WHO/SDE/02.11 Englishonly Combinedhouseholdwatertreatmentandindoorair pollutionprojectsinurbanMambanda,Cameroonandrural Nyanza,Kenya Geneva2011 1 1 Photocredit(BruceNandShaheedA,2009) Combinedhouseholdwatertreatmentandindoorairpollutionprojectsinurban Mambanda,CameroonandruralNyanza,Kenya ©WorldHealthOrganization2011 Allrightsreserved.PublicationsoftheWorldHealthOrganizationcanbeobtainedfrom WHOPress,WorldHealthOrganization,20 AvenueAppia,1211Geneva27,Switzerland(tel.: +41227913264;fax:+41227914857;e‐mail:bookorders@who.int ).Requestsfor permissiontoreproduceortranslateWHOpublications–whetherforsaleorfor noncommercialdistribution–shouldbeaddressedtoWHOPress,attheaboveaddress(fax: +41227914806;e‐mail:permissions@who.int). Thedesignationsemployedandthepresentationofthematerialinthispublicationdo not implytheexpressionofanyopinionwhatsoeveronthepartoftheWorldHealth Organizationconcerningthelegalstatusofanycountry,territory,cityorareaorofits authorities,orconcerningthedelimitationofitsfrontiersorboundaries.Dottedlineson mapsrepresentapproximateborderlinesforwhichthere maynotyetbefullagreement. Thementionofspecificcompaniesorofcertainmanufacturers’productsdoesnotimplythat theyareendorsedorrecommendedbytheWorldHealthOrganizationinpreferenceto othersofasimilarnaturethatarenotmentioned.Errorsandomissionsexcepted,thenames ofproprietary productsaredistinguishedbyinitialcapitalletters. AllreasonableprecautionshavebeentakenbytheWorldHealthOrganizationtoverifythe informationcontainedinthispublication.However,thepublishedmaterialisbeing distributedwithoutwarrantyofanykind,eitherexpressedorimplied.Theresponsibilityfor theinterpretationanduseof themateriallieswiththereader.InnoeventshalltheWorld HealthOrganizationbeliable fordamagesarisingfromitsuse. 2 2 WHO/SDE/WSH/02.11 Englishonly Combinedhouseholdwatertreatmentandindoorair pollutionprojectsinurbanMambanda,Cameroonandrural Nyanza,Kenya ReportofamissiontoMambanda,CameroonandNyanza,Kenya Carriedoutfrom10to18December 2009 Authors AmeerShaheed Consultant,Water,SanitationandHealthProgramme,WorldHealthOrganization,Geneva NigelBruce Consultant,InterventionsforHealthyEnvironments,WorldHealthOrganization,Geneva Editor MaggieMontgomery TechnicalOfficer,Water,SanitationandHealthProgramme,WorldHealthOrganization, Geneva Acknowledgements Theauthorsthanktheprojectofficersandhealthpromoters, governmentofficials,small‐ scalebusinesspeopleandhouseholdrespondentsinCameroonandKenyawhoofferedtheir timeandexpertisetoinformthisevaluation.Inaddition,appreciationisextendedtoall thosestakeholderswhohelpedinitiatethesehouseholdenvironmentalhealthintegration projectsandcontinuetocarryoutthisimportantwork. 3 3 TABLEOFCONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY 6 1.BackgroundtoRFP 6 2.EvaluationTermsofReference(ToR)andmethods 6 3.CountryReports 7 4.Overallstrategicissuesandrecommendations 16 5.Nextsteps 17 1.INTRODUCTION 20 1.1Projectoverview 20 1.2EvaluationTermsofReference 20 1.3Visitschedule 21 1.4Evaluationmethods 21 1.5Briefreviewofliterature 21 1.5.1Effectivenessof HWTS 21 1.5.2Effectivenessofimprovedsolidfuelstoves 22 2.COUNTRYREPORT–URBANMAMBANDA,CAMEROON 24 2.1Countrybackground 24 2.2Projectorganizationandmanagement 24 2.3Educationandproductpromotion 27 2.4Interventionefficacy,effectivenessandefficiency 28 2.4.1Householdwatertreatment 28 2.4.2Impr ovedstoves:reductionofhouseholdsolidfuelairpollution 32 2.5Financeand loanarrangements 35 2.6Addedvalueofintegrateddelivery:synergies 35 2.7Recommendedareasforfurtherresearch 37 2.8Scaling‐up 38 2.8.1Locallevel 38 2.8.2Largerscale(city–national) 39 2.9Discussionandconclusions 40 2.9.1Conclusions 40 2.9.2Data 43 2.9.3Finalcomments 44 3.COUNTRYREPORT–RURALNYANZA,KENYA 45 3.1Countrybackground 45 3.2Project overview 46 3.3.Projectorganisationandmanagement 48 3.4Education(health),productpromotionandfinance(loans) 49 3.5Interventionefficacy,effectivenessandefficiency 52 3.5.1Householdwatertreatment 