Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 14 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
14
Dung lượng
1,08 MB
Nội dung
Comprehensiveinteractionofdicalcinwith annexins
in frogolfactoryandrespiratory cilia
Tatsuya Uebi
1
, Naofumi Miwa
1,2,
* and Satoru Kawamura
1,2
1 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Japan
2 Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Japan
Calcium ions are known to modulate signal transduc-
tion in various cells. This effect is usually mediated
by Ca
2+
-binding proteins. For example, in olfactory
receptor cells, odorant stimuli induce Ca
2+
influx
through a cyclic nucleotide gated channel [1]. The
increase in the Ca
2+
concentration is detected by
calmodulin, a well-known Ca
2+
-binding protein. The
Ca
2+
-bound form of calmodulin has essential roles in
olfactory adaptation [2,3]. In photoreceptor cells, sev-
eral Ca
2+
-binding proteins are known to be present
and to modulate phototransduction signals [4].
We previously found a Ca
2+
-binding protein, dical-
cin (renamed from p26olf [5]), infrogolfactory epithe-
lium, and reported that dicalcin is expressed in the
olfactory epithelium, lung, and spleen [6,7]. In the
olfactory epithelium and lung, dicalcin localizes in the
cilia. Dicalcin has partial homology to S100 proteins, a
family of EF-hand Ca
2+
-binding proteins, and consists
of two S100A11-like regions aligned in sequence. The
amino acid sequences in the N-terminal and the C-ter-
minal halves show 58% and 45% identity, respectively,
to chick S100A11 [7]. The predicted structure of dical-
cin is similar to that of an S100 dimer [8].
S100 proteins are known to be involved in various
cellular functions, such as cell cycle progression and
cell survival [9–11]. S100 proteins show no enzymatic
activities by themselves and, instead, modulate the
function of other proteins through direct binding to
Keywords
annexin; dicalcin; olfactory cilia; respiratory
cilia; S100
Correspondence
S. Kawamura, Graduate School of Frontier
Biosciences, Osaka University, Yamada-oka
1–3, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Fax: +81 6 6879 4614
Tel: +81 6 6879 4610
E-mail: kawamura@fbs.osaka-u.ac.jp
*Present address
Department of Physiology, School of
Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
Database
Amino acid sequences have been submitted
to DDBJ under the following accession
numbers: frog annexin A1, AB286845; frog
annexin A2, AB286846; frog annexin A4,
AB286848; frog annexin A5, AB286847
(Received 8 May 2007, revised 20 July
2007, accepted 24 July 2007)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06007.x
Dicalcin (renamed from p26olf) is a dimer form of S100 proteins found
in frogolfactory epithelium. S100 proteins form a group of EF-hand
Ca
2+
-binding proteins, and are known to interact with many kinds of tar-
get protein to modify their activities. To determine the role ofdicalcin in
the olfactory epithelium, we identified its binding proteins. Several proteins
in frogolfactory epithelium were found to bind to dicalcinin a
Ca
2+
-dependent manner. Among them, 38 kDa and 35 kDa proteins were
most abundant. Our analysis showed that these were a mixture of annex-
in A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5. Immunohistochemical analysis showed
that dicalcinand all of these three subtypes of annexin colocalize in the
olfactory cilia. Dicalcin was found to be present in a quantity almost suffi-
cient to bind all of these annexins. Colocalization ofdicalcinand the three
subtypes of annexin was also observed in the frogrespiratory cilia. Dicalcin
facilitated Ca
2+
-dependent liposome aggregation caused by annexin A1 or
annexin A2, and this facilitation was additive when both annexin A1 and
annexin A2 were present. In this facilitation effect, the effective Ca
2+
con-
centrations were different between annexin A1 and annexin A2, and there-
fore the dicalcin–annexin system infrogolfactoryandrespiratorycilia can
cover a wide range of Ca
2+
concentrations. These results suggested that
this system is associated with abnormal increases in the Ca
2+
concentration
in the olfactoryand other motile cilia.
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4863
these proteins. p53, RAGE andannexins are known to
be binding proteins of S100 proteins. S100 proteins are
known to form dimers, and the dimer form binds to
the binding protein to exert the effect. Because dicalcin
consists of two S100-like domains aligned in sequence,
the function ofdicalcin is probably similar to that of
an S100 dimer.
Although the Ca
2+
-binding property has been inves-
tigated in detail indicalcin [12], little is known about
its physiologic function. To investigate this, in the
present study we first tried to determine the binding
proteins of dicalcin. We found that several of the pro-
teins infrogolfactory epithelium bind to dicalcinin a
Ca
2+
-dependent manner. Among them, 38 kDa and
35 kDa proteins were the major proteins. We identified
them as annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5. We
further examined their localizations and the effect of
dicalcin on the activities of these annexins by measur-
ing liposome aggregation.
Results
Purification of binding proteins of dicalcin
Binding proteins ofdicalcin were searched for among
the soluble and membrane-associated proteins of frog
olfactory cilia. Because dicalcin is an S100-like
EF-hand Ca
2+
-binding protein, we expected that the
binding proteins would bind to dicalcinin a Ca
2+
-
dependent manner. The Chaps-solubilized fraction
(see Experimental procedures) containing the mem-
brane-associated proteins infrogolfactory cilia
(Fig. 1, cilia) was loaded onto a dicalcin-Sepharose
column at 1 mm Ca
2+
. Most of the proteins were
found in the pass-through fraction (Fig. 1, elution
peak A and lane A), but some of the proteins were
retained, and eluted by reducing the Ca
2+
concentra-
tion (Fig. 1, elution peak B and lane B). Several pro-
teins were found in lane B, but the major proteins
were 38 kDa and 35 kDa proteins. The latter could
be one of the binding proteins detected in our previ-
ous dicalcin-overlay analysis [13]. In control studies,
we did not see the binding of these proteins when
dicalcin was not attached to the Sepharose beads
(Fig. 1C). Although the amount of each of the eluted
proteins varied among preparations, 38 kDa and
35 kDa proteins were always the major constituents.
We therefore focused on these proteins in the follow-
ing study. Essentially similar binding proteins were
detected when we used the soluble protein fraction,
but the amounts of the proteins were greater in the
Chaps-solubilized fraction. For this reason, we used
this fraction in the following studies.
Amino acid sequence analysis of 38 kDa and
35 kDa proteins
During the course of this study, we realized that
35 kDa proteins contained proteolytic fragments of
38 kDa proteins: in the presence of protease inhibi-
tors, the amount of 38 kDa proteins was larger than
that in the absence of the inhibitors. However, we
could not inhibit the proteolysis completely: even in
the presence of a cocktail of inhibitors, our immuno-
logic study detected signals of 38 kDa proteins at the
35 kDa position (see Fig. 3A below). In addition, the
degree of inhibition was variable, depending on each
preparation. Nevertheless, the binding proteins of di-
calcin, mainly the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins,
were fragmented by a protease. The resultant proteo-
lytic fragments were isolated by RP-HPLC, and their
amino acid sequences were determined. The result
suggested that the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins
are the annexin family proteins. The result, however,
was complex: the amino acid sequences of the frag-
ments did not match the sequence of a single annexin
family protein. Instead, the sequence of a fragment
showed some similarity to the sequence of annex-
in A1, annexin A2, annexin A4 or annexin A5 of
Fig. 1. Purification of binding proteins ofdicalcin by affinity column
chromatography. The Chaps-solubilized protein fraction of the cilia
of frogolfactory epithelium was loaded to a dicalcin-Sepharose col-
umn at 1 m
M Ca
2+
. Most of the proteins passed through the col-
umn (A in the elution profile) at a high (1 m
M)Ca
2+
concentration,
but some proteins remained in the column and came out only after
addition of 5 m
M EGTA (B in the profile). Inset: SDS ⁄ PAGE patterns
of the Chaps-solubilized cilia protein fraction (cilia), the pass-through
fraction (A) and the eluate in the presence of 5 m
M EGTA (B). As a
control, an eluate was obtained similarly as in (B), but with the use
of Sepharose beads without dicalcin conjugated (C). Proteins were
stained with silver.
Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia T. Uebi et al.
4864 FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
other animal species, which suggested that the
38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins were a mixture of
these annexins. We therefore tried to isolate cDNAs
of annexin A1, annexin A2, annexin A4 and annex-
in A5 to identify which annexins were in the fraction
of the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins.
Cloning of annexin cDNAs
On the basis of the partial amino acid sequences of the
proteolytic fragments as determined above, we synthe-
sized oligonucleotide degenerate primers and used
them to search for the cDNA fragments of the corres-
ponding annexins. Partial cDNA fragments of annex-
in A1, annexin A2, annexin A4 and annexin A5 were
amplified, and the frogolfactory cDNA library
was screened with these fragments. The full-length
sequences offrog annexin cDNAs were obtained, and
the amino acid sequences were deduced (supplemen-
tary Fig. S1). The amino acid sequences detected in
the proteolytic fragments were found in the deduced
amino acid sequences offrog annexin A1, annexin A2,
and annexin A5, but not in the sequence offrog an-
nexin A4. This result indicated that annexin A4 was
not present, or the content of annexin A4 was small in
the fraction of the 38 kDa and 35 kDa proteins.
Among our recombinant annexins (see below), the
apparent molecular mass of annexin A4 was slightly
lower than 35 kDa on our SDS ⁄ PAGE gel. Because
the density of the corresponding position on the
SDS ⁄ PAGE gel of the binding proteins ofdicalcin was
faint, this result also suggested that the content of
annexin A4 in the 35 kDa proteins was small even if
it was present. For these reasons, we did not study
annexin A4 further.
Identification of annexin A1, annexin A2 and
annexin A5 as the binding proteins of dicalcin
Our results were so far consistent with the notion that
the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins are annexin A1,
annexin A2, and annexin A5. However, we were not
totally sure of this at this stage. Therefore, we first
tried to confirm that annexin A1, annexin A2 and an-
nexin A5 show Ca
2+
-dependent binding to dicalcin, as
the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins do. For this, we
obtained recombinant annexin A1, annexin A2 and
annexin A5 expressed in Escherichia coli. The apparent
molecular masses of recombinant annexin A1 and ann-
exin A2 were both 38 kDa, and that of annexin A5
was 35 kDa (Fig. 2), and all of them bound to the di-
calcin-Sepharose beads in a Ca
2+
-dependent manner
(Fig. 2), as the native 38 kDa and 35 kDa proteins do.
Second, we identified the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa pro-
teins as annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 immu-
nologically. We raised specific antiserum against
annexin A1, annexin A2 or annexin A5 in mouse and
rabbit using recombinant annexins (supplementary
Fig. S2). Antiserum against annexin A1 recognized both
the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins (Fig. 3A, low Ca
2+
eluate), and antiserum against annexin A2 also detected
the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins. Antiserum against
annexin A5 detected only the 35 kDa proteins.
From the above results, it became evident that the
38 kDa proteins contained both full-length annexin A1
and annexin A2, and the 35 kDa proteins contained
full-length annexin A5 together with proteolytic
fragments of annexin A1 and annexin A2. Our two-
dimensional electrophoresis confirmed this (Fig. 3B).
This two-dimensional analysis also indicated that pro-
teins other than annexin A1, annexin A2 and annex-
in A5 were not present in significant amounts in the
38 kDa and 35 kDa proteins (Fig. 3B). In Fig. 3B,
there are weak signals of annexin A1 at around
pH 5.1. They are probably the signals of annexin A1
that was not focused in our two-dimensional electro-
phoresis.
Fig. 2. Ca
2+
-dependent binding of recombinant annexins to dicalcin.
The cell lysate of E. coli (lysate) expressing recombinant annex-
in A1, annexin A2 or annexin A5 was mixed with dicalcin-Sepha-
rose beads at 1 m
M Ca
2+
. The beads were washed 10 times by
centrifugation with K-gluc buffer supplemented with 1 m
M Ca
2+
,
and the 1st and the 10th extracts were subjected to SDS ⁄ PAGE
(high-Ca
2+
wash 1 and high-Ca
2+
wash 10). The beads were finally
washed with K-gluc buffer supplemented with 5 m
M EGTA, and
the extract was subjected to SDS ⁄ PAGE (low-Ca
2+
wash).
T. Uebi et al. Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactory cilia
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4865
Colocalization ofannexinsanddicalcinin frog
olfactory andrespiratory epithelium
Dicalcin has been reported to localize in the cilia of
frog olfactoryandrespiratory epithelium [7]. To
understand the possible association of annexin A1,
annexin A2 and annexin A5 with the function of dical-
cin, we examined the colocalization of each annexin
with dicalcin, using specific antisera (supplementary
Fig. S2). In addition, we also examined whether differ-
ent subtypes of the annexins colocalize in the same
cilia. Figures 4 and 5 show the immunohistochemical
studies ofdicalcinand annexin A1, annexin A2 and
annexin A5. In Fig. 4, the olfactory cilia, which were
identified immunohistochemically witholfactory cilia-
specific G
olf
antibody (Fig. 4M), were found to be
reactive to antiserum against dicalcin (Fig. 4A,D,G).
The cilia were also positively stained with antiserum
against annexin A1 (Fig. 4B), annexin A2 (Fig. 4E),
and annexin A5 (Fig. 4H). The merged image clearly
showed colocalization ofdicalcinwith each of the an-
nexins (Fig. 4C,F,I). In this study, the conditions for
obtaining immunofluorescence were kept constant in
each of the observations with rabbit antiserum (Texas
Red) or mouse antiserum (fluorescein isothiocyanate),
and therefore the color in the merged picture was
dependent on the relative intensities of red and green
fluorescence, namely, the titers of antisera against di-
calcin and annexins. Preabsorption of the specific anti-
bodies by recombinant proteins significantly reduced
the signals (Miwa et al. [13] for anti-dicalcin serum
and Fig. 4N for anti-annexin A2 serum).
Because all the annexins examined in this study co-
localized with dicalcin, we then examined whether ann-
exin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 all colocalize in
the same cell. Figure 5 shows the immunohistochemi-
cal study of colocalization of annexin A1, annexin A2,
and annexin A5. For any combination of these three
subtypes of annexin, colocalization was demonstrated
(Fig. 5). Therefore, it was evident that all three sub-
types of annexin are present in the same olfactory
cilium. From the results in Figs 4 and 5, it became
evident that dicalcin, annexin A1, annexin A2 and
annexin A5 all colocalize in the same olfactory cilium.
In the respiratory epithelium, similar colocalization
was observed (supplementary Fig. S3), although the
signal of G
olf
, a marker protein ofolfactory cells, was
not seen.
Estimation of the relative molecular abundance
of dicalcinandannexinsinfrogolfactory cilia
The above immunohistochemical study showed that all
subtypes of the annexins studied here colocalize with
AB
Fig. 3. Identification of annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 by western blot analysis. (A) Determination that the 38 kDa proteins are a
mixture of annexin A1 and A2 and that the 35 kDa proteins are a mixture of annexin A5 and proteolytic fragments of annexin A1 and annex-
in A2. Purified recombinant annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 (A1, A2 and A5), together with the binding proteins ofdicalcin (low-Ca
2+
eluate), were electrophoresed on an SDS ⁄ PAGE gel, and the proteins were stained with silver (silver stain). The proteins were probed with
specific antisera against annexins (anti-A1, anti-A2 and anti-A5) by western blot. The 38 kDa proteins contained both annexin A1 and annex-
in A2, and the 35 kDa proteins contained annexin A5 together with annexin A1 and annexin A2, possibly fragmented by proteolysis during
preparation. (B) Two-dimensional electrophoretic identification of the 38 kDa and the 35 kDa proteins as annexin A1, annexin A2, and annex-
in A5. A similar analysis as in (A) was performed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Annexins were identified at the apparent molecular
mass of 38 kDa with pI values of 6.2–7.1 (annexin A1), andof c. 8 (annexin A2), and a single spot at 35 kDa with pI ¼ 5.6 (annexin A5).
Each annexin subtype is indicated by a circle.
Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia T. Uebi et al.
4866 FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
dicalcin infrogolfactory cilia. To understand the sig-
nificance of this colocalization, we tried to estimate the
relative molecular abundance ofdicalcinand annexins.
In this quantification, we used both the soluble and
the membrane fraction after detachment of the cilia
(see Experimental procedures). They were solubilized
with the SDS ⁄ PAGE sample buffer, and were directly
electrophoresed with known amounts of recombinant
dicalcin and annexins. The contents ofannexins and
dicalcin in the cilia were estimated by western blot,
and their ratio determined in three frogs was annex-
in A1 ⁄ annexin A2 ⁄ annexin A5 ⁄ dicalcin ¼ 1.0 : 0.42 ±
0.09 : 0.54 ± 0.15 : 1.9 ± 0.6. Dicalcin is a soluble
protein, andannexins were mostly present in the
Chaps-solubilized fraction. Dicalcin might have been
lost during isolation of the olfactory epithelium, and
therefore the content ofdicalcin could be higher than
the value determined above. Because the number and
the volume of the ciliain the sample were not known,
it was not possible to determine the actual concentra-
tions of these proteins.
Effect ofdicalcin on the activity of annexins
As has been reported previously, annexins are known
to induce membrane aggregation in a Ca
2+
-dependent
manner [14], and it is also known that this activity of
annexins is enhanced by binding of S100 proteins [15].
We therefore examined the effect ofdicalcin on
the membrane aggregation activity of annexins. The
ABC
DEF
GHI
JKL
MNO
Fig. 4. Colocalization ofdicalcinwith annexin A1, annexin A2 or annexin A5 infrogolfactory epithelium. (A–I) Immunofluorescence double-
staining ofdicalcinand annexins. A section was treated with rabbit anti-dicalcin serum (red; A, D and G) and mouse antiserum raised against
one subtype of annexin (green: B, annexin A1; E, annexin A2; H, annexin A5). The corresponding images were merged (merged; C, F and I).
(J–L) Controls. A section for controls was treated with normal serum of rabbit (J) and mouse (K), and the images were merged (L). (M) A
representative section treated with antibody to G
olf
. All positive signals against dicalcin, annexinsand G
olf
were observed in the cilia layer
(arrowheads). (N) A control. Antiserum against annexin A2 was preabsorbed with recombinant annexin A2. (O) Frogolfactory epithelium
stained with toluidine blue. Bars indicate 20 lm in (L) (applicable to A–N) and 50 lm in (O).
T. Uebi et al. Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactory cilia
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4867
activity was measured as the increase in the absorbance
due to aggregation of phosphatidylserine liposomes
(see inset in Fig. 6E, for example). The dose effect of
each of the annexinsin the presence or absence of di-
calcin was examined (Fig. 6A). Annexin A1 and annex-
in A2 alone increased liposome aggregation similarly in
a dose-dependent manner (filled rectangles and filled
circles, respectively). Dicalcin increased their activities,
and the effect was higher on annexin A2 (open circles)
than on annexin A1 (open rectangles). Annexin A5 did
not show liposome aggregation activity (open and filled
triangles). Although the effect ofdicalcin was obvious
at annexin concentrations above 40 nm, the increase in
the absorbance was often too rapid for reliable data to
be obtained. For this reason, we used annexins at low
concentrations. The concentrations ofannexins were
kept at 12.5 nm (annexin A1), 5 nm (annexin A2) and
7.5 nm (annexin A5) throughout the measurement,
based on the relative molecular abundance of annex-
ins in the cilia, i.e. annexin A1 : annexin A2 : annex-
in A5 ¼ 1.0 : 0.42 : 0.54 (see above). Dicalcin was
added in excess.
The effect ofdicalcin on liposome aggregation
induced by annexins was measured at various Ca
2+
concentrations, and the initial rate of increase was
plotted as a function of Ca
2+
concentrations. As
shown in Fig. 6B, no significant aggregation was
observed in the absence ofannexins (filled triangles) or
dicalcin (open triangles). In the absence of liposomes,
no significant increase in absorbance was detected (not
shown). In the presence ofannexins alone, slight
aggregation was observed, but the effect was not so
large (filled circles in Fig. 6B–E) at the annexin con-
centrations used (see above). When dicalcin was
present (open circles), the liposome aggregation activi-
ties of annexin A1 or annexin A2 were facilitated
ABC
DEF
GHI
JKL
Fig. 5. Colocalization of annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 infrogolfactory epithelium. (A–I) Immunofluorescence double-staining of
one subtype of annexin with the other subtype of annexin. A section was treated with rabbit antiserum raised against one subtype of annex-
in (red: A, annexin A1; D, annexin A5; G, annexin A5) and mouse antiserum raised against the other subtype of annexin (green: B, annex-
in A2; E, annexin A1; H, annexin A2). The corresponding images were merged (C, F, I). (J–L) Controls. A section for controls was treated
with normal serum of rabbit (J) and mouse (K), and the images were merged (L). Positive signals were observed only in the cilia layer
(arrowhead).
Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia T. Uebi et al.
4868 FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
greatly when the Ca
2+
concentration was increased
(Fig. 6B,C). Essentially, the effect ofdicalcin was not
seen with annexin A5 (Fig. 6D).
The effective Ca
2+
concentrations depended on the
subtype of annexin: annexin A2 was more sensitive to
Ca
2+
than annexin A1. The half-maximal dicalcin
effect was observed at < 5 lm Ca
2+
with annexin A2,
but at about 30 lm with annexin A1. Although the ini-
tial rate of aggregation increased to a similar level for
both annexin A1 and annexin A2 at high Ca
2+
con-
centrations (Fig. 6B,C), this was partly because of the
difference in the concentrations used (12.5 nm annex-
in A1 vs. 5 nm annexin A2; see above). When the con-
centration of annexin A2 was increased to the same
level as that of annexin A1, the effect ofdicalcin was
at least two times larger for annexin A2 than for
annexin A1 (Fig. 6A).
To simulate the effect ofdicalcinin a cell, dicalcin
was added to the mixture of annexin A1, annexin A2
and annexin A5 according to their ratios of the con-
centrations in the cilia (see above). The observed acti-
vity (Fig. 6E, filled lines) was equal to the calculated
sum of each of the activities of annexin A1, annex-
in A2 and annexin A5 (Fig. 6E, thick dotted lines).
Binding of truncated forms of annexins
to dicalcin
In the present study, we found that dicalcin binds to
annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5, and that it
facilitates the membrane aggregation activities of ann-
exin A1 and annexin A2. In mammal S100 proteins
and annexins, an S100–annexin complex is formed in
a subtype-specific manner: S100A10 binds to annex-
in A2 [16], and S100A11 binds to annexin A1 [17]. In
the case of mammal annexin A1 and annexin A2, the
specificity has been reported to arise in part at their
N-terminal 1–13 amino acids [18,19]. Because dicalcin
binds to both annexin A1 and annexin A2, in addi-
tion to annexin A5, as shown in this study, the bind-
ing sites ofdicalcinand those offrogannexins could
be different from those known previously. To test this
possibility, we examined the binding to dicalcin of
Fig. 6. Effect ofdicalcin on liposome aggregation induced by an-
nexins. Time courses of annexin-induced liposome aggregation
were measured as the increase in the absorbance at 350 nm [see
inset in (E)]. In (A), the time course was measured at various con-
centrations of annexin in the presence (open symbols) and absence
(filled symbols) of 200 n
M dicalcin at 100 lM Ca
2+
. The initial rate of
the absorbance increase was plotted against the annexin concen-
tration. In (B)–(E), liposome aggregation was measured at various
Ca
2+
concentrations in the presence (open circles) and absence
(filled circles) ofdicalcin (DC). The initial rate of the absorbance
increase was plotted against the Ca
2+
concentration [annexin A1 in
(B), annexin A2 in (C), annexin A5 in (D), annexin A1 + annex-
in A2 + annexin A5 in (E)]. Data points represent mean ± standard
error determined in two different preparations (n ¼ 3 in each prepa-
ration). For controls, the result withdicalcin but no annexins pres-
ent (open triangles) and that with neither dicalcin nor annexins
(filled triangles) are shown in (B). These two controls are shown as
thin dotted lines in (C) and (D). The result obtained in the presence
of dicalcinand all of the annexins (E) was compared with the calcu-
lated sum of each of the initial rates obtained in (B)–(D) (thick dot-
ted lines).
T. Uebi et al. Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactory cilia
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4869
N-terminal-truncated forms offrog annexin A1 and
annexin A2. The result showed that, indeed, dicalcin
binds to these truncated forms (Fig. 7A), which indi-
cated that the N-terminal region is not essential for
the interactionoffrog annexin A1 and annexin A2
with dicalcin. Consistently, we observed that the
35 kDa forms of annexin A1 and annexin A2 found
in the fraction of the binding proteins of dicalcin
(Fig. 1) were the N-terminal-truncated annexins
(Fig. 7B).
Discussion
In the present study, we showed that the major bind-
ing proteins ofdicalcininfrogolfactory epithelium are
annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 (Figs 1–3
and supplementary Fig. S1). The binding does not
require the N-terminal region ofannexins (Fig. 7). Di-
calcin and all these annexins colocalize in the olfactory
and respiratorycilia (Figs 4 and 5 and supplementary
Fig. S3). Dicalcin was found to increase the rate of
liposome aggregation caused by annexins (Fig. 6).
Specificity of the binding between dicalcin and
annexins
In the present study, we identified the 38 kDa and the
35 kDa proteins as annexin A1, annexin A2 and ann-
exin A5. Annexins are known to bind to a dimer
form of S100 proteins. In mammals, the binding
between annexinsand S100 dimer proteins has been
shown to be subtype-specific. S100A11 binds to annex-
in A1 [17] (but see [20] also), and S100A10 binds to
annexin A2 [16]. Because dicalcinin frogs shows the
highest amino acid sequence homology to S100A11
(45–58%), the binding ofdicalcin to annexin A1 is not
surprising. However, binding to all of annexin A1,
annexin A2 and annexin A5 is a rather unique charac-
teristic of dicalcin, although similar comprehensive
binding has been suggested for some of the S100 pro-
teins [11]. The comprehensive binding ofdicalcin to
various subtypes of annexin could be due to the char-
acteristics offrogannexinsand ⁄ or dicalcin (see below).
Annexin consists of two domains, the N-terminal
region and the C-terminal protein core. Although the
N-terminal region has been suggested to be responsible
for the binding to S100 proteins [21], the N-terminal
truncated forms of annexin A1 and annexin A2 bind
to dicalcin (Fig. 7). The binding of these forms sug-
gests that these annexins bind to dicalcin not with the
N-terminal regions but with the sites that have not yet
been identified in their core domains.
In S100A10 and S100A11, the amino acid residues
contacting the corresponding annexins are known [22–
24]. In dicalcin, several of them are conserved (supple-
mentary Fig. S4). The amino acids thought to give the
subtype-specificity of S100 binding to annexin are also
known [25]. However, these residues indicalcin are dif-
ferent from those in S100A10 or S100A11 (supplemen-
tary Fig. S4), which suggests that the specificity of
binding ofdicalcin to annexins is not so strict.
