VE
=-
Hình 6. Thu hoạch dưa leo
Phục lục 2. Tính toán hiệu quả kinh tế cho thí nghiệm
Phục lục 2.1 Tính toán hiệu quả kinh tê cho thí nghiệm 1
Bảng 1. Chi phí trên 1000m” cho khoảng cách 40cm của từng giông
MDI
STT Chỉ tiêu đánh giá DVT . Đongiá Thanh tiền
solwong (q0Q0ay (10004)
1 Công lao động 62,334.4
1 Tui bau Tui 3125 1 2,343.8
2 Công thu hoạch Công 65 200 13,000.0 3 Công chăm sóc Công 31 200 6,200.0
4 Tiền điện kg 3125 0.124 387.5 5 Tiền nước Lít 3125 0.5 1,562.5 6 Công xếp bầu công 16 200.0 3,200.0
7 Công dọn vườn công 20 200.0 4,000.0
§ Giá thê đã xử lý bầu 3125 4.0 12,500.0 9 Đầu nhỏ giọt cái 3125 1.125 3,515.6 10 Dinh dưỡng bầu 3125 4.0 12,500.0
11 Kep cai 3125 1.0 3,125.0 H Chi phí VTNN 42,180.)
1 Nhà lưới (1 vụ) khoán 1.0 20000 20,000.0 2 Hệ thống tưới trung tâm (1 vụ) Khoán 1.0 3000 3,000.0
3 Dõy ống ỉ 16 m 1400.0 6 8,400.0 4 Day treo kg 20.0 120 2,400.0 5 Vi sinh Lit 250.0 15 3,750.0
6 Thuốc trừ sâu BVTV Bình 40 17 680.0 7 Thuốc trừ bệnh BVTV Bình 40.0 5 200.0 8 Công phun thuốc Bình 80.0 25 2,000.0 9 Phân bón lá Bình 70.0 15 1,050.0 10 Công phun phan bón lá Bình 70.0 10 700.0
out Chi phí giống
1 Giống LUCAS 603 Hat 3125 3 4,687.5 2 Giống NL107 Hat 3125 2 6,250.0 3 Giéng KICHI 207 Hat 3125 3 9,375.0 4 Giống KAMI 98 Hạt 3125 1 3,125.0
79
Bang 2. Tổng chi phí cho từng giống khoảng cách 40cm
TEN GIONG LUCAS 603 NL107 KICHI 207 KAMI 98 TỎNG 109.201,9 110.764,4 113.889,4 104.829,4
Bang 3. Chi phí trên 1000m” cho khoảng cách 50cm của từng giống
MD2
STT Chỉ tiêu đánh giá DVT : Don gid Thành tiền
soluong (10oođ) (1000đ)
I Công lao động 49,572.5 1 Túi bâu Túi 2500 1.00 2,500.0 2 Céng thu hoach Cong 50 200.0 10,000.0 3 Công chăm sóc Công 26 200.0 5,200.0 4 Tiền điện kg 2500 0.124 310.0 5 Tiền nước Lít 2500 0.5 1,250.0 6 Công xếp bầu công 10 200.0 2,000.0 7 Công dọn vườn công 15 200.0 3,000.0 8 Giá thể đã xử lý bầu 2500 4.0 10,000.0 9 Đầu nhỏ giọt cái 2500 1.125 2,812.5 10 Dinh dưỡng bầu 2500 4.0 10,000.0 11 Kẹp cái 2500 1.0 2,500.0 H Chi phí VTNN 40,220.0 1 Nhà lưới (1 vụ) khoán 1.0 20000 20,000.0 2 Hệ thống tưới trung tâm (1vụ) Khoán 1.0 3000 3,000.0 3 Dõy ống ỉ 16 m 1400.0 6 8,400.0 4 Dây treo kg 15.0 120 1,800.0 5 Vi sinh Lít 200.0 15 3,000.0 6 Thuốc trừ sâu BVTV Bình 35 17 595.0 7 Thuốc trừ bệnh BVTV Bình 35.0 5 175.0 8 Công phun thuốc Bình 70.0 25 1,750.0 9 Phân bón lá Bình 60.0 15 900.0 10 Công phun phân bón lá Bình 60.0 10 600.0
