THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
2016 LOUISIANA TEACHER PREPARATION DATA DASHBOARD University of New Orleans Prepared by Louisiana Board of Regents & University of Louisiana System Public Undergraduate Teacher Preparation Program BASIC PROGRAM INFORMATION http://www.uno.edu/coehd/index.aspx Program Web Site Approval/Accreditation Names of Agencies Type of Program CANDIDATE SELECTION PROFILE Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Skills Assessment (2013-14) Median GPA of Candidates Entering the Program (2013-14) Median GPA of Candidates Completing the Program (2013-14) Number of Candidates who Started but Did not Complete the Program Within Years Academic Strength Teaching Promise Candidates/ Completer Diversity Knowledge Status State: Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) State: Board of Regents (BoR) Regional: Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC) National: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE); Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC); or Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) Traditional (Undergraduate) Data not yet available Candidates (2013-14) Enrolled Gender Hispanic Enrolled Race Content Pedagogical Overall Clinical Experiences Enrolled Completers 141 68 Approved Approved Accredited Accredited 100% 3.10 3.30 Data Not Yet Available Total 209 Males Females 28 113 Indian Asian Black Islander White Multi-Racial 14 104 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR TEACHING OF COMPLETERS Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Content Assessments (2013-14) Completer Passage Rate on Praxis Professional Knowledge Assessments (2013-14) Completer Passage Rate on all Assessments (2013-14) Student Clock Hours of Clinical Experiences Prior to Student Teaching Number of Number of Teaching Clock Hours of Clinical Experiences Weeks Clock Hours per During Student Teaching 100% 100% 100% 180 Total Number of Clock Hours Week Licensure Requirements Completer Rating Entry and Persistence in Teaching in Public Schools in Louisiana (Please examine the 2016 Louisiana Teacher Preparation Data Fact Book to accurately interpret the meaning of these scores.) Placement/Persistence in High-Need Subjects/Schools 15 Number and Percentage of 2013-14 Completers That Meet State Licensing Requirements Data Not Yet Available 35 PROGRAM PRODUCTIVITY AND ALIGNMENT TO STATE NEEDS OF COMPLETERS Percentage & Number of 2013-14 Completers That Were Teaching in 2014-15 Percentage & Number of 2013-14 Completers That Obtained a License to Teach 525 100% 75% (n=51) Data Not Yet Available 2009-10 Completers Teaching in Public Schools in Louisiana in 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, & 2014-15 Number of Number & Number & Number & Number & Number & 2009-10 Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Completers Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in Teaching in 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 100% (n=45) 47% (n=21) 47% (n=21) 44% (n=20) 49% (n=22) 49% (n=22) Data Not Yet available Assistance in the design of the Louisiana Teacher Preparation Dashboard was provided by the 2020 Key Effectiveness Indicators developed by Michael Allen, Edward Crowe, and Charles Coble, co-partners of Teacher Preparation Analytics 2016 LOUISIANA TEACHER PREPARATION DATA DASHBOARD (CONT’D) University of New Orleans Prepared by Louisiana Board of Regents & University of Louisiana System Public Undergraduate Teacher Preparation Program PERFORMANCE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS (NEW TEACHERS WITH LESS THAN TWO YEARS OF TEACHING) Compass Student Growth Mean & Number of Scores Impact on Mean Compass Student Growth K-12 Students Score (2012-13, 2013-14, & 201415) and Number of Scores for All 3.0 (n=203) (Please examine the 2016 New Teachers with Less than Two Louisiana Teacher Preparation Years of Teaching Data Fact Book to accurately Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Student Growth Scores Percentage and Number of 2012interpret the meaning of these Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 13, 2013-14, & 2014-15 Compass scores.) Student Growth Scores for the New 3% 16% 40% 40% Teachers by LDOE Teacher Effectiveness Levels Compass Professional Practice Mean & Number of Scores Demonstrated Teaching Mean Compass Professional Skill Practice Score (2012-13, 2013-14, & 2014-15) and Number of Scores 3.0 (n=203) (Please examine the 2016 for All New Teachers with Less than Louisiana Teacher Preparation Two Years of Teaching Data Fact Book to accurately Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Professional Practice Scores Percentage and Number of 2012interpret the meaning of these Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective scores.) 13, 2013-14, & 2014-15 Compass 1% 14% 74% 12% Professional Practice Scores for the New Teachers by LDOE Teacher Effectiveness Levels Compass Final Evaluation Mean & Number of Scores Overall Impact and Mean Compass Final Evaluation Demonstrated Teaching Score (2012-13, 2013-14, & 2014Skill 15) and Number of Scores for New 2.9 (n=203) Teachers with Less than Two Years (Please examine the 2016 of Teaching Louisiana Teacher Preparation Compass Teacher Effectiveness Levels for Final Evaluation Scores Percentage and Number of 2012Data Fact Book to accurately Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 13, 2013-14, & 2014-15 Compass interpret the meaning of these 3% 11% 74% 12% scores.) Final Evaluation Scores for the New Teachers by LDOE Teacher Effectiveness Levels Mean, Number of Scores, & Effectiveness Levels for Value-Added Scores of State Value Added Scores Content Areas Twenty-five or More New Teachers with Less Than Two Years of Teaching who for Growth in Student Taught During 2014-15 (3- to 5-Year Averages) Learning for New Mathematics Teachers in Grades 4-8 (Note: A Mean score could not be N/A (n=27) with Less than Two Years determined this year to calculate 3- to 5year averages due to differences in cut-off of Teaching by Content Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective scores for new assessments Percentages of Areas (Twenty-five or 11% 41% 26% 22% individual scores within effectiveness levels More New Teachers) could be determined.) (Please examine the 2016 Louisiana Teacher Preparation Data Fact Book to accurately interpret the meaning of these scores.) Science 2.0 (n=27) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 4% 44% 26% 26% Social Studies -0.2 (n=25) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 8% 40% 36% 16% English/Language Arts/Reading (Note: A Mean score could not be determined this year to calculate 3- to 5year averages due to differences in cut-off scores for new assessments Percentages of individual scores within effectiveness levels could be determined.) N/A (n=31) Ineffective Effective Emerging Effective Proficient Highly Effective 3% 42% 39% 16%
Ngày đăng: 26/10/2022, 09:58
Xem thêm: