a GAOUnitedStatesGovernmentAccountabilityOfficeReporttotheSecretaryofthe Treasury November2005 FINANCIAL AUDIT Bureau ofthe Public Debt’s Fiscal Years 2005 and 2004 Schedules of Federal Debt GAO-06-169 This is trial version www.adultpdf.com What GAO Found UnitedStatesGovernmentAccountabilityOffice Why GAO Did This Study Highlights Accountability Integrity Reliability November2005 FINANCIAL AUDIT Bureau ofthe Public Debt’s Fiscal Years 2005 and 2004 Schedules of Federal Debt Highlights of GAO-06-169, a reporttotheSecretaryofthe Treasury GAO is required to audit the consolidated financial statements ofthe U.S. government. Due tothe significance ofthe federal debt held by the public tothe governmentwide financial statements, GAO has also been auditing the Bureau ofthe Public Debt’s (BPD) Schedules of Federal Debt annually. The audit of these schedules is done to determine whether, in all material respects, (1) the schedules are reliable and (2) BPD management maintained effective internal control relevant tothe Schedule of Federal Debt. Further, we test compliance with selected provisions of significant laws related tothe Schedule of Federal Debt. Federal debt managed by BPD consists of Treasury securities held by the public and by certain federal government accounts, referred to as intragovernmental debt holdings. The level of debt held by the public reflects how much ofthe nation’s wealth has been absorbed by the federal governmentto finance prior federal spending in excess of federal revenues. Intragovernmental debt holdings represent balances of Treasury securities held by federal government accounts, primarily federal trust funds such as Social Security, that typically have an obligation to invest their excess annual receipts over disbursements in federal securities. In GAO’s opinion, BPD’s Schedules of Federal Debt for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 were fairly presented in all material respects and BPD maintained effective internal control related tothe Schedule of Federal Debt as of September 30, 2005.GAO also found no instances of noncompliance in fiscal year 2005 with selected provisions ofthe statutory debt limit and debt issuance suspension period laws we tested. As of September 30, 2005 and 2004, federal debt managed by BPD totaled about $7,918 billion and $7,379 billion, respectively. At the end of fiscal year 2005, debt held by the public as a percentage ofthe U.S. economy is estimated at 37.5 percent, compared to 33.0 percent at the end of fiscal year 2001. Further, certain trust funds (e.g., Social Security) continue to run surpluses, resulting in increased intragovernmental debt holdings. These debt holdings are backed by the full faith and credit ofthe U.S. government and represent a priority call on future budgetary resources. As a result, total gross federal debt has increased 37 percent between the end of fiscal years 2001 and 2005. During fiscal year 2005, a debt issuance suspension period was invoked to avoid breaching the statutory debt limit. On November 19, 2004, legislation was enacted to raise the debt limit by $800 billion to $8,184 billion. As shown below, total federal debt increased over each ofthe last 4 fiscal years. Debt held by the public increased during this 4-year period primarily as a result of annual unified budget deficits. Intragovernmental debt holdings steadily increased during this 4-year period primarily due to excess receipts over disbursements in federal trust funds. $3,339 $2,453 $3,553 $2,660 $3,924 $2,859 $4,307 $3,072 $4,601 $3,317 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 As of September 30 Total Gross Federal Debt Outstanding (in billions) Held by the Public Intragovernmental Debt Holdings Figure 1 $5,792 $6,213 $6,783 $7,379 $7,918 Source: BPD. www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-169. For a fuller understanding of GAO’s opinion on BPD’s fiscal years 2005 and 2004 Schedules of Federal Debt, readers should refer tothe complete audit report, available by clicking the link above, which includes information on audit objectives, scope, and methodology. For more information, contact Gary T. Engel at (202) 512-3406 or engelg@gao.gov . This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page i GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt Contents Letter 1 Auditor’s Report 9 Opinion on Schedules of Federal Debt 10 Opinion on Internal Control 10 Compliance with Laws and Regulations 10 Consistency of Other Information 11 Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 11 Agency Comments 13 Overview, Schedules, and Notes 14 Overview on Federal Debt Managed by the Bureau ofthe Public Debt 14 Schedules of Federal Debt 24 Notes tothe Schedules of Federal Debt 25 Appendixes Appendix I: Comments from the Bureau ofthe Public Debt 30 Appendix II: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 31 Abbreviations BPD Bureau ofthe Public Debt GDP gross domestic product OMB Officeof Management and Budget TIPS Treasury Inflation Protected Securities This is a work ofthe U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in theUnited States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 1 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt UnitedStatesGovernmentAccountabilityOffice Washington, D.C. 20548 Comptroller General oftheUnitedStates A November 7, 2005 Letter The Honorable John W. Snow TheSecretaryofthe Treasury Dear Mr. Secretary: The accompanying auditor’s report presents the results of our audits ofthe Schedules of Federal Debt Managed by the Bureau ofthe Public Debt for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. The Schedules of Federal Debt present the beginning balances, increases and decreases, and ending balances for (1) Federal Debt Held by the Public and Intragovernmental Debt Holdings, (2) the related Accrued Interest Payables, and (3) the related Net Unamortized Premiums and Discounts managed by the bureau. 1 The auditor’s report contains our (1) opinion on the Schedules of Federal Debt for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, (2) opinion on the effectiveness of related internal control as of September 30, 2005, (3) conclusion on the bureau's compliance in fiscal year 2005 with selected provisions of laws we tested, and (4) conclusion on the consistency between information in the Schedules of Federal Debt and the accompanying Overview on Federal Debt Managed by the Bureau ofthe Public Debt. As of September 30, 2005 and 2004, federal debt managed by the bureau totaled about $7,918 billion and $7,379 billion, respectively, for moneys borrowed to fund the federal government’s operations. As shown on the Schedules of Federal Debt, these balances consisted of approximately (1) $4,601 billion as of September 30, 2005, and $4,307 billion as of September 30, 2004, of debt held by the public and about (2) $3,317 billion as of September 30, 2005, and $3,072 billion as of September 30, 2004, of intragovernmental debt holdings. The level of debt held by the public reflects how much ofthe nation’s wealth has been absorbed by the federal governmentto finance prior federal spending in excess of federal revenues. It best represents the cumulative effect of past federal borrowing on today’s economy and the 1 Intragovernmental Debt Holdings represent federal debt issued by Treasury and held by certain federal government accounts, such as the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 2 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt federal budget. To finance a cash deficit, the federal government borrows from the public. When a cash surplus occurs, the annual excess funds can then be used to reduce debt held by the public. In other words, annual cash deficits or surpluses generally approximate the annual net change in the amount of federal government borrowing from the public. Cash surpluses during fiscal years 1998 through 2001 enabled Treasury to reduce debt held by the public by $476 billion, from $3,815 billion as of September 30, 1997, to $3,339 billion as of September 30, 2001. Treasury reduced this debt by redeeming maturing debt, reducing the number of auctions and size of new debt issues, conducting “buybacks” of debt before its maturity date, and redeeming callable securities when the opportunities arose. 2 However, because ofthe return to deficits, in fiscal years 2002 through 2005, debt held by the public increased by $1,262 billion, with about $294 billion of this increase occurring in fiscal year 2005. Treasury issued more debt by increasing the number of auctions and the size of new debt issues. During fiscal year 2003, Treasury reintroduced the 3-year note, which will be offered every quarter. In addition, Treasury increased the offerings ofthe 5-year note from quarterly to monthly; the 10-year note from an offering every quarter to eight offerings a year; and the 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) from three offerings a year to an offering every quarter. During fiscal year 2004, Treasury introduced a 20-year TIPS, first issued on July 30, 2004, and a 5-year TIPS, first issued on October 29, 2004. Both securities will be offered semiannually. During fiscal year 2005, Treasury announced the reintroduction ofthe 30-year bond, which was suspended in October 2001. The 30-year bond will be issued semi-annually with the first issuance to be on February 15, 2006. Notwithstanding the increases in fiscal years 2002 through 2005, debt held by the public as a percentage of total federal debt has decreased from approximately 71 percent as of September 30, 1997, the first year the Schedule of Federal Debt was audited, to approximately 58 percent as of September 30, 2005. Intragovernmental debt holdings represent balances of Treasury securities held by federal government accounts, primarily federal trust funds, that typically have an obligation to invest their excess annual receipts over disbursements in federal securities. Most federal trust funds invest in special U.S. Treasury securities that are guaranteed for principal and interest by the full faith and credit ofthe U.S. government. These securities 2 During this period, Treasury eliminated the 3-year note and the 52-week bill. This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 3 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt are nonmarketable; however, they represent a priority call on future budgetary resources. Certain of these trust funds, such as the Social Security and federal civilian employee retirement trust funds, have been running cash surpluses, which are loaned tothe Treasury and reduce the current need for the federal governmentto borrow from the public in order to finance current operations. As a result of total trust fund surpluses, intragovernmental debt holdings have increased by approximately $1,734 billion during fiscal years 1998 through 2005, from $1,583 billion as of September 30, 1997, to $3,317 billion as of September 30, 2005, with about $245 billion of this increase occurring in fiscal year 2005. Intragovernmental debt holdings as a percentage of total federal debt have increased from approximately 