52 3.5.2Impr ovedstoves:reductionofhouseholdsolidfuelairpollution 55 3.7Evaluationresearch 62 3.8Scaling‐upandintegrationwithgovernment 63 3.9Discussionandconclusions 65 4.SYNTHESISOF EXPERIENCEFROMCAMEROONANDKENYA 68 4.1Projectfundingandorganisation 68 4 4 4.2Products 68 4.3Educationandpromotion 69 4.4Sellingofproducts 69 4.5Sustainabilityandscalingup,exitstrategy 70 4.6Synergy 70 4.7Researchandevaluation 70 5.RECOMMENDATIONANDNEXTSTEPS 71 5.1Specificrecommendationsforcountries 71 5.1.1Cameroon 71 5.1.2Kenya 72 5.2Strategicrecommendations 73 5.3Follow‐upWorkshop 74 5.4Issuesforfurtherresearch 74 5.5 Futureimplementation 75 6.REFERENCES 76 ANNEX1Visitschedule(December2009) 78 ANNEX2Evaluationtopics/questions 79 5 5 ABBREVIATIONS ACMS AssociationCamerounaisedeMarketingsociale(SocialMarketing AssociationofCameroon) ALRI AcuteLowerRespiratoryInfection AQG AirQualityGuidelines GTZ GesellschaftfürtechnischeZ usammenarbeitung(GermanTechnical Cooperation) HAP HouseholdAirPollution HHE HouseholdEnergy HWT Householdwatertreatment HWTS Ho useholdwatertreatmentandsafestorage IAQ IndoorAirQuality ITN Insecticidetreatednets LP Liquefiedpetroleum JMP WHO/UNICEFJointMonitoringProgram MMS MambandaMultiStove(Cameroon) NGO Non‐governmentalOrganization NICHE NyandoIntegratedChildHealthandEducationProject PCIA PartnershipforCleanIndoorAir PSI PopulationServicesInternational RFP Requestforproposals SWAP SafeWaterandAIDSProject(KenyanNGO) SWAp Sector‐wideapproach(KenyanGovernment) UNICEF UnitedNationsChildren’sFund WG WaterGuard®(“Sur’Eau”inFrench) WHO WorldHealthOrganization 6 EXECUTIVESUMMARY 1.BackgroundtoRFP In2007,theWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)issuedarequestforproposals(RFP)onthe integrationofIndoorAirQuality(IAQ)andHouseholdWaterTreatment(HWT)atthe householdlevelinAfrica.Globally,theburdenofill‐healthinAfricaduetounsafedrinking‐ water,inadequatesanitationandpollutedindoorair standsoutprominently.AmongAfrican childrenunder5yearsofage,18%ofalldeathsareduetodiarrhoea,and17%topneumonia (UNICEF/WHO,2009).Around40%ofthesepneumoniadeathscanbeattributedtoindoor airpollution,andapproximately88%ofdiarrhoeadeathstoinadequatewater,sanitation, andhygiene (WHO,2007). Theaimsofthisinitiativewere: 1. Toexplorewhetherornotitispossibletoachievesynergiesandeconomiesofscaleby linkingHWTandIAQinterventions 2. Toexaminethepotentialforexpansionandscalingupintheimplementationofprojects combiningtheseinterventions 3. To documentintegrationmodelsfortheseinterventions 4. Toexaminetheadded‐valueofintegratingthesetwoapproaches,inawaythat contributestoanimprovementinhealthoutcomes,aswellassustainabilityandadoption ofuse. Followingappraisaloftheproposalsreceived,twoprojectswereselected,oneinurban Douala, Cameroon,thesecondinruralNyanza,Kenya.Abriefoverviewofeachprojectis providedinthecountryreportsectionsinthemainreport. 2.EvaluationTermsofReference(ToR)andmethods WHOprojectsupportintheoverallmanagementplanmadeprovisionsforanevaluationvisit toeachcountry.ThesewerecarriedoutinDecember2009bytwoWHOConsultants,Mr AmeerShaheed(CameroonandKenya)andDrNigelBruce(Kenya),withthefollowingToR: 1. Preparebackgroundinformationandcompilecontextualinformation ontheareas/study communitieswithrespecttowatersupply/quality,householdfueltypeandsupply/IAQ (subjecttoavailability)andrelatedhealthdata(diarrhoea,acutelowerrespiratory infection(ALRI)) 2. Toconductafield‐visittothetwoprojectsinCameroonandKenya,andperformabasic evaluation 3. Prepareacomprehensive factualaccountofprojectactivitiesandoutputs,describingthe experienceofresidents,projectstaffandotherrelevantkeyinformants(e.g.local government,partnerorganizations)concerningprojectdelivery,achievements,problems andissues,andconcerningfutureprospectsforthiscombinedenvironmentalhealth approachtargetedathouseholds.Particularemphasisshouldbegiventoassessing the addedvalueoflinkingdrinking‐watersafetyandindoorairquality. 