1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Synthesis and biological evaluation of sparsomycin analogues

172 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1981 Synthesis and biological evaluation of sparsomycin analogues Scherer Preston Sanders Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5601 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass For more information, please contact libcompass@vcu.edu SYNTHES I S AND B I OLOG I CAL EVALUATION OF SPARSOMYC I N ANALOGUE S by S c h e r e r P r e s t on S an d e r s Duk e B S , C o l lege o f W i l l i am and Mary , 1977 Thes i s subm i t t e d i n part i a l f u l f i l lme n t o f t h e requi reme n t s f o r t h e Degree o f Doc t o r o f Ph i l osophy i n t h e Departme n t o f Pharmaceut i c a l Chem i s t ry at t h e Me d i c a l C o l l e ge o f V i r g i n i a , V i r g i n i a Commonwe a l t h Un i ve rs i t y R i chmond , V i r g i n i a August , 19 ii Th i s t h e s i s b y S c h e r e r P r e s t o n Sanders Duke i s a c ce p t e d i n i t s p r e s e n t form as s a t i s f y i n g t h e t he s i s r e q u i reme n t f o r t h e degree o f D o c t o r o f Ph i l os ophy Date : - TJl ':7 · • · · • • • 1- l J • t• I � • Approve d : � • I • • !� r ! .� �J.) (q.ft [v: /) � · · :r u.l'f �l Cf4r Approved : t I g 8-l ,;2/., 1'1.f1 Ch a i rman , MCV Graduat e Counc i l ; Dean , Schoo l o f Bas i c Sciences iii S ch e re r Pres t on Sanders Duke A l l R i gh t s Re served 1981 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I w i s h to t h an k t h e memb e r s o f my graduate commi t te e f o r overs e e i n g t h i s proj e c t an d e s p e c i a l l y my adv i sor , D r Mar v i n R Boot s , f o r h i s g u i dan ce a n d e n courageme n t t h roughout t h e course o f t h i s res earch a n d t h e preparat ion o f t h i s t h es i s I a l s o appre c i at e t h e h e l p f u l adv i ce o f Dr Grah am W i nd r i dge and h i s generous g i f t of t h e t e r t - but y loxyaz i f orma t e used i n t h i s proj e c t I am grat e f u l t o Dr A l Mun s on , Dr P a a l K l y kken , and Ms Bern i e Kauf fmann for t h e i r i nv a l u ab l e g u i dance and ass i s t ance with t h e ph armaco l o g i c a l a s p e c t s o f t h e proj e c t I g r at e fu l l y acknowle dge t h e f i n anc i a l support provi ded b y A H Rob i n s , In c , the A D W i l l i ams Fund , and the De­ partment of Ph armaceu t i ca l Chemi s t ry , MCV / VCU I t h an k Mrs Gay le H y l t on for t y p i n g t h e man usc r i pt A spec i a l t h anks i s e x t ended t o my paren t s , Mr and Mrs Carl W Sanders , and my b ro t h e r , Car l , f o r t h e i r i n ­ e s t i mab l e e n courageme n t a n d i n t e res t i n m y care e r I espec i a l l y apprec i at e t h e w i se adv i ce g iv e n me by my fat h e r Las t ly , I w i s h t o express my s i nc e re grat i t ude t o my husban d , George , f o r h i s p at i en ce , encouragemen t , and un der­ s t an d i n g It i s t o h i m t h i s work i s de d i cat ed v V I TA vi TABLE OF CONTENTS COPYR I GHT PAGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V I TA - - - - ACKNOWLEDGMENTS - - - - - iii iv - - - v TABLE OF CONTENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vi L I ST O F TABLE S - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xi L I ST OF F I GURES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xii i L I ST OF ABBREV I A T I ONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xiv ABSTRACT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xv I NTRODUCT10N- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I RESEARCH A I M - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 I I I D I SCUS S I ON O F SYNTHES I S - - - - - - - - - - 33 I V D I SCUS S I ON OF PHARMACOLOG I CAL RESULTS - - 57 V CONCLUS I ONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 V I EXPE R I MENT AL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94 A Gen e r a l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94 B Compoun ds S y n t h e s i z e d - - - - - - - - - - - - - 96 , - D i h ydroxy - 5- h y droxyme t h y l - me t h y l p y r im i d i ne (�) - - - - - - - - 