va Chi phi giống
1 Giống LUCAS 603 Hạt 2500 1.5 3,750.0 2 Giống NL107 Hạt 2500 2.0 5,000.0 3 Giống KICHI 207 Hạt 2500 3.0 7,500.0 4 Giống KAMI 98 Hạt 2500 1.0 2,500.0 Bảng 3. Tông chi phí cho từng giống khoảng cách 50cm
TÊN GIONG LUCAS 603 NL107 KICHI 207 KAMI 98 TONG 93.542,5 94.792,5 97.292,5 92.292,5
Bảng 4. Chi phí trên 1000m” cho khoảng cách 60cm của từng giống
MD3
STT Chỉ tiêu đánh giá DVT Z Đơn giá Thành tiền
số lượng (40004) (1000đ)
I Công lao động 37,673.2 1 Túi bâu Túi 2083 1.00 2,083.0 2 Công thu hoạch Công 35 200.0 7,000.0 3 Công chăm sóc Công 15 200.0 3,000.0 4 Tiền điện kg 2083 0.124 258.3 5 Tiền nước Lít 2083 0.5 1,041.5 6 Công xếp bầu công 6 200.0 1,200.0 7 Công dọn vườn công 10 200.0 2,000.0 8 Giá thể đã xử lý bầu 2083 4.0 8,332.0 9 Đầu nhỏ giọt cái 2083 1.125 2,343.4 10 Dinh dưỡng bầu 2083 4.0 8,332.0 11 Kẹp cái 2083 1.0 2,083.0 II Chi phi VTNN 37,540.0 4 Nhà lưới (1 vụ) khoán 1.0 20000 20,000.0 2 Hệ thống tưới trung tâm (1vụ) Khoán 1.0 3000 3,000.0
3 Dõy ống ỉ 16 m 1400.0 6 8,400.0
4 Dây treo kg 10.0 120 1,200.0 5 Vi sinh Lít 150.0 15 2,250.0 6 Thuốc trừ sâu BVTV Bình 20 17 340.0 7 Thuốc trừ bệnh BVTV Bình 20.0 5 100.0 8 Công phun thuốc Bình 40.0 25 1,000.0 9 Phân bón lá Bình 50.0 15 750.0 10 Công phun phân bón lá Bình 50.0 10 500.0
Il Chi phi giống MD3
1 Giống LUCAS 603 Hạt 2083 1.5 3,124.5 2 Giống NL107 Hat 2083 2.0 4,166.0
3 Giống KICHI 207 Hạt 2083 3.0 6,249.0 4 Giống KAMI 98 Hạt 2083 1.0 2,083.0
Bảng 5. Tổng chi phí cho từng giống khoảng cach 60cm
TÊN GIONG — LUCAS 603 NL107 KICHI 207 KAMI 98 TONG 78.337,7 79.379,2 81.462,2 77.296,2
Ước tính nhu cầu nước của cây trồng ET,
Trước khi thực hiện thí nghiệm, căn cứ các số liệu nhiệt độ, độ ẩm, tốc độ gió dựa trên số liệu thời tiết trung bình trong nhà màng ở khu vực thí nghiệm từ các tháng dự kiến thí nghiệm năm 2020, nhu cầu ước tính của cây trồng được tính toán
theo công thức (Brouwer và Heibloem, 1986):
81
ET.=K,x ETo Trong đó:
- hệ số cây trồng K, trong nhà màng có âm độ 75 - 85%, tốc độ gió 3,7 — 4,1 m/s được xác định là: K, = 0,4 trong giai đoạn dau, K, = 0,7 giai đoạn phát triển, K,
= 0,85 ở giai đoạn ra hoa, kết trái (Lê Anh Tuấn, 2009)
- Lượng bốc thoát hơi nước cây trồng tham khảo ET) được ước tinh bằng
công thức Blaney - Criddle (Brouwer va Heibloem, 1986).
