Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống
1
/ 114 trang
THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU
Thông tin cơ bản
Định dạng
Số trang
114
Dung lượng
496,63 KB
Nội dung
Corporate Governance
Best Practices
A BlueprintforthePost-Enron Era
SR-03-05
special report
Members of the Advisory Board
BP plc (UK)
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Heidrick & Struggles
Jones Day
KPMG
McKinsey & Company
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Pfizer Inc
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association—
College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF)
Members of the Center
Baxter International Inc.
The Coca-Cola Company
Computer Associates International, Inc.
CSX Corporation
Equiserve
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc.
Southern Company Services, Inc.
Standard Life Investments Ltd. (UK)
For further information regarding the Center,
please contact Diane Insolia, Center Coordinator at
845 Third Ave., New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212 339 0392
Fax: 212 836 9711
e-mail: diane.insolia@conference-board.org
The Conference Board creates and disseminates knowledge
about management and the marketplace to help businesses
strengthen their performance and better serve society.
Working as a global, independent membership organization
in the public interest, we conduct research, convene conferences,
make forecasts, assess trends, publish information and analysis,
and bring executives together to learn from one another.
The Conference Board is a not-for-profit organization
and holds 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt status in the United States.
Disclaimer
This report is intended for educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this report is
to be considered as the rendering of legal or accounting advice. Readers are responsible for
obtaining legal advice from their own legal counsel or accounting advisors.
About the Global CorporateGovernance Research Center
The Conference Board’s Global CorporateGovernance Research Center (Center)
brings together corporations and institutional investors. The Center’s objective is
to assist corporations to enhance their governance processes and thereby inspire
confidence and facilitate capital formation in today’s globally competitive marketplace.
Corporate Governance
Best Practices
A BlueprintforthePost-Enron Era
by Carolyn Kay Brancato
and Christian A. Plath
4 CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board
Roundtable project sponsors
THE CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES
The member insurers of the Chubb Group
of Insurance Companies form a multi-billion
dollar organization providing property and
casualty insurance for personal and commercial customers
worldwide through 5,000 agents and brokers. Chubb’s
global network includes branches and affiliates throughout
North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Australia.
Chubb is a leading provider of directors and officers (D&O)
liability insurance.
PFIZER INC
Pfizer Inc discovers, develops, manufactures,
and markets leading prescription medicines for
humans and animals and many of the world’s best-known
consumer brands.
Additional sponsors
KPMG Audit Committee Institute
PricewaterhouseCooopers LLP
Sponsor/participants
Arch Chemicals, Inc.
Avon Products, Inc.
Corn Products International, Inc.
Footstar Inc.
Oak Technology
Spectrum Brands
Wellmark, Inc.
Contributors
Baxter International, Inc.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
Potomac Electric Power Company
Stanford Law School’s Executive Education Program
TIAA-CREF
The University of Delaware’s John L. Weinberg
Center forCorporate Governance
About this report
Materials for this report were gathered at a series of nation-wide roundtables held
during 2002 in New York; Washington, D.C. (hosted by Potomac Electric Power Company);
Stanford, California (hosted by Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., and the Stanford
Law School’s Executive Education Program); Chicago (hosted by Baxter International Inc.),
the University of Delaware (hosted by the John L. Weinberg Center forCorporate Governance);
and at the offices of TIAA-CREF in New York.
Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 5
Corporate GovernanceBest Practices
A BlueprintforthePost-Enron Era
contents
7 A New Framework forCorporate Governance
Corporate Governance Practices
10 Role of the Board
13 CorporateGovernance Guidelines
14 Board’s Access to Information
16 Board’s Mix of Skills and Individual Director Qualifications
18 Board Independence
21 Board Leadership
23 Board Committee Structure and Size
24 Role of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
26 Role of the Compensation Committee
29 Chief Governance Officer
30 Measuring Company Performance
32 Board and Director Performance Evaluation
34 Succession Planning and Leadership Development
Audit Practices
36 Audit Committee Role and Responsibilities
38 Audit Committee Charter
40 Audit Committee Composition and Independence
43 Audit Committee Communication and Reporting
45 Oversight - Internal Audit
47 Oversight - External Audit
Disclosure, Compliance and Ethics
51 Disclosure Practices
54 Internal Controls
57 Risk Assessment and Management
59 Director and Officer Liability and D&O Liability Insurance
63 Ethics Oversight
Appendices
66 1 Legislation and Proposed Exchange Standards Comparison Chart
94 2 Hypothetical, Inc., CorporateGovernance Principles
96 3 Independence Comparisons
99 4 Sample CorporateGovernance Committee Charter (General Electric Corporation)
100 5 Sample Director Self-Assessment Worksheet
102 6 Sample Chief Executive Officer Evaluation Form
106 7 Sample Audit Committee Charter and Responsibilities Checklist (Microsoft Corporation)
110 8 KPMG Audit Committee Institute Basic Principles for Audit Committees
112 9 Excerpt from Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code
Report by The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
About the authors
Dr. Carolyn Kay Brancato is the Director of The Conference
Board’s Global CorporateGovernance Research Center and
the Directors’ Institute. She also served as Director of The
Conference Board’s Commission on Public Trust and Private
Enterprise. She is the author of two books on corporate
governance: Getting Listed on Wall Street and Institutional
Investors and CorporateGovernance (both published by
Business One Irwin). Dr. Brancato has appeared as a guest
speaker at major corporategovernance programs in the
United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Australia,
Sweden, Brazil, Chile, India, Singapore, Hong Kong,Thailand,
Indonesia, Japan, Malta, and Oman.
Christian A. Plath is a Senior CorporateGovernance
Consultant with the Conference Board’s Global Corporate
Governance Research Center. He was formerly the director
of global corporategovernance research at the Investor
Responsibility Research Center (IRRC) and both writes and
speaks widely on corporategovernance issues.
6 CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board
Aksys Ltd.
APAC Customer Services, Inc.
ArchChemicals
Asian Venture Capital Journal
Avon Products, Inc.
Baxter International, Inc.
The Boeing Company
Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison
Brunswick Corporation
The Business Roundtable
CDW Computer Centers, Inc.
Chasm Group
Corn Products International, Inc.
CSX Corporation
Davis & Harman LLP
Deere & Company
DelMonte Foods Company
Diamond Cluster International, Inc.
D.J. Hill & Associates, Inc.
Embassy of France
Equity Office Properties Trust
Footstar, Inc.
Freddie Mac
Fordham University School of Law
Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.,
Inc.
Gear Holdings, Inc.
Genentech, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
LLP
Grubb & Ellis Co.
H & Q Asia Pacific
Halo Branded Solutions
Heidrick & Struggles International,
Inc.
J.P. Morgan Partners Asia
KPMG
Marriot International, Inc.
Masters Governance Consulting, LLC
McKinsey & Co., Inc.
Mercer Delta Consulting, LLC
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Methode Electronics, Inc.
Monsanto Company
Motorola
Newell Rubbermaid
Oak Technology, Inc.
Olin Corporation
Paul, Hasting, Janofsky & Walker LLP
PeopleSoft, Inc.
Pfizer Inc
Potomac Electric Power Company
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Real Networks
Richards, Layton & Finger
Sequoia Capital
Singapore Institute of Management
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP
Spectrum Brands
Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
TIAA-CREF
Tribune Company
United Stationers, Inc.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USG Corporation
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP
Wellmark, Inc.
Wink Communications
WKB Advisory Services
Woodhead Industries, Inc.
Acknowledgments
Participating companies and organizations
A number of facilitators and subject matter discussants
provided special input at the various sessions including:
William K. Brown Jr., Catherine T. Dixon, John W. Edwards II,
June Eichbaum, Anthony S. Galban, Randolf Hurst Hardock,
R. William Ide III, Cary I. Klafter, Richard Koppes, Jon J. Masters,
Nicholas G. Moore, Ronald Mueller, David Nygren,
John F. Olson, Scott A. Reed, Laraine Rothenberg, Alan
Rudnick, Richard Steinberg, Mark C.Terrell, John T. Thompson,
William Torgerson, and Carol Ward.
We are also grateful to Professor Charles E. Elson for
inviting the following members of the Delaware courts to
give us their perspectives: Vice Chancellor Stephen P. Lamb,
Justice Myron T. Steele, Vice Chancellor Leo E. Strine, and
Justice Joseph T. Walsh.
Finally, we would like to thank Donovan Hervig and
William K. Brown for providing draft materials for this report.
Timothy Dennison editor
Peter Drubin design
Pam Seenaraine production
Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 7
A New Framework for
Corporate Governance
The Enron bankruptcy, accompanied
by the WorldCom debacle and other
corporate scandals, has caused a sea
change in the attention given corporate
governance and in how directors are
viewed by the public, shareholders,
employees, and the courts.
Directors need to be sensitive and responsive to this
new level of scrutiny and exposure. To address this
new emphasis on corporate governance, The Conference
Board’s Global CorporateGovernance Research Center
convened a major Director/Senior Executive Roundtable
Project. Meetings were held throughout the year 2002
in New York; Washington, D.C.; Stanford, California;
Chicago; and Wilmington, Delaware. More than
100 directors and executives took part in sharing their
thoughts on evolving corporategovernance “best prac-
tices” in thepost-Enron era.
Parallel to these efforts, in June 2002, The Conference
Board convened a Commission on Public Trust and
Private Enterprise (Commission on Public Trust)
1
to
address the circumstances which led to the corporate
scandals that were widely reported during 2001-2002
and the subsequent decline of confidence in companies,
their leaders and American capital markets. The
Commission’s work articulates a series of principles
and best practice suggestions in three major areas—
executive compensation, corporate governance, and
audit and accounting issues—as they relate to publicly
held corporations.
2
This blueprintbestpractices report is the result of both
the Roundtable Project and the Commission’s work and
is intended to serve as a compendium of leading corpo-
rate governancepractices boards and management
should consider within the context of each company’s
unique circumstances.
“Corporate governance” is defined in this report as a sys-
tem of checks and balances between the board, manage-
ment and investors to produce an efficiently functioning
corporation, ideally geared to produce long-term value.
There are several aspects to this governance system that
should be noted at the outset:
1 Any governance system throughout the world is the
product of a series of legal, regulatory, and best prac-
tice elements. Each country’s regulatory and corporate
law system will shape the specifics of its corporate
governance. Corporategovernance systems in the
United States have been shaped by sets of pressures
from: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
with its regulatory oversight, stock exchanges with
their listing requirements; the U.S. Congress enacting
wide sweeping federal legislation; the courts, espe-
cially those in Delaware that, with case law, set prece-
dents; and institutional investors engaging in dialogue
with corporations and which use certain proxy voting
tactics such as the filing of shareowner proposals.
8 CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board
1
The 12-member Commission—co-chaired by Peter G. Peterson,
Chairman of The Blackstone Group and Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, and John W. Snow, former Chairman and CEO
of CSX Corporation and former Chairman of The Business Roundtable—
included prominent leaders from business, finance, public service, and
academia. Although the Commission was sponsored and supported by
The Conference Board, it enjoyed absolute independence and authority
in its findings and recommendations, and was financially supported by
the Pew Charitable Trusts.
2
The Commission issued its first set of findings and recommendations,
Part 1: Executive Compensation, on September 17, 2002. Part 2:
Corporate Governance and Part 3: Audit and Accounting were released
on January 9, 2003. The full text of the Commission’s report and recom-
mendations and a full list of the Commission’s members can be found at
www.conference-board.org/knowledge/governCommission.cfm
Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 9
2 Global corporategovernance research at The
Conference Board concludes that corporate gover-
nance models do not necessarily vary by country (e.g.
there is no one “U.S.” model of corporate governance
compared to an “Asian” model, or a “European”
model). Governance systems are largely determined
by the ownership structure of the company, regardless
of its geographic location. Thus, wherever the corpo-
ration is located, certain best practice elements, such
as the number of “independent” directors, will vary
depending on key ownership structures such as:
•
companies with widely held and dispersed
shareholders;
•
companies which are closely held by blocks
of investors;
•
companies which are family-owned businesses;
and
•
newly privatized businesses where the
government retains a residual investment.
3 Whatever the regulatory framework and the company’s
overall governance structure, this project suggests there
are a series of bestpractices which companies can and
should consider to generate long term value for the
corporation. It is fair to say that many boards have
begun to embrace good governance, although the colle-
gial format that is the basis for board interaction still
tends to discourage open disagreement. Change there-
fore tends to come either if there is an individual direc-
tor/CEO/senior executive who is a corporate
governance champion or if there is a crisis. Post-Enron,
companies can no longer look upon corporate gover-
nance as something thrust upon them from the outside.
In every boardroom around the country, directors are
asking themselves questions such as:
•
Is the board managed as effectively as
the company is managed?
•
What processes do we need to put in place
to make us more aware of “red flags” in
company operations?
•
How do we fulfill our monitoring role and yet
rely on management and external experts such
as accountants, attorneys, and consultants?
•
How can corporategovernance processes be
used to help keep our company viable and restore
public confidence in the capital markets?
•
How will instituting corporategovernance best
practices reduce corporate risk?
The catastrophic corporate failures of Enron, WorldCom,
and other companies have eroded confidence and shaken
corporate America to the core. The result is that corpo-
rate governance is more likely than ever to move from
something done as a result of external pressures to some-
thing boards can not afford to dismiss if they want to
properly manage risk, provide internal efficiencies in
running the corporation, and assure growth.
Of course, the landmark enactment of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act and the listing requirement changes proposed
by the major U.S. stock exchanges provide a rigorous
framework fora whole host of federally mandated inter-
nal controls and corporategovernance reforms
3
(see
Appendix 1). This document is intended to go beyond
what is required by law and capture best practices
4
for
internal corporategovernance reform; in short, it is
intended to be ablueprintfor success.
3
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ have both proposed
changes to their listing standards and are expected to be updated to conform
to final SEC regulation at which point they will be resubmitted to the SEC for
final review, public comment, revision (if required), and final approval.
4
This document provides an overview of leading practices related to
corporate governance and, although references are made to issued or
proposed changes to regulations and listing standards, is not meant to
provide a comprehensive review of these changes. The impact of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any final and proposed rules of the major U.S.
stock exchanges and the SEC have been closely tracked by many law
firms, accounting firms, consultants and other organizations. (See for
example, KPMG LLP, Sarbanes-Oxley: A Closer Look, January 2003 –
available at www.kpmg.com/aci – for discussion of some of the elements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act impacting audit committees and the status of
related issued or proposed SEC regulation.) Audit committees and senior
management should consult with legal counsel and accounting advisors
in the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any final and proposed
rules of the major U.S. stock exchanges and the SEC.
10 CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board
Corporate governancebestpractices are based on two
basic legal requirements that shape the fiduciary role of
the director:
•
the duty of care to be informed and exercise
appropriate diligence in making decisions and to
oversee the management of the corporation; and
•
the duty of loyalty to put the interests of the
corporation before those of the individual director.
In defining a system of board practices that leads to
board effectiveness, it is clear that instituting governance
best practices will provide the company with an internal
effectiveness structure and a tool to manage corporate
risk. The key to accomplishing this is to: make certain
that the company’s board is managed as well as the com-
pany itself is managed. Each board will be run differ-
ently according to the company’s stage of development,
ownership structure and size, and the mix of skills, and
personalities of the individual directors. The “one size
doesn’t fit all” rule clearly applies. On the other hand,
there are basic legal requirements, as well as “manage-
ment” skills that boards can and should adopt no matter
their configuration.
Corporate Governance Practices
Role of the Board
A strong and effective board should have a clear view of its role
in relationship to management. The board’s duty is to focus on guidance
and strategic oversight, while it is management’s duty to run the company’s business,
with the goal of increasing shareholder value
5
for the long term. CEOs and management
need to work with the board to establish the right kind of processes and communications
to ensure that the company is running effectively and in accordance with the board’s
basic fiduciary oversight requirements. The ultimate responsibility for directing the company,
however, lies with the board, since most state corporation statutes generally provide that
the business of the company shall be managed under the direction of the board.
The specifics of the board’s role will vary with size, stage and strategy of the company,
and talents and personalities of the CEO and the board.
5
U.S. corporate law dictates that companies be run forthe benefit of
shareholders, while European companies have more of a “stakeholder”
focus. Most U S. observers note, however, that companies can not create
shareholder value without taking stakeholders into consideration. A full
discussion of the shareholder versus stakeholder debate is beyond the
scope of this report.
[...]... in the strategy Evaluation of past strategies including identification of successful strategies and an analysis of elements that were not successful 12 CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board CorporateGovernance Guidelines The board should have a set of corporate guidelines in place to lay down the framework forthegovernance of the company and... interests of the company and its shareowners Typically, the CEO is a member of the board, but he or she is also a part of the management team the board oversees This dual role can present a potential for conflict, particularly in cases where the CEO attempts to dominate the management of the company and operations of the board Therefore, a crucial challenge for companies is striking the appropriate balance... Environmental compliance Other measures specific to each company Source: Carolyn Kay Brancato, Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance: BestPracticesfor Increasing Corporate Value (Chicago: Business One Irwin, 1998), p.45 30 Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board Such performance measurements may also be used as the basis for considering... Best Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 31 Board and Director Performance Evaluation All directors, management, and employees should be evaluated on an annual basis In this context, corporations should consider a three-tier director evaluation mechanism which includes a means to evaluate the performance of the board as a whole, the performance of each committee, and the. .. level, governance functions are coordinated among departments and are accorded sufficient importance within the company CorporateGovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 29 Measuring Company Performance The board must devise ways to effectively and continuously monitor the company’s progress against the stated goals Strategic performance measures that track both... that the individual’s service on the committee is in thebest interests of the company and shareholders The company must disclose the use of such an exception in the next annual proxy statement, including the nature of the individual’s relationship to the company and the basis forthe board’s determination 26 Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board The. .. have an entirely independent compensation committee that should take primary responsibility for ensuring that the compensation programs, and values transferred to management through cash pay, stock, and stock-based awards, are fair and appropriate to attract, retain, and motivate management, and are reasonable in view of company economics, and of the relevant practices of other, similar companies The. .. interests of the company and its shareholders The issuer is also required to disclose the use of such an exception in the next annual proxy statement, as well as the nature of the individual’s relationship to the company and the basis forthe board’s determination Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 25 Role of the Compensation Committee Companies should... or equivalent; or • the head of the nominating /governance committee 23 See Appendix 5 fora sample director self-evaluation worksheet 32 Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 4 It will identify needed areas of improvement in areas such as: • the balance of power between the board and management; • focusing the board more on long-term strategy; •... of the board The board should conduct a self-evaluation at least annually to determine whether it, its committees, and individual directors are functioning effectively See page 1 8-1 9 and Appendix 1 fora summary of the NYSE’s independence requirements Corporate GovernanceBest Practices: ABlueprintforthePost-EnronEraThe Conference Board 13 Board’s Access to Information The effectiveness of the . Board 5
Corporate Governance Best Practices
A Blueprint for the Post-Enron Era
contents
7 A New Framework for Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Practices
10. Center for Corporate Governance) ;
and at the offices of TIAA-CREF in New York.
Corporate Governance Best Practices: A Blueprint for the Post-Enron Era The