Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 230 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
230
Dung lượng
4,19 MB
Nội dung
W. David Montgomery
Senior Vice President
NERA Economic Consulting
1255 23rd Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20037
Tel: 202-466-9294 Fax: 202-466-3605
w.david.Montgomery@NERA.com
www.nera.com
Office of Fossil Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
December 3, 2012
Attn: DeputyAssistantSecretaryChristopherSmith
Dear Mr. Smith
I am transmitting with this letter a clean copy of NERA’s report on the macroeconomic impacts of
LNG exports from the United States that was contracted for by the Department of Energy.
Sincerely,
W. David Montgomery
Senior Vice President
Enclosure
document8
This page intentionally left blank
Macroeconomic Impacts of LNG
Exports from the United States
Project Team
1
W. David Montgomery, NERA Economic Consulting (Project Leader)
Robert Baron, NERA Economic Consulting
Paul Bernstein, NERA Economic Consulting
Sugandha D. Tuladhar, NERA Economic Consulting
Shirley Xiong, NERA Economic Consulting
Mei Yuan, NERA Economic Consulting
NERA Economic Consulting
1255 23rd Street NW
Washington, DC 20037
Tel: +1 202 466 3510
Fax: +1 202 466 3605
www.nera.com
1
The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of NERA Economic Consulting or any
other NERA consultant.
NERA Economic Consulting
i
Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
I. SUMMARY 3
A. What NERA Was Asked to Do 3
B. Key Assumptions 5
C. Key Results 6
II. INTRODUCTION 13
A. Statement of the Problem 13
B. Scope of NERA and EIA Study 14
C. Organization of the Report 15
III. DESCRIPTION OF WORLDWIDE NATURAL GAS MARKETS and NERA’s
ANALYTICAL MODELS 16
A. Natural Gas Market Description 16
B. NERA’s Global Natural Gas Model 20
C. N
ew
ERA Macroeconomic Model 20
IV. DESCRIPTION OF SCENARIOS 23
A. How Worldwide Scenarios and U.S. Scenarios Were Designed 23
B. Matrix of U.S. Scenarios 26
C. Matrix of Worldwide Natural Gas Scenarios 27
V. GLOBAL NATURAL GAS MODEL RESULTS 29
A. NERA Worldwide Supply and Demand Baseline 29
B. Behavior of Market Participants 33
C. Available LNG Liquefaction and Shipping Capacity 35
D. The Effects of U.S. LNG Exports on Regional Natural Gas Markets 35
E. Under What Conditions Would the U.S. Export LNG? 37
F. Findings and Scenarios Chosen for N
ew
ERA Model 45
VI. U.S. ECONOMIC IMPACTS FROM N
ew
Era 47
A. Organization of the Findings 47
B. Natural Gas Market Impacts 48
C. Macroeconomic Impacts 55
D. Impacts on Energy-Intensive Sectors 64
E. Sensitivities 70
VII. CONCLUSIONS 76
NERA Economic Consulting
ii
A. LNG Exports Are Only Feasible under Scenarios with High International Demand
and/or Low U.S. Costs of Production 76
B. U.S. Natural Gas Prices Do Not Rise to World Prices 76
C. Consumer Well-being Improves in All Scenarios 76
D. There Are Net Benefits to the U.S. 77
E. There Is a Shift in Resource Income between Economic Sectors 77
APPENDIX A - TABLES OF ASSUMPTIONS AND NON-PROPRIETARY INPUT
DATA FOR GLOBAL NATURAL GAS MODEL 79
A. Region Assignment 79
B. EIA IEO 2011 Natural Gas Production and Consumption 80
C. Pricing Mechanisms in Each Region 81
D. Cost to Move Natural Gas via Pipelines 84
E. LNG Infrastructures and Associated Costs 84
F. Elasticity 90
G. Adders from Model Calibration 91
H. Scenario Specifications 93
APPENDIX B – DESCRIPTION OF MODELS 95
A. Global Natural Gas Model 95
B. N
ew
ERA Model 102
APPENDIX C – TABLES AND MODEL RESULTS 113
A. Global Natural Gas Model 113
B. N
ew
ERA Model Results 178
APPENDIX D - COMPARISON WITH EIA STUDY 200
APPENDIX E - FACTORS THAT WE DID NOT INCLUDE IN THE ANALYSIS 210
A. How Will Overbuilding of Export Capacity Affect the Market 210
B. Engineering or Infrastructure Limits on How Fast U.S. Liquefaction Capacity Could
Be Built 210
C. Where Production or Export Terminals Will Be Located 210
D. Regional Economic Impacts 210
E. Effects on Different Socioeconomic Groups 211
F. Implications of Foreign Direct Investment in Facilities or Gas Production 211
APPENDIX F – COMPLETE STATEMENT OF WORK 212
NERA Economic Consulting
iii
Table of Figures
Figure 1: Feasible Scenarios Analyzed in the Macroeconomic Model 4
Figure 2: Percentage Change in Welfare (%) 7
Figure 3: Change in Income Components and Total GDP in USREF_SD_HR (Billions of 2010$)
8
Figure 4: Change in Total Wage Income by Industry in 2015 (%) 9
Figure 5: NERA Export Volumes (Tcf) 10
Figure 6: Prices and Export Levels in Representative Scenarios for Year 2035 11
Figure 7: Comparison of EIA and NERA Maximum Wellhead Price Increases 11
Figure 8: Global Natural Gas Demand and Production (Tcf) 16
Figure 9: Regional Groupings for the Global Natural Gas Model 17
Figure 10: 2010 LNG Trade (Tcf) 19
Figure 11: International Scenarios 23
Figure 12: Matrix of U.S. Scenarios 27
Figure 13: Tree of All 63 Scenarios 28
Figure 14: Baseline Natural Gas Production (Tcf) 30
Figure 15: Baseline Natural Gas Demand (Tcf) 30
Figure 16: Projected Wellhead Prices (2010$/MMBtu) 32
Figure 17: Projected City Gate Prices (2010$/MMBtu) 32
Figure 18: Baseline Inter-Region Pipeline Flows (Tcf) 33
Figure 19: Baseline LNG Exports (Tcf) 33
Figure 20: Baseline LNG Imports (Tcf) 33
Figure 21: U.S. LNG Export Capacity Limits (Tcf) 38
Figure 22: U.S. LNG Exports –U.S. Reference (Tcf) 38
Figure 23: U.S. LNG Export – High Shale EUR (Tcf) 40
Figure 24: U.S. LNG Export – Low Shale EUR (Tcf) 41
Figure 25: U.S. LNG Exports in 2025 Under Different Assumptions 43
Figure 26: Scenario Tree with Maximum Feasible Export Levels Highlighted in Blue and N
ew
Era
Scenarios Circled 45
Figure 27: Historical and Projected Wellhead Natural Gas Price Paths 48
Figure 28: Wellhead Natural Gas Price and Percentage Change for NERA Core Scenarios 50
Figure 29: Change in Natural Gas Price Relative to the Corresponding Baseline of Zero LNG
Exports (2010$/Mcf) 51
NERA Economic Consulting
iv
Figure 30: Natural Gas Production and Percentage Change for NERA Core Scenarios 52
Figure 31: Change in Natural Gas Production Relative to the Corresponding Baseline (Tcf) 53
Figure 32: Natural Gas Demand and Percent Change for NERA Core Scenarios 54
Figure 33: Percentage Change in Welfare for NERA Core Scenarios 56
Figure 34: Percentage Change in GDP for NERA Core Scenarios 57
Figure 35: Percentage Change in Consumption for NERA Core Scenarios 58
Figure 36: Percentage Change in Investment for NERA Core Scenarios 59
Figure 37: Average Annual Increase in Natural Gas Export Revenues 60
Figure 38: Minimum and Maximum Output Changes for Some Key Economic Sectors 61
Figure 39: Percentage Change in 2015 Sectoral Wage Income 62
Figure 40: Changes in Subcomponents of GDP in 2020 and 2035 63
Figure 41: Percentage Change in EIS Output for NERA Core Scenarios 65
Figure 42: Percentage Change in 2015 Energy Intensive Sector Wage Income for NERA Core
Scenarios 66
Figure 43: Interagency Report (Figure 1) 68
Figure 44: Energy Intensity of Industries "Presumptively Eligible" for Assistance under
Waxman-Markey 69
Figure 45: Quota Price (2010$/Mcf) 71
Figure 46: Quota Rents (Billions of 2010$) 72
Figure 47: Total Lost Values 73
Figure 48: Change in Welfare with Different Quota Rents 74
Figure 49: Macroeconomic Impacts for the High EUR – High/Rapid and Low/Slowest Scenario
Sensitivities 75
Figure 50: Global Natural Gas Model Region Assignments 79
Figure 51: EIA IEO 2011 Natural Gas Production (Tcf) 80
Figure 52: EIA IEO 2011 Natural Gas Consumption (Tcf) 80
Figure 53: Projected Wellhead Prices ($/MMBtu) 83
Figure 54: Projected City Gate Prices ($/MMBtu) 83
Figure 55: Cost to Move Natural Gas through Intra- or Inter-Regional Pipelines ($/MMBtu) 84
Figure 56: Liquefaction Plants Investment Cost by Region ($millions/ MMTPA Capacity) 85
Figure 57: Liquefaction Costs per MMBtu by Region, 2010-2035 86
Figure 58: Regasification Costs per MMBtu by Region 2010-2035 87
Figure 59: 2010 Shipping Rates ($/MMBtu) 88
NERA Economic Consulting
v
Figure 60: Costs to Move Natural Gas from Wellheads to Liquefaction Plants through Pipelines
($/MMBtu) 89
Figure 61: Costs to Move Natural Gas from Regasification Plants to City Gates through Pipelines
($/MMBtu) 89
Figure 62: Total LNG Transport Cost, 2015 ($/MMBtu) 90
Figure 63: Regional Supply Elasticity 90
Figure 64: Regional Demand Elasticity 91
Figure 65: Pipeline Cost Adders ($/MMBtu) 91
Figure 66: LNG Cost Adders Applied to Shipping Routes ($/MMBtu) 92
Figure 67: Domestic Scenario Conditions 93
Figure 68: Incremental Worldwide Natural Gas Demand under Two International Scenarios (in
Tcf of Natural Gas Equivalents) 94
Figure 69: Scenario Export Capacity (Tcf) 94
Figure 70: Map of the Twelve Regions in the GNGM 97
Figure 71: Natural Gas Transport Options 99
Figure 72: Circular Flow of Income 103
Figure 73: N
ew
ERA Macroeconomic Regions 104
Figure 74: N
ew
ERA Sectoral Representation 105
Figure 75: N
ew
ERA Household Representation 106
Figure 76: N
ew
ERA Electricity Sector Representation 107
Figure 77: N
ew
ERA Trucking and Commercial Transportation Sector Representation 108
Figure 78: N
ew
ERA Other Production Sector Representation 108
Figure 79: N
ew
ERA Resource Sector Representation 109
Figure 80: Scenario Tree with Feasible Cases Highlighted 114
Figure 81: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_NX 115
Figure 82: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_LSS 116
Figure 83: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_LS 117
Figure 84: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_LR 118
Figure 85: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_HS 119
Figure 86: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_HR 120
Figure 87: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_INTREF_NC 121
Figure 88: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_NX 122
Figure 89: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_LSS 123
NERA Economic Consulting
vi
Figure 90: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_LS 124
Figure 91: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_LR 125
Figure 92: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_HS 126
Figure 93: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_HR 127
Figure 94: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_D_NC 128
Figure 95: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_NX 129
Figure 96: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_LSS 130
Figure 97: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_LS 131
Figure 98: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_LR 132
Figure 99: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_HS 133
Figure 100: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_HR 134
Figure 101: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, USREF_SD_NC 135
Figure 102: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_NX 136
Figure 103: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_LSS 137
Figure 104: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_LS 138
Figure 105: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_LR 139
Figure 106: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_HS 140
Figure 107: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_HR 141
Figure 108: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_INTREF_NC 142
Figure 109: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_NX 143
Figure 110: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_LSS 144
Figure 111: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_LS 145
Figure 112: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_LR 146
Figure 113: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_HS 147
Figure 114: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_HR 148
Figure 115: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_D_NC 149
Figure 116: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_NX 150
Figure 117: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_LSS 151
Figure 118: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_LS 152
Figure 119: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_LR 153
Figure 120: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_HS 154
Figure 121: Detailed Results from Global Natural Gas Model, HEUR_SD_HR 155
. SW
Washington, DC 20585
December 3, 2012
Attn: Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Smith
Dear Mr. Smith
I am transmitting with this letter a clean