Báo cáo khoa học: Active site residue involvement in monoamine or diamine oxidation catalysed by pea seedling amine oxidase doc

Active site residue involvement in monoamine or diamine oxidation catalysed by pea seedling amine oxidase Maria Luisa Di Paolo 1 , Michele Lunelli 2 , Monika Fuxreiter 2,3 , Adelio Rigo 1 , Istvan Simon 3 and Marina Scarpa 2 1 Dipartimento di Chimica Biologica and INBB, Universita ` di Padova, Padova, Italy 2 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita ` di Trento, Trento, Italy 3 Institute of Enzymology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary Introduction Copper amine oxidases (CuAOs; EC 1.4.3.6) are wide- spread in nature, being present in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. They are homodimers, each subunit containing a copper and a redox cofactor, 2,4,5-trihydroxyphenylalanine quinone (TPQ) [1]. CuAOs catalyse the oxidative deamination of primary amines to the corresponding aldehydes, according to the overall reaction: RCH 2 NH þ 3 þ O 2 þ H 2 O ! RCHO þ NH þ 4 þ H 2 O 2 Catalysis occurs by a ping-pong mechanism, in which the amine is converted to the product aldehyde while reducing the enzyme cofactor (reductive half-reaction); this is followed by reoxidation of the cofactor by oxygen, which completes the catalytic cycle (oxidative half-reaction) [2]. To date, several amine oxidase crystal structures have been solved [3–10]. The structures for Escherichia coli (ECAO) [3], Pisum sativum (PSAO) [4], Arthro- bacter globiformis (AGAO) [5], Hansenula polimorpha (HPAO) [6], Pichia pastoris [7], bovine serum amine oxidase (BSAO) [8] and human semicarbazide sensitive amine oxidase [9,10] reveal the similarity of the overall fold of these enzymes from various sources and point to the importance of the channel involved in amine substrate binding. The domain including the catalytic region (called D4) exhibits a rather high sequence similarity. All these features may implicate a similar Keywords amine oxidase; substrate docking; substrate selectivity; substrate-dependent catalytic mechanism; titratable amino acids Correspondence M. Scarpa, Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Sommarive 14, 38050 Povo-Trento, Italy Fax: ++39 0461881696 Tel: ++39 0461882029 E-mail: marina.scarpa@unitn.it (Received 13 October 2010, revised 24 December 2010, accepted 2 February 2011) doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08044.x The structures of copper amine oxidases from various sources show good similarity, suggesting similar catalytic mechanisms for all members of this enzyme family. However, the optimal substrates for each member differ, depending on the source of the enzyme and its location. The structural fac- tors underlying substrate selectivity still remain to be discovered. With this in view, we examined the kinetic behaviour of pea seedling amine oxidase with cadaverine and hexylamine, the first bearing two, and the second only one, positively charged amino group. The dependence of K m and catalytic constant (k c ) values on pH, ionic strength and temperature indicates that binding of the monoamine is driven by hydrophobic interactions. Instead, binding of the diamine is strongly facilitated by electrostatic factors, con- trolled by polar side-chains and two titratable residues present in the active site. The position of the docked substrate is also essential for the participa- tion of titratable amino acid residues in the following catalytic steps. A new mechanistic model explaining the substrate-dependent kinetics of the reaction is discussed. Abbreviations AGAO, Arthrobacter globiformis amine oxidase; BSAO, bovine serum amine oxidase; CAD, cadaverine; CuAO, copper amine oxidase; ECAO, Escherichia coli amine oxidase; HEX, hexylamine; HPAO, Hansenula polimorpha amine oxidase; I, ionic strength;) k c , catalytic constant; PSAO, Pisum sativum amine oxidase; T, temperature; TPQ, 2,4,5-trihydroxyphenylalanine quinone. 1232 FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS catalytic mechanism for all members of the CuAO family. The pathway for the reductive half-reaction has been extensively studied, particularly for the ECAO [11,12], the HPAO [13] and the BSAO [14,15]. The fundamental reaction steps appear to be similar for enzymes from various sources [2,15,16]. In particu- lar, C-H cleavage of the intermediate Schiff base gen- erated upon amine substrate binding to TPQ appears to be a crucial step in the mechanism. Dependence of the kinetic isotope effect on pH [14], site-specific muta- tions at the active centre [17–19] and the crystal struc- ture of ECAO in complex with a covalently bound inhibitor [11], indicate that a fully conserved aspartate residue (Asp300 for PSAO) serves to abstract the pro- ton from the Schiff base. This residue also plays a role in ensuring the correct orientation of the cofactor dur- ing catalytic turnover [20]. In the course of nucleo- philic attack, the TPQ ring must be oriented with O5 pointing towards the general base [21], called the ‘pro- ductive’ conformation. A detailed theoretical study of the reductive half-reaction of PSAO suggests the possi- ble role of Lys296, located near TPQ, as a proton donor [22]. However, the conversion of amine to alde- hyde groups involves several proton transfer steps and more than one proton donor or acceptor residue is involved in catalysis. In spite of their structural simi- larities, the substrate specificities of CuAOs vary among enzymes from different sources. In fact, the best substrates for different CuAOs have different structure and charge distribution, indicating that sub- strate-specific interactions govern substrate binding. The molecular nature of the substrate entry channel controls substrate binding and subsequent catalysis for two HPAOs [23]. Electrostatic or hydrophobic forces have been suggested to drive polyamines (spermine and spermidine) and long-chain diamines, respectively, into the BSAO active site [24]. In contrast to the reductive half-cycle, the oxidative half-cycle is a matter of debate, and a reaction pathway has been proposed for plant enzymes, which differs in some steps from that for mammalian or bacterial enzymes. The oxida- tive half-cycle of plant enzymes is not rate-limiting [25,26] and a semiquinone state may be involved in the catalytic cycle [26,27]. Conversely, in the catalytic cycle of BSAO and HPAO, the one-electron reduction of di- oxygen is partially rate-limiting and involves electron transfer from reduced TPQ to produce superoxide anion, a reaction intermediate [28]. In this work, we examined the structural factors underlying substrate specificity and catalytic rates in copper amine oxidase from pea seedlings. We com- pared the kinetic behaviour of PSAO with two sub- strates – the diamine cadaverine (CAD) and the monoamine hexylamine (HEX) (structures shown in Fig. 1) – that are very different regarding affinities (K m ) and catalytic constants (k c ). The results from pH 567891011 k c (min –1 ) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 NH 3 + NH 3 + CADAVERINE NH 3 + CH 3 HEXYLAMINE CAD HEX pH 567891011 Log (1/K m ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 CAD HEX pH 5678910 Log (kcal·mol –1 ) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CAD HEX A B C Fig. 1. Effect of pH on kinetic parameters of the CAD (d) and HEX ( ) reductive half-reaction catalyzed by PSAO. (A) k c , (B) log(1 ⁄ K m ) and (C) log(k c ⁄ K m ), versus pH. Curves were obtained by fitting kinetic parameters to equations for k c and K m of CAD and HEX, as reported in the Discussion. The dashed line in panel C is a curve obtained fitting (k c ⁄ K m ) CAD according to Dixon’s approach (Eqn 11). The standard error was within 10% for k c and within 15% for K m (n = 3). M. L. Di Paolo et al. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS 1233 integration of kinetic studies with docking studies, and computation of the pK a values of the titratable resi- dues of the active site, suggest that the formation of the enzyme–substrate complex is precisely regulated by specific interactions. In particular, the binding of HEX to the active site is controlled by hydrophobic con- tacts, whereas the approach of CAD is facilitated by electrostatic factors, primarily dependent on residues Glu359 and Glu412. The difference in the binding mode of the two substrates may modulate the partici- pation of the residues surrounding TPQ in crucial cat- alytic steps. In this regard, we confirmed the role of Asp300 as a general base in the rate-limiting step of the reaction and indicated Lys296 as playing a sub- strate-dependent role in the prototropic shift accompa- nying cleavage of the C a -H bond. With the predicted pK a values, a new mechanistic model is proposed which can satisfactorily explain substrate-dependent variations in the kinetic data. Results A steady-state approach was followed to obtain the kinetic parameters of PSAO with CAD and HEX as substrates. In particular, the dependence of kinetic constants on pH, ionic strength and temperature was studied to elucidate the electrostatic factors that affect substrate specificity. Steady-state kinetic experiments were performed in air-equilibrated solutions at 27 °C. In these conditions, the rate cannot be affected by the co-substrate O 2 because the saturation level for O 2 has been reached. In fact, the concentration of O 2 was about 0.25 mm [29] and the K m (O 2 ) values were much lower: the K m (O 2 ) was calculated as 17 ± 5 lm when CAD was used as the saturating amine substate and the K m (O 2 ) was calculated to be lower than 2 lm when HEX was used as the saturating amine, at pH 7.2 (Fig. S1). These low K m (O 2 ) values match those obtained with putrescine and benzylamine as sub- strates, respectively [26]. In addition, according to the rate constant values for the individual steps reported by Padiglia et al. [30] for lentil seedling CuAO and to the kinetic isotope effect reported for PSAO [26], the oxidative half-cycle is not rate-limiting in air-saturated solutions and the reductive half-cycle is monitored. Effect of pH The dependence of k c , log(1 ⁄ K m ) and log(k c ⁄ K m ) val- ues on pH are shown in Fig. 1. In the pH range explored, the k c values of CAD are always higher than those of HEX, but become similar at a pH of > 9.5 (Fig 1A). For both substrates, k c profiles appear bell-shaped with the peaks centred at pH values of $ 7.2 and 9.3, respectively. Regarding the dependence of 1 ⁄ K m on pH, a bell-shaped curve with maximum values around pH 8.2 was found in the case of CAD, whereas the HEX K m value was independent of pH, within experimental error (Fig. 1B). The plots of log (k c ⁄ K m ) versus pH are bell-shaped profiles, with the maximum values centred at about pH 9 and 8 for CAD and HEX, respectively (Fig. 1C). Effect of ionic strength The effect of the ionic environment on the kinetics of the catalyzed oxidation of CAD and HEX was measured by varying the ionic strength (I) in the range 20–220 mm, at pH 7.20. Assuming that, for the enzyme–substrate system under investigation, 1 ⁄ K m is the equilibrium dissociation constant (this point will be discussed later), the electrostatic effects in PSAO catal- ysis were studied by varying the ionic strength, and the data were analysed according to the Debey-Huckel theory applied to both 1 ⁄ K m and k c [31]. The plots of log(k c ) and log(1 ⁄ K m ) versus (I) 1 ⁄ 2 were straight lines, which were fitted to the following equation: log k ¼ log k 0 þ 2C  z A  z B ðIÞ 1=2 ; ð1Þ where k 0 is a kinetic constant or the equilibrium disso- ciation constant at I = 0, and z A and z B are the over- all electrostatic charges of the interacting ionic species (the substrate and the active site). Constant C is $ 0.5 in water at 300 K [32]. Values for the (2*C*z a *z b ) term have been derived for both substrates and are listed in Table 1. As this term was found to be close to zero for HEX, the effect of pH on (2*C*z a *z b ) was tested for CAD only (see Table 1). The data for HEX suggested that both binding (1 ⁄ K m , see below for a detailed description) and chemical (k c ) steps of the catalysis are not controlled by ionic inter- actions. Conversely, in the case of CAD, a slope Table 1. Effect of ionic strength on k c and 1 ⁄ K m at various pH val- ues. Experimental values of k c and 1 ⁄ K m versus (I) 1 ⁄ 2 were fitted to Eqn (1) and values of the linear coefficient (2*C*z a *z b ) are reported. ND, not determined owing to the low K m value. Substrate (2*C*z a *z b ) pH From log(1 ⁄ K m ) data From log(k c ) data CAD )2.9 ± 0.2 )1.5 ± 0.3 7.2 )1.8 ± 0.4 )1.7 ± 0.1 6.0 ND )1.7 ± 0.1 9.2 HEX 0.2 ± 0.8 )0.1 ± 0.2 7.2 Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase M. L. Di Paolo et al. 1234 FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS [2*C*z a *z b = )3] from log(1⁄ K m ) data was obtained. The overall CAD charge (z a ) sensed by the environ- ment is reported to be z a $ 1.3 at pH 7.20 [33] and this value is expected to be independent of pH up to about pH 9, where the amino groups can be titrated. We may thus argue that the positively charged sub- strate senses an overall charge by about )2 when it binds into the active site (before the chemical step). At pH 6, the total negative charge of the active site is reduced (perhaps one negatively charged group is pro- tonated) and the slope of the plot of log(1 ⁄ K m ) versus (I) 1 ⁄ 2 decreases from about )3 to about )2. The 2*C*z a *z b of $ )1.6 found for the CAD substrate from log(k c ) data in the range of pH explored (pH 6.0–9.2) reflects the fact that the chemical steps of the reaction are affected by electrostatic interactions between the negative charges of the enzyme and the positive charge of the substrate. The amino group in the substrate tail, which is positively charged in the pH range explored, may facilitate the correct positioning of the tail and anchor the substrate at the beginning of the catalytic cycle. Effect of temperature The dependence of k c and 1 ⁄ K m on temperature, mea- sured in the range of 290–320 K at pH 7.20, 150 mm ionic strength, with CAD and HEX as substrates, indi- cates that these kinetic parameters increase with an increased temperature, with the exception of the 1 ⁄ K m value of CAD, which is independent of the tem- perature. According to the steady-state approach of Briggs and Haldane, k c is included in K m (K m = (k )1 + k c ) ⁄ k 1 ): hence, the independence of the K m of HEX from pH and that of the K m of CAD from tem- perature, and the strong dependence of k c values of both substrates on pH and temperature, suggests that k c << k )1 , which leads to K m @ (k )1 ⁄ k 1 ), that is, to the enzyme–substrate dissociation constant. The deute- rium kinetic isotope effects investigated by Mukherjee et al. [26] are consistent with this hypothesis. These authors observed a strong kinetic isotope effect on both k c and k c ⁄ K m with putrescine and benzylamine as substrates of PSAO (conversely, if K m contains k c , the kinetic isotope effect on k c ⁄ K m should vanish). Accord- ing to this hypothesis, from the dependence on temperature (T) of K m , we calculated the DH and DS accompanying the binding of substrate to enzyme according to the van’t Hoff equation. DH* and DS*, the enthalpy and entropy of activation accompanying the formation of the activated complex, were calcu- lated from the dependence of k c on T according to the transition state theory, and the resulting values are listed in Table 2. DH* increases with decreasing pH, whereas -TDS* decreases with decreasing pH, as shown by the DH* and -TDS* values plotted as a function of the pH (Fig. 2). Accordingly, the energy cost of the heterolytic cleavage of the C a -H bond is greater at higher H + concentrations, although entropy changes become less unfavourable. Interestingly, the DH* val- ues of CAD and HEX show better agreement in the high-pH range, where the neutral forms of these com- pounds predominate. Modelling of substrate–PSAO interactions Docking CAD into the active site revealed that the head amino group is located at the bottom of the nar- row channel and always forms hydrogen bonds with O5 of TPQ and the carboxylic group of Asp300. There are three stable conformations for CAD (Fig 3A–C). Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters of the reductive half-reac- tion of CAD and HEX by PSAO. Experiments were performed at pH 7.2 and 150 m M ionic strength by varying the temperature in the range 290–320 K. Values of the activation enthalpy (DH*) and the activation entropy (DS*) were calculated by fitting data of k c at various T to Eqn (12). Values of enthalpy (DH) and entropy (DS) change were obtained by fitting data of 1 ⁄ K m at various tempera- tures to Eqn (13). Substrate Enthalpy (kcalÆmol )1 ) Entropy (calÆmol )1 ÆK )1 ) DH* (from k c ) DH (from 1 ⁄ K m ) DS* (from k c ) DS (from 1 ⁄ K m ) CAD 9.1 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1 )25.3 24 HEX 10.9 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.4 )20.6 22 pH 56 78 910 Energy (kcal·mol –1 ) 4 6 8 10 12 14 ΔH # –TΔS # Fig. 2. Effect of pH on heats of activation and activation entropy for oxidative deamination catalyzed by PSAO. DH* and TDS* values at various pH values were obtained from ln k c versus 1 ⁄ T plots according to Eqn (12). DH* for CAD (d) and HEX (s), (-TDS*) for CAD ( ) and HEX (h). (-TDS*) values were calculated at 300K. M. L. Di Paolo et al. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS 1235 In the first stable conformation showing the lowest energy ()13.4 kcalÆmol )1 ) (Fig. 3A), the charged tail amino group is in contact with polar or negatively charged residues (Glu412 and Asn386, located at the bottom of the channel near TPQ). In the second stable conformation ()13.0 kcalÆmol )1 ), the amino group is located in a polar pocket composed of Gln108, Ser138 and Ser139 (Fig. 3B). A third stable conformation ()11.8 kcalÆmol )1 ) (Fig. 3C), albeit energetically less favoured, shows the CAD tail close to Ser138 and Tyr168, which is hydrogen-bonded to Glu359 of the other subunit; the hydroxyl group of Tyr168 can form a hydrogen bond with both Glu359 and the substrate. In all three conformations, the charged side-chain of Lys296 is stabilized by forming a salt bridge with Glu412, and the dihedral angle v 2 of Phe298 is about )85°, whereas it is about )30° in the original crystal structure. The docking simulation of HEX finds two stable conformations for this substrate with similar binding energy. In one conformation ()10.8 kcalÆmol )1 ; Fig. 3D), the head amino group of HEX is located between TPQ and Asp300, like CAD, and the dihedral angle v 2 of Phe298 is about )85°. The other conforma- tion ()10.9 kcalÆmol )1 ; Fig. 3E) shows the amino group far from Asp300, close to the other side of the TPQ ring, forming a salt bridge with Glu412 and the O4 of TPQ, and a hydrogen bond with Asn386. Unlike the first conformation, the dihedral angle v 2 of Phe298 is about )30°. In both conformations the uncharged side-chain of Lys296 is hydrogen bonded with the O4 of TPQ. To determine the charged-state of residues involved in substrate binding or in catalytic steps, we computed the pK a of the titratable residues in the presence of the substrate. For the general base candidate Asp300, a pK a value of 8.7 was obtained for the free enzyme, decreasing to 6.6 with CAD or HEX bound at the active site. As noted previously for the free enzyme [32], the large pK a shift of this residue in PSAO is caused by the highly hydrophobic microenvironment at the enzyme active site. The calculated pK a of 6.6 for Asp300 in the active site with substrate bound match the suggestions for BSAO in an early work by Fig. 3. Docking of substrates in the PSAO active site. Carbons of the substrate are shown in yellow and carbons of PSAO are shown in green. Residues that were mobile in docking simulations and residues cited in the text are shown and labelled. Dotted lines: polar contacts. (A–C) Stable conformations of CAD in the active site; (D, E) stable conformations of HEX. See the text for details. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase M. L. Di Paolo et al. 1236 FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS Klinman et al. [14]. Similar results for the pK a value of the catalytic aspartate with the substrate or inhibitor in the active site have also been obtained for ECAO [17,18] and AGAO [19]. In addition, the carboxylic group of Asp300 forms a hydrogen bond with a TPQ carbonyl in the crystal structure of PSAO, suggesting the presence of the protonated form at pH 4.8, the pH of crystallization. The calculated pK a of Lys296 (pK a = 8.3) is reduced by more than two pH units compared with its value in water. The pK a values obtained for Glu359 and Glu412 (7.3 and 5.2, respec- tively), suggest that these residues change their proton- ation states in the pH range explored (i.e. by electrostatic interactions, they may interfere with the binding of charged substrates). Lastly, a pK a of $ 11 was found for Tyr286. It is difficult to assess the error range of pK a values because they have not been experi- mentally determined in the enzyme. Hence, we estimate the error range, based on the uncertainty of the method, as 0.5 pK a units [34,35]. pK a calculations were also performed with HEX bound at the active site and the values obtained were very similar to those with CAD and those reported above. Discussion The above results for PSAO indicate that the binding of CAD, a substrate which bears one positive charge on the head and one on the tail, occurs with maximum efficiency (highest k c ⁄ K m and lowest K m values) at a pH of about 8. According to ionic strength dependence, binding appears to be driven by the electrostatic inter- actions occurring between CAD and polar or nega- tively charged residues located close to the active site. Based on the modelled structure with CAD bound, Glu359 and Glu412 favour stable conformations of the enzyme–substrate complex when negatively charged. The independence of K m of the only head charge-bear- ing HEX on ionic strength indicates the lack of charge– charge interactions of this substrate. These observa- tions, together with the negligible variations of K m on pH, and the positive values of DH and DS, all suggest that binding of the HEX substrate is primarily driven by hydrophobic interactions [36]. The high and positive values of DS of both CAD and HEX (+22 and +24 cal mol )1 ÆK )1 ), calculated from the temperature dependence of the K m , suggest that substrate binding is accompanied by the release of water molecules. Con- cerning the chemical steps, the bell-shaped profile of the k c of CAD and HEX versus pH (Fig. 1B) indicates the involvement of at least two acid–base couples, (B 1 - H + ⁄ B 1 ) and (B 2 -H + ⁄ B 2 ), in the rate-determining step, like the two-protonation state model of Tipton and Dixon [37]. Fig. 1B shows that the pK a values of B 1 and B 2 are substrate dependent; alternatively, and more probably, different residues behave as B 1 and B 2 , depending on the structure of the interacting substrate. According to the above results and the fundamental steps of the reaction described in the literature, shown in Fig. 4A, we propose a kinetic model (for details see Doc. S1), in which the only charged forms of CAD are considered as reactive species, because the charged amine groups favour interactions with the active site. Hence, we included [S] R = [SH + ] + [SH 2 2+ ] for CAD. Conversely, ([S] R = [S] + [SH + ]) was considered for HEX because hydrophobic interactions with the active site prevail. However, we assumed that, in both sub- strates, the attacking amino group was neutral at the beginning of the catalytic cycle so that the nucleophilic attack on TPQ could take place [2]. During the sub- strate entry (not explicitly shown in the simplified scheme of Fig. 4A) the CAD tail is addressed towards stable enzyme–complex conformations by two nega- tively charged residues (Glu359 and Glu412) and by polar residues (Asn386, Ser138 and Tyr168), as shown in Fig. 3. The two charged residues are titrated in the pH range explored and facilitate interaction between enzyme and substrate. The kinetic rate constant, k 1 ,of the recognition step, which leads to the formation of the enzyme–substrate complex (before the chemical events), may be written as: k 1 ¼ ~ k 1  e À d 1 RT K D1 K D1 þ½H þ  ðÞ À d 2 RT K D2 K D2 þ½H þ  ðÞ no ; ð2Þ where the energy of the electrostatic interaction (d 1 and d 2 ) of the substrate with two titratable residues, D1 and D2 (probably Glu359 and Glu412), with ioni- zation constants of K D1 and K D2 , is explicitly reported. The terms K D1 ⁄ (K D1 +[H + ]) and K D2 ⁄ (K D2 +[H + ]) are weighting factors taking into account the molar fraction of D1 and D2 in the deprotonated state. In the case of HEX the ionization contributions to k 1 vanish. ~ k 1 includes all the other energy terms contrib- uting to the kinetic constant (i.e. the contribution of the electrostatic interaction between substrate and polar residues and of the hydrophobic interaction). The fundamental points of our approach describing the catalytic events are as follows. 1. The role played by proton-exchanging residues on the recognition step and on the chemical reaction is explicitly introduced both in K m by Eqn (2), showing residues D1 and D2, and in k c by assuming the pres- ence of B1 and B2 residues. 2. Small differences in substrate structure produce a different enzyme complex, so that the enzyme residues M. L. Di Paolo et al. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS 1237 involved in catalysis, in both recognition and reaction steps, are substrate dependent (see also Fig. 4A show- ing the fundamental steps of the reaction pathway). The position of the TPQ intermediate (the ketimine I ± ) is consequently modified. This hypothesis was confirmed by docking computa- tions, which indicated that deprotonated Lys296 points towards TPQ only in the stable conformations of the HEX–enzyme complex. Conversely, the charge–charge interaction facilitating the binding and positioning of A B Fig. 4. Proposed mechanism of the reduc- tive half-reaction catalyzed by PSAO with CAD and HEX as substrates. (A) Fundamen- tal steps of the reductive half-reaction. B 1 and B 2 , two titratable groups participating in the rate-limiting step; E, enzyme; I ± , Schiff base ketimine form; I þ À , Schiff base aldimine form; P, product; S, substrate (CAD or HEX). (B) Concerted prototropic shift occur- ring during the rate-limiting step. Involve- ment of different proton donors and acceptors if CAD or HEX is the substrate. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase M. L. Di Paolo et al. 1238 FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS CAD also helps to accelerate the chemical events lead- ing to an increase in k c . The importance of this inter- action is also supported by the similar behaviour of CAD and HEX above pH 9.5, when both substrates are present in their neutral form. 3. The heterolytic cleavage of the C a -H bond of the amine is assumed to control the k c of the reductive half-step, as supported in the literature [2,23]. The con- certed prototropic shift converting the Schiff base from the ketimine form (I ± ) to the aldimine form (I þ À )is assisted by two acid–base couples: (B 1 -H + ⁄ B 1 ) and (B 2 -H + ⁄ B 2 ), which interact simultaneously with the Schiff base (see Fig. 4B). From our data it appears that the identity of these residues is substrate depen- dent, which may account for the differences in the pH dependence of the k c values (Fig. 1A). On the basis of the three points described above, and assuming that the deprotonation of the head amino group is not rate-limiting, the following equa- tions were derived for CAD (the detailed kinetic model is reported in Doc. S1): v ¼ k 2 E½ 0 S½ 0 S½ 0 þ k À1 þk 2 k 1  K 2 S þK S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 K S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 no  1 þ a H þ ½ K B1 þ b K B2 H þ ½  1 þ H þ ½ K B1 þ K B2 H þ ½ ð3Þ and for HEX, respectively: v ¼ k 0 2 S½ 0 E½ 0 S½ 0 þ k 0 À1 þk 0 2 k 0 1   1 1 þ H þ ½ K B1 þ K B2 H þ ½ ; ð4Þ where [S ] 0 and [E] 0 are the total concentrations