Báo cáo khoa học: Fluorescence quenching and kinetic studies of conformational changes induced by DNA and cAMP binding to cAMP receptor protein from Escherichia coli ppt
Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 14 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
14
Dung lượng
413,59 KB
Nội dung
Fluorescencequenchingandkineticstudies of
conformational changesinducedbyDNAand cAMP
binding tocAMPreceptorproteinfromEscherichia coli
Magdalena Tworzydło, Agnieszka Polit, Jan Mikołajczak and Zygmunt Wasylewski
Department of Physical Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krako
´
w, Poland
Cyclic AMP receptorprotein (CRP), allosterically
activated by cAMP, is a multipotent transcription
regulating protein engaged in the control of more
then 100 genes in Escherichiacoli [1,2]. The protein is
a homodimer. Each subunit consists of 209 amino
acid residues folded into two distinct domains. The
N-terminal domain, composed of amino acid residues
1–133, contains a cAMP-binding pocket that binds
the cAMP in the anti conformation. The N-terminal
domain is coupled with the C-terminal domain by a
flexible hinge region made up of residues 134–138.
The smaller, C-terminal domain possesses amino acid
residues 139–209 and contains the helix-turn-helix
(HTH) motif. The crystal structure of the CRP–DNA
complex revealed the existence of a second site
between the hinge and the turn of the HTH where
cAMP is bound in the syn conformation [3]. Upon
cAMP binding in the anti conformation, CRP under-
goes allosteric conformationalchanges that enable the
protein to recognize specific DNA sequences [2,4].
Therefore, it has been suggested that CRP can exist
in solution in at least three conformational states,
Keywords
cAMP receptorprotein (CRP); CRP–DNA
interactions; fluorescence quenching; FRET,
fast kinetics
Correspondence
Z. Wasylewski, Department of Physical
Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology,
Jagiellonian University, ul. Gronostajowa 7,
30–387 Krako
´
w, Poland
Fax: +48 12 66 46 902
Tel: +48 12 66 46 122
E-mail: wasylewski@mol.uj.edu.pl
(Received 29 July 2004, revised 22
November 2004, accepted 21 December
2004)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04540.x
Cyclic AMP receptorprotein (CRP) regulates the expression of more then
100 genes in Escherichia coli. It is known that the allosteric activation of
CRP bycAMP involves a long-distance signal transmission from the N-ter-
minal cAMP-binding domain to the C-terminal domain of CRP responsible
for the interactions with specific sequences of DNA. In this report we have
used a CRP mutant containing a single Trp13 located in the N-terminal
domain of the protein. We applied the iodide and acrylamide fluorescence
quenching method in order to study how different DNA sequences and
cAMP binding induce the conformationalchanges in the CRP molecule.
The results presented provide evidence for the occurrence of a long-
distance conformational signal transduction within the proteinfrom the
C-terminal DNA-binding domain to the N-terminal domain of CRP. This
conformational signal transmission depends on the promoter sequence. We
also used the stopped-flow and Fo
¨
rster resonance energy transfer between
labeled Cys178 of CRP and fluorescently labeled DNA sequences to study
the kinetics of DNA–CRP interactions. The results thus obtained lead to
the conclusion that CRP can exist in several conformational states and that
their distribution is affected bybindingof both the cAMPandof specific
DNA sequences.
Abbreviations
CRP, cyclic AMP receptor protein; CRP–AEDANS, CRP covalently labeled with 1,5-I-AEDANS attached to Cys178; apo–CRP, unligated CRP;
FRET, Fo
¨
rster resonance energy transfer; FQRS, fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra; galF, a fragment ofDNA sequence recognized by
CRP in the galP1 promoter covalently labeled with fluorescein at the 5¢ end; HTH, helix-turn-helix; lacF, a fragment ofDNA sequence
recognized by CRP in the lacP1 promoter covalently labeled with fluorescein at the 5¢ end; ICAPF, consensus DNA sequence recognized by
CRP covalently labeled with fluorescein at the 5¢-end; wt, wild type.
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS 1103
i.e. free CRP, CRP–(cAMP)
2
and CRP–(cAMP)
4
.In
the presence of % 100 lm cAMP, the protein becomes
activated by the formation of a CRP–(cAMP)
2
com-
plex and it is then able to recognize and bind specific
DNA sequences and stimulate transcription [5].
Unfortunately, the crystal structure of unligated CRP
has not yet been established, which makes a simple
comparison between the two forms of the protein
impossible. However, it has been suggested from the
crystal structure studies that the cAMP-induced allo-
steric transition may involve a change in relative ori-
entation of the subunits and a change in orientation
of the DNA-binding domain relative to the cAMP-
binding domain [6]. Indeed, our Fo
¨
rster resonance
energy transfer (FRET) measurements show that the
binding of anticAMP in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex
results in a movement of the C-terminal domain of
CRP by % 8A
˚
towards the N-terminal domain [7].
As in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex the anticAMP is
buried within the N-terminal domain of the protein
located at least 10 A
˚
away from the hinge region,
the allosteric activation of CRP must involve a long-
distance signal transmission within the protein. Recent
studies [8] suggest that this long-distance communica-
tion between the two CRP domains and subunits
involves the Asp138 residue, located in the CRP hinge
region, which represents part of the signal transduc-
tion network.
Depending on the location of the CRP-binding site
on the DNA promoter and the mechanism of CRP–
RNA polymerase interaction, the simple CRP-depend-
ent promoters are divided into two classes [1]. Class I
promoters, such as lacP1, are characterized by the
location of the CRP-binding site centred at position
)61.5. In the case of class II promoters, such as galP1,
the CRP-binding site is located at position )41.5. The
activation of the transcription process requires the
interaction between the RNA polymerase a subunit
C-terminal domain and the CRP-activating region,
AR1 [9]. The class II promoter requires the interaction
with both the AR1 activation region of CRP and
the activation region of AR2, located in the CRP
N-terminal domain [10].
Each CRP subunit contains two tryptophan residues
at positions 13 and 85 (Fig. 1), both located in the
protein’s N-terminal domain [11]. Trp85 is located
near the anticAMP-binding site and Trp13 is situated
close to the activation region, AR2, of CRP. Using
single tryptophan-containing mutants, we have recently
shown that the bindingofcAMP in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex alters the surroundings of Trp13, whereas
its binding in the CRP–(cAMP)
4
complex leads to
changes in the Trp85 microenvironment [7]. We
present evidence that CRP bindingto the different
DNA sequences leads to long-distance conformational
signal transmission from the C-terminal domain to the
N-terminal domain of the protein. Furthermore, we
present the kinetics of DNA–CRP interactions, as
determined by using FRET measurements, between
labeled Cys178 of CRP and fluorescently labeled DNA
sequences (Fig. 1).
The mechanism of the cAMP-induced long-distance
structural communication within the CRP remains an
important part of our understanding of the mechan-
ism underlying the transcription-regulating activity
of this protein. However, it is an open question as to
how the bindingof the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex to
different specific promoter DNA sequences can trigger
the conformationalchanges in the protein that may
consequently lead tochanges in the interactions
between the activator and other participants of the
transcription machinery. Does it involve a conforma-
tional signal transmission from the C-terminal domain
of CRP through the hinge region to the N-terminal
domain? We believe that elucidation of the signal
transduction pathway from the different DNA
sequences to the activation regions in CRP may pro-
vide a structural paradigm for understanding the tran-
scription activation process. Therefore, we suggest
that the CRP does not act by the simple ‘recruitment’
mechanism in transcription machinery, as has been
suggested recently [12], but behaves as a very dynamic
entity.
Fig. 1. Structure of the cyclic AMP receptorprotein (CRP) dimer
complexed with DNA. The locations of tryptophan residues are
marked in red, the location of the Cys178 residue is indicated in
yellow and fluorescein is shown in green. The figure was generated
by
WEBLAB VIEWERPRO (version 3.7) using atomic coordinates for the
cAMP–CRP–DNA complex [44]. The coordinates were obtained
from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (accession code 1CGP).
CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP M. Tworzydło et al.
1104 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS
Results
Steady-state fluorescence quenching studies
The fluorescence quenchingstudies with iodide and
acrylamide were performed in 20 mm Tris⁄ HCl buffer,
pH 7.9, containing 0.1 m NaCl and 0.1 mm EDTA. In
measurements involving the protein–ligand complex,
the final concentration ofcAMP was 100 lm. In all
cases, the excitation wavelength was 295 nm, so it can
be assumed that the fluorescence emission observed
was only from tryptophan residues.
A typical Stern–Volmer plot of fluorescence quench-
ing of the single tryptophan of the CRPW85A mutant
is shown in Fig. 2. The downward curvature of the
plot indicates the presence of two or more emitting
components which differ in a Stern–Volmer quenching
constant, K
SV
. The fluorescence quenching data were
analyzed according to Eqn (3), by using a nonlinear
least-squares procedure. The analysis was conducted
for all the quenching data, i.e. for about 40 different
emission spectra. Judging by the calculated v
2
value
and the residual distribution, the phenomenon can be
described by a two-component model in which one
component in the protein is more available for the
quencher and characterized by K
SV1
¼ 9.61 m
)1
and
an f
1
of % 0.55, while the other component is less
accessible to the iodide with K
SV2
¼ 1.69 m
)1
and
f
2
¼ 0.45. The best theoretical-fit line calculated for
the given emission wavelength is shown in Fig. 2A.
Similar results were obtained for the CRPW85A–
(cAMP)
2
complex. The Stern–Volmer plot also curved
down (data not shown). The bindingofcAMP resulted
in a small increase of the K
SV1
value from 9.61 m
)1
to
10.08 m
)1
and the more visible increase of the K
SV2
value from 1.69 m
)1
to 2.85 m
)1
.
When acrylamide was used as a quencher, the
Stern–Volmer plots of CRPW85A and its complex
with cAMP showed a small upward curvature indica-
ting that a static quenching mechanism is involved
(Fig. 2B). For both species, the best fits were obtained
for a model in which one component is accessible to
the nonionic quencher. For CRPW85A, the acrylamide
Stern–Volmer constant is equal to 5.76 m
)1
, while for
the cAMP complex, K
SV
¼ 6.62 m
)1
, and the values of
a static quenching constant, V, are 0.84 m
)1
and
0.27 m
)1
, respectively. The fitting parameters for iodide
and acrylamide quenching are given in Table 1.
Figure 3 shows, for the first time, the spectra of
CRP, containing a single Trp13 residue, resolved into
components by using the fluorescence-quenching-
resolved spectra (FQRS) method, using iodide as a
quencher. The component characterized by a higher
Stern–Volmer constant (9.61 m
)1
) was found to exhibit
a maximum at 350 nm andto account for 55% of the
fluorescence emission. The second component, charac-
terized by the average K
SV
¼ 1.69 m
)1
, is responsible
for % 45% of the total emission and has a maximum
at 338 nm.