7 Themethodsusedfortheevaluationdrewontechniquesofrapidappraisal,involving(i) reviewofDocumentation(allavailableprojectdocumentation,countrystatisticaldata, relevantpublishedpapersandreports;(ii)Interviewswithkeyinformants(projectstaff, residents/usersoftheproductsandservices,andotherstakeholders),and(iii)Observation (projectmanagementand procedures,households,photographs).Interviewswererecorded bymanualnote‐taking,andres ponsessynthesizedusingasimpleformofframework analysis.ThebackgroundpaperintheRFPbyClasenandBiran (2007)whichproposed criteriaonpotentialsynergiesandantagonisms,alsocontributedtostructuringthe evaluation. 3.CountryReports CAMEROON Localsituation Cameroonisacountryof18.2millionpeople.Meanlifeexpectancyatbirthis50/52years (m/f),andunder‐5mortalityis149/1000livebirths.Diarrhoeaaccountsfor16.4%ofunder‐5 deaths,andpneumonia,for20.4% (WHO,2009).Accordingto2008figures,anestimated 92%ofurbanCameroonhasaccesstoan"improved"drinking‐watersourceasdefinedbythe WHO/UNICEFJointMonitoringProgramme(WHO/UNICEF,2010).This doesnotg uarantee safewaterhowever,andalargeproportionofsuchsourcesmaybesubjecttocontamination , especiallythroughunsafewaterhandlingandstorage practices.Additionally,56%ofurban areaslackaccessto“improved”sanitation(WHO/UNICEF,2010).Regardingurbanfueluse, approximately52%consistsofwoodandsawdust,25%ofLPGgas,5%ofcharcoal,and13% ofkerosene(WHO,2010). TheprojectwasspearheadedbytheGermanTechnicalCooperation(GTZ)inCameroon,in Mambanda,asemi‐formalsettlementinDouala,Cameroon'slargestcity.Situatedonan island,accesstowaterislimited,andgroundwaterisbrackish,containingheavyiron deposits.Furthermore,thepoorsystemofpipelinesandmanagementoftreatmentplants resultsincontaminated,unsavoury,andinsufficientdrinking‐water.Fueluseconsisted primarilyof woodandsawdust,andtoalesserextent,charcoalandLPgas. Projectactivityandachievements Projectobjectives Theprojectpilotedamethodofintegratingthedeliveryofawatertreatmentdevicewith improvedstoves.Itwassetuptoinvestigatethepotentialaddedvalueofcombining environmentalhealthinterventions. Itshealthaimswere“toreducechildmorbidityand mortalityfromdiarrhoealandrespiratorydiseases” (GTZ,2008).GTZalsosawthisasan opportunitytofollowfromtheirearlieractivitiesinwater,sanitation,andhygienein Mambanda. Projectfunctioning Theprojectwascoined“SmokeandDrinking‐water”,whichsawthejointimplementationof awatertreatmentproduct“WaterGuard®”(WG)andanimprovedstove“Mambanda MultiStove” ineightblocksofthesettlement.WGisasodiumhypochloritesolutionusedfor disinfectingdrinking‐wateratthepoint‐of‐use,popularinmanyAfricanandAsiancountries andemergency‐reliefoperations.TheMambandaMultiStove(MMS)isauniqueimproved stove,designedbyGTZ,aimingtoreduceindoor‐air‐pollution andefficientlycombust 8 multipletypesoffuel.TheprojectwassettorunfromJune2008toNovember2009.Itwasin successiontoGTZ’searlier“WaterandSanitation”project(2006‐2008),inthecontextof whichwell‐chlorinationandsanitationinterventionswereconductedinseveralpartsof Douala,includingMambanda. Projectstructure TheGTZenvironmenthealthofficerinDoualawastheoverallprojectcoordinator.He employedtwoprojectmanagers,whowereinchargeofallfieldactivities.TheAssociation CamerounaisepourleMarketingSocial(ACMS),anot‐for‐profitorganisation,providedWG andsocialmarketingexpertisetotheproject.Localweldersweretrained byGTZtoproduce theMMS.Theprojectteamincludedfourlocalg roups:(1)watervendors,whosoldwaterat communalpumpsalongwithbothinterventionproducts;(2)localshopkeeperswhosold WG;(3)communityworkerswhoengagedwiththebeneficiariesandsoldbothproducts;and (4)localhealthcentre staff. Expectedoutputs Ofthetargetpopulation,90%wasexpectedtohaveaccesstosafedrinking‐waterand60%to beusingfuelefficientstovesbytheendoftheproject.Theintegratedapproachwas expectedtobringoverallefficiency,particularlyincostandtime.Theyexpected improvementsincommunity healtheducation,andgreaterownershipoftheproject amongstbeneficiaries. Evaluationresults Itisimportanttonotethatthefocusofthisevaluationwastostudythepotentialfor