A fuzzy ahp framework for evaluating stakeholders performance in construction projects

185 1 0
A fuzzy ahp framework for evaluating stakeholders performance in construction projects

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HO CHI MINH CITY HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY NGUYEN THANH MINH A FUZZY - AHP FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING STAKEHOLDERS PERFORMANCE IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Major: Construction Management Major code: 8580302 MASTER’S THESIS HO CHI MINH CITY, August 2022 THIS RESEARCH IS COMPLETED AT: HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY - VNU - HCM Instructor 1: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet Instructor 2: Dr Do Tien Sy Examiner 1: Dr Nguyen Anh Thu Examiner 2: Dr Pham Hai Chien Master’s thesis is defended at HCM city University of Technology, VNU- HCM City on August 22nd, 2022 The board of the Master’s Thesis Defense Council includes: Assoc Prof Dr Luong Duc Long - Chairman Assoc Prof Dr Pham Vu Hong Son - Secretary Dr Nguyen Anh Thu - Counter-argument member Dr Pham Hai Chien - Counter-argument member Dr Nguyen Hoai Nghia - Council member Verification of the Chairman of the Master’s Thesis Defense Council and the Dean of faculty of Civil Engineering after the thesis being corrected (If any) CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNCIL HEAD OF FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Assoc Prof Dr Le Anh Tuan i VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HO CHI MINH CITY HO CHI MINH CITY SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence ậ Freedom ậ Happines UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THE TASK SHEET OF MASTER’S THESIS Full name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Date of birth: 13/03/1996 Major: Construction Management Student code: 2070688 Place of birth: Nghe An Major code: 8580302 I THESIS TOPIC A Fuzzy - AHP framework for evaluating stakeholder performance in construction projects TÊN TÀI ánh giá hi u su t c a bên tham gia d án xây d ng b ng mơ hình fuzzy-AHP II TASKS AND CONTENTS - Determine factors that affect Stakeholders Performance in construction project - Apply SEM Model to estimate the relationships of constructs affecting Stakeholders Performance and define a model to explain the entire set of relationships - Using the AHP approach, compute the weights of the groups of factor and evaluate their impact on Stakeholder Performance - Propose a thoroughly and objectively framework for evaluating Stakeholders Performance in construction project ii III TASKS STARTING DATE: 01/03/2022 IV TASKS ENDING DATE: 30/06/2022 V INSTRUCTOR: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy Ho Chi Minh City, 29th August 2022 INSTRUCTOR (Full name and signature) INSTRUCTOR (Full name and signature) Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet Dr Do Tien Sy HEAD OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT (Full name and signature) DEAN OF FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (Full name and signature) Dr Le Hoai Long Assoc Prof Le Anh Tuan iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU – HCM for supporting this study To be able to complete this thesis, it is not only my own efforts, I want to send my sincere thanks to the teachers in the subject, colleagues and classmates in Bach Khoa University I would like to express my deep gratitude to Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy, who gave me their maximal support and guidance throughout the process of completing this thesis The teachers have created all favorable conditions to support me in the whole time In the process of doing this thesis, I did not stop trying and trying to complete it well However, due to the limitation of knowledge and limitation of time, negligence and omission in the thesis cannot be avoided I am look forward to receiving contributions from teachers and friends Sincerely, Ho Chi Minh City, August 29th 2022 Nguyen Thanh Minh iv ABSTRACT Vietnam is a country with extremely rapid urbanization The urban system develops very quickly with many new urban areas being formed, and