29 percent as of September 30, 1997, to approximately 42 percent as of September 30, 2005.The transactions relating tothe use ofthe federal government accounts’ surpluses net out on the federal government’s consolidated financial statements because, in effect, they represent loans from one part ofthe federal governmentto another. Importantly, these intragovernmental debt holdings also constitute future obligations ofthe Treasury since the Treasury must provide cash to redeem these securities in order for the individual accounts to pay their benefits or other obligations as they come due. When this occurs, if sufficient cash surpluses are not available to redeem the securities, the federal government would either need to increase borrowing from the public, raise future taxes, reduce future spending, retire less debt (if the budget as a whole is in surplus), or some combination thereof. It also should be noted that the surpluses in the federal government accounts could have served to reduce interest rates on the debt held by the public as compared to what the rates might have been had these surpluses not been available. While both are important, debt held by the public and intragovernmental debt holdings are very different. Debt held by the public approximates the federal government’s competition with other sectors in the credit markets. Federal borrowing absorbs resources available for private investment and may put upward pressure on interest rates. In addition, interest on debt held by the public is paid in cash and represents a burden on current taxpayers. It reflects the amount the federal government pays to its outside creditors. In contrast, intragovernmental debt holdings perform an accounting function but typically do not require cash payments from the current budget or represent a burden on the current economy. In addition, from the perspective ofthe budget as a whole, interest payments to federal government accounts by the Treasury are entirely offset by the income This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 4 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt received by such accounts—in effect, one part ofthe federal government pays the interest and another part receives it. This intragovernmental debt and the interest on it represents a claim on future resources and hence a burden on future taxpayers and the future economy when it has to be redeemed to meet obligations under the respective programs. However, these intragovernmental debt holdings do not fully reflect the federal government’s total future commitment to trust fund financed programs. They primarily represent the cumulative historical surpluses of those trust funds and also reflect future priority claims on the U.S. Treasury. They do not have the current economic effects of borrowing from the public and do not currently compete with the private sector for available funds in the credit markets. However, when trust funds redeem Treasury securities to obtain cash to fund expenditures, and Treasury borrows from the public to finance these redemptions, there is competition with the private sector and thus an effect on the economy. During fiscal year 2005, Treasury faced the challenge of managing the debt within the statutory debt limit. On October 14, 2004, Treasury entered into a debt issuance suspension period. A debt issuance suspension period is any period for which theSecretaryofthe Treasury has determined that obligations oftheUnitedStates may not be issued without exceeding the debt limit. 3 Actions taken by Treasury, which were consistent with legal authorities provided tothe Secretary, included suspending investment of receipts oftheGovernment Securities Investment Fund (G-Fund) ofthe federal employees' Thrift Savings Plan, the Exchange Stabilization Fund, and the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Trust Fund (Civil Service fund); redeeming Civil Service fund securities early; suspending the sales of State and Local Government Series nonmarketable Treasury securities; exchanging Treasury securities for Federal Financing Bank securities; and postponing an auction of Treasury bills. On November 19, 2004, legislation was enacted to raise the statutory debt limit by $800 billion to $8,184 billion. 4 Subsequently, Treasury restored all losses tothe G-Fund and Civil Service fund in accordance with legal authorities provided totheSecretaryofthe Treasury. During our audits, we have noted certain trends—the increase in the amount of Treasury securities held by foreign and international investors 3 5 U.S.C. §§ 8348(j)(5)(B), 8438(g)(6)(B). 4 Pub. L. No. 108-415, §1, 118 Stat. 2337 (Nov. 19, 2004). This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 5 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt and the increased costs to finance the federal government’s growing debt. Foreign and international investors are a major holder of debt held by the public. Over the last 3 years, foreign and international holdings have significantly increased. According to amounts reported in the September 2005 Treasury Bulletin, Treasury estimates that the amount of Treasury securities held by foreign and international investors has increased from about $1,135 billion as of June 30, 2002, to $2,030 billion as of June 30, 2005, or $895 billion. As of June 30, 2005, this represents an estimated 45 percent of total debt held by the public. During the same 3-year period, debt held by the public increased by $1,064 billion, from about $3,464 billion to $4,528 billion. Based on amounts reported in the September 2005 Treasury Bulletin, the estimated increase in holdings by foreign and international investors represents about 84 percent ofthe increase in debt held by the public over the same period. TheUnitedStates benefits from foreign purchases of Treasury securities because foreign investors fill part ofthe U.S. government’s borrowing needs. However, to service this foreign-held debt, the U.S. government must send interest payments abroad, which adds tothe incomes of residents of other countries rather than tothe incomes of U.S. residents. In addition, this increasing reliance on foreign investors to finance the deficits ofthe U.S. government presents a potential risk tothe U.S. economy, especially since the U.S. gross national saving rate is low by U.S. historical standards and averages well below that of other major industrialized nations. Rising interest rates on Treasury securities—although relatively low by historical standards—are contributing to an increased cost to finance the federal government’s growing debt. The interest rate for 13-week Treasury bills increased from a low of 1.68 percent during fiscal year 2005to 3.44 percent as of September 29, 2005. Also during fiscal year 2005, the interest rate on 2-year Treasury notes increased from a low of 2.50 percent as ofNovember 1, 2004, to 4.00 percent as of September 30, 2005. About $2,130 billion, or 46 percent, of marketable Treasury securities held by the public as of September 30, 2005, will mature at least once during the next 2 years. The Congressional Budget Office projects that interest rates on Treasury securities, especially short-term rates, will continue to increase. As such, as the Treasury securities mature over the next 2 years and are replaced by new debt, the interest rates on the majority ofthe new issuances will likely be higher than the September 30, 2005, rates and result in continued increased cost to finance the federal government’s debt. Thus, the combined effect of greater levels of debt and higher interest rates will likely place increasing pressure on the federal budget in the years ahead. This is trial version www.adultpdf.com Page 6 GAO-06-169 Schedules of Federal Debt The challenge of managing the federal debt is not likely to diminish any time soon. Debt held by the public continues to grow at a faster pace than the economy. At the end of fiscal year 2005, debt held by the public as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) is estimated at 37.5 percent, compared to 33.0 percent at the end of fiscal year 2001—the lowest ratio since 1983. In addition, gross federal debt has increased 37 percent during the same period, from $5,792 billion as of September 30, 2001, to $7,918 billion as of September 30, 2005. Further, interest on debt held by the public grew more rapidly than any other major spending category in 2005, rising 14 percent above the 2004 level. While growth in the debt held by the public-to-GDP measure does not necessarily create problems in the short term, continued growth in the long term would reduce budgetary flexibility and ultimately lead to an unsustainable fiscal path. In fact, GAO’s long-range fiscal policy simulations show that the nation’s current fiscal condition is but a prelude to a much more daunting long-term fiscal challenge. 5 The pending retirement ofthe Baby Boom generation and rising health care costs will place unprecedented and long-lasting stress on the federal budget, raising debt held by the public to unprecedented levels as a share of GDP. These projected trends are compounded by the presence of near-term deficits that have arisen from new discretionary and mandatory spending as well as lower revenues as a share ofthe economy. Absent significant changes on the spending and/or revenue sides ofthe budget, these long-term deficits will encumber a growing share of federal resources and test the capacity of current and future generations to afford both today’s and tomorrow’s commitments. Continuing on this unsustainable path will gradually erode, if not suddenly damage, our economy, our standard of living and ultimately our national security. As discussed earlier, federal debt managed by the bureau totaled about $7.9 trillion at the end ofthe fiscal year, or more than $26,000 for every man, woman, and child in this country today. But that number excludes many items, including the gap between future promised and funded Social Security and Medicare benefits, veterans’ health care, and a range of other commitments and contingencies that the federal government has pledged to support. If these items are factored in, the present value ofthe total burden is about $46 trillion. Stated differently, the total burden for every American is more than $150,000—and every day that burden becomes 5 See GAO, Our Nation's Fiscal Outlook: The Federal Government's Long-Term Budget Imbalance, http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/longterm. This is trial version www.adultpdf.com . a GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Secretary of the Treasury November 2005 FINANCIAL AUDIT Bureau of the Public Debt’s Fiscal Years 2005 and 2004 Schedules of. Accountability Office Washington, D.C. 20548 Comptroller General of the United States A November 7, 2005 Letter The Honorable John W. Snow The Secretary of the Treasury Dear Mr. Secretary: The. Reliability November 2005 FINANCIAL AUDIT Bureau of the Public Debt’s Fiscal Years 2005 and 2004 Schedules of Federal Debt Highlights of GAO- 06-169, a report to the Secretary of the Treasury GAO is required to