96 ( , -D i h y droxy - - me t h y l - 5-py r im i d i n y l ) carbox a l dehyde (1) - 96 Carb e t hoxyme t h y l t r i ph e n y l phosphon i um Brom i d e ( 4a ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97 Carbet hoxyme t h y l en e t r i p h en y l sphorane (i) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 97 ( E ) -Me t h y l - ( , - D i h y droxy - - met h y l - 5pyr im i d i n y l ) prope noa t e (�) - 98 I - - - - - - - vi i Page ( E ) - - ( , - D i h ydroxy- 6-m e t h y l- 5-py­ rIm i d i n y l ) propeno i c Acid ( Q ) - - - - - - - - - 99 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - ( 2- H e p t an y l ) - 3- ( , - d i hy ­ droxy=6-me t h y l - - p y r i m i d i n y l ) - propen am i de ( 19 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 99 Met h y l - Ami n o- -phen y l propanoate H y ­ droch l or i de ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 -Am i no - - phen y l - l - propan o l ( ) - - - - - 101 ( E ) - ( + ) -N- ( 1-H yd roxy- - p he n y l- - propy l ) 3= ( , - dIhy drox y - 6-met h y l - 5- p y r i m i d i n y l ) - propen ami de ( 2 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - Am i n o - - ( - b romopheny l ) propano l ( ) 102 ( E ) - ( + ) -N- [ 1-h y droxy- - ( 4- b romopheny l ) 2=prop y l] - - ( , - d i h ydroxy- 6-me t h y l - py r im i d i n y l ) - 2- propenam i de ( 24 ) - - - - - - D i e t h y l -A c e t am i do- - ( -me t h y l b e n ­ z y l ) ma lo na t e ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 104 -Am i n o - - ( - t o l y l ) pr op i o n i c A c i d ( ) 105 - ( - Ami no- -h ydroxyprop y l ) t o luene ( ) 106 ( E ) - ( + ) -N- [ - H y d roxy - - ( 4-me t h y l ­ ph e n yl ) - - p ropy l ] - 3- ( , 4- d ih y droxy6 - me t h y l - 5- py r i m i d i ny l ) - -propenamide ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107 - M e th oxybe n z y l Brom i de ( ) - - - - - - - - 107 E t h y l - A c e t am i - - carbet hoxy- 3- ( methoxyphen y l ) propanoate ( 30 ) - - - - - - - 108 - Ac e t am i -2- carb e t hoxy - - ( -met hoxy­ pheny l ) p ropan o i c Ac i d ( ) - - - - - - - - 109 E t h y l - A c e t am i - - ( 4-methoxypheny l ) propanoat e ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 - A c e t am i - - ( - me thoxyph e n y l ) prop a n o l ( 3 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 110 - Am in o - - ( 4-methoxyphen y l ) propano l Hydroc h l o r i de ( 34 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 111 vi i i Page ( E ) - ( + ) - N - � - Hy droxy- - ( - methoxy­ ph enyl ) - 2- propy l]- - ( , 4-d i h ydroxy - met h y l-5 - p y r i m i d i n y l ) - - propenam i de ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - ( - Pheny l e t hy l ) - - ( , dlhy droxy - - met h y l - - p y r im i di n y l ) - prope nam i de ( 36 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 112 ( E ) - ( + ) -N- [ - ( - M e t h y l ph e n y l ) - e t hy l]3= ( , - dlh ydroxy- 6-met h y l - - p y r im i ­ d i n y l ) - - p ropen amide ( ) - - - - - - - 1 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - [ - ( - M e t h o xyphen y l ) - e t h y l ] 3=( , - dlh ydroxy- 6-me t h y l - - p y r i m i ­ d i ny l ) - - propenam i de ( 38 ) - - - - - - - 14 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - [ - ( - Bromophen y l ) - e t h y l ] 3= ( , - dlhy droxy - - me t h y l - 5-pyr imi­ d i ny l ) - - propena mide ( 39 ) - - - - - - - - - - 14 3- ( t e r t - But y l oxyc arbon y l am ino ) pro­ p an o i c A c i d ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 115 , , - T r i c h l orophen y l - ( t e r t - But y­ loxyc arbon y l am i n o ) propanoa t e ( ) - 116 ( + ) - N - Ben z y l - - ( t ert -but y l ox y carbo­ ny l am ino ) propanamide ( ) - - - - - - - - - 116 - Ami n o - N - benzy l propan ami de Tr i­ f l uo r o acet at e ( ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 117 ( E ) - ( + ) -N- Ben z y l - - [ - ( , - d i hydroxy 6=me thy l=5- py r im i d i n y l ) - 2- propana­ m i do]propanam i de ( 44 ) - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ( + ) - N - ( - Met h y l benzy l ) - - ( t e r t ­ but yloxyc arbon y l am i n o ) propanam i de ( 5a ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 119 ( � )-( � ) ��_( - M e t h y lbenzy l ) - - [ - ( , d i h y droxy - - me t h y l - - p y r i m i d in y l ) - propenami do]propanami de ( ) - - - - 19 ( + ) - N - ( - M e t hoxybenzy l ) - - ( t e r t ­ but ylox y c arbon y l am i n o ) propanamide ( 47a ) - - - - - - - 121 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - ( - Met hoxyben z y l ) - - [ - ( , 4=d i hydroxy - - me t h y l - - p y r i m i d i n y l ) 121 - propenami do]propanam i d e ( ) ix Page ( + ) -N- ( 4- Bromobenzy l ) - 3- ( t e r t - buty l oxy­ carbon y l am i n o ) propanam i de ( 49a ) - - - - - - - 123 ( E �+ ) -N- ( 4- Bromobe n zy l ) - - [ 3- ( , 4dIhydroxy-6 - me t h y l - 5- py r im i d i n y l -propen am i ] propanam i d e ( 50 ) - - - - - - - - 124 ( + ) - N- ( 3,4 - D i c h l oroben zy l ) - 3- ( t e r t ­ butyloxycarbon y l am i n o ) propa' n am i de ( 1a ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 125 ( E ) - ( + ) - N - ( 3,4- D i c h l orob enzy l ) - 3[ - ( � - d i h y droxy- -met h y l - pyr i m i d in y l ) - -propenam i d o ] pro panam i de ( 52 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 126 � -Pht h a l y l -DL - aspart i c An hydr i de (�) 127 N - Ben z y l -N - P h t h a l y l -DL- aSparag i n e ( 54 ) -= -� N - Ben z y l oxycarbon y l -DL- aspart i c Ac i d ( 60 ) � N-Benzy l oxycarbony l -DL- aspar t i c Anhydr i d e ( ) - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 129 a - Benzy l N- Ben zy l ox y c arbo n y l - DL­ aspar t a t e- ( 62 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - Be n z y l N-Ben zy l oxycarbon y l - DL­ � aspa r t a t e- ( 62 a ) 131 N - ( - Bromob enzy l ) - 3-benzy l oxycarbo n y l ­ ami n o- , - p y rro l i d i n e d i o n e ( 62b ) - - - - - - 132 - - Ben z y l � - Ben z Y l oxycarbon y l -�4 - ( 4-bromo­ b e n zy l ) -DL- asparag i na t e ( ) - - - - - - 3 C �- ( 4-Bromobenzy l ) - 3-benzy l oxycarbo­ n y l am i n o - - hydroxybut anam i d e ( 64 ) - - - - 133 Pharmaco l o g i c a l Mat e r i a l s and Methods - 135 Exper imen t a l An ima l s - - - - - - - - - - - 135 Preparat i o n o f Med i a - - - - - - - - - - - - a A l pha Mod i f i cat ion o f Eag l e ' s M i n imum E s s en t i a l Med i um - - - b Comp l e t e Du l b e c c o ' s Mod i f i e d E a g l e ' s M i n imum E s s en t i a l Med i um - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 135 135 36 39 t r i fu ge d f o r t e n m i nu t e s at 300 X g ( I n te r n at i o n a l CRU- 5000 c e n t r i f uge , Damon , IEC D iv i s ion , Needham , MA ) and resus - p e n de d i n S p i n n e r ' s me d i a The P 8 t umo r l in e was ma i n t a i n e d i n DBA / m a l e m i c e b y s e r i a l i n t rape r i t o n e a l ( i p ) pass age o f ce l l s every seven t o t e n days To h a r v e s t t h e t umo r c e l l s , t h e DBA / m i c e we re s a c r i f i c e d b y cerv i c a l d i s l o c a t i on The pe r i t on e a l ce l l s were co l l e c t e d asept i c a l l y b y i n j e c t i n g and w i t hdraw i n g - mL o f S p i n n e r ' s me d i a f rom t he pe r i t on e a l cav i t y were spun a t 300 X g f o r t e n m i n u t e s The c e l l s The supe r n a t a n t was decan t e d and the ce l l s were resuspended in - mL of Sp i n n e r ' s me d i a t a i n i n g 10% heat - in ac t i v a t e d f e t a l c a l f s e r um The ce l l s were e n ume r a t e d on a Cou l t e r coun t e r a n d t h e c o n c e n t r at i o n o f ce l l s was adj us t e d t o X ce l l s / mL b y d i l u t i on w i t h Sp i n n e r ' s me d i a b I n v i t ro P c e l l s , court e s y o f Dr Do l ph Adams , Departme n t o f P at h o l o gy , Duke Un i v e r s i t y Hosp i t a l , Durh am , N o r t h Caro l i n a , were ma i n t a i n e d i n c u l t u r e f l asks ( cm T f l asks , Cor n i n g , Corn i n g , New Yor k ) i n CDMEM The ce l l s were passaged tw i ce wee k l y b y add i n g an a l i quot o f X c e l l s t o mL o f CDMEM W h e n n e eded f o r t h e pro t e i n s y n t he s i s s t ud i e s , t he cen t r at i o n of ce l l s was adj u s t e d t o X ce l l s / mL b y d i lu t i o n w i t h CDMEM Prepar a t i o n o f Sub s t rat