the infrastructure is continuously upgraded Therefore, in recent years, the construction industry is one of the most important spearhead industries for the country's economy However, the project implementation efficiency still has many problems, slow progress, negative in construction projects, inefficient use of capital are always topics that appear frequently in the news and newspaper The reason for this comes from the fact that the parties involved have not performed their responsibilities job well enough Therefore, it is necessary to study which factors affecting the project performance of the stakeholders and propose an evaluation framework to monitor the Stakeholders Performance throughout project life-cycle In this study, the main survey subjects and areas are located in Ho Chi Minh City Research to collect data to assess the causes affecting the working performance of parties in construction projects in Vietnam Through survey questionnaires and run statistical analysis to identify and rank these factors Then, the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method is applied to eliminate redundant factors and group the main groups of factors that affect the working performance between parties in a construction project The groups are named as “Working Environment”, “Project Management Organization Expertise”, “Contractor’s Construction Capacity”, “Client’s Comprehension”, “Effectiveness of Consultant/Designer”, “Proficient Supplier” The study also proposes to build an evaluation framework to monitor the performance of the parties in order to make timely recommendations and adjustments if the project implementation efficiency of the stakeholders is not good Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) model is also applied to analyze the correlation between groups of factors In particular, the group of “Proficient Supplier” has the strongest impact on the performance of stakeholders This indicates that, in order for the work of related stakeholders not to be negatively affected, the supplier needs to supply enough and timely the necessary amount of materials for the project v TÓM T T Vi t Nam m t qu c gia có t c đ th hóa di n c c k m nh m H th ng đô th phát tri n r t nhanh chóng v i nhi u khu th m i đ đ c hình thành, h t ng c s c nâng c p liên t c Chính v y nh ng n m tr l i đây, ngành xây d ng m t nh ng ngành m i nh n quan tr ng cho kinh t c a đ t n c D u v y hi u qu th c hi n d án nhìn chung v n cịn nhi u v n đ , ch m ti n đ , tiêu c c d án xây d ng, s d ng v n không hi u qu v n nh ng đ tài xu t hi n th ng xuyên báo chí b n tin Lí c a vi c đ n t vi c bên liên quan th c hi n trách nhi m công vi c c a ch a đ t t Do đó, vi c nghiên c u có nguyên nhân tác đ ng đ n hi u qu th c hi n d án c a bên liên quan t o b ng đánh giá đ theo dõi hi u qu th c hi n d án c a bên r t c n thi t Trong nghiên c u này, đ i t ng khu v c kh o sát n m Thành ph H Chí Minh Nghiên c u thu th p d li u đ đánh giá nguyên nhân gây nh h ng đ n hi u su t làm vi c c a bên d án xây d ng t i Vi t Nam Thông qua b ng câu h i kh o sát ch y phân tích s li u th ng kê đ xác đ nh x p h ng nhân t Sau ng d ng ph ng pháp Phân tích y u t khám phá (EFA) đ lo i b nhân t d th a nhóm l i nhóm nhân t gây nh h vi c gi a bên m t d án xây d ng Các nhóm đ ng t i hi u su t làm c k tên nh “Môi tr ng làm vi c”, “Chuyên môn t ch c c a ban Qu n lý d án”, “N ng l c thi công c a Nhà th u”, “S hi u bi t c a Ch u T ”, “N ng l c T v n-Thi t k ”, “S chuyên nghi p c a Nhà Cung c p” Bài nghiên c u c ng đ xu t xây d ng khung đánh giá đ theo dõi hi u su t làm vi c c a bên nh m có nh ng đ xu t u ch nh k p th i n u hi u qu th c hi n d án c a bên liên quan ch a t t Mơ hình n tính SEM c ng đ c ng d ng đ phân tích m i t ng quan gi a nhóm nhân t Trong đó, nhóm “các nhân t liên quan đ n Nhà cung c p” có tác đ ng m nh nh t t i hi u qu th c hi n c a bên liên quan Bài lu n v n đ xu t m t s g i ý cho nhóm nhân t này, nh m đ m b o ngu n hàng đ đ y đ , tránh gây nh h c cung ng k p th i ng đ n ti n đ d án chi phí phát sinh c ng nh đình tr cơng vi c c a bên liên quan khác vi AUTHOR’S COMMITMENT I take full responsibility for my research with all data collected, research results presented in this