ET = p (0,48T + 8)
+ p là tỷ lệ phần trăm số giờ chiếu sáng trung bình năm ở vĩ độ 10”, có giá trị được xác định tại các tháng dự kiến thực hiện thí nghiệm, như sau: p = ở Tháng,
(Brouwer và Heibloem, 1986).
+T là nhiệt độ trung bình ngày (°C)
Bảng 6 Kết quả ước tính 100% ET, dựa trên số liệu thời tiết trung bình tại các nhà màng trong vùng thí nghiệm từ 2014 — 2019 tại trạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Lượng nước Lượng Giai T ET, Etc tưới (L nước
đoạn The gia £ CC) (mmngày) es (mm/ngay) nuéc/1.000 tưới/cây/
m’/ngay) ngay (L)
7NST 1907/9721 028 28/7 29 0.40 244 7438.91 117 TNST _— 89-30921 028 287 29 0.70 4.27 4268.10 2.05
` Trungbinh ga 28,7 29 0,70 4,27 4.268,10 am
110-311021 0.29 280 26 0.85 528 5.284.96 254 Ra hoa 1/11—31/11/21 029 280 27 0.85 5.28 5,284.96 254
đếnhấi Irungbình 2o 2gQ 265 085 528 5.284.96 2,04
Phục lục 3 kết quả xử lý số liệu thí nghiệm 1
Ngay ra hoa (NST) - TN1 15:11 Tuesday, June 1, 1993 1 Class Levels Values
REP 3 123
VAR 4 KAMI KICHI LUCAS NL107 MDO 3 MD1 MD2 MD3
VARMDO 12 KAMIMD1 KAMIMD2 KAMIMD3 KICHIMD1 KICHIMD2 KICHIMD3 LUCASMD1 LUCASMD2 LUCASMD3 NL107 MD1 NL107MD2 NL1@7MD3
Number of observations 36
Chieu cao cay (cm) lan 1 - TN1 15:11 Dependent Variable: CCC1 (7 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 19 9.75111111 9.03953216 9.52 9.9107 Error 16 1.20888889 9.07555556
Corrected Total 35 1.96999090
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE CCC1 Mean 9.383220 4.062173 9.274874 6.766667
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value Pe > È REP 2 Q@.00666667 @.00333333 9.04 9.9579 VAR 3 9.04888889 9.01629639 9.22 9.8841 REP*VAR 6 9.35777778 9.05962963 9.79 9.5913 MDO 2 9.02000000 9.01990990 9.13 9.8779 VARMDO 6 9.31777778 9.05296296 9.79 9.6531
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pe > F VAR 3 9.04888889 9.01629639 9.27 9.8428
Chieu cao cay (cm) lan 2 - TN1 15:11 Dependent Variable: CCC2 (17 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value PP > OF Model 19 1959.434444 1093.128129 11.20 <.0001 Error 16 147.315556 9.207222
Corrected Total 35 2196. 759000
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE CCC2 Mean 9.939074 3.785827 3.034340 80.15000
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr & OF REP 2 286.6866667 143.3433333 15.57 9.0092 VAR 3 784.2788889 261.4262963 28.39 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 643.8377778 197.3062963 11.65 <.0001 MDO 2 2.6866667 1.3433333 9.15 9.8654 VARMDO 6 241.9444444 409.3240741 4.38 9.0984
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr & F VAR 3 784.2788889 261.4262963 2.44 9.1627
Duncan's Multiple Range Test for CCC2
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 16 Error Mean Square 9.207222
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
Duncan Grouping Mean N VARMDO A 92.800 3 KAMI MD2 B A 88.333 3 KAMI MD3
B G 83.267 =) KAMT MD1 D GC 82.133 3 LUCAS MD1 D (a E 79.333 3 NL197 MD1 D C E 78.733 3 NL197 MD3 D ¢ E 77.533 = LUCAS MD3 D E 77.409 3 KICHI MD1 E 76.067 3 KICHI MD2
83
Dependent Variable: CCC3 (27 NST)
E E E
76.067 3 75.490 3 74.733 3
NL107 KICHI LUCAS
Chieu cao cay (cm) lan 3 - TN1
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square Model 19 5612.847778 295 .413041 Error 16 540.782222 33.798889 Corrected Total 35 6153.630000
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE cc
@.912120 2.509683 5.813681 2
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square REP 2 369.206667 184.6063333 VAR 3 4697.212222 1535.737497 REP*VAR 6 307 .104444 51.184074 MDO 2 174.480000 87 .240000 VARMDO 6 154.844444 25 .807407
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square VAR 3 4697.212222 1535.737407
Dependent Variable: CCC4 (37 NST)
Source Model Error
Corrected Total
Source REP VAR REP*VAR MDO VARMDO
Critical Value of t
Least Significant Difference t Tests (LSD) for CCC3
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha
Error Degrees of Freedom Error Mean Square
8.0!