e , Drug , and I nh i b i t o r S o l u t i o n s a Cont ro l Drugs 140 Puromy c i n d ih y droch l o r i de ( NSC- 5 ) was ob t a i ned f r om S i gma Chem i cal Compan y , St Lou i s , MO Sparsomy c i n ( NSC- 9NB ) and A r a- C ( NSC - 8 , ami n o - B -Q- arab i no furanos y l - ( lH ) - py r im i d i none ) were generou s l y obt a i ned f r om t h e Nat i o a l Can c e r I n s t i t ut e , B e t h esda , MD So lut i on s o f t h e s e drugs at the concen t r a t i on s spec i f i ed in the d i scus s i on of t h e p h armaco l o g i c a l resu l t s were prepared us i n g t h e appropr i at e med i a f o r t h e assay Rad i o i s ot op es b - - l odo - - deoxyur i d i ne ( IUdR ) was ob t a i ned f rom New E n g l an d Nuc l ear , Bos ton , MA , and prepared as a s o l u t ion -5 125 of �Ci IUdR i n 20 �L o f X M f l uorodeoxyur i d i n e 75 ( FUdR , S i gma Chem i c a l Compan y , S t Lou i s , MO ) L_ [ Se _ s e l e n ome t h ion i n e was ob t a i ned f rom Amer sh am Corporat ion , A r l i ng t o n H e i gh t s , I L , and was prepared as a s o l u t ion o f �Ci [ 75 Se l - s e l enome t h ion i ne p e r � L o f t h e i n d i c at e d med i a f o r t h e a s s ay b e i n g per f o rmed c A n a l o gues o f Sparsomy c i n Compoun ds , 2 , , , 36 , 37 , , 39 , 48 , a n d 50 -2 M aqueous s t o c k s o l ut i o n s us i n g d i s were prepared as t i l l e d wat e r D i lut i on s were made us i n g med i a to obt a i n t h e concen t rat i o n s requ i red f o r exper i men t at i o n w a s i n so lub l e i n wat e r an d was prepared a s a 10 a l coho l i c s o l u t i o n u s i n g ab so l u t e e t h an o l Compound -2 M D i l u t i o n s were made w i t h med i a t o decrease the p e r c e n t age of a l coho l pr es ent i n t h e c e l l c u l t ure Compoun ds 44 , 46 , and were not so l ub l e in wat e r o r e t h a n o l at the requ i re d c e n t r a- 141 t i on t h ereby p r e c l u d i n g t h e t e s t i ng o f t he s e t h ree compoun ds E xpe r imen t a l Proc edures f o r t h e B i o l o g i c a l A s s ay s a DNA S y n t h e s i s I n h ib i t ion A s s a y (1) T ime Cou r s e Determ i n a t ion CD- m i ce were s a c r i f i c e d b y cerv i c a l d i s locat i o n The l ower h a l f o f t h e i r b o d i e s was washed w i t h 5% et hano l , t h e femurs were d i s s e c t e d , and a l l t h e t i ssue surroun d i n g t he b o n e w a s remove d Both ends ( i f necessary ) of the fe- mur were cut o f f and t h e marrow was f lushed out i n t o a p l a s t i c c en t r i fuge t ub e u s i n g a 5- gauge n e e d l e f i l l ed w i t h a MEM Th e bone mar row susp e n s i o n was cen t r i f uged at 300 X g f o r ten m i nu t e s The supe r n a t e n t was deca n t e d an d t h e c e l l s were resuspended i n o n e mL o f a MEM The ce l l s were coun t e d on a Cou l t er coun t e r and t h e conce n t rat i on o f c e l l s adj u s t e d t o X 10 ce l l s / mL b y d i lut i on w i t h aMEM A f t e r prepa r i n g t h e c e l l s , 200 � L of t he ce l l suspen s i on was added t o each w e l l o f a m i crot i t e r p l a t e ( M i c r o t e s t I I , Fa l co n P l a s t i c s , Oxnard , CA ) I n add i t i o n t o t h e c e l l s , I U dR at a concen t rat i on o f � C i I UdR/ 20 20 � L of -5 M FUdR was added t o each we l l The i n cu� L o f X 10 b a t i o n t ime s were var i e d so t h a t s i x we l l s o f ce l l s were harve s t e d a t e ac h t ime po i nt : , 30 , , 60 , and 120 m i n utes Fo l l ow i n g i n cub at i on , t h e c e l l s were h a rv e s t e d on a T i t e rt ek c e l l h a r v e s t e r wh i l e f lush i n g t h e we l l s w i t h n o r m a l s a l i n e ( M sod i um c h l o r i de) for comp l e t e remo v a l o f t he ce l l s T h e f i l t er paper d i s ks t a i n g t h e I U d R 142 i n co rpor a t e d i n t o DNA w e r e p l aced i n t ubes and r a d i o a s s ay e d on a gamma count e r ( mo d e l 0 or model 300 , Beckman I n s t rumen t s , Fu l l er t on , CA ) (2) Bone Marrow C e l l s Bone marrow ce l l s a t a c o n c e n t r a t ion of X 10 ce l l s / mLaMEM were ob t a i ne d a s out l i n e d i n s e c t ion V I C a ( ) A f t er p r epar