thesis, I guarantee that they are completely honest and have never been published in any other form or in any other research Ho Chi Minh City, August 29th 2022 Nguyen Thanh Minh vii Table of Contents THE TASK SHEET OF MASTER’S THESIS i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii ABSTRACT iv TÓM T T v AUTHOR’S COMMITMENT vi LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF TABLES xii LIST OF APPENDIX xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction 1.2 Problem Statement 1.3 Objectives of the Topic 1.4 Research Scope CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Definitions and Concepts 2.1.1 Definitions about Stakeholders in Construction Project 2.1.2 Definitions about Stakeholders Performance 2.1.3 Definitions about Evaluating Framework 2.2 Related Studies 2.2.1 Studies about Factors that affect Stakeholders Performance 2.2.2 Studies about Stakeholder Performance Criteria 10 2.3 Theoretical related to the Research 11 2.3.1 Fuzzy Set Theory 11 2.3.2 Analytical Hierarchy Process – AHP Method 13 viii 2.3.3 Fuzzy AHP Method 14 2.3.4 SEM approach 14 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 16 3.1 Research Process 16 3.2 Theories and Models 17 3.2.1 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) 17 3.2.2 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method 18 3.2.3 Research Model 21 3.3 Data Collection Phase 1: Determine Factors that influence Stakeholders Performance 22 3.3.1 Determine Factors that influence Stakeholders Performance and Stakeholders Performance Criteria 23 3.3.2 Create Questionnaire Survey 34 3.3.3 Data Collection Method 34 3.4 Data Collection Phase 2: Construct Pairwise Comparison Matrices 35 3.4.1 Create Pairwise Comparison Questionnaire Survey 35 3.4.2 Expert Selection 35 3.4.3 Data Collection Method 36 CHAPTER 4: FACTORS INFLUENCE STAKEHOLDERS PERFORMANCE 37 4.1 Descriptive Analysis and Rank Factors 37 4.1.1 Data Selection 37 4.1.2 Descriptive Statistics 38 4.1.3 Rank Factors 42 4.2 Factor Analysis 44 4.2.1 Cronbach’s Alpha 44 4.2.2 EFA 51 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy Expert II51 II52 II53 II54 II56 l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 10 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/9 1/8 11 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 12 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 13 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/8 1/7 1/6 14 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 15 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 16 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 17 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 18 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 0.15 0.17 0.21 0.19 0.23 0.32 0.22 0.3 0.42 0.2 0.26 0.34 3.56 4.63 5.67 Geo mean II61 II62 II63 II64 II65 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 10 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5 1/4 1/3 11 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/9 1/8 1/7 12 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 155 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy II61 II62 II63 II64 II65 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 13 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 14 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/5 1/4 1/3 15 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 16 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 17 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 18 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 0.13 0.15 0.18 0.19 0.23 0.32 0.14 0.16 0.2 0.18 0.22 0.3 0.18 0.22 0.28 Geo mean Appendix 7: Fuzzy Expert assessment for matrices S3 III12 III13 III14 III15 III21 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 4 1/4 1/3 1/2 2 4 9 1/4 1/3 1/2 3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 3 1/7 1/6 1/5 5 6 1/6 1/5 1/4 6 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 9 1/3 1/2 10 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 11 3 1/9 1/8 1/7 9 1/3 1/2 12 6 1/9 1/8 1/7 13 4 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 14 3 9 1/3 1/2 15 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 16 