of the substrate and enzyme, respectively. K B1 and K B2 are the ionization constants of the two general bases which control k c , and a and b are empir- ical constants representing the partial activity at extre- mal pH [37]; k 1 is given by Eqn (2). According to Eqns (3,4), the experimental data of Fig. 1 were fitted to the following equations (solid lines of Fig. 1): k cðCADÞ ¼ k 2 1 þ a H þ ½ K B1 þ b K B2 H þ ½  1 þ H þ ½ K B1 þ K B2 H þ ½ ð5Þ logð1=K mðCADÞ Þ¼ Àlog k À1 þ k 2 ~ k 1  e À d 1 RT K D1 ðK D1 þ H þ ½ Þ À d 2 RT K D2 ðK D2 þ H þ ½ Þ no 2 6 4  K 2 S þ K S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 K S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 ()# ð6Þ logðk c =K mðCADÞ Þ¼ Àlog k À1 þ k 2 ~ k 1  þ log e À d 1 RT K D1 ðK D1 þ H þ ½ Þ À d 2 RT K D2 ðK D2 þ H þ ½ Þ no "# À log K 2 S þK S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 K S H þ ½þH þ ½ 2 1 þ H þ ½ K B1 þ K B2 H þ ½ 2 6 4 3 7 5 ð7Þ k cðHEXÞ ¼ k 0 2 1 þ ½H þ  K B1 þ K B2 ½H þ  ð8Þ logðk c =K mðHEXÞ Þ¼log k 0 2 1 þ H þ ½ K B1 þ K B2 H þ ½ 0 @ 1 A : ð9Þ The resulting d 1 , d 2 and pK a values are listed in Table 3. Equation (8) is equivalent to the Tipton and Dixon equation for k c (according to their ‘Simplified reaction scheme’ [38]), where the a and b factors [37] may be included to obtain Eqn (5). The Dixon’s models [39], which are usually utilized to predict pK a values from kinetic data, were used for comparison. In the case of CAD, the fit of K m and k c ⁄ K m were performed with a three pK a model, fitting a bell-shaped curve with an increase with two pK a val- ues and a decrease with one pK a value. log 1=K m ðÞ¼log 1=K m 0 ðÞÀlog H þ ½ 2 =ðK 1 Á K 2 Þ  þ H þ ½=K 2 þ 1 þ K 3 = H þ ½Þ ð10Þ log k c =K m ðÞ¼log k c =K m ðÞ 0 À log H þ ½ 2 =ðK 1 Á K 2 Þ  þ H þ ½=K 2 þ 1 þ K 3 = H þ ½Þ ð11Þ The estimated pK a values according to Eqns (10, 11) are reported in the last column of Table 3. A good match was found between the two sets of data, that is pK a values according to Dixon and to the model we are proposing. However, the models of Dixon do not estimate the contributions to the Gibbs energy of the recognition step due to D 1 and D 2 (d 1 and d 2 ). The equation for (k c ⁄ K m ) HEX (a two-pK a model), according to the approach of Dixon, is formally equiv- alent to Eqn (9). In addition, from Table 3 it appears that the pK a values obtained by the experimental data are in good agreement also with the computed pK a values reported in the Modelling of substrate-PSAO interactions sec- tion. In particular, D 1 could be Glu412 (computed M. L. Di Paolo et al. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS 1239 pK a = 5.2) and D 2 could be identified with Glu359 (computed pK a = 7.2). The pK a values calculated from k c with the CAD substrate are also in accordance with those obtained by Pec et al. [40] for the similar, but more rigid, 1,4- diamino-2-butene substrate (pK a values of 6.9 and 8.1 were obtained from the fit of the k c data). The structure of the catalytic site and the calculated and experimentally obtained pK a values identify Asp300 (pK a = 6.6) and Lys296 (pK a = 8.3) as cata- lytically important residues, with pK a values falling into the pH range delimiting the k c bells. Based on the k c versus pH profiles and on the docking studies, which show a Lys296 orientation that is substrate dependent (Lys296 forms a salt bridge with TPQ and with Glu412 when HEX or CAD, respectively, are in the active site), we proposed the role for Lys296 as a proton donor in the case of CAD and as a proton acceptor in the case of HEX. Asp300 is the proton acceptor candidate in the case of CAD. The position of Tyr286 indicates this residue as a possible candidate for donating a proton (Fig. 4B). Its role in proton transfer has already been suggested by Hevel et al. [13] on HPAO. The results from Pietrangeli et al. [41] with two ali- phatic amines (putrescine and spermidine) and four aro- matic amines have been interpreted in terms of hydrophobic interactions prevailing over polar interac- tions in PSAO. Our results partially match those of these authors, in that the substrate contains a hydro- phobic tail. However the tail amino group of CAD not only affects K m but increases, in orders of magnitude, k c at the optimum pH value. Consequently, the electro- static-driven docking of CAD appears to be crucial for the substrate preference of PSAO. Conversely, if the electrostatic contribution is lacking, increased flexibility of the substrate Schiff base would be expected. A similar effect (although of hydrophobic rather than of electro- static nature) was reported by Taki et al. [42] studying the stereo-selectivity of a bacterial amine oxidase. In conclusion, in a combination of kinetic, structural and computational procedures, this study shows that the substrate-specific interactions underlying the selec- tivity of PSAO not only affect the binding mode of the amine in the active site, but also the identity of the res- idues recruited in the catalytic steps. In particular, the new role of Lys206 is proposed in the catalytic cycle. Because this Lys is a conserved residue in plant CuAOs and has been proposed to play a role in the formation of TPQ sq upon oxidative deamination of its side-chain [43], future study of site-directed mutagene- sis will be necessary to confirm our findings and to have a better understanding of the structural factors controlling substrate preferences and catalysis of CuAOs, enzymes with many still unknown physio- logical functions. Experimental procedures Enzyme purification and activity testing All reagents were from Fluka (Milan, Italy). PSAO was purified