i n g t h e c e l l s , 200 � L o f t h e c e l l suspe n s ion was added t o each we l l o f a m i crot i t er p l at e ( M i cr o t e s t I I , Fal P l a s t i c s , Oxn a rd , CA ) I n add i t i o n t o t he c e l l s , � L o f I UdR at a conce n t rat ion of � C i I UdR/ 20 �L of X -5 M FUdR was added t o each wel l The com- pounds t o be t e s t e d were added t o t h e m i c r o t i t e r p l a t e i n � L a l i qu o t s o f - M s o l u t i o n s f o r DNA s y n t he s i s , 20 � L o f 10 we l l s o f ce l l s -2 A s a negat i v e t r o l M A r a C was added t o s i x The f in a l m i c ro t i t e r p l at e cont a i n e d : we l l s o f b o n e mar row c e l l s ( BMC ) a n d we l l s o f each t e s t compoun d we l l s of AraC + BMC + + BMC + 125 125 I BdR I UdR I UdR we l l s of I UdR o n l y T h e c e l l s were i ncub a t e d w i t h t he drugs o n a rocker p l at f orm for t wo hour s A f t er i ncubat i on , t h e ce l l s were harve s t e d on a T i t e r t e k c e l l h a r v e s t er an d r a d i o a s s a y e d as desc r ib e d in s e c t i on I V C a ( ) ( 3) P 8 Ce l l s The a s s ay des c r i bed i n sec t i o n V I C a ( ) was re­ pe a t e d u s in g P 8 ce l l s h arve s t e d f rom DBA / mice w i t h mat u r e d P 8 t umor s a c co r d i n g t o s e c t ion V I C a aMEM 143 was s ub s t i t u t e d f o r S p i n ne r ' s med i a b Prot e i n S y n t h es i s I n h ib i t i on Assay ( 1) T ime Cour s e Det e rmi n a t ion P 8 ce l l s were h arves t e d f rom DBA / mice w i t h mat ured P388 t umo rs a c co r d i n g t o s e c t i o n V I C a The p repared c e l l s were added t o a mi crot i te r p l at e ( M i c rot e s t I I , F a l ­ c o n P l as t i cs , Oxn ar d , CA ) i n a l i quot s o f 0 � L p e r we l l To e a c h we l l was added � C i L- [ Se ] - s e l enome t h i o n i n e i n � L o f S p i n ne r ' s med ia I n cub a t i o n t imes were var i ed so t h at s ix we l l s of c e l l s we re h arve s t e d at each t ime p o i n t : , , , , , , and hour s Fo l l o w i n g t h e a l lo t e d i n cub at ion pe r io d , t h e ce l l s w e r e harves t e d on a T i t er t ek c e l l harve s t e r a n d r a d i oassayed a s descr ib e d i n s e c t ion IV C a ( ) The p ro cedu r e was r e p e a t e d u s i n g b o n e mar row c e l l s ob­ t a i n e d as d e s c r i b e d in s e c t i o n V I C a ( ) I n cuba t i o n t ime s w e r e var i e d so t hat t hree we l l s o f ce l l s were harv e s t e d at each t ime p o i n t : , , 14 , , and 24 hours (2) Bone Marrow Ce l l s The b o n e marrow c e l l s were ob t a i n e d a s d e s c r i b e d in Sect i o n V I C a ( ) , us i n g S p i n n e r ' s med i a i n s t e ad o f a MEM A f t e r add i n g 0 � L o f t he prepared b o n e mar row c e l l s t o each we l l of a m i c ro t i t e r p l at e ( M ic r o t e s t I I , F a l P l ast i c s , Oxnar d , CA ) , each o f t h e t e s t compoun ds was added t o four d i f f er e n t we l l s i n 20 �L a l i quot s I n add i t ion , four we l l s o f t r o l ce l l s were p repared b y a d d i n g � L of Sp i nner ' s me d i a t o e a c h o f four we l l s t a i n i n g bone marrow ce l l s 144 A s a n e gat i v e c o n t r o l f o r prot e i n s y n t h e s i s , 20 �L o f 10 -2 M puromy c i n was added t o f our we l l s o f bone marrow c e l l s The ce l l s were i n cub a t e d on a rocker p l at f orm f o r hours A f t er t h e a l l o t t e d i n cub a t i o n per i od , � L o f � C i L- [ Se ] - s e l e n ome t h ion i n e / � L o f S p i n n e r ' s m e d i a was added t o each of the we l l s The f i n a l m i crot i t e r p l a t e c on t a i n e d : we l l s BMC + [ Se ] - s e l e nomet h ion i n e we l l s o f each t e s t compound i on i n e we l l s o f puromy c i n + BMC + + BMC + [ 75 Se ] - s e l enome t h- [ S e ] - s e l enome t h i o n i n e we l l s o f [ Se ] _ s e l enome t h i on i n e o n l y T h e m i c r o t i t e r p l a t e was i ncub a t e d on a rocker p l a t form for twen t y - f o u r hour s The c e l l s were h a r v e s t ed on a T i t er - t e k c e l l h a r v e s t e r and r a d i o as s a y e d as des c r ib e d i n s ec t i o n VI C a ( ) ( 