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 17 1/3 1/2 9 1/3 1/2 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 156 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy 18 Geo mean 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1.44 2.45 3.48 3.17 4.24 5.28 0.4 0.62 0.99 6.46 7.49 8.26 0.29 0.41 0.69 III23 III24 III25 III31 III32 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 9 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 10 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 11 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 12 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 13 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 14 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 15 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 16 1/7 1/6 1/5 9 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 17 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 18 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1.83 2.56 3.58 0.28 0.36 0.47 4.17 5.36 6.39 0.19 0.24 0.31 0.28 0.39 0.55 Geo mean III34 III35 III41 III42 III43 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1 1/3 1/2 1 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 157 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy III34 III35 III41 III42 III43 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 3 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 1 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/3 1/2 7 1/9 1/9 1/8 4 9 1/6 1/5 1/4 3 4 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/3 1/2 1/8 1/7 1/6 7 10 1/7 1/6 1/5 6 11 1/4 1/3 1/2 12 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/3 1/2 13 1/9 1/9 1/8 9 14 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 15 1/9 1/9 1/8 4 9 16 1/9 1/8 1/7 7 17 1/7 1/6 1/5 8 18 1/9 1/8 1/7 9 0.24 0.3 0.38 4.15 5.31 6.4 1.01 1.6 2.49 2.12 2.8 3.61 2.66 3.33 4.19 Geo mean III45 III51 III52 III53 III54 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 3 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 158 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/8 1/7 1/6 10 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/3 1/2 11 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 12 9 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/9 1/8 13 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 14 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 15 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 16 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/5 1/4 1/3 17 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/7 1/6 1/5 18 9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/9 1/8 4.23 5.29 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.19 0.24 0.16 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.24 0.33 Geo mean Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 159 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy Appendix 8: Fuzzy Expert assessment for matrices S4 IV12 IV13 IV14 IV21 IV23 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 5 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/4 5 1/5 1/4 1/3 8 3 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 10 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 11 4 1/4 1/3 1/2 12 4 1/4 1/3 1/2 13 5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 14 3 1/4 1/3 1/2 15 3 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 16 8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 17 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 18 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 2.58 3.69 4.76 3.21 4.41 5.51 0.26 0.36 0.49 0.21 0.27 0.39 3.08 4.2 5.26 Geo mean IV24 IV31 IV32 IV34 IV41 Expert l m u l m u l m u l m u l m u 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 160 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 3 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 10 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/8 1/7 1/6 11 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 12 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 13 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 14 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/3 1/2 15 