Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 11 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
11
Dung lượng
535,03 KB
Nội dung
Manipulationofprenylchainlength determination
mechanism of cis-prenyltransferases
Yugesh Kharel*, Seiji Takahashi*, Satoshi Yamashita and Tanetoshi Koyama
Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
In the biosynthesis of isoprenoids, which are the most
structurally diverse and abundant among natural prod-
ucts, all carbon skeletons are biosynthesized using
sequential condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate
(IPP, C
5
) and allylic diphosphates by actions of prenyl
chain elongating enzymes, commonly called prenyl-
transferases. Prenyltransferases can be classified into
two major groups, i.e. trans- and cis-prenyltransferases,
according to the geometry of the prenylchain units in
the products [1,2]. The reactions catalysed by prenyl-
transferases start by the formation of allylic cation
after the elimination of pyrophosphate ion to form an
allylic prenyl diphosphate, followed by addition of an
IPP with stereospecific removal of a proton at the
2-position. The only difference between the reaction
catalyzed by trans- and cis-prenyltransferase is the
prochirality of the proton, i.e. pro-R for trans-
prenyltransferase and pro-S for cis-prenyltransferase
(Fig. 1a). However, recent molecular analysis and crys-
tal structure determinationof Micrococcus luteus B-P
26 undecaprenyl diphosphate (UPP, C
55
) synthase,
which catalyses cis-condensation to synthesize UPP,
Keywords
chain-length determination mechanism; cis-
prenyltransferase; isoprenoid biosynthesis;
Micrococcus luteus B-P 26; undecaprenyl
diphosphate synthase
Correspondence
T. Koyama, Institute of Multidisciplinary
Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku
University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai,
980-8577, Japan
Fax: +81 22 217 5620
Tel:: +81 22 217 5621
E.mail: koyama@tagen.tohoku.ac.jp
Note
*Both authors contributed equally to this
work.
(Received 28 October 2005, revised 9
December 2005, accepted 12 December
2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05097.x
The carbon backbones of Z,E-mixed isoprenoids are synthesized by
sequential cis-condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and an allylic
diphosphate through actions of a series of enzymes called cis-prenyltrans-
ferases. Recent molecular analyses of Micrococcus luteus B-P 26 undecapre-
nyl diphosphate (UPP, C
55
) synthase [Fujihashi M, Zhang Y-W, Higuchi
Y, Li X-Y, Koyama T & Miki K (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98,
4337–4342.] showed that not only the primary structure but also the crystal
structure ofcis-prenyltransferases were totally different from those of
trans-prenyltransferases. Although many studies on structure–function rela-
tionships ofcis-prenyltransferases have been reported, regulation mecha-
nisms for the ultimate prenylchainlength have not yet been elucidated.
We report here that the ultimate chainlengthofprenyl products can be
controlled through structural manipulationof UPP synthase of M. luteus
B-P 26, based on comparisons between structures of various cis-prenyl-
transferases. Replacements of Ala72, Phe73, and Trp78, which are located
in the proximity of the substrate binding site, with Leu ) as in Z,E-farnesyl
diphosphate (C
15
) synthase ) resulted in shorter ultimate products with
C
20)35
. Additional mutation of F223H resulted in even shorter products.
On the other hand, insertion of charged residues originating from long-
chain cis-prenyltransferases into helix-3, which participates in constitution
of the large hydrophobic cleft, resulted in lengthening of the ultimate prod-
uct chain length, leading to C
60)75
. These results helped us understand
reaction mechanisms of cis-prenyltransferase including regulation of the
ultimate prenyl chain-length.
Abbreviations
DedolPP, dehydrodolichyl diphosphate; E,E-FPP, E,E-farnesyl diphosphate; FARM, first aspartate-rich motif; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; IPP,
isopentenyl diphosphate; UPP, undecaprenyl diphosphate; Z,E-FPP, Z,E-farnesyl diphosphate; Z,E-DecPP, Z,E-mixed decaprenyl diphosphate.
FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 647
showed that not only the primary but also the three-
dimensional structure of cis-prenyltransferase were
totally different from those of trans-prenyltransferases
[3-5]. Homologous genes for cis-prenyltransferases
have been identified in various organisms [6–13],
revealing five highly conserved regions in the primary
structure of all cis-prenyltransferases [3]. On the other
hand, cis-prenyltransferases are classified into three
subfamilies with respect to product chain length, i.e.
short-chain (C
15
), medium-chain (C
50)55
), and long-
chain (C
70)120
) cis-prenyltransferases (Fig. 1b). Z,E-
farnesyl diphosphate (Z,E-FPP, C
15
) synthase from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Rv1086, is the only
enzyme identified as a short-chain cis-prenyltrans-
ferase, which catalyses cis-condensation of one IPP
with geranyl diphosphate (GPP, C
10
) [11]. Medium-
chain cis-prenyltransferases are represented by UPP
synthase which catalyses cis-condensation of eight IPPs
with E,E-FPP (C
15
). This enzyme is responsible for
biogenesis of undecaprenyl phosphate, an indispens-
able glycosyl carrier lipid in bacterial cell wall biosyn-
thesis. Z,E-mixed decaprenyl diphosphate (Z,E-DecPP,
C
50
) synthase from M. tuberculosis, Rv2361, is also
categorized in this subfamily [11]. Most of dehydro-
dolichyl diphosphate (DedolPP) synthases in eukaryo-
tes catalysing synthesis of precursors of sugar carrier
lipid dolichol during biosynthesis of glycoproteins,
are categorized as long-chain cis-prenyltransferases.
Srt1p and Rer2p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae [7,8]
and HDS from human [12] are included in this sub-
family.