3) P388 c e l l s The a s s ay d e s c r i b e d i n s e c t i o n V I C b ( ) was r e p e a t e d us i n g P 8 c e l l s harve s t ed f rom DBA / m i c e w i t h matu r e d P 8 t umor s acco r d i n g t o s e c t i o n V I C a (4) P ce l l s The assay d e s c r i b e d i n s ec t i on V I C b ( ) was re­ p e a t e d u s i n g P c e l l s ob t a i ne d f rom the c u l t u r e s descr i b ­ e d i n s e c t ion I V C b me d i a CDMEM wa s used i n s t ea d o f S p i n n e r ' s 145 c Ce l l Grow t h S t u d i e s ( 1) T i me Course D e t e rm i nat i o n P c e l l s ma i n t a i n e d i n c u l ture V I C b ) we re added t o four d i f f er e n t m i c ro t i t e r p l at es , ( Co s t a r , Be l l co , V i n e ­ l an d , New J e r s e y ) i n a l i q u o t s t a i n in g X P c e l l s pe r we l l Each o f t h e t e s t compounds , i n a l i q u o t s o f 20 � L , was added t o four d i f f e r e n t we l l s on each p l a t e , l e av i n g four we l l s o f ce l l s as t r o l s ( 20 � L o f CDMEM was added The i n cubat i o n t ime s for each p l a t e to t h e s e four we l l s ) were v a r i e d t o i n c l ude , 24 , 3 , a n d 48 hours o f i n cubat i o n F o l l ow i n g i n cubat i on , t h e c e l l s were e n ume r a t e d us i n g a h emacytome t e r v i ewe d under a b i nocu l ar l i ght m i c roscope (2) ED 50 C a l cu l a t i on P ce l l s ma i n t a i ned i n c u l t ure ( V I C b ) were added t o e ach we l l o f a m i c r o t i t e r p l a t e ( Co s t a r , Be l l co , V i n e l an d , New J e r s e y ) i n � L a l i q uo t s t a i n i n g approx ima t e l y X 10 c e l l s / mL Each o f t h e t e s t compounds , i n � L a l i quot s , was added t o four d i f f erent we l l s o f c e l l s , l e a v i n g four we l l s o f c e l l s as c o n t ro l s added t o t h e s e f our we l l s ) ( 20 � L o f CDMEM was A f t er i n cubat i n g t h e m i crot i t er p l a t e f o r twe n t y - four hours , t h e c e l l s wer e enume r a t e d u s i n g a hemacy t ome t e r v iewed under a b i no c u l a r l i ght m i cros cope Var i a t i o n s were made i n t h e conce n t rat ion o f t h e t e s t drugs to det e rm i n e t h e ED 50 Stat i s t ical Anal y s i s The l e ve l o f f i de n c e f o r a l l expe r imen t s was s e t at n in e t y - f i ve percen t A one-way a n a l y s i s o f var i an c e 146 ( ANOVA ) w i t h a Dun n et t ' s t - t e s t was u s e d t o compare a c o n t r o l t o m o r e t han one e x p e r i me n t a l group ( 99 ) L i near r e gr e s s ion a n a l y s i s was used t o de t e rm i n e t h e s lopes of c e l l grow t h curves 147 B I B L I OGRAPHY 148 B I BL I OGRAPHY E v an s , R M , " T h e Chem i s t ry of t h e An t ib iot i cs Used in M e d i c i ne " ; Pe rgamo n Press , Lt d : Lon don , 1965 ; p Owen , S P ; D i et z , A ; C am i en e r , G W Ag Chemo t h e r 1962 , 772 A rgoude l i s , A D ; H e r r , R R t h e r , 780 An t im i c rob Ag Ch emo ­ W i l e y , P F ; MacKe l l a r , F A 41 , 1858 J Org Chem 1976 , W i l e y , P F ; MacKe l l e r , F A J Am Chem Soc 70 , 92 , 417 Ot t en h e i j m , H C J ; L i skamp , R M J ; H e l q u i s t , P ; Lauh e r , J W ; Skekhan i , M S J Am Chem Soc 1981 , 103 , 1720 S lecht a , L Th i r y , L Bann i s t e r , E ; Hunt , D ; P i t t i l l o , R F M i c rob io l 1966 , 12 , An t im i c rob Ant i m i c rob Ag Chemo t he r 1965 , J Ge n V i ro l , � , 14 Can J 10 S l echt a , L -I n : " A n t i b i o t i c s : Mechan i s m o f Act i o n " ; Got t l i eb , D ; Sh aw , P D , Ed ; Spr i n ge r-Ve r l ag : New York , 196 ; Vo l I , p 11 Bhuy an , B K ; F r as er , T J 83 , 103 12 Ga l e , E F ; Cun d l i f fe , E ; Rey n o l d s , P E ; R i c hmon d , M H ; War i n g , M J " T h e M o l e cu l ar Bas i s o f An t ib i ot i c Act i on " ; John W i l e y an d Son s : New York , 1972 ; p 13 Le h n i n ge r , A L " B io c h em i s t ry " , n d e d ; Wor t h Pub ­ l is hers , I n c : New York , ; p 9 14 Mont gome r y , R ; Dryer , R ; Conway , T ; Spect or , A " B io chemi s t ry : A C a s e Ori en t e d Approach " ; t h e C V Mosby Co : St Lou i s , 1980 ; P 15 Hammo n d , S M ; Lamb er t , P A " An t ib i o t i c s and A