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/4 16 1/3 1/2 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/9 1/8 1/7 17 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 18 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 0.25 0.34 0.54 0.18 0.23 0.31 0.19 0.24 0.32 0.31 0.45 0.61 2.03 2.78 3.82 Geo mean IV42 IV43 Expert l m u l m u 9 1/3 1/2 8 7 9 1/3 1/2 6 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 8 10 7 11 1/3 1/2 12 1/3 1/2 13 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 161 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy IV42 IV43 Expert l m u l m u 14 15 1/3 1/2 16 17 3 18 1/3 1/2 Geo mean 1.84 2.93 1.63 2.2 3.19 Appendix 9: Fuzzy Expert assessment for matrices S5 V12 V13 V21 Expert l m u l m u l m u 1/6 1/5 1/4 2 1/3 1/2 3 5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/7 1/6 1/5 3 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 7 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/5 1/4 1/3 10 1/8 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 11 6 1/6 1/5 1/4 12 5 1/5 1/4 1/3 13 1/4 1/3 1/2 4 14 1/3 1/2 15 6 1/6 1/5 1/4 16 1/9 1/8 1/7 17 1/6 1/5 1/4 18 1/7 1/6 1/5 Geo mean 2.588 3.569 4.541 1.997 2.631 3.323 0.22 0.28 0.386 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 162 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy V23 V31 V32 Expert l m u l m u l m u 1/3 1/2 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 4 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 5 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 10 1/3 1/2 11 1/3 1/2 1/7 1/6 1/5 12 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/6 1/5 1/4 13 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/4 1/3 1/2 14 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5 1/4 1/3 15 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/8 1/7 1/6 16 1/7 1/6 1/5 1/8 1/7 1/6 17 1/3 1/2 1/3 1/2 18 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/4 1/3 1/2 Geo mean 0.576 0.791 1.145 0.301 0.38 0.501 0.873 1.265 1.738 Appendix 10: Fuzzy Expert assessment for matrices S6 VI12 VI21 Expert l m u l m u 1 1/3 1/2 2 1/4 1/3 1/2 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/9 1/8 1/7 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 163 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy VI12 VI21 Expert l m u l m u 1/6 1/5 1/4 6 1/4 1/3 1/2 7 1/8 1/7 1/6 8 1/9 1/8 1/7 1/4 1/3 1/2 10 1/4 1/3 1/2 11 1/7 1/6 1/5 12 1/3 1/2 13 1/3 1/2 14 1/9 1/9 1/8 9 15 1/9 1/8 1/7 16 1/5 1/4 1/3 17 1/3 1/2 1 18 1/6 1/5 1/4 Geo mean 0.8110 1.0957 1.4445 0.6923 0.9126 1.2330 Appendix 11: Fuzzy Matrices S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S1 1 1.63 2.72 2.45 2.45 3.54 4.58 2.40 3.50 4.56 2.45 3.54 4.58 2.28 3.43 4.51 S2 0.27 0.37 0.61 1 0.31 0.43 0.63 2.16 3.16 4.14 2.01 3.11 4.16 1.89 2.95 3.97 S3 0.22 0.28 0.41 1.60 2.35 3.22 1 2.29 3.24 4.15 2.10 3.23 4.30 2.22 3.38 4.46 S4 0.22 0.29 0.42 0.24 0.32 0.46 0.24 0.31 0.44 1 1.50 2.58 3.63 2.44 3.51 4.55 S5 0.22 0.28 0.41 0.24 0.32 0.50 0.23 0.31 0.48 0.28 0.39 0.67 1 2.33 3.47 4.54 S6 0.22 0.29 0.44 0.25 0.34 0.53 0.22 0.30 0.45 0.22 0.28 0.41 0.22 0.29 0.43 1 Appendix 12: Interval Matrices S1 S11 S12 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 S13 S14 S15 S16 Page 164 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy S11 1 2.177 3.24 3.408 4.478 3.309 4.395 3.39 4.464 2.855 3.97 S12 0.32 0.49 1 0.368 0.526 2.975 3.953 2.23 3.307 2.528 3.58 S13 0.226 0.301 1.975 2.787 1 2.939 3.859 2.33 3.413 2.801 3.92 S14 0.231 0.311 0.257 0.346 0.263 0.349 1 1.98 3.049 2.976 4.03 S15 0.227 0.303 0.31 0.477 0.3 0.454 0.338 0.545 1 2.899 S16 0.257 0.365 0.285 0.414 0.26 0.373 0.252 0.347 0.25 0.359 1 Appendix 13: Interval Matrices S2 S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 S21 1 2.8 3.9 3.27 4.35 4.34 5.35 5.32 6.37 6.03 6.99 S22 0.26 0.37 1 0.52 0.77 3.56 4.67 3.72 4.84 3.7 4.77 S23 0.21 0.28 0.92 1.31 1 3.28 4.18 2.88 3.9 5.55 6.59 S24 0.19 0.23 0.22 0.29 0.24 0.31 1 3.4 4.42 3.9 5.01 S25 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.28 0.26 0.36 0.23 0.3 1 4.1 5.15 S26 0.14 0.17 0.21 0.28 0.15 0.18 0.2 0.26 0.2 0.25 1 Appendix 14: Interval Matrices S3 S31 S32 S33 S34 S35 S31 1 