51.1849 2.4469 8.252
MD2 MD3 MD2
15:11
F Value Pre > 'F 8.74 <.0001
C3 Mean 31.6500
F Value Pr > F 5.46 9.0156 45.44 <.0001 1.51. 9.2369 2.58 9.1068 9.76 9.6089
as an Error Term F Value Pr > F
30.00 9.0095
5 6 7 1 4
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping
DF 19 16 35
R-Square 9.914613
DDANAWNT
A B B B
Mean 250.956 227.778 225.533 222.353
N
\ỉ \éễ (0 (ễ
VAR KAMI NL197 KICHI LUCAS
Chieu cao cay (cm) lan 4 - TN1
Sum of
Squares Mean Square 38555 .92444 2029.25918 3599 .53778 224.97111 42155 .46222
Coeff Var Root MSE (xe 4.555132 14.99904 3
Type I SS Mean Square 1051.29556 525.64778 34409 .48000 11469 .82667 460 .60667 76.76778 1323 .14889 661.57444 1311. 39333 218.56556
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type Source
VAR
DF 3
Critical Value of t
Least Significant Difference Type I SS
34409 .48000
15:11
F Value Pr > F 9.02 <.0@001
C4 Mean 29.2778
F Value Pr > F 2.34 9.1287 50.98 <.0001 9.34 9.9048 2.94 9.0817 9.97 9.4751
I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Mean Square
11469 .82667
t Tests (LSD) for CCC4
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha
Error Degrees of Freedom Error Mean Square
9.90
76.7677 2.4469
F Value Pr > F 149.41 <.0001
5.
6 8 1 19.107
Dependent Variable: CCC5 (47 NST)
+ Grouping A B C Ệ
Mean 381.944 323.778 319.778 301.511
VAR KAMT KTCHT NL107 LUCAS
wonvnoZz
Chieu cao cay (cm) lan 5 - TN1 15:11
Pr > F
@.0002
PP: 3ằ F 9.0555
<.0001 9.9429 9.1459 9.4792
Pr > F Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Model 19 80397. 31111 4231.43743 6.86 Error 16 9874.39111 617.14944
Corrected Total 35 90271.70222
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE CCC5 Mean 9.890615 6.328939 24.84249 392.5222
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value REP 2 4298 .68222 2149.34111 3.48 VAR 3 68783 .80000 22927 .93333 37.15 REP*VAR 6 1990.669090 166.77667 9.27 MDO 2 2685.48222 1342.74111 2.18 VARMDO 6 3628.68667 694.78111 9.98
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value
VAR 3 68783. 80000 22927 .93333 137.48
Dependent Variable: DKTHAN
Source Model Error
Corrected Total
Source REP VAR REP*VAR MDO VARMDO
Error Degrees of Freedom t Tests (LSD) for CCC5
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha
Error Mean Square Critical Value of t
9.05 6 166. 7767 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 14.896
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
+ Grouping
DF 19 16 35,
R-Square 9.918327
DF 2 3 6 2 6
A B C Ệ
Mean 465.156 387.333 364.533 353.067
N VAR 9 KAMI 9 KICHI 9 NL197 9 LUCAS
Duong kinh than (mm) - TN1
Sum of
Squares Mean Square 12.61514444 9.66395497 3,12195556 9.07012222 13.73719090
Coeff Var 2.660921
Type I SS 1.60486667 8.25505556 1.09104444
@.47780000 1.18637778
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type Source
VAR
DF 3
Type I SS 8.25505556
F Value 9.47
Root MSE DKTHAN Mean 9.264896 9.
Mean Square
@.80243333 2.75168519 9.18184974 09.23899000 9.19772963
951667
F Value 11.44 39.24 2.59 3.41 2.82
<.0001
15:11
Pr > F
<.0001
Pr > F 9.0008
<.0001 9.0598 9.0585 9.0455
I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Mean Square
2.75168519
t Tests (LSD) for DKTHAN
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 9.181841 Critical Value of t 2.44691
85
F Value 15,13
Pr > F 9.0033
Least Significant Difference 0.4919
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 10.6067 9 KICHI B A 10.1311 9 KAMI
B (8 9.7667 9 NL107
c 9.3022 9 LUCAS
Duncan's Multiple Range Test for DKTHAN
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 16 Error Mean Square @.070122
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
Duncan Grouping Mean N VARMDO A 11.0009 3 KICHI MD2 B A 10.5533 3 KICHI MD3 B A 10.5267 3 KAMI MD3 B C 10.2667 3 KTCHT MD1 B Cc D 10.0733 3 KAMI MD2 E Cc D 9.8067 3 NL107 MD3 E (a D 9.7933 3 KAMT MD1 E D 9.7535 3 NL197 MD1 E F D 9.7400 3 NL107 MD2 E F 9.3467 3 LUCAS MD1 E F 9.3133 3 LUCAS MD3 F 9.2467 3 LUCAS MD2
So la/cay lan 2 - TN1 5:11 Dependent Variable: SLA2 (17 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 19 44.20777778 2.32672515 9.54 <.0001 Error 16 3.90222222 9.24388889
Corrected Total 35 48.11000900
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SLA2 Mean
@.918890 4.275767 0.493851 11.55000
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr 3 F REP 2 2.89666667 1.40333333 5.75 @.0131 VAR 3 28.83888889 9.61296296 39.42 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 9.93111111 1.65518519 6.79 9.0019 MDO 2 9.14900000 9.07000090 9.29 9.7543 VARMDO 6 2.49111111 9.41518519 1.79 9.1846
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F VAR 3 28.83888889 9.61296296 5.81 9.0330
t Tests (LSD) for SLA2
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 1.655185 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 1.484
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
+ Grouping Mean N VAR A 12.6000 9 LUCAS B A 12.2222 9 KAMI B ế 19.9778 9 NL107
c 10.4000 9 KICHI
So la/cay lan 3 - TN1 15311 Dependent Variable: SLA3 (27 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr 3 iP Model 19 132.9288889 6.9962573 8.64 <.0001
Corrected Total 35 145.8888889
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SLA3 Mean 9.911165 3.025775 @.900000 29.74444
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value Pr > iF REP 2 5.2355556 2.6177778 3.23 9.0662
VAR 3 115.7022222 38.56740974 47.61 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 5.6177778 9.9362963 1.16 9.3764 MDO 2 1.0155556 @.5077778 9.63 9.5469 VARMDO 6 5.3577778 @.8929630 1.10 @.4031
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > E VAR 3 115.7022222 38.5674074 41.19 9.0092
t Tests (LSD) for SLA3
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 9.936296 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 1.1161
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 32.2444 9 LUCAS B 30.0222 9 KAMT B 29.5111 9 NL197 G 27.2000 9 KICHI
So la/cay lan 4 - TN1 45:11 Dependent Variable: SLA4 (37 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 19 229.9022222 12.10901170 10.07 <.@001 Error 16 19.2266667 1.2016667
Corrected Total 35 249.1288889
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SLA4 Mean
@.922824 2.737472 1.096206 49.94444
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value Pr & F REP 2 6.9355556 3.4677778 2.89 9.0851 VAR 3 291.0755556 67.90251852 55.78 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 6.1044444 1.0174074 9.85 9.5528 MDO 2 5.5755556 2.7877778 2.32 9.1394 VARMDO 6 109.2111111 1.7018519 1.42 9.2684
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value Pr > F VAR 3 201.0755556 67.0251852 65.88 <.0001
t Tests (LSD) for SLA4
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 1.917497 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 1.1635
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 43.2444 9 KAMI B 41.3556 9 LUCAS
€ 38.1111 9 NL107 L6 37.4667 9 KTCHT
So la/cay lan 5 - TN1 15:11 Dependent Variable: SLA5 (47 NST)
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr ứ E
S7
Model Error
Corrected Total
Source REP VAR REP*VAR MDO VARMDO
19 16 35
R-Square 9.905599
DANAWNT
425.1985417 44 .3233333 469.5218759
Coeff Var 3.600312
Type I SS 17.7087500 349.8818750 25.6095833 12.2037500 19.7945833
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type Source
VAR
Dependent Variable: DTLA29
Source Model Error
Corrected Total
Source REP VAR REP*VAR MDO VARMDO
DF 3
Type I SS 349.8818759
22.37887906 8.08
2.7702083
Root MSE SLA5 Mean 1.664394 46.22917
Mean Square F Value 8.8543750 3.20 116.6272917 42.10 4.2682639 1.54 6.1018750 2.20 3.2990972 Tạ 19
<.0001
Pr > F 9.0679
<.0001 9.2289 9.1429 9.3599
I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term F Value
27.32 Mean Square
116.6272917
t Tests (LSD) for SLA5
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 4.268264 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 2.3831
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping A B Ệ ế
DF 19 16 35
R-Square 9.974291
DF
œ h Ơœ U! 2
Mean 51.2333 46.4667 43.7500 43.4667
N VAR 9 KAMI 9 LUCAS
=) KTCHT 9 NL107
Dien tich la o 29 NST - TN1
Sum of
Squares Mean Square F Value 114007 .8373 6000.4125 31.91
3098.4171 188.0261 117016.2543
Coeff Var Root MSE DTLA2@ Mean 4.436877 13.71226 3909.0521
Type I Ss Mean Square F Value 3373.0774 1686.5387 6.97 196654.6729 35551.5576 189.08 2692.9557 448.8259 2.39 65.5976 32.7988 9.17 1221:5337 293. 5890 1.08
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type Source
VAR
DF 3
Type I SS 106654.6729
Pr > F 9.0097
15:11
PP > E
<.0001
Pr > F 9.0924
<.9901 9.0779 9.8415 9.4133
I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term F Value
79.21 Mean Square
35551.5576
t Tests (LSD) for DTLA29
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 448.8259 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 24.437
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping A B B G
Mean 364.883 337.336 313.876 220.113
N VAR 9 KTCHT 9 KAMI 9 NL197 9 LUCAS
Dien tich la o 29 NST - TN1
Pr oF
<.0001
15211
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr & |F Model 19 592459.2111 31182 .0637 118.63 <.0001 Error 16 4205.5842 262.8490
Corrected Total 55 596664.7953
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE DTLA4@ Mean 9.992952 3.431135 16.21262 472.5147
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value Pr 2 F REP 2 301041 .4339 150520.7169 572.65 <.0001 VAR 3 223672.5509 74557.5179 283.65 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 17667.2351 2944.5392 11.20 <.0001 MDO 2 11370.7676 5685.3838 21.63 <.0001 VARMDO 6 38707 .2236 6451.2039 24.54 <.0001
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value Pr > F VAR 3 223672.5509 74557.5179 25.32 9.0098
t Tests (LSD) for DTLA49
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 2944.539 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 62.592
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 551.58 9 KAMI A 540.73 9 NL107 B 438.26 9 KICHI G 359.49 9 LUCAS
t Tests (LSD) for DTLA4@
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 16 Error Mean Square 262.849 Critical Value of t 2.11991 Least Significant Difference 14.031
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N MDO A 489.535 12 MD2 A 480.021 12 MD3 B 447.988 12 MD1
Duncan's Multiple Range Test for DTLA4@
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 16 Error Mean Square 262.849
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
Duncan Grouping Mean N VARMDO A 596.02 3 NL107 MD2 A 588.64 3 NL107 MD3 B 558.90 3 KAMT MD2 B 551.91 3 KAMI MD3 B 543.91 3 KAMT MD1
€ 454.28 3 KICHI MD1 D Cc 439.23 3 KICHI MD2 D € 437.54 3 NL107 MD1 D 421.27 3 KICHI MD3 E 363.98 3 LUCAS MD2 E 358.26 3 LUCAS MD3
E 356.23 3 LUCAS M Chieu dai qua (cm) - TN1 17:15 Tuesday, June 1, 1993 1
Dependent Variable: CDQUA
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr ứ E
89
Model 19 117.7436889 6.1970363 834.15 <.0001 Error 16 9.1188667 9.0974292
Corrected Total 35 117.8625556
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE CDQUA Mean 9.998991 9.692929 9.086193 12.43889
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value Pr > iF REP 2 9.0112722 9.0056361 9.76 9.4844 VAR 3 117.6622889 39.22907630 5279.30 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 @.0286611 9.0047769 9.64 9.6959 MDO 2 @.0100389 9.0059194 9.68 9.5228 VARMDO 6 9.0314278 9.0052389 9.71 9.6592 Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value Pe > IƑ VAR 3 117.6622889 39.22076360 8210.59 <.0001 NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 9.004777 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 9.0797
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
1
Pr > iP 9.0053
Pr > iF 9.4375
<.0001 9.5878 9.3069 9.3080
Pr > F 9.0011 t Grouping Mean N VAR
A 14.27778 9 KAMI A 14.20333 9 KICHI B 10.84556 9 NL107 ie 10.42889 9 LUCAS
Vi dang (diem) - TN1 98:19 Tuesday, June 1, 1993 Dependent Variable: VDANG
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Model 19 8.20777778 9.43198830 3.72 Error 16 1.85777778 90.11611111
Corrected Total 35 19.06555556
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE VDANG Mean 9.815432 15.07006 @.340751 2.261111 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value REP 2 @.20222222 @.10111111 9.87 VAR 3 6.24333333 22.08111111 17.92 REP*VAR 6 9.55333333 09.09222222 9.79 MDO 2 9.29555556 9.14777778 1:27 VARMDO 6 9.91333333 09.15222222 Lead
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value VAR 3 6.24333333 2.08111111 22.57
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square @.092222 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 0.3503
Dependent Variable: CSDLT
Source Model Error
Corrected Total
Source REP
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grou
DF 19 16 35
R-Square 9.939678
DF 2
ping
A B B B
Mean 2.9778 2.0889 2.0222 1.9556
N VAR 9 LUCAS 9 NL107 9 KAMI 9 KTCHT Chi so diep luc to - TN1
Sum Squares 849.0792333 54.5058667 993.5851000
Coeff Var 4.066170
Type I SS 54.6818000
of
Mean Square F Value
44.68838907 13.12
3.4066167
Root MSE CSDLT Mean 1.845702 45.39167
Mean Square F Value 27.3409000 8.03
15312
Pr > F
<.0001
Pr > F 9.0039
9.6477 9.3520 9.3190
Pr>F
REP*VAR 6 14.48063333 2.4133889 6.71
MDO 2 7.5998000 3.7999000 1.12 VARMDO 6 26.2423333 4.3737222 1.28
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value
VAR 3 746.0749667 248.6916556 193.05
t Tests (LSD) for CSDLT
<.0001
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 2.413389 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 1.7919
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 51.2156 9 NL107 B 48.4556 9 LUCAS
€ 41.1667 9 KAMI C 40.7289 2) KTCHT Tong so hoa (hoa/cay) - TN1
Dependent Variable: TSHOA
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 19 98633.8608 5191.2558 7.10 9.0001
Error 16 11705.0100 731.5631 Corrected Total 35 110338. 8708
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE TSHOA Mean
@.893918 1547115 27.04742 178.2819
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F REP 2 226.92764 113.46382 9.16 9.8576 VAR 3 92197.15076 30732.38359 42.01 <.0001 REP*VAR 6 4603 .55736 767.25956 1.95 9.4314 MDO 2 55.94597 27.97299 9.04 9.9626
VARMDO 6 1559.279093 258.37984 9.35 9.8977 Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value Pr & F VAR 3 92197.15076 30732. 38359 40.05 9.0002
t Tests (LSD) for TSHOA
Alpha 9.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 6 Error Mean Square 767.2596 Critical Value of t 2.44691 Least Significant Difference 31.951
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N VAR A 262.98 8 LUCAS
B 171.26 8 KTCHT
€ B 141.04 9 NL107 Cc 137.85 9 KAMT
Dependent Variable: TLDQ
Ty le dau qua (3%) - TN1
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square Model 19 1599.832522 84.201712 Error 16 124.914467 7.807154 Corrected Total 35 1724.746989
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE TLDQ 9.927575 9.461822 2.794129 29.
Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square REP 2 79.2647722 35.1323861 VAR 3 896.4724556 268.8241519 REP*VAR 6 365.5735611 609.9289269 MDO 2 282.7396056 141. 3698928 VARMDO 6 74.7821278 12.46368890
91
F Value 10.79
Mean 53056
F Value 4.50 34.43 7.89 18.11 1.69
4511.
Pr: > F
<.0001
r > F +0281 - 0001 - 0005 - 0001 +2120
®A@®@®ẰAG@®vC
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Term Source
VAR
Dependent Variable: SQTC
DF Type I SS Mean
3 806.4724556 268.8241519
F Value 4.41 Square
t Tests (LSD) for TLDQ
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate.
Alpha
Error Degrees of Freedom Error Mean Square
Critical Value of t
Least Significant Difference
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N A 33.178 12 B 29.051 12 Cc 26.363 12
9.05 16 7.807154 2.71991, 2.4182
MDO MD3 MD2 MD1
Trung binh so qua/cay - TN1
Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Model 19 3288.775911 173.0993469 9.52 Error 16 290. 765689 18.172856
Corrected Total 35 3579.541690
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE SQTC Mean 9.918779 7.886587 4.262963 54.05333
Source DF Type T SS Mean Square F Value REP 2 144. 316890 72.158400 3.97 VAR 3 1819.356989 696.4520309 33.37 REP*VAR 6 1809.776178 39.129363 1.66 MDO 2 999.6926909 499.8463009 27.51 VARMDO 6 144.634244 24.105707 1.33
Tests of Hypotheses Using the Type I MS for REP*VAR as an Error Source DF Type I Ss Mean Square F Value VAR 3 1819.356089 696.4529030 29.13
Dependent Variable: DKQUA
t Tests (LSD) for SQTC
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error Alpha
Error Degrees of Freedom Error Mean Square
Critical Value of t
Least Significant Difference
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N A 64.200 9 B 54.978 9 B 52.822 9 c 44.213 9
@.05 6 39.12936 2.44691 6.3315
VAR LUCAS KTCHT NL197 KAMT
t Tests (LSD) for SQTC
NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error Alpha
Error Degrees of Freedom Error Mean Square
Critical Value of t
Least Significant Difference
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N A 60.982 12 B 52.967 12
€ 48.212 12
Duong kinh qua (mm) -
9.05 16 18.17286 2.11991 3.6894
MDO MD3 MD2 MD1
TN1
Pr > F 9.0581
45:11
Pr > F
<.0001
Pr > F 9.0398
<.0001 9.1956
<.0001 9.3018
Term Pr>F 9.0016
rate.
rate.
a5 301