathway; PDC, the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; P-PDC, the phosphorylated (inactive) form of PDC. Ó FEBS 2003 Regulation of PDC activity in plant cells (Eur. J. Biochem. 270) 1045 Reversible phosphorylation Plant mtPDCs are regulated in part by reversible multisite seryl-phosphorylation of the E1a subunit [1,2,30]. Regula- tory phosphorylation is catalyzed by an intrinsic PDK, and dephosphorylation by an intrinsic PDP. The three phos- phorylation sites of mammalian PDC were initially mapped withthenativebovineE1a [31]. Both the relative positions of the phosphorylated Ser residues and the flanking sequences are conserved in mammalian E1a primary sequences. Stoichiometric phosphorylation of any individ- ual site resulted in total inactivation, but indicated that there were differences in the relative rates of phosphorylation [32]. Examination of plant mtE1a sequences reveals that the Ser residue corresponding to mammalian site 1 is present, and there is a Ser one residue upstream of mammalian site 2 [33,34]. There is, however, no Ser corresponding to mam- malian site 3. Recent results obtained from MS analysis of tryptic peptides from pea seedling mtPDC verified phos- phorylation of sites 1 and 2 (Ser300, Ser306; N. R. David, J. A. Miernyk & D. D. Randall, unpublished results). O 2 -electrode assays of PDC activity in isolated pea seedling mitochondria verified that PDK and PDP are simultaneously active [35], and that steady-state PDC activity reflects this antagonism. In contrast to the response of mammalian PDC, changes in ATP/ADP over a 20-fold range had no effect on phosphorylation state/activity [36]. Furthermore, Ca 2+ had no affect on steady-state PDC activity [37]. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase Although the primary sequences of PDKs closely resemble those of protein His-kinases, PDKs exclusively phosphory- late Ser residues [38,39]. The K m value of pea seedling PDK for Mg-ATP is less than 5 l M ,andtheV max values for PDK are five- to 10-fold higher than those of PDP, implying that an active PDC requires tightly regulated PDK activity [35,40,41]. Inhibition of PDK activity by ADP is competi- tive with respect to ATP but, unlike mammalian PDK, K + does not effect ADP inhibition of the plant enzyme [40]. Pyruvate inhibition of PDK activity is also competitive with respect to ATP [37,40,42]. Pyruvate and ADP are synergistic inhibitors of PDK [42], which might allow the Krebs cycle to operate despite high matrix ATP concentrations. Pea seedling PDK activity is stimulated by 5–40 l M NH 4 + and 10–80 m M K + , but inhibited by 10–100 m M Na + .The NH 4 + decreases the K m for Mg-ATP by about sixfold [41,43]. Stimulation of PDK activity by NH 4 + is additive with stimulation by K + . Mitochondrial concentrations of NH 4 + as high as 3 m M can arise from glycine decarboxylase complex (GDC) activity during photorespiration. Pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase The PDP is a type 2C protein phosphatase, and requires divalent cations for activity [44]. The activity of pea seedling mtPDP was inhibited 40% by 10 m M P i , but was not affected by any of an extensive array of mitochondrial metabolites tested. In contrast to mammalian PDP, plant PDP is not stimulated by polyamines or Ca 2+ ,eitherin vitro [44] or in isolated intact mitochondria [37]. Ca 2+ actually antagonizes the Mg 2+ activation of PDP from pea seedling mitochondria. There are two forms of mammalian PDP; the activity of PDP1 is enhanced by Ca 2+ , while that of PDP2 is not, which resembles the plant enzyme [45]. Results from both in vitro and in vivo studies have established that leaf mtPDC is rapidly phosphorylated in the light, and dephosphorylated in the dark [46,47]. Any conditions that inhibit photorespiration or glycine oxidation decrease the light-dependent phosphorylation. However, the in vivo light-dependent phosphorylation of mtPDC has been observed in leaves of C3 species as well as maize, a C4 plant that does not typically exhibit photorespiration or glycine oxidation. Our model for light-induced inhibition of mtPDC activity includes elevated matrix ATP levels, NH 4 + (which activates PDK) produced by photorespiratory glycine metabolism, and NADH, which inhibits PDC (Fig. 2). In the dark, photorespiration is curtailed and NH 4 + levels drop, and the phosphatase reactivates mtPDC. This mechanism regulates or limits unnecessary carbon oxidation by the Krebs cycle in the leaf during photosyn- thesis. Because pyruvate is an inhibitor of PDK, mtPDC can be in a more active status under light conditions if metabolic conditions cause high pyruvate levels to be present. Evidence to date indicates that only PDK is under regulation. Thus, changes in mtPDC phosphorylation state will most reflect changes in PDK activity. A complex regulatory network The occurrence of multiple sites of regulatory Ser phos- phorylation of PDC E1a, and multiple forms of PDK with distinct specificities, allows tremendous flexibility of meta- bolic control in mammalian cells [45,48]. Such flexibility is necessary to adjust to changes in nutrition, developmental and physiological states, and health. While there is now a considerable body of knowledge concerning the regulatory complex in animal cells, there is very little comparable information about plant cells. It remains a challenge to understand how metabolism can be regulated in a complex eukaryote that has only one [49] or two [50] forms of PDK. Expression of mtPDC There are similarities in expression of mtPDC among dicot plants. In a detailed study of pea (Pisum sativum) seedling development, it was observed that changes in the levels of E1 and E2 proteins and mRNAs were coordinated with changes in mtPDC activity [34]. The highest activities were found in cells or organs that were rapidly expanding or differentiating; etiolated seedlings or the youngest leaves of light-grown plants. Activities decreased in mature leaves and were virtually nonexistent in senescing leaves. A similar pattern was observed in an earlier study of the phosphory- lation state of mtPDC in pea seedlings [51]. As was found with the plPDC subunits, mtPDC is highly expressed in pollen [52,53]. Changes in E3 mRNA, protein and activity did not follow the same pattern [34]. This is not unexpected. In addition to being a component of the PDC, E3 is also associated with the GDC in pea seedlings [54]. The GDC is absent from dark-grown plant organs, but is rapidly synthesized de novo upon transfer of plant organs to the 1046 A. Tovar-Me ´ ndez et al.(Eur. J. Biochem. 270) Ó FEBS 2003 light [55,56]. In contrast to pea, A. thaliana has two mtE3 genes that are expressed at similar levels in stems, flowers and siliques [57]. Expression of the E3 gene, designated mtLPD1, was higher in leaves, and was strongly induced by light, whereas expression of mtLPD2 is higher in roots and is only moderately induced by light. The expression pattern of mtLPD2 resembles that of mtE1 [33,58]. It appears that in A. thaliana mitochondria, mtLPD1 is preferentially associated with the GDC, although it is capable of also associating with all of the a-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes [57]. There have been fewer analyses of mtPDC expression in monocot plants. In maize, the E1 subunits were coordi- nately expressed with the highest mRNA levels found in pollen and roots [53]. There was not a substantial difference in maize E1 expression between dark and light-grown organs. A somewhat different developmental pattern was seen with barley leaves. While there was coordinate expression of the E1 proteins during the early stages of leaf development, E1b reached maximum expression at the end of cell elongation stage then decreased to relatively low levels in mature cells. By contrast, E1a reached the maximum expression level later and remained high in mature leaf cells [59]. In contrast to the single PDK gene present in A. thaliana [49], there are two maize PDKs [50]. A parallel pattern of PDK expression, with ZmPDK1 more highly expressed than ZmPDK2, was seen in most maize organs and tissues. The exception was green maize leaves, where the mRNA levels for both PDKs were similar. The seemingly higher expression of total PDK might be related to the increased concentration of leaf ATP during photosynthesis [50]. In summary, there is evidence for organ- and tissue- specific developmental control of the expression of mtPDC, and expression is responsive to light. The complex is highly expressed in heterotrophic stages of dicot plant develop- ment, but is relatively low in autotrophic cells. Higher expression of mtPDC is correlated with the metabolic and structural changes that accompany membrane expansion and remodeling. In most instances, there is coordinate expression of the E1 and E2 components. The transient accumulation of mRNA preceding changes in protein levels and catalytic activity is consistent with transcriptional regulation. Future prospects Despite the advances made in more than 25 years of study, many aspects of the regulation of PDC activity in plant cells remain enigmatic. Some components of both plastidial and mtPDCs are encoded by small multigene families [3,16,17,33,50,53,57,58,60]. Are there distinct functions for these subunits, as has been found in Ascaris suum [61,62]? As yet there is no evidence for the occurrence of an E3BP in either plastidial or mtPDCs. Is this because this subunit does not exist in plants, or is it simply that it has it not yet been discovered? This is an intriguing question, considering the importance of E3BP under conditions of elevated NADH/ NAD + [63]. In contrast to the dilipoyl forms of E2 ubiquitous in mammalian PDCs, there are additionally monolipoyl forms of mtE2 in plants [60]. This raises obvious questions concerning the nature of the association of PDK and PDP with mtPDC. Although experiments are currently in progress, there is virtually no knowledge about plant PDPs. In the current mammalian regulatory paradigm, specific forms of PDK have specific roles in overall regulation [45,48]. How is it that plants can be adequately responsive with only one or two forms of PDK [49,50]? To date very little is known about the post-transcriptional regulation of PDC gene expression in plants, and prelimi- nary promoter analyses have been conducted only for the E3 genes from A. thaliana [19]. Thus, the increase in our understanding of regulation of PDC activity in plant cells over the past 25 years constitutes a classical example of, ÔOne step forward, two steps back.Õ The next 25 years promise to be interesting times! References 1. Luethy, M.H., Miernyk, J.A., David, N.R. & Randall, D.D. (1996) Plant pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes. In a-Keto Acid Dehydrogenase Complexes (Patel, M.S., Roche, T.E. & Harris, R.A., eds.), pp. 71–92. Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Randall, D.D., Miernyk, J.A., David, N.R., Gemel, J. & Luethy, M.H. (1996) Regulation of leaf mitochondrial pyruvate dehy- drogenase complex activity by reversible phosphorylation. In Protein Phosphorylation in Plants (Shewry, P.R., Halford, N.G. & Hooley, R., eds.), pp. 87–103. Oxford Press, Clarendon, UK. 3. Mooney, B.P., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (2002) The com- plex fate of a-ketoacids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 357–375. 4. Martin, W., Hoffmeister, M., Rotte, C. & Henze, K. (2001) An overview of endosymbiotic models for the origins of eukaryotes, their ATP-producing organelles (mitochondria and hydrogeno- somes), and their heterotrophic lifestyle. Biol. Chem. 382, 1521– 1539. 5. Emelyanov, V.V. (2001) Rickettsiaceae, rickettsia-like endosym- bionts, and the origin of mitochondria. Biosci. Report 21,1–17. 6. Moreira, D. & Philippe, H. (2001) Sure facts and open questions about the origin and evolution of photosynthetic plastids. Res. Microbiol. 152, 771–780. 7. Johnston, M.L., Luethy, M.H., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1997) Cloning and molecular analyses of the Arabidopsis thaliana plastid pyruvate dehydrogenase subunits. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1321, 200–206. 8. Rawsthorne, S. (2002) Carbon flux and fatty acid synthesis in plants. Prog. Lipid Res. 41, 182–196. 9. Camp, P.J. & Randall, D.D. (1985) Purification and characteri- zation of the pea chloroplast pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: a source of acetyl-CoA and NADH for fatty acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 77, 571–577. 10. Wilson, R.J. (2002) Progress with parasite plastids. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 257–274. 11. Dennis, D.T. & Miernyk, J.A. (1982) Compartmentation of non- photosynthetic carbohydrate metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Phy- siol. 33, 27–50. 12. Reid,E.E.,Thompson,P.,Lyttle,C.R.&Dennis,D.T.(1977) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from higher plants mitochon- dria and proplastids. Plant Physiol. 59, 842–848. 13. Thompson,P.,Reid,E.E.,Lyttle,C.R.&Dennis,D.T.(1977) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from higher plants mitochon- dria and proplastids. Kinetics. Plant Physiol. 59, 849–853. 14. Lyttle,C.R.,Thompson,P.,Reed,E.E.&Dennis,D.T.(1977) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from higher plants mitochon- dria and proplastids. Regulation. Plant Physiol. 59, 854–858. 15. Williams, M. & Randall, D.D. (1979) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from chloroplasts of Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiol. 64, 1099–1103. Ó FEBS 2003 Regulation of PDC activity in plant cells (Eur. J. Biochem. 270) 1047 16. Mooney, B.P., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1999) Cloning and characterization of the dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase sub- unit of the plastid pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (E2) from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 120, 443–452. 17. Lutziger, I. & Oliver, D.J. (2000) Molecular evidence of a unique lipoamide dehydrogenase in plastids: analysis of plastidic lipo- amide dehydrogenase from Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 484, 12–16. 18. Johnston, M.L., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (2000) Import, processing, and assembly of the a-andb-subunits of chloroplast pyruvate dehydrogenase. Planta 211, 72–76. 19. Drea, S.C., Mould, R.M., Hibberd, J.M., Gray, J.C. & Kavanagh, T.A. (2001) Tissue-specific and developmental-specific expression of an Arabidopsis thaliana gene encoding the lipoamide dehydro- genase component of the plastid pyruvate dehydrogenase com- plex. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 705–715. 20. Camp, P.J., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1988) Some kinetic and regulatory properties of the pea chloroplast pyruvate dehy- drogenase complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 933, 269–275. 21. Igamberdiev, A.U. & Kleczkowski, L.A. (2001) Implications of adenylate kinase-governed equilibrium of adenylates on contents of free magnesium in plant cells and compartments. Biochem. J. 360, 225–231. 22. Johnston, M.L., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (2000) Use of sulfhydryl-directed inhibitors in vitro to distinguish activities of the mitochondrial and plastidic forms of pyruvate dehydrogenase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 378, 192–193. 23. Savchenko, G., Wiese, C., Neimanis, S., Hedrich, R. & Heber, U. (2000) pH regulation in apoplastic and cytoplasmic cell com- partments of leaves. Planta 211, 246–255. 24. Zhang, N. & Portis, A.R. Jr (1999) Mechanism of light regulation of Rubisco: a specific role for the larger Rubisco activase isoform involving reductive activation by thioredoxin-f. Proc.NatlAcad. Sci. USA 96, 9438–9443. 25. Ke, J., Behal, R.H., Back, S.L., Nikolau, B.J., Wurtele, E.S. & Oliver, D.J. (2000) The role of pyruvate dehydrogenase and acetyl- Coenzyme A synthetase in fatty acid synthesis in developing Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 123, 497–508. 26. White, J.A., Todd, J., Newman, T., Focks, N., Girke, T., de Ilarduya, O.M., Jaworski, J.G., Ohlrogge, J.B. & Benning, C. (2000) A new set of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags from developing seeds. The metabolic pathway from carbohydrates to seed oil. Plant Physiol. 124, 1582–1594. 27. Ruuska,S.A.,Girke,T.,Benning,C.&Ohlrogge,J.B.(2002) Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed filling. Plant Cell 14, 1191–1206. 28. Randall, D.D. & Miernyk, J.A. (1990) The mitochondrial pyru- vate dehydrogenase complex. In Methods in Plant Biochemistry, Vol. 3, Enzymes of Primary Metabolism,(Lea,P.J.,ed.),pp.175– 192. Academic Press, London, UK. 29. Budde, R.J., Fang, T.K., Randall, D.D. & Miernyk, J.A. (1991) Acetyl-Coenzyme A can regulate activity of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in situ. Plant Physiol. 95, 131– 136. 30. Miernyk, J.A., Thelen, J.J. & Randall, D.D. (1998) Reversible phosphorylation as a mechanism for regulating activity of the mitochondrial PDC. In: Plant Mitochondria: from Gene to Function (Gardestro ¨ m, P., Møller, I.M., Glimelius, K. & Glaser, E., eds.), pp. 321–327. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, the Nether- lands. 31. Yeaman, S.J., Hutcheson, E.T., Roche, T.E., Pettit, F.H., Brown, J.R., Reed, L.J., Watson, D.C. & Dixon, G.H. (1978) Sites of phosphorylation on pyruvate dehydrogenase from bovine kidney and heart. Biochemistry 17, 2364–2370. 32. Korotchkina, L.G. & Patel, M.S. (2001) Probing the mechanism of inactivation of human pyruvate dehydrogenase by phos- phorylation of three sites. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 5731–5738. 33. Luethy, M.H., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1995) The mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: nucleotide and deduced amino-acid sequence of a cDNA encoding the Arabi- dopsis thaliana E1a-subunit. Gene 164, 251–254. 34. Luethy, M.H., Gemel, J., Johnston, M.L., Mooney, B.P., Mier- nyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (2001) Developmental expression of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in pea (Pisum sativum) seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 112, 559–566. 35. Budde, R.J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1988) Regulation of the steady state pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity in plant mito- chondria. Reactivation constants. Plant Physiol. 88, 1026–1030. 36. Budde, R.J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1987) Regulation of pea mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity. Inhibi- tion of ATP-dependent inactivation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 258, 600–606. 37. Budde, R.J.A., Fang, T.K. & Randall, D.D. (1988) Regulation of the phosphorylation of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in situ. Effects of respiratory substrates and calcium. Plant Physiol. 88, 1031–1036. 38. Thelen, J.J., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (2000) Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana: a protein histi- dine kinase that phosphorylates serine residues. Biochem. J. 349, 195–201. 39. Tovar-Me ´ ndez,A.,Miernyk,J.A.&Randall,D.D.(2002)Histi- dine mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 2601–2606. 40. Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1987) Some properties of plant mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. In Plant Mitochondria (Moore, A.L. & Beechy, R.B., eds.), pp. 223–226. Plenum Press, N.Y., USA. 41. Shuller, K.A. & Randall, D.D. (1989) Regulation of pea mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: Does photo- respiratory ammonium influence mitochondrial carbon metabo- lism? Plant Physiol. 89, 1207–1212. 42. Shuller, K.A. & Randall, D.D. (1990) Mechanism of pyruvate inhibition of plant pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and syner- gism with ADP. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 278, 211–216. 43. Shuller, K.A., Gemel, J. & Randall, D.D. (1993) Monovalent cation activation of plant pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. Plant Physiol. 102, 139–143. 44. Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1987) Some properties of pea mitochondrial phospho-pyruvate dehydrogenase-phosphatase. Plant Physiol. 83, 306–310. 45. Roche, T.E., Baker, J.C., Yan, X., Hiromasa, Y., Gong, X., Peng, T., Dong, J., Turkan, A. & Kasten, A. (2001) Distinct regulatory properties of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase and phosphatase isoforms. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 70, 33–75. 46. Budde, R.J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1990) Pea leaf mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex is inactivated in vivo in a light- dependent manner. Proc.NatlAcad.Sci.USA87, 673–676. 47. Gemel, J. & Randall, D.D. (1992) Light regulation of leaf mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Plant Physiol. 100, 908–914. 48. Patel, M.S. & Korotchkina, L.G. (2001) Regulation of mamma- lian pyruvate dehydrogenase complex by phosphorylation: com- plexity of multiple phosphorylation sites and kinases. Exp. Mol. Med. 33, 191–197. 