integratedhouseholdinterventions,asopposedtotheeffectofthespecificinterventionsin question.Theevaluationwasconductedbyrapidappraisal methods,includingkeyinformant interviews.AllquantitativedatawasobtainedfromstudyingreportssubmittedbyGTZafter ourevaluation. Aseriesofevents–mostlybeyondthecontroloftheprojectmanagers–affectedtheproject overitscourse.Thisledtosomedifficultiesintheinterpretationofavailabledata onthe projectimplementationandimpacts,issueswhicharediscussedfurtherinsection2.2.Dueto this,andtoafocusthatwasmoregearedtoassessingintegrationperse,ourconclusionsand recommendationsdrawsubstantiallyonthevisit,withsupportfromreportsanddatawhere thisisavailable. The followingarekeyresultsthatemergedfromtheevaluationexercise: Communityresponse Therewasclearsupportfortheinterventionamongstthestudygroupandneighbouring residents.Bothbeneficiariesandprojectimplementersfoundtheintegration ofhealth interventionstobeefficientandeffective.Asignificantlyraisedawarenessoftheprojectand generalhealthwasreported.Thegreatestcomplaintregardedstoveprices,whichweretoo expensiveformostmembersofMambanda,andsoldbestwhensubsidized. 9 Implementerbenefits Themainimplementerbenefitsincludedconsolidatingawarenesscampaigns, implementationanddatacollection,reachingagreatertargetaudienceandpromoting preventiveactionforbothALRIanddiarrhoeawithasingletheme(thekitchen). Targetpopulationbenefits Twoproductsbeingpromotedatonce(timesaved),amoreconsolidated/holistic understandingof healthandapotentiallymoreenduringmessagewerethekeybenefitsto theprojectbeneficiaries. Trainedcommunityworkers Thetrainedlocalcommunityworkers,whopromotedandsoldtheproductsdirectlyto households,playanimportantroleingeneratinginterestanddemandfortheproducts . Theyimpartedafeelingoffamiliarity andtrust,andbridgedthedividebetween implementersandcommunity. Quantitativeimpact Theshortdurationofthispilotstudydidnotallowforcollectingsufficientdatatoquantify theimpactonhealthfromtheinterventiontechnologies.Itwasalsonotpossibleto numericallydemonstrateanincreaseinsalesanduptake specificallyduetothesynergy. Therewaslittledataoncompliance,hardmeasuresofuptakeorof‘treatment’effects(e.g. chlorineresiduals,airpollutionmeasurements),orhealthimprovementsinrelationtoeither product.However,reporteduseofWGforwatertreatmentrosefrom1to34%forthe interventionhouseholds, andtherewasanincreasefrom1to12%inMMSstoveusein thosesamehouseholds.Duringtheproject220stovesweresoldtoindividualslocatedinthe interventionareawhile442weresoldtoindividualsoutsidetheintervention.Althoughthe reasonsforgreatersalesoutsideMambandahavenotbeen specificallyinvestigated, anecdotalaccountsindicatethatthestoveswereunaffordableinMambanda,evenwiththe 30%subsidy.However,wealthierhouseholdsoutsideMambandacouldaffordthestoves andfoundthemtechnologicallysuperiortootherstovesonthemarket. Discussion Thecombinedapproachofenvironmentalhealthinterventionswasreceivedwellby implementers andbeneficiariesalike.Keygainsnotedbyimplementersincludedefficiency onseveralfronts(e.g.numberofcommunityinterventions,time,cost),andimprovements throughconsolidatedpromotion.Keydifficultiesaroseinrespectofaffordabilityofthe interventions(principallythestove),funding,andinmanagingprojectsustainabilityinthe faceofchallenginglocal circumstances.PricewasanimportantbarriertothesaleofMMS, whichneverthelessbenefitedfromconsiderableawarenessandinterest.Theprojectwould havebenefittedfrommoresystematicanddetailedmonitoringandevaluation. Inconsideringthedeliveryofcombinedinterventions,wefoundananalysisofmotivational factorstobeimportant.The indoorairqualitycomponentoftheinterventionsawperceived benefitssuchasefficientfueluse,acleanercookingenvironmentandvisiblesmoke reduction.Useofwatertreatmentontheotherhandseemedmoreduetoaraised awareness,andhealth‐andhygiene‐basedbehaviourchange.Thesetwointerventions,with differentmotivations, werepackagedunderacommontheme:thekitchen.Thistheme