One of the most interesting research topics on cata-
lytic mechanisms ofprenylchain elongating enzymes
is to understand mechanisms by which individual pre-
nyltransferases recognize prenylchain lengths of allylic
substrates and products. Using a series of effective ran-
dom chemical mutagenesis, Ohnuma et al. showed that
the ultimate product chainlengthof trans-prenyltrans-
ferases was regulated by bulky residues located
upstream of the first Asp-rich motif (FARM), which is
one of the most highly conserved regions among trans-
prenyltransferases [2,14,15]. The bulky residues func-
tion as a floor of the catalytic pocket for the growing
isoprenoid chain to block further elongation. Based on
crystal structure and mutagenetic studies of the avian
FPP synthase, Tarshis et al. concluded that allylic
A
B
Fig. 1. Classification of prenyltransferases. (A) Schematic drawing of the reactions catalysed by trans-prenyltransferase and cis-prenyltrans-
ferase. (B) Classification ofcis-prenyltransferases with respect to product chain lengths. These enzymes catalyse cis-condensation of IPP
(isoprene unit, C
5
) onto an allylic diphosphate, all-E-prenyl diphosphate. Grey lines indicate numbers of isoprene units of representative allylic
substrates for each cis-prenyltransferase. Red arrows indicate numbers of isoprene units of representative ultimate products, which are
condensed with cis-configuration by each enzyme.
Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases Y. Kharel et al.
648 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS
diphosphate bound through Mg
2+
to Asp residues in
the FARM motif [16]. In contrast, mechanisms for
determination of the ultimate product chainlength of
cis-prenyltransferases have not yet been determined
although mutational analysis of highly conserved resi-
dues and determinationof crystal structures of UPP
synthase have enabled us to understand basic catalytic
mechanisms ofcis-prenyltransferases [5,17–24].
In order to investigate regions important for
determination of product chainlength in cis-prenyl-
transferases, we searched characteristic residues of
short- or long-chain cis-prenyltransferase subfamilies,
based on comparisons between primary structures of
cis-prenyltransferases identified, and crystal structures
of UPP synthases [5]. Introduction of mutations in
regions of M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase, which
correspond to characteristic residues, resulted in dras-
tic alteration of the ultimate product chainlength of
prenyl products. Amino acid residues located in close
proximity to the substrate binding site play an essen-
tial role in the synthesis of short-chain products such
as Z,E-FPP, while some charged residues on the
side-wall of the large hydrophobic cleft are important
to determine the ultimate chainlengthof polyprenyl
products. These findings enabled us to understand
reaction mechanisms of cis-prenyltransferases, and
manipulate enzymes to produce various lengths of
Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids.
Results
In order to identify characteristic residues of short- or
long-chain cis-prenyltransferase subfamilies, primary
structures of proteins that were identified as cis-prenyl-
transferases were compared. Because Rv1086 from
M. tuberculosis is the only enzyme cloned and
identified as a short-chain cis-prenyltransferase, Z,E-
FPP synthase [11], we attempted to identify Rv1086-
specific residues that will help name the important
amino acid residues for ultimate chain-length determin-
ation. As shown in Fig. 2A, only Rv1086 possesses
three Leu residues at positions 84, 85, and 90 instead
of the corresponding Ala, Phe, and Leu ⁄ Trp in the
conserved region III of other cis-prenyltransferases.
Fig. 2. Amino acid residues characteristic for short-chain cis-prenyl-
transferases functioning in the termination mechanismof cis-prenyl
chain elongation to produce short-chain Z,E-mixed prenyl diphos-
phates. (A) Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences of
seven cis-prenyltransferases: Rv1086, Z,E-FPP synthase from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Accession No.; D70895); Rv2361c,
DecPP synthase from M. tuberculosis (H70585); M. luteus, UPP
synthase from M. luteus B-P 26 (BAA31993); E. coli, UPP synthase
from E. coli (Q47675); Rer2p, DedolPP synthase from Saccharo-
myces cerevisiae (BAA36577); Srt1p, polyprenyl PP synthase from
S. cerevisiae (NP_013819); HDS, DedolPP synthases from human
(BAC57588). Here, parts of sequences in conserved regions III and V
are shown. Multiple alignment was obtained using the
CLUSTAL W
program, and was edited using SeqVu. Residues with more than
70% identity are boxed, and all residues are coloured as follows: non-
polar (G, A, V, L, I, P, F, M, W, C), yellow; uncharged polar (N, Q, S,
T, Y), green; acidic (D, E), red; basic (K, R, H), blue. Red triangles
indicate residues that are characteristic for short-chain cis-prenyl-
transferase. (B) TLC autoradiograms of polyprenyl alcohols derived
from products of cis-prenyl chain elongation with wild-type and
mutant UPP synthases, LL, LLL, F223H, and LLLH, using E,E-FPP
(left panel) of GPP (right panel) as allylic substrates. Spots of
authentic standard prenyl alcohols are as follows: C
15
, E,E-farnesol;
C
20
, all-E-geranylgeraniol; C
55
, undecaprenol. Ori; origin, S.F.; solvent
front.
Y. Kharel et al. Product chainlengthof cis-prenyltransferases
FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 649
Furthermore, His-237 of Rv1086 downstream of the
conserved region V was found at the corresponding
position for Leu ⁄ Phe residue in other cis-prenyltrans-
ferases.
To investigate whether these Rv1086-characteristic
residues function in the reaction mechanism, we
replaced the corresponding residues of M. luteus B-P
26 UPP synthase with these Rv1086-specific residues
to construct mutant enzymes with single-, double-,
triple-, and quadruple mutations, i.e. F223H, A72L ⁄
F73L (LL), A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L (LLL), and A72L ⁄
F73L ⁄ W78L ⁄ F223H (LLLH), respectively. These
mutants were expressed in Escherichia coli, and puri-
fied to analyse prenyltransferase activity in vitro.
Product distribution patterns of the mutants were com-
pared with those of the wild-type UPP synthase, which
produces C
55
and C
60
prenyl products in vitro. The
TLC autoradiogram clearly showed that LL produced
shorter polyisoprenoids (C
25)40
as major products),
and LLL produced even shorter polyisoprenoids
(C
20)35
as major products) than wild-type UPP syn-
thase when E,E-FPP and GPP were used as allylic sub-
strates (Fig. 2B).
In our previous study, site-directed mutagenesis at
the highly conserved Phe73 in region III of M. luteus
B-P 26 UPP synthase resulted in a 32-fold increased
K
m
value for IPP, and a 16-fold decreased k
cat
value
[20]. These results indicated that Phe73 in region III
was important for binding of IPP in the proper direc-
tion. We also observed the shortening of the ultimate
chain lengthofprenyl products in mutants of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase, i.e. F73A and S74A
[20]. To analyse functions of Ala72 and Trp78, which
are located in the vicinity of Phe73 in region III, kin-
etic constants of the mutants were determined. A72L ⁄
F73L showed an 88-fold higher K
m
value for IPP
compared with the wild-type enzyme. However,
A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L showed only a six-fold increased
K
m
value for IPP (Table 1), indicating that shortening
of the ultimate chainlengthof products by the triple
mutation, A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L was not simply caused
by a decrease in the affinity of the catalytic domain for
IPP. In addition, effects of mutations at Ala72, Phe73,
and Trp78 on K
m
values for E,E-FPP were not signifi-
cant (within threefold).
On the other hand, replacement of Phe223 with
His in mutants F223H or LLLH, dramatically
decreased catalytic activity when E,E-FPP was used
as allylic substrate (Fig. 2B, left panel). However,
when GPP was used, mutants showed certain cata-
lytic activity producing C
45-55
and C
15
(Fig. 2B, right
panel). These results suggested that His237 of
Rv1086, corresponding to Phe223 of M. luteus B-P
26 UPP synthase, might function to prefer GPP as
an allylic substrate.
We next investigated the characteristic residues of
long-chain cis-prenyltransferase subfamilies to identify
the important region for producing polyisoprenoid
chains longer than C
55
. Multiple alignment of cis-pre-
nyltransferases revealed that long-chain cis-prenyl-
transferases such as Srt1p and Rer2p from
S. cerevisiae [7,8] and HDS from human [12], have
three to seven extra amino acid residues downstream
of the conserved region III (Fig. 3A). This position
corresponds to helix-3 of the M. luteus B-P 26 UPP
synthase, which participates in the constitution of the
hydrophobic cleft. The hydrophobic cleft is composed
of helix-2, helix-3, sheet-2, and sheet-4, and is consid-
ered to accommodate the elongated prenyl intermedi-
ates [5]. In order to indicate the significance of these
residues, we constructed two mutants of M. luteus
B-P 26 UPP synthase, i.e. EKE and RAKDY, which
contained insertions corresponding exactly to the
extra amino acid residues of DedolPP synthases from
human (HDS, positions 107–109) and yeast (Srt1p,
positions 148–152), respectively (Fig. 3A). Products
from prenyltransferase reaction with these UPP syn-
thase mutants in vitro were analysed by reversed-
phase TLC. As shown in Fig. 3B, EKE produced
relatively longer prenyl products with carbon chain
lengths of C
55)70
. Furthermore, RAKDY gave even
longer prenyl products with chain lengths of C
60)75
.
In contrast, the control mutant with an insertion of
five Ala residues instead of extra residues did not
show such effects (Fig. 3B). Introduction of extra
amino acid residues caused a several times increase of
K
m
values for IPP (Table 1). In contrast, mutants
EKE and RAKDY showed a 1.4–2.8-fold lower K
m
values for FPP, suggesting that the change in struc-
ture of helix-3 moderately affected binding affinity
for FPP.
To confirm the significance of the extra resi-
dues found in long-chain cis-prenyltransferases, we
Table 1. Kinetic constants for wild-type and mutant UPP synthases
of M. luteus B-P 26.
Enzymes K
m
(IPP) (lM)
a
K
m
(FPP) (lM)
Wild-type 7.8 ± 2.8 8.3 ± 1.3
F73A
b
252 ± 62 9.3 ± 3.3
A72L ⁄ F73L (LL) 690 ± 242 26 ± 6
A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L (LLL) 49 ± 25 14 ± 2
EKE 39 ± 10 6 ± 2
RAKDY 16 ± 4 3 ± 0.3
a
For reactions with FPP.
b
Previous data from [3].
Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases Y. Kharel et al.
650 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS
constructed a deletion mutant of Srt1p lacking the
five extra residues, Srt1p-delta (Fig. 3A). Because
Srt1p expressed in E. coli does not show significant
prenyltransferase activity, wild-type Srt1p and Srt1p-
delta were expressed in the yeast mutant strain
SNH23-7D which is deficient in the DedolPP synthase
gene, RER2, to analyse the reaction products clearly.
Product analysis of the prenyltransferase reaction
with yeast crude proteins indicated that the mutant
Srt1p-delta produced shorter prenyl products with a
chain lengthof C
65)95
as major products (Fig. 3C),
while wild-type Srt1p produced C
75)110
prenyl prod-
ucts as reported previously [8]. Taken together, the
region in helix-3 is also very important for the ulti-
mate chainlengthdeterminationmechanism for cis-
prenyltransferases.
Discussion
In nature, a variety of Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids with
different carbon chain lengths from Z,E-FPP (C
15
)to
natural rubber (C
>10,000
) are produced, and distribu-
tion of carbon chain lengths of Z,E-mixed polyisopre-
noids seems to depend on the origin of organisms.
Most bacteria produce only UPP (C
55
), while eukaryo-
tes such as yeasts and mammals produce longer
Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids including DedolPP (C
70)100
).
In higher plants, various Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids
including dolichol and polyprenol are biosynthesized
with two different distribution patterns of carbon
chain length, encompassing C
50)60
and C
70)120
. More-
over, rubber producing plants such as Hevea brasilien-
sis produce high molecular weight cis-1,4-polyisoprene,
Fig. 3. Extra amino acid residues character-
istic for long-chain cis-prenyltransferases are
important in producing long-chain Z,E-mixed
prenyl diphosphates. (A) Multiple alignment
of amino acid sequences of seven cis-pre-
nyltransferases. In this figure, a part of the
sequence of helix-3 is shown. Similar nota-
tions as in Fig. 2 are used for sequences
and colour usage. The red upper line indi-
cates the extra residues that are characteris-
tic for long-chain cis-prenyltransferase.
Some parts of sequences of the mutants of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase (EKE,
RAKDY) and of Srt1p (Srt1p-delta) are
shown. (B) TLC autoradiograms of polypre-
nyl alcohols corresponding to products of
cis-prenyl chain elongation with wild-type
and mutant UPP synthases, EKE, RAKDY,
and AAAAA, using E,E-FPP as allylic sub-
strate. C
55
indicates the spot of authentic
undecaprenol. Ori, origin; S.F., solvent front.
(C) TLC autoradiograms of polyprenyl
alcohols corresponding to the products of
cis-prenyl chain elongation with wild-type
and mutants Srt1p, Srt1p-delta, using
E,E-FPP as substrate. Spots of authentic
standard prenyl alcohols are as follows:
C
15
, E,E-farnesol; C
55
, undecaprenol; C
75
,
C
75
-polyprenol; C
100
,C
100
-polyprenol. Ori,
origin; S.F., solvent front.
Y. Kharel et al. Product chainlengthof cis-prenyltransferases
FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 651
i.e. natural rubber. Several lines of evidence suggest
that product chain lengths ofcis-prenyltransferases can
be altered by environmental factors. Yamada et al.
[25,26] reported differences in chain lengths of dolichol
among tissues in the rat such as liver (C
90)95
) and tes-
tis (C
85)90
). Matsuoka et al. [27] reported that chain
length distribution of products from DedolPP synthase
in microsomal fractions of rat liver could be affected
by reaction conditions in vitro such as detergents and
phospholipids. However, recent reports on cloning and
characterization ofcis-prenyltransferases from various
organisms showed that specificities of product chain
lengths mainly depended on different enzymatic prop-
erties attributable to structural diversity of each
enzyme. Based on these facts, we investigated charac-
teristic residues of short- or long-chain cis-prenyl-
transferase subfamilies to elucidate chain length
determination mechanisms.
Leu residues at positions 84, 85, and 90 in the
Z,E-FPP synthase Rv1086 were found to play a very
important role in shortening the ultimate chain length
of prenyl products (Fig. 2). The corresponding residues
in M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase, i.e. Ala72, Phe73,
and Trp78, are located in the highly conserved region
III, and were suggested to be located close to the bind-
ing site for IPP, which had been identified by a series
of site-directed mutagenesis studies [20]. In the crystal
structure of UPP synthase from M. luteus B-P 26,
these residues are located at the edge of the large
hydrophobic cleft. Recently, crystal structure of E. coli
UPP synthase bound with the allylic substrate
E,E-FPP [28] has been revealed. In this structure,
Ala69, which corresponds to Ala72 of M. luteus B-P
26 UPP synthase, is located close to the x-end carbon,
C-14 of E,E-FPP at a distance of 3.2 A
˚
. More recently,
crystal structure of the D26A mutant E. coli UPP syn-
thase, which shows about an 800-fold lower k
cat
value
than the wild-type enzyme, bound with IPP, has also
been described [29]. In order to understand the
molecular mechanisms ofchainlength determination,
we built structural models of Rv1086 and of LLLH
mutant of M. luteus UPP synthase using the E. coli
UPP synthase-E,E-FPP complex structure as template,
based on multiple sequence alignments of cis-prenyl-
transferases previously identified. Then, structures of
E,E-FPP and IPP were superimposed on the structural
models (Fig. 4). In these proposed models, Leu residue
which corresponds to Ala69 of E. coli UPP synthase is
closer to the C-14 of E,E-FPP, suggesting that the
bulky alkyl group of Leu72 in LLLH may interfere
with cis-addition of IPP onto E,E-FPP or Z,E-FPP.
In contrast, Phe73 and Trp78 of M. luteus B-P 26
UPP synthase, corresponding to Leu85 and Leu90 of
Rv1086, respectively, are not close to the binding site
for E,E-FPP [5,28]. In the crystal structure of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase without substrates, res-
idues from Ser74 to Val85 downstream of sheet-2 in
the conserved region III could not be defined because
of high flexibility [5]. In addition, substitution of the
highly conserved Phe73 and Ser74 in region III of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase into Ala resulted in
32- and 16-fold increases in K
m
value for IPP, and
16- and 12-fold decreases in k
cat
value, respectively
[20]. These results indicated that the flexible domain in
the conserved region III was important for binding of
IPP in the proper direction, and for catalytic function.
The double mutant A72L ⁄ F73L prepared in the pre-
sent study also showed an 88-fold higher K
m
value for
IPP compared with the wild-type enzyme. However,
the triple mutant A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L showed a sixfold
Fig. 4. Overall catalytic centre of a structural model for the LLLH
mutant. The model was built based on the crystal structure of E,E-
FPP complex of UPP synthase from E. coli (Protein Data Bank No.
1V7U). Then, structures of E,E-FPP and IPP, which were identified
from the complex structure of IPP and the D26A mutant of E. coli
UPP synthase (Protein Data Bank No. 1X09), were superimposed
on the structural models. Amino acid residues mutated in the LLLH
mutant are indicated in red, and are overlapped with residues in
the wild-type UPP synthase of M. luteus B-P 26. The structural
P-loop motif, proposed to function in binding of allylic substrates
such as E,E-FPP, and charged residues including Arg197 and
Arg203 are indicated.
Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases Y. Kharel et al.
652 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS
increased K
m
value for IPP (Table 1). These results
suggested that replacement of Trp78 for Leu was
necessary for constitution of a proper IPP binding
domain when Ala72 and Phe73 were replaced
with Leu residues which corresponded to Leu84, -85,
and -90, respectively, in Rv1086.
Substitution of Phe223 with His dramatically
decreased the catalytic activity of UPP synthase when
E,E-FPP was used as allylic substrate. However, GPP
could be accepted by these mutants as allylic substrate
to produce shorter prenyl products, i.e. C
45)55
and C
15
(Fig. 2B). In structural models of Rv1086 and the
LLLH mutant of M. luteus UPP synthase (Fig. 4),
His237 of Rv1086 is located in proximity of the struc-
tural P-loop motif, which is thought to recognize the
diphosphate group of allylic substrates such as
E,E-FPP [5,23]. Substitution of His for Phe223 may
affect binding affinity for the allylic substrate with the
structural P-loop motif. This hypothesis agrees with
the fact that in the prenyltransferase reaction by
Rv1086 in vitro, GPP and neryl diphosphate (C
10
) were
the only functional allylic substrates among the five
allylic substrates tested, including dimethylallyl diphos-
phate (C
5
) E,E-FPP and E,E,E-geranylgeranyl diphos-
phate (C
20
) [30].
On the other hand, three to seven extra amino acid
residues found downstream of the conserved region III
were shown to be important for the production of long
chain Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids by the long-chain cis-
prenyltransferase subfamily. According to the crystal
structure of UPP synthase of M. luteus B-P 26, these
extra residues are located on the side wall of the large
hydrophobic cleft [5]. Ko et al. reported that replace-
ment of Leu137 of E. coli UPP synthase, which is
located at the ‘bottom’ of the hydrophobic cleft, with
Ala resulted in elongation of the ultimate chain length
of Z,E-mixed polyisoprenoids, producing C
55
and C
60
as major products in the presence of 0.1% Triton
X-100 [21]. Moreover, they indicated that the mutant
L137A produced C
70
and C
75
as major products in a
reaction without Triton X-100 for 96 h [21]. Based on
these results, they proposed that Leu137 functioned as
the floor of the tunnel to block further elongation of
polyprenyl products. This proposed model seems to be
analogous to the chain-length determination mechan-
ism of trans-prenyltransferases, in which bulky residues
located upstream of FARM play an important role in
determination of the ultimate prenylchain length,
composing a suitable size for the pocket for growing
of the isoprenoid chain [2,15,16]. According to this
model, we constructed and analysed a mutant of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase L140A, which corres-
ponded to the E. coli UPP synthase mutant L137A,
and found that the mutant also produced C
55
and C
60
as major products in the presence of Triton X-100
(data not shown). However, our results obtained in the
present study couldn’t be explained by the model pro-
posed by Ko et al. because Leu137 of E. coli UPP
synthase did not correspond to the domain where we
introduced the extra amino acid residues, and the
mutants EKE and RAKDY produced even longer
polyprenyl products (C
60)75
) than the E. coli UPP syn-
thase mutant L137A in the presence of Triton X-100.
Insertion of five Ala residues instead of the peptides
RAKDY did not cause a significant change in the
length ofprenyl products, indicating a requirement for
insertion of specific amino acid residues for lengthen-
ing the ultimate product chain. Moreover, this sugges-
ted the significance of some charged or polar residues
at the proper positions rather than expansion of the
interior space of the hydrophobic cleft.
In the crystal structure of E. coli UPP synthase
bound with E,E-FPP, helix-3 is kinked to be closer to
the E,E-FPP binding domain compared with the struc-
ture without substrates [28], indicating that the structure
of UPP synthase shifts to the closed conformation when
the substrate binding site is shared with the allylic sub-
strate. The interior of the large hydrophobic cleft, sur-
rounded by sheet-2, sheet-4, helix-2, and helix-3, mainly
consists of hydrophobic residues [5]. Hydrophobic resi-
dues on kinked helix-3 in the closed conformation may
function as a guide rail to introduce the elongating pre-
nyl chain in the proper direction (Figs 5A and B).
Although most of residues constituting the hydrophobic
cleft are highly conserved among cis-prenyltransferases,
residues localized on helix-3 show a wide diversity
(Fig. 3A). Moreover, the domain in which we intro-
duced extra amino acid residues corresponded to the
hinge region of the kinked helix-3 (Fig. 5B). Therefore,
we proposed that charged residues inserted at the hinge
region of helix-3 might control the bending direction of
the growing hydrophobic prenylchain along the hydro-
phobic interior of helix-3 so that the hydrophobic cleft
could accommodate the bulk of the prenylchain to fit a
suitable size during enzymatic elongation.
In conclusion, we identified critical regulatory
domains in cis-prenyltransferases for determination of
the ultimate product chain length, and proposed a
model for chain-length determination. Further elucida-
tion and manipulationof chain-length determination
mechanisms of cis-prenyltransferase are not only
attractive but also very important as a biotechnological
aspect because biological materials composed of the
polymer of IPP with cis-configuration such as natural
rubber, can be used for the development of novel func-
tional materials.
Y. Kharel et al. Product chainlengthof cis-prenyltransferases
FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 653
Experimental procedures
Materials and general procedures
Nonlabelled IPP and E,E-FPP were synthesized according
to Davisson et al. [31]. 1-
14
C-labelled IPP (1.95 TBqÆmol
)1
)
was from Amersham Biosciences (Princeton, NJ, USA).
Restriction enzymes and other DNA modifying enzymes
were from TaKaRa Bio (Otu, Japan) and TOYOBO
(Osaka, Japan). Potato acid phosphatase was from Sigma.
Precoated reversed phase TLC plate, LKC-18 was pur-
chased from Whatman (Brentford, UK). The yeast strain
SNH23-7D, mutant allele rer2-2 [7], and pRS316 containing
SRT1 [8] were kindly provided by A. Nakano and M. Sato
(RIKEN, Japan). The expression vector for yeast, pJR1133
was kindly provided by A. Ferrer (University of Barcelona,
Spain). Restriction enzyme digestions, transformations, and
other standard molecular biological techniques were carried
out as described by Sambrook et al. [32]. All other chemi-
cals were of analytical grade.
Multiple alignments and homology modelling
of mutant enzymes
Amino acid sequences ofcis-prenyltransferases already
identified were aligned using the clustal w Multiple
Sequence Alignment Program [33]. The resulting alignment
was edited by seqvu (Shareware alignment programme,
Garvan Institute, Sydney, Australia). Three-dimensional
models for the mutants, Rv1086 and Srt1p were obtained
by The swiss-model alignment interface (http://swissmodel.
expasy.org/) using multiple alignment of cis-prenyltrans-
ferases and crystal structures of UPP synthase from
M. luteus B-P 26 [5] or E. coli [21,28,29] as structural
templates.
Expression vector system and site-directed
mutagenesis
The expression plasmid, pMluUEX for M. luteus B-P 26
UPP synthase [20] was used as template for preparation of
the mutants. Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out
according to protocols for the Gene Editor in vitro Site-
Directed Mutagenesis System (Promega, Madison, MI,
USA). The single stranded wild-type UPP synthase gene used
as template in the mutagenesis reaction was prepared by
infection of E. coli JM109 cells (TaKaRa) harboring
pMluUEX with R408 helper phages. Mutagenic oligonucleo-
tides designed to produce the desired mutant enzymes were:
5¢-CAGTTGACAATAAGTACAGCG-3¢ (for A72L ⁄ F73L);
5¢-CTTTAGGTCGACTCAAATTTTCAGTTGACAATAA
GTACAGCG-3¢ (for A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L); 5¢-CCGGCCAG
TGTTCATCGATAAATAC-3¢ (for F223H); 5¢-CTTTAGG
TCGACTCAAAT TTTCAG TTGACA ATAAGTACA GCG-3 ¢
and 5¢-CCGGCCAGTGTTCATCGATAAATAC-3¢ (for
A72L ⁄ F73L ⁄ W78L ⁄ F223H). For insertion of three or five
Fig. 5. Large hydrophobic cleft of M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase with or without FPP. Models were built based on the crystal structure of
E,E-FPP complex of UPP synthase from E. coli (Protein Data Bank No. 1V7U). Then, the structure of E,E-FPP was superimposed on the
models. Side chains are coloured as follows: nonpolar, grey; uncharged polar, yellow; acidic, red; basic, blue. (A) Large hydrophobic cleft of
M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase (Protein Data Bank No. 1F75) consisting of helix-2, helix-3, sheet-2, and sheet-4. Only side chains facing
towards the inside of the hydrophobic cleft are shown. (B) Structural model of the large hydrophobic cleft of M. luteus B-P 26 UPP synthase
with E,E-FPP. Only side chains facing towards the inside of the hydrophobic cleft are shown. The white arrow indicates a predicted direction
of the prenylchain elongation. The circle indicates regions in which the extra amino acid residues, EKE or RAKDY were introduced.
Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases Y. Kharel et al.
654 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS
amino acid residues between Pro101 and Glu102 of M. luteus
B-P 26 UPP synthase, oligonucleotides used were: 5¢-CAAT
GAGTTCCTCCTTCTCCGGTAAAAATGTG-3¢ (for EKE);
and 5¢-AACATTTTTTTCAATGAGCTCATAGTCCTTG
GCTCTCGGTAAAAATG-3¢ (for RAKDY). Introduction
of mutations was confirmed by sequencing whole nucleotide
sequences using the dideoxy chain-termination method with
a DNA sequencer (LI-COR, model 4200, ALOKA, Tokyo,
Japan).
Construction of deletion mutant for Srt1p
The SRT1 expression plasmid was constructed with the
SRT1 fragment amplified by PCR using appropriate prim-
ers. The sense and antisense primers, 5¢-CGTTTCTGGGT
ACCATAATGAAAATGC-3¢ and 5¢-CTAGTTGTCGACT
TTTACTTATTCATC-3¢, respectively, were designed to
create a KpnI site upstream the starting codon ATG, and a
SalI site downstream the stop codon TAA, respectively.
The PCR product was digested with KpnI and SalI, and
separated on a 1% agarose gel. The desired band was elut-
ed, and ligated into the pBluescript II SK(–) vector, then
digested with the same restriction enzymes to give
pBS-Srt1. Five amino acids deletion construct of Srt1p
(Srt1p-delta) was generated using the Gene Editor in vitro
Site-Directed Mutagenesis System (Promega) with the
primer 5¢-GATGAATTCGCGAAGAAGGATCCCTTAT
AC-3¢ to obtain pBS-Srt1p-delta. Wild-type SRT1 and
the mutant Srt1p-delta were digested with KpnI and SalI,
subcloned into pJR1133 vector, and digested with the same
restriction enzymes to give pJR1133-Srt1p and pJR1133-
Srt1p-delta, respectively.
Overproduction and purification of UPP synthase
mutant
Each construct for expression of target proteins was
introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells, and cells were
cultured in Luria–Bertani or M9YG medium. The proce-
dures us for overproduction and purification of UPP syn-
thase mutants and the wild-type enzyme were essentially
similar to those described in a previous paper [20,24].
Purity of the mutant enzymes was analysed by
SDS ⁄ PAGE with Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Pro-
tein concentrations were measured by the method of
Bradford with BSA as standard.
Expressions of Srt1p and Srt1p-delta in yeasts
pJR1133-Srt1p and pJR1133-Srt1p-delta plasmids were
introduced into yeast rer2-2 mutant strain, SNH23-7D
(MATa rer2 mfa1::TRP1::HIS3 ura3 trp1 ade2 leu2 his3
lys2), which is deficient in the activity of DedolPP synthase
[8]. Transformants were selected as Ura
+
colonies, were
cultured at 23 °C on agar plates containing minimal medium
(0.16% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.5%
ammonium sulfate, 2% glucose, supplemented with
60 lgÆmL
)1
Leu and 30 lgÆmL
)1
Lys). Yeast cells were
grown in 100 mL minimal medium until the late-logarithmic
phase (OD
600
of 1.0).
Preparation of yeast membrane fraction proteins
from wild-type Srt1p and Srt1p-delta mutants
Yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 g for
5 min, suspended in 300 lL zymolyase buffer (50 mm
Tris ⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 10 mm MgCl
2
,1m sorbitol, 30 mm
dithiothreitol, 2 mgÆmL
)1
zymolyase 100T), and incubated
at 30 °C for 30 min. The spheroplast-formed cells were
collected by centrifugation at 1000 g for 5 min, and resus-
pended in 400 lL breakage buffer (50 mm KH
2
PO
4
pH 7.5, 1 m dithiothreitol, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 lgÆmL
)1
aprotinin, 1 lgÆmL
)1
leupeptin, and
1 lgÆmL
)1
pepstatin A). Using an equal volume of glass
beads, cell suspensions were vortexed for 30 s, followed by
incubation in an ice bath for 1 min, repeated five times.
Cell lysates were centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min to remove
unbroken cells. Supernatants were further centrifuged at
13 000 g for 10 min to separate membrane and soluble
fractions.
Cis-Prenyltransferase assay and product analysis
UPP synthase activity was measured by determining
amounts of [1-
14
C]IPP incorporated into butanol-extracta-
ble polyprenyl diphosphates. The standard assay mixture
contained 100 mm Tris ⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 0.5 mm MgCl
2
,
10 lm E,E-FPP, 10 lm 1-
14
C-labelledIPP (37 MBqÆmol
)1
),
0.05% (w ⁄ v) Triton X-100, and a suitable amount of
enzyme solution in a final volume of 200 lL. For the
yeast cis-prenyltransferase assay, the standard reaction
mixture contained (final volume of 100 lL) 25 mm phos-
phate buffer pH 7.5, 20 mm 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 m m
potassium fluoride, 4 mm MgCl
2
,50lm [1-
14
C]IPP,
10 lm E,E-FPP, and 50 lg proteins of membrane frac-
tions. After incubation at 30 °C for 30 min, reaction
products were extracted with 1-butanol saturated with
water, and radioactivity in the butanol extract was meas-
ured with an Aloka LSC-1000 liquid scintillation counter.
For product analysis, radioactive prenyl diphosphate
products in the reaction mixture were hydrolysed to the
corresponding alcohols with potato acid phosphatase
according to the method of Fujii et al. [34]. Product
alcohols were extracted with pentane, and analysed by
reversed phase TLC with a solvent system of acet-
one ⁄ water (19 : 1) (for bacterial cis-prenyltransferase) or
acetone ⁄ water (39 : 1) (for yeast cis-prenyltransferase).
Positions of authentic standards were visualized with
Y. Kharel et al. Product chainlengthof cis-prenyltransferases
FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 655
iodine vapour, and distribution of radioactivity was ana-
lysed with a Fuji BAS 1000 Mac Bioimage Analyzer.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr A. Nakano and Dr M. Sato
(RIKEN, Japan) for kindly providing the yeast strain
SNH23-7D, and Dr A. Ferrer (University of Barce-
lona, Spain) for kindly providing the vector pJR1133.
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid
for Scientific Research from JSPS, Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science, and by the Foundations of
Takeda Science, Eno Science, The Yuasa International,
and by the Sumitomo Foundation.
References
1 Ogura K & Koyama T (1998) Enzymatic aspects of iso-
prenoid chain elongation. Chem Rev 98, 1263–1276.
2 Wang KC & Ohnuma S (2000) Isoprenyl diphosphate
synthases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1529, 33–48.
3 Kharel Y & Koyama T (2003) Molecular analysis of
cis-prenyl chain elongating enzymes. Nat Prod Report
20, 111–118.
4 Shimizu N, Koyama T & Ogura K (1998) Molecular
cloning, expression, and purification of undecaprenyl
diphosphate synthase. No sequence similarity between
E- and Z-prenyl diphosphate synthases. J Biol Chem
273, 19476–19481.
5 Fujihashi M, Zhang Y-W, Higuchi Y, Li X-Y, Koyama
T & Miki K (2001) Crystal structure of cis-prenyl chain
elongating enzyme, undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4337–4342.
6 Apfel CM, Takacs B, Fountoulakis M, Stieger M &
Keck W (1999) Use of genomics to identify bacterial
undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthetase: cloning, expres-
sion, and characterization of the essential uppS gene.
J Bacteriol 181, 483–492.
7 Sato M, Sato K, Nishikawa S, Hirata A, Kato J &
Nakano A (1999) The yeast RER2 gene, identified by
endoplasmic reticulum protein localization mutations,
encodes cis-prenyltransferase, a key enzyme in dolichol
synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 19, 471–483.
8 Sato M, Fujisaki S, Sato K, Nishimura Y & Nakano A
(2001) Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two cis-pre-
nyltransferases with different properties and localiza-
tions. Implication for their distinct physiological roles in
dolichol synthesis. Genes Cells 6, 495–506.
9 Oh SK, Han KH, Ryu SB & Kang H (2000) Molecular
cloning, expression, and functional analysis of a cis-pre-
nyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Implications in
rubber biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 275, 18482–18488.
10 Cunillera N, Arro
´
M, Fore
´
s O, Manzano D & Ferrer A
(2000) Characterization of dehydrodolichyl diphosphate
synthase of Arabidopsis thaliana, a key enzyme in doli-
chol biosynthesis. FEBS Lett 477, 170–174.
11 Schulbach MC, Brennan PJ & Crick DC (2000) Identifi-
cation of a short (C
15
) chain Z-isoprenyl diphosphate
synthase and a homologous long (C
50
) chain isoprenyl
diphosphate synthase in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J Biol Chem 275, 22876–22881.
12 Endo S, Zhang Y-W, Takahashi S & Koyama T (2002)
Identification of human dehydrodolichyl diphosphate
synthase gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1625, 291–295.
13 Asawatreratanakul K, Zhang Y-W, Wititsuwannakul D,
Wititsuwannakul R, Takahashi S, Rattanapittayapron
A & Koyama T (2003) Molecular cloning, expression
and characterization of cDNA encoding cis-prenyltrans-
ferases from Hevea brasiliensis. A key factor participat-
ing in natural rubber biosynthesis. Eur J Biochem 270,
4671–4680.
14 Ohnuma S, Narita K, Nakazawa T, Ishida C, Takeuchi
Y, Ohto C & Nishino T (1996) A role of the amino acid
residue located on the fifth position before the first
aspartate-rich motif of farnesyl diphosphate synthase on
determination of the final product. J Biol Chem 271,
30748–30754.
15 Wang K & Ohnuma S (1999) Chain-length determina-
tion mechanismof isoprenyl diphosphate synthases and
implications for molecular evolution. Trends Biochem
Sci 24, 445–451.
16 Tarshis LC, Proteau PJ, Kellogg BA, Sacchettini JC &
Poulter CD (1996) Regulation of product chain length
by isoprenyl diphosphate synthases. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 93, 15018–15023.
17 Fujikura K, Zhang Y-W, Yoshizaki H, Nishino T &
Koyama T (2000) Significance of Asn-77 and Trp-78 in
the catalytic function of undecaprenyl diphosphate
synthase of Micrococcus luteus B-P 26. J Biochem
(Tokyo) 128, 917–922.
18 Pan J-J, Yang L-W & Liang P-H (2000) Effect of site-
directed mutagenesis of the conserved aspartate and glu-
tamate on E. coli undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase
catalysis. Biochemistry 39, 13856–13816.
19 Pan J-J, Chiou S-T & Liang P-H (2000) Product distri-
bution and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of Escheri-
chia coli undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase reaction.
Biochemistry 39, 10936–10942.
20 Kharel Y, Zhang Y-W, Fujihashi M, Miki K &
Koyama T (2001) Identification of significant residues
for homoallylic substrate binding of Micrococcus luteus
B-P 26 undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase. J Biol Chem
276, 28459–28464.
21 Ko TP, Chen YK, Robinson H, Tsai PC, Gao YG, Chen
AP, Wang AH & Liang PH (2001) Mechanismof product
chain lengthdetermination and the role of a flexible loop
in Escherichia coli undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate synthase
catalysis. J Biol Chem 276, 47474–47482.
Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases Y. Kharel et al.
656 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS
[...]... the determinationof dolichyl phosphates in tissues Annal Biochem 156, 380–385 27 Matsuoka S, Sagami H, Kurisaki A & Ogura K (1991) Variable product specificity of microsomal dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase from rat liver J Biol Chem 266, 3464–3468 28 Chang SY, Ko TP, Chen AP, Wang AH & Liang PH (2004) Substrate binding mode and reaction mechanismof undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase Product chain. .. undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase Product chainlengthofcis-prenyltransferases 29 30 31 32 33 34 deduced from crystallographic studies Protein Sci 13, 971–978 Guo RT, Ko TP, Chen AP, Kuo CJ, Wang AH & Liang PH (2005) Crystal structures of undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase in complex with magnesium, isopentenyl pyrophosphate, and farnesyl thiopyrophosphate: roles of the metal ion and conserved residues... AH & Liang PH (2002) Probing the conformational change of Escherichia coli undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase during catalysis using an inhibitor and tryptophan mutants J Biol Chem 277, 7369–7376 23 Fujikura K, Zhang Y-W, Fujihashi M, Miki K & Koyama T (2003) Mutational analysis of allylic substrate binding site of Micrococcus luteus B-P 26 undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase Biochemistry 42, 4035– 4041... Kharel Y, Zhang Y-W, Fujihashi M, Miki K & Koyama T (2003) Significance of highly conserved aromatic residues in Micrococcus luteus B-P 26 undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase J Biochem (Tokyo) 134, 819–826 25 Yamada K, Yokohama H, Abe S, Katayama K & Sato T (1985) High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determinationof dolichols in tissues and plasma Annal Biochem 150, 26–31 26 Yamada K,... York Thompson JD, Higgins DG & Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680 Fujii H, Koyama T & Ogura K (1982) Efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of polyprenyl pyrophosphates Biochim Biophys Acta 712, 716–718 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 647–657... Barontini S, Papi C, Minutolo F, Bertini S, Brennan PJ & Crick DC (2001) Purification, enzymatic characterization, and inhibition of the Z-farnesyl diphosphate synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis J Biol Chem 276, 11624– 11630 Davisson VJ, Woodside AB & Poulter CD (1985) Synthesis of allylic and homoallylic isoprenoid pyrophosphates Methods Enzymol 110, 130–144 Sambrook J, Fritsch EF & Maniatis T (1989) . determination of
the ultimate product chain length, and proposed a
model for chain- length determination. Further elucida-
tion and manipulation of chain- length determination
mechanisms. Manipulation of prenyl chain length determination
mechanism of cis-prenyltransferases
Yugesh Kharel*, Seiji Takahashi*,