from Pisum sativum seedlings according to Vianello et al. [44], reaching a final specific activity of 1.6 lkatÆmg )1 . Initial-rate measurements were carried out by monitoring H 2 O 2 production using a peroxidise–cytochrome c-coupled assay [45]. Kinetic runs were performed at 27 °C, in various experimental conditions, particularly at variable amine sub- strate concentrations, pH values (range 5.20–10.20) and ionic strength (20–220 mm), equilibrated with air. Steady- state kinetic parameters (k c and K m ) were calculated from Table 3. Ionization constants and energy contributions from the pH profile of PSAO kinetic parameters. Column 3: pK a values and free-energy contributions (d 1 and d 2 ) were obtained by fitting exper- imental data of k c and K m or pseudo-first-order k c ⁄ K m constants as a function of pH according to the equations described in the Dis- cussion. HEX: k c (Eqn 8) and k c ⁄ K m (Eqn 9) fitting were obtained leaving all unknown parameters (i.e. K B1 and K B2 ) floating. CAD: k c (Eqn 5) fitting was obtained leaving all unknown parameters float- ing; in the fitting of K m (Eqn 6) and k c ⁄ K m (Eqn 7), K D1 ,K D2 , d 1 and d 2 terms were left to float but pK B1 = 6.66 and pK B2 = 8.30 were maintained fixed, as calculated from the k c data; pK s = 10 was also maintained fixed. Column 4: pK a values from the dependence on pH of K m (Eqn 10) and k c ⁄ K m (Eqn 11) using CAD as a substrate, according to Dixon’s model [39]. Substrate Kinetic parameter pK a according to the proposed model pKa according to Dixon’s model CAD k c pK B1 = 6.66 ± 0.15 pK B2 = 8.30 ± 0.11 CAD K m pK D1 = 5.37 ± 0.32 pK D1 = 5.59± 0.31 pK D2 = 6.90 ± 0.29 pK D2 = 7.23 ± 0.28 d 1 = )3.97 ± 0.79 kcalÆmol )1 d 2 = )1.21 ± 0.46 kcalÆmol )1 pK S = 9.95 ± 0.12 pK S = 10.04 ± 0.13 k c ⁄ K m pK D1 = 5.22 ± 0.62 pK D2 = 6.16 ± 0.61 pK D2 = 7.28 ± 0.26 pK D2 = 7.14 ± 0.28 d 1 = )2.5 ± 1.50 kcalÆmol )1 d 2 = )1.20 ± 0.28 kcalÆmol )1 pK S = 10.0 (fixed) pK S = 8.95 ± 0.34 HEX k c pK B1 = 8.41 ± 0.17 pK B2 = 10.36 ± 0.23 k c ⁄ K m pK B1 = 8.30 ± 0.18 pK B2 = 10.00 ± 0.35 Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase M. L. Di Paolo et al. 1240 FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS nonlinear fitting of the reaction rate plots to the Michaelis– Menten equation using sigmaplot 2004, Version 9.01 (Sy- stat Software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA). Michaelis–Men- ten behaviour was observed independently of substrate, pH and ionic strength. Experiments were performed in solutions containing 25 mm buffer and 125 mm NaCl at various pH values. The buffers used were: sodium acetate (pH 5.2–5.6), Mes (pH 5.6–6.4), Mops (pH 6.61–7.03), Hepes (pH 8.00–8.65), sodium borate (pH 8.71–9.71) and sodium carbonate (pH 9.71–10.20). Kinetic measurements performed in these buf- fers at overlapping pH values gave identical results within the experimental error, excluding specific salt effects. Experiments were performed at pH 7.20, in solution con- taining 25 mm Hepes at various ionic strengths (10–200 mm NaCl was added). The heat of activation (DH*) and entropy (DS*) were obtained by measuring the effect of temperature on k c , according to the law: ln k c ¼ ln j k B T h þ DSà R À DHà RT ; where DH* is the heat of activation, DS* is the entropy of activation, k B is the Boltzmann constant, h is the Plank constant, R is the gas constant and j is the transmission coefficient. As j is usually close to unity [46] this equation simplifies into: ln k c ¼ ln k B T h þ DSà R À DHà RT : ð12Þ The changes in enthalpy (DH) and entropy (DS) of the binding process were obtained by measuring the effect of temperature on K m , according to the equation: ln 1 K m ¼ DS R À DH RT ; ð13Þ assuming that 1 ⁄ K m values are the association constants of the enzyme–substrate complex and D H and DS are the ther- modynamic parameters of enzyme–substrate complex for- mation. The constants k c and K m at various temperatures were calculated from Michaelis–Menten plots obtained in the range 290–320 K. Computational details We studied the binding modes of CAD and HEX by means of docking simulation in the PSAO active site. The crystal structure of free PSAO with the Protein Data Bank code 1KSI [4] was used as a starting model for all calculations. In this structure the TPQ ring adopts a nonproductive con- formation (i.e. O2 of TPQ points towards Asp300 and O5 points towards the copper ion cofactor) [22]. Hence, to gen- erate an appropriate model for the reaction, the TPQ ring was rotated by 180°. As the two subunits in PSAO operate simultaneously, but not cooperatively [47], substrate docking was simulated only in subunit A. AutoDockTools version 1.5.2 (the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to add polar hydrogens to the PSAO crystal structure and to assign Gasteiger charges to the atoms, with the exception of TPQ, the charges of which were calculated using the petra web server [ http://www2.chemie.uni-erlangen.de/ software/petra]. autodock 4 software was used to perform docking simulations, employing the Lamarckian genetic algorithm [48]. Default settings were used for docking parameters. Other details are available in Doc. S2. As previously described [33], the active site of PSAO is extremely hydrophobic, and therefore in order to account properly for the pK a shift of titratable residues at the cata- lytic centre, a microenvironment-dependent method had to be applied. Hence, the pK a values of titratable active-site residues in the presence of various substrates were calcu- lated using the screened Coulomb potential method, with microenvironment-dependent dielectric screening functions [34,35]. (Other details can be found in Doc. S2.) Acknowledgements This work was partly funded by Istituto Nazionale Bio- strutture Biosistemi (Rome, Italy) and by Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA) K72579, M.F for Bolyai Ja ´ nos fellowship. References 1 Janes S M, Mu D, Wemmer D, Smith AJ, Kaur S, Maltby D, Burlingame AL & Klinman JP (1990) A new redox cofactor in eukaryotic enzymes: 6-hydroxydopa at the active site of bovine serum amine oxidase. Science 248, 981–987. 