49. Thelen, J.J., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1998) Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana (accession, AF039406) (PGR 98–192). Plant Physiol. 118, 1533. 1048 A. Tovar-Me ´ ndez et al.(Eur. J. Biochem. 270) Ó FEBS 2003 50. Thelen, J.J., Muszynski, M.G., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1998) Molecular analysis of two pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases from maize. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26618–26623. 51. Miernyk, J.A., Camp, P.J. & Randall, D.D. (1985) Regulation of plant pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes. Curr. Top. Plant Bio- chem. Physiol. 4, 175–190. 52. Grof, C.P.L., Winning, B.M., Scaysbrook, T.P., Hill, S.A. & Leaver, C.J. (1995) Mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase. Molecular cloning of the E1a subunit and expression analysis. Plant Physiol. 108, 1623–1629. 53. Thelen, J.J., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1999) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase from maize. Plant Physiol. 119, 635–643. 54. Bourguignon, J., Merand, V., Rawsthorne, S., Forest, E. & Douce, R. (1996) Glycine decarboxylase and pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes share the same dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase in pea leaf mitochondria: Evidence from mass spectrometry and primary-structure analysis. Biochem. J. 313, 229–234. 55. Walker, J.L. & Oliver, D.J. (1986) Light-induced increases in the glycine decarboxylase multienzyme complex from pea leaf mitochondria. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 248, 626–638. 56. Bourguignon, J., Macherel, D., Neuburger, M. & Douce, R. (1992) Isolation, characterization, and sequence analysis of a cDNA clone encoding L-protein, the dihydrolipoamide dehydro- genase component of the glycine cleavage system from pea-leaf mitochondria. Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 865–873. 57. Lutziger, I. & Oliver, D.J. (2001) Characterization of two cDNAs encoding mitochondrial lipoamide dehydrogenase from Arabi- dopsis. Plant Physiol. 127, 615–623. 58. Luethy, M.H., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1994) The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the E1b subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1187, 95–98. 59. Thompson, P., Bowsher, C.G. & Tobin, A.K. (1998) Hetero- geneity of mitochondrial protein biogenesis during primary leaf development in barley. Plant Physiol. 118, 1089–1099. 60. Thelen, J.J., Muszynski, M.G., David, N.R., Luethy, M.H., Elthon, T.E., Miernyk, J.A. & Randall, D.D. (1999) The dihy- drolipoamide S-acetyltransferase subunit of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from maize contains a single lipoyl domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21769–21775. 61. Huang, Y.J. & Komuniecki, R. (1997) Cloning and characteri- zation of a putative testis-specific pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunit from the parasitic nematode, Ascaris suum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 90, 391–394. 62. Huang, Y.J., Walker, D., Chen, W., Klingbeil, M. & Komuniecki, R. (1998) Expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase isoforms during the aerobic/anaerobic transition in the develop- ment of the parasitic nematode Ascaris suum: Altered stoichio- metry of phosphorylation/inactivation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 352, 263–270. 63. Klingbeil, M.M., Walker, D.J., Arnette, R., Sidawy, E., Hayton, K., Komuniecki, P.R. & Komuniecki, R. (1996) Identification of a novel dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase-binding protein in the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex of the anaerobic parasitic nematode, Ascaris suum. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5451–5457. Ó FEBS 2003 Regulation of PDC activity in plant cells (Eur. J. Biochem. 270) 1049 . pathway; PDC, the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; P-PDC, the phosphorylated (inactive) form of PDC. Ó FEBS 2003 Regulation of PDC activity in plant cells (Eur Thus, the increase in our understanding of regulation of PDC activity in plant cells over the past 25 years constitutes a classical example of, ÔOne step