n t i ­ m i crob i a l A c t i on " ; Edward A r n o l d Pub l i s hers L i m i t e d : Gre at Br i t a i n , : p 16 G o l db e r g , I H ; F r i e dman , P A , 499 17 H a s e l korn , R ; Rot hman -De n e s , L B Chem 19 , 42 , 397 Exp Ce l l Res 1974 , Pure Appl Chem , Ann u Rev B io ­ 149 18 Tompk i n s , R K ; S c o l n i ck , E M ; Caskey , C T Nat Acad S c i U S A 1970 , , 702 Proc 19 Fre s no , M ; Carrasco , L ; Vazque z , D c hern , , 5 20 No l an , R D ; Grasmuk , H ; Drews , J 76 , 64 , 69 21 Vazque z , D " Mo l e c u l ar B i o logy , B io c h em i s t ry , an d B i ophy s i cs " ; Spr i n ge r -Ver l ag : Be r l in , 9 ; p 22 Pes t ka , S Co l d Spr i ng Harb o r Symp Quan t B io l 9 , 34 , 23 C un d l i f f e , E ; M cQu i l l e n , K 30 , 24 P e s t k a , S ; Ros en f e l d , H ; Harr i s , R ; H i n t ikka , H J B io l C h ern 72 , , 89 25 Go l dber g , I H ; M i t s u g i , K 72 26 Bagl io n i , C 27 Go l db e r g , I H ; M i t s ug i , K 383 28 Pe s t k a , S 29 G r an t , P G ; St r y ch arz , W A ; J a y ne s , E N ; Coop erman , B io c h em i s t ry 79 , 18 , 149 B.S 30 M on ro , R E ; C e l ma , M L ; Vazque z , D 2 , 356 Nat ure 1969 , 31 Hobden , A ; Cun d l i f fe , E 57 , 170 , 32 Jayaraman , J ; Go l db e r g , I H 1, 418 33 Go l db e rg , I H 79 34 Pes t k a , S 35 I n n an e n , V T ; N i cho l l s , D M Act a 74 , 36 , 2 Eur J B io ­ Eur J B io c h em J M o l B io l 1967 , B i o c h em i s t ry , � , B i o ch i m B i ophys Act a 6 , 642 B i oc h em i s t ry , � , Arch B io c h em B iophys 1970 , 36 , 80 B iochem J B i ochem i s t ry 1968 , C a n c e r Chemot h e r Rep 1974 , , J B i o l Chern 1972 , , 4669 B io ch i m B iophys 150 36 Net h , R ; MQn ro , R ; He l le r , G ; Bat t an e r , E ; V azque z , D Fed Eur B i o ch em Soc Le t t 1970 , £ , 198 37 S ik o r s k i , M M ; C e rn a , J ; Rych l i k , I ; Legoch i , A.B B ioch i m B i ophys A c t a 1977 , , 12 38 M on ro , R E ; S t aehe l i n , T ; C e l ma , M L ; Vazquez , D Co l d Spr i ng Harbor Symp Quan t B i o I 1969 , 34 , 369 39 Vazque z , D ; Bat t an e r , E ; Neth , R ; He l l e r , G ; M n ro , R E C o l d Spr i ng H a rbor Symp Quan t B i o I 1969 , 34 , 369 40 J imenez , A ; Mon ro , R ; Vazque z , D chern Soc Let t 1970 , , 10 41 N a t h an s , D Fed Pro c Fe d Am Soc Exp B i o Proc 964 , , 84 42 Hern e r , A E ; Go l db e r g , I H ; Cohen , L B 1969 , � , 3 43 Yuk ioka , M ; Mor i s awa , S , , 304 44 Bern ab eu , C ; Con de , P ; Vazque z , D ; Bal l e s t a , J P G Eur J B io c h em 1979 , , 45 O t t e nh e i j m , H C J ; L i s kamp , R M J ; T i j h u i s , M W Te t r ah edron Le t t 9 , 46 Ot t e nh e i j m , H C J ; van N i s pen , S P J ; S inn i ge , M J Tet r ah edron Let t 1976 , 1899 47 O t t e n h e i j m , H C J ; L i s kamp , R M J Le t t , 48 C l os e , H P ; McFa r l an e , J R 1964 , , 29 49 Dubo i s , R J ; L i n , C C L ; M i c h e � B L , 64 , 50 Lee , C K ; V i n ce , R 51 L i n , C C L ; Dubo i s , R J 52 V in ce , R ; Browne l l , J ; Lee , C K Res Commun 7 , , 53 I s l e r , ; Gutman n , H ; Mont avon , M ; Rue gg , R ; Ry s e r , H e l v Ch im A c t a , 40 , G ; Ze l l ar , P Fe d Eur B i o ­ B io c h em i s t ry B i och im B i ophys Act a Te t rahedron Cancer Chemot h e r Rep J Med Chern J Ph arm S c i , , 176 J Med C h ern 77 , 20 , 3 B i o ch em B i ophys 151 54 S i l v e r s t e i n , R M ; Bas l er , G C ; Morr i l l , T C " Spect ro­ me t r i c I den t i f i c at i o n of Organ i c Compoun ds" , 3rd ed ; John W i l e y and Sons , I n c : New York , 74 ; pp 186 , 226 55 Be l l eau , B ; M a l ek , G 16 56 B i rk o fe r , L ; E r le nbach , L 57 Anhour y , M L ; A r i ckx , M ; Crooy , P ; DeNeys , R ; E l i ae r s , J ; J Ch ern Soc Perk i n Trans 1974 , 58 B rown , H C ; H e i m , P 59 Yoon , N M ; Pak , C S ; Brown , H C ; K r i sh n amurt hy , S ; S t ocky , T P J Org Chern 97 , 38 , 86 60 A lb e r s o n , N F ; A r c h e r , S , 308 J 61 N y s t rom , R F ; Brown , W C 69 , 54 J Am Chern Soc 194 , 62 Yamamo t o , D M ; Upso n , D A ; L i n n , D K ; Hruby , V J J Am Chern Soc 7 , 99 , 63 Be r l in gue t , L 64 Bodan s zk y , M ; K l ausn e r , Y S ; Ondet t i , M A " Pept i d e S y n t h e s i s " , n d ed ; J o h n W i l e y a n d Son s , I n c : New York , , p 65 Bent l e y , P H ; Gregory , H ; L a i r d , A H ; Mor l e y , J S J Chern Soc 1964 , 30 66 P l es s , J ; Bo i s s o n n a s , R A 46 , 67 K l ausn e r , Y S ; Bodansky , M 68 Tan n en b aum , S W 69 K in g , F E ; K i dd , D A A J Chern Soc 19 , 76 70 K in g , F E ; K i dd , D A A J Chern Soc 1949 , 3 71 Murph y , M J ; S t ubb i n s , J F 69 , 5 72 Bergman n , M ; Zervas , L , 192 73 Bergman n , M ; Zervas , L ; S a l zman n , L Ge s 3 , 66 , 8 J Am Chern Soc 1968 , 90 , Chern Be r , , J Org Ch ern 19 , 38 , Am Chern Soc , Can J Chern , 32 , H e l v Ch im A c t a , Syn t h es i s , 54 J Am Chern Soc 19 , , 54 J Ph arm S c i 80 , Ber D t s c h Chern Ges , Ber Dt sch Chern 152 74 LeQue s n e , W J ; Youn g , G T J Chern Soc , 54 75 LeQue s n e , W J ; Youn g , G T J Chern Soc , 24 76 B r y a n t , P M ; Moor e , R H ; P i m l ot t , P J ; Youn g , G T J Chern Soc 9 , 868 77 Marks , G S ; Neuberger , A J Chern Soc 196 , 78 Berger , A ; Kat c h a l s k i , E , 4084 J Am Chern Soc 19 , 79 Dun n , T B ; Pot t e r , 18 , 587 80 Dawe , C J ; Pot t e r , M 81 Wh i t e , K L ; Sanders , V M ; Kauf fman n , S M ; Ha l let t , P ; Barn e s , D W ; S a i n , L E ; Bradshaw , T S ; Carchman , R A ; Munson , A E Tox i co l Appl Pharmac o l , i n press 82 Norr i n g t o n , F E ; Hyde , R M ; W i l l i ams , S G ; Woot t on , R J Med Chern , 18 , 604 83 F i es e r , L F ; F i es e r , M " Reage n t s f o r Organ i c S y n ­ t h e s i s " , Vo l I ; John W i l e y a n d Sons , I n c : N e w York , 96 , p 70 84 Gordon , A ; Ford , R " The Chem i s t ' s Compan i o n : A Handbook o f Prac t i c a l Dat a , Tech n i ques and Re f e re n c es " , W i l e y I n t e r s c i e n ce : New York , 1972 , p 4 85 Ki rcher , W 86 Brossmer , R ; Z i e g l e r , D 87 P r a ge r , B ; J acobson , P ; Schmidt , P ; S t e rn , D " Be i l s t e i n s Handbuch der Organ i sh enl Chemi e " , 14 E dwards B r o t he r , I n c : An n Arbo r , M i ch i gan , 194 , p 499 88 Bo i t , H G " Be i l s t e in s Handbuch der Organ i s h e n Chemie " , ( ) , Sp r i n ge r - Ve r l a g : New York , , p 7 89 " A l dr i ch Cat a l o g Han dbook o f F i n e Chem i c a l s " , A l d r i c h Chem i c a l Co : M i lwaukee , 1980 , p 66 90 Do r n ow , A ; W inte r , G 91 Bosshard , H R ; Berge r , A 56 , 8 M J Nat Cancer I n s t U S , Am J P a t ho l 19 57 , 3 , L i eb igs Ann Chern 1 , 385 , Chern Ber 1969 , , 7 Chern Ber , 84 , H e l v Ch i m A c t a , 153 92 M a t u s zak , C A ; Mat u s zak , A J 44 , J Chern Educ 196 , B i rch , A ; Jackso n , A ; Shannon , P Perk in Tran s � , 190 J Chern Soc 94 Fuj i i , T ; Ueno , Y ; M i t sukuch i , M 19 , 19 , 74 Chern Ph arrn Bul l Achenback , H ; Kon i g , F Chern Be r 1972 , , 784 96 Yammarnot o , A ; Tsukamo t o , H 196 , , 1 Chern Pharrn Bu l l Mer ch an t , D G ; Kah n , R H ; Murphy , W H " H an dbook o f Ce l l and Or gan Cu l t ure " , Burge s s Pub l i s h i n g Co : Ph i l ade l ph i a , Penn s y l van i a , 1964 , p 15 " Se l e c t e d Methods i n M i she l l , B B ; S h i i g i , S M C e l l u l ar I mmun o logy " , W H Greedman a n d Co ; San Fran c i s co , , p 16 99 Dunne t t , C J Am S t at A s s o c 100 Thomas , C G ; Peppe r , F D ; Owen , 1969 , 170 , 396 5 , 50 , 1096 J Ann Surg 1 Awwa d , H K ; Pot chen , E J ; Ade l s t e i n , S J ; Dea l y , J.B Me t ab C l in E xp 1966 , 15 , 370 102 Awwad , H K , Po t ch e n , E J ; Ade l s t e i n , S J ; Dea l y , J.B M e t ab C l in Exp 1966 , , 626 ...SYNTHES I S AND B I OLOG I CAL EVALUATION OF SPARSOMYC I N ANALOGUE S by S c h e r e r P r e s t on S an d e r s Duk e B S , C o l lege o f W i l l i am and Mary , 1977 Thes i s... a t ion benzy l ox y carbon y l ABSTRACT SYNTHES I S AND B I OLOG I CAL EVALUAT I ON OF SPARSOMYC I N ANALOGUES S c h e r e r P r e s t on Sanders Duke , Ph D Med i c a l Co l l e g e o f V... 50S and 30S f r agme n t s and mamma l i an r ibo somes c l e ave into 60S and S s ubun i t s ( 12 ) The r i bosome s are spec i f i c a l l y des ign e d f o r pro t e in syn t he s i s and

Ngày đăng: 27/10/2022, 18:57

Xem thêm:

w