2 Mure M, Mills SA & Klinman JP (2002) Catalytic mechanism of the topa quinone containing copper amine oxidases. Biochemistry 41, 9269–9278. 3 Parsons MR, Convery MA, Wilmot CM, Yadav RDS, Blakeley V, Corner AS, Phillips SEV, McPherson MJ & Knowles PF (1995) Crystal structure of a quinoenzyme: copper amine oxidase of Escherichia coli at 2 A ˚ resolu- tion. Structure 3, 1171–1184. 4 Kumar V, Dooley DM, Freeman HC, Guss JM, Harvey I, McGuirl MA, Wilce MCJ & Zubak VM (1996) Crystal structure of an eukaryotic (pea seedling) copper-containing amine oxidase at 2.2 A ˚ resolution. Structure 4, 943–955. 5 Wilce MCJ, Dooley DM, Freeman HC, Guss JM, Matsunami H, McIntire WS, Ruggiero CE, Tanizawa K & Yamaguchi J (1997) Crystal structures of the copper-containing amine oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis in the holo and apo forms: implications for M. L. Di Paolo et al. Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase FEBS Journal 278 (2011) 1232–1243 ª 2011 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2011 FEBS 1241 [...]... exchange in the bovine plasma amine oxidase reaction: a role for single-base catalysis in amine oxidation and imine exchange Biochemistry 25, 1898–1904 Bellelli A, Morpurgo L, Mondovı` B & Agostinelli E (2000) The oxidation and reduction reactions of bovine serum amine oxidase – a kinetic study Eur J Biochem 267, 3264–3269 Dawkess H & Phillips S (2001) Copper amine oxidase: cunning cofactor and controversial... K, Yamamoto Y & Okajima T (2008) Substrate oxidation by amine oxidase 43 44 45 46 47 48 Further insight into the mechanism of stereo-selective proton abstraction by bacterial copper amine oxidase Biochemistry 47, 7726–7733 Mura A, Anedda R, Pintus F, Casu M, Padiglia A, Floris G & Medda R (2007) An important lysine residue in copper ⁄ quinine-containig amine oxidases Febs J 274, 2585–2595 Vianello F,... Lentil seedling amine oxidase: interaction with carbonyl reagents Biochem Int 28, 1097–1107 Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK & Olson AJ (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function J Comput Chem 19, 1639 Supporting information The following supplementary material is available: Doc S1 Kinetic model formulation Doc. .. as indicators of TPQ cofactor orientation in amine oxidases Biochemistry 41, 687–696 Prabhakar R & Siegbahn PEM (2001) A Theoretical study of the mechanism for the reductive half-reaction of pea seedling amine oxidase (PSAO) J Phys Chem B 105, 4400–4408 Chang CM, Klema VJ, Johnson BJ, Mure M, Klinman JP & Wilmott CM (2010) Kinetic and structural analysis of substrate specificity in two copper amine oxidases... found in the online version of this article Please note: As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files)should be addressed to the authors FEBS... the catalytic role of the aspartic acid residue conserved in copper amine oxidase Biochemistry 45, 4105–4120 Plastino J, Green EL, Sanders-Loehr J & Klinman JP (1999) An unexpected role for the active site base in cofactor orientation and flexibility in the copper amine oxidase from Hansenula polymorpha Biochemistry 38, 8204–8216 Green EL, Nakamura N, Dooley DM, Klinman JP & Sanders-Loehr J (2002) Rates... JP (2008) Innerspere mechanism for molecular oxygen reduction catalyzed by copper amine oxidases J Am Chem Soc 130, 9459–9473 Turowski P, McGuirl M & Dooley D (1993) Intramolecular electron transfer rate between active site copper and topaquinone in pea seedling amine oxidase J Biol Chem 268, 17680–17682 Takahashi K & Klinman JP (2006) Relationship of stopped flow to steady state parameters in the dimeric... (1953) The effect of pH on the affinity of enzymes for substrates and inhibitors Biochem J 55, 61–170 40 Pec P, Haviger A & Frebort I (1992) Determination of the dissociation constants of pea diamine oxidase Biochem Int 26, 87–96 41 Pietrangeli P, Federico R, Mondovı` B & Morpurgo L (2007) Substrate specificity of copper-containing amine oxidases J Inorg Biochem 101, 997–1004 42 Taki M, Murakawa T, Nakamoto... polymorpha Biochemistry 49, 2540– 2550 Di Paolo ML, Stevanato R, Corazza A, Vianello F, Lunelli L, Scarpa M & Rigo A (2003) Electrostatic compared with hydrophobic interactions between bovine serum amine oxidase and its substrates Biochem J 371, 549–556 ` Bellelli A, Finazzi Agro A, Floris G & Brunori M (1991) On the mechanism and rate of substrate oxidation by amine oxidase from lentil seedlings J... 1608–1620 De Vries S, Van Spanning R & Steinebach V (2000) A spectroscopic and kinetic study of Escherichia Coli amine oxidase J Mol Catal B Enzym 8, 111–120 Hevel JM, Mills SA & Klinman JP (1999) Mutation of a strictly conserved, active- active site residue alters substrate specificity and cofactor biogenesis in a copper amine oxidase Biochemistry 38, 3683–3693 Farnum M, Palcic M & Klinman JP (1986) pH dependence . Active site residue involvement in monoamine or diamine oxidation catalysed by pea seedling amine oxidase Maria Luisa Di Paolo 1 ,. globiformis amine oxidase; BSAO, bovine serum amine oxidase; CAD, cadaverine; CuAO, copper amine oxidase; ECAO, Escherichia coli amine oxidase; HEX, hexylamine;