From the above considerations, we speculate that
the binding between annexinsanddicalcin occurs via
the interaction between the conserved amino acids in
dicalcin and the still unknown site in the core domain
of annexin. Because annexin A5 lacks the correspond-
ing N-terminal region of annexin A1 or annexin A2
(supplementary Fig. S1), it would not be surprising if
frog annexin A5 bound to dicalcin. Recombinant frog
annexin A4, which also lacks the corresponding N-ter-
minal region, also showed Ca
2+
-dependent binding to
dicalcin (data not shown). Similarly, as in the present
study, it was reported recently that the N-terminus of
A
B
Fig. 7. Ca
2+
-dependent binding to dicalcinof N-terminal region-trun-
cated annexin A1 and annexin A2. (A) Recombinant annexin A1 and
annexin A2 were truncated at their N-termini with elastase and chy-
motrypsin, respectively, and mixed with dicalcin-Sepharose beads.
The truncated annexin A1 and annexin A2 bound to the beads at a
high Ca
2+
concentration, but they were eluted by reducing the Ca
2+
concentration (low-Ca
2+
wash). (B) Amino acid sequence analysis
showed that the proteolytic fragments used in (A) lacked the N-ter-
minal regions. Arrowheads show the sites cleaved and the mole-
cular masses of the rest of the cleaved peptides. Arrows show the
N-termini of the 35 kDa forms of annexin A1 and annexin A2.
Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia T. Uebi et al.
4870 FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
annexin 6 is not required for the interactionof annexin
6 with S100A11 [26].
Colocalization ofdicalcinand annexins
in the cilia
We previously reported that dicalcin is present in the
olfactory and the respiratorycilia [7]. Expression of
S100 proteins has been reported in the olfactory epi-
thelium in teleosts and rodents [27,28], andin the cilia
of human bronchial epithelial cells [29]. Annexins have
been detected in the tissues containing ciliated cells:
the respiratory epithelium [30,31] and bronchial epithe-
lial cells [29]. So far, however, localization of annexins
in the olfactorycilia has not been reported, and there-
fore, this is the first report that annexin A1, annex-
in A2 and annexin A5 are expressed in the cilia of
olfactory cells. In the present study, we showed that
dicalcin, annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 co-
localize in the olfactory cilia. Because ciliated cells
seem to express both S100 proteins and annexins, our
result could apply to cells that contain motile cilia in
general.
Annexin A1, annexin A2, annexin A5 and dicalcin
are present in the olfactorycilia at a ratio of
1 : 0.42 ± 0.09 : 0.54 ± 0.15 : 1.9 ± 0.6, and dicalcin
may be present in greater amounts (see Results). A
molecular modeling study showed that the structure of
dicalcin is similar to that of an S100 dimer [8]. Because
a dimer form of S100 protein binds two annexin mole-
cules [21], one dicalcin molecule would bind to two
molecules of annexins. If it is the case, the amount of
dicalcin is stoichiometrically sufficient to form com-
plexes with annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5.
Facilitation by dicalcinof membrane aggregation
induced by annexins
The half-maximal dicalcin effects were observed at
<5 lm Ca
2+
with annexin A2 and at about 30 lm
with annexin A1 (Fig. 6). These Ca
2+
concentrations
are the effective ranges of annexin A2 and annexin A1
of other animal species [32]. The dissociation constant
of Ca
2+
binding to dicalcin has been reported to be
10–20 lm [12]. A simple expectation, therefore, was
that the Ca
2+
concentration effective for liposome
aggregation in the presence of annexin A2 and dicalcin
would be determined by dicalcin, which shows lower
affinity for Ca
2+
than does annexin A2. Similarly, one
could expect that the effective Ca
2+
concentration in
the presence of annexin A1 anddicalcin would be
determined by annexin A1. However, the results were
different from what we expected. The effective Ca
2+
concentrations did not change significantly in the
presence or absence of dicalcin. The results indicated
that the Ca
2+
dependency of liposome aggregation in
the presence ofdicalcin is determined by annexins, not
by dicalcin. The result therefore suggested that there is
cooperative regulation of Ca
2+
binding to dicalcin by
annexins. The increase in the degree of Ca
2+
binding
in the presence of binding proteins is known for
S100A4 [33] and has been suggested for S100A11 [34].
We measured liposome aggregation in a mixture of
dicalcin, annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5
(Fig. 6D). The observed liposome aggregation profile
could be explained by the sum of each of the constitu-
ents in the mixture. In this study, we mixed all of these
proteins at once. If, as we assumed, dicalcin binds to
two molecules of annexin, a dicalcin molecule would
be able to bind two annexin molecules of different sub-
types, such as annexin A1 plus annexin A2, and ann-
exin A1 plus annexin A5. However, the aggregation
profile obtained in the mixture could be explained by
the sum of the results obtained independently using
single species of annexin. This result suggests that even
when all of the annexins are present in the mixture,
annexins of a homomeric pair, not a heteromeric one,
tend to bind to dicalcin to form a complex.
Possible physiologic functions of dicalcin
and annexinsin the cilia
It has been estimated that the intracellular Ca
2+
con-
centration in the olfactorycilia is about 40 nm at the
resting level, and increases to higher levels after
odorant stimulation [35]. Inrespiratory cilia, the intra-
cellular Ca
2+
concentration increases up to a sub-
micromolar level at the maximum [36]. The range of
Ca
2+
concentration where the dicalcin–annexin com-
plex has an effect seems to be higher than these ‘physi-
ologic’ Ca
2+
concentrations. Therefore, we believe that
the dicalcin–annexin complex exerts its effect when the
Ca
2+
concentration is abnormally increased. The cell
membranes of motile cilia are subject to mechanical
stress and are often disrupted [37]. In addition to this,
the olfactorycilia are exposed to environmental chemi-
cals, microorganisms and viruses, etc., so that the cil-
ium membrane is likely to be damaged. In these cases,
the cytoplasmic Ca
2+
concentration at the disrupted
site could possibly be quite high. Because (a) the effec-
tive Ca
2+
concentrations are different between annex-
in A1 and annexin A2 (Fig. 6), (b) dicalcin is present
in a quantity sufficient to bind all of the annexins (see
Results), and (c) all these molecules colocalize in the
same cilia (Figs 4 and 5), it is possible that the dical-
cin–annexin system could cover a wide range of Ca
2+
T. Uebi et al. Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactory cilia
FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS 4871
concentrations inside the cell to reseal the disrupted
membranes. It has been reported that annexin A1 [38]
and annexin A1 and annexin A2 [39] have important
roles in membrane repair.
Annexin A5 did not show liposome aggregation
activity, in agreement with the findings of a previous
study [14], even in the presence ofdicalcin (Fig. 6D).
Because antibody against annexin A5 has been reported
to inhibit the survival of oxidation-damaged cells [40],
the dicalcin–annexin A5 complex may possibly contri-
bute to a recovery process after chemical damage.
Dicalcin in other species
So far, we have found dicalcinin Rana catesbeiana [6]
and Xenopus laevis [5]. In addition, the sequence of
dicalcin mRNA of X. tropicalis has been registered in
a database (NM_001016706). Thus, dicalcin has been
found only in the three species of frogs. The Mexican
salamander, Ambystoma mexicanum, has an S100A11-
like protein with an insertion of four amino acid resi-
dues in its C-terminal half EF hand (supplementary
Fig. S3), and this insertion is characteristically observed
in dicalcin. Nevertheless, this S100A11-like protein is a
monomer form of an S100 protein and is not like dical-
cin. Therefore, dicalcin might be derived from a unique
S100 protein of ancestral amphibia, and could be a
frog-specific protein. Members of the Caudata, includ-
ing the Mexican salamander, have a tendency to stay
either in an aquatic or a terrestrial environment. In
contrast, most frogs are more biphasic, and actively
move between land and water. Because the olfactory
motile ciliain these frogs could be exposed to vigorous
mechanical stress very often, they might have needed to
have a very effective membrane repair system. Dicalcin,
a homodimer form of S100 proteins, could be the form
of S100 protein that exerts this effect most efficiently.
Experimental procedures
Solutions
The standard buffer solution contained 115 mm potassium
gluconate, 2.5 mm KCl, and 10 mm Hepes (pH 7.5) (K-gluc
buffer). Low-salt K-gluc buffer (LS-K-gluc buffer) con-
tained 50 mm potassium gluconate and 20 mm Hepes
(pH 7.5). Either 1 mm CaCl
2
or 5 mm EGTA was added to
the LS-K-gluc buffer. Ringer’s solution contained 115 mm
NaCl, 3 mm KCl, 2 mm MgCl
2
,2mm CaCl
2
,10mm glu-
cose, and 5 mm Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 7.5). Tris-buffered saline
(NaCl ⁄ Tris) contained 0.9% NaCl and 100 mm Tris ⁄ HCl
(pH 7.5). NaCl ⁄ P
i
contained 137 mm NaCl, 2.7 mm KCl,
8.1 mm Na
2
HPO
4
, and 1.5 mm NaH
2
PO
4
(pH 7.4).
Preparation of Chaps-solubilized proteins of the
olfactory cilia
Animal care was carried out in accordance with the institu-
tional guidelines of Osaka University.
Partially purified cilia from frogolfactory epithelium
were obtained as described previously [13]. Briefly, olfactory
cilia were detached from the epithelia by abruptly raising
the Ca
2+
concentration to 10 mm. The deciliated epithelia
were removed by brief centrifugation (1500 g, 5 min;
TOMY MRX-150, TMA-11 rotor, TOMY SEIKO, Tokyo,
Japan), and the supernatant containing the cilia was further
centrifuged at 12 000 g for 15 min (TOMY MRX-150,
TMA-11 rotor). The supernatant was removed and used as
the soluble protein fraction offrogolfactory epithelium.
The resulting pellet containing the isolated cilia was washed
twice with K-gluc buffer, resuspended in LS-K-gluc buffer
containing 4% Chaps, and kept at 4 °C overnight to solubi-
lize the membrane-associated proteins of the isolated cilia.
The Chaps-solubilized proteins were then obtained in the
supernatant after centrifugation at 440 000 g for 5 min
(Hitachi CS100, RP100AT4 rotor, Hitachi Koki, Tokyo,
Japan). The supernatant was diluted with LS-K-gluc buffer
containing 1 mm Ca
2+
so that the concentration of Chaps
was reduced to 0.05%. The diluted fraction was centrifuged
at 12 000 g for 30 min (TOMY MRX-150, TMA-11 rotor)
to remove any precipitates before subjecting it to affinity
column chromatography as described below. A cocktail
of protease inhibitors (leupeptin, 5 lgÆmL
)1
; phenyl-
methanesulfonyl fluoride, 5 lgÆmL
)1
; aprotinin, 5 lgÆmL
)1
;
bestatin, 40 lgÆmL
)1
) was present at the indicated final con-
centrations during the preparation of the above fraction.
Affinity purification of binding proteins of
dicalcin
A dicalcin-Sepharose column was prepared as previously
described [13]. Chaps-solubilized proteins of the isolated
cilia were loaded on the dicalcin-Sepharose column pre-
equilibrated with LS-K-gluc buffer containing 1 m m CaCl
2
and 0.05% Chaps. After elution of unbound proteins, pro-
teins that were bound to the column at 1 mm Ca
2+
were
eluted by reducing the Ca
2+
concentration with LS-K-gluc
buffer containing 5 mm EGTA and 0.05% Chaps. In some
studies, K-gluc buffer was used instead of LS-K-gluc buffer
to isolate the binding proteins, but no significant differences
were observed in the detected proteins.
Determination of partial amino acid sequences
of binding proteins of dicalcin
Purified binding proteins ofdicalcin were digested with
lysyl endopeptidase (Wako, Osaka, Japan) at an
enzyme ⁄ substrate ratio of 1 : 100 in 1 mL of a Tris buffer
solution (100 mm Tris, pH 9.2) overnight at 37 °C. The
Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia T. Uebi et al.
4872 FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4863–4876 ª 2007 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
[...]... annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 with those of mammalian orthologs Fig S2 Specificity of antisera against dicalcinandannexins Fig S3 Colocalization ofdicalcinwith annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 infrogrespiratory epithelium Fig S4 Alignment of amino acid sequences of Rana catesbeiana dicalcinwith those of S100 proteins This material is available as part of the online article from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com... described previously [6] Recombinant annexins were affinity-purified with a dicalcin- Sepharose column in a similar way as used for the isolation of native annexins Binding of recombinant annexins to dicalcin Transformed E coli cells expressing each of the annexins were suspended and sonicated in K-gluc buffer The lysate was centrifuged at 27 000 g for 15 min (Hitachi CR21, R20A2 rotor), and 1 mm CaCl2 was then... Identification of a novel interaction between the Ca2+-binding protein S, 100A, 11 and the Ca2+- and phospholipid-binding protein annexin A6 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292, C1417–C1430 Yamashita N, Ilg EC, Schafer BW, Heizmann CW & ¨ Kosaka T (1999) Distribution of a specific calcium-binding protein of the S100 protein family, S100A6 (calcyclin), in subpopulations of neurons and glial cells of the adult... (annexin A2), 7.5 nm (annexin A1), and 40 nm (dicalcin) , so that the ratio of the concentration ofannexins was similar to that in the olfactorycilia (see Results section), but dicalcin was added in excess Acknowledgements We thank Dr H Matsumoto at the University of Oklahoma and Dr H Kurono at Kurume University for MS analysis of the binding proteins at the initial stage of this study This research... again under the same conditions to remove aggregated proteins, and a portion of the supernatant was mixed with dicalcinSepharose beads in K-gluc buffer containing 1 mm CaCl2 Role ofdicalcininfrogolfactorycilia for 30 min at 4 °C After the mixture had been centrifuged (7000 g, 1 min; TOMY MRX-150, TMA-11 rotor), the supernatant was discarded The dicalcin- Sepharose beads were then washed 10 times with. .. role of the dysferlin interacting proteins annexin A1 and A2 in muscular dystrophies Hum Mutat 26, 283 Han S, Zhang KH, Lu PH & Xu XM (2004) Effects ofannexins II and V on survival of neurons and astrocytes in vitro Acta Pharmacol Sin 25, 602–610 Huang K-S, McGray P, Mattaliano RJ, Burne CE, Chow P, Sinclair LK & Pepinsky RB (1987) Purification and characterization of proteolytic fragments of lipocortin... containing 1 mm CaCl2 Proteins bound to dicalcin- Sepharose beads at a high Ca2+ concentration were then eluted with K-gluc buffer containing 5 mm EGTA When truncated annexins were used, annexin A1 and annexin A2 were digested with elastase and chymotrypsin, respectively These enzymes are known to cleave the N-terminal regions of annexin A1 and annexin A2 [18,41], respectively The cleaved sites in these... Antisera against annexin A1, annexin A2 and annexin A5 were raised in both rabbit and mouse, and antiserum against dicalcin was raised in rabbit Golf antibody raised in rabbit was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) For double staining, sections were reacted first with antiserum or antibody raised in rabbit overnight at 4 °C, and then were further reacted with antiserum raised in mouse... calcium- and phospholipid-binding proteins Biochim Biophys Acta 1197, 63–93 Dukhanina EA, Dukhanin AS, Lomonosov MY, Lukanidin EM & Georgiev GP (1997) Spectral studies on the calcium-binding properties of Mts1 protein and its interactionwith target protein FEBS Lett 410, 403–406 Allen BG, Durussel I, Walsh MP & Cox JA (1996) Characterization of the Ca2+-binding properties of calgizzarin (S100C) isolated... collected, and the amino acid sequences of the peptides in these fractions were analyzed with a protein sequencer (G1000A; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) Isolation of annexin cDNA clones Screening in the frogolfactory epithelium cDNA library to isolate annexin cDNAs was carried out in a similar way as described previously [6] On the basis of either the partial amino acid sequences ofannexins determined . 4865
Colocalization of annexins and dicalcin in frog
olfactory and respiratory epithelium
Dicalcin has been reported to localize in the cilia of
frog olfactory and respiratory. aggregation.
Results
Purification of binding proteins of dicalcin
Binding proteins of dicalcin were searched for among
the soluble and membrane-associated proteins of frog
olfactory cilia.