Fig. 2. (A) Typical Stern–Volmer plot for iodide quenching of
CRPW85A (
). The solid line represents the best fit with the fol-
lowing parameters: K
SV1
¼ 9.11 M
)1
, f
1
¼ 0.48, K
SV2
¼ 2.89 M
)1
,
f
2
¼ 0.40. (B) Typical Stern–Volmer plots for acrylamide quenching
of CRPW85A (
) andof CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
(h). The solid lines
represent the best fits with the following parameters: CRPW85A,
K
SV
¼ 5.64 M
)1
, V ¼ 0.74 M
)1
, f ¼ 1; CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
, K
SV
¼
6.45
M
)1
, V ¼ 0.22 M
)1
, f ¼ 1. The excitation was at 295 nm and
the emission at 340 nm.
M. Tworzydło et al. CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAand cAMP
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS 1105
FQRS spectra of CRPW85A with cAMP are repre-
sented in Fig. 4. The bindingof the ligand results in a
blue shift of the total spectrum maximum from about
342 nm to 340 nm. The more quenchable component
exhibits a k
max
at 344 nm, whereas the maximum of
the less quenchable component remains unchanged at
338 nm. The maxima of the resolved spectra and their
relative intensities, measured as the areas under each
of the resolved spectra, are given in Table 1.
Analogous measurements were performed for CRP–
DNA complexes. Figure 5A,B shows typical Stern–
Volmer plots obtained for iodide and acrylamide
quenching of the CRPW85A mutant bound to ICAP,
lac and gal sequences.
For all three DNA fragments, the Stern–Volmer
plots of fluorescence quenchingby iodide exhibit a
downward curvature, and the best fits were obtained
with a two-component model in which one component
is quenchable and the second remains inaccessible for
the quencher. In order to prove that the downward
curvature was not a result of the ionic strength chan-
ges when iodide was added, the titration of the
CRPW85A–DNA complexes with KCl was performed
and it did not lead to any substantial changes in
the fluorescence emission of the complexes. The high-
est Stern–Volmer constant, amounting to 7.45 m
)1
,
characterizes the CRPW85A–ICAP complex. For
CRPW85A–lac, the value of K
SV1
is 5.54 m
)1
, and for
CRPW85A–gal, the value of K
SV2
is 5.02 m
)1
. The
quenched components account for % 78–81% of the
total fluorescence emission.
When acrylamide was used for quenching, the
Stern–Volmer plots for two complexes of CRPW85A,
with ICAP and lac sequences, were found to be
linear so the model with one totally quenched com-
ponent was used for calculations. The dynamic
quenching constant values for these two species
were 6.35 and 6.15 m
)1
, respectively. Only for the
CRPW85A–gal complex did the upward curvature
appear, indicating the presence of static quenching,
characterized by the constant V ¼ 1.35 m
)1
. The K
SV
for the CRPW85A–gal complex was lower than for
the complexes with the ICAP and lac sequences and
equaled 5.53 m
)1
.
The total fluorescence emission of all three
CRPW85A–DNA complexes had maxima at the same
wavelength as the CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
complex
(Figs 6, 7 and 8), i.e. at 340 nm. The resolved spectra
which correspond to the unquenchable components
have maxima at around 338 nm, while the maxima of
quenchable components are located at around 344 nm.
The detailed parameters of the resolved spectra of the
CRPW85A–DNA complexes, with iodide used as a
quencher, are presented in Table 1.
Time-resolved fluorescence data
Fluorescence lifetime measurements of the CRPW85A
mutant and its complexes with cAMPandDNA were
conducted using an excitation wavelength equal to
295 nm. Phase and modulation were analyzed by using
single- and double-exponential decay models. The bet-
ter fits, i.e. of lower values of the reduced v
2
, were
obtained for a double-exponential model. The values
of mean fluorescence lifetimes, defined as s
m
¼ Sf
i
s,
are presented in Table 2.
Table 1. Fluorescencequenching parameters for CRPW85A, CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
and CRPW85A–DNA complexes. Iodide and acrylamide
quenching studies were performed in Tris buffer, pH 7.9 at 20 °C. In the experiments with CRPW85A complexed tocAMPand DNA, the
concentration ofcAMP was 100 l
M. Quenching data were fitted to either a one- or a two-component model (Eqn 1). The presented parame-
ters were obtained for the model characterized by minimum values of reduced v
2
. K
SV
and V are average values calculated for the wave-
length range between 330 and 370 nm. The error did not exceed 5%. FQRS, fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra.
Species K
SV1
(M
)1
) K
SV2
(M
)1
) V (M
)1
) f
1
FQRS
k
maks1
(nm) k
maks2
(nm)
Iodide quenching
CRPW85A 9.61 1.69 – 0.55 350 338
CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
10.08 2.85 – 0.57 344 338
CRPW85A–ICAP 7.45 0.00 – 0.80 345 338
CRPW85A–lac 5.54 0.00 – 0.78 346 340
CRPW85A–gal 5.02 0.00 – 0.81 343 337
Acrylamide quenching
CRPW85A 5.76 – 0.84 1.00 – –
CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
6.62 – 0.27 1.00 – –
CRPW85A–ICAP 6.35 – – 1.00 – –
CRPW85A–lac 6.15 – – 1.00 – –
CRPW85A–gal 5.53 – 1.33 1.00 – –
CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP M. Tworzydło et al.
1106 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS
Kinetics ofDNAbindingto CRP
A FRET has been used to study the kinetics of CRP–
DNA interactions. The fluorescence characteristics of
CRP-conjugated IAEDANS, with an excitation at
340 nm and a maximum emission at 480 nm, suggest
that it can be used as a donor fluorophore. Oligonucleo-
tides covalently labeled with fluorescein were used as
acceptors.
The application of the FRET method allowed us to
obtain more information about the binding process
between proteinand DNA. One of the advantages is
the possibility of determining the kinetics of the associ-
ation by monitoring the time course of the FRET
effect. Using fluorescein-labeled DNA as the acceptor,
we observed a small increase in acceptor fluorescence
but a significant decrease in IAEDANS emission.
Quenching of the IAEDANS fluorescence intensities is
not solely governed by Fo
¨
rster nonradiative energy
transfer in the CRP–DNA complex, but also by the
DNA itself. The addition of unlabeled DNAto CRP–
AEDANS significantly decreased the fluorescence
intensities of the dye (data not shown) and therefore we
decided to use the acceptor fluorescence to monitor the
CRP–DNA interaction in the FRET kinetic measure-
ments. Mixing an IAEDANS-labeled CRP with a fluo-
rescein-labeled oligonucleotide resulted in an increase
of % 7% in the acceptor fluorescence at the donor exci-
tation wavelength, reaching a plateau at % 0.3 s.
For all DNA sequences and CRP concentrations,
the kinetic traces could be fitted well by a single-expo-
nential curve. The plots of the inverse time constant
(k
obs
) are linear (Fig. 9) and the values of k
off
and the
association-rate parameter, k
on
, listed in Table 3, were
determined as the intercept and the slope that are valid
for a single-step bimolecular association:
Fig. 4. Fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra (FQRS) of
CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
with excitation at 295 nm. Iodide was used as
a quencher. The upper panel represents a plot of Stern–Volmer
constants as a function of the emission wavelength. The lower
panel shows the FQRS: (
) the total emission spectrum with a
maximum at about 340 nm; (h ) the more quenchable component
with a maximum at % 344 nm, characterized by an average value of
K
SV1
¼ 10.08 M
)1
and a fraction f
1
¼ 0.57; ( ) the less quenchable
component with the maximum at % 338 nm, characterized by an
average value of K
SV2
¼ 2.85 M
)1
and a fraction f
2
¼ 0.43.
Fig. 3. Fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra (FQRS) of
CRPW85A with excitation at 295 nm. Iodide was used as a quen-
cher. The upper panel represents a plot of Stern–Volmer constants
as a function of the emission wavelength. The lower panel shows
the FQRS spectra: (
) the total emission spectrum with a maxi-
mum at about 342 nm; (
) the more quenchable component with a
maximum at about 350 nm, characterized by an average value of
K
SV1
¼ 9.61 M
)1
and a fraction f
1
¼ 0.55; and ( ) the less quencha-
ble component with a maximum at about 338 nm, characterized by
an average value of K
SV2
¼ 1.69 M
)1
and a fraction f
2
¼ 0.45.
M. Tworzydło et al. CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAand cAMP
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS 1107
CRPÀðcAMPÞ
2
þ DNA À!
k
on
k
off
DNAÀCRPÀðcAMPÞ
2
and which
k
obs
¼ k
off
þ k
on
½CRPÀAEDANSð1Þ
with the total concentration used of IAEDANS
attached to CRP denoted as [CRP–AEDANS]. An
equilibrium binding constant can be calculated from
the ratio of the rate constants k
on
and k
off
as follows:
K
a
¼
k
on
k
off
ð2Þ
Association constants (K
a
) of CRP with the three
investigated sequences ofDNA – lacF, galF and
ICAPF – are summarized in Table 3.
Discussion
The molecular mechanism of signal transduction
within CRP upon bindingof the allosteric inductor to
CRP high-affinity binding sites involves a sequence
of proteinconformational changes, which shift the
protein from a low-affinity nonspecific DNA-binding
protein to a state of the protein that binds DNA with
Fig. 5. (A) Typical Stern–Volmer plots for iodide quenching of
CRPW85A complexes with DNA. The solid lines represent the best
fits with the following parameters: (r) CRPW85A–ICAP, K
SV1
¼
6.57
M
)1
, f
1
¼ 0.80; (d) CRPW85A–lac, K
SV1
¼ 5.46 M
)1
, f
1
¼ 0.78;
and (,) CRPW85A–gal, K
SV1
¼ 4.63 M
)1
, f
1
¼ 0.81. (B) Typical
Stern–Volmer plots for acrylamide quenchingof CRPW85A com-
plexes with DNA. The solid lines represent the best fits with the
following parameters: (e) CRPW85A–ICAP, K
SV
¼ 5.92 M
)1
, f ¼ 1;
(d) CRPW85A–lac, K
SV
¼ 5.74 M
)1
, f ¼ 1; (.) CRPW85A–gal,
K
SV
¼ 5.30 M
)1
, V ¼ 1.16 M
)1
, f ¼ 1. The excitation was at 295 nm
and the emission at 340 nm.
Fig. 6. Fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra (FQRS) of
CRPW85A–ICAP with excitation at 295 nm. Iodide was used as a
quencher. The upper panel represents a plot of Stern–Volmer con-
stant as a function of the emission wavelength. The lower panel
shows the FQRS: (e) the total emission spectrum with maximum
at % 340 nm; (r) the quenchable component with a maximum at
% 345 nm, characterized by an average value of K
SV1
¼ 7.45 M
)1
and a fraction f
1
¼ 0.80; and ( ) the unquenchable component with
a maximum at %338 nm, characterized by an average value of
K
SV2
¼ 0.00 M
)1
and a fraction f
2
¼ 0.20.
CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP M. Tworzydło et al.
1108 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS
high affinity and sequence specificity [2]. A variety of
biochemical and biophysical studies [13–16], including
our fast-kinetics studies [17,18], as well as steady-state
and time-resolved fluorescence [7,19] investigations,
have shown that the allosteric mechanism involves sub-
unit realignment and hinge reorientation between the
domains. Our previous FRET measurements have
shown that cAMPbindingto the anti sites of CRP
shifts the average distance from the C-terminal domain
towards the N-terminal domain from 26.6 A
˚
in apo–
CRP to 18.7 A
˚
in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex [7]. The
details of the structural mechanism of CRP activation
by a cAMP have not been established because of the
lack of an X-ray structure for apo–CRP. However, it
may be expected that the bindingof an allosteric
inductor, cAMP, as well as an interaction of the
protein with the specific DNA promoter sequences in
solution can lead tochanges in the protein activation
regions, which in turn allows CRP to interact with the
a subunit of RNA polymerase. Recently [7] we have
suggested that cAMPbindingto anti sites leads to an
increase in the structural dynamic motion around the
Trp13 residue, which is close to the activation region
AR2, responsible for the interaction of CRP with
RNA polymerase [10].
The tryptophan residue is widely used as an intrinsic
fluorescence probe to observe changes in protein struc-
ture [20]. High indole sensitivity to its microenviron-
ment in a protein moiety can be used to follow protein
structural changes, especially if the complicated emis-
sion of tryptophan residues may be resolved into com-
ponents. The difficulties in the interpretation of its
fluorescence emission result from the dynamics of pro-
tein structure and the multiple ground-state conformers,
each of which is characterized by distinct tryptophan
Fig. 7. Fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra (FQRS) of
CRPW85A–lac with excitation at 295 nm. Iodide was used as a
quencher. The upper panel represents a plot of Stern–Volmer con-
stant as a function of the emission wavelength. The lower panel
shows the FQRS spectra: (s) the total emission spectrum with a
maximum at % 340 nm; (d) the quenchable component with a
maximum at % 346 nm, characterized by an average value of
K
SV1
¼ 5.54 M
)1
and a fraction f
1
¼ 0.78; and ( ) the unquen-
chable component with a maximum at % 340 nm, characterized by
an average value of K
SV2
¼ 0.00 M
)1
and a fraction f
2
¼ 0.22.
Fig. 8. Fluorescence-quenching-resolved spectra (FQRS) of
CRPW85A–gal with excitation at 295 nm. Iodide was used as a
quencher. The upper panel represents a plot of Stern–Volmer con-
stant as a function of the emission wavelength. The lower panel
shows the FQRS: (,) the total emission spectrum with a maximum
at about 340 nm; (.) the quenchable component with a maximum
at about 343 nm, characterized by an average value of K
SV1
¼
5.02
M
)1
and a fraction f
1
¼ 0.81; and ( ) the unquenchable com-
ponent with a maximum at about 337 nm, characterized by an aver-
age value of K
SV2
¼ 0.00 M
)1
and a fraction f
2
¼ 0.19.
M. Tworzydło et al. CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAand cAMP
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS 1109
residue microenvironments [20]. To resolve the fluores-
cence emission spectra into components in a protein
containing multiple tryptophan residues, advanced
techniques for analyzing fluorescence decay emission
may be used [20]. Under steady-state conditions, the
quenching processes may be analyzed by the external
quenchers by using the FQRS method [21,22]. Quench-
ing experiments are especially useful in studying the
changes in the conformation of proteins that may be
induced by ligand binding. If the studied protein pos-
sesses several tryptophan residues, then the interpret-
ation of a change in the quenchability is more difficult.
However, site-directed mutagenesis may be used to
obtain a single tryptophan-containing mutant protein,
which will allow for a more straightforward interpret-
ation of fluorescence quenching data.
In this study, we used site-directed mutagenesis to
obtain the CRPW85A mutant and used the FQRS
method to observe conformationalchanges in the pro-
tein upon bindingofcAMPand fragments of DNA
possessing specific sequences. Each CRP wild-type
(CRPwt) subunit contains two tryptophan residues at
positions 13 and 85, both located in the N-terminal
domain of the protein [11,23]. Our previous fluores-
cence quenching investigations [24] of CRPwt have
shown that in apo–CRP, % 80% of the tryptophan
fluorescence emission can be attributed to Trp13 and
20% of the fluorescence emission originates from
Trp85. Our recently presented data concerning CRP
mutants containing a single Trp13 or Trp85 residue
indicate that bindingofcAMPto anti sites in the
CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex leads tochanges in the Trp13
microenvironment, whereas its bindingto syn sites in
the CRP–(cAMP)
4
complex alters the surroundings of
Trp85 [7].
The results presented in this report provide further
evidence that bindingofcAMPto the anti site of CRP
induces local structural changes in the vicinity of
Table 2. Fluorescence lifetimes and bimolecular quenching constants values for CRPW85A, CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
and CRPW85A–DNA com-
plexes. Experiments were performed at 20 °C in Tris buffer, pH 7.9. In the experiments with CRPW85A complexed tocAMPand DNA, the
concentration ofcAMP was 100 l
M. Excitation was at 295 nm and emission through a cut-off filter. The error did not exceed 5%.
Species
s
1
(ns) f
1
s
2
(ns)
s
m
(ns)
Iodide
quenching Acrylamide quenching
k
q1
(M
)1
Æs
)1
)
x10
)1
k
q2
(M
)1
Æs
)1
)
x10
)1
k
q1
(M
)1
Æs
)1
)
x10
)1
CRPW85A 3.09 0.69 0.58 2.31 4.16 0.73 2.49
CRPW85A–(cAMP)
2
2.99 0.65 0.55 2.14 4.67 1.23 3.09
CRPW85A–ICAP 2.54 0.59 0.29 1.62 4.60 – 3.92
CRPW85A–lac 4.23 0.57 0.62 2.68 2.07 – 2.29
CRPW85A–gal 3.93 0.51 0.62 2.31 2.17 – 3.39
Fig. 9. Kinetics ofbinding between IAEDANS-labeled CRP and fluo-
rescein-labeled DNA, as measured by stopped-flow fluorymetry of
the Fo
¨
rster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Measurements were
performed at 20 °C, in buffer B, pH 8.0, with a DNA concentration
of 0.2 l
M:(d) lacF;(,) galF;(r) ICAPF. Excitation was at 340 nm
and emission > 500 nm.
Table 3. Kineticand thermodynamic parameters describing the
binding of lacF, galF and ICAPF to the wild-type cyclic AMP recep-
tor protein (CRPwt). The values are derived from experiments con-
ducted at 20 °C, in 50 m
M Tris ⁄ HCl buffer, containing 100 mM KCl,
1m
M EDTA, pH 8.0, in the presence of 200 lM cAMP. Kinetic and
thermodynamic parameters are defined as detailed in the Experi-
mental procedures. The error is the SD of fitted parameters.
Complex k
off
(s
)1
) k
on
(s
)1
ÆM
)1
) · 10
6
K
a
(M
)1
) · 10
5
CRPwt–ICAPF 5.8 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.2 5.9 ± 0.9
CRPwt–lacF 8.5 ± 0.9 1.1 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.3
CRPwt–galF 5.1 ± 0.9 2.4 ± 0.2 4.7 ± 0.9
CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP M. Tworzydło et al.
1110 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS
Trp13. Our fluorescence quenching measurements of
apo–CRPW85A with iodide demonstrate that the
steady-state fluorescence spectra of Trp13 can be
resolved into two components by using the FQRS
method. This result clearly shows that CRP exists in
two distinct conformational states, each of which is
characterized by a different microenvironment of
Trp13. One of these states is characterized by its own
fluorescence emission spectra with a maximum at
350 nm and the second state is characterized by a
maximum emission spectrum at 338 nm. These two
forms of the protein account for 55% and 45% of the
total fluorescence emission, respectively. In contrast to
the Trp13 residue, the tryptophan located at position
85 is characterized by one distinct fluorescence spec-
trum (data not shown). The conformational state of
apo–CRP, which possesses a maximum of the fluores-
cence emission spectrum at 350 nm, can be character-
ized by a Trp13 Stern–Volmer quenching constant,
K
SV
¼ 9.6 m
)1
. If the average lifetime of Trp13 is
assumed to be 2.3 ns, then the bimolecular rate-
quenching constant, k
q
, can be calculated as
4.16 · 10
9
m
)1
Æs
)1
. This value is typical of the trypto-
phan residues in proteins exposed to a solvent [25].
The second conformational state of CRP can be char-
acterized by a relatively bluer emission with the maxi-
mum at 338 nm. In this conformational state of CRP,
the Trp13 residue is much less accessible to the iodide
quencher, as can be judged by a bimolecular rate
quenching constant, k
q
¼ 0.73 · 10
9
m
)1
Æs
)1
. These
two conformational states of CRP are not distinguish-
able by acrylamide (another quencher used in this
study). The acrylamide bimolecular rate quenching
constant, k
q
, equaling 2.49 · 10
9
m
)1
Æs
)1
, is almost half
that of the iodide rate-quenching constant. It has been
well documented that nonionic acrylamide can penet-
rate into the matrix of globular proteinby diffusion,
which is facilitated by small-amplitude fluctuations in
the protein structure [25,26]. The process of quenching
the fluorescence of Trp residues in proteinby acryl-
amide is more effective than by using the iodide ion
[25,26].
Resolving the component spectra of the Trp13 resi-
due of CRPW85A by using the FQRS method and
fluorescence lifetime measurements enabled us to com-
pare the fractional contributions of the fluorescence of
the red and blue components from the solute quench-
ing experiments by using the fractional contributions
of the short and long lifetimes of the Trp13 residue
obtained by lifetime measurements. A comparison of
the fractional contribution values presented in Tables 1
and 2 shows a significant discrepancy, which suggests
that the two Trp13 residues present in the CRPW85A
homodimer do not fluoresce independently and that
there is an energy transfer between them. A similar
observation has been drawn from the resolved fluores-
cence lifetime and solute quenching measurements per-
formed for several two-tryptophan-containing proteins
[27]. It may also be supposed that the fluorescence
decay of the Trp13 residue is more complex than that
described by a double-exponential decay, but we have
had little success in trying to resolve the fluorescence
to more components on our apparatus. As a result,
when we calculated the bimolecular rate quenching
constants, k
q
, we obtained values of the average Trp13
lifetime instead of the values of lifetimes of the
resolved components.
Binding ofcAMPto anticAMP-binding sites leads
to significant changes in the fluorescing properties of
Trp13 of CRP–(cAMP)
2
, including changes in the
maximum fluorescence emission of the component
more quenchanable by iodide, as well as the increase
in bimolecular rate-quenching constants, k
q
, for iodide
and acrylamide (Tables 1 and 2). These results provide
further evidence for changes in the protein dynamics
induced bycAMPbindingto the anti sites of CRP in
the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex, in the surroundings of
Trp13. As the distance between the Trp13 residue and
the anticAMP molecule, both located in the N-terminal
domain in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex, is % 25.5 A
˚
[6],
the observed changes in Trp13 fluorescence quenching
by iodide and acrylamide result from the transduction
of the conformationalchanges in the protein moiety
and increase the dynamic motion around the Trp13
residue. This observation is in congruence with our
previous time-resolved anisotropy fluorescence meas-
urements of CRP, which show that cAMPbinding to
the protein leads to an increase in the structural
dynamic motion around Trp13 [7]. As the Trp13 resi-
due is close to the activation region of CRP, AR2,
which is responsible for the interaction of the protein
with the a subunit of RNA polymerase, it may be
argued that the changes in the CRP dynamics in this
molecule region can play an important role in signal
transmission in the protein. Similarly, it has been
shown that the Trp13 residue in CRP is directly
engaged in the formation of the CRP complex with
another gene-regulatory protein, such as CytR, in the
CRP–CytR–DNA complex [28].
It is well established that the CRP allosteric activa-
tion involves conformationalchanges that are trans-
mitted from the N-terminal domain to the C-terminal
domain of the protein and, in consequence, enable
CRP to recognize the specific DNA sequences [2,4,11].
The results presented in this work provide evi-
dence for conformational signal transduction in the
M. Tworzydło et al. CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAand cAMP
FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS 1111
CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex after binding specific DNA,
which occurs from the C-terminal domain to the
N-terminal domain of the protein. We have shown this
by using the Trp13-containing mutant of CRP as well
as the iodide and acrylamide fluorescence quenching
method in order to follow the influence ofDNA bind-
ing on the conformationalchanges in its microenviron-
ment. We have used various DNA sequences: lac, gal
and ICAP. The synthetic artificial ICAP DNA posses-
ses a symmetrical sequence, which binds with high
affinity to the CRP HTH motifs, and the lac and gal
DNA sequences represent the CRP-binding sites from
class I and class II CRP-dependent promoters, respect-
ively [1]. Our iodide fluorescence-quenching measure-
ments of DNA–CRP complexes show that CRP still
exists in two different conformational states, but they
significantly differ in Trp13 microenvironments which
determine the Trp13 fluorescing properties. These dif-
ferences do not result from an increase in the ionic
strength of the solution upon titration of the sample
by KI, because the titration performed with KCl up to
a concentration similar to that of KI did not cause
any change in fluorescence of the complexes (data not
shown). The best fits for all the tested DNA sequences,
as judged by reduced v
2
values as well as residual dis-
tribution, have been obtained for two CRP states: one
with an iodide-quenchable and the second with an
iodide-unquenchable Trp13 residue. Binding DNA
sequences to CRP causes only a small change in the
maximum of the two resolved fluorescence emission
spectra, but shows that the iodide-quenchable compo-
nents account for % 75% of the total emission of
Trp13, in comparison to % 55% in the CRP–(cAMP)
2
complex (Table 1). As the bindingof the tested DNA
sequences also leads tochanges in the average fluores-
cence lifetime of Trp13, it may be expected that the
observed changes result from both the static and
dynamic processes that occur in the microenviron-
ments of this residue. Thr10, Asp109 and His17, which
are located within a distance up to 5 A
˚
[29] are the
most probable candidates as quenching residues of
CRP, in the vicinity of Trp13. The accessibility for
iodide as well as acrylamide, expressed by k
q
values
(Table 2), differs for the three studied DNA sequences
and clearly shows that bindingof the particular DNA
to CRP causes different local changes in Trp13 residue
exposition. As this residue is located close to the acti-
vation region, AR2, which is responsible for the inter-
action with the RNA polymerase, it is tempting to
suggest that the bindingof CRP to the DNA promoter
in solution involves a further conformational signal
transduction from the C-terminal domain to the N-ter-
minal domain of CRP, and the magnitude of this
conformational transduction solely depends on the
promoter DNA sequence responsible for this inter-
action. This suggestion is in agreement with small
angle neutron scattering measurements of the CRP–
DNA complex, which indicate that this structural
change in the N-terminal domain of the protein occurs
upon bindingofDNAto the C-terminal domain of
CRP [30]. Our fluorescence studiesof CRP–DNA
interactions presented here also agree with the results
of Baichoo & Heyduk [31], which were obtained by
protein footprinting techniques. These authors, using
chemical proteases of different charge, size and hydro-
phobicity, suggested that the bindingofDNA in solu-
tion induces conformationalchanges in the N-terminal
domain of CRP, close to the activating region, AR2.
Our fast-kinetics study presented here has also
shown that the DNA–CRP interactions depend on the
sequence of the 26 bp DNA fragments. The bimole-
cular rate constant values of 3.4 · 10
6
m
)1
Æs
)1
,
1.1 · 10
6
m
)1
Æs
)1
and 2.4 · 10
6
m
)1
Æs
)1
, determined for
ICAP, lac and gal, respectively, are very similar to the
values of rate constants calculated for the interaction
of DNA with other proteins [32–34]. However, the
monomolecular dissociation rate constants determined
for the CRP–ICAP, CRP–lac and CRP–gal complexes,
of 5.8 s
)1
, 8.5 s
)1
and 5.1 s
)1
, respectively, are signifi-
cantly higher than the range between 10
)3
and 10
)2
s
)1
that has been found for other proteins which interact
with DNA [32–34]. The observed differences in the dis-
sociation rate constants may result from the fast
association of CRP with DNA, which leads to forma-
tion of the low-affinity CRP–DNA complex. This is
followed by the slow process ofconformational chan-
ges in the C-terminal domains of CRP, which permit
formation of the high-affinity complex. As the kinetics
of CRP–DNA interactions have been detected by
determining the resonance energy transfer between
fluorescently labeled CRP and DNA, we have been
able to observe only the first step of the association
process without detecting any possible consecutive
reactions. However, we have observed the fluorescence
intensity changesof CRP–AEDANS upon the binding
of DNA sequences, which result from the conforma-
tional changes in the C-terminal domain of the pro-
tein. The values of CRP–DNA association equilibrium
constants, K
a
, calculated from the rate constants pre-
sented in Table 3, are equal to 5.9 · 10
5
m
)1
,
1.2 · 10
5
m
)1
and 4.7 · 10
5
m
)1
for ICAP, lac and gal,
respectively. These values are slightly lower than the
association constants of 4.0 · 10
5
m
)1
and 11.1 ·
10
5
m
)1
that were determined by isothermal titration
calorimetry for lac and gal, respectively [35]. The
26 bp long DNA sequences – lac, gal and ICAP – have
CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP M. Tworzydło et al.
1112 FEBS Journal 272 (2005) 1103–1116 ª 2005 FEBS
[...]... magnetic resonance study of the cyclic AMP receptorprotein (CRP): assignments of the NH protons of histidine and tryptophan residues and the effect ofbindingofcAMPto CRP Biochem J 107, 304–309 14 Sixl F, King RW, Bracken M & Feeney J (1990) 19 F-n.m.r studiesof ligand bindingto 5-fluorotryptophan- and 3-fluorotyrosine-containing cyclic AMP receptorproteinfromEscherichiacoli Biochem J 266, 545–552... cAMP -induced allosteric changes in cyclic AMP receptorproteinfromEscherichiacoli J Biol Chem 275, 8480–8486 18 Polit A, Bonarek P, Kepys B, Kedracka-Krok S, ´ Gorecki A & Wasylewski Z (2003) Kineticstudiesof 1115 CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 cAMP -induced allosteric changes in T127I, S128A and T127I ⁄ S128A mutants ofcAMPreceptor protein. .. Wasylewski Z (2003) Steadystate and time-resolved fluorescence studiesofconformationalchangesinducedby cyclic AMP andDNAbindingto cyclic AMP receptorproteinfromEscherichiacoli Eur J Biochem 270, 1413–1423 8 Yu S & Lee JC (2004) Role of residue 138 in the interdomain hinge region in transmitting allosteric signals for DNAbinding in EscherichiacolicAMPreceptorprotein Biochemistry 43, 4662–4669... proteinfromEscherichiacoli J Biol Chem 278, 43020–43026 Błaszczyk U, Polit A, Guz A & Wasylewski Z (2002) Interaction ofcAMPreceptorproteinfromEscherichiacoli with cAMPandDNA studied by dynamic light scattering and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy methods J Protein Chem 20, 601–610 Lakowicz JR (1999) Principles ofFluorescence Spectroscopy Kluver Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands... Comparison ofcAMPreceptorproteinand a cAMP- independent form of CRP by Raman spectroscopy andDNAbinding Biochemistry 30, 5076–5080 16 Leu SF, Baker CH, Lee EJ & Harman JG (1999) Position 127 amino acid substitutions affect the formation of CRP :cAMP: lacP complexes but not CRP :cAMP: RNA polymerase complexes at lacP Biochemistry 38, 6222–6230 17 Małecki J, Polit A & Wasylewski Z (2000) KineticstudiesofcAMP -induced. .. resolution of heterogeneus of multitryptophan-containing proteins studied by a fluorescence -quenching method Eur J Biochem 158, 547–553 Wasylewski Z, Koloczek H & Wasniowska A (1988) Fluorescence- quenching resolved spectroscopy of proteins Eur J Biochem 172, 719–724 Heyduk T & Lee JS (1989) EscherichiacolicAMPreceptor protein: evidence for three proteinconformational states with different promoter binding. .. Tworzydło et al CRP conformationalchangesinducedbyDNAandcAMPfrom a thermostatically controlled bath All measurements were performed in buffer B The FRET kinetic experiments were used for quantitative measurements of CRP DNAbinding in the presence of 200 lm cAMP We observed energy transfer between the 1,5-I-AEDANS moiety covalently attached to Cys178 CRPwt and fluorescein attached to the DNA (Fig 1)... experiments were initiated by mixing equal volumes of oligonucleotides (fixed concentrations of 0.2 or 0.4 lm) and various concentrations of the labeled protein, from 1 to 7 lm Five to 10 kinetic traces were collected and averaged for each concentration point The data were fitted to extract rate constants and amplitudes by using nonlinear least-squares fitting software provided by Applied Photophysics (Leatherhead,... 5¢-monophosphate and guanosine cyclic 3¢,5¢monophosphate to the adenosine cyclic 3¢,5¢-monophosphate receptorproteinfromEscherichiacoli Biochemistry 19, 5124–5130 42 Gill SC & von Hippel PH (1989) Calculation ofprotein coefficients from amino acids sequence data Anal Biochem 182, 319–326 43 Eilen E & Krakow JS (1977) Cyclic AMP-mediated intersubunit disulfide crosslinking of the cyclic AMP receptorproteinof Escherichia. .. Record MT Jr (2002) Kineticstudiesand structural models of the association of E coli r70 RNA polymerase with the lPR promoter: large scale conformationalchanges in forming the kinetically significant intermediates J Mol Biol 319, 649–671 35 Shi Y, Wang S, Krueger S & Schwarz FP (1999) Effect of mutations at the monomer–monomer interface ofcAMPreceptorprotein on specific DNAbinding J Biol Chem 274, . Fluorescence quenching and kinetic studies of
conformational changes induced by DNA and cAMP
binding to cAMP receptor protein from Escherichia coli
Magdalena. Steady-
state and time-resolved fluorescence studies of confor-
mational changes induced by cyclic AMP and DNA
binding to cyclic AMP receptor protein from Escheri-
chia