1.95 2.97 3.71 4.76 0.51 0.81 6.97 7.87 S32 0.35 0.55 1 2.2 3.07 0.32 0.41 4.77 5.88 S33 0.21 0.28 0.33 0.47 1 0.27 0.34 4.73 5.86 S34 1.31 2.05 2.46 3.2 2.99 3.76 1 3.62 4.76 S35 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.21 0.17 0.21 0.21 0.28 1 Appendix 15: Interval Matrices S4 S41 S42 S43 S44 S41 1 3.14 4.23 3.81 4.96 0.31 0.43 S42 0.24 0.33 1 3.64 4.73 0.3 0.44 S43 0.2 0.27 0.21 0.28 1 0.38 0.53 S44 2.4 3.3 2.38 3.47 1.92 2.7 1 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 165 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy Appendix 16: Interval Matrices S5 S51 S52 S53 S51 1 3.079 4.055 2.314 2.977 S52 0.25 0.333 1 0.683 0.968 S53 0.341 0.44 1.069 1.501 1 Appendix 17: Interval Matrices S6 S1 S2 S1 1 0.953 1.270 S2 0.802 1.073 1 Appendix 18: Defuzzification Matrices S S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S1 1.00 2.71 3.94 3.85 3.93 3.41 S2 0.40 1.00 0.45 3.46 2.77 3.06 S3 0.26 2.38 1.00 3.40 2.87 3.36 S4 0.27 0.30 0.31 1.00 2.52 3.50 S5 0.26 0.39 0.38 0.44 1.00 3.45 S6 0.31 0.35 0.32 0.30 0.31 1.00 Appendix 19: Defuzzification Matrices S1 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S11 1.00 2.03 2.83 3.72 5.40 5.85 7.06 7.35 8.27 S12 0.56 1.00 2.74 5.31 5.29 3.30 4.07 6.75 7.22 S13 0.37 0.38 1.00 2.60 3.53 4.05 5.24 5.96 8.06 S14 0.28 0.19 0.43 1.00 3.27 5.07 5.49 4.72 7.77 S15 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.32 1.00 4.41 4.24 5.28 6.84 S16 0.17 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.23 1.00 2.39 6.05 6.76 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 166 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy S17 0.14 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.47 1.00 4.33 5.97 S18 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.24 1.00 6.05 S19 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.17 0.17 1.00 Appendix 20: Defuzzification Matrices S2 S21 S22 S23 S24 S25 S26 S21 1.00 3.35 3.81 4.85 5.85 6.51 S22 0.32 1.00 0.64 4.12 4.28 4.23 S23 0.24 1.12 1.00 3.73 3.39 6.07 S24 0.21 0.25 0.28 1.00 3.91 4.45 S25 0.17 0.24 0.31 0.27 1.00 4.62 S26 0.16 0.24 0.17 0.23 0.22 1.00 Appendix 21: Defuzzification Matrices S3 S31 S32 S33 S34 S35 S31 1.00 2.46 4.23 0.66 7.42 S32 0.45 1.00 2.63 0.37 5.32 S33 0.24 0.40 1.00 0.30 5.29 S34 1.68 2.83 3.37 1.00 4.19 S35 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.25 1.00 Appendix 22: Defuzzification Matrices S4 S41 S42 S43 S44 S41 1.00 3.68 4.39 0.37 S42 0.28 1.00 4.19 0.37 S43 0.24 0.25 1.00 0.46 S44 2.85 2.92 2.31 1.00 Appendix 23: Defuzzification Matrices S5 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 167 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy S51 S52 S53 S51 1.00 3.57 2.65 S52 0.29 1.00 0.83 S53 0.39 1.29 1.00 Appendix 24: Defuzzification Matrices S6 S61 S62 S61 1.00 1.11 S62 0.94 1.00 Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 168 of 185 Instructor: Dr Nguyen Thanh Viet and Dr Do Tien Sy PROFILE Full name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Date of birth: 13/03/1996 Place of birth: Nghe An Address: An Khang Apartment, An Phu Ward, Thu Duc City, Ho Chi Minh City Phone number: 0913273083 Email: minhnt.uah@gmail.com TRAINING PROCESS 2014-2019: Student of University of Architecture HCMC, major Civil Engineering 2020-2022: Student of Bach Khoa University Ho Chi Minh City WORKING PROCESS 2019-2021: Cilvil Engineer at Khanh Phat construction company (KPCons) Student Name: Nguyen Thanh Minh Student ID: 2070688 Page 169 of 185 ... Litigation performance" Roshana Takim, Akintola Akintoye (2002) "Performance indicators for successful construction project Client's Satisfaction performance" Roshana Takim, Akintola Akintoye (2002) "Performance. .. manifest variables It is an advanced application of factor analysis and regression analysis They are being analyzed in simultaneously for theory testing SEM may also be used as an advanced statistical... from a study of Roshana Takim and Akintola Akintoye (2002), ? ?Performance indicators for successful construction project performance? ?? 3.3.1 Determine Factors that influence Stakeholders Performance

Ngày đăng: 13/10/2022, 07:50

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan