CMP 6100 – PLANNING HISTORY & THEORY AKA CITY & PROFESSION

CMP 6100 – PLANNING HISTORY & THEORY AKA: CITY & PROFESSION University of Utah – College of Architecture and Planning Department of City & Metropolitan Planning Tues & Thurs: 12:25 – 1:45 pm Classroom: BUC 303 Instructor: Dr Michael Larice email: larice@arch.utah.edu office: 238 CA+P tel: (215) 430 3203 (10am – 10pm only) office hrs: Tues afternoons (door signup) Teaching Assistant: Liz Gray email: ejdelgiorno@gmail.com tel: () (11am – 10pm pm only) COURSE DESCRIPTION CMP 6100: Planning History and Theory is a course intended to both provoke and help focus attention on your future in planning It is not an academic history course that forces rote memorization of details and esoterica It is not a theory course in advanced navel gazing and posturing Rather, it is an opportunity to gauge where we stand as a society in the ongoing historical and practical processes of city making, and more importantly … where you stand with respect to the profession The course is an introduction to living and emergent urbanisms and the theories we use in decision-making, urban development and planning practice Since perspectives on cities and regions are endlessly relative, the approach to course material will be both pluralistic and comparative, eschewing any single normative notion of appropriateness or rightness We will examine course topics from a variety of disciplinary perspectives Planning History and Theory will be structured in a chronological manner – integrating the history of city planning/city making, intellectual thought, urban form, theory and planning practice by period The course will be conducted in an interactive lecture format that requires active student participation Sometime within the last decade, and for the first time in human history, the population of the world became primarily urban While the last two centuries of development and growth have brought great benefit to many cities, these benefits are not universally shared between and within cities Additionally, a very distinct set of urban challenges has been collectively recognized around the world that impacts present-day quality of life and future possibilities The evidence is palpable: expanding urban slums, an increasing wealth gap, economic restructuring, diminishing resources, habitat loss, new and re-emergent diseases, budgetary struggle, youth alienation, deteriorating infrastructure, and growing climatological threat — this list is growing This largest urban migration in human history has some surprising demographic characteristics as well, including the feminization of poverty, decreasing life expectancy rates in many countries, and exponential population growth within the poorest countries While some places like Dubai and Shanghai experience dazzling growth and construction, other places like Lagos and Mumbai continue to suffer from the impacts of poverty and disinvestment The spatial impacts of urbanization are no less, if not differently focused in North America From exorbitant housing costs fueled by international migration in Vancouver and San Francisco, to the continuing impacts of economic restructuring in Detroit and Philadelphia — from untenable pollution and slums in Mexico City and Port-au-Prince, to the ever-exploding costs of urban infrastructure maintenance in Los Angeles and New York — the challenges to the next generation of planners can be overwhelming In the midst of these challenges, the planning field is re-assessing itself in all aspects of practice Some authors are suggesting the field is in crisis and want a full-scale reconceptualization of practice; others call for continued tinkering and adjustment Several department chairs across the country have recently proposed that we are entering a period focused more on implementation and the realization of outcomes, rather than just getting to the best decision or plan making In responding to the multiplicity of relative perspectives – and calls for greater democratization – the next generation of planners will undoubtedly need a broader knowledge and skillset to avoid the often naïve and dangerous universalism of the past The planners of tomorrow will need to plan more collaboratively, effectively, and contingently This course is but one step in addressing the crucial, mind-numbing and fascinating issues that face planners in the years to come The course is offered once each year, and is suggested as a first semester core course for incoming students to the Masters level program in City and Metropolitan Planning COURSE REQUIREMENTS Class Sessions: The course will run for hour and 20 minutes every Tuesday and Thursday during the semester Classes are held during the lunch hour, so please adjust your lunch schedule accordingly As this is a relatively small course, participation is required Since the course will be taught in a hybrid seminar/lecture format, you will each be called on to participate in course sessions throughout the semester Course Readings: Each session of the course will be accompanied by a set of readings that will be provided on the University’s digital course platform There are no other required textbooks for this course Because this is a foundational course and students come from a variety of backgrounds, the readings provide both introductory and advanced level material Course participants will be expected to come to each session having read the required literature for that day, and be ready to answer specific and synthetic questions about the material Supplemental readings will also be supplied for those that want to engage the material more deeply The instructor acknowledges the heavy, but necessary reading load in this course and strongly encourages students to work efficiently and continuously in keeping up with the material Writing Assignments: To help students synthesize and apply this reading material, several one-sheet writing assignments will be required throughout the semester Students will choose and submit a minimum of four reading synthesis papers according to their individual calendars and to accommodate other personal life needs In addition to the one page reading synthesis essays, students will also need to submit a term paper As the practice of city and metropolitan planning is rarely done in isolation and often with stakeholders who hold different values and interests, students will be expected to work with an assigned partner on a single comparative term paper The subject of this paper will involve comparing different aspects of contemporary US planning culture to the planning culture of another nation, with city examples used to illustrate local adaptation The course instructor will assign the foreign country to the students The dates of distribution and their due dates for writing assignments are listed on the course calendar that follows Students will format their term papers in a professional report format using Adobe InDesign (or equivalent), rather than in typical academic formatting Precise instructions will be provided for each writing exercise Course Exams: All course participants will be required to pass a midterm and final exam Both exams are formatted similarly: an objective in-class section (term identification, slide identification, short answer fill-in) and two take home essays The midterm exam will be administered during a regular class session It covers the first half of the course material prior to Fall Break Exams administered in-class will be conducted in closed-book, closed-note, and closed-electronic format Study guides will be distributed prior to the midterm and final Grading: CMP 6100 includes four graded components (2 exams, term paper, reading essays, and a participation grade) Course measurement on exercises and exams will be allocated based on: full completion of required elements; professionalism of writing and submittal; the quality of substantive content; degree of enlightened response; depth of analysis; innovation and creative thought; and evidence of personal development The same grade will be earned by all team members with respect to group exercises Participation grades will be based on willingness and ability to engage in class discussions Students' ability to respond effectively will contribute greatly to their participation grade You will need to voluntarily participate in the course – please don’t depend on the course instructor to force your participation Exam grades will be curved, while writing assignments will not be Final course grades will be curved to the highest point total earned by a student, and will disregard bell curve considerations Exercises submitted after deadlines will be marked down a penalty of a full letter grade automatically (eg, from an A to a B) (unless PRIOR email agreement between the student and instructor has been reached because of legitimate family or medical emergency) The final course grade will be calculated from the following component percentages: Four Reading Synthesis Essays (5% each) Midterm Exam: In-class + take home essays Final Exam: In-class + take home essays Comparative Planning Cultures Term Paper Course Participation 20% 20% 20% 30% 10% The following grades and grade meanings will be used for the course, and the corresponding percent ranges for each grade have been determined by the course instructor Grade Grade Meaning % Range A AB+ B BC+ C CF I Outstanding Excellent Very good Good Competent Fair Acceptable Marginal Failure / Non-completion Incomplete 93-100 90-92 87-89 83-86 80-82 77-79 73-76 70-72 < 69 w/ instructor consent NOTES Do not make travel plans during scheduled exams – no makeup or early exams will be given The use of cell phones and other personal electronics are disallowed in the course Please make sure that cell phones are silenced and stored away when coming into class The instructor allows laptops in the class only for the purpose of note-taking Students discovered to be chatting, surfing, or accessing internet sites during class time will lose student privileges for laptop use for all other students Internet use inhibits course participation for the student and negatively impacts the course experience for others The instructor will call you out for this The University of Utah seeks to provide equal access to its programs, services and activities for people with disabilities If you will need accommodations in the class, reasonable prior notice needs to be given to the instructor and the Center for Disability Services, 162 Union Building, 581-5020 (V/TDD) CDS will work with you and the instructor to make arrangements for accommodations All students are expected to maintain professional behavior in the classroom setting, according to the Student Code, spelled out in the Student Handbook Students have specific rights in the classroom as detailed in Article III of the Code The Code also specifies proscribed conduct (Article XI) that involves cheating on tests, plagiarism, and/or collusion, as well as fraud, theft, etc Students should read the Code carefully and know they are responsible for the content According to Faculty Rules and Regulations, it is the faculty responsibility to enforce responsible classroom behaviors, beginning with verbal warnings and progressing to dismissal from class and a failing grade Students have the right to appeal such action to the Student Behavior Committee CPLN 510 - Course Schedule and Reading List FALL 2010 PART ONE: PERSPECTIVES ON URBAN THEORY WEEK 1:2 Thursday – Sept Course Overview & Administration + 21st Century Urban Challenges Readings: (112) Pierce, Neal R., Curtis W Johnson, and Farley M Peters 2008 Ch 10: New Frontiers for a Global Urban Commons Century of the City: No Time to Lose NY: Rockefeller Foundation, pp 374-429 (55) (big words w/ pictures) Kotkin, Joel 2005 Preface; Introduction: Places Sacred, Safe and Busy; Chronology; and Conclusion: The Urban Future The City: A Global History New York: Modern Library Chronicles, pp.xv-xxix, 147-160 (34) Reader, John 2005 Ch 1: First Impression; and, Ch 20: We Tread Too Heavily Cities New York: Vintage, pp 1-9, 294-306 (23) WEEK 2:1 Tuesday – Sept 14 Planning and Planning Theory Readings: (155) Allmendinger, Philip 2002 Ch 1: What is Theory? Planning Theory New York: Palgrave, pp 1-25 (26) Friedmann, John 1987 The Terrain of Planning Theory Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action NY: Princeton Press pp 19-48 (29) Brooks, Michael P 2002 Ch 2: Planning Practice and Planning Theory Planning Theory for Practitioners Chicago: American Planning Association, pp 21-31 (11) Campbell, Scott and Susan S Fainstein 1996 Introduction: The Structure and Debates of Planning Theory Readings in Planning Theory Oxford UK: Blackwell, pp 1-12 (13) Forrester, John 2000 Ch 30: Why Planning Theory? Educating Citizens, Reccognizing Differences, Mediating Deliberations In: The Profession of City Planning: Changes, Images and Challenges: 1950-2000 L Rodwin & B Sanyal, eds New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutgers, 2000, pp 253-260 (8) Harvey, David 1985 On Planning the Ideology of Planning The Urbanization of Capital In: Readings in Planning Theory S Campbell and S Fainstein, eds Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, pp 176-197 (22) Klosterman, Richard E 1985 Arguments for and Against Planning Town Planning Review v 56, n In: Readings in Planning Theory S Campbell and S Fainstein, eds Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, pp 150-168 (19) Wildavsky, Aaron 1973 If Planning is Everything, Maybe it's Nothing Policy Sciences No 4, 1973, pp 127-153 (27) 2:2 Thursday – Sept 16 Professor Larice away in Aruba with studio Weds Sept 15 – Sun Sept 26 Class meets today with TAs for distribution of assignments Distribute: Neighborhood Life Paper + assign teams Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper + directions WEEK 3:1 Tuesday – Sept 21 Economic & Spatial Theories of Urban Land Use - Jack Robinson lecture Due in Class: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (46) Hartshorn, Truman Asa 1992 Ch 8: Central Place Theory Interpreting the City: An Urban Geography New York: Wiley, pp 137-156 (20) Hartshorn, Truman Asa 1992 Ch 11: Land Use Dynamics Interpreting the City: An Urban Geography New York: Wiley, pp 219-241 (22) Meck, Stuart 2006 Selections from Part 4.2: Theories of City Form: Life-Cycle Model of Land-Use Change; and Recent Theories Planning and Urban Design Standards APA, ed New York: John Wiley, pp 403-404 & 407-408 (4) 3:2 Thursday – Sept 23 No Class Students should use this day to work collectively on their team papers and visit neighborhoods WEEK 4:1 Tuesday – Sept 28 Understanding Urbanism: Beginnings and Endings Readings: (111) Mumford, Lewis 1937 What is a City? Architectural Record 32, 1937 from The City Reader D LeGates and F Stout, eds London: Routledge, pp 92-96 (5) Phillips, E Barbara 1996 Selections from Ch 4: From Urban Specks to Global Village City Lights: Urban-Suburban Life in the Global Society New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press pp 82-90 (9) Mumford, Lewis 1961 Selections from Ch 2: The Crystallization of the City, 2.1 – The First Urban Transformation, and 2.2 – The First Urban Implosion The City in History New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, pp 29-39 (11) O’Sullivan, Arthur 1996 (3rd Ed.) Chapter 2: Why Do Cities Exist? Urban Economics Chicago/Boston: Irwin, pp 15-38 (24) Diamond, Jared 2005 Prologue: A Tale of Two Farms; and, Ch 16: The World as a Polder: What Does It All Mean to Us Today? Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed New York: Viking Press, pp 1-23, 486-525 (62) 4:2 Thursday – Sept 30 Urbanization Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (63) Davis, Kingsley 1965 The Urbanization of the Human Population Scientific American In: The City Reader D LeGates and F Stout, eds London/New York: Routledge, pp 25-34 (10) Champion, Tony 2001 Ch 9: Urbanization, Suburbanization, Counterurbanization, Reurbanization Handbook of Urban Studies London: Sage, pp 143-161 (19) Castells, Manuel 1972 Selections from Ch 1: Urbanization The Urban Question In: The Castells Reader on Cities and Social Theory Ida Susser, ed Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2002 pp 20-33 (14) UNCHS (Habitat) 1996 Ch 1.2: Global Population Change and Urbanization An Urbanizing World: Global Report on Human Settlements 1996 Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press for UNCHS (Habitat) pp 11-31 (20) WEEK 5:1 Tuesday – Oct Urban Social Theory: Concepts of Neighborhood and Community Due in Class: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (162) Paddison, Ronan 2001 Ch 12: Communities in the City Handbook of Urban Studies London: Sage, pp 194-204 (11) Spates, James L and John J Macionis 1982 Ch 2: The Emergence of Urban Sociology The Sociology of Cities New York: St Martin's Press, pp 28-55 (28)Paddison, Ronan 2001 Ch 12: Communities in the City Handbook of Urban Studies London: Sage, pp 194-204 (11) Hester, Randolph 1975 Neighborhood Space Neighborhood Space In: The Urban Design Reader M Larice & E Macdonald, eds London/New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2006, pp 376-386 (11) Johnson, Stephen 2001 Chapter 2: Street Level Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software NY: Scriber, pp 73-100 (27) Anderson, Elijah 1990 Down Germantown Avenue Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City NY: Norton, pp 15-34 (35) Anderson, Elijah 2004 The Cosmopolitan Canopy Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2004; 595: 14-31 (18) Oldenburg, Ray 1989 Chapter – The Problem of Place in America; and Chapter – The Character of Third Places The Great Good Place NY: Marlowe & Co (40) Putnam, Robert D 1995 Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital Journal of Democracy In: The City Reader D LeGates and F Stout, eds London/New York: Routledge, pp 105-113 (9) 5:2 Thursday – Oct Urban Political Economy & Governance: Transformation of Space & Value Distribute: Midterm Exam Study Guide Readings: (175) Harvey, David 1985 Ch 1: The Urbanization of Capital The Urban Experience Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Press, pp.17-58 (42) Logan, John R and Harvey L Molotch 1987 Ch 2: Places as Commodoties; and Ch 3: The City as a Growth Machine Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Places Berkeley CA: University of California Press, pp 17-49, 50-98 (82) Gottdiener, Mark Undated A Marx for Our Time: Henri Lefebvre and The Production of Space Architectur – Produktion und Gebrauch gebauter Umwelt http://www.anarchitektur.com/aa01-lefebvre/gottdiener.html (7) Savage, Mike and Alan Warde 1993 Ch 3: Cities and Uneven Economic Development Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity New York: Continuum, pp 34-62.(29) Harvey, David 1989 From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation of Urban Governance in Late Capitalism Geografiska Annaler B 71, pp 3-17 (15) WEEK 6:1 Tuesday – Oct 12 Dual / Dueling Objectives: Growth and Development Readings: (84) Jacobs, Jane 2000 Ch 2: The Nature of Development; & Ch 3: The Nature of Expansion The Nature of Economies NY: Modern Library pp 15-64 (50) Simon, David, ed 2006 Selected biographic entries: Robert Chambers, pp 73-78; Mohandas (Mahatma) Ghandi, pp 106-111; Fritz Schumacher, pp 218-223; and for contrast Walt Whitman Rostow, pp 211-217 Fifty Key Thinkers on Development London/New York: Routledge (25) Sen, Amartya 1999 Intro Development as Freedom NY: Knopf pp 3-11 (9) 6:2 Thursday – Oct 14 MIDTERM EXAM in class + Distribute Midterm Essay WEEK 7:1 Tuesday – Oct 19 Comparative Urbanisms & Planning Cultures: An Introduction Due in Class: Midterm Essay Readings: (150) Sanyal, Bishwapriya 2005 Hyrbrid Planning Cultures: The Search for the Global Cultural Commons Comparative Planning Cultures Sanyal, Bishwapriya, ed 2005 London: Routledge, pp 3-28 (26) Friedmann, John 2005 Planning Cultures in Transition In: Comparative Planning Cultures Sanyal, Bishwapriya, ed 2005 London: Routledge, pp 29-44 (16) Cullingworth, J Barry & Vincent Nadin 1997 (original 1964) Ch 1: The Nature of Planning; and Ch 4: (partial) The Planning Policy Framework Town & Country Planning in the UK, 12th Edition London: Routledge, pp 1-13, 69-88 (33) Hall, Peter 1998 Ch 1: Great Cities in their Golden Ages Cities in Civilization NY: Fromm International, pp 3-23 (21) Punter, John 2003 Ch 1: Introducing Vancouver; and Ch 10: Conclusion: Assessing Vancouver’s Achievement The Vancouver Achievement Vancouver BC: The UBC Press, pp 3-14, 346-387 (54) 7:2 Thursday – Oct 21 Pre-Industrial Urbanism: Debunking Myths and Pondering Lessons Readings: (162) Bradley, Harriet 1996 Changing Social Structures: Class and Gender Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert and Kenneth Thompson, eds Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp 122-148 (27) Morris, A.E.J 1994 Ch 1: The Early Cities History of Urban Form Before the Industrial Revolution, 3rd Edition Essex, UK: Longman Sci & Tech, pp 1-34 (34) Kitto, H.D.F 1951 The Polis The Greeks In: The City Reader D LeGates and F Stout, eds London/New York: Routledge, pp 43-48 (6) Mumford, Lewis 1938 Ch 1: Protection and the Medieval Town The Culture of Cities New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, pp 13-72 (60) Bianca, Stefano 2000 Basic Principles of Islam and their Social, Spatial & Artistic Implications Urban Form in the Arab World Thames & Hudson, pp 22-47 (26) Abu-Lughod, Janet 1987 The Islamic City: Historic Myths, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance International Journal of Middle East Studies In: The City Reader 3rd edition, Richard T LeGates and Frederic Stout, eds London: Routledge 1996, pp 172-180 (9) 7:3 Friday – Oct 22 Due in City Plng Dept Office by End of Day: Neighborhood Life Paper WEEK Catherine Bonier away this week 8:1 Tuesday – Oct 26 PLANNING THEORY I: THE DESIGN MODEL Distribute: Comparative Planning Cultures Paper Readings: (31) Lynch, Kevin and Gary Hack 1984 Ch 5: Design Site Planning, 3rd Edition Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp 127-143 (17) Mann, Thorbjoern 2004 The Nature of Design Problems; Mismatched Problems and Approaches; and The Trap of Working Sequentially Time Management for Architects and Designers: Challenges and Remedies New York/London: W.W Norton, pp 65-69, 73-81 (14) 8:2 Thursday – Oct 28 Colonial & Imperial Urbanism: The International Development Project Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (180) Hall, Stuart 1996 The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert and Kenneth Thompson, eds Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp 184-227 (44) King, Anthony 1977 Exporting Planning: the Colonial and Neo-Colonial Experience Shaping an Urban World, G E Cherry London: Mansell, pp 203-219 (17) Korten, David C 2006 Ch 6: Empire; Ch Modern Empire; Ch 11: Empire's Victory; Ch 13: Wake-up Call; Ch 14: Prisons of the Mind; The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community San Francisco: Barret-Koehler Publishers, pp 109141, 181-200, 217 250 (85) Smith, Neil 1996 Ch 2: Is Gentrification a Dirty Word? The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City London: Routledge, pp 30-47 (18) Nash, Dennison 1989 Ch 2: Tourism as a Form of Imperialism Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism Valene L Smith, ed UPenn Press, pp 37-52 (16) WEEK Professor Larice away this week – class still meets though 9:1 Tuesday – Nov Industrialization & Modernity: Creative Destruction & Progress Catherine Bonier lecture Due in Class: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (99) Hamilton, Peter 1996 The Enlightenment: The Birth of Social Science Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert and Kenneth Thompson, eds Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp 19-54 (36) Berman, Marshall 1982 Introduction: Modernity – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow; and Ch 3: Baudelaire: Modernism in the Streets All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity NY: Simon & Schuster, pp 15-36, 131-171 (63) 9:2 Thursday – Nov PLANNING THEORY II – THE SCIENTIFIC RATIONAL MODEL Jack Robinson Lecture Readings: (23) Brooks, Michael P 2002 Ch 6: Planning Centralized Rationality: The Planner as Applied Scientist Planning Theory for Practitioners Chicago: American Planning Association, pp 81-95 (15) Baum, Howell S 1996 Why the Rational Paradigm Persists: Tales from the Field Journal of Planning Education and Research, v 15, n 2, pp 127-134 (8) WEEK 10 10:1 Tuesday – Nov Modern Urbanism Readings: (89) LeCorbusier 1929 The Pack Donkey’s Way and Man’s Way; and, A Contemporary City The City of To-Morrow and Its Planning In: The Urban Design Reader Michael Larice and Elizabeth Macdonald, eds London: Routledge 2006, pp 6675 (10) Holston, James 1989 Ch 1: Premises and Paradoxes The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasilia Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, pp 3-29 (27) Jacobs, Jane 1961 Foreward and Introduction The Death and Life of Great American Cities New York: Modern Library Edition, 1993, pp xi-xvii, 5-34 (38) Alexander, Christopher 1965 A City Is Not A Tree Architectural Forum In: The City Reader, 1st Edition D LeGates and F Stout, eds London/New York: Routledge, pp 118-131 (14) 10:2 Thursday – Nov 11 PLANNING THEORY III – THE STRATEGIC PLANNING MODEL & PLANNING THEORY IV – THE INCREMENTAL MODEL Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (116) Steiner, George M 1979 Ch What is Strategic Planning? Strategic Planning: What Every Manager Must Know NY: Free Press Paperbacks/Simon & Schuster, pp 12-34 (23) Kaufman, Jerome L and Harvey M Jacobs 1987 A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning Journal of the American Planning Association v 53, n In: Readings in Planning Theory S Campbell and S Fainstein, eds Oxford UK/Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, pp 323-343 (21) Brooks, Michael P 2002 Ch 7: Centralized Non-Rationality: The Planner Confronts Politics Planning Theory for Practitioners Chicago: American Planning Association, pp 97-106 (10) Lindblom, Charles E 1959 The Science of Muddling Through Public Administration Review v 19, n.2, Spring 1959 In: Readings in Planning Theory S Campbell and S Fainstein, eds Oxford UK/Cambridge MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, pp 288-304 (17) Sager, Tore 1997 Incremental Planning for a Pluaralistic Democracy Planning Theory 18 Pp 36-59 (24) Schön, Donald A 1983 Ch 2: (partial) Reflection in Action The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action NY: Basic Books, pp 49-69 (21) 10 WEEK 11 11:1 Tuesday – Nov 16 Sub-Urban & Anti-Urban Themes Due in Class: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (142) Fishman, Robert 1987 Introduction Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Surburbia New York: Basic Books, pp 3-17 (15) Kotkin, Joel 2000 The Anti-Urban Impulse The New Geography: How the Digital Revolution is Reshaping the American Landscape, pp 27-51 (25) Garreau, Joel 1991 Ch 1: The Search for the Future Inside Ourselves Edge City: Life on the New Frontier New York: Doubleday, pp 1-15 (13 text) Dear, Michael J and Steven Flusty 2002 Ch 1: The Resistible Rise of the L.A School; and, Ch 16: The L.A School: A Personal Introduction From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage, pp 3-16 and 423-426 (18) Webber, Melvin M 1964 Order in Diversity: Community without Propinquity In: Exploration into Urban Structure L Wingo, ed, et al Philadelphia: U Penn Press, pp 23-54 (32) Hall, Peter 1996 Revisiting the Nonplace Urban Realm: Have We Come Full Circle? International Planning Studies, v 1, n 1, pp 7-15 (9) Koolhaas, Rem 1994 The Generic City S, M, L, XL In: The Urban Design Reader M Larice & E Macdonald, eds London/New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2006, pp 217-226 (12) Mitchell, William J 2000 Ch 1: Urban Requiem; and, Ch 5: Homes and Neighborhoods e-topia: Urban Life, Jim – But Not as We Know It Cambridge: MIT Press, pp 3-8, 71-82 (18) 11:2 Thursday – Nov 18 Postmodernity: The Continuing Debate Readings: (111) Thompson, Kenneth 1996 Social Pluralism and Post-Modernity Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert and Kenneth Thompson, eds Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp 564-594 (31) Sandercock, Leonie 2003 Mongrel Cities: Can We Live Together? Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities NY: Continuum Press, pp 85-105 (21) Qadeer, Mohammad A 1997 Pluralistic Planning for Multicultural Cities: The Canadian Practice Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (4): 481-494 (14) Frisch, Michael 2002 Planning as a Heterosexist Project Journal of Planning Education and Research 21: 254-266 (13) Sandercock, Leonie and Ann Forsyth 1990 Gender: A New Agenda for Planning Theory Planning Theory Newsletter Winter: 61-92 (32) 11 WEEK 12 12:1 Tuesday – Nov 23 PLANNING THEORY V – THE COMMUNICATIVE MODEL Readings: (119) Brooks, Michael P 2002 Ch 8: Decentralized Rationality: The Planner as Political Activist; and, 9: Decentralized Non-Rationality: The Planner as Communicator Planning Theory for Practitioners Chicago: American Planning Association, pp 107-131 (25) Innes, Judith E 1995 Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice Journal of Planning Education and Research, v 14, n 3, pp 183-188 (6) Sandercock, Leonie 1998 Selection from Ch 1: A Death Foretold: A Chronicle of Modernist Planning: The Pillars of Modernist Planning Wisdom; Ch 3: Exploring Planning's Knowledges; Ch 4: The Difference that Theory Makes; and Ch 8: Planning for Cosmopolis: A New Paradigm and Appendix: The Planner Tamed: Preparing Planners for the Twenty-First Century.Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities Chichester UK/New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp 22-30, 57-104, 203-230 (88) 12:2 Thursday – Nov 25 Thanksgiving Holiday – NO CLASS! NOTHING IS DUE! WEEK 13 13:1 Tuesday – Nov 30 PLANNING THEORY VI - THE CONTINGENCY MODEL Readings: (71) McCaskey, Michael B 1974 A Contingency Approach to Planning: Planning with Goals and Planning without Goals Academy of Management Journal Jun, v 17, no 2, pp 281-290 (10) Christensen, Karen S 1985 Coping with Uncertainty in Planning APA Journal Winter 1985, pp 63-71 (9) Schwartz, Peter 1991 Ch 1: The Pathfinder's Tale; Ch 3: The Scenario-Building Animal; Afterward: The Value of a Strategic Conversation; and Appendix: Steps to Developing Scenarios The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World New York: Currency/Doubleday, pp 3-15, 29-43, 219-225, and 241-248 (43) Bloom, Michael J and Mary K Menefee 1994 Scenario Planning and Contingency Planning Public Productivity & Management Review v XVII, n Spring 1994, pp 223-230 (9) 12 13:2 Thursday – Dec Postmodern Urbanism: Finding Meaning in a Hyper-modern World or Everything Old is New Again Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (159) Shaw, Douglas V 2001 The Post-Industrial City Handbook of Urban Studies London: Sage, pp 284-294 (11) Ellin, Nan 1996 Themes of Postmodern Urbanism Postmodern Urbanism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press, pp 154-193 (40) Gottdiener, Mark 1997 Ch 2: From a Themed to an Anti-Themed Environment: Natural Codes, Ancient Cities, and Modernism The Theming of America: Dreams, Visions and Commercial Spaces New York: Westview Press, pp 16-42 (27) Congress for the New Urbanism 1996 The Charter of the New Urbanism In: The Urban Design Reader M Larice & E Macdonald, eds London/New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2006, pp 308-311.(5 w/ intro by Macdonald) Political Economy Research Center 2000 The Lone Mountain Compact: Principles for Preserving Freedom and Livability in America’s Cities and Suburbs (2) Landry, Charles 2008 Introduction: The Creative City – Its Origins and Futures; and Ch 7: Getting Creativity Planning Started The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators London: Earthscan, pp xxi-l, 163-196 (74) 13:3 Friday – Dec Due in City Plng Dept Office by End of Day: Comparative Plng Culture Paper WEEK 14 14:1 Tuesday – Dec Teleological Theories: Ecology, Sustainability and Livability Due in Class: Reading Synthesis Paper Distribute: Final Exam Study Guide Readings: (136) Leopold, Aldo 1949 The Land Ethic A Sand County Almanac In: The Sustainable Urban Development Reader S Wheeler and T Beatley, eds 2004 London/New York: Routledge, pp 20-29 (10) Lyle, John T 1985 Design for Human Ecosystems Design for Human Ecosystems In: Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader Simon Swaffield, ed Philadelphia: Univ of Pennsylvania Press, pp 178-187 (10) Naess, Arne 1986 From Part – Deep Ecology: The Deep Ecological Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects In: Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology Michael Zimmerman, et al, eds Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp.185-203 (18) Bookchin, Murray 2001 From Part – Political Ecology: What Is Social Ecology? In: Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology Michael Zimmerman, et al, eds Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp 436-453 (18) World Commission on the Environment and Development 1987 Towards Sustainable Development Our Common Future In: The Sustainable Urban Development Reader S Wheeler and T Beatley, eds 2004 London/New York: Routledge, pp 53-57 (5) Readings continue on next page 13 Wheeler, Stephen M 2004 Theory of Sustainability Planning Planning for Sustainability London: Routledge, pp 34-52 (19) Frey, Hildebrand 1999 Compact, Decentralised or What? The Sustainable City Debate Designing the City: Towards a More Sustainable In: The Urban Design Reader M Larice & E Macdonald, eds London/New York: Routledge, 2006, pp 332-347 (16) Gordon, Peter and Harry W Richardson 1997 Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal? APA Journal Winter 1997, pp 95-106 (12) Ewing, Reid 1997 Is Los Angeles Sprawl Desirable? APA Journal Winter 1997, pp 107-126 (19) Godschalk, David R 2004 Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities JAPA, v 70, no 1, Winter 2004 pp 5-13 (9) 14:2 Thursday – Dec Global Urbanisms – World Cities / Networks / Slums Distribute Final Exam Essay Questions Readings: (377) McGraw, Anthony 1996 A Global Society Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies Stuart Hall, David Held, Don Hubert and Kenneth Thompson, eds Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp 466-503 (38) Scott, Allen J., John Agnew, Edward W Soja, and Michael Storper 2001 Global CityRegions In: Global City Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy Allen J Scott, ed New York: Oxford University Press, pp 11-30 (20) Sassen, Saskia 2006 Ch 1: Place and Production in the Global Economy; Ch 2: The Urban Impact of Economic Globalization; and Ch.8: A New Geography of Centers and Margins Cities in a World Economy, 3rd Edition Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press-Sage pp 1-13, 15-44, 193-199 (50) Castells, Manuel 2000 Ch 6: The Space of Flows The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd Edition Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishers, pp 407-459 (53) Sachs, Jeffrey D 2005 Ch 2: The Spread of Economic Prosperity; Ch 14: A Global Compact to End Poverty; and Ch 18: Our Generation’s Challenge The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time NY: Penguin, pp.26-50, 266-287, 345-368 (71) Watts, Michael 1995 'A New Deal in Emotions' - Theory and Practice and the Crisis of Development In: Power of Development Jonathon Crush, ed London/New York: Routledge pp 44-62 (19) Easterly, William 2006 Ch 1: Planners vs Searchers White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good New York: Penguin Press, pp 3-30, (28) Packer, George 2006 The Megacity: Decoding the Chaos of Lagos The New Yorker November 13, 2006, v 82, n 37 (10) Davis, Mike 2006 Ch 1: The Urban Climacteric; Ch The Prevalence of Slums; and Ch 8: A Surplus Humanity? Planet of Slums London/New York: Verso, pp 1-49, 174-198 (75) Cohen, Michael A 1991 Executive Summary Urban Policy and Economic Development: An Agenda for the 1990s Washington DC: World Bank Policy Paper, pp 3-13 (11) UN Habitat 2006 Ch 1.1 City-zens of the World: Urban Trends in the 21 st Century; Ch 1.2 Putting Slums on the Map: A Global and Regional Review; and Ch 1.4 The Struggle to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals Will be More or Less Lost in Cities State of the World’s Cities 2006/7 London: Earthscan, pp 16-33, 46-55 (30) 14 READING WEEK Saturday Dec 11 – Tuesday Dec 14 FINAL EXAM WEEK Thursday Evening – Dec 16 Final Exam – In-Class Portion – Time and Location TBD Friday – Dec 17 Due in City Plng Dept Office by End of Day: Final Exam Essays 15 ... Tuesday – Sept 14 Planning and Planning Theory Readings: (155) Allmendinger, Philip 2002 Ch 1: What is Theory? Planning Theory New York: Palgrave, pp 1-25 (26) Friedmann, John 1987 The Terrain of Planning. .. Ann Forsyth 1990 Gender: A New Agenda for Planning Theory Planning Theory Newsletter Winter: 61-92 (32) 11 WEEK 12 12:1 Tuesday – Nov 23 PLANNING THEORY V – THE COMMUNICATIVE MODEL Readings: (119)... STRATEGIC PLANNING MODEL & PLANNING THEORY IV – THE INCREMENTAL MODEL Distribute: Reading Synthesis Paper Readings: (116) Steiner, George M 1979 